J/psi meson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from J/ψ meson)
Jump to: navigation, search

Statistics Bosonic
Interactions Strong, weak, electromagnetic force, gravity
Antiparticle Self
Discovered SLAC: Burton Richter et al. (1974)
BNL: Samuel Ting et al. (1974)

5.5208×10−27 kg

3.096916 GeV/c2
Electric charge e
Spin 1

(J/psi) meson /ˈ ˈs ˈmzɒn/ or psion[1] is a subatomic particle, a flavor-neutral meson consisting of a charm quark and a charm antiquark. Mesons formed by a bound state of a charm quark and a charm anti-quark are generally known as "charmonium". The
is most common form of charmonium, due to its low rest mass. The
has a rest mass of 3.0969 GeV/c2, just above that of the
(2.9836 GeV/c2), and a mean lifetime of 7.2×10−21 s. This lifetime was about a thousand[2] times longer than expected.

Its discovery was made independently by two research groups, one at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, headed by Burton Richter, and one at the Brookhaven National Laboratory, headed by Samuel Ting of MIT. They discovered they had actually found the same particle, and both announced their discoveries on 11 November 1974. The importance of this discovery is highlighted by the fact that the subsequent, rapid changes in high-energy physics at the time have become collectively known as the "November Revolution". Richter and Ting were rewarded for their shared discovery with the 1976 Nobel Prize in Physics.

Background to discovery[edit]

J/ψ Production at Fermilab

The background to the discovery of the
was both theoretical and experimental. In the 1960s, the first quark models of elementary particle physics were proposed, which said that protons, neutrons and all other baryons, and also all mesons, are made from three kinds of fractionally-charged particles, the "quarks", that come in three different types or "flavors", called up, down, and strange. Despite the capability of quark models to bring order to the "elementary particle zoo", their status was considered something like mathematical fiction at the time, a simple artifact of deeper physical reasons.

Starting in 1969, deep inelastic scattering experiments at SLAC revealed surprising experimental evidence for particles inside of protons. Whether these were quarks or something else was not known at first. Many experiments were needed to fully identify the properties of the subprotonic components. To a first approximation, they were indeed the already-described quarks.

On the theoretical front, gauge theories with broken symmetry became the first fully viable contenders for explaining the weak interaction after Gerardus 't Hooft discovered in 1971 how to calculate with them beyond tree level. The first experimental evidence for these electroweak unification theories was the discovery of the weak neutral current in 1973. Gauge theories with quarks became a viable contender for the strong interaction in 1973 when the concept of asymptotic freedom was identified.

However, a naive mixture of electroweak theory and the quark model led to calculations about known decay modes that contradicted observation: in particular, it predicted Z boson-mediated flavor-changing decays of a strange quark into a down quark, which were not observed. A 1970 idea of Sheldon Glashow, John Iliopoulos, and Luciano Maiani, known as the GIM mechanism, showed that the flavor-changing decays would be strongly suppressed if there were a fourth quark, charm, that paired with the strange quark. This work led, by the summer of 1974, to theoretical predictions of what a charm/anticharm meson would be like. These predictions were ignored.[citation needed] The work of Richter and Ting was done for other[clarification needed] reasons, mostly to explore new energy regimes.[citation needed] In the Brookhaven group, Glenn Everhart, Terry Rhoades, Min Chen, and Ulrich Becker were the first to discern a peak at 3.1 GeV in plots of production rates. This was the first recognition of the "J".

The name[edit]

Because of the nearly simultaneous discovery, the
is the only particle to have a two-letter name. Richter named it "SP", after the SPEAR accelerator used at SLAC; however, none of his coworkers liked that name. After consulting with Greek-born Leo Resvanis to see which Greek letters were still available, and rejecting "iota" because its name implies insignificance, Richter chose "psi" – a name which, as Gerson Goldhaber pointed out, contains the original name "SP", but in reverse order.[3] Coincidentally, later spark chamber pictures often resembled the psi shape. Ting assigned the name "J" to it, which is one letter away from "K", the name of the already-known strange meson; possibly by coincidence, "J" strongly resembles the Chinese character for Ting's name (丁). J is also the first letter of Ting's oldest daughter's name, Jeanne.

Since the scientific community considered it unjust to give one of the two discoverers priority, most subsequent publications have referred to the particle as the "

The first excited state of the
was called the ψ′; it is now called the ψ(2S), indicating its quantum state. The next excited state was called the ψ″; it is now called ψ(3770), indicating mass in MeV. Other vector charm-anticharm states are denoted similarly with ψ and the quantum state (if known) or the mass.[4] The "J" is not used, since Richter's group alone first found excited states.

The name charmonium is used for the
and other charm-anticharm bound states. This is by analogy with positronium, which also consists of a particle and its antiparticle (an electron and positron in the case of positronium).


In a hot QCD medium, when the temperature is raised well beyond the Hagedorn temperature, the
and its excitations are expected to melt.[5] This is one of the predicted signals of the formation of the quark–gluon plasma. Heavy-ion experiments at CERN's Super Proton Synchrotron and at BNL's Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider have studied this phenomenon without a conclusive outcome as of 2009. This is due to the requirement that the disappearance of
mesons is evaluated with respect to the baseline provided by the total production of all charm quark-containing subatomic particles, and because it is widely expected that some
are produced and/or destroyed at time of QGP hadronization. Thus, there is uncertainty in the prevailing conditions at the initial collisions.

In fact, instead of suppression, enhanced production of
is expected[6] in heavy ion experiments at LHC where the quark-combinant production mechanism should be dominant given the large abundance of charm quarks in the QGP. Aside of
, charmed B mesons (
), offer a signature that indicates that quarks move freely and bind at-will when combining to form hadrons.[7][8]

Decay modes[edit]

Hadronic decay modes of
are strongly suppressed because of the OZI Rule. This effect strongly increases the lifetime of the particle and thereby gives it its very narrow decay width of just 93.2±2.1 keV. Because of this strong suppression, electromagnetic decays begin to compete with hadronic decays. This is why the
has a significant branching fraction to leptons.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ retrieved 25 September 2014
  2. ^ "Shared Physics prize for elementary particle" (Press release). The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. 18 October 1976. Retrieved 2012-04-23. 
  3. ^ Zielinski, L (8 August 2006). "Physics Folklore". QuarkNet. Retrieved 2009-04-13. 
  4. ^ Roos, M; Wohl, CG; (Particle Data Group) (2004). "Naming schemes for hadrons" (PDF). Retrieved 2009-04-13. 
  5. ^ Matsui, T; Satz, H (1986). "J/ψ suppression by quark-gluon plasma formation". Physics Letters B. 178 (4): 416–422. Bibcode:1986PhLB..178..416M. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91404-8. 
  6. ^ Thews, R. L.; Schroedter, M.; Rafelski, J. (2001). "Enhanced J/ψ production in deconfined quark matter". Physical Review C. 63 (5): 054905. arXiv:hep-ph/0007323Freely accessible. Bibcode:2001PhRvC..63e4905T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.63.054905. 
  7. ^ Schroedter, M.; Thews, R. L.; Rafelski, J. (2000). "Bc-meson production in ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions". Physical Review C. 62 (2): 024905. arXiv:hep-ph/0004041Freely accessible. Bibcode:2000PhRvC..62b4905S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.62.024905. 
  8. ^ Fulcher, L. P.; Rafelski, J.; Thews, R. L. (1999). "Bc mesons as a signal of deconfinement". arXiv:hep-ph/9905201Freely accessible [hep-ph].