John Tzelepes Komnenos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

John Komnenos (Greek: Ἰωάννης Κομνηνὸς, translit. Iōannēs Komnēnos), later surnamed Tzelepes (Τζελέπης, Tzelepēs), was the son of the sebastokrator Isaac Komnenos. As a young man he followed his father during his exile and wanderings across Asia Minor and the Levant, when for a short time he was married to a daughter of Leo I, ruler of Armenian Cilicia. After the reconciliation between his father and his uncle, Emperor John II Komnenos, in 1138, he returned to the Byzantine court, but defected in the next year to the Danishmendid Turks during a siege of Neocaesarea. From there he moved to the court of the Sultan of Rum, one of whose daughters he married. According to later, and likely invented, tradition, the Ottoman dynasty hailed from one of his offspring.

Life[edit]

John was born in c. 1112 to the sebastokrator Isaac Komnenos, a younger son of Emperor Alexios I Komnenos (r. 1081–1118), and his wife Irene.[1] Little is known about his mother, who was probably of Russian descent.[2]

Exile and wanderings[edit]

Emperor John II Komnenos, John's uncle (mosaic from the Hagia Sophia)

Relations between Isaac and his brother, John II Komnenos (r. 1118–1143) were cordial at first, but began to deteriorate, so that by 1130 they had become estranged. The reasons for this are left unexplained by the sources; Niketas Choniates and John Kinnamos simply report that Isaac had set his sight on the throne.[3][4] In 1130, Isaac became involved in a conspiracy against John at a time when the latter was away from Constantinople, campaigning against the Seljuk Turks of the Sultanate of Rum. The conspiracy was uncovered, but Isaac and his two sons managed to flee Constantinople and find refuge at the court of the Danishmendid emir Gümüshtigin Ghazi (r. 1104–1134) at Melitene.[5] John accompanied his father during his subsequent six-year exile, during which time they traversed most of Asia Minor and the Levant, as Isaac tried to rally the region's rulers to his cause against his brother.[4][6]

From Melitene, they went to Trebizond, whose governor, Constantine Gabras, had broken away from Byzantium in 1126 and was ruling the area of Chaldia as an independent prince,[7] and then to Armenian Cilicia, where its lord, Leo I, received them well: John even married one of Leo's daughters, and received the cities of Mopsuestia and Adana as her dowry. After a short while, however, they fell out with Leo, and were forced to seek shelter with the Sultan of Rum, Mesud I (r. 1116–1156), abandoning their possessions in Cilicia.[8]

Isaac persisted in his efforts to form a coalition against his brother, but they proved fruitless, while John II's position continued to improve. The emperor's military successes, particularly following his Syrian campaign in 1137–1138 that led to the submission of the Principality of Antioch to the empire, enhanced his standing with the Byzantine aristocracy, officialdom, and the common people. As a result, Isaac's supporters in the empire began to desert his cause.[9] Thus Isaac was forced to seek reconciliation with his brother: along with John, Isaac met his brother during the imperial army's return from Antioch in spring 1138. The emperor readily forgave them and brought them to Constantinople.[10]

Defection and aftermath[edit]

In 1139, John accompanied the emperor on his campaign against Gümüshtigin's son and successor Melik Mehmed. The Byzantine army advanced to Mehmed's residence at Neocaesarea and laid siege to it.[11] During a confrontation between the two armies, an incident led to the defection of John: seeing a distinguished Latin knight on foot, the emperor ordered John to give him his own, pure-blood Arab stallion. This demand enraged the prideful John, who refused to do so and challenged the Latin knight to a duel for the horse. Seeing his uncle frowning at his reaction, he gave up the horse, but immediately seized another horse, pointed his arms to the rear, and galloped to the Turkish camp.[12] He was well received by Mehmed, who knew him from his previous exile, and readily divulged the information he was privy to about the weaknesses of the Byzantine army; this act saved Neocaesarea from falling, as the emperor was left with no choice but to withdraw.[13]

From Neocaesarea, John moved to the court of the Sultan Mesud I. There he converted to Islam and married one of the Sultan's daughters, whose name according to the 16th-century historian Pseudo-Sphrantzes was Kamero (Καμερώ).[12] His subsequent life is obscure: neither the date of his death or any activities at the court of Iconium are known.[14] He received many lands and wealth, and was highly respected by thre Turks for his erudition and his command of Arabic.[15][16] His wife may have been the woman who led the defence of the Seljuq capital Konya against the attacks of John's cousin, Emperor Manuel I Komnenos (r. 1143–1180). John was likely dead by that time.[15][16]

According to Pseudo-Sphrantzes, later tradition held that John assumed the name Tzelepes—a Greek rendering of the Turkish honorific Çelebi, a term indicating noble birth, a "lord" or "gentleman"[17]—but Pseudo-Sphrantzes doubts this information and suggests that that Tzelepes was another person entirely.[18] According to this later tradition, John and his Seljuq wife had a son, Suleyman Shah, who was supposedly the father of Ertuğrul, the forefather of the Ottoman dynasty.[15] This tradition was known to Mehmed II, the conqueror of Constantinople, who used it to claim the legitimate inheritance of Byzantium as a descendant of the Komnenoi through John, but it is most likely fictitious.[15][19] As Konstantinos Varzos points out, this descent is unlikely from a purely chronological distance of the persons involved. Most likely, it is an invented tradition used as a legitimizing device by Mehmed II, similar to the stories of Ottoman descent from the Kayı tribe. If there is any kernel of truth to it, it may indicate a matrilineal descent from John for Suleyman Shah, possibly from a grand-daughter of John.[20]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Varzos 1984, pp. 254, 480.
  2. ^ Jurewicz 1970, pp. 36–37.
  3. ^ Varzos 1984, p. 239.
  4. ^ a b Magdalino 1993, p. 193.
  5. ^ Varzos 1984, pp. 239, 480.
  6. ^ Varzos 1984, pp. 240–241.
  7. ^ Varzos 1984, pp. 239–241, 480.
  8. ^ Varzos 1984, p. 241, 480.
  9. ^ Varzos 1984, p. 243.
  10. ^ Varzos 1984, pp. 243–244, 481.
  11. ^ Varzos 1984, pp. 481–482.
  12. ^ a b Varzos 1984, p. 482.
  13. ^ Varzos 1984, pp. 482–483.
  14. ^ Varzos 1984, p. 485.
  15. ^ a b c d Jurewicz 1970, p. 36.
  16. ^ a b Varzos 1984, p. 483.
  17. ^ Jurewicz 1970, p. 36 (note 55).
  18. ^ Jurewicz 1970, pp. 35–36.
  19. ^ Varzos 1984, p. 484.
  20. ^ Varzos 1984, pp. 484–485 (note 27).

Sources[edit]

  • Jurewicz, Oktawiusz (1970). Andronikos I. Komnenos (in German). Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert. OCLC 567685925.
  • Magdalino, Paul (1993). The Empire of Manuel I Komnenos, 1143–1180. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-52653-1.
  • Varzos, Konstantinos (1984). Η Γενεαλογία των Κομνηνών [The Genealogy of the Komnenoi] (PDF) (in Greek). A. Thessaloniki: Centre for Byzantine Studies, University of Thessaloniki. OCLC 834784634.