This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)(Learn how and when to remove this template message)
|Part of a series on the|
|Literature and other|
Italian grammar is the body of rules describing the properties of the Italian language. Italian words can be divided into the following lexical categories: articles, nouns, adjectives, pronouns, verbs, adverbs, prepositions, conjunctions, and interjections.
- 1 Articles
- 2 Inflection of nouns and adjectives
- 3 Nouns
- 4 Adjectives
- 5 Pronouns
- 6 Verbs
- 6.1 Tenses
- 6.2 Compound tense auxiliary verbs
- 6.3 Past participle
- 6.4 Tense relationship in subordinate sentences
- 6.5 Regular conjugations
- 6.6 Irregular verbs
- 7 Adverbs
- 8 Prepositions
- 9 Sentences and word order
- 10 Disputed points in Italian grammar
- 11 Italian grammar books
- 12 References
- 13 External links
Italian articles vary according to definiteness (definite, indefinite, and partitive), number, gender, and the initial sound of the subsequent word. Partitive articles compound the preposition di with the corresponding definite article, to express uncertain quantity. In the plural, they typically translate into English as "few". In the singular, typically as "some".
|Masculine||Singular||il||The standard definite article for masculine singular Italian nouns is il, used in every case other than those detailed below.|
|lo||The alternate form lo is used before words with certain initial sounds:
|l'||The apocopic/contracted form l' is used before words with an initial vowel (l'amico) and before ⟨uo⟩ /wɔ/ (l'uomo).|
|Plural||i||The form i is used for plurals that take il in the singular. i cani (plural of il cane).|
|gli||The plural definite article gli corresponds to lo and l' in the singular, i.e. before the consonants listed above for lo and before vowels. gli zii (plural of lo zio), gli amici (plural of l'amico).|
|Feminine||Singular||la||Standard form of the feminine singular definite article, used before consonants and before ⟨i⟩ when pronounced as semivowel /j/, e.g. la iarda.|
|l'||The articles lo and la elide to ⟨l'⟩ before any vowel, not including ⟨i⟩ when pronounced as semivowel /j/.|
|Plural||le||The feminine plural definite article le is normally used in full form, never elided.|
|Masculine||un||The standard form un is used before vowels and simple consonants.|
|uno||The form uno is used instead of un before "impure s", self-geminating consonants, and complex consonant clusters following the same rules as lo vs. il above, for example: uno studente.|
|Feminine||una||The standard form of the feminine singular indefinite article is una.|
|un'||The article una elides to un' before any vowel, not including ⟨i⟩ when used as semivowel /j/.|
|Masculine||Singular||del||The standard form of the masculine singular partitive particle is del, a contraction of di and il, often translated into English as "some".|
|dell'||The masculine singular partitive article contracts to dell' before any vowel.|
|dello||The form dello is used before "impure s", self-geminating consonants, and complex consonant clusters following the same rules as lo.|
|Plural||dei||The standard masculine plural partitive article is dei, e.g.: Ci sono dei libri sul tavolo ("There are some books on the table").|
|degli||The masculine plural partitive article is degli before vowels, self-geminating consonants, and complex consonant clusters.|
|Feminine||Singular||della||The standard form of the partitive feminine singular article is della, a contraction of di and la.|
|dell'||The singular feminine partitive article contracts to dell' before any vowel.|
|Plural||delle||The plural feminine partitive article is invariantly delle.|
Inflection of nouns and adjectives
Nouns and adjectives generally inflect by gender (masculine and feminine, with only some instances of vestigial neuter) and number (singular and plural). Inflection patterns are similar for the two categories:
|Masculine||-o||-i||il capello nero, i capelli neri ("the black hair")|
|Feminine||-a||-e||la bella macchina, le belle macchine ("the beautiful car(s)")|
|Masculine and feminine||-e||-i||il/la comandante intelligente, i/le comandanti intelligenti ("the smart commander(s)")|
|Former neuter (singular masculine, plural feminine)||-o||-a||il lenzuolo leggero, le lenzuola leggere ("the light bed sheet(s)")|
|Masculine||-a||-i||l'atleta entusiasta, gli atleti entusiasti ("the enthusiastic athlete(s)")|
|Feminine||-ie||-ie||la specie estinta, le specie estinte ("the extinct species")|
|All nouns ending with a stressed vowel||singular = plural||la città, le città ("the city/cities")|
|Non-integrated loanwords||il/la manager trendy, i/le manager trendy ("the trendy manager(s)")|
In the last two examples, only the article carries information about gender and number.
Most masculine words that end in -io pronounced as /jo/ simply drop the -o and thus end in just -i in the plural: occhio / occhi ("eye(s)"), funzionario / funzionari ("functionary/functionaries"), vecchio / vecchi ("old"), etc.
- Words in -cio and -gio form plurals in -ci and -gi, e.g. bacio / baci ("kiss(es)")
- Words in -cia and -gia have been a point of contention; according to a commonly employed rule, they:
- form plurals in -cie and -gie if the final letter before the suffix is a vowel: camicia, camicie ("shirt(s)"); ciliegia, ciliegie ("cherry"/"cherries").
- form plurals in -ce and -ge if the final letter before the suffix is a consonant: frangia, frange ("fringe(s)"); faccia, facce ("face(s)").
- when the i is stressed, it always remains in plural: farmacia / farmacie ("chemist's shop(s)"), nevralgia / nevralgie ("neuralgia(s)").
