James K. Polk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the U.S. president. For other uses, see James Polk (disambiguation).
James K. Polk
James Knox Polk by GPA Healy, 1858.jpg
11th President of the United States
In office
March 4, 1845 – March 4, 1849
Vice President George M. Dallas
Preceded by John Tyler
Succeeded by Zachary Taylor
9th Governor of Tennessee
In office
October 14, 1839 – October 15, 1841
Preceded by Newton Cannon
Succeeded by James C. Jones
13th Speaker of the United States House of Representatives
In office
December 7, 1835 – March 4, 1839
President Andrew Jackson
Martin Van Buren
Preceded by John Bell
Succeeded by Robert M. T. Hunter
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Tennessee's 9th district
In office
March 4, 1833 – March 4, 1839
Preceded by William Fitzgerald
Succeeded by Harvey Magee Watterson
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Tennessee's 6th district
In office
March 4, 1825 – March 4, 1833
Preceded by John Alexander Cocke
Succeeded by Balie Peyton
Personal details
Born James Knox Polk
(1795-11-02)November 2, 1795
Pineville, North Carolina, U.S.
Died June 15, 1849(1849-06-15) (aged 53)
Nashville, Tennessee, U.S.
Resting place Tennessee State Capitol
Nashville, Tennessee
Political party Democratic
Spouse(s) Sarah Childress (m. 1824)
Alma mater University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Profession Lawyer
Planter
Signature Cursive signature in ink
The house where Polk spent his adult life before his presidency, in Columbia, Tennessee, is his only private residence still standing. It is now known as the James K. Polk Ancestral Home.

James Knox Polk (November 2, 1795 – June 15, 1849) was the 11th President of the United States (1845–49). Polk was born in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.[1] He later lived in and represented Tennessee. A Democrat, Polk served as the 13th Speaker of the House of Representatives (1835–39)—the only president to have served as House Speaker—and Governor of Tennessee (1839–41). Polk was the surprise (dark horse) candidate for president in 1844, defeating Henry Clay of the rival Whig Party by promising to annex the Republic of Texas. Polk was a leader of Jacksonian Democracy during the Second Party System.

Polk is often considered the last strong pre–Civil War president, having met during his four years in office every major domestic and foreign policy goal set during his campaign and the transition to his administration. When Mexico rejected the U.S. annexation of Texas (which Mexico considered part of its territory, despite the 1836 Texas Revolution), Polk led the nation to a sweeping victory in the Mexican–American War, which resulted in the cession by Mexico of nearly the whole of what is now the American Southwest. He ensured a substantial reduction of tariff rates by replacing the "Black Tariff" with the Walker tariff of 1846, which pleased the less-industrialized states of his native South by rendering less expensive both imported and, through competition, domestic goods. He threatened war with the United Kingdom over the issue of which nation owned the Oregon Country, eventually reaching a settlement in which the British were made to sell the portion that became the Oregon Territory. Additionally, he built an independent treasury system that lasted until 1913, oversaw the opening of the U.S. Naval Academy and of the Smithsonian Institution, the groundbreaking for the Washington Monument, and the issuance of the first United States postage stamp.

True to his campaign pledge to serve only one term as President, Polk left office and returned to Tennessee in March 1849. He died of cholera three months later.

Scholars have ranked him favorably on lists of greatest presidents for his ability to promote, obtain support for, and achieve all of the major items on his presidential agenda. Polk has been called the "least known consequential president"[2] of the United States.

Early life[edit]

James Knox Polk, the first of ten children, was born on November 2, 1795 in a log house[3][1] in what is now Pineville, North Carolina in Mecklenburg County, just outside Charlotte.[4] (Further information: President James K. Polk Historic Site) His father, Samuel Polk, was a slaveholder, successful farmer and surveyor of Scots-Irish descent. His mother, Jane Polk (née Knox), was a descendant of a brother of the Scottish religious reformer John Knox. She named her firstborn after her father James Knox.[4] Like most early Scots-Irish settlers in the North Carolina mountains, the Knox and Polk families were Presbyterian. While Jane remained a devout Presbyterian her entire life, Samuel (whose father, Ezekiel Polk, was a deist) rejected dogmatic Presbyterianism. When the parents took James to church to be baptized, the father Samuel refused to declare his belief in Christianity, and the minister refused to baptize the child.[4][5] In 1803, most of Polk's relatives moved to the Duck River area in what is now Maury County, Middle Tennessee; Polk's family waited until 1806 to follow.[6] The family grew prosperous, with Samuel Polk turning to land speculation and becoming a county judge.[6]

Polk was home schooled.[6] His health was problematic and in 1812 his pain became so unbearable that he was taken to Dr. Ephraim McDowell of Danville, Kentucky, who operated to remove urinary stones.[7] Polk was awake during the operation with nothing but brandy available for anesthetic, but it was successful. The surgery may have left Polk sterile, as he did not sire any children.[8]

When Polk recovered, his father offered to bring him into the mercantile business, but Polk refused.[7] In July 1813, Polk enrolled at the Zion Church near his home. A year later he attended an academy in Murfreesboro, where he may have met his future wife, Sarah Childress.[9] At Murfreesboro, Polk proved a promising student. In January 1816, he transferred and was admitted into the University of North Carolina as a second-semester sophomore. The Polks had connections with the university, then a small school of about 80 students: Sam Polk was their land agent for Tennessee, and his cousin, William Polk, was a trustee.[10] While there, Polk joined the Dialectic Society where he regularly took part in debates and learned the art of oratory. His roommate William Dunn Moseley later became the first governor of Florida. Polk graduated with honors in May 1818.[11] The University later named the lower quad on its main campus, Polk Place.[12]

After graduation, Polk traveled to Nashville to study law under renowned Nashville trial attorney Felix Grundy.[13] Grundy became Polk's first mentor. On September 20, 1819, Polk, with Grundy's endorsement, was elected clerk for the Tennessee State Senate.[14] Polk was reelected as clerk in 1821 without opposition, and would continue to serve until 1822. Polk was licensed to practice law in June 1820. His first case was to defend his father against a public fighting charge. He secured his client's release for a one-dollar fine.[14] Polk's practice was successful, in large part due to the many cases arising from debts after the Panic of 1819.[15]

Early political career[edit]

In 1822 Polk joined the Tennessee militia as a captain in the cavalry regiment of the 5th Brigade. He was later appointed a colonel on the staff of Governor William Carroll, and was afterwards often referred to or addressed by his military title.[16][17] Polk's oratory became popular, earning him the nickname "Napoleon of the Stump." In 1822 Polk resigned his position as clerk to run his successful campaign for the Tennessee state legislature in 1823, in which he defeated incumbent William Yancey, becoming the new representative of Maury County.[16][18] In October 1823 Polk voted for Andrew Jackson, a family friend and fellow Tennessean,[19] to become the next United States Senator from Tennessee.[20] Jackson won and Polk became a strong supporter of Jackson's political career and an advocate for Jackson's ideas.[21][22]

James K. Polk and Sarah Childress Polk.

Polk courted Sarah Childress, and they married on January 1, 1824 in Murfreesboro.[18] Polk was then 28, and Sarah was 20 years old. They had no children. During Polk's political career, Sarah assisted her husband with his speeches, gave him advice on policy matters and played an active role in his campaigns. An old story told that Andrew Jackson had encouraged their romance when they began to court.[23]

In 1824, Jackson ran for President but was defeated.[24] Though Jackson had won the popular vote, neither he nor any of the other candidates (John Quincy Adams, Henry Clay, and William H. Crawford) had won a majority of the electoral vote. The House of Representatives then had to select the verdict; Clay, who had received the least amount of electoral votes and dropped from the ballot, supported Adams.[24] Clay's support proved to be the deciding factor in the House and Adams was elected President.[24] Adams then offered Clay a position in the Cabinet as Secretary of State.[24] Jackson and Polk strongly criticized the sequence of events (which became known as the "Corrupt Bargain").[25]

In 1825, Polk ran for the United States House of Representatives for the Tennessee's 6th congressional district.[26] Polk vigorously campaigned in the district. Polk was so active that Sarah began to worry about his health.[26] During the campaign, Polk's opponents said that at the age of 29 Polk was too young for a spot in the House, but he won the election and took his seat in Congress.[26] When Polk arrived in Washington, D.C. he roomed in Benjamin Burch's boarding house with some other Tennessee representatives, including Sam Houston. Polk made his first major speech on March 13, 1826, in which he said that the Electoral College should be abolished and that the President should be elected by the popular vote.[27] After Congress went into recess in the summer of 1826, Polk returned to Tennessee to see Sarah, and when Congress met again in the autumn, Polk returned to Washington with Sarah. In 1827 Polk was reelected to Congress.[28] In 1828, Jackson ran for President again and during the campaign Polk and Jackson corresponded, with Polk giving Jackson advice on his campaign. Following Jackson's victory in the 1828 election, Polk became one of Jackson's most important and loyal supporters in the House, and Polk served as a key Jackson ally in the "Bank War" that developed over Jackson's opposition to the re-authorization of the Second Bank of the United States.[29] In 1833, after being elected to a fifth consecutive term, Polk became the chair of the House Ways and Means Committee.[30] In this role, Polk served as Jackson's most prominent House ally in the Bank War, engaging in an intense battle to defend Jackson's actions.[31]

Speaker of the House[edit]

In June 1834, Speaker of the House Andrew Stevenson resigned, leaving the spot for Speaker open.[32] With Jackson's support Polk ran against fellow Tennessean John Bell for Speaker.[33] Bell ultimately won the Speaker election after ten ballots. Bell's victory over Polk represented the beginning of a rising anti-Jacksonian force in Tennessee.[34] However, in 1835, Polk defeated Bell in a re-match for the Speaker office.[35] After the election, Bell and another prominent Tennessee politician, Senator Hugh Lawson White, formed a strong Tennessee Whig Party organization in opposition to Jackson's Democrats.[36]

Polk worked for Jackson's policies as speaker, and Van Buren's when he succeeded Jackson in 1837; Polk appointed committees with Democratic chairs and majorities, including the New York radical C. C. Cambreleng as Chair of the Ways and Means Committee, although he maintained the facade of traditional bipartisanship.[37] The two major issues during Polk's speakership were slavery and, after the Panic of 1837, the economy. Van Buren and Polk faced pressure to rescind the Specie Circular, an act that had been signed by Jackson to boost the economy. The act required that payment for government lands be in gold and silver. However, with support from Polk and his cabinet, Van Buren chose to stick with the Specie Circular.[38]

Polk attempted to make a more orderly house. Unlike many of his peers, he never challenged anyone to a duel no matter how much they insulted his honor.[39] Polk also issued the gag rule on petitions from abolitionists.[39] After seven terms in the House, Polk announced that he would not seek re-election, choosing instead to run for Governor of Tennessee.[40] Polk remains the only president who served as Speaker of the House.

