|36th Sheriff of Maricopa County|
January 1, 1993 – January 1, 2017
|Preceded by||Tom Agnos|
|Succeeded by||Paul Penzone|
|Born||Joseph Michael Arpaio
June 14, 1932
Springfield, Massachusetts, U.S.
|Service/branch||United States Army|
|Years of service||1950–1954|
|Unit||Medical Detachment Division|
Joseph Michael Arpaio (//; born June 14, 1932) is a former American law enforcement officer. He was the elected Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona for 24 years, from 1993 until 2016, when he lost re-election to Democrat Paul Penzone.
Arpaio styled himself as "America's Toughest Sheriff". Starting in 2005, he took an outspoken stance against illegal immigration. In 2010, he became a flashpoint for opposition to Arizona's SB1070 anti-illegal immigrant law, which was largely struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court. Arpaio is also known for investigating former U.S. President Barack Obama's birth certificate, and, as of 2016[update], he continued to claim that it was forged.
Arpaio has been accused of various types of police misconduct, including abuse of power; misuse of funds; failure to investigate sex crimes; improper clearance of cases; unlawful enforcement of immigration laws; and election law violations. A Federal court monitor was appointed to oversee his office's operations because of complaints of racial profiling. The U.S. Department of Justice concluded that Arpaio oversaw the worst pattern of racial profiling in U.S. history, and subsequently filed suit against him for unlawful discriminatory police conduct. Arpaio's office paid more than $146 million in fees, settlements, and court awards.
Over the course of his career Arpaio was the subject of several federal civil rights lawsuits. In one case he was a defendant in a decade-long suit in which a federal court issued an injunction barring him from conducting further "immigration round-ups". A federal court subsequently found that after the order was issued, Arpaio's office continued to detain "persons for further investigation without reasonable suspicion that a crime has been or is being committed." In July 2017, he was convicted of criminal contempt of court, a crime for which he was pardoned by President Donald Trump on August 25, 2017. In a separate racial-profiling case which concluded in 2013, Arpaio and his subordinates were found to have unfairly targeted Hispanics in conducting traffic stops.
- 1 Early life
- 2 Tenure as sheriff 1993–2016
- 2.1 Jail conditions
- 2.2 Tent city jail
- 2.3 Claims that sheriff's office failed to properly investigate serious crimes
- 2.4 Targeting of political opponents
- 2.5 Election law violation
- 2.6 Misspending analysis
- 2.7 Misconduct and mismanagement memo
- 2.8 Wrongful arrest and entrapment lawsuit and settlement
- 2.9 Abuse of power investigation
- 2.10 Immigration patrols
- 3 Federal class action suit
- 4 Melendres v. Arpaio racial-profiling class-action lawsuit
- 5 Litigation on jail conditions
- 6 Justice Department investigation on racial profiling
- 7 Birther movement
- 8 Conviction for contempt of court
- 9 Trump Presidential pardon
- 10 Election results
- 11 Personal life
- 12 Works
- 13 References
- 14 External links
Arpaio was born in Springfield, Massachusetts, on June 14, 1932, to Italian parents, both from Lacedonia, Italy. Arpaio's mother died while giving birth to him, and he was raised by his father. Arpaio completed high school and worked in his father's business until age 18 when he enlisted in the United States Army. He served in the Army from 1950 to 1954 in the Medical Department and was stationed in France for part of the time as a military policeman.
Following his army discharge in 1954, Arpaio moved to Washington, D.C., and became a police officer, moving in 1957 to Las Vegas, Nevada. He served as a police officer in Las Vegas for six months before being appointed as a special agent with the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, which later became part of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). During his 25-year tenure with the DEA, he was stationed in Argentina, Turkey, and Mexico, and advanced through the ranks to the position of head of the DEA's Arizona branch.
After leaving the DEA, Arpaio became involved in a travel venture through his wife's travel agency Starworld Travel Agency, based in Scottsdale. While there, he sold passage on the Phoenix E space rocket, which was hoped to take off from either Edwards Air Force Base or Vandenberg Air Force Base on the 500th anniversary of Christopher Columbus' voyage to the new world. Although he claimed in 1988 that the first 19 flights of the Phoenix E had been booked, no flights were ever made.
Tenure as sheriff 1993–2016
Arpaio was first elected as sheriff in 1992. He was re-elected in 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008 and 2012. Throughout his tenure as sheriff, Arpaio sought out media coverage. He was featured and profiled by worldwide news media and claimed to average 200 television appearances per month. In late 2008 and early 2009, Arpaio appeared in Smile...You're Under Arrest!, a three-episode Fox Reality Channel series in which persons with outstanding warrants were tricked into presenting themselves for arrest.
Arpaio's jail detention practices included serving inmates edibles recovered from food rescue and limiting meals to twice daily. He also banned inmates from possessing "sexually explicit material" including Playboy magazine, after female officers complained that inmates openly masturbated while viewing the articles. The ban was challenged on First Amendment grounds, but was upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. In February 2007, Arpaio instituted an in-house radio station he called KJOE, broadcasting classical music, opera, Frank Sinatra hits, patriotic music, and educational programming five days a week, four hours each day.
In 2013, National Geographic Channel featured Arpaio's jail in the Banged Up Abroad episode of "Raving Arizona". The episode told the story of the Ecstasy dealer Shaun Attwood who started the blog Jon's Jail Journal.
Arpaio set up a "Tent City" in 1993 as an extension of the Maricopa County Jail for convicted and sentenced prisoners. Arpaio described Tent City as a concentration camp. Tent City was located in a yard next to a more permanent structure. On July 2, 2011, when the temperature in Phoenix hit 118 °F (48 °C), Arpaio measured the temperature inside Tent City tents at 145 °F (63 °C). Some inmates complained that fans near their beds were not working, and that their shoes were melting from the heat. During the summer of 2003, when outside temperatures exceeded 110 °F (43 °C), Arpaio said to complaining inmates, "It's 120 degrees in Iraq and the soldiers are living in tents and they didn't commit any crimes, so shut your mouths!"
Tent city jail
In 1997, Amnesty International said Arpaio's tent city jail was not an "adequate or humane alternative to housing inmates in suitable ... jail facilities." Tent City was criticized by groups contending that there were violations of human and constitutional rights. Arpaio stated he reserved the punishment of living in Tent City "for those who have been convicted." In April 2017, it was announced by newly elected Sheriff Paul Penzone that the jail would be shut down.
In 1995, Arpaio reinstituted chain gangs. In 1996, he expanded the chain gang concept by instituting female volunteer chain gangs. Female inmates worked seven hours a day (7 a.m. to 2 p.m.), six days a week. He also instituted the world's first all-juvenile volunteer chain gang; volunteers earned high school credit toward a diploma. One of Arpaio's public relations actions was the requirement that inmates wear pink underwear in order to prevent its theft by the released inmates. He claimed this saved the county $70,000 in the first year the rule was in effect. Arpaio subsequently started to sell customized pink boxers (with the Maricopa County Sheriff's logo and "Go Joe") as a fund-raiser for Sheriff's Posse Association. Despite allegations of misuse of funds received from these sales, Arpaio declined to provide an accounting for the money.
Arpaio's success in gaining press coverage with the pink underwear resulted in his extending the use of the color. He introduced pink handcuffs, using the event to promote his book, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, America's Toughest Sheriff. Arpaio has said "I can get elected on pink underwear... I've done it five times." In 2004, Arpaio ordered all undocumented immigrants currently in jail to register for the Selective Service System.
In November 2010, Arpaio created an armed illegal immigration operations posse to help his deputies enforce immigration law. Members of the posse included actors Steven Seagal, Lou Ferrigno, and Peter Lupus. Because the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (MCSO) lost its authority to enforce immigration law (both by losing its 287(g) authority and through the Federal court's order in Melendrez v. Arpaio), the posse is no longer active. While the MCSO website claimed 3,000 posse members, as of July 29, 2015, the posse had 986 members.
Arpaio was a controversial sheriff. His practices were criticized by government agencies such as the United States Department of Justice; United States District Courts; and organizations such as Amnesty International, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU); the Arizona Ecumenical Council; the American Jewish Committee; and the Arizona chapter of the Anti-Defamation League. The editorial board of The New York Times called Arpaio "America's Worst Sheriff". Controversies surrounding Arpaio included allegations of racial profiling, for which the ACLU sued the sheriff.
Claims that sheriff's office failed to properly investigate serious crimes
In 2000 it was claimed that the sheriff's office failed to properly investigate serious crimes, including the rape of a 14-year-old girl by classmates, and the rape of a 15-year-old girl by two strangers. These cases were reported as "exceptionally cleared" (solved) by the MCSO without investigation or, in one instance, without even identifying a suspect – in contravention of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) standards for exceptional clearance. In the case of the 15-year-old girl, the case was closed within one month and before DNA testing was even complete, a 13-year-old's because her mother did not want to "pursue this investigation," and the 14-year-old's because a suspect declined to appear for questioning. In a statement to ABC15, the sheriff's office claimed "The Goldwater Institute’s report cites the FBI’s Uniform Code [sic] Reporting handbook, which is a voluntary crime-reporting program to compile statistical information and reports. The UCR is not intended for oversight on how law enforcement agencies clear cases... The Sheriff’s Office has its own criteria for clearing cases." The Arizona Department of Public Safety, which serves as the repository for Arizona case clearance statistics, told 12 News that the guidelines in the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook are mandatory for all Arizona law enforcement agencies. Those guidelines specify that a case can be cleared by exception only when a perpetrator's identity and location is known and there is sufficient evidence to support prosecution, but, due to special circumstances (such as the suspect dying, or extradition not being possible), an arrest cannot be made.
In an interview on the ABC's Nightline news program, when asked to explain why 82 percent of cases were declared cleared by exception, Arpaio said, "We do clear a higher percentage of that. I know that. We clear many, many cases – not 18 percent." Nightline contacted the MCSO after the interview and was told that of 7,346 crimes, only 944, or 15%, had been cleared by arrest.
Sex crime investigations
During a three-year period ending in 2007, more than 400 sex crimes reported to Arpaio's office were inadequately investigated or not investigated at all. While providing police services for El Mirage, Arizona, the MCSO under Arpaio failed to follow through on at least 32 reported child molestations, even though the suspects were known in all but six cases. Many of the victims were children of illegal immigrants.