- Words in -co and -go behave quite irregularly: "the grammarians are skeptical of any attempt at giving a ruling about this area". There are only partial, empirical rules of thumb:
- plurals are formed with -chi and -ghi if the last letter before the suffix is a consonant or a stressed vowel: fungo / funghi ("mushroom(s)"), stecco / stecchi ("stick(s)"), mago / maghi ("magician(s)"), fuoco / fuochi ("fire(s)")
- plurals are formed with -ci and -gi if the last letter before the suffix is an unstressed vowel: comico / comici ("comedian(s)"), medico / medici ("physician(s)")
- in words ending with -logo suffix, the plural is usually in -gi when -logo means "expert" or "student", corresponding to English -logist (e.g. archeologo / archeologi, "archaeologist(s)"), while it is in -ghi when it means "speech" or "reasoning", corresponding often to English -logue/-log (e.g. catalogo / cataloghi, "catalogue(s)").
- there are exceptions such as amico / amici ("friend(s)"), greco / greci ("Greek(s)"), valico / valichi ("mountain pass(es)"), carico / carichi ("cargo(s)").
Although as in all Romance languages, the neuter gender has been lost in Italian, the neuter function has been absorbed into the masculine; masculine pronouns and adjectives are used to refer to and describe unspecified neuter things such as facts and ideas (e.g. Lo so ("I know it"), where lo is the masculine third-person singular unstressed direct object pronoun).
Most nouns derive from Latin, from Greek or from a Latinization of foreign words:
|1st (-a / -ae)||poeta / poeti "poet(s)"||rosa / rose "rose(s)"|
|2nd (-us / -ī; -um / -a)||carro / carri "truck(s)"
vezzo / vezzi "habit(s)"
|3rd (-Ø, -is / -ēs)||cane / cani "dog(s)"||parete / pareti "wall(s)"|
|3rd (-ās / -ātēs)||città / città "town(s)"|
|4th (-us / -ūs)||passo / passi "step(s)"||mano / mani "hand(s)"|
|5th (-ēs / -ēs)||specie / specie "species"|
|Greek words||problema / problemi "problem(s)"||crisi / crisi "crisis", "crises"|
Any other noun, both those from Latin with an unusual ending and those derived from languages other than Latin or Greek, and not Latinized citation needed], and nouns ending with a stressed vowel are not inflected, thus:[
- il re / i re ("the king(s)": rex / reges)
- il caffè / i caffè ("the coffee(s)")
- il film / i film ("the film(s)")
There are certain words (neuter in Latin) that are masculine in the singular and feminine or masculine in the plural:
- il braccio / le braccia or i bracci ("the arm(s)")
- l'uovo / le uova ("the egg(s)")
- il ginocchio / le ginocchia or i ginocchi ("the knee(s)")
- il sopracciglio / le sopracciglia or i sopraccigli ("the eyebrow(s)")
These nouns' endings derive regularly from the Latin neuter endings of the second declension (sg. -um / pl. -a), but there are some from the third declension: e.g. il gregge / le greggi (flock(s), but i greggi works, too); the tradition of calling them "irregular" or "mobile gender" (genere mobile) would come from the paradigm that there are so few nouns of this kind that the existence of neuter can be considered vestigial. The choice of plural is sometimes left to the user, while in some cases there are differences of meaning:
- Sometimes, for body parts, the feminine/neuter plural denotes the literal meaning while the masculine one denotes a figurative meaning: il braccio ("the arm") / le braccia ("the arms") / i bracci ("the isthmuses", "the inlets"); il corno ("the horn") / le corna ("the horns" of an animal) / i corni ("the horns" as musical instruments)
- Sometimes, especially in poetic and old-fashioned Italian, the masculine plural acts as a count noun, while the neuter/feminine plural acts as a mass noun: il cervello ("the brain") / due cervelli ("two brains") / le cervella ("the cerebral matter"); l'anello ("the ring") / due anelli ("two rings") / le anella ("ringlets"); furthermore, il dito ("the finger") / le dita ("the fingers") and also due dita ("two fingers") / but i diti indici ("the index fingers")
There are very few true irregular plurals in Italian (plurali irregolari). Some of these are:
- l'uomo / gli uomini (man/men; Latin homo / homines )
- il dio / gli dei (god/gods; note also the irregularity in the article: gli instead of i)
- il bue / i buoi (ox/oxen; Latin bos / boves)
- il tempio / i templi (temple/temples)
- il carcere / le carceri (prison (masculine) / prisons (feminine))
- l'ala / le ali (wing/wings) (but "l'ale" is poetically admitted)
- l'arma / le armi (weapon/weapons) (but "l'arme" is poetically admitted)
- la mano / le mani (hand/hands)
- l'eco / gli echi (echo (feminine) / echos (masculine))
In Italian, altered nouns are nouns with particular shades of meaning. They are divided into diminutives, "vezzeggiativi" (diminutives with kindness and sympathy nuance), augmentatives and pejoratives.
|-ino||tavolo (table)||tavolino (a small table)|
|-ello||bambino (child)||bambinello (a little child)|
(terms of endearment)
|-olo||figlio (son)||figliolo (also figliuolo)|
|-one||libro (book)||librone (a big book)|
|-accio||libro (book)||libraccio (a bad book)|
|-astro||medico (medic)||medicastro (quack doctor)|
|-uncolo||uomo (man)||omuncolo (an insignificant man)|
Many other alterations can be built, sometimes with more than one suffix: for example, libro (book) can become libretto (diminutive), libricino (double diminutive), libercolo (diminutive + pejorative), libraccio (pejorative), libraccione (pejorative + augmentative). Uomo (man), coming from Latin homo, becomes om- in altered forms: omino (diminutive), omone (augmentative), omaccio (pejorative), omaccione (augmentative + pejorative).
In Italian, an adjective can be placed before or after the noun. The unmarked placement for most adjectives (e.g. colours, nationalities) is after the noun, but this is reversed for a few common classes of adjective — those denoting beauty, age, goodness, and size are placed before the noun in the unmarked case, and after the noun for emphasis.
- un libro rosso = a red book (the unmarked case)
- un rosso libro = a book that is red (the marked case; it is especially important to the intended meaning that the book is *red*, as opposed to some other color.)