Governor of Tennessee[edit]

In 1838, the political situation in Tennessee—where, in 1835, Democrats had lost the governorship for the first time in their party's history—persuaded Polk to return to help the party at home.[41] Leaving Congress in 1839, Polk became a candidate in the Tennessee gubernatorial election, defeating the two-term incumbent Whig, Newton Cannon by about 2,500 votes, out of about 105,000.[42]

Polk's three major programs during his governorship; regulating state banks, implementing state internal improvements, and improving education all failed to win the approval of the legislature.[43] Polk's tenure as governor was hindered by the continuing nationwide economic crisis that had followed the Panic of 1837, and the Democrats and Van Buren lost the presidential election of 1840.[44] In the election, Polk received one electoral vote from Tennessee for Vice President, as Van Buren lacked an official running mate.[45] Polk sought re-election in 1841 against the Whig candidate, James C. Jones. Jones, an entertaining story teller who had emerged in the legislature as one of Polk's most persistent opponents, defeated Polk by 3,243 votes.[46] Polk challenged Jones to a re-match in 1843, campaigning across the state and publicly debating against Jones, but was defeated again, this time by a slightly greater margin of 3,833 votes.[47][48] Polk was stung by the first two losses of his political career, and faced an uncertain political future.[46]

Election of 1844[edit]

1844 campaign banner, produced by Nathaniel Currier

Following his 1843 gubernatorial loss, Polk became determined to become the next Vice President of the United States.[49] Van Buren was the frontrunner for the 1844 Democratic nomination, and Polk engaged in a delicate and subtle campaign to become Van Buren's running mate.[50] Though Van Buren had the stature of a former president and was widely seen as the frontrunner, he faced opposition from Southerners who feared his views on slavery, while Van Buren's favorable position on hard money and his handling of the Panic of 1837 also aroused opposition from "entrepreneurial conservatives."[50] Many Southerners supported the candidacy of former Vice President John C. Calhoun of South Carolina, the entrepreneurial conservatives rallied around Senator Lewis Cass of Michigan, and former Vice President Richard Mentor Johnson also maintained a strong following among Democrats.[50] A key aspect of Polk's strategy to become vice president was winning control of the Tennessee delegation to the 1844 Democratic National Convention.[51] Polk defeated a challenge for the state party's leadership by former Senator Alfred O. P. Nicholson, and Polk instructed the Tennessee delegates to support his vice presidential nomination while remaining neutral on the presidency, thus opening up the possibility of a deal between Polk and Van Buren in which Van Buren would choose Polk as his running mate in exchange for the Tennessee delegation's votes.[51] Polk's maneuvering was opposed at the national level by two powerful Senators, Thomas Hart Benton of Missouri and James Buchanan of Pennsylvania, both of whom sought a vice president of a lesser stature so as to clear the way for their own respective presidential candidacies in 1848.[52] The potential annexation of the Republic of Texas by President John Tyler upended the presidential race; while Van Buren and the Whig frontrunner, Henry Clay, opposed the annexation and a potential war with Mexico over the disputed territory,[53] Polk and Andrew Jackson strongly supported territorial acquisition.[54] Disappointed by Van Buren's position, Jackson instead decided to support Polk as the party's presidential candidate in the 1844 election, though Polk was skeptical that he could win that nomination.[55] However, as Van Buren continued to receive opposition from the West and South, Polk's key lieutenant at the convention, Gideon Johnson Pillow, noted the possibility of Polk emerging as a compromise presidential nominee.[56]

As the convention began on May 27, 1836, the key question was whether the convention would adopt a rule requiring the presidential nominee to receive the vote of 2/3 of the delegates.[57] With the strong support of the Southern states, the two thirds rule was passed by the convention, effectively ending the possibility of Van Buren's nomination due to the strong opposition he faced.[58] Van Buren won a majority on the first presidential ballot, but failed to win the necessary supermajority, and support for Van Buren faded on subsequent ballots.[58] Cass, Johnson, Calhoun, and Buchanan also received votes on the first ballot, and Cass took the lead after the fifth ballot.[59] As the balloting continued, anti-Cass forces from the Northeast led by George Bancroft rallied support for Polk.[60] On the eighth presidential ballot, Polk won 44 of the 266 delegates, as support for all candidates other than Polk, Cass, and Van Buren dissipated.[61] Following the eighth ballot, several delegates rose to give supportive speeches of Polk's candidacy, and Polk won the presidential nomination on the ninth ballot.[61] After Senator Silas Wright of New York, a close Van Buren ally, declined the vice presidential nomination, the convention nominated former Senator George M. Dallas of Pennsylvania.[62]

Polk had not attended the convention, and when he learned of his nomination, Polk stated: "It has been well observed that the office of President of the United States should neither be sought nor declined. I have never sought it, nor should I feel at liberty to decline it, if conferred upon me by the voluntary suffrages of my fellow citizens." Because the Democratic Party was splintered into bitter factions, Polk promised to serve only one term if elected, hoping that his disappointed rival Democrats would unite behind him with the knowledge that another candidate would be chosen in four years.[63] The Whigs publicly scorned Polk with the chant "Who is James K. Polk?" in reference to Polk's relative obscurity.[64] Though Polk had experience as Speaker of the House and Governor of Tennessee, all previous successful presidential nominees had served as Vice President, Secretary of State, or as a high-ranking general. Polk has been described as the first "dark horse" presidential nominee, but his nomination was less of a surprise that that of many future presidential nominees such as Franklin Pierce.[65] Despite his party's gibes, Henry Clay, the Whig presidential nominee and himself a former Secretary of State, recognized that Polk could unify the Democrats for the 1844 election.[64]

Results of the 1844 Presidential election

Incumbent President John Tyler—a former Democrat and Whig—had been expelled from the Whig Party in September 1841. Despite Polk's support of the annexation of Texas, Tyler considered running an independent re-election campaign, but he agreed to withdraw after Jackson encouraged Democrats to welcome Tyler's followers into the party.[66] With the threat of a Tyler candidacy averted, Polk focused his efforts on unifying the Democratic Party. When he officially accepted the nomination, Polk announced that he would serve only one term.[67] Polk hoped that this would win him the backing of Democratic leaders such as Cass, Calhoun, Benton, Buchanan, and Silas Wright, all of whom were interested in seeking the presidency in the election of 1848.[67] Polk avoided taking a position on the protectionist Tariff of 1842, but appealed to the key state of Pennsylvania by using rhetoric favorable towards tariffs.[68] In New York, another key swing state, Polk's campaign was greatly aided by the gubernatorial candidacy of Wright, who managed to unite the factions of the New York Democratic Party.[68] The potential annexation of Texas also threatened to divide the party between North and South, but Polk managed to appease most Southern party leaders without antagonizing Northern party leaders.[69] As the election drew closer, it became clear that most of the country favored the annexation of Texas, and some Southern Whig leaders supported Polk's campaign due to Clay's anti-annexation stance.[69] In June 1844, Clay attempted to hedge his position on annexation, but this attempt alienated anti-annexation Northerners while doing little to appease pro-annexation forces.[70] Polk won the election with 49.5% of the popular vote and 170 of the 275 electoral votes.[70]

Polk lost both his birth state, North Carolina, and his state of residence, Tennessee, the most recent successful presidential candidate to do so. However, he won Pennsylvania and New York, where Clay lost votes to the antislavery Liberty Party candidate James G. Birney.[70] Also contributing to Polk's victory was the support of new immigrant voters, who opposed the Whigs' policies. Polk won the popular vote by a margin of about 39,000 out of 2.6 million, and took the Electoral College with 170 votes to Clay's 105.[71] Polk won 15 states, while Clay won 11.[72]

After being informed of his victory on November 15, 1844, Polk turned his attention towards forming a geographically-balanced Cabinet.[73] Polk decided that his Cabinet would not consist of presidential aspirants, though he chose to nominate Buchanan for the crucial and prestigious position of Secretary of State.[74] Polk wrote Van Buren and Wright with the intention of appointing an acceptable New Yorker to the position of Secretary of the Treasury, and the two recommended Azariah C. Flagg.[75] Polk decided to nominate Senator Robert J. Walker of Mississippi to the position of Attorney General.[75] Cave Johnson, a close friend and ally of Polk, would be nominated for the position of Postmaster General.[75] Though Polk was personally close with the incumbent Navy Secretary, John Y. Mason, Polk sought to replace him due to Jackson's insistence that none of Tyler's Cabinet be retained.[75] In his place, Polk would nominate George Bancroft, the historian who had placed a crucial role in Polk's nomination.[75] For the position of Secretary of War, Polk sought to appoint Andrew Stevenson of Virginia, giving Polk's potential Cabinet three slave state leaders and three free state leaders.[75] Polk's Cabinet choices met with the approval of Andrew Jackson, who Polk met with in January 1845 for the last time, as Jackson would die in June 1845.[75] However, after news of Buchanan's selection for State was leaked, Vice President Dallas (an in-state rival of Buchanan) and a slew of Southerners insisted that Walker receive the higher position at Treasury.[76] Polk instead chose to nominate Bancroft as a compromise at Treasury while nominating Mason as Attorney General and a New Yorker, William L. Marcy, as Secretary of War.[76] Polk had intended the Marcy appointment to mollify Van Buren, but Van Buren was outraged at the move, in part due to Marcy's affiliation with the rival "Hunker" faction.[76] Polk then further enraged Van Buren by finally choosing to elevate Walker to Treasury, and Van Buren and Silas Wright became alienated from the incoming Polk administration.[77] Thus, Polk's initial Cabinet selections would consist of Buchanan as Secretary of State, Walker as Secretary of the Treasury, Marcy as Secretary of War, Mason as Attorney General, Cave Johnson as Postmaster General, and Bancroft as Secretary of the Navy. All would win Senate confirmation after Polk took office.