In a controversial case, Arpaio's office was accused of ignoring Sabrina Morrison, a teenage girl suffering from a mental disability. On March 7, 2007, the 13-year-old was raped by her uncle, Patrick Morrison. She told her teacher the next day, and her teacher called the MCSO. A rape kit was taken, but the detective assigned to the case told Sabrina and her family that there were no obvious signs of sexual assault, no semen, or signs of trauma.
As a result of the detective's statements, Sabrina was branded by her family as a liar. Her uncle continued to rape her repeatedly, saying he would kill her if she told anyone. She became pregnant by him, and had an abortion. The family did not know that the rape kit had been tested at the state lab and showed the presence of semen. The lab requested that the detective obtain a blood sample from the suspect, Patrick Morrison. Instead of obtaining the blood sample, or making an arrest, the detective filed the crime-lab note and closed the case for four years.
In September 2011 the sheriff's office obtained a blood sample from Patrick Morrison, which was a DNA match with the semen taken over four years earlier. Patrick Morrison was arrested and charged in February 2012; he pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 24 years in prison.
In December 2011, responding to continuing media coverage of the controversy, and apparently unaware that there were hundreds of victims in these cases, Arpaio stated in a press conference, "If there were any victims, I apologize to those victims."
An internal memo written by one of the detectives assigned to the Morrison case blamed a high case load, saying the special victims unit had gone from five detectives to just three, and the detectives left were often called off their cases to investigate special assignments. These included a credit card fraud case involving the Arizona Diamondbacks and a mortgage fraud case in Arpaio's home city of Fountain Hills.
When county supervisors provided more than $600,000 to fund six additional detective positions to investigate child abuse in fiscal 2007, none were added to the sex-crimes squad. Sheriff’s administrators concluded they had no idea where positions were added or what became of the money after it was added to the budget.
Targeting of political opponents
Between 2008 and 2010, Arpaio and former Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas together undertook a number of government-corruption investigations targeting political opponents, including judges, county supervisors and administrators, resulting in filing of criminal charges against several individuals, lawsuits against the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, and a federal civil-racketeering suit against the supervisors, four judges, and attorneys who worked with the county.
In early 2010, Arpaio and Thomas sought to have a grand jury indict a number of Maricopa County judges, Maricopa County supervisors, and employees of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. The grand jury, in an unusual rebuke, ordered the investigation ended. This action has been described as meaning that "the case is so bad, there's no further evidence that could be brought" to substantiate it. Legal experts agreed this was a rare move.
Arpaio and Thomas lost every case, either by ruling of the courts or by dropping the case.
Arpaio's and Thomas' actions in these matters led to Thomas' disbarment by a disciplinary panel of the Arizona Supreme Court, which found that Thomas "outrageously exploited power, flagrantly fostered fear, and disgracefully misused the law" while serving as Maricopa County Attorney. The panel found "clear and convincing evidence" that Thomas brought unfounded and malicious criminal and civil charges against political opponents, including four state judges and the Arizona Attorney General. "Were this a criminal case," the panel concluded, "we are confident that the evidence would establish this conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt."
- Gary Donahoe, retired Superior Court judge: $1,275,000 settlement. County legal expenses: $767,127.
- Kenneth Fields, retired Superior Court judge: $100,000 settlement. County legal expenses: $81,040.
- Barbara Mundell, retired Superior Court judge: $500,000 settlement. County legal expenses: $134,273.
- Anna Baca, retired Superior Court judge: $100,000 settlement. County legal expenses: $112,588.
- Stephen Wetzel, former county technology director: $75,000 settlement. County legal expenses: $107,647.
- Sandi Wilson, deputy county manager and county budget director: $122,000 settlement. County legal expenses: $458,318.
- Don Stapley, former county supervisor: $3.5 million settlement. County legal expenses: $1,682,020.
- Mary Rose Wilcox, county supervisor: $975,000 settlement, plus $9,938 in court-ordered legal costs. County legal expenses to date: over $375,442.
- Susan Schuerman, Stapley’s executive assistant: $500,000 settlement. County legal expenses: $200,201.
- Conley Wolfswinkel, Stapley’s business associate: $1,400,000 settlement. County legal expenses: $1,586,152.
- Andy Kunasek, county supervisor: $123,110 settlement. County legal expenses: $1,150.
In 2008, a federal grand jury began an inquiry of Arpaio for abuse of power in connection with an FBI investigation. On August 31, 2012, the Arizona U.S. Attorney's office announced that it was "closing its investigation into allegations of criminal conduct" by Arpaio, without filing charges.
Arpaio was investigated for politically motivated and "bogus" prosecutions, which a former U.S. Attorney called "utterly unacceptable". Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon called Arpaio's "long list" of questionable prosecutions "a reign of terror".
The targets of Arpaio's alleged abuse of power included:
- Phil Gordon, Phoenix Mayor
- Dan Saban, Arpaio's 2004 and 2008 opponent for the office of Sheriff of Maricopa County
- Terry Goddard, Arizona Attorney General
- David Smith, Maricopa County Manager
- The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors
- Barbara Mundell, Maricopa Superior Court Presiding Judge
- Anna Baca, former Maricopa Superior Court Presiding Judge
- Gary Donahoe, Maricopa Superior Court Criminal Presiding Judge
- Daniel Pochoda, ACLU attorney
- Sandra Dowling, former Maricopa County School Superintendent
- Mike Lacey, Editor, Phoenix New Times
As of July 2010, only Sandra Dowling had been successfully prosecuted. Indicted on 25 felony counts, Dowling eventually pleaded guilty to patronage for giving a summer job to her daughter, a single class-2 misdemeanor which was not among the original counts, although as part of the plea bargain she also agreed to recuse herself from the Maricopa County Regional School District. Dowling later filed suit, alleging negligence, malicious prosecution, abuse of process and several constitutional violations, although Arpaio won summary judgment against her claims.
Mike Lacey and Jim Larkin, the founders and leaders of the Phoenix New Times, were arrested after publishing a news article on a grand jury investigation involving Arpaio's office. On the evening that the article was published, Lacey and Larkin were arrested by plainclothes sheriff's deputies, "handcuffed, put in dark SUVs with tinted windows and driven to jail." Following a public uproar over the arrests, all charges were dropped against Lacey and Larkin. Lacey and Larkin filed a federal Section 1983 lawsuit for the violations of their civil rights, and in 2012 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that they could sue the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office for the arrests. In 2013, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors voted to settle the suit for $3.75 million. Lacey and Larkin used the proceeds of the settlement to establish an endowed chair professorship at the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication.
Election law violation
In July 2010, a committee established by Arpaio (the "Campaign to Re-Elect Joe Arpaio 2012") funded advertisements critical of Rick Romley, a candidate in the Republican primary for Maricopa County Attorney, and Arizona Attorney General candidate Tom Horne, despite the fact that Arpaio was not running for re-election at the time (his term did not expire until the end of 2012).
In August 2010, following the filing of complaints to the Maricopa Elections Department, the Office of Maricopa County Attorney found that one of the advertisements, a direct mailer, advocated the defeat of Romley and was an in-kind contribution to Bill Montgomery (Romley's primary election opponent), in violation of Arizona election law. The order stated that a civil penalty in the amount of three times the amount of money spent on the mailer would be imposed on Campaign to Re-Elect Joe Arpaio 2012. In September 2010, Arpaio's campaign was fined $153,978. Montgomery ultimately defeated Romley in the primary election, with Romley stating Arpaio's ads "hurt" his results.
The analysis showed that money from a restricted detention fund which could legally be used only to pay for jail items, such as food, detention officers' salaries, and equipment, was used to pay employees to patrol Maricopa County. The analysis also showed that many sheriff's office employees, whose salaries were paid from the restricted detention fund, were working job assignments different from those recorded in their personnel records. Arpaio's office kept a separate set of personnel books detailing actual work assignments, different from information kept in the county's official human resources records.
Separate investigations by The Arizona Republic uncovered widespread abuse of public funds and county policies by Arpaio's office, including high-ranking employees routinely charging expensive meals and stays at luxury hotels on their county credit cards.
The Republic also found that a restricted jail-enhancement fund was improperly used to pay for out-of-state training, a staff party at a local amusement park, and a $456,000 bus which Arpaio purchased in violation of county procurement rules.
Misconduct and mismanagement memo
In September 2010, a 63-page internal memo written by Maricopa Deputy Chief Frank Munnell, was made public. The memo alleged years of misconduct and mismanagement by Arpaio's second-in-command and other top MCSO officers, including the use of a public-corruption task force to conduct politically motivated probes into political opponents. The memo alleged that top officials in the MCSO "willfully and intentionally committed criminal acts by attempting to obstruct justice, tamper with witnesses, and destroy evidence." Arpaio forwarded the memo to the Pinal County Sheriff's Office, requesting they conduct an administrative investigation. Former top MCSO staffers claimed that Arpaio knew of the acts alleged in the Munnell memo, but took no action to stop them. Arpaio has not commented publicly on the allegations.
In October 2010, the U.S. Attorney for Arizona confirmed that the FBI and Department of Justice had received copies of the Munnell memo and were conducting criminal investigations into its allegations.
Wrongful arrest and entrapment lawsuit and settlement
In 1999, undercover MCSO deputies arrested James Saville, then 18 years old, and charged him with plotting to kill Arpaio with a pipe bomb. A local television station had been tipped off to the arrest by the MCSO, and broadcast footage of the arrest that evening. The MCSO held a news conference shortly after the arrest, and Arpaio appeared in interviews on local television stations, saying "If they think they are going to scare me away with bombs and everything else, it's not going to bother me."
In July 2003, after spending almost four years in jail awaiting trial, Saville was acquitted by a Maricopa County Superior Court jury. Jurors were persuaded that Saville had been entrapped by the MCSO as part of an publicity stunt by Arpaio. This was a rare example of a successful entrapment defense, which is very difficult to prove. Jurors interviewed following the trial said that "they were convinced that Saville had been a pawn in an elaborate media ploy." The jury forewoman subsequently said: "This was a publicity stunt at the expense of four years of someone's life." Another juror stated that "This was a big setup from the beginning."
In 2004, Saville, following the acquittal, sued Arpaio and Maricopa County for wrongful arrest and entrapment. In 2008, the suit was settled, with Maricopa County paying Saville $1.1 million. Saville also received an unspecified additional compensation from the county's insurance company.
Abuse of power investigation
|This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (August 2017)|
As of December 2011, a federal grand jury was investigating Arpaio's office on criminal abuse-of-power allegations since at least December 2009 and was specifically examining the investigative work of the sheriff's anti-public corruption squad.
On August 31, 2012, federal authorities announced they were terminating their abuse-of-power investigation into Arpaio in Arizona without filing charges against him.