- un buon uomo = a good man (the unmarked case)
- un uomo buono = a man who is good (the marked case; it is especially important to the intended meaning that he is good, the adjective is emphasized)
Adjectives are inflected for gender and number:
|Gender||Grammatical number||Case 1||Case 2|
Degrees of comparison
The comparative and relative superlative are formed with più ("more", "most"); for instance:
- sono più alto di te ("I am taller than you")
- sono il più alto fra gli uomini ("I am the tallest of men")
Vice versa, inverting the order of the words, it's required to replace più with meno ("less", "few"); for instance:
- sono il meno forte del campionato ("I am the least strong of the championship")
- tu sei meno alto di me ("You are less tall than me")
Another comparative form is made with the word come ('as', 'like'); for instance:
- sono alto come te ("I am as tall as you")
The absolute comparative is formed by placing troppo ("too") before the adjective; for instance:
- sei troppo buono ("you are too good").
The absolute superlative, derived from the Latin synthetic superlative in -issimus, is formed by adding -issimo to an adjective: intelligente ("intelligent"), intelligentissimo ("very intelligent"); sporco ("dirty") sporchissimo ("very dirty"). If the two letters before the last vowel are pr or br (e.g., aspro, celebre), the r is removed and -errimo is the suffix used (asperrimo, celeberrimo) ("very sour", "very famous"). Another way to form the absolute superlative is to place either molto or assai ("very") before the adjective. For instance sporchissimo and molto sporco ("very dirty") are the same.
Some adjectives have irregular comparatives (though with regularly-formed variants also in common use), like
- buono ("good"), migliore / più buono ("better" or "best"), migliore / ottimo / buonissimo ("very good")
- cattivo ("bad"), peggiore / più cattivo ("worse" or "worst"), pessimo / cattivissimo ("very bad")
- grande ("big"), maggiore / più grande ("bigger"), massimo / grandissimo ("very big")
- piccolo ("small"), minore / più piccolo ("smaller"), minimo / piccolissimo ("very small")
Possessive adjectives, like articles, must agree with the gender and number of the noun they modify. Hence, mio zio (my uncle), but mia zia (my aunt). So depending on what is being modified, the possessive adjectives are:
In most cases the possessive adjective is used with an article, usually the definite article:
|Ho perso la mia penna.||("I have lost my pen.")|
|Mi piace il mio lavoro.||("I like my job.")|
|Hanno rubato la mia automobile!||("They have stolen my car!")|
And with the indefinite article:
|Un mio amico mi ha detto che...||("A friend of mine told me that...")|
|Ho visto una sua foto.||("I have seen a photograph of him/her.")|
|Luca è un mio amico.||("Luke is a friend of mine.")|
The only exception is when the possessive refers to an individual family member, (unless the family member is described or characterized in some way):
|Laura è mia sorella||("Laura is my sister.")|
|Ieri ho visto mia sorella Diana||("I saw my sister Diana yesterday.")|
|Questa penna è di mia zia.||("This pen is my aunt's.")|
But mamma and papà (or babbo, in Central Italy) (mother and father) usually get the article.
For emphasis, however, possessive adjectives are sometimes placed after a noun. This is usually after words like 'colpa' (fault, sin); 'casa' (house, home); 'merito' (merit); 'piacere' (pleasure); or in vocative expressions.
|È colpa sua||("It is his/her fault")|
|Oh dio mio!||("Oh, my god!")|
|Arrivederci, amico mio!||("Goodbye, my friend!")|
|Vorresti andare a casa mia?||("Would you like to come over to my house?")|
If the antecedent of a third person possessive (being used as an object) is the subject of the sentence, proprio can be used instead of suo, though the usage of proprio is declining in the spoken language:
|Marco e Maria hanno discusso di filosofia. Marco ha scelto il proprio punto di vista.||("Marco and Maria discussed philosophy. Marco took his own point of view.")|
|Marco e Maria hanno discusso di filosofia. Marco ha scelto il suo punto di vista.||("Marco and Maria discussed philosophy. Marco took his/her point of view.")|
The first sentence is unambiguous and states that Marco took his own point of view, whereas the second sentence is ambiguous because it may mean that Marco took either his own or Maria's point of view.
Italian originally had three degrees of demonstrative adjectives: questo (for items near or related to the first person speaker: English "this"), quello (for items near or related to an eventual third person: English "that"), and codesto (for items near or related to an eventual second person). The usage has undergone a simplification, including the meaning of codesto in quello. Only Tuscan speakers still use codesto. In modern Italian, its use is very rare, and the word has acquired a rather pejorative connotation.
Italian features a sizeable set of pronouns. Personal pronouns are inflected by person, number, case, and, in the third person, gender. Literary subject pronouns also have a distinction between animate (egli, ella) and inanimate (esso, essa) antecedents, although this is lost in colloquial usage, where lui, lei and loro are used for animate subjects as well as objects, while no specific pronoun is employed for inanimate subjects (if needed, demonstrative pronouns such as "questo" or "quello" may be used). There is also the uninflected pronoun ciò, which is only used with abstract antecedents.