While Polk put together his Cabinet, President Tyler sought to complete the annexation of Texas. While the Senate had defeated an earlier treaty that would annex the republic, Tyler sought to pass a joint resolution through both houses of Congress.[78] Due to disagreements regarding the extension of slavery, Senator Benton of Missouri and Secretary of State Calhoun disagreed on the best way to annex Texas, and Polk became involved in negotiations to break the impasse.[78] With Polk's help, the annexation resolution narrowly cleared the Senate.[78] In a surprise move two days before Polk's inauguration, Tyler extended to Texas a formal offer of annexation.[79]

Presidency (1845–1849)[edit]

The inauguration of James K. Polk, as shown in the Illustrated London News, v. 6, April 19, 1845.

When he took office on March 4, 1845, Polk, at 49, became the youngest man at the time to assume the presidency. Polk's inauguration was the first inaugural ceremony to be reported by telegraph and to be shown in a newspaper illustration (in The Illustrated London News).[80] Polk presided over a country whose population had doubled every twenty years since the American Revolution and which had reached demographic parity with its former colonial overlord, Great Britain.[81] Polk's tenure saw continued technological improvements, including the continued expansion of railroads and increased use of the telegraph.[81] These improved communications and growing demographics increasingly made the United States into a military power, while also stoking expansionism.[82]

According to a story told decades later by George Bancroft, Polk set four clearly defined goals for his administration:[82]

While his domestic aims represented continuity with past Democratic policies, successful completion of Polk's foreign policy goals would represent the first major American territorial gains since the Adams–Onís Treaty of 1819.[82] Pledged to serve only one term, Polk accomplished his four major objectives in just four years. By linking acquisition of new lands in Oregon (with no slavery) and Texas (with slavery), he hoped to satisfy both North and South.

During his presidency James K. Polk was known as "Young Hickory", an allusion to his mentor Andrew Jackson, and "Napoleon of the Stump" for his speaking skills.

Personnel[edit]

Administration and cabinet[edit]

Polk and his cabinet in the White House dining room.
Front row, left to right: John Y. Mason, William L. Marcy, James K. Polk, Robert J. Walker
Back row, left to right: Cave Johnson, George Bancroft
Secretary of State James Buchanan is absent.

Polk governed with the help of his Cabinet, in which he placed great importance.[83] The Cabinet regularly met twice a week, and Polk and his six Cabinet members discussed all major issues during these meetings.[83] Mason and Johnson were long-time allies of Polk who were dedicated to his interests, while Walker and Buchanan were important Democratic leaders.[83] Though Polk respected Buchanan's opinion and Buchanan played an important role in Polk's presidency, the two frequently clashed over foreign policy and appointments.[84] Polk frequently considered dismissing Buchanan from office, as he suspected Buchanan of placing his own presidential aspirations above service to Polk, but Buchanan always managed to convince Polk of his loyalty.[85] Marcy had not known Polk well before Polk's presidency, but emerged as an able and loyal member of Polk's Cabinet.[83] After the outbreak of the Mexican-American War, Polk shook up his Cabinet, sending Bancroft to Great Britain as an ambassador, shifting Mason to his old position of Navy Secretary, and successfully nominating Nathan Clifford as Attorney General.[86] Despite his reliance on his Cabinet, Polk involved himself in the minutiae of the various departments, especially regarding the military.[87]

The Polk Cabinet
Office Name Term
President James K. Polk 1845–1849
Vice President George M. Dallas 1845–1849
Secretary of State James Buchanan 1845–1849
Secretary of Treasury Robert J. Walker 1845–1849
Secretary of War William L. Marcy 1845–1849
Attorney General John Y. Mason 1845–1846
Nathan Clifford 1846–1848
Isaac Toucey 1848–1849
Postmaster General Cave Johnson 1845–1849
Secretary of the Navy George Bancroft 1845–1846
John Y. Mason 1846–1849

Judicial appointments[edit]

Robert Cooper Grier, one of President Polk's two appointees to the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court[edit]

Polk appointed the following Justices to the U.S. Supreme Court:

Justice Position Began active
service
Ended active
service
Levi Woodbury Seat 2 18450920September 20, 1845[88] 18510904September 4, 1851
Robert Cooper Grier Seat 3 18460804August 4, 1846 18700131January 31, 1870

Polk nominated both George W. Woodward of Pennsylvania and Levi Woodbury of New Hampshire in December 1845. Woodbury was confirmed, but Woodward was rejected by the Senate in 1846. Woodward's nomination was defeated in large part due to the opposition of Buchanan and Pennsylvania Senator Simon Cameron.[89] Polk subsequently nominated Robert Cooper Grier of Pennsylvania, and Grier won confirmation. Woodbury died in 1851, but Grier served until 1870 and notably joined with the majority decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford.

Other judicial appointments[edit]

Polk appointed eight other federal judges, one to the United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia, and seven to various United States district courts.

States admitted to the Union[edit]

Foreign policy[edit]

Polk strongly supported expansion, and relations with Mexico and Great Britain, the country's southern and northern neighbors respectively, dominated Polk's presidency. Polk, like many other Democrats, fervently believed in the idea of Manifest Destiny, and he sought to create a bicoastal nation. Polk was successful in pursuing this goal, as his presidency saw the partition of Oregon Country with Britain, the annexation of Texas, and the acquisition of vast amounts of land from Mexico.

Partition of Oregon Country[edit]

Map of Oregon Country, which the Oregon Treaty split between the Americans and British at the 49th parallel

Since the signing of the Treaty of 1818, the Oregon Country had been under the joint occupation and control of the United Kingdom and the United States. Previous U.S. administrations had offered to divide the region along the 49th parallel, which was not acceptable to Britain, as they had commercial interests along the Columbia River.[90] Britain's preferred partition was unacceptable to Polk, as it would have awarded the Puget Sound and all lands North of the Columbia River to Britain.[90] Edward Everett, President Tyler's ambassador to Great Britain, had proposed a new solution that would divide most of the territory at the 49th parallel but grant the strategic Vancouver Island to the British, but Tyler's term ended before negotiations could proceed.[91] Though both sides sought an acceptable compromise, each also saw the territory as an important geopolitical asset that would play a large part in determining the dominant power in North America.[90] On taking office, Polk announced that he viewed the American claim to the land as "clear and unquestionable," provoking threats of war from British leaders should Polk attempt to take control of the entire territory.[91] Despite Polk's hawkish rhetoric and desire to annex the entire territory, he viewed war with the British as unwise and unnecessary, and Polk and Buchanan opened up negotiations with the British.[92] Like his predecessors, Polk again proposed a division along the 49th parallel, which was immediately rejected by the British ambassador, Richard Pakenham.[93]

After Pakenham's rejection, Polk broke off negotiations and returned to the Democratic platform's "All Oregon" demand (which called for all of Oregon up to the 54-40 line that marked the southern boundary of Russian Alaska). "54-40 or fight!" now became a popular rallying cry among Democrats.[94] Secretary of State Buchanan was wary of a two-front war with both Mexico and Britain, but Polk was willing to risk war with both countries in pursuit of a favorable settlement.[95] As 1845 came to an end, Polk began preparations to give Britain a one-year notice (as required in the Treaty of 1818) of his intention to terminate the joint occupancy of Oregon.[96]

When the British Foreign Secretary, Lord Aberdeen, learned of the proposal rejected by Pakenham, Aberdeen asked the United States to re-open negotiations.[97] Polk refused to put forward another proposal, but left open the possibility of a British counter-offer.[97] On Buchanan's urging, Polk agreed to the proposition that if the British offered an agreement similar to Edward Everett's proposal, Polk would consider submitting the proposal to the Senate.[98] The negotiations with the British aroused a heated debate in Congress.[99] While westerners such as Lewis Cass continued to demand all of Oregon, Polk faced increasing pressure from southerners such as John C. Calhoun who feared that war with the British would interfere with the cotton trade.[98]

After the brief collapse of British Prime Minister Robert Peel's second ministry, Peel and Aberdeen sought closer relations with the United States as part of a re-orientation towards free trade.[100] In March 1846, Polk allowed Buchanan to inform Louis McLane, the American ambassador to Britain, that Polk's administration would look favorably on a British proposal based around a division at the 49th parallel.[101] In June 1846, Pakenham presented an offer to the Polk administration, calling for a boundary line at the 49th parallel, with the exception that Britain would retain all of Vancouver Island, and limited navigation rights for British subjects on the Columbia River.[102] Polk and his most of his Cabinet were prepared to accept the proposal, but Buchanan, in a surprising reversal, urged that the United States seek control of all of the Oregon Territory.[102] After winning the reluctant approval of Buchanan and many of Polk's Senate allies, Polk submitted the full treaty to the Senate for ratification.[103] The Senate ratified the treaty in a 41-14 vote.[103] After years of negotiations, the United States and Great Britain had finally settled the Oregon question.[103] Polk's willingness to risk war with Britain had frightened many, but his tough negotiation tactics may have gained the United States concessions from the British (particularly regarding the Columbia River) that a more conciliatory president might not have won.[103]

The portion of the Oregon Territory acquired by the United States later formed the states of Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, and parts of the states of Montana and Wyoming. The borders established by the Oregon Treaty now constitute a portion of the Canada–United States border.