In 2005, Arpaio began focusing on enforcing immigration laws, after Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas was elected with a campaign slogan of "Stop illegal immigration." Arpaio stated that prior to 2005, he didn't view illegal immigration as a "serious legal issue."
Starting in 2005, Arpaio regularly conducted saturation patrols and immigration sweeps, targeting Latino neighborhoods and day laborers. Arpaio also ran many operations targeting businesses employing Latinos, and arresting employees who were unauthorized immigrants for identity theft. According to Arpaio, 100% of the persons arrested for using stolen IDs in 57 raids conducted up until March 2012 were in the country illegally. Until 2011, when a Federal District Court injunction halted the practice, Arpaio maintained an immigrant smuggling squad which illegally stopped cars with Latino drivers or passengers to check their immigration status.
Arpaio has said of his immigration law enforcement efforts, "Ours is an operation where we want to go after illegals, not the crime first... It's a pure program. You go after them, and you lock them up."
Federal class action suit
In 2007 Manuel De Jesus Ortega Melendres, a Mexican tourist who was a passenger in a car stopped in Cave Creek, Maricopa County, filed a lawsuit (Melendres v. Arpaio) in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona against Sheriff Arpaio, the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, and Maricopa County, claiming to have been detained unlawfully for nine hours as a result of racial profiling. The lawsuit was expanded when several individuals joined in with similar complaints.
The lawsuit charged that Sheriff Arpaio and the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) unlawfully instituted a pattern and practice of targeting Latino drivers and passengers in Maricopa County during traffic stops, and that MCSO’s practices discriminated on the basis of race in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and resulted in prolonged traffic stops and baseless extended detentions in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
The case was initially assigned to U.S. District Judge Mary Murguia. In June 2009, in response to a motion filed by Arpaio's lawyers, she recused herself. The case was then assigned to U.S. District Judge G. Murray Snow.
In his September 2009 deposition in the case, Arpaio testified he had never read the complaint in the case, was unfamiliar with the details of the allegations of racial profiling therein, didn't know the content of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and had never read the Department of Justice's guidelines concerning the use of race in investigations, which would have applied to his deputies in the field when they were still operating under a 287(g) program agreement with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). He insisted, however, that his deputies didn't profile based on ethnicity or race.
- "Sheriff Arpaio has made public statements that a fact finder could interpret as endorsing racial profiling, such as stating that, even lacking 287(g) authority, his officers can detain people based upon 'their speech, what they look like, if they look like they came from another country'... Moreover, he acknowledges that MCSO provides no training to reduce the risk of racial profiling, stating 'if we do not racial profile, why would I do a training program?'" Judge Snow expanded the complaint into a class-action lawsuit, including all Latino drivers stopped by the Sheriff's Office since 2007, or who will be stopped in the future. He also enjoined the MCSO and all of its officers from "detaining any person based only on knowledge or reasonable belief, without more, that the person is unlawfully present within the United States, because as a matter of law such knowledge does not amount to a reasonable belief that the person either violated or conspired to violate the Arizona human smuggling statute, or any other state or federal criminal law." 
Melendres v. Arpaio racial-profiling class-action lawsuit
On December 23, 2011, U.S. District Court Judge G. Murray Snow enjoined Arpaio and the MCSO from "detaining any person based only on knowledge or reasonable belief, without more, that the person is unlawfully present within the United States," halting anti-illegal immigration enforcement by MCSO in its current form.
Arpaio filed an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The court upheld Judge Snow's injunction.
Starting July 19, 2012, a six-day bench trial was held before Judge Snow. On May 24, 2013, Judge Snow issued a decision finding the policies and practices of Arpaio and his office discriminatory, in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
In June 2013, the DOJ filed a Statement of Interest in the case, recommending the appointment of an "independent monitor to assess and report on MCSO’s compliance with the remedial measures ordered by the Court." Adopting the DOJ's recommendation, in August 2013 Judge Snow stated in a court hearing that he would be assigning an independent monitor.
In October 2013, Judge Snow issued a 59-page final order, giving the MCSO a list of reforms and requirements to institute and follow. In January 2014, Judge Snow appointed Robert Warshaw, former Rochester, New York, police chief, to act as monitor over the MCSO.
Arpaio filed a limited appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, contesting the district court's order, insofar as it covered traffic stops outside of saturation patrols. The appeals court rejected this claim, upholding Judge Snow's inclusion of non-saturation patrols in his finding of racial profiling, and maintaining his rulings of corrective actions that included training and video recording of traffic stops. The appeals court did agree with Arpaio that the court-appointed monitor's oversight of internal investigations must only be related to the constitutional violations.
Subsequent to Judge Snow's October 2013 order, Arpaio was videotaped during a training session for MCSO deputies, saying "we don't racially profile. I don't care what everybody says." As a result of this, and mischaracterizations of the court's order by MCSO Chief Deputy Jerry Sheridan, Snow convened a hearing in March 2014 where he chastised Arpaio and Sheridan, saying they had "defied and even mocked his order to stop singling out Latinos during routine patrols, traffic stops and workplace raids." He then ordered Arpaio's attorney to prepare a corrective letter setting the record straight, to be distributed to all MCSO deputies. Because of Arpaio's First Amendment free speech rights, the court did not require him to personally sign the corrective letter.
Two days after the hearing, having just been rebuked for mocking the court's order, Arpaio sent out a fundraising letter complaining of "Rampant UNFOUNDED [sic] charges of racism and racial profiling in my office." Judge Snow responded to this fundraising letter, stating:
- "I want to be careful and say that the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office has used race – has illegitimately used race as a factor, and to the extent that constitutes racial profiling, that's what it is and that's what I found and the sheriff is saying that people have wrongfully accused him of that as of last Wednesday, which was after the meeting in which he was here.
- "So to the extent that I have a sheriff, who I'm not going to prohibit from mischaracterizing my order publicly, to the extent that I have an MCSO that is rife with a misunderstanding of my order and a mischaracterization of it when they are the people that have to understand it and implement it, I have grave concerns..."
On September 11, 2014, Judge Snow granted more than $4.4 million in attorney’s fees to four legal organizations that litigated Melendres v. Arpaio. Attorney’s fees were granted to the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project, the ACLU of Arizona, MALDEF, and Covington & Burling.
The article quoted unnamed sources, including a former detective with the MCSO's Special Investigations Division, who claimed that the investigation was being run directly by Arpaio and was based on his belief that Judge Snow and the DOJ had engaged in a conspiracy against him.
Arpaio neither confirmed nor denied the investigation to the Phoenix New Times. However, in an April 2015 civil contempt hearing before Judge Snow, Arpaio testified that his attorney, Tim Casey, had hired a private investigator to investigate Judge Snow's wife, and that the MCSO had paid Dennis L. Montgomery to investigate whether the DOJ had been penetrating Arpaio's e-mails as well as those of local attorneys and judges, including Judge Snow. (This was called the "Seattle Operation.") Subsequently, MCSO Chief Deputy Jerry Sheridan testified that there was no investigation into Snow, his wife, or his family. As a result of the potential for ethical conflicts arising from Arpaio's and Sheridan's testimony, Casey withdrew as legal counsel for Arpaio and the MCSO.
During a status conference on May 14, 2015, Judge Snow, reading from a prepared statement, said that documents unearthed from the "Seattle Operation" by the court-appointed monitor revealed "an attempt to construct a conspiracy involving this court" as well as other entities and individuals including the DOJ, former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, former Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon, and ex-MCSO Executive Chief Brian Sands, among others. One week after this status conference, Arpaio's criminal defense attorney filed a motion to disqualify Judge Snow, claiming that he had moved from being an independent arbiter in the case into the role of investigating "issues involving his own family." Judge Snow temporarily halted further hearings in the case, but ultimately denied the motion and resumed holding hearings. On August 7, 2015, Arpaio asked the Ninth Circuit to remove Judge Snow from the case. On September 15, 2015, the Ninth Circuit denied Arpaio's request to remove Judge Snow, as well as Arpaio's related request to halt the lower court's proceedings.
As part of the contempt proceedings, Judge Snow concluded Arpaio and others had made intentionally false statements about the efforts to investigate him.
Litigation on jail conditions
Graves v. Arpaio: federal court finding of unconstitutional jail conditions
Federal Judge Neil V. Wake ruled in 2008, and again in 2010, that the county jails violated the constitutional rights of inmates in medical and other care-related issues. This ruling was a result of a lawsuit brought by the ACLU which alleged that "Arpaio routinely abused pre-trial detainees at Maricopa County Jail by feeding them moldy bread, rotten fruit and other contaminated food, housing them in cells so hot as to endanger their health, denying them care for serious medical and mental health needs, and keeping them packed as tightly as sardines in holding cells for days at a time during intake."
In a ruling issued in October 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ordered Arpaio to comply with Judge Wake's 2008 ruling, which required Arpaio to end the overcrowding and to ensure all detainees received necessary medical and mental health care; be given uninterrupted access to all medications prescribed by correctional medical staff; be given access to exercise and to sinks, toilets, toilet paper and soap; and be served food that met or exceeded the U.S. Department of Agriculture's dietary guidelines.
Braillard v. Maricopa County: wrongful death suit and settlement
In 2005, Deborah Braillard, a diabetic was arrested and detained in county jail on a minor drug-possession charge. Without medical attention, Braillard soon became ill. Although Braillard "groaned and cried for help as she defecated and vomited on herself and others," guards refused to listen to pleas to medical treatment for Braillard, who went into a diabetic coma and died while chained to a hospital bed.
In the subsequent wrongful death of Braillard v. Maricopa County, the plaintiff's attorney cited numerous reports commissioned and paid for by Maricopa County, dating back as far as 1996, detailing a "culture of cruelty" where inmates were routinely denied humane healthcare at Maricopa County jails run by Arpaio. Testifying in this case, Arpaio stated he could not deny making the statement that even if he had a billion dollars he wouldn’t change the way he runs his jails. Arpaio said his jails were meant as places for punishment, and that the inhabitants were all criminals, although in fact most inmates had not been convicted of a crime and were awaiting trial.
In the litigation, the former medical director for the country jails and other witnesses testified on the destruction of evidence, specifically "about evidence in the case being swiped and deleted from his computer." In 2012, after the judge assigned to the case "that the jury was to be told about the MCSO's coverup, including missing jail videos and recordings of Braillard's phone calls," the county settled the litigation for $3.25 million. The county spent an additional $1.8 million in legal fees on the Braillard case.