Personal pronouns are normally dropped in the subject, as the conjugation is usually enough to determine the grammatical person. They are used when some emphasis is needed, e.g. sono italiano ("I am Italian") vs. io sono italiano ("I [specifically, as opposed to others] am Italian").
|Clitic form||Stressed form||Clitic form I.[b]||Clitic form II.[c]||Stressed form||Clitic form[d]||Stressed form[e]||Clitic form I.[f]||Clitic form II.[g]||Stressed form|
|Sing.||1st.||io||—||di me||mi||me||a me||mi||me||—||—||con me|
|2nd.||tu[h]||—||di te||ti||te||a te||ti||te||—||—||con te|
|3rd.||m.||egli, esso, lui[i]||ne||di lui||gli[j]||glie-[j][k]||a lui||lo[l]||lui||ci||ce||con lui|
|f.||ella, essa, lei[h][i]||di lei||le||a lei||la[l]||lei||con lei|
|refl.||—||di sé||si||se||a sé||si||sé||con sé|
|Plur.||1st.||noi||—||di noi||ci||ce||a noi||ci||noi||—||—||con noi|
|2nd.||voi||—||di voi||vi||ve||a voi||vi||voi||—||—||con voi|
|3rd.||m.||essi, loro[h][i]||ne||di loro||loro[m]||a loro||li||loro||ci||ce||con loro|
|refl.||—||di sé||si||se||a sé||si||sé||con sé|
- The words ci and ne act as both clitic pronouns and clitic pro-forms for "there" (ci, as in c'è, ci sono, ci vengo, etc.) and "from there" (ne, as in È entrato in casa alle 10:00 e ne è uscito alle 11:00).
- Alone, as in Ti do un libro
- Before another clitic pronoun, as in Te lo do
- When unstressed accusative pronouns are used in compound tenses, the final vowel of the past participle must agree in gender and number with the accusative pronoun. For example, Hai comprato i cocomeri e le mele? ("Did you buy the watermelons and the apples?") - Li [i cocomeri] ho comprati ma non le [le mele] ho comprate ("I bought them [the former] but I did not buy them [the latter]"). This also happens when the underlying pronoun is made opaque by elision: l'ho svegliato ("I woke him up"), versus L'ho svegliata ("I woke her up").
- The stressed form of the accusative also acts as the prepositional object.
- Alone, as in Ci chiacchiero
- Before another clitic pronoun, as in:
– Vedresti Carla con una gonna lunga e un cappello?
– Sì, ce la vedrei.
- The 2nd person nominative pronoun is tu for informal use. For formal use, the 3rd person form Lei has been used since the Renaissance: it is used like "Sie" in German, "usted" in Spanish and "você" in Portuguese. Previously, and in some Italian regions today (e.g., Campania), voi is used as a formal singular, like French "vous". The pronouns lei (third-person singular) and Lei (second-person singular formal) are pronounced the same but written as shown. Loro is the formal second-person plural pronoun, and formal Lei and Loro take third-person conjugations. Formal Lei is invariable for gender (always feminine), but adjectives that modify it are not: one would say to a man La conosco ("I know you") but Lei è alto ("You are tall"). Formal Loro is variable for gender: Li conosco ("I know you [masc. pl.]") vs. Le conosco ("I know you [fem. pl.]"), etc. The formal plural is very rarely used in modern Italian; the unmarked form is widely used instead. Lei was originally an object form of ella, which in turn referred to an honorific of the feminine gender such as la magnificenza tua / vostra ("Your Magnificence") or Vossignoria ("Your Lordship"). For example: "Gino, Lei è un bravo ingegnere. Marco, Lei è un bravo architetto. Insieme, voi sarete una gran bella squadra" "Gino, you are a good engineer. Marco, you are a good architect. Together, you will be a very good team".
- Previously only accusative, today lui, lei and loro are also accepted as nominative.
- In modern Italian, dative gli ("to him") and glie- ("to him/her") is used commonly even as the plural (to them) instead of the classical loro. So: Conosci Luca: gli ho sempre detto di stare lontano dalle cattive compagnie ("You know Luca: I have always told him to stay away from bad companies") and: Conosci Luca e Gino: gli ho sempre detto... ("...I have always told them...") instead of ... ho sempre detto loro di stare.... It works even in the feminine: Conosci Lucia e Gina: gli ho sempre detto... instead of the more classical ... ho detto loro....
- Normally composing one word together with the following pronoun. Compare Gliene sono grato with Te ne sono grato.
- *Accusative lo and la elide to l' before a vowel or before h: l'avevo detto ("I had said it"), l'ho detto ("I have said it").
- Not clitic at all; simply follows the verb as with normal nouns. Compare Gli dico (3rd. sing. m., proclitic form I.) with Dico loro (3rd. plur. m. and f.) and Gliene do due (3rd. sing. m. and f., proclitic form II.) with Ne do loro due (3rd. plur. m. and f.).
- The old elle, plural of ella, is now abandoned.
Clitic pronouns come before the verb. If an auxiliary verb is used, the pronouns come before the auxiliary.
|Genitive||Non vedo Francesco, ma ne vedo la bicicletta.||I do not see Francesco, but I see the bike of him.|
|Dative||Gli parlai per un'ora intera.||I spoke to him for a whole hour.|
|Accusative||Lo vedo.||I see him.|
|Instrumental||Sì! Lo conosco! Una volta ci giocai a pallacanestro!||Yes! I know him! Once I played basketball with him!|
|Davide lascia la sua penna in ufficio.||(David leaves his pen at the office.)|
|Davide la lascia in ufficio.||(David leaves it at the office.)|
|Davide ce la lascia.||(David leaves it to us. (but also : David leaves it there.))|
|Davide ce ne lascia una.||(David leaves us one of them. (but also [rare]: David leaves one [of them] there.))|
|Davide potrebbe lasciarcene una.||(David might leave us one of them (but also [rare]: David might leave one [of them] there.))|
|or Davide ce ne potrebbe lasciare una.||(exactly the same as above)|
Finally, in the imperative mood, the objective pronouns come once again after the verb, but this time as a suffix:
|Davide lascia la sua penna in ufficio.||(David leaves his pen at the office.)|
|"Lasciala in ufficio!"||("Leave it at the office!")|
|"Lasciacela!"||("Leave it to us!" also [less common] "Leave it there!")|
|Davide potrebbe lasciarla in ufficio.||(David might leave it at the office.)|
|"Non lasciarcela!"||("Do not leave it to us!" also [less common] "Do not leave it there!")|
|Davide dovrebbe lasciarcela.||("David should leave it to us." also [less common] "David should leave it there")|
- Dative mi, ti, ci, and vi become me, te, ce, and ve when preceding another pronoun ("dammelo" (give it to me)) or develop as a me, a te, a noi and a voi when emphasized ("dallo a me" (give it TO ME)).