Annexation of Texas[edit]

Main article: Texas Annexation
Map of Mexico in 1845, with the Republic of Texas, the Republic of Yucatan and the disputed territory between Mexico and Texas in red. Mexico claimed to own all of Texas.

The Republic of Texas had gained independence from Mexico following the Texas Revolution of 1836. Many Texians had migrated from the United States, and many Americans and Texians sought to make Texas a part of America following the Texas Revolution. Upon hearing of Polk's election to office, President Tyler had urged Congress to pass a joint resolution admitting Texas to the Union, and Congress complied on February 28, 1845. Polk's first major decision in office was whether to recall Tyler's emissary to Texas who bore an offer of annexation based on that act of Congress.[104] Though it was within Polk's power to recall the messenger, he chose to allow the emissary to continue, with the hope that Texas would accept the offer.[104] Polk also retained the United States Ambassador to Texas, Andrew Jackson Donelson, who sought to convince the Texan leaders to accept annexation under the terms proposed by the Tyler administration.[105] Though public sentiment in Texas favored annexation, some Texas leaders disliked the strict terms for annexation, which offered little leeway for negotiation and gave public lands to the federal government.[106] However, in July 1845, a convention in Austin, Texas ratified the annexation of Texas.[107] In December 1845, Polk signed a resolution annexing Texas, and Texas became the 28th state in the union.[98] The annexation of Texas would lead to increased tensions with Mexico, which had never recognized Texan independence.

Mexican-American War[edit]

Origins of the war[edit]

Perhaps the most important event of Polk's presidency was the Mexican-American War. Though the United States had been the first country to recognize Mexico's independence following the Mexican War of Independence, relations between the two countries began to sour in the 1830s.[108] In the 1830s and 1840s, the United States, like France and Britain, sought a reparations treaty with Mexico for various acts committed by Mexican citizens and authorities, including the seizure of American ships.[108] Though the United States and Mexico had agreed to a joint board to settle the various claims prior to Polk's presidency, many Americans accused the Mexican government of acting in bad faith.[108] For its part, Mexico saw many Americans as desirous of the acquisition of Alta California and of filing specious or exaggerated claims.[108] The already-troubled Mexico–United States relations were further inflamed by the possibility of the annexation of Texas, as Mexico still viewed Texas as an integral part of Mexico.[109] Additionally, Texas laid claim to all land North of the Rio Grande River, while Mexico argued that the more northern Nueces River was the proper Texan border.[110] Though the United States had a population more than twice as numerous and an economy thirteen times greater than that of Mexico, Mexico was not prepared to give up its claim to Texas, even if it meant war.[111] Following the Texan ratification of annexation in 1845, both Mexicans and Americans saw war as a likely possibility.[109] Polk began preparations for a potential war with Mexico over Texas, and Polk sent an army led by General Zachary Taylor into Texas.[112] Taylor and Commodore David Conner of the US Navy were both ordered to avoid provoking a war, while at the same time to prepare for war and respond to any Mexican breach of peace.[112]

Polk's presidential proclamation of war against Mexico

Though Polk genuinely desired to avoid a war with Mexico, he more strongly desired the acquisition of Texas and Alta California.[113] As in Texas, Mexico had failed to establish strong control over the sprawling expanse of California, and, as in Texas, many Americans had migrated to the region.[114] Polk was particularly worried that the British or another European power would eventually establish control over California if it remained in Mexican hands.[115] Polk hoped that a show of force by the U.S. military under Taylor and Conner could avert war and lead to negotiations with the Mexican government.[112] In late 1845, Polk sent diplomat John Slidell to Mexico to purchase California for $20–40 million.[116] Slidell arrived in Mexico City in December 1845.[117] Though Mexican President José Joaquín de Herrera was open to negotiations, Slidell's ambassadorial credentials were refused by a Mexican council of government.[117] In December 1845, Herrera's government collapsed in large part due to his willingness to negotiate with the United States, as the possibility of the sale of large portions of Mexico aroused anger among both the Mexican elites and broader populace.[118] Herrera was succeeded by General Mariano Paredes, and Mexico began to write a new constitution.[118] As successful negotiations with the unstable Mexican government appeared unlikely, War Secretary Marcy ordered General Taylor to advance to the Rio Grande River.[118] Polk began preparations to support a potential new government led by the exiled Mexican General Antonio López de Santa Anna with the hope that Santa Anna would sell parts of California.[119] Polk had been advised by Alejandro Atocha, an associate Santa Anna, that only the threat of war would allow the Mexican government the leeway to sell parts of Mexico.[119]

In March 1846, Slidell finally left Mexico after the government refused his demand to be formally received.[120] Slidell returned to Washington in May 1846, and gave his opinion that negotiations with the Mexican government were unlikely to be successful.[121] Polk regarded the treatment of his diplomat as an insult and an "ample cause of war", and he prepared to ask Congress for a declaration of war.[122] Meanwhile, in late March, General Taylor had reached the Rio Grande, and his army camped across the river from Matamoros, Tamaulipas.[119] In April, after Mexican general Pedro de Ampudia demanded that Taylor return to the Nueces River, Taylor began a blockade of Matamoros.[121] A skirmish on the northern side of the Rio Grande ended in the death or capture of dozens of American soldiers, and became known as the Thornton Affair.[121] While the administration was in the process of asking for a declaration of war, Polk received word of the outbreak of hostilities on the Rio Grande.[121] In a message to Congress, Polk explained his decision to send Taylor to the Rio Grande, and stated that Mexico had invaded American territory by crossing the river.[123] Polk contended that a state of war already existed, and he asked Congress to grant him the power to bring the war to a close.[123] Polk's message was crafted to present the war as a just and necessary defense of the country against a neighbor that had long troubled the Untied States.[124] In his message, Polk noted that Slidell had gone to Mexico to negotiate a recognition of the Texas annexation, but did not mention that he also sought the purchase of California.[124]

Some Whigs, such as Abraham Lincoln, challenged Polk's version of events,[125] but the House overwhelmingly approved of a resolution authorizing the president to call up fifty thousand volunteers.[126] In the Senate, war opponents led by Calhoun also questioned Polk's version of events.[127] Nonetheless, the House resolution passed the Senate in a 40-2 vote, marking the beginning of the Mexican-American War.[127] Many would-be opponents of the war feared that opposition would cost them politically by casting themselves as unpatriotic for not supporting the war effort.[123][128]

Course of the war[edit]
Overview map of the war. Key:

In May 1846, Taylor led the US in the inconclusive Battle of Palo Alto, the first major battle of the war.[129] The next day, Taylor led the army to victory in the Battle of Resaca de la Palma, eliminating the possibility of a Mexican incursion into the United States.[129] Meanwhile, Winfield Scott, the army's lone major general at the outbreak of the war, was offered the position of top commander in the war.[130] Polk, War Secretary Marcy, and Scott agreed on a strategy in which the US would capture northern Mexico and then pursue a favorable peace settlement.[130] However, Polk and Scott experienced mutual distrust from the beginning of their relationship, in part due to Scott's Whig affiliation and former rivalry with Andrew Jackson.[131] Additionally, Polk sought to ensure that both Whigs and Democrats would serve in important positions in the war, and was offended when Scott suggested otherwise; Scott also angered Polk by opposing Polk's effort to increase the number of generals.[132] Having been alienated from Scott, Polk ordered Scott to remain in Washington, leaving Taylor in command of Mexican operations.[129] Polk also ordered Commodore Conner to allow Santa Anna to return to Mexico from his exile, and sent an army expedition led by Stephen W. Kearny towards Santa Fe.[133]

In 1845, Polk, fearful of French or British intervention, had sent Lieutenant Archibald H. Gillespie to California with orders to foment a pro-American rebellion that could be used to justify annexation of the territory.[134] After meeting with Gillespie, Army captain John C. Frémont led settlers in northern California to overthrow the Mexican garrison in Sonoma in what became known as the Bear Flag Revolt.[135] In August 1846, American forces under Kearny captured Santa Fe, capital of the province of New Mexico.[136] Kearny captured Santa Fe without firing a shot, after the Mexican Govenor, Manuel Armijo, fled from the province.[137] At roughly the same time that Kearny captured Santa Fe, Commodore Robert F. Stockton landed in Los Angeles and proclaimed the capture of California.[136] After American forces put down a revolt, United States held effective control of two northern Mexican provinces.[138] However, the Western theater of the war would prove to be a political headache for Polk, as a dispute between Frémont and Kearny led to a break between Polk and the powerful Missouri Senator (and father-in-law of Frémont), Thomas Hart Benton.[139]

At its outbreak, the war enjoyed support across the nation.[140] However, Whig Congressman Columbus Delano accused Polk of engineering the war, and Whig resistance to the war spread.[140] In August 1846, Polk asked Congress to appropriate $2 million as a down payment for the potential purchase of California.[141] Polk's request ignited opposition to the war, as Polk had never before made public his desire to annex parts of Mexico (aside from lands claimed by Texas).[141] A freshman Democratic Congressman, David Wilmot of Pennsylvania, offered an amendment to the bill that would ban slavery in any newly-acquired lands.[142] The "Wilmot Proviso," as it became known, injected the slavery debate into the Mexican-American War.[142] The appropriation bill, with the Wilmot Proviso attached, passed the House in an 87-64 vote, but the bill died in the Senate.[143] Polk's Democrats would pay a price for the resistance to the war and the growing issue of slavery, as Democrats lost control of the House in the 1846 elections. However, in early 1847, Polk was successful in passing a bill raising further regiments, and he also finally won approval for the money he wanted to use for the purchase of California.[144]