Justice Department investigation on racial profiling
In June 2008, the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division began an investigation of Arpaio amid accusations of discrimination and unconstitutional searches and seizures. The investigation was conducted under the authority of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which forbids discrimination related to programs that receive federal funds.
On July 7, 2009, Arpaio held a press conference and announced that he would not cooperate with the investigation, either by providing documents or permitting interviews with personnel. On September 2, 2010, the Department of Justice filed suit against Arpaio to compel his cooperation with the investigation. A spokeswoman for the Justice Department stated that it was unprecedented for an agency to refuse to cooperate with a Title VI investigation, and that this was the first time the Justice Department had sued to compel access to documents and facilities. The suit was settled in June 2011, after Arpaio allowed federal officials to interview Sheriff's office employees and review hundreds of thousands of documents for the investigation.
On December 15, 2011, the Justice Department released their findings after a 3-year investigation of Arpaio's office amid complaints of racial profiling and a culture of bias at the agency's top level. The report stated that under Arpaio, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office has "a pervasive culture of discriminatory bias against Latinos" that "reaches the highest levels of the agency."
The Justice Department accused Arpaio of engaging in "unconstitutional policing" by unfairly targeting Latinos for detention and arrest, and retaliating against critics. In the report, a Justice Department expert concluded that Arpaio oversaw the worst pattern of racial profiling in U.S. history.
Based on the Justice Department report on discriminatory policing practices within the MCSO, on December 15, 2011, the United States Department of Homeland Security removed the MCSO from the 287(g) program. This decision revoked the MCSO's federal authority to identify and detain illegal immigrants.
United States v. Maricopa County
On May 10, 2012, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) in United States v. Maricopa County, et al (Case number 2:12-cv-981), filed suit against Arpaio, the MCSO, and Maricopa County, alleging that "The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) and Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio have engaged and continue to engage in a pattern or practice of unlawful discriminatory police conduct directed at Latinos in Maricopa County and jail practices that unlawfully discriminate against Latino prisoners with limited English language skills." The complaint included accusations that Arpaio and his staff forced women to sleep in their own menstrual blood, assaulted pregnant women, ignored rape, and criminalized being a Latino.
The United States’ claims in this suit encompassed, but were broader than, the unconstitutional discriminatory conduct that the Court in Melendres v. Arpaio found the MCSO to have engaged in concerning its immigration enforcement-related traffic stops.
A DOJ representative said that the agency was left with no choice but to file suit after Arpaio's attorneys balked at a demand for a court-appointed monitor to ensure the sheriff's office complied with any settlement terms. Arpaio rejected the notion of a court-appointed monitor, and denied that the MCSO engaged in racial profiling.
On June 15, 2015, Senior United States District Judge Roslyn O. Silver of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona entered partial summary judgment for the DOJ, and against Arpaio, on the central racial-profiling allegations in the suit. On July 15, Maricopa County's board of supervisors voted to settle the lawsuit. The partial settlement, however, did not resolve the claims of discriminatory policing.
At two press conferences held in March 2012, Arpaio and members of his Cold Case Posse claimed that President Barack Obama's long-form birth certificate, released by the White House on April 27, 2011, is a computer-generated forgery. The Posse also claimed that Obama's Selective Service card was a forgery. The allegations regarding the birth certificate were repeated at a July 2012 news conference in which Arpaio stated that Obama's long-form birth certificate was "definitely fraudulent."
Some of the major claims presented by Arpaio were subsequently shown to be false; specifically, the 1961 Vital Statistics Instruction Manual that Arpaio and his team claimed to possess contradicted what they claimed it said, and images shown by them, purportedly from that manual, were instead from computer specifications dated 1968 and 1969.
In response to Arpaio's claims, Joshua A. Wisch, a special assistant to the Attorney General of Hawaii, said in a statement, "President Obama was born in Honolulu, and his birth certificate is valid. Regarding the latest allegations from a sheriff in Arizona, they are untrue, misinformed and misconstrue Hawaii law." Arizona state officials, including Governor Jan Brewer and Secretary of State Ken Bennett, also dismissed Arpaio's objections and accepted the validity of Obama's birth certificate. Brewer also stated that Obama’s mother’s U.S. citizenship made him a citizen by jus sanguinis, regardless of where he was born.
During September 2016, Arpaio claimed to be still investigating President Obama's birth certificate, stating, "We are looking at a forged document. Period." On December 15, 2016, Arpaio held a news conference along with posse member Mike Zullo, detailing "9 points of forgery" supposedly found on the digital image of Obama's birth certificate.
In 2007, Arpaio said that it was an "honor" for his department to be compared to the Ku Klux Klan, a white supremacist terrorist organization. On the witness stand in a civil trial in 2012, however, Arpaio backtracked, saying that he longer considered the comparison an honor.
Conviction for contempt of court
In December 2014, after many warnings, U.S. District Judge G. Murray Snow told Arpaio there was a very real possibility that he would refer Arpaio to the U.S. Attorney's Office for criminal prosecution on contempt of court charges due to the MCSO's failure to comply with the court's order to stop its racial profiling practices. Snow advised Arpaio to retain a criminal defense attorney. In a bid to shield Arpaio from criminal proceedings, his attorneys filed a written statement arguing that any mistakes in complying with the court's orders were unintentional, or the fault of former employees. Judge Snow found Arpaio's arguments unavailing, and, in January 2015, announced that Arpaio would face a contempt hearing in April 2015 for violating court orders in Melendres v. Arpaio.
In March 2015, a month before the scheduled contempt hearing, Arpaio admitted that he violated several court orders, and consented to a finding of civil contempt against him. Because the matter of criminal contempt was still at issue, the initial contempt hearing was held as scheduled.
On May 13, 2016, the court held Arpaio in contempt on three counts. On August 19, 2016, the court asked the federal government to file criminal contempt charges against Arpaio and some of his subordinates over his failure to follow the court's instructions. On October 11, 2016, federal prosecutors announced that they would press criminal contempt of court charges against Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, such charges were officially filed, though Arpaio would not be arrested and no mugshot would be taken. The charges were filed just two weeks before an election in which Arpaio was running for re-election.
On July 31, 2017, Arpaio was found guilty of criminal contempt of court. U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton wrote that Arpaio had "willfully violated an order of the court" by failing "to ensure his subordinates' compliance and by directing them to continue to detain persons for whom no criminal charges could be filed." Arpaio was scheduled to be sentenced in October 2017.
Trump Presidential pardon
On August 25, 2017, President Donald Trump pardoned Arpaio for his conviction for criminal contempt of court, a decision that provoked considerable controversy The pardon covers Arpaio's conviction and "any other offenses under Chapter 21 of Title 18, United States Code that might arise, or be charged, in connection with Melendres v. Arpaio." The official White House statement announcing the grant of clemency described Arpaio as a "worthy candidate" having served the nation for more than fifty years "protecting the public from the scourges of crime and illegal immigration." The full text read as follows:
Trump also announced his decision on Twitter, declaring that Arpaio is an "American patriot" who had "kept Arizona safe." In a statement several days later, Trump said that he had timed the issuance of the pardon to gain maximum television views during Hurricane Harvey coverage, stating, "in the middle of a hurricane, even though it was a Friday evening, I assumed the ratings would be far higher than they were normally."
Arpaio expressed his thanks to the President in a series of tweets in which he described himself as "humbled and incredibly grateful," also expressing thanks to his "loyal supporters." Arpaio also declared that his conviction was "a political witch hunt by holdovers in the Obama justice department!" The Washington Post fact-checker gave the claim "Four Pinocchios" (its worst rating), noting that Arpaio was convicted by two federal judges; a Bush-appointed federal judge, and federal judge respected by both Republicans and Democrats. Attorneys for Arpaio have stated that they are moving for his case to be dismissed in light of the pardon.
At the time the pardon was granted, the Washington Post revealed that Trump had asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions months before if the government could drop its case against Arpaio. On August 13, 2017, President Trump told Fox News that he was "seriously considering a pardon" for Arpaio. Days after being criticized for his comments following the Charlottesville rally, President Trump announced that he would be holding a campaign rally in Phoenix, Arizona. The Mayor of Phoenix, Greg Stanton, repeatedly called for the rally to be postponed in light of Charlottesville, and stated that Trump should apologize having "inflamed racial tension across the country as a result of this failure of moral leadership." Stanton specifically urged that Arpaio not be granted a pardon and stated that an announcement at the rally would make it "clear that [President Trump's] true intent is to inflame emotions and further divide our nation." During the rally, Trump asked rhetorically whether "Sheriff Joe [was] convicted for doing his job" and declared that Arpaio "should have had a jury"; these comments were greeted with strong approval by the attendees. The rally's tone was described as "angry" (NPR's Domenico Montanaro described it as "incendiary," stating that Trump had "ripped at cultural divides [and] played to white grievance"), but he stopped short of issuing the pardon; Trump made his intention clear, however, stating that "I'll make a prediction. I think [Arpaio's] going to be just fine ... But I won't do it tonight because I don't want to cause any controversy."
Reactions to pardon
Arizona Governor Doug Ducey was among the politicians praising the pardon, crediting Arpaio with helping to reduce crime over a long career, and Ducey also welcomed the finality that the pardon gave to the whole matter. The pardon was strongly criticized by Arizona Senator John McCain as Arpaio had expressed no remorse for his actions, McCain also stating that the action undermined Trump's professed respect for the rule of law. Arizona Senator Jeff Flake said that he "would have preferred that the President honor the judicial process and let it take its course". House Speaker Paul Ryan signaled his opposition to the pardon.
A number of law professors and political scientists described the pardon as troubling and unusual. Experts also said that the pardon sent a permissive signal to people in law enforcement to commit unlawful acts. Legal scholars have offered different views as to the legal ramifications of Trump's pardon. For instance, Harvard University Professor of Constitutional Law Noah Feldman argued that issuing this pardon would be an impeachable offence under the U.S. Constitution, for if Trump "pardoned Arpaio for willfully refusing to follow the Constitution and violating the rights of people inside the U.S.", it would demonstrate contempt for the judiciary, the Constitution and the rule of law. According to Northwestern law professor Martin Redish, Trump's pardon could be challenged in court and lead to limits being imposed on the heretofore unlimited power to pardon, if Trump's pardon is seen as a signal "to government agents that there exists the likelihood of a pardon when they violate a judicial injunction that blocks his policies, he can all too easily circumvent the only effective means of enforcing constitutional restrictions on his behavior".