- In colloquial speech the clitic form of the dative pronouns (mi, ti, gli, le, ci, vi) is often associated with the emphasized dative form (a me, a te, a lui, a lei, a noi, a voi, a loro) in such a way: a me mi danno un libro (they give me a book), a loro gli hanno venduto una casa (they sold them a house). It is not grammatically correct, since it represents a repetition of the dative pronoun, but it is widely used by Italian speaking people.
- Accusative mi, ti, lo, la, ci, and vi become me, te, lui, lei, noi, and voi when emphasized ("uccidimi" (kill me) against "uccidi me, non lui" (kill me, not him)).
- Dative gli, le, loro (commonly gli) can be developed into a lui, a lei, a loro, when emphasized ("lo sai solo tu: a loro non l'ho detto" (only you know it: I have not told them))
- Dative gli combines with accusative lo, la, li, le and ne (partitive, meaning "of it" or "of them") to form glielo, gliela, glieli, gliele and gliene. These combinations are used for feminine and plural too ("Maria lo sa? Gliel'hai detto?" (Does Maria know it? Have you said it to her?)).
Combination of clitic pronouns
In Italian it is possible to append up to a maximum of two clitical pronouns. The word order is not trivial. The following table shows all possible combinations:
|Combination of clitic pronouns|
|Dative||(i) Dative II. (ii) Genitive
Example: Ecco l'uomo di cui mi innamorai! Te ne ho portato la foto! ("Here is the man I fell in love with! I brought the photo of him to you")
|Accusative||Not possible: just one of the two clitic pronouns is used.
|Instrumental||(i) Instrumental (ii) Genitive
Example: – Riuscirai a trasportare abbastanza mele con quel piccolo furgoncino? – Uomo di poca fede! Ce ne trasporterò quintali! ("– Will you be able to transport enough apples with such a small van? – Man of little faith! I will transport quintals of them with it")
|(i) Dative I. (ii) Instrumental
Italian infiniti presenti may end in one of these three endings, either -are, -ere, or -ire. Exceptions are also possible fare "to do/make" (from Latin facere), and verbs ending in -urre or -arre, most notably tradurre (Latin traducere) "to translate". Italian grammar does not have distinct forms to indicate specifically verbal aspect, though different verbal inflections and periphrases do render different aspects, in particular the perfective and imperfective aspects and the perfect tense–aspect combination. While the various inflected verbal forms convey a combination of tense (location in time), aspect, and mood, language-specific discussions generally refer to these inflectional forms as "tempi", for this reason it is impossible to make comparisons between the tenses of English verbs and the tempi of Italian verbs as there is no correspondence at all.
|Tense||Italian name||Example||English equivalent|
|Present||indicativo presente||faccio||I do
I am doing[verbs 1]
|Imperfect||indicativo imperfetto||facevo||I did/used to do
I was doing[verbs 2]
|Future||futuro semplice||farò||I will do|
|Preterite||passato remoto||feci||I did (historic)[verbs 3]|
|Present||condizionale presente||farei||I would do|
|Present||congiuntivo presente||(che) io faccia||(that) I do|
|Imperfect||congiuntivo imperfetto||(che) io facessi||(that) I did/do|
|Present||imperativo||fa'/fai!||do! (sing. informal)|
|Tense||Italian name||Example||English equivalent|
|Recent past||passato prossimo||ho fatto||I have done
|Recent pluperfect||trapassato prossimo||avevo fatto||I had done[verbs 4]|
|Future perfect||futuro anteriore||avrò fatto||I will have done|
|Remote pluperfect||trapassato remoto||ebbi fatto||I had done[verbs 4]|
|Preterite||condizionale passato||avrei fatto||I would have done|
|Preterite||congiuntivo passato||(che) io abbia fatto||(that) I did|
|Pluperfect||congiuntivo trapassato||(che) io avessi fatto||(that) I had done|
|Tense||Italian name||Example||English equivalent|
|Present||infinito presente||fare||to do|
|Past||infinito passato||aver fatto||to have done|
|Past||gerundio passato||avendo fatto||having done|
Aspect other than imperfective, aorist (that are rendered by simple tenses) and perfect (that is rendered by compound tenses) are rendered in Italian through periphrastical forms which aren't recognized by the canonical Italian grammar as proper tenses.
- Present tense, indicative mood, progressive aspect: io sto facendo (English: I'm doing)
- Present tense, indicative mood, prospective aspect: io sto per fare (English: I'm about to do)
- Although Italian does have a present continuous tense that is similar to the Present Continuous in English, it is not considered a tense per se in Italian. It is also used less frequently than in English, except when emphasizing the ongoing nature of the action.
- As with the present continuous, the past continuous in Italian is not a standard tense per se, and its use is considered interchangeable in most situations with the imperfetto (imperfect).
- The preterite is becoming obsolete in spoken Italian (as in French and, to some degree, German); instead, the present perfect (ho fatto) is used. It is still used in Southern Italy but becoming less common there, too. It is, however, very common in literature, even modern literature. If there is no reference to the present, as when speaking of the dead, the perfect is proscribed and the preterite must be used.
- The Trapassato Prossimo (Recent Pluperfect) and the extremely rare Trapassato Remoto (Remote Pluperfect) are separate tenses in Italian though not in English.
Compound tense auxiliary verbs
- La porta è stata aperta. ("The door has been opened.")
- La porta viene aperta. ("The door is being opened.")
For intransitive verbs a reliable rule cannot be given, although a useful rule of thumb is that if a verb's past participle can take on adjectival value, essere is used, otherwise avere. Also, reflexive verbs and unaccusative verbs use essere (typically non-agentive verbs of motion and change of state, i.e. involuntary actions like cadere ("to fall") or morire ("to die")).
