John Morris (historian)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

John Robert Morris (June 8, 1913 – June 1, 1977) was an English historian who specialised in the study of the institutions of the Roman Empire and the history of Sub-Roman Britain. He is best known for his book The Age of Arthur (1973), in which he attempted to reconstruct the history of Britain and Ireland during the so-called "Dark Ages" following the Roman withdrawal, based on scattered archaeological and historical records. Much of his other work focused on Britain during this time.

Biography[edit]

Morris read Modern History at Jesus College, Oxford from 1932 to 1935, and served in the Army during the Second World War. After the war he held a Leon Fellowship at the University of London and a Junior Fellowship at the Warburg Institute. In 1948 he was appointed Lecturer in Ancient History at University College, London. He worked in India in 1968 and 1969 as a lecturer for the Indian University Grants Commission, before returning to UCL to become Senior Lecturer in Ancient History, a post he held until his death.

In 1952 Morris founded the historical journal Past & Present, which he edited until 1960, and remained chairman of the editorial board until 1972. He was one of the writers, along with A. H. M. Jones and J. R. Martindale, of The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire, a biographical dictionary of the years 284-641, the first volume of which was published in 1971. He also instigated the publication of a new edition of the Domesday Book, and edited the Arthurian Period Sources series. His last book was Londinium: London in the Roman Empire, published posthumously in 1982.[1]

Morris was a socialist and anti-war campaigner. He stood unsuccessfully for Parliament in 1935 as a Labour Party candidate, and was for a time secretary to the Labour MP George Strauss. He was a founder-member of the Committee of 100, an anti-war group founded by Bertrand Russell in 1960, and was later involved in the Institute for Workers' Control.

The Age of Arthur[edit]

The Age of Arthur attempted to build a picture of Britain during the period 350–650, when the theoretical King Arthur was supposed to have existed. The book is not, however, exclusively about Arthur, but on the entire history of Britain during the era. The book also includes detailed chapters on Brittany on the grounds that the Celtic population of Brittany after the migrations from "Greater Britain" meant that "Little Britain" (Brittany) was as much heir to Roman Britannia as were England, Wales and Scotland.

The book was heavily criticized in historical circles and Morris' academic reputation was severely damaged in the eyes of many of his peers as a result of its publication. David Dumville launched a famously scathing attack on the methodology adopted by Morris,[2] and while one of the most influential reviews of The Age of Arthur described it as "an outwardly impressive piece of scholarship", it went on to argue that this apparent scholarship "crumbles upon inspection into a tangled tissue of fact and fantasy which is both misleading and misguided".[3] Others, such as James Campbell, were more generous, but still considered that the Age of Arthur was so misleading and full of problems that it was really only of use to professional historians who could sort the interesting ideas from the flights of fantasy.[4]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Morris (John) Papers at University College London; "Dr J. R. Morris: Studies in ancient history (obituary)". The Times. 10 June 1977. p. 18. 
  2. ^ D. N. Dumville, "Sub-Roman Britain: History and Legend", History, 62 (1977), pp. 173-92
  3. ^ D. P. Kirby and J. E. C. Williams, "Review of The Age of Arthur", Studia Celtica, 10-11 (1975-6), pp. 454-86
  4. ^ J. Campbell, "The Age of Arthur", Studia Hibernica, 15 (1975), pp. 177-85