However, Cornell law professor Josh Chafetz argued that the problem with the pardon was not so much the process (as the president's power on this issue is broad and unqualified), but rather that "Arpaio’s entire claim to national recognition was based on his being a xenophobe, a racist and an officer of the machinery of government who relished wielding that machinery to degrade some of the most powerless members of our society." Cornell law professor Jens David Ohlin said that he was disturbed by the pardon, as it was part of a troubling pattern of disrespect towards the role of the judiciary within the constitutional structure. Adam Liptak, attorney and Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times, questioned the wisdom of the pardon but not its legitimacy: "It was the first act of outright defiance against the judiciary by a president who has not been shy about criticizing federal judges who ruled against his businesses and policies. But while the move may have been unusual, there is nothing in the text of the Constitution’s pardons clause to suggest that he exceeded his authority. The president, the clause says, 'shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.' The pardon power extends only to federal crimes. Otherwise, presidents are free to use it as they see fit. As the Supreme Court put it in an 1866 decision involving a former Confederate senator, Ex Parte Garland, the power 'is unlimited.'"
Several experts on authoritarianism described the pardon as illiberal and said that it undermined the rule-of-law. The political scientist Andrew Rudalevige notes that presidential pardons are "granted for two reasons: either to provide mercy or correct a miscarriage of justice, in an individual case; or on more general grounds based on public policy," and that the pardon of Arpaio fits neither category.
The editorial boards of The Arizona Republic, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, The Boston Globe, San Francisco Chronicle, USA Today, and The Washington Examiner condemned the pardon. Columnist David Frum of The Atlantic criticized the pardon, noting that the timing of the pardon during Hurricane Harvey was to ensure that there would be minimal scrutiny of the decision to pardon an individual who "along with ferocious abuses of his law-enforcement powers in Maricopa County... also made a name for himself as America’s second-most famous Obama Birther, next only to the current president of the United States." Columnist Robert Robb of The Arizona Republic, who says that "facts don't matter" to either side in the debate about Trump's pardon of Arpaio, wrote that the pardon does not represent an endorsement of racism, that Trump had some basis to say that Arpaio was convicted for doing his job, but that Arpaio was not deserving of a pardon. Paul Krugman of the New York Times interpreted the pardon as a signal that President Trump would protect "those who might be tempted to make deals with the special investigator as the Russia probe closes in on the White House."
|Republican||Joe Arpaio (incumbent)||572,063||66.5||n/a|
|Republican||Joe Arpaio (incumbent)||642,923||56.7||−9.8|
|n/a||Steven W. Martin||142,296||12.6||n/a|
|Republican||Joe Arpaio (incumbent)||730,426||55.2||−1.5|
|Libertarian||Chris A.H. Will||35,425||2.7||n/a|
|Republican||Joe Arpaio (incumbent)||679,967||50.7%||−4.5%|
|Republican||Joe Arpaio (incumbent)||665,581||43.48%||-7.18%|
|Democratic gain from Republican|
Failed recall petitions, 2007 and 2013
In November 2007, a group calling itself Arizonans for the U.S. Constitution and Recall of Joe Arpaio filed the paperwork to begin an effort to recall Arpaio and County Prosecutor Thomas from office for allegedly disobeying and violating the United States Constitution and abuse of power. Their petition to get a recall question for the two officials onto the next general election ballot failed when the group was unable to collect the more than 200,000 registered voter signatures required. In a survey taken by the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication, while the petition was in circulation, nearly three out of four respondents opposed the recall, and 65 percent of the respondents held a positive opinion of Arpaio.
On May 30, 2013, a recall attempt on Arpaio again failed only a week after a federal judge ruled that the sheriff's office had engaged in systematic discrimination against Latinos in violation of their constitutional rights. Members of Respect Arizona and Citizens for a Better Arizona started the recall effort, but were unable to get the required 335,000 valid voter signatures by the 5 p.m. deadline.
- Arpaio, Joe; Sherman, Len (1996). America's Toughest Sheriff: How to Win the War Against Crime. New York City: Summit Publishing Group. p. 262. ISBN 1-56530-202-8.
- Arpaio, Joe; Sherman, Len (2008). Joe's Law: America's Toughest Sheriff Takes on Illegal Immigration, Drugs and Everything Else That Threatens America. New York City: AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn. p. 272. ISBN 0-8144-0199-6.
- Kiefer, Michael (September 11, 2015). "Sheriff Joe Arpaio has always done it his way: Chapter 2; A lone wolf from the outset". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved September 14, 2015.
- Janofsky, Michael (May 16, 2002). "Another Plot Against Tough Sheriff, With a Twist". The New York Times. Retrieved July 14, 2010.
- The original source for the sobriquet "America's Toughest Sheriff" is unknown, however both Arpaio and his press relations staff promote its use. Note Arpaio's book, titled "America's Toughest Sheriff."
- JONATHAN J. COOPER (AP) – August 15, 2010 (August 15, 2010). "Tea party activists rally on Arizona-Mexico border". Google.com. Associated Press. Retrieved August 29, 2010.
- Barnes, Robert (June 25, 2012). "Supreme Court Rejects Much of Arizona Immigration Law". The Washington Post.
- Cohen, Tom; Mears, Bill (June 26, 2012). "Supreme Court mostly rejects Arizona immigration law; gov says 'heart' remains". CNN.
- "At a glance: Supreme Court decision on Arizona's immigration law". CNN. Retrieved June 26, 2012.
- "Arpaio: Obama birth record definitely forged". CBS News. July 17, 2012. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- "Sheriff Joe Arpaio, still a 'birther,' says 5-year investigation proves Obama birth certificate is 'fake'". azcentral. Retrieved 2017-08-28.
- Morris, David Z. "Trump, Playing to His Base, Pardons Anti-Immigrant Sheriff Joe Arpaio". Fortune. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
- "With a pardon from Trump, Arpaio remains above the law". Retrieved August 26, 2017.
- "Trump pardons ex-Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio". Reuters. August 26, 2017. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
- Washington, Julia Carrie Wong Lauren Gambino in (August 26, 2017). "Donald Trump pardons Joe Arpaio, former sheriff convicted in racial profiling case". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
- Roberts: Joe Arpaio just cost you another $4.5 million
- Megan Cassidy, Former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio found guilty of criminal contempt of court, The Arizona Republic (July 31, 2017).
- Moore, Lindsay; Flaherty, Joseph (August 25, 2017). "Sheriff Joe Arpaio gets pardon from Donald Trump". The Phoenix New Times. Retrieved August 25, 2017.
- Santos, Fernanda (May 24, 2013). "Federal Judge Finds Violations of Rights by Sheriff Joe Arpaio". The New York Times. Retrieved August 24, 2017.
- Arpaio, Joe (2008). "Growing up". Re-Elect Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Committee to Re-Elect Joe Arpaio. Archived from the original on January 29, 2008. Retrieved January 29, 2008.
- "OSIA Honors Sheriff Arpaio". encyclopedia.com. April 1, 2008. Retrieved July 14, 2010.
- Terry Greene Sterling (December 16, 2011). "Sheriff Joe Arpaio Slammed in Federal Civil Rights Probe Report". thedailybeast.com.
- Arpaio, Joe (2008). "Joining the Army". Re-Elect Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Committee to Re-Elect Joe Arpaio. Archived from the original on December 18, 2008. Retrieved December 18, 2008.
- "Re-elect Sheriff Joe Arpaio 2012". encyclopedia.com. Archived from the original on December 18, 2008. Retrieved July 14, 2010.
- "Joe Arpaio DEA Officer". sheriffjoe.org. Archived from the original on December 18, 2008. Retrieved July 14, 2010.
- "Arpaios trips to space". phoenixnewtimes.com. Retrieved November 4, 2014.
- "Apaio's travel agency offers 'affordable' bookings on space flights". azcentral.com. Retrieved November 4, 2014.
- "Maricopa County Election Results". maricopa.gov.
- Fernanda Santos (August 1, 2012). "When a Taste for Publicity Bites Back". The New York Times.
- David Carr (January 4, 2009). "A Star Turn for a Sheriff on Fox TV". The New York Times.
- Zoellner, Tom (November 24, 2008). "Janet Napolitano's embarrassing history with Sheriff Joe Arpaio". Slate.com. Retrieved August 29, 2010.
- "Sheriff runs female chain gang". CNN. October 29, 2003. Retrieved May 6, 2010.
- "Mauro v Arpaio". FindLaw. August 17, 1999.
- "Arpaio Launches KJOE Radio". KPHO.com. February 5, 2007. Archived from the original on March 25, 2007. Retrieved August 20, 2008.
- Hensley, JJ; Collom, Lindsey (October 23, 2008). "Judge backs county inmates in jail case". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved May 17, 2010.
- Hensley, JJ (April 8, 2010). "Judge: County failed to improve jails' medical, mental-health conditions". Retrieved May 17, 2010.
- Video on YouTube
- "Jon's Jail Journal (by Shaun Attwood)". Jonsjailjournal.blogspot.co.uk. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Blog". Shaunattwood.com. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Media Requests". Shaunattwood.com. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Tent City Jail". Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. MCSO. Archived from the original on January 17, 2015.
- Video on YouTube
- "Two Americans video footage". Twoamericans.com. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- The Honorable Jeffrey S. Cates, Judge (September 26, 2002). "Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County, Cause No. CV 97-008668" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 7, 2009.
- Scott, Eugene (July 3, 2011). "Temperatures rise to 145 inside Tent City". Azcentral.com. Retrieved September 29, 2011.
- Ananda Shorey (July 25, 2003). "Phoenix is sizzling through what could be the hottest July on record". signonsandiego.com. Archived from the original on October 9, 2007. Retrieved October 20, 2007.
- Tony Ortega (September 18, 1997). "Human Plights – Page 1 – News – Phoenix". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved September 29, 2011.
- "Blog of Rights: Official Blog of the American Civil Liberties Union » Sheriff Joe's Inhumane Circus". Aclu.org. Retrieved August 29, 2010.
- Yu, Esther (August 2, 2013). "Twenty Years Of In-Tents Treatment: How Sheriff Joe Arpaio Put Racism On Display". ThinkProgress. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "The Problem With Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Tent City". Abcnews.go.com. July 29, 2013. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Kennedy, Merritt (April 5, 2017). "Joe Arpaio's Infamous Tent City Jail In Maricopa County Will Shut Down". " The Two-Way Breaking News From NPR". National Public Radio. Retrieved April 5, 2017.
- "Anderson Cooper 360 transcript". CNN. March 10, 2004. Retrieved March 4, 2009.