The distinction between the two auxiliary verbs is important for the correct formation of the compound tenses and is essential to the agreement of the past participle. Some verbs use either, though, like vivere ("to live"): Io ho vissuto ("I have lived") can alternatively be expressed as, Io sono vissuto.
The past participle is used in Italian as both an adjective and to form many of the compound tenses of the language. There are regular endings for the past participle, based on the conjugation class (see below). There are, however, many irregular forms as not all verbs follow the pattern, particularly the -ere verbs. Some of the more common irregular past participles include: essere (to be) → stato (same for stare); fare (to do, to make) → fatto; dire (to say, to tell) → detto; aprire (to open) → aperto; chiedere (to ask) → chiesto; chiudere (to close) → chiuso; leggere (to read) → letto; mettere (to put) → messo; perdere (to lose) → perso; prendere (to take, to get) → preso; rispondere (to answer) → risposto; scrivere (to write) → scritto; vedere (to see) → visto.
For the intransitive verbs taking essere, the past participle always agrees with the subject—that is, it follows the usual adjective agreement rules: lui è partito; lei è partita. This is also true for reflexive verbs, the impersonal si construction (which, interestingly, requires any adjectives that refer to it to be in the masculine plural: Si è sempre stanchi alla fine della giornata - One is always tired at the end of the day), and the passive voice, which also use essere (Si è sparato - He shot himself, against Lui ha sparato - He shot).
The past participle when used with avere never changes to agree with the subject. It agrees with the object though, in sentences where a pronoun replacing the object precedes the verb (e.g. Hai mangiato la mela? - Sì, l'ho mangiata (Have you eaten the apple? - Yes, I have eaten it)).
When the pronoun is first or second person, there is optional agreement: Maria! Giovanni ti ha chiamato / chiamata? - No, non mi ha chiamato / chiamata (Maria! Has Giovanni called you? - No, he has not). In relative clauses, the agreement is obsolete: La storia che avete raccontata (obsolete) / raccontato non mi convince (The story you told does not convince me).
Tense relationship in subordinate sentences
Italian inherits consecutio temporum, a grammar rule from Latin that governs the relationship between the tenses in principal and subordinate clauses. Consecutio temporum has very rigid rules. These rules require the subjunctive tense in order to express contemporaneity, posteriority and anteriority in relation with the principal clause.
- To express contemporaneity when the principal clause is in a simple tense (future, present, or simple past,) the subordinate clause uses the present subjunctive, to express contemporaneity in the present.
- Penso che Davide sia intelligente. I think David is smart.
- When the principal clause has a past imperfect or perfect, the subordinate clause uses the imperfect subjunctive, expressing contemporaneity in the past.
- Pensavo che Davide fosse intelligente. I thought David was smart.
- To express anteriority when the principal clause is in a simple tense (future, or present or passato prossimo) the subordinate clause uses the past subjunctive.
- Penso che Davide sia stato intelligente. I think David has been smart.
- To express anteriority when the principal clause has a past imperfect or perfect, the subjunctive has to be pluperfect.
- Pensavo che Davide fosse stato intelligente. I thought David had been smart.
- To express posteriority the subordinate clause uses not the subjunctive but instead the indicative mood, because the subjunctive has no future tense.
- Penso che Davide sarà intelligente. I think David will be smart.
- To express posteriority with respect to a past event, the subordinate clause uses the past conditional, whereas in other European languages (such as French, English, and Spanish) the present conditional is used.
- Pensavo che Davide sarebbe stato intelligente. I thought that David would have been smart.
The infinitive of first conjugation verbs ends in -are, that of second conjugation verbs in -ere, and that of third conjugation verbs in -ire. In the following examples for different moods, the first conjugation verb is parlare (meaning to talk/speak), the second conjugation verb is temere (to fear) and the third conjugation verb is partire (to leave/depart.)
|1st Conj.||2nd Conj.||3rd Conj.||1st Conj.||2nd Conj.||3rd Conj.||1st Conj.||2nd Conj.||3rd Conj.||1st Conj.||2nd Conj.||3rd Conj.|
|Recent past = present of avere / essere + past participle||Remote pluperfect = preterite of avere / essere + past participle||Recent pluperfect = imperfect of avere / essere + past participle||Future perfect = simple future of avere / essere + past participle|
Some third conjugation verbs such as capire insert -isc- between the stem and the endings in the first, second, and third persons singular and third person plural of the present, e.g., capire -> capisco, capisci, capisce, capiamo, capite, capiscono. It is impossible to tell from the infinitive form which verbs exhibit this phenomenon, which often originated in Latin verbs denoting the "inchoative" aspect of an action, that is, verbs describing the beginning of an action. There are some 500 verbs like this, the first ones in alphabetic order being abbellire, abolire, agire, alleggerire, ammattire and so forth. In some grammatical systems, "isco" verbs are considered a fourth conjugation, often labelled 3b. There are also certain verbs that end in -rre, namely trarre, porre, (con)durre and derived verbs with different prefixes (such as attrarre, comporre, dedurre, and so forth). They are derived from earlier trahere, ponere, ducere and are conjugated as such.
The Italian subjunctive mood is used to indicate cases of desire, express doubt, make impersonal emotional statements, and to talk about impeding events.
|1st Conj.||2nd Conj.||3rd Conj.||1st Conj.||2nd Conj.||3rd Conj.|
|Past = present of avere / essere + past participle||Past perfect = imperfect of avere / essere + past participle|
- Third conjugation verbs like capire mentioned above insert -isc- in the first, second, and third persons singular and third person plural of the present.