In July 1846, American envoy Alexander Slidell Mackenzie met with Santa Anna, offering terms in which the US would pay to acquire the San Francisco Bay and other parts of Alta California.[145] Santa Anna returned to Mexico City in September 1846, declaring that he would fight against the Americans.[146] With the duplicity of Santa Anna now clear, and with the Mexicans declining his peace offer, Polk ordered an American landing in Veracruz, the most important Mexican port on the Gulf of Mexico.[146]

In the September 1846 Battle of Monterrey, Taylor defeated a Mexican force led by Ampudia, but allowed Ampudia's forces to withdraw, much to Polk's consternation.[147] Taylor was ordered to remain near Monterrey, while Polk reluctantly chose Winfield Scott to lead the attack on Veracruz.[148] As a march from Monterrey to Mexico City was implausible due to rough terrain,[149] Polk considered the possibility of a march from Veracruz to Mexico City after the capture of the former city.[150] In March 1847, Polk learned that Taylor had ignored orders and had continued to march South, capturing the northern Mexican town of Saltillo.[151] Taylor's army repulsed a larger Mexican force, led by Santa Anna, in the Battle of Buena Vista.[151] Taylor won acclaim for the result of the battle, but the theater remained inconclusive and Polk saw it as doing little to bring the war to an end.[151] While Taylor fought Santa Anna, Scott landed in Veracruz, and quickly won control of the city.[152] With the capture of Veracruz, Polk dispatched Nicholas Trist, Buchanan's chief clerk, to negotiate a peace treaty with Mexican leaders.[152] Trist was ordered to seek the cession of Alta California, New Mexico, and Baja California, recognition of the Rio Grande as the southern border of Texas, and American access across the Isthmus of Tehuantepec.[153] Trist was authorized to make a payment of up to $30 million in exchange for these concessions.[153]

In April 1847, Scott defeated a Mexican force led by Santa Anna at the Battle of Cerro Gordo.[154] The decisive victory cleared the way for a march to Mexico City.[154] In August, Scott defeated Santa Anna again at the Battle of Contreras and the Battle of Churubusco.[155] With these victories over a larger force, Scott's army was positioned to besiege Mexico's capital.[155] Santa Anna negotiated a truce with Scott, and the Mexican foreign minister notified Trist that they were ready to begin negotiations.[156] However, the Mexican and American delegations remained far apart on terms; Mexico was only willing to yield portions of Upper California, and refused to agree to the Rio Grande border.[157] While negotiations continued, Scott captured the Mexican capital in the Battle for Mexico City.[158] In the United States, a heated political debate emerged regarding how much of Mexico the United States should seek to annex, with Whigs such as Henry Clay arguing that the United States should only seek to settle the Texas border question, and some expansionists arguing for the annexation of all of Mexico.[159] Frustrated by the lack of progress in negotiations, and troubled by rumors that Trist was willing to negotiate on the Rio Grande border, Polk ordered Trist to return to Washington.[160] Polk decided to occupy large portions of Mexico and wait for a Mexican peace offer.[161] In late 1847, Polk learned of Scott and Trist's attempt to bribe Mexican officials in an attempt to open negotiations, as well as Scott's court-martial of a close Polk friend, Gideon Johnson Pillow.[162] Outraged especially by the latter event, Polk demanded Scott's return to Washington, with William Orlando Butler tapped as his replacement.[162]

Peace: the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo[edit]
The Mexican Cession (in red) was acquired through the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. The Gadsden Purchase (in orange) was acquired through purchase after Polk left office.

In September 1847, Manuel de la Peña y Peña replaced Santa Anna as President of Mexico, and Pena and his Moderado allies showed a willingness to negotiate based on the terms Polk had relayed to Trist.[163] In November 1847, Trist received Polk's order to return to Washington.[163] After a period of indecision, and with the backing of Scott and the Mexican government (which was aware of Trist's recall), Trist decided to enter into negotiations with the Mexican government.[163] As Polk had made no plans to send an envoy to replace him, Trist thought that he could not pass up the opportunity to end the war on favorable terms.[163] Though Polk was outraged by Trist's decision, he decided to allow Trist some time to negotiate a treaty.[164]

Throughout January 1848, Trist regularly met with Mexican officials in Guadalupe Hidalgo, a small town North of Mexico City.[165] Trist was willing to allow Mexico to keep Lower California, but successfully haggled for the inclusion of the important harbor of San Diego in a cession of Upper California.[165] The Mexican delegation agreed to recognize the Rio Grande border, while Trist agreed to have the United States cover prior American claims against the Mexican government.[165] The two sides also agreed to the right of Mexicans in annexed territory to leave or become U.S. citizens, American responsibility to prevent cross-border Indian raids, protection of church property, and a $15 million payment to Mexico.[165] On February 2, 1848, Trist and the Mexican delegation signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo.[165] Polk received the document on February 19.[166] While he remained angry at Trist for disobeying orders, Polk and a majority of his Cabinet accepted the terms of the treaty.[166] In dissent were Buchanan, who called for more territory, and Secretary of the Treasury Walker, who wanted to annex all of Mexico.[166] Though Polk also expressed a desire for more territory, he was eager to bring the war to a close and reasonably satisfied with the amount of ceded territory, so he submitted the treaty to the Senate.[167] Ratification of the treaty required a 2/3 super-majority of the Senate, and ratification was uncertain due to the opposition of various Senators, including those who opposed the annexation of any Mexican territory.[168] On March 10, the Senate ratified the treaty in a 38-14 vote, with aye and nay votes spread equally across partisan and geographic lines.[169] The Senate made some modifications to the treaty before ratification, and Polk worried that the Mexican government would reject the modifications.[170] However, on June 7, Polk learned that Mexico had ratified the treaty, thus ending the war.[171] With the acquisition of California, Polk had accomplished all four of his major presidential goals.[171]

The Mexican Cession added 600,000 square miles of territory to the United States, including a long Pacific coastline.[171] The modern states of California, Nevada, Utah, most of Arizona, and parts of New Mexico, Colorado, and Wyoming were all included in the Mexican Cession. The treaty also recognized the annexation of Texas and acknowledged American control over the disputed territory between the Nueces River and the Rio Grande. Mexico, in turn, received $15 million.[165] The war had cost the lives of nearly 14,000 Americans and 25,000 Mexicans, as well as the expense of roughly one hundred million dollars.[171][172] The 1853 Gadsden Purchase would later acquire another 30,000 square miles from Mexico (the area eventually became part of Arizona and New Mexico), establishing the modern borders of the Contiguous United States.

United States states and territories when Polk entered office
United States states and territories when Polk left office

Polk issued an official proclamation of the end of the war on July 4, 1848.[173] Polk's next task was the establishment of territorial governments in the new territories, which was complicated by the ongoing slavery debate.[173] The Missouri Compromise had settled the issue of the geographic reach of slavery within the Louisiana Purchase territories by prohibiting slavery North of the 36°30′ latitude, and Polk sought to extend this line into the newly-acquired territory.[173] Polk supported a territorial organization bill crafted by Senator John M. Clayton that would have prohibited slavery in Oregon while staying silent on the issue in California and New Mexico.[174] Though the bill passed the Senate, it was defeated in the House in an effort led by Alexander H. Stephens of Georgia.[175] A separate measure to extend the Missouri Compromise line to the Pacific coast was also defeated in the House, this time by a bipartisan alliance of northerners.[176] As the last congressional session before the 1848 election came to a close, Polk signed the lone territorial bill passed by Congress, which established the Territory of Oregon and prohibited slavery in it.[177] Polk feared that the failure to provide for an organized government in New Mexico and especially California could lead to independence for those remote regions.[178] When Congress re-convened in December, he focused his efforts on granting immediate statehood to California, thereby avoiding the issue of the Wilmot Proviso.[178] However, the divisive issue of slavery blocked any such legislation, and Polk left office fearing that the United States might lose the western territories acquired during his presidency.[179] The Compromise of 1850 would later settle a number of outstanding issues from Polk's presidency, including the admission of California as a state and the creation of New Mexico Territory and Utah Territory.

Other initiatives[edit]

Polk's ambassador to the Republic of New Granada, Benjamin Alden Bidlack, negotiated the Mallarino–Bidlack Treaty with the government of New Granada.[180] Though Bidlack had initially only sought to remove tariffs on American goods, Bidlack and New Granadan Foreign Minister Manuel María Mallarino negotiated a broader agreement that deepened military and trade ties between the two countries.[180] The treaty also allowed for the construction of the Panama Railway.[181] In an era of slow overland travel, the treaty gave the United States a route to more rapidly travel between its eastern and western coasts.[181] In exchange, Bidlack agreed to have the United States guarantee New Granada's sovereignty over the Isthmus of Panama.[180] The treaty won ratification in both countries in 1848.[181] The agreement helped to establish a stronger American influence in the region, as the Polk administration sought to ensure that Great Britain would not dominate Central America.[181] The United States would use the Mallarino-Bidlack Treaty as justification for numerous military interventions in the 19th century.[180]

In mid-1848, President Polk authorized his ambassador to Spain, Romulus Mitchell Saunders, to negotiate the purchase of Cuba and offer Spain up to $100 million, an astounding sum at the time for one territory, equal to $2.74 billion in present-day terms.[182] Cuba was close to the United States and had slavery, so the idea appealed to Southerners but was unwelcome in the North. However, Spain was still making huge profits in Cuba (notably in sugar, molasses, rum, and tobacco), and thus the Spanish government rejected Saunders' overtures.[183] Polk refused to support the proposed filibuster expedition of Narciso López, who sought to invade and annex Cuba.[184]

Domestic policy[edit]

Fiscal policy[edit]

Polk's inaugural address to Congress called for the re-establishment of the Independent Treasury System, under which government funds were held in the Treasury and not in banks or other financial institutions.[185] This established independent treasury deposit offices, separate from private or state banks, to receive all government funds.[186] Polk was able to pass the bill after personally winning the support of Senator Dixon Lewis, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.[186] Polk's system would remain in place until the passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913.[187]