- "CNN reporter Eric Phillips interviews Sheriff Arpaio and a juvenile offender". CNN. March 11, 2004. Retrieved October 20, 2007. (CNN Live Today transcript)
- "Custody Operations: Laundry Services". Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. Archived from the original on May 18, 2015. Retrieved May 8, 2015.
- Tony Ortega (May 27, 1999). "Blowing His Cool". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved June 19, 2008.
- "Not Pretty In Pink". The Smoking Gun. January 14, 2005. Retrieved June 19, 2008.
- Lemons, Stephen (October 18, 2012). "Joe Arpaio Obliterated in New TV Ads by Citizens for Professional Law Enforcement". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- "Sheriff Arpaio: "I could be elected on pink underwear"". YouTube. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- "'Illegals' in jail ordered to register for draft". Associated Press. January 16, 2004.
- "Hollywood actors join Arpaio's immigration posse". Phoenix Newswebsite=azfamily.com. Archived from the original on January 10, 2011. Retrieved February 10, 2011.
- Lemons, Stephen (June 5, 2013). "Bad Conscience". Phoenix New Times digital issue.
- Lemons, Stephen (July 29, 2015). "Joe Arpaio's Incredibly Shrinking Posse (w/Update)". Phoenix New Times.
- "Ill-treatment of inmates in Maricopa County jails, Arizona". Amnesty International. August 1, 1997. Archived from the original on September 9, 2003.
- "Valley rabbis' statement on Sheriff Joe Arpaio". Jewish News of Greater Phoenix. July 24, 2009. Archived from the original on October 29, 2010.
- "Phoenix Mayor Gordon calls for FBI investigation of Arpaio". The Arizona Republic. April 13, 2008. Archived from the original on July 18, 2012.
- New York Times editorial board (December 31, 2008). "America’s Worst Sheriff (Joe Arpaio)". The New York Times.
- "ACLU Sues Maricopa County Sheriff's Office For Illegal Arrest And Detention Of U.S. Citizen And Legal Resident". Aclu.org. August 19, 2009. Retrieved August 29, 2010.
- "Sheriff Arpaio Sued over Racial Profiling of Latinos in Maricopa County". Aclu.org. American Civil Liberties Union. July 16, 2008. Retrieved August 29, 2010.
- Fenske, Sarah (May 28, 2009). "How the MCSO Neglected a 14-Year-Old Rape Victim". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved June 7, 2012.
- Bernstein, Josh (May 21, 2009). "Sexual assault victim claims MCSO failed to do its job". ABC15. Archived from the original on May 23, 2009.
- "The Pulitzer Prizes | Works". Pulitzer.org. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Gabrielson, Ryan (July 12, 2008). "Reasonable Doubt: Public pays the price". East Valley Tribune. The Pulitzer Prizes. Archived from the original on March 3, 2013. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- "Victim Power". Victim Power. Retrieved October 24, 2010.
- Dana, Joe (January 19, 2010). "Many MCSO cases solved without arrests". azcentral.com. 12 News. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Sheriff Joe Arpaio Unapologetic About Tactics, Illegal Immigrant Crackdowns". Abcnews.go.com. ABC News. July 23, 2009. Retrieved October 24, 2010.
- Bolick, Clint (May 21, 2009). [h "Justice Denied: The Improper Clearance of Unsolved Crimes by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office"] Check
|url=value (help). Goldwater Institute. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Bolick, Clint (December 2, 2008). "Mission Unaccomplished: The Misplaced Priorities of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office". Goldwater Institute. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Goldwater Institute: Arpaio’s crime clearance rate a sham". AzCapitolTimes.com. May 22, 2009. Retrieved June 7, 2012.
- Richardson, Bill (May 27, 2009). "The numbers don’t match Arpaio’s hype". East Valley Tribune. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Billeaud, Jacques (December 4, 2011). "Critics: 'Tough' sheriff botched sex-crime cases". Boston.com. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- Lemons, Stephen (August 20, 2012). "Joe Arpaio's Deputy Told to Work Fraud Cases Instead of Child Rape Crime". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- Lemons, Stephen (September 28, 2012). "Rape victim opens up about botched MCSO investigation". CBS 5. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- Lacey, Marc (December 9, 2011). "Arpaio Is Criticized Over Handling of Sex-Crimes Cases". The New York Times.
- Loew, Morgan (February 27, 2013). "Rape victim opens up about botched MCSO investigation". KPHO. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- Stern, Ray (April 9, 2015). "Maricopa County to Pay $3.5 Million for Botched Sheriff's Office Rape Investigation". Phoenix New Times.
- Lemons, Stephen (August 20, 2012). "Joe Arpaio's Deputy Told to Work Fraud Cases Instead of Child Rape Crime". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- "Arpaio’s office continues to investigate sex-crime cases". Casa Grande Dispatch. October 2, 2012. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- Hee, Michelle Ye. "Maricopa County supervisors settle lawsuits filed by ‘New Times’ founders, Stapley". Azcentral.com. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Maricopa County feud: What happens next?". The Arizona Republic. August 15, 2009.
- Wingett, Yvonne (September 15, 2010). "Maricopa County's officials tab for feuding hits $5.6 million". Azcentral.com. Retrieved September 23, 2010.
- Rudolf, John (April 11, 2012). "Arizona Prosecutor Disbarred For Plotting Bad Arrests With 'America's Toughest Sheriff'". Huffington Post.
- Lemons, Stephen (April 19, 2012). "Andy Thomas Needs a Perp Walk With His Papi, Sheriff Joe Arpaio". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Wingett, Yvonne (December 6, 2010). "Investigator to recommend disbarment in Thomas ethics case". Azcentral.com. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Mary Rose Wilcox awarded $975,000 from Arpaio suit". Azcentral.com. June 2, 2014. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Hee, Michelle Ye. "Maricopa County infighting, lawsuits cost taxpayers $44.4 million". Azcentral.com. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Wingett, Yvonne (February 25, 2010). "Supervisor cases collapse". Azcentral.com. Retrieved September 23, 2010.
- "Sources: FBI Investigating Joe Arpaio". KPHO. October 30, 2009. Archived from the original on October 20, 2010. Retrieved July 10, 2010.
- Conder, Chuck (July 10, 2010). "Arizona sheriff under investigation for alleged abuse of power". CNN. Retrieved July 10, 2010.
- "Feds close criminal investigation into Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio". Fox News. August 31, 2012. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- "Judges file claims accusing Joe Arpaio, Andrew Thomas for abuse of power". The Arizona Republic. May 28, 2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010.
- "Dowling sues Arpaio, county for prosecution". The Arizona Republic. June 4, 2009.
- Anne Ryman & Michael Kiefer, Even Arpaio likes lawsuit proceeds funding ASU journalism program, The Arizona Republic (December 17, 2014).
- Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 F.3d. 896 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc).
- Wingett, Yvonne (August 24, 2010). "Joe Arpaio's campaign mailers violate rules, elections panel finds". Azcentral.com. Retrieved September 2, 2010.
- "Office of Maricopa County Attorney : Campaign Finance Proceeding" (PDF). Azcentral.com. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Lemons, Stephen (September 14, 2010). "Joe Arpaio Fined $154K for "In-Kind Contribution" to Bill Montgomery (w/Update)". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved September 23, 2010.
- Mike Sakal. "Arpaio campaign fined for illegal mailers targeting Romley". East Valley Tribune. Retrieved September 2, 2010.
- Wingett, Yvonne. "Joe Arpaio's office misspent funds, analysis says". Azcentral.com. Retrieved September 23, 2010.
- Wingett, Yvonne. "Joe Arpaio's office misused up to $80 million, Maricopa County says". Azcentral.com. Retrieved September 23, 2010.
- Sanchez, Yvonne Wingett (April 13, 2011). "Joe Arpaio's staff misspent $99.5 million, budget officials say". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- Sarah Buduson (June 28, 2007). "Maricopa Officials: Arpaio's Spending Illegal". KPHO-TV. Archived from the original on June 14, 2011. Retrieved September 23, 2010.
- Wingett, Yvonne (August 8, 2010). "Maricopa County Sheriff's Office spent loosely". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved September 23, 2010.
- Wingett, Yvonne (August 18, 2009). "Audit sought on how jail fund is spent by Maricopa County Sheriff's Office". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved September 23, 2010.
- Lemons, Stephen (September 16, 2010). "Joe Arpaio's Watergate: Read MCSO Deputy Chief Frank Munnell's Memo Here (w/Update) – Phoenix News – Feathered Bastard". Blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com. Retrieved February 10, 2011.
- Lemons, Stephen (September 17, 2010). "Joe Arpaio Knows All, and David Hendershott's His Lackey, Say Former Staffers and Critics". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved February 10, 2011.
- Wingett, Yvonne (October 6, 2010). "Joe Arpaio aide's misconduct allegations investigated by U.S. Attorney's Office, FBI". Azcentral.com. Retrieved February 10, 2011.
- Dougherty, John (August 5, 1999). "The Plot To Assassinate Arpaio". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- Bommersbach, Jana. Will Sheriff Joe Stop at Nothing?, PHOENIX Magazine, February 2005.
- Carol Sowers, Man cleared of plot to bomb Sheriff Arpaio, Arizona Republic (February 2005).
- Dougherty, John (June 24, 2004). "In the Crosshairs". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- Dickerson, John (October 28, 2008). "A Phony Murder Plot Against Joe Arpaio Winds Up Costing Taxpayers $1.1 Million". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- Billeaud, Jacques (December 15, 2011). "Feds say Arpaio violated civil rights". azfamily.com. Archived from the original on January 8, 2012.
- Howerton, Jason. "FEDS DROP CRIMINAL CASE AGAINST SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO". The Blaze. Retrieved September 1, 2012.
- "EJ Montini | Insiders". Azcentral.com. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- Pettersson, Edvard (July 25, 2012). "Arizona’s Arpaio Testifies Race Not Factor in Arrests". Bloomberg Business. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Bogado, Aura (May 1, 2009). "Arpaio vs. Immigrants: Those most affected left out of debate". FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- "Reasonable Doubt". East Valley Tribune. July 2008. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- Fernández, Valeria (July 27, 2012). "Attorneys Allege 'Culture of Discrimination' in Arpaio’s Office". New America Media. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- Hendley, Matthew (March 15, 2012). "Joe Arpaio Runs Another "Employer Sanctions Operation" – Get This – Zero of 31 Arrested Are Employers". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- "Melendres v. Arpaio – Decision on Sanctions Regarding Adverse Inferences at Trial". American Civil Liberties Union. March 18, 2015. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Feds: Ariz. Sheriff Arpaio violated civil rights". CBS News. December 15, 2011. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- Fernández, Valeria (July 25, 2012). "Two Faces of Arpaio Revealed in Trial". New America Media. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- "Ortega Melendres, et al. v. Arpaio, et al.". American Civil Liberties Union. July 10, 2012. Retrieved July 16, 2012.