- Compound forms (past and past perfect) are made by adding the past participle (e.g. parlato) to the corresponding auxiliary form (as "abbia") in the present and imperfect.
|1st Conj.||2nd Conj.||3rd Conj.|
|Past = present of avere / essere + past participle|
From the table we can see that the verbs each take their own root, from their class of verb, -are becomes -er-, -ere becomes -er-, and -ire becomes -ir-, the same roots as used in the future indicative tense. Onto this root, all verbs add on the same ending, depending on the conjugation.
Some verbs do not follow this pattern, but take irregular roots, these include: Andare (to go) ~ Andr-, Avere (to have) ~ Avr-, Bere (to drink) ~ Berr-, Dare (to give) ~ Dar-, Dovere (to have to) ~ Dovr-, Essere (to be) ~ Sar-, Fare (to make/do) ~ Far-, Godere (to enjoy) ~ Godr-, Potere (to be able to) ~ Potr-, Rimanere (to remain) ~ Rimarr-, Sapere (to know) ~ Sapr-, Sedere (to sit) ~ Sedr-, Stare (to be/feel) ~ Star-, Tenere (to hold) ~ Terr-, Vedere (to see) ~ Vedr-, Venire (to come) ~ Verr-, Vivere (to live) ~ Vivr-, Volere (to want) ~ Vorr- etc.
The Italian conditional mood is a mood that refers to an action that is possible or likely, but is dependent upon a condition. Example:
|Io andrei in spiaggia, ma fa troppo freddo.||("I would go to the beach, but it is too cold.")|
It can be used in two tenses, the present, by conjugation of the appropriate noun, or the past, using the auxiliary conjugated in the conditional, with the past participle of the appropriate noun:
|Mangerei un sacco adesso, se non stessi cercando di fare colpo su queste ragazze.||("I would eat a lot now, if I were not trying to impress these girls")|
|Sarei andato in città, se avessi saputo che ci andavano loro.||("I would have gone to the city, if I had known that they were going.")|
Many Italian speakers often use imperfect instead of conditional and subjunctive. While incorrect, this is somewhat tolerated in spoken Italian (rarely in written Italian, even if it used to be a correct form in past times):
|Se lo sapevo, andavo alla spiaggia||("If I had known it, I would have gone to the beach.")|
|Se Lucia non faceva quel segno, la risposta sarebbe probabilmente stata diversa.||("If Lucia had not made that sign, the answer would probably have been different.")|
The conditional can also be used in Italian to express "could", with the conjugated forms of potere ("to be able to"), "should", with the conjugated forms of dovere ("to have to"), or "would like", with the conjugated forms of "volere" (want):
|[Lui] potrebbe leggere un libro.||("He could read a book.")|
|[Loro] dovrebbero andare a letto.||("They should go to bed.")|
|Vorrei un bicchiere d'acqua, perfavore.||("I would like a glass of water, please.")|
|1st Conj.||2nd Conj.||3rd Conj.|
Verbs like capire insert -isc- in all except the noi and voi forms. Technically, the only real imperative forms are the 2nd persons singular and plural, with the other persons being borrowed from the present subjunctive.
- Infinitive: present: -are, -ere, -ire; past: avere/essere + past participle
- Gerund: present: -ando, -endo, -endo; past: avendo/essendo + past participle
- Participle: present: -ante -ente -ente; past: -ato, -uto (though verbs of the second conjugation almost always have a contracted desinence, e.g. "cuocere" (to cook) "cotto" (cooked)), -ito
While the majority of Italian verbs are regular, many of the most commonly used ones are irregular. In particular, the auxiliary verbs essere and avere, and the common modal verbs potere (ability, to be able to, can), dovere (duty, to have to, must), sapere (knowledge, to know how to) and volere (will, to want to) are all irregular. Many of the irregularities are accounted for by the substance of Latin grammar; in Latin the verb had four principal parts, of which the third and fourth (perfect stem and perfect passive participle) were formed regularly from the present stem only in the first and second conjugations, whereas in the third and fourth (in -ere with short e and in -ire) the presence of the i on the stem caused a mutation of the following consonants and made irregularities at a very early stage of the language.
The first conjugation has the majority of regular verbs (except "andare" (to go), "fare" (to do, to make (from third Latin conjugation)), "dare" (to give) and "stare" (to stay), which are strongly irregular). Almost every new verb (as neologism) enters in first conjugation (e.g. formattare (to format)) and is perfectly regular.
The second conjugation is usually irregular. The few regulars are from Latin second conjugation: like "temere" (to fear), "godere" (to enjoy)... The majority is from Latin third conjugation. Most of these have developed irregularities in Italian.
The third conjugation (deriving from Latin fourth conjugation) has two different ways: Greek one (or incohative) with insertion of -sc-, "capire" (to understand), "io capisco" (I understand), and Latin one with no insertion, "sentire" (to feel), "io sento" (I feel). There are some irregulars, but not too many: example, "morire" (to die), "io muoio" (I die). The verb "dire" (to say, to tell) derives from Latin third conjugation, and is strongly irregular.
Most verbs of the second conjugation are irregular in the passato remoto (preterite) tense, which resembles the Latin perfect.
An adjective can be made into a modal adverb by adding -mente (from Latin "mente", ablative of "mens" (mind), feminine noun) to the ending of the feminine singular form of the adjective. E.g. lenta "slow (feminine)" becomes lentamente "slowly". Adjectives ending in -re or -le lose their e before adding -mente (facile "easy" becomes facilmente "easily", particolare "particular" becomes particolarmente "particularly").
These adverbs can also be derived from the absolute superlative form of adjectives, e.g. lentissimamente ("very slowly"), facilissimamente ("very easily").
There is also a plethora of temporal, local, modal and interrogative adverbs, mostly derived from Latin, e.g. quando ("when"), dove ("where"), come ("how"), perché ("why"/"because"), mai ("never"), sempre ("always"), etc.
In modern Italian the prepositions tra and fra are interchangeable, and often chosen on the basis of euphony: tra fratelli ("among brothers") vs. fra i tralicci ("between the power pylons").