Polk's other major domestic initiative was the lowering of the tariff, as Polk argued that the tariff should only be as high as necessary for the operation of the federal government.[185] Polk rejected the notion that tariffs should be used to protect certain industries.[188] In 1846, Congress approved the Walker Tariff (named after Robert J. Walker, the Secretary of the Treasury), which represented a substantial reduction of the high Whig-backed Tariff of 1842.[189] The new law abandoned ad valorem tariffs and set rates independent of the monetary value of the product.[188] Polk's actions were popular in the South and West; however, they were despised by many protectionists in the Northeast, especially Pennsylvania.[188] A reduction of tariffs in the United States and a repeal of the Corn Laws in Great Britain led to a boom in Anglo-American trade.[187]

Rivers and Harbors Veto[edit]

Congress passed the Rivers and Harbors Bill in 1846 to provide $500,000 to improve rivers and harbors, but Polk vetoed the bill. It would have provided for federally funded internal improvements on small harbors. Polk believed that this was unconstitutional because the bill unfairly favored particular areas, including ports which had no foreign trade. Polk believed that these problems were local and not national. Polk feared that passing the Rivers and Harbors Bill would encourage legislators to compete for favors for their home districts – a type of corruption that would spell doom to the virtue of the republic.[190] In this regard he followed his hero Andrew Jackson, who had vetoed the Maysville Road Bill in 1830 on similar grounds.[191]

Slavery[edit]

President Polk photograph by Mathew Brady, February 17, 1849, less than a month before leaving office, and only four months before his death.

Like Jackson, Polk saw slavery as a side issue compared to more important matters such as territorial expansion and economic policy.[192] However, the issue of slavery became increasingly polarizing during the 1840s, and Polk's expansionary policies increased its divisiveness.[192] During his presidency, many abolitionists harshly criticized him as an instrument of the "Slave Power", and claimed that spreading slavery was the reason he supported annexing Texas and later war with Mexico.[193] The Wilmot Proviso, introduced by Democratic Representative David Wilmot of Pennsylvania on August 8, 1846 (just two months after the outbreak of the Mexican–American War), aimed to ban slavery anywhere in any territory that might be acquired from Mexico. Polk and many other Southerners were against the measure (which passed in the House, but not in the Senate). Polk argued instead for extending the Missouri Compromise line west to the Pacific Ocean. That would have allowed slavery below the 36° 30' latitude line west of Missouri, and prohibit it above.[194] Though Polk opposed the Wilmot Proviso, he also condemned southern agitation on the issue, and he accused both northern and southern leaders of attempting to use the slavery issue for political gain.[195]

Polk was a slaveholder for his entire life. His father, Samuel Polk, had left Polk more than 8,000 acres (32 km²) of land, and divided about 53 slaves to his widow and children after he died. James inherited twenty of his father's slaves, either directly or from deceased brothers. In 1831, he became an absentee cotton planter, sending slaves to clear plantation land that his father had left him near Somerville, Tennessee. Four years later Polk sold his Somerville plantation and, together with his brother-in-law, bought 920 acres (3.7 km²) of land, a cotton plantation near Coffeeville, Mississippi. He ran this plantation for the rest of his life, eventually taking it over completely from his brother-in-law. Polk rarely sold slaves, although once he became President and could better afford it, he bought more. Polk's will stipulated that their slaves were to be freed after his wife Sarah had died. However, the 1863 Emancipation Proclamation and the 1865 Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution freed all remaining slaves in rebel states long before the death of his wife in 1891.[196]

Department of the Interior[edit]

One of Polk's last acts as President was to sign the bill creating the Department of the Interior (March 3, 1849). This was the first new cabinet position created since the early days of the Republic. Polk had misgivings about the federal government usurping power over public lands from the states; however, the delivery of the legislation on his last full day in office gave him no time to find constitutional grounds for a veto, or to draft a sufficient veto message, so Polk signed the bill.[197]

Election of 1848[edit]

Results of the 1848 Presidential election

Honoring his pledge to serve only one term, Polk declined to seek re-election in 1848. However, Polk's actions strongly affected the 1848 race. With Polk out of the race, the Democratic Party remained fractured along geographic lines, with Senators Cass and Calhoun the leading western and southern candidates, respectively.[198] Former President Van Buren also retained strong support among northeasterners.[198] Polk privately favored Cass as his successor, but resisted becoming closely involved in the election.[168] At the 1848 Democratic National Convention, which lasted from May 22 to May 25, a message from Polk reiterated his absolute refusal to serve a second term.[199] At the convention, Buchanan, Michigan Senator Lewis Cass, and Supreme Court Justice Levi Woodbury emerged as the main contenders.[199] Cass led after the first ballot, and slowly gained support until he clinched the nomination on the fourth ballot.[199] William Butler, who had replaced Winfield Scott as the commanding general in Mexico City, won the vice presidential nomination.[199] Cass's nomination from many northerners and southerners, each of whom saw Cass as insufficiently committed to their position on the slavery issue.[199]

During the course of the Mexican War, Generals Taylor and Scott emerged as strong Whig candidates, alongside anti-war Senator Thomas Corwin and longtime party leader Henry Clay.[200] As the war continued, Taylor's stature with the public grew, and he announced in 1847 that he would not refuse the presidency.[200] The 1848 Whig National Convention took place on June 8, with Taylor, Clay, Scott, and Massachusetts Senator Daniel Webster emerging as the major candidates.[201] Taylor narrowly led Clay after the first ballot, but Taylor steadily grew his support until he captured the nomination on the fourth ballot.[201] Clay bemoaned the selection of Taylor, as the ideologically ambiguous Taylor had not articulated his preferred policies.[201] The Whigs chose former Congressman Millard Fillmore of New York as Taylor's running mate.[201]

In New York, an anti-slavery Democratic faction known as the Barnburners strongly supported the Wilmot Proviso and rejected Cass.[202] Joined by other anti-slavery Democrat from other states, the Barnburners held a convention nominating former President Martin Van Buren as their own presidential nominee.[202] Though Van Buren had not been known for his anti-slavery views while president, he embraced them in 1848.[202] Polk was surprised and disappointed by his former ally's political conversion, and worried about the divisiveness of a sectional party organized around abolitionism.[202] Van Buren was joined on the Free Soil Party's ticket by Charles Francis Adams Sr., son of former President and prominent Whig John Quincy Adams.

In the election, Taylor won 47.3% of the popular vote and a majority of the electoral vote, giving the Whigs control of the presidency. Cass won 42.5% of the vote, while Van Buren finished with 10.1% of the popular vote, more than any other third party presidential candidate at that time. Despite the increasingly polarizing slavery debate, Taylor and Cass both won a mix of northern and southern states. However, much of Van Buren's support came from northern Democrats.[203] Polk was very disappointed by the outcome had a low opinion of Taylor, seeing the general as someone with poor judgment and few opinions.[203] Polk left Washington on March 6, 1849, never to return.[204]

Congress[edit]

29th Congress (March 4, 1845 – March 4, 1847)

  • Senate: 31 Democrats, 31 Whigs, 1 Other (President Pro Tempore – Willie P. Mangum (Whig-NC), Ambrose H. Servier (D-AR), and David R. Atchison (D-MO))
  • House: 143 Democrats, 77 Whigs, 6 Others (Speaker – John W. Davis of Indiana)

30th Congress (March 4, 1847 – March 4, 1849)

  • Senate: 36 Democrats, 21 Whigs, 1 Other (President Pro Tempore – David R. Atchison (D-MO))
  • House: 115 Whigs, 108 Democrats, 4 Others (Speaker – Robert C. Winthrop of Massachusetts)

Post-presidency[edit]

An undated daguerreotype of James K. Polk, from late in his presidential term or perhaps in the months after he left office.
James K. Polk's tomb lies on the grounds of the state capitol in Nashville, Tennessee.

Polk's time in the White House took its toll on his health. Full of enthusiasm and vigor when he entered office, Polk left on March 4, 1849, exhausted by his years of public service. He lost weight and had deep lines on his face and dark circles under his eyes. He is believed to have contracted cholera in New Orleans, Louisiana, on a goodwill tour of the South after leaving the White House.[205] He died of cholera at his new home,[206] Polk Place, in Nashville, Tennessee, at 3:15 pm on June 15, 1849, three months after leaving office. He had never joined any church, but received a deathbed Methodist baptism.[207] He was buried on the grounds of Polk Place. Polk's last words illustrate his devotion to his wife: "I love you, Sarah. For all eternity, I love you."[208] She lived at Polk Place for over forty years after his death. She died on August 14, 1891. Polk was also survived by his mother, Jane Knox Polk, who died on January 11, 1852.[209][210] In 1893, the bodies of President and Mrs. Polk were exhumed and relocated to their current resting place on the grounds of the Tennessee State Capitol in Nashville. Polk Place was demolished in 1900.

Polk had the shortest retirement of all Presidents at 103 days.[211] He was the youngest former president to die in retirement at the age of 53. Along with George Washington, Andrew Johnson, Chester A. Arthur, Calvin Coolidge and Lyndon B. Johnson, he is one of six presidents to have died while his direct successor was in office.