- Horwitz, Sari (May 10, 2012). "Justice to Sue Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- Santos, Fernanda (July 19, 2012). "Sheriff Joe Arpaio Trial Opens in Phoenix". The New York Times.
- Hensley, JJ (August 1, 2012). "Racial-profiling trial: Former MCSO deputy testifies". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- "Ortega Melendres, et al. v. Arpaio, et al.". American Civil Liberties Union. September 25, 2012. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- Lemons, Stephen (December 30, 2009). "Joe Arpaio, Clueless or Cunning? Sheriff Does His Sgt. Schultz Impersonation During Seven Hour Depo in Racial Profiling Lawsuit". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- "Arizona: Sheriff's Office Punished in Profiling Case". The New York Times. December 24, 2011.
- "UPDATED: Judge Punishes Sheriff Arpaio’s Office for Document Destruction | Albuquerque Journal News". Albuquerque Journal. December 23, 2011. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Melendres v. Arpaio – Decision on Motions for Summary Judgment". American Civil Liberties Union. March 18, 2015. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Stern, Ray (December 23, 2011). "Joe Arpaio Can be Sued by Detained Hispanics: Judge Grants Class Status in Lawsuit to Hispanics Stopped by Arpaio's Deputies, Orders Halt to Human-Smuggling Enforcement in Current Form". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio Loses Immigration Law Appeal". Fox News. September 26, 2012.
- J. J. Hensley (July 8, 2012). "Joe Arpaio's legacy in the balance with lawsuit outcome". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved July 16, 2012.
- "Federal Court Rules Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio Violated U.S. Constitution". Retrieved May 25, 2013.
- "Ortega Melendres, et al. v. Arpaio, et al. – Decision". Retrieved May 25, 2013.
- "Office of Maricopa County Attorney : Campaign Finance Proceeding" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Schwartz, David (August 30, 2013). "Judge plans to appoint monitor for controversial Arizona sheriff". Reuters. Retrieved September 5, 2013.
- Lemons, Stephen (April 24, 2014). "Arpaio Will Continue to Defy Judge Snow Until He's Held in Contempt". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Court largely upholds racial-profiling ruling against Sheriff Joe Arpaio". The Arizona Republic. April 15, 2015. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Fernanda Santos, Angry Judge Says Sheriff Defied Order on Latinos, The New York Times (March 24, 2014).
- Lemons, Stephen (March 24, 2014). "Joe Arpaio, Jerry Sheridan Spanked by Judge G. Murray Snow Over Melendres Remarks". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Lemons, Stephen (March 28, 2014). "Joe Arpaio Lies About Racial Profiling, and MCSO Deputies Screw Up on Video (Again)". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Lemons, Stephen (April 25, 2014). "Joe Arpaio Wants Out of Part of Judge's Latest Order, and MCSO Flack Jack MacIntyre Mischaracterizes Melendres". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Arizona District Court Judge Grants Over $4 million in Attorney Fees to Civil Rights Groups in Landmark Lawsuit Against Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO)". American Civil Liberties Union. September 11, 2014.
- Lemons, Stephen (June 4, 2014). "Joe Arpaio's Investigating Federal Judge G. Murray Snow, DOJ, Sources Say, and Using a Seattle Scammer To Do It". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Arpaio: PI hired to investigate judge's wife". The Arizona Republic. April 24, 2015. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Joffe-Block, Jude (May 8, 2015). "Man Sheriff Joe Arpaio Hired To Investigate Federal Agencies Tries To Intervene In Contempt Case". KJZZ (FM). Archived from the original on May 18, 2015.
- "Arpaio immigration case attorney quits, citing ethical conflicts". Arizona Daily Star. April 28, 2015. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Arpaio civil-contempt hearing recap: Case of surprises". The Arizona Republic. April 25, 2015. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Lemons, Stephen (May 15, 2015). "Snow Blasts Arpaio's "Bogus Conspiracy Theory"". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Sheriff Joe Arpaio contempt case to resume in September". KNXV-TV. July 20, 2015.
- "Arpaio moves to remove judge on racial-profiling case". The Arizona Republic. May 22, 2015. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Sheriff Joe Arpaio Contempt Hearing Delayed Due To Recusal Request". KJZZ. June 2, 2015. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Arpaio foes oppose sheriff's request to disqualify judge – ABC15 Arizona". KNXV-TV . June 13, 2015. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Lemons, Stephen (July 10, 2015). "Arpaio's Epic Fail: Judge Refuses to Recuse Self in Melendres". Phoenix New Times.
- "Arpaio asks appeals court to recuse judge in profiling case". KPHO-TV. August 7, 2015.
- "Sheriff Joe Arpaio loses bid to disqualify judge from profiling case". KNXV-TV. September 15, 2015.
- "Sheriff Joe Arpaio in contempt of federal court, judge rules". The Arizona Republic. May 13, 2016.
- "Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals Orders Sheriff Arpaio To Fix Unconstitutional Conditions In Maricopa County Jail". American Civil Liberties Union. October 13, 2010. Retrieved February 10, 2011.
- "Graves, et al. v. Arpaio, et al. – Opinion". American Civil Liberties Union. October 13, 2010. Retrieved February 10, 2011.
- "Fred Graves and Isaac Popoca v. Joseph Arpaio" (PDF). United States District Court for the District of Arizona. October 22, 2008. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- "Fred Graves, Isaac Popoca, et al. v. Joseph Arpaio" (PDF). United States District Court for the District of Arizona. April 7, 2010. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- Chung, Joanna (October 14, 2010). "Sheriff Joe Told to Clean Up His Jails — Again". The Wall Street Journal Law Blog. Retrieved February 10, 2011.
- Stephen Lemons, Joe Arpaio's Victim Deborah Braillard: Family Agrees to $3.2 Million Settlement, ABC15 Reports, Phoenix New Times (October 17, 2012).
- Braillard v. Maricopa County, 232 P. 3d 1263 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).
- "Key evidence in Maricopa County Jail death suit of Deborah Braillard 'destroyed'". KNXV-TV. August 23, 2010. Archived from the original on February 2, 2013. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- Tony Ortega (May 29, 1997). "Joe Assumes Deposition". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- "Civil Rights Division Maricopa County Sheriffs Office Investigation". United States Department of Justice. December 15, 2011. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Frieden, Terry (September 2, 2010). "Justice Department lawyers sue Arizona sheriff in civil rights probe". CNN. Retrieved September 2, 2010.
- Wingett, Yvonne. "Sheriff Joe Arpaio sued by Justice Department in civil-rights probe". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved September 2, 2010.
- "Justice Department lawsuit involving Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio". Azdatapages.com. Archived from the original on September 7, 2010. Retrieved September 23, 2010.
- "United States of America v. Maricopa County, Arizona" (PDF). Azcentral.com. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Wingett, Yvonne (June 2, 2011). "Feds settle lawsuit vs. Arpaio's office". Azcentral.com. Retrieved September 29, 2011.
-  Archived January 8, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
- Billeaud, Jacques. "Feds say Arpaio violated civil rights". Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 3, 2012. Retrieved December 15, 2011.
- Lacey, Marc (December 15, 2011). "Sheriff's Arpaio's Office Targeted Latinos, U.S. Says". The New York Times.
- Ray Stern (December 15, 2011). "Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Office Commits Worst Racial Profiling in U.S. History, Concludes DOJ Investigation". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved May 28, 2012.
- Ray Stern (December 15, 2011). "Feds Pull 287(g) Authority From Maricopa County Jails Because of Civil Rights Violations". Phoenix New Times. Retrieved May 28, 2012.
- Israel, Josh (August 30, 2012). "Appeals Court Reinstates Civil Rights Lawsuit Against Joe Arpaio". Thinkprogress.org. Retrieved August 28, 2017.
- J. J. Hensley (May 10, 2012). "U.S. sues Arpaio's office over treatment of Latinos". azcentral.com. The Arizona Republic. Retrieved May 28, 2012.
- "Plaintiff v. Maricopa County, Arizona" (PDF). Azcentral.com. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Judge rules in favor of DOJ in suit against Arpaio". Azcentral.com. June 16, 2015. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Kiefer, Michael (July 15, 2015). "County votes to settle DOJ lawsuit vs. Arpaio". The Arizona Republic.
- Joffe-Block, Jude (July 15, 2015). "Maricopa County Agrees To Settle Part Of Racial Profiling Case". KJZZ.
- "White House: birth certificate" (PDF).
- "Sheriff Arpaio says Obama's birth certificate is forged". CBS News.
- In February 2012, Mike Zullo, the "MCSO Cold Case Posse Chief Investigator" and Jerome Corsi, a conspiracy theorist, published a book, A Question of Eligibility: A Law Enforcement Investigation into Barack Obama's Birth Certificate and His Eligibility to be President, repeating the claims. Arpaio wrote the introduction. Paperless Publishing LLC (February 29, 2012), Amazon Digital Services, Inc., ASIN B007FWO19W
- "Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio: Obama birth record 'definitely fraudulent'". Daily News (Los Angeles). The Associated Press. July 17, 2012. Retrieved July 18, 2012.
- "Exposed: Sheriff Joe Arpaio Birther Scam – Here’s the Proof that Arpaio's Posse Fabricated Evidence and Lied to the Nation". July 24, 2012. Retrieved November 17, 2013.
- "Joe Arpaio: Obama birth certificate a fraud". Politico. Associated Press. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Brewer disagrees with Arpaio findings, believes Obama birth record real". East Valley Tribune. Tempe, AZ. March 6, 2012.
- "Arizona Officially Accepts Obama's Birth Record". Fox News Latino. May 23, 2012.
- Nick Gass (September 21, 2016). "Sheriff Arpaio on Obama birth certificate: 'I'm not going to give up'". Politico. Retrieved October 12, 2016.
- Megan Cassidy (December 15, 2016). "Sheriff Joe Arpaio: 5-year investigation proves Obama birth certificate is fake'". The Republic. Retrieved December 16, 2016.
- "Ariz. sheriff backtracks on praise for KKK". Associated Press. July 24, 2012.