All the basic prepositions except tra, fra, per and con have to be combined with an article placed next to them.
|Italian||English||Preposition + article|
|di||of, from||del, dello, della, dell' / dei, degli, delle|
|a||to, at||al, allo, alla, all' / ai, agli, alle|
|da||from, by||dal, dallo, dalla, dall' / dai, dagli, dalle|
|in||in||nel, nello, nella, nell' / nei, negli, nelle|
|con||with||con il or col, con lo, con la, con l' / con i or coi, con gli, con le|
|su||on, about||sul, sullo, sulla, sull' / sui, sugli, sulle|
|per||for, through||per il, per lo, per la, per l' / per i, per gli, per le|
|tra / fra||between, among||tra il, tra lo, tra la, tra l' / tra i, tra gli, tra le|
Sentences and word order
Italian is an SVO language. Nevertheless, the SVO sequence is sometimes replaced by one of the other arrangements (SOV, VSO, OVS, etc.), especially for reasons of emphasis and, in literature, for reasons of style and metre: Italian has a relatively free word order.
The subject is usually omitted when it is a pronoun – distinctive verb conjugations make it redundant. Subject pronouns are considered emphatic when used at all.
Questions are formed by a rising intonation at the end of the sentence (in written form, a question mark). There is usually no other special marker, although wh-movement does usually occur. In general, intonation and context are important to recognize questions from affirmative statements.
|Davide è arrivato in ufficio.||(David has arrived at the office.)|
|Davide è arrivato in ufficio?||(Has David arrived at the office?)|
|Perché Davide è arrivato in ufficio?||(Why has David arrived at the office?)|
|Perché Davide è arrivato in ufficio.||(Because David has arrived at the office.)|
|È arrivato Davide in ufficio.||("It was David who arrived at the office" or "David arrived at the office" - depending on the intonation)|
|È arrivato Davide in ufficio?||(Has David, in particular, arrived at the office?)|
|È arrivato in ufficio.||(He has arrived at the office.)|
|(Lui/Egli) È arrivato in ufficio.||(He has arrived at the office.)|
|Chi è arrivato in ufficio?||(Who has arrived at the office?)|
In general, adjectives come after the noun they modify, adverbs after the verb. But: as with French, adjectives coming before the noun indicate essential quality of the noun. Demonstratives (e.g. questo this, quello that) come before the noun, and a few particular adjectives (e.g. bello) may be inflected like demonstratives and placed before the noun.
Disputed points in Italian grammar
Among sometimes proscribed Italian forms are:
- the usage of an indicative form where a subjunctive one is traditional; for instance: credo che Giorgio ieri fosse a casa ("I believe that yesterday George was at home") is considered proper, while credo che Giorgio ieri era a casa may not be; se Maria fosse stata a casa, le avrei telefonato ("if Mary had been at home, I would have telephoned her") is preferred, se Maria era a casa le telefonavo is often proscribed, despite being usage found in classic Italian writers
- use of the object forms (lui, lei, loro and Lei) of third person pronouns instead of the subject forms (egli, ella, essi and Ella), which are employed in formal language
- ma però despite this being a widespread spoken italian form, its formal usage is grammatically strictly proscribed because of the need of avoiding redundancy (since ma and però are synonyms).
Italian grammar books
The first Italian grammar was printed by Giovanni Francesco Fortunio in 1516 with the title Regole grammaticali della volgar lingua. Ever since, several Italian and foreign scholars have published works devoted to its description. Among others may be mentioned the famous Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti written by the philologist Gerhard Rohlfs, published at the end of the 1960s.
Among the most modern publications are those by Luca Serianni, in collaboration with Alberto Castelvecchi, Grammatica italiana. Suoni, forme, costrutti (Utet, Torino, 1998); and by Lorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi and Anna Cardinaletti, Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione (3 vol., Bologna, Il Mulino, 1988-1995).
- Accademia della Crusca, Guida alla scelta dell'articolo
- Accademia della Crusca, Articolo davanti a parole straniere inizianti per w e sw
- Self-geminating consonants are always long between vowels
- Accademia della Crusca, Sul plurale dei nomi in -cia e -gia e su una scelta d’autore
- Accademia della Crusca, Plurali difficili
- Serianni, Luca (1997). Italiano. Garzanti. ISBN 88-11-50470-8.
- Accademia della Crusca, Plurali doppi
- Accademia della Crusca, Sulla posizione dell'aggettivo qualificativo in italiano
- Accademia della Crusca, Impiego di Proprio e Suo'
- Accademia della Crusca, Sui pronomi di cortesia
- Maiden, Martin, M.Mair Parry. 1997. The dialects of Italy. P.113
- Compare also with other examples given by Pietro Bembo in Prose della volgar lingua (third book, p. 85, printed by Lodovico Castelvetro, Neaples, 1714):
- Io mi ti do in preda. ("I give myself to you as prisoner.")
- Ella ti si fè incontro. ("She approached herself to you.")
- Io son contento di darmiti prigione. ("I am happy to give myself to you as prisoner.")
- Accademia della Crusca, La scelta degli ausiliari
- Accademia della Crusca, Ausiliare con i verbi intransitivi
- Moretti, G. Battista; Orvieto, Giorgio R. (1983). Grammatica Italiana, vol. III. Benucci. pp. 70–71.
- Fornaciari, Raffaello (1881). Sintassi italiana. Florence. See an excerpt at "Grammatica italiana - L'imperfetto nelle frasi condizionali". Retrieved 2007-10-08.
- Alessandro Manzoni, I promessi sposi, chapter 3
- Michael Metzeltin (2004). Las lenguas románicas estándar: (historia de su formación y de su uso). Uviéu, Asturias: Academia Llingua Asturiana. p. 221. ISBN 84-8168-356-6.