User talk:Noles1984

; Archives
	March 2006 – May 2006; May 2006 – August 2006; ; ; ;

CSS Tallahassee

Sorry for the delay! I've added it to the ship box-- a quick list of these is on my to-do page, which will let you be one click away from editing them.... plange 21:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1690/pilgrims userbox

Your user box says: "Noles1984 descendants were Pilgrims landing in Ipswich in 1690" Don't you mean ancestors? Or are you like 350 years old? :) Cburnett 23:22, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chalk Maple

Are you sure that's a Chalk Maple? IMO it looks more like a Red Maple (which also grows in that part of Florida). There are some pictures of the leaves here, and most of them look different from your picture. I may be wrong however - some of them do look rather similar to yours. --Schzmo 19:01, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if the bark looks like that, you probably are right. Do you know the flower color? If they're red, it's a Red Maple; if they're green/yellow, then it most likely is a Chalk Maple. --Schzmo 19:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was just about to make the same note! The pic is unfortunately Red Maple, not Chalk Maple (which is very closely related to, and barely distinguishable from, Sugar Maple). As a PS - "Image compressed by 60% to save Wikipedia space" - this isn't necessary, space is not a problem, it is better to upload the full resolution. - MPF 21:33, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up ... saw the notes on Schzmo's talk page; on comparing the leaf shape with other photos, the character to look for is not how pointed the leaf is (this is variable), but how many serrations there are on the sides of the lobes; Chalk Maple (as in the Duke.edu pic) has just one or two teeth on the side, whereas Red Maple, and your scan, shows several small teeth. Sorry, it is definitely Red Maple! - MPF 21:39, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I reckon it is worth re-uploading the pic with a new name, as we don't have a decent Red Maple leaf pic (see commons:Acer rubrum, which is the best place to put pics so they can be used on all the other wikipedias as well) - MPF 21:48, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On pic size - generally, people with dial-up etc will only look at the thumbnails in the page; the full-size pic can be a megabyte or five without affecting this, so large image files aren't a problem (that's one of the nice things about wikipedia!) - MPF 22:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! - it does; if you click on a pic, unless the pic is small, you'll find the pic on the image description page is still reduced, with a clickable line under the pic which says "Download high resolution version (2848x2136, 1537 KB)" (or whatever the full size of the pic is). You can set yourself what size image the image description page shows; go to "my preferences" (link next to your talk page link), go to "Files", and there you'll be offered a drop-down box "Limit images on image description pages to:", with the default setting at 800×600px, but you can set it as low as 320×240px if you want to; this will allow you to see pics at a much lower resolution and kilobytage. Hope this helps! - MPF 20:59, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're the expert on Florida history...

...is there anything you'd change about Cascades Park (Tallahassee)? —Keenan Pepper 05:18, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good article. I added two images a postcard and a drawing for interest OK?... surely there needs to be an image for the upcoming rebirth. I also added one single line saying: "The Florida State Capital now stands where this waterfall and pond once were." As for being an expert? I'm really only interested in Leon Co. and surounding counties and towns. I just get curious about things and then look for photos at the Florida Photographic Collection then Google that subject or information within the description to see if I can get more. There's so much more to do. What else have you seen that I've created? I'd be interested. "Go Noles!" -Chuck, Noles1984 14:33, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the images. I asked my sister to take some photos with her digital camera, which should complement the historical images nicely. And you're definitely the expert; your contributions are ridiculously extensive, so don't even argue. =P —Keenan Pepper 15:24, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the quick image deletion

I presume you just re-uploaded it. Assuming the new information you provided is OK, there's no more problem. Non-comercial only images have been not allowed here for more than a year; it's more than time for us to stamp on them quickly... JesseW, the juggling janitor 19:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Newport, Florida

I'll tackle the Newport, Florida article today. From what I've seen, 3 seperate articles can come from this. Noles1984 12:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yay, thanks for your help. -- Beland 05:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Surficial Aquifer.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Surficial Aquifer.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:14, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tallahassee