- Sean Holstege (December 5, 2014). "Judge fed up with Arpaio defiance". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- "Judge: Arpaio will face contempt hearing in April". The Arizona Republic. January 16, 2015. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Megan Cassidy (March 19, 2015). "Arpaio admits contempt of court, offers public acknowledgement". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
- Cassidy, Megan (July 25, 2015). "Judge sends marshals to seize evidence from Sheriff Joe Arpaio". The Arizona Republic.
- Hutcherson, Kimberly (August 20, 2016). "Judge seeks criminal contempt charges against Sheriff Joe Arpaio". CNN.
- Gonzales, Richard (October 11, 2016). "Feds Will Press Criminal Contempt Charges Against Ariz. Sheriff Arpaio". NPR. Retrieved October 11, 2016.
- "Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio is officially charged with criminal contempt in racial profiling case". Associated Press. October 25, 2016.
- Logan, Bryan (August 26, 2017). "Trump pardons former Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio". Business Insider. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
- Byrnes, Jesse; Easley, Jonathan (August 25, 2017). "Trump pardons former Sheriff Joe Arpaio". The Hill. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- Wong, Julia Carrie; Gambino, Lauren (August 27, 2017). "Donald Trump pardons Joe Arpaio, former sheriff convicted in racial profiling case". The Guardian. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- Chaitin, Daniel (August 26, 2017). "Here is the pardon Trump signed for Joe Arpaio". Washington Examiner. Archived from the original on August 27, 2017. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
Text of the pardon itself: "Be it known that this day, I, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, pursuant to my powers under Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution, have granted unto Joseph M. Arpaio a full and unconditional pardon for his conviction of Section 401(3), Title 18, United States Code (Docket No. 2:16-CR-01012-SRB) in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, of which he was convicted on July 31, 2017, and for which sentencing is currently set for October 5, 2017; and, for any other offenses under Chapter 21 of Title 18, United States Code that might arise, or be charged, in connection with Melendres v. Arpaio (Docket No. 2:07-CV-02513-GMS) in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. In testimony whereof, I have hereunto signed my name and caused the seal of the Department of Justice to be affixed.
- Adam, Kelsey (August 25, 2017). "Trump pardons controversial former Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio". ABC News. Retrieved August 25, 2017.
- Davis, Julie Hirschfeld; Haberman, Maggie (August 25, 2017). "Trump Pardons Joe Arpaio, Who Became Face of Crackdown on Illegal Immigration". The New York Times. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
- Trump, Donald J. [@realDonaldTrump] (August 25, 2017). "I am pleased to inform you that I have just granted a full Pardon to 85 year old American patriot Sheriff Joe Arpaio. He kept Arizona safe!" (Tweet). Archived from the original on August 26, 2017. Retrieved August 27, 2017 – via Twitter.
- Glenn Thursh & Julie Hirschfeld Davis, Trump Eyed ‘Far Higher’ Ratings in Pardoning Joe Arpaio as Hurricane Hit, New York Times (August 28, 2017).
- Ashley Parker, Trump defends Arpaio pardon, assumed 'ratings would be far higher' by announcing during hurricane, Washington Post (August 28, 2017).
- Arpaio, Joe [@RealSheriffJoe] (August 25, 2017). "Thank you @realdonaldtrump for seeing my conviction for what it is: a political witch hunt by holdovers in the Obama justice department!" (Tweet). Archived from the original on August 27, 2017. Retrieved August 27, 2017 – via Twitter.
- Arpaio, Joe [@RealSheriffJoe] (August 25, 2017). "I am humbled and incredibly grateful to President Trump. I look fwd to putting this chapter behind me and helping to #MAGA" (Tweet). Archived from the original on August 26, 2017. Retrieved August 27, 2017 – via Twitter.
- Arpaio, Joe [@RealSheriffJoe] (August 25, 2017). "I also thank my loyal supporters, who stood shoulder to shoulder w/ me in this fight, and throughout my career. For those who are asking . ." (Tweet). Archived from the original on August 26, 2017. Retrieved August 27, 2017 – via Twitter.
- "Analysis | Was former Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio’s criminal conviction an Obama ‘political witch hunt’?". Washington Post. Retrieved 2017-08-30.
- Rucker, Philip; Nakashima, Ellen (August 26, 2017). "Trump asked Sessions about closing case against Arpaio, an ally since 'birtherism'". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
- Jarrett, Gregg (August 14, 2017). "Trump 'seriously considering' a pardon for ex-Sheriff Joe Arpaio". Fox News. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
- House, Billy; Epstein, Jennifer (August 12, 2017). "Trump Panned for 'Many Sides' Condemnation of Virginia Violence". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on August 13, 2017. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- Thrush, Glenn; Haberman, Maggie (August 12, 2017). "Trump's Remarks on Charlottesville Violence Are Criticized as Insufficient". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 13, 2017. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- Bradner, Eric (August 23, 2017). "Donald Trump defends Charlottesville responses, omits reference to 'many sides'". CNN. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- Stolberg, Sheryl; Rosenthal, Brian M. (August 12, 2017). "Man Charged After White Nationalist Rally in Charlottesville Ends in Deadly Violence". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 12, 2017. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- Fausset, Richard; Feuer, Alan (August 13, 2017). "Far-Right Groups Surge Into National View In Charlottesville". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 16, 2017. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- "Phoenix Mayor Doesn't Want President Trump's Rally in His City Next Week". NBC News. Associated Press. August 16, 2017. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- Silva, Daniella (August 22, 2017). "Phoenix Mayor Calls on Trump to Apologize at Rally for Charlottesville Comments". NBC News. Associated Press. Retrieved August 27, 2016.
- "Joe Arpaio: Donald Trump signals presidential pardon for controversial sheriff". The Guardian. Associated Press. August 23, 2017. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- Bykowicz, Julie (August 23, 2017). "Trump talks unity, but detours into angry words for media". Associated Press News. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- Montanaro, Domenico (August 23, 2017). "5 Truths About Trump Displayed In His Phoenix Rally". NPR. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- "The Latest: Senator critical of Trump’s pardon of Arpaio", Associated Press via Washington Post (August 26, 2017): "Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey and Arizona congressman Andy Biggs are supporting the presidential pardon of former metro Phoenix sheriff Joe Arpaio."
- "McCain critical of president's pardon of Arpaio", Associated Press via ABC News (August 26, 2017): "Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey and Arizona congressman Andy Biggs are supporting the presidential pardon of former metro Phoenix sheriff Joe Arpaio. Ducey says Arpaio 'deserves credit for helping to reduce crime in Maricopa County over his long career in law enforcement and public office.' He says Trump's pardon 'has brought finality to this chapter in Arizona's history.' Ducey adds that Arpaio is his friend and now the 85-year-old ex-lawman can move on and enjoy his retirement with his wife and family."
- Levine, Sam (August 26, 2017). "John McCain Rips Donald Trump For Pardoning Joe Arpaio". Huffington Post. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
- Manchester, Julia (August 25, 2017). "Flake: Trump should have honored judicial process on Arpaio pardon". TheHill. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
- "Critics: Trump pardon his latest affront against judiciary". Washington Post. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- Legal scholar on why the Arpaio pardon is "troubling", retrieved August 26, 2017
- Liptak, Adam (August 26, 2017). "Why Trump’s Pardon of Arpaio Follows Law, Yet Challenges It". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
- "The message behind the pardon". Axios. August 26, 2017. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
- "Analysis | What authoritarianism experts think of Trump’s decision to pardon Joe Arpaio". Washington Post. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- Haberman, Maggie. "Trump’s Brand of Law and Order Leaves Leeway on the Law". Retrieved 2017-08-28.
- Feldman, Noah (August 24, 2017). "Arpaio Pardon Would Show Contempt for Constitution". Bloomberg News. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
- Redish, Martin H. (August 24, 2017). "A Pardon for Arpaio Would Put Trump in Uncharted Territory". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
- Chafetz, Josh (August 26, 2017). "The problem with Joe Arpaio's pardon isn't the process. The problem is Joe Arpaio". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- Liptak, Adam (August 26, 2017). "Why Trump's Pardon of Arpaio Follows Law, Yet Challenges It". The New York Times. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
- "Analysis | Why Trump’s pardon of Joe Arpaio isn’t like most presidential pardons". Washington Post. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
- "Our View: Donald Trump just resurrected Joe Arpaio from irrelevance". azcentral. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- The Editorial Board (August 24, 2017). "The Perils of a Pardon for Joe Arpaio". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- "Joe Arpaio didn't deserve a pardon". USA TODAY. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- Board, The Times Editorial (August 23, 2017). "If Trump pardons Arpaio, he'll reward defiance of the courts, and that's wrong". Los Angeles Times. ISSN 0458-3035. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- Board, Editorial; Board, Editorial (August 21, 2017). "This would be a travesty of justice". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- Examiner, Washington. "Trump, once the law and order candidate, embraces lawless disorder with Arpaio pardon". Washington Examiner. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
- "An outrageous pardon and a hollow Congress - The Boston Globe". BostonGlobe.com. Retrieved 2017-08-28.
- "Editorial: Arpaio pardon was an affront to justice". SFGate. Retrieved 2017-08-28.
- Board, The Editorial (2017-08-27). "The Arpaio Pardon". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2017-08-28.
- Frum, David. "Trump Won't Back Down". The Atlantic. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
- Robb, Robert. "Robb: Facts don't matter to either side of the Arpaio pardon debate", Arizona Republic (August 26, 2017).
- Krugman, Paul. "Fascism, American Style." New York Times. August 28, 2017. August 28, 2017.
- "Elections Results Archive". Maricopa County Recorder's Office.
- "Cronkite-Eight Poll". Arizona State University PBS channel. November 20, 2007. Archived from the original on August 14, 2008.
- "Recall Petition Targets Sheriff Joe Arpaio". The Jawa Report. November 19, 2007.
- "Maricopa County Voters Support Thomas, Arpaio Over Recall Effort". Cronkite News Service. November 20, 2007.
- Carcamo, Cindy (May 30, 2013). "Recall effort against Arizona's Sheriff Joe Arpaio fails". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved May 31, 2013.
- Gennifer Furst, The Social History of Crime and Punishment in America: An Encyclopedia, Vol. 1 (ed. Wilbur R. Miller: SAGE, 2012), p. 66.
- Ray Stern, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, this time, reveals his home address himself, Phoenix New Times (April 29, 2008).
- Anderon, Mark (September 15, 2017). "Arpaio Bypasses Fake Media". American Free Press. Archived from the original on September 20, 2017.
|Sheriff of Maricopa County