Reputation[edit]

A statue of James Knox Polk at the North Carolina State Capitol

Polk's historic reputation was largely formed by the attacks made on him in his own time. Whig politicians claimed that he was drawn from a well-deserved obscurity. Sam Houston is said to have observed that Polk was "a victim of the use of water as a beverage".[212] Senator Tom Corwin of Ohio remarked "James K. Polk, of Tennessee? After that, who is safe?" The Republican historians of the nineteenth century inherited this view. Polk was a compromise between the Democrats of the North, like David Wilmot and Silas Wright, and Southern plantation owners led by John C. Calhoun. The northern Democrats thought that when they did not get their way, it was because he was the tool of the slaveholders, and the conservatives of the South insisted that he was the tool of the northern Democrats. These views were long reflected in the historical literature, until Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr and Bernard De Voto argued that Polk was nobody's tool, but set his own goals and achieved them.[213]

Polk is now recognized, not only as the strongest president between Jackson and Lincoln, but the president who made the United States a coast-to-coast nation. When historians began ranking the presidents in 1948, Polk ranked 10th in Arthur M. Schlesinger's poll. and has subsequently ranked 8th in Schlesinger's 1962 poll, 11th in the Riders-McIver Poll (1996), 11th in the most recent Siena Poll (2002), 9th in the most recent Wall Street Journal Poll (2005), and 12th in the latest C-Span Poll (2009).[214]

Polk biographers over the years have sized up the magnitude of Polk's achievements and his legacy, particularly his two most recent. "There are three key reasons why James K. Polk deserves recognition as a significant and influential American president," Walter Borneman wrote. "First, Polk accomplished the objectives of his presidential term as he defined them; second, he was the most decisive chief executive before the Civil War; and third, he greatly expanded the executive power of the presidency, particularly its war powers, its role as commander-in-chief, and its oversight of the executive branch."[215] President Harry S. Truman summarized this view by saying that Polk was "a great president. Said what he intended to do and did it."[216]

While Polk's legacy thus takes many forms, the most outstanding is the map of the continental United States, whose landmass he increased by a third. "To look at that map," Robert Merry concluded, "and to take in the western and southwestern expanse included in it, is to see the magnitude of Polk's presidential accomplishments."[217] Though there were powerful forces compelling Americans to the Pacific, some historians, such as Gary Kornblith, have posited that a Clay presidency would have seen the permanent independence of Texas and California.[218]

Nevertheless, Polk's aggressive expansionism has been criticized on ethical grounds. He believed in "Manifest Destiny" even more than most did. Referencing the Mexican–American War, General Ulysses S. Grant stated that "I was bitterly opposed to the [Texas annexation], and to this day regard the war, which resulted, as one of the most unjust ever waged by a stronger against a weaker nation. It was an instance of a republic following the bad example of European monarchies, in not considering justice in their desire to acquire additional territory."[219] Whig politicians, including Abraham Lincoln and John Quincy Adams, contended that the Texas Annexation and the Mexican Cession enhanced the pro-slavery factions of the United States.[220] Unsatisfactory conditions pertaining to the status of slavery in the territories acquired during the Polk administration led to the Compromise of 1850, one of the primary factors in the establishment of the Republican Party and later the beginning of the American Civil War.[221] Though historians such as Charles W. Ramsdell and Charles A. Beard viewed the Civil War as inevitable, Kornblith speculates that the Civil War would not have happened if not for the Wilmot Proviso debate's exacerbation of section tensions.[218]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ a b James Knox Polk from PresidentialAvenue.com
  2. ^ The Overlooked President from TheDailyBeast.com
  3. ^ "James K. Polk Birthplace". Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission. Retrieved September 15, 2016. 
  4. ^ a b c Borneman, p. 6
  5. ^ Haynes, pp. 4–6.
  6. ^ a b c Borneman p. 7
  7. ^ a b Borneman p. 8
  8. ^ Seigenthaler p. 19
  9. ^ Borneman p. 13
  10. ^ Haynes p.11.
  11. ^ Borneman p. 8–9
  12. ^ "History". University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Retrieved 2011-04-15. 
  13. ^ Borneman p. 10
  14. ^ a b Borneman p. 11
  15. ^ Seigenthaler p.24
  16. ^ a b Seigenthaler p.25
  17. ^ United States Army, Soldiers, 1980, page 4
  18. ^ a b Borneman p. 14
  19. ^ Merry p. 17
  20. ^ Borneman p. 17
  21. ^ Borneman p. 18
  22. ^ Merry p. 26-30
  23. ^ Sarah Childress Polk. The White House. Retrieved on October 14, 2007.
  24. ^ a b c d Borneman p. 22
  25. ^ Merry p. 25-27
  26. ^ a b c Borneman p. 23
  27. ^ Borneman p. 24
  28. ^ Borneman p. 26
  29. ^ Merry p. 30, 39-40
  30. ^ Borneman p. 33
  31. ^ Merry p. 42-43
  32. ^ Borneman p. 34
  33. ^ Merry p. 43
  34. ^ Merry p. 43
  35. ^ Borneman p. 35
  36. ^ Merry p. 43-44
  37. ^ Seigenthaler p. 57
  38. ^ Seigenthaler p. 60
  39. ^ a b Seigenthaler p. 62
  40. ^ Merry p. 45-46
  41. ^ Seigenthaler p. 64
  42. ^ Seigenthaler p.65: 54,012 to 51,396
  43. ^ Seigenthaler p. 66
  44. ^ Merry p. 47
  45. ^ "Electoral College Box Scores 1789–1996". National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved July 31, 2005. 
  46. ^ a b Merry p. 47-49
  47. ^ Borneman p.64
  48. ^ Seigenthaler p. 68
  49. ^ Merry p. 43-44
  50. ^ a b c Merry p. 50-53
  51. ^ a b Merry p. 53-55
  52. ^ Merry p. 57-60
  53. ^ Merry p. 75
  54. ^ Merry p. 68-69
  55. ^ Merry p. 80
  56. ^ Merry p. 83-84
  57. ^ Merry, pg. 84-85
  58. ^ a b Merry, pg. 87-88
  59. ^ Merry, pg. 89
  60. ^ Merry, pg. 90-92
  61. ^ a b Merry, pg. 92-94
  62. ^ Merry, pg. 94-95
  63. ^ Haynes, pp. 61–2
  64. ^ a b Merry, pg. 96-97
  65. ^ Borneman, pg. 355-356
  66. ^ Merry, pg. 103
  67. ^ a b Merry, pg. 103-104
  68. ^ a b Merry, pg. 99-100
  69. ^ a b Merry, pg. 107-108
  70. ^ a b c Merry, pg. 109-111
  71. ^ "The American Presidency Project – Election of 1844." Retrieved: March 27, 2008.
  72. ^ "Presidential Elections Maps 1844–1856". National Atlas. Retrieved March 27, 2008.
  73. ^ Merry, pg. 112-113
  74. ^ Merry, pg. 114-117
  75. ^ a b c d e f g Merry, pg. 117-119
  76. ^ a b c Merry, pg. 124-126
  77. ^ Merry, pg. 127
  78. ^ a b c Merry, pg. 120-124
  79. ^ Merry, pg. 127-128
  80. ^ "President James Knox Polk, 1845". Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies. Retrieved 2009-01-23. 
  81. ^ a b Merry, pg. 132-133
  82. ^ a b c Merry, pg. 131-132
  83. ^ a b c d Merry, pg. 134-135
  84. ^ Merry, pg. 134, 220-221
  85. ^ Merry, pg. 439-440
  86. ^ Merry, pg. 282
  87. ^ Merry, pg. 269-270
  88. ^ Recess appointment; formally nominated on December 23, 1845, confirmed by the United States Senate on January 3, 1846, and received commission on January 3, 1846.
  89. ^ Merry, pg. 220-221
  90. ^ a b c Merry, pg. 168-169
  91. ^ a b Merry, pg. 170-171
  92. ^ Merry, pg. 173-175
  93. ^ Merry, pg. 190
  94. ^ This slogan, although often associated with Polk, was the position of his rivals in the Democratic Party, who wanted Polk to be as uncompromising in acquiring the Oregon territory as he had been in annexing Texas. This slogan is inappropriately tagged to the Election of 1844, although it didn't come until the year after. Borneman, p. 164, 173.
  95. ^ Merry, pg. 190-191
  96. ^ Merry, pg. 206
  97. ^ a b Merry, pg. 196-197
  98. ^ a b c Merry, pg. 211-212
  99. ^ Merry, pg. 213-217
  100. ^ Merry, pg. 224-225
  101. ^ Merry, pg. 225-227
  102. ^ a b Merry, pg. 263-264
  103. ^ a b c d Merry, pg. 266-267
  104. ^ a b Merry, pg. 136-137
  105. ^ Merry, pg. 148-151
  106. ^ Merry, pg. 151-157
  107. ^ Merry, pg. 158
  108. ^ a b c d Merry, pg. 184-186
  109. ^ a b Merry, pg. 176-177
  110. ^ Merry, pg. 187
  111. ^ Merry, pg. 180
  112. ^ a b c Merry, pg. 188-189
  113. ^ Merry, pg. 195-196
  114. ^ Merry, pg. 199-200
  115. ^ Lee, Jr., Ronald C. (Summer 2002). "Justifying Empire: Pericles, Polk, and a Dilemma of Democratic Leadership". Polity. 34 (4): 526. 
  116. ^ Merry, pg. 193-194
  117. ^ a b Merry, pg. 209-210
  118. ^ a b c Merry, pg. 218-219
  119. ^ a b c Merry, pg. 238-240
  120. ^ Merry, pg. 232-233
  121. ^ a b c d Merry, pg. 240-242
  122. ^ Haynes, p. 129
  123. ^ a b c Merry, pg. 244-245
  124. ^ a b Lee, pgs. 517-518
  125. ^ Mark E. Neely, Jr., "War And Partisanship: What Lincoln Learned from James K. Polk," Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society, Sept 1981, Vol. 74 Issue 3, pp 199–216
  126. ^ Merry, pg. 245-246
  127. ^ a b Merry, pg. 246-247
  128. ^ In January 1848, the Whigs won a House vote attacking Polk in an amendment to a resolution praising Major General Taylor for his service in a "war unnecessarily and unconstitutionally begun by the President of the United States". House Journal, 30th Session (1848) pp.183–184 The resolution, however, died in committee.
  129. ^ a b c Merry, pg. 259-260
  130. ^ a b Merry, pg. 256-257
  131. ^ Merry, pg. 253-254
  132. ^ Merry, pg. 258-259
  133. ^ Merry, pg. 262
  134. ^ Merry, pg. 295-296
  135. ^ Merry, pg. 302-304
  136. ^ a b Merry, pg. 293-294
  137. ^ Merry, pg. 298-299
  138. ^ Merry, pg. 304-306
  139. ^ Merry, pg. 423-424
  140. ^ a b Merry, pg. 255-256
  141. ^ a b Merry, pg. 283-285
  142. ^ a b Merry, pg. 286-289
  143. ^ Merry, pg. 290-291
  144. ^ Merry, pg. 343-349
  145. ^ Merry, pg. 278-279
  146. ^ a b Merry, pg. 309-310
  147. ^ Merry, pg. 311-313
  148. ^ Merry, pg. 318-20
  149. ^ Merry, pg. 314
  150. ^ Merry, pg. 336
  151. ^ a b c Merry, pg. 352-355
  152. ^ a b Merry, pg. 358-359
  153. ^ a b Merry, pg. 360-361
  154. ^ a b Merry, pg. 363-364
  155. ^ a b Merry, pg. 381-382
  156. ^ Merry, pg. 383-384
  157. ^ Merry, pg. 384-385
  158. ^ Merry, pg. 387-388
  159. ^ Merry, pg. 394-397
  160. ^ Merry, pg. 386
  161. ^ Merry, pg. 403-404
  162. ^ a b Merry, pg. 407-409
  163. ^ a b c d Merry, pg. 397-400
  164. ^ Merry, pg. 420-421
  165. ^ a b c d e f Merry, pg. 424-425
  166. ^ a b c Merry, pg. 426-427
  167. ^ Merry, pg. 428-429
  168. ^ a b Merry, pg. 430-431
  169. ^ Merry, pg. 434-435
  170. ^ Merry, pg. 436-437
  171. ^ a b c d Merry, pg. 448-450
  172. ^ Rough estimate of total cost, Smith, II 266–67; this includes the payments to Mexico in exchange for the ceded territories. The excess military appropriations during the war itself were $63,605,621.
  173. ^ a b c Merry, pg. 452-453
  174. ^ Merry, pg. 454,
  175. ^ Merry, pg. 456-457
  176. ^ Merry, pg. 458-459
  177. ^ Merry, pg. 460-461
  178. ^ a b Merry, pg. 465-466
  179. ^ Merry, pg. 468-470
  180. ^ a b c d Conniff, Michael L. (2001). Panama and the United States: The Forced Alliance. University of Georgia Press. pp. 19–20. 
  181. ^ a b c d Randall, Stephen J. (1992). Colombia and the United States: Hegemony and Interdependence. University of Georgia Press. p. 27-33. 
  182. ^ Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Community Development Project. "Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–". Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Retrieved November 10, 2015. 
  183. ^ David M. Pletcher, The Diplomacy of Annexation: Texas, Oregon, and the Mexican War (1973) pp. 571–74.
  184. ^ Chaffin, Tom (Spring 1995). "Sons of Washington": Narciso López, Filibustering, and U.S. Nationalism, 1848-1851. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 79. Retrieved 19 September 2016. 
  185. ^ a b Merry, pg. 206-207
  186. ^ a b Merry, pg. 273
  187. ^ a b Merry, pg. 276-277
  188. ^ a b c Merry, pg. 274-276
  189. ^ Miller Center of Public Affairs (2013). "American President: A Reference Resource Key Events in the Presidency of James K. Polk". millercenter.org. 
  190. ^ Yonatan Eyal, The Young America movement and the transformation of the Democratic Party (2007) p. 63
  191. ^ Mark Eaton Byrnes, James K. Polk: a biographical companion (2001) p. 44
  192. ^ a b Merry, pg. 129-130
  193. ^ Haynes, p. 154
  194. ^ "From the Wilmot Proviso to the Compromise of 1850". americaslibrary.gov. Library of Congress. Retrieved February 21, 2016. 
  195. ^ Merry, pg. 356-358
  196. ^ Dusinberre, passim
  197. ^ Borneman, pp. 334-45
  198. ^ a b Merry, pg. 376-377
  199. ^ a b c d e Merry, pg. 446-447
  200. ^ a b Merry, pg. 374-375
  201. ^ a b c d Merry, pg. 447-448
  202. ^ a b c d Merry, pg. 455-456
  203. ^ a b Merry, pg. 462-463
  204. ^ Merry, pg. 470
  205. ^ Haynes, p. 191
  206. ^ Dusinberre 2003, p. 3
  207. ^ Mayo, Louise (2006). President James K. Polk : the dark horse president. New York: Nova History Publications. p. 8. ISBN 1594547181. Retrieved 19 September 2016. 
  208. ^ "First Lady Biography: Sarah Polk". The National First Ladies Library. 2005. Retrieved April 13, 2008. 
  209. ^ Dusinberre, p. xii. Mrs Polk died in 1852.
  210. ^ "Parents at the Inaugurations". Presidents' Parents. 
  211. ^ Cruse, Wayne (May 7, 2015). "Presidential Facts – Shortest Retirement". Presidential Crossroads. Retrieved July 9, 2016. 
  212. ^ Borneman, p. 11.
  213. ^ Schlesinger, pp.439–455; quote from Corwin (who became a Republican) on p. 439
  214. ^ Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States
  215. ^ Borneman, p. 353.
  216. ^ Truman, Harry S., and Robert H. Ferrell, Off the Record: The Private Papers of Harry S. Truman, Letter to Dean Acheson (unsent), August 26, 1960 (University of Missouri Press, 1997), p. 390.
  217. ^ Merry, Robert W. (2009). A Country of Vast Designs, James K. Polk, the Mexican War, and the Conquest of the American Continent. Simon & Schuster. p. 477. 
  218. ^ a b "Rethinking the Coming of the Civil War: A Counterfactual Exercise". The Journal of American History. 90 (1): 76–105. June 2003. 
  219. ^ Ulysses S Grant Quotes on the Military Academy and the Mexican War from Fadedgiant.net Archived March 7, 2015, at the Wayback Machine.
  220. ^ Stephenson, Nathaniel Wright. Texas and the Mexican War: A Chronicle of Winning the Southwest. Yale University Press (1921), pg. 94–95.
  221. ^ Holt, Michael F. The Political Crisis of the 1850s (1978).