I didn't copy it, I moved it. The previous location that it appeared at was in the main article space, which isn't the right place for something that's a sandbox. So I moved it to the Talk: namespace, but if you prefer, you can make this sort of stuff a subpage in your user namespace instead. --Michael Snow 16:26, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Goodall Environmental Middle School

Hello! You have restored the National Geographic video cover with Jane Goodall's picture on it i the article on Jane Goodall Environmental Middle School. Unfortunately this is directly against the fair use policy (see counterexaple # 9). Also, the copyright tag leaves no room for interpretation, saying "It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of videotape covers to illustrate the videotape in question qualifies as fair use". I will remove the image again. Please don't put it back. Dr Zak 16:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures of Doak Campbell Stadium

Hello, some time ago you upladed a couple of images of Doak Campbell Stadium from the Seminoles website. I have orphaned those as any local fan could go and take pictures of the stadium interior at a game. The {{promophoto}} tag specifically says that such pictures are only suitable "where the image is unrepeatable". Regards Dr Zak 17:09, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to new WikiProject

Sorry to disturb, but am wishing to take a moment of your time for something I hope will be of interest. I'd like to invite you to join a new WikiProject I've started, WikiProject National Register of Historic Places. Should you feel so inclined, please feel free to join. And spread the word to any other interested parties. :) -Ebyabe 19:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Doak Campbell Stadium.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Doak Campbell Stadium.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ccwaters 19:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Star Metro01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Star Metro01.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 22:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Star Metro01.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Star Metro01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Chowbok ☠ 16:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commonwealth Cup (Virginia)

I nominated this article for deletion not because the content was bad, but because it was redundant to the Commonwealth Cup page. I moved a bit of the information over there, but enately they are the same. Jazznutuva 10:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nominatng was a good move. I incorporated the style of info box or table found on previous Commonwealth page which I think looks cleaner, just my opinion. Adjusted the title color to white since it was somewhat hidden in the grey (black text). Moved the photo up.

Question do you know how the template for UVA (Commonwealth Cup) and Jefferson-Eppes Trophy article/page bottom) is done. That's a mystery and I'd like to create one for FSU. Thanks. Noles1984 16:12, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Sure... it took me a while to figure this out too... I actually created the UVA one... follow this link {{University of Virginia}}... to add this template to the page you just simply add {{University of Virginia}} to the bottom of the page but it's only a template. If you have any other questions check out Help:Template or write me back... I'll gone for a few days, but I'll answer as soon as I get back. Jazznutuva 22:21, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Red Hills Parkway

The only information I have handy is that it's supposed to be a toll road between 319 in Bradfordville and 98 in Newport, it was in an article in the local paper early this year. They'd be a lot better off spending the money to, oh I dunno, widen 319 perhaps? - Aerobird 15:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note

If you set your e-mail address, I will e-mail you. Or, if you e-mail me, I will respond by e-mail. Johntex\^talk 23:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Star Metro01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Star Metro01.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 22:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps so, but there's no reason to use a fair-use screenshot of a bus when anybody could just take a photo of it and release it under a free license. —Chowbok ☠ 22:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No fair use image should be used if it could be replaced by a free one. —Chowbok ☠ 23:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Breadbox buses

Yeah, I'm pretty sure the bus in this pic: [1] is what I'm thinking of. - Aerobird 00:32, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

native merge

Cool - thanks for that. I was beginning to wonder if anybody else was going to notice.....cheers Cas Liber 07:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==Source of scanned material==

I have tagged Image:Longleaf Pine01.jpg as having no source listed. You indicated that you had scanned the image, but you do not say where you scanned it from. Scanning an image does not give you any copyright, and the copyright of the original image still applies. -- Donald Albury 03:28, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leon County roads

Well I've been rather wrapped up in WP:AIR activity lately, but I'll see what I can do. :-) - Aerobird ^{Target locked - Fox One!} 22:39, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did some work, whaddya think? Unfortunatly