Joint Industrial Council
A Joint Industrial Council (JIC) or National Joint Industrial Council (NJIC), known as a Whitley Council in some fields, especially white-collar and government, is a statutory council of employers and trade unions established in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. It is a workplace partnership institution that serves for a forum of consultation between employees and employers. Councils were established from 1919. They typically worked to determine wage rates, terms and conditions in a specific industry. There were dozens of JICs, one for each industry. Most JICs were established between the 1920s and the 1940s. The larger JICs also had regional councils throughout the country and some industries had separate JICs for England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
During World War I, in 1917, John Henry Whitley was appointed to chair a committee, which soon produced a Report on the Relations of Employers and Employees in the wake of the establishment of the Shop Stewards Movement and the widespread protest action against dilution. The smooth running of industry was vital to the war effort so maintaining good industrial relations was a priority.
He proposed a system of regular formal consultative meetings between workers and employers, known to this day as "Whitley Councils". These would be empowered to cover any issue related to pay and conditions of service, and to take matters through to arbitration if necessary. This was a strong model which was to influence industrial relations in Canada, Australia and elsewhere.
The intention was to establish Whitley councils in the private sector, in particular in those industries most affected by the strike wave - to offset the demand for 'Workers' control' - a demand which was rapidly gaining ground after the Russian revolution.
However, the councils failed to gain ground in coal, cotton, engineering and other heavy industries, but succeeded only in the sphere of government employment where they remain a major feature of public sector industrial relations to this day.
The Royal Institute of Public Administration commissioned Henry Parris, then of Durham University, to write a history of Whitleyism, published in 1973, to mark the 50th anniversary of the foundation of the National Whitley Council.
Whitley Councils comprise employee representatives, often referred to as the "Staff Side" and employer representatives, also known as the "Official Side".
Whitley Councils usually have a formally agreed constitution. This typically includes:
- General objectives and functions - generally to "seek co-operation and agreement" on any matters appropriate to the level of jurisdiction of the committee, including, for example, pay, conditions of service, training, equality of opportunity, staff ideas, office accommodation, machinery, organisation, processes, procedures and policies.
- Membership - the composition of each side may be defined and limited in number, though it is normal that each side is responsible for deciding its membership. Often, either side may co-opt members to speak on specific areas of specialism.
- Officers - the senior executive of the official side is usually the chair and a representative of the staff side nominated as vice-chair. Each side may have a secretary who may or may not be a full member of the council. In the UK, Whitley Councils at government departmental level may be chaired by the Permanent Secretary.
- Committees - the main committee may delegate responsibility to sub-committees e.g. to cover matters relating to pay and conditions of service, health and safety, etc.
- Decisions - sometimes a constitution will contain an explicit directive that decisions taken will be executed within a reasonable time frame.
- Disputes - sometimes the informal and formal stages of dispute resolution are specified.
- Meetings - frequency, location, agenda, quorum etc.
- Minutes - covering responsibility for drafting, agreeing, distributing and publishing minutes and the time scales for these.
- Finance and Facilities - typically each side is responsible for its own expenses. The employer normally provides reasonable paid time to prepare for and attend meetings.
- Amendment - the manner in which amendments to the constitution can be made.
Whitley Councils may be organised in a hierarchical manner, reflecting the structure of the employing organisation. For example, within the UK civil service, Whitley councils exist at local, workplace level, then at departmental level and ultimately at national level. In other institutions a geographic hierarchy (local, area, regional, national) may be followed.
In 1979 there were eight functional councils in the National Health Service covering all NHS staff, except doctors and dentists, and a few other NHS workers who negotiated directly with the health departments.
- Macrae-Gibson, J. H. (1922). "The Whitley system in the civil service". Fabian Society.
- Frankel, S. J. (1956). "Staff Relations in the Canadian Federal Public Service: Experience with Joint Consultation". The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science. 22 (4): 509–522. doi:10.2307/138711.
- "First Whitley Council". The Argus (Melbourne, Vic. : 1848-1954). 12 September 1919. p. 6.
- "The Lloyd George Papers - Whitley Report and Civil Service LG/F/186/2/4". London: Parliamentary Archive. 1916–1922.
- Parris, Henry. "Staff Relations in the Civil Service: Fifty Years of Whitleyism". George Allen & Unwin, 1973,
- Royal Commission on the NHS Chapter 12. HMSO. July 1979. ISBN 0101761503. Retrieved 19 May 2015.
- "MoD Personnel Manual, Annex B 1-3: Whitley Council Constitutions" (PDF). Ministry of Defence. Retrieved 30 September 2010.
- "Constitution for Crown Prosecution Service - Area Whitley Council". Crown Prosecution Service. Retrieved 30 September 2010.
- Miller, Earl Joyce (1924). Workmen's representation in industrial government. University of Illinois studies in the social sciences; v. 10, no. 3-4. pp. 414–28.
- Ewing, Keith D. (1998). The State and Industrial Relations: 'Collective Laissez-Faire' Revisited. 5 Historical Studies in Industrial Relations 1. p. 31.