Further reading[edit]

  • Borneman, Walter R. (2008). Polk: The Man Who Transformed the Presidency and America. Random House. ISBN 978-1-4000-6560-8. 
  • Bergeron, Paul H. The Presidency of James K. Polk. 1986. ISBN 0-7006-0319-0.
  • Chaffin, Tom. Met His Every Goal? James K. Polk and the Legends of Manifest Destiny (University of Tennessee Press; 2014) 124 pages;
  • De Voto, Bernard. The Year of Decision: 1846. Houghton Mifflin, 1943.
  • Dusinberre, William. Slavemaster President: The Double Career of James Polk 2003. ISBN 0-19-515735-4
  • Dusinberre, William. "President Polk and the Politics of Slavery". American Nineteenth Century History 3.1 (2002): 1–16. ISSN 1466-4658. Argues he misrepresented strength of abolitionism, grossly exaggerated likelihood of slaves' massacring white families and seemed to condone secession.
  • Eisenhower, John S. D. "The Election of James K. Polk, 1844". Tennessee Historical Quarterly. 53.2 (1994): 74–87. ISSN 0040-3261.
  • Haynes, Sam W. (1997). James K. Polk and the Expansionist Impulse. New York: Longman. ISBN 978-0-673-99001-3. 
  • Kornblith, Gary J. "Rethinking the Coming of the Civil War: a Counterfactual Exercise". Journal of American History 90.1 (2003): 76–105. ISSN 0021-8723. Asks what if Polk had not gone to war?
  • Leonard, Thomas M. James K. Polk: A Clear and Unquestionable Destiny. 2000. ISBN 0-8420-2647-9.
  • McCormac, Eugene Irving. James K. Polk: A Political Biography to the End of a Career, 1845–1849. Univ. of California Press, 1922. (1995 reprint has ISBN 0-945707-10-X.) hostile to Jacksonians
  • Merry, Robert W. A Country of Vast Designs: James K. Polk, the Mexican War, and the Conquest of the American Continent (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2009. xiv, 576 pp.) ISBN 978-0-7432-9743-1
  • Morrison, Michael A. "Martin Van Buren, the Democracy, and the Partisan Politics of Texas Annexation". Journal of Southern History 61.4 (1995): 695–724. ISSN 0022-4642. Discusses the election of 1844. online edition
  • Paul; James C. N. Rift in the Democracy. (1951). on 1844 election
  • Pletcher, David M. The Diplomacy of Annexation: Texas, Oregon, and the Mexican War (1973), standard the study of Polk's foreign policy
  • Sellers, Charles. James K. Polk, Jacksonian, 1795–1843 (1957) vol 1 online; and James K. Polk, Continentalist, 1843–1846. (1966) vol 2 online; long scholarly biography
  • Seigenthaler, John. James K. Polk: 1845–1849. 2003. ISBN 0-8050-6942-9, short popular biography
  • Silbey, Joel H. (2014). A Companion to the Antebellum Presidents 1837-1861. Wiley.  pp 195–290
  • Smith, Justin Harvey. The War with Mexico, Vol 1. (2 vol 1919), full text online.
    • Smith, Justin Harvey. The War with Mexico, Vol. 2. (2 vol 1919). full text online; Pulitzer prize; still the standard source,

Primary sources[edit]

  • Cutler, Wayne, et al. Correspondence of James K. Polk. 1972–2004. ISBN 1-57233-304-9. Ten vol. scholarly edition of the complete correspondence to and from Polk.
  • Polk, James K. The Diary of James K. Polk During His Presidency, 1845–1849 edited by Milo Milton Quaife, 4 vols. 1910. Abridged version by Allan Nevins. 1929, online

External links[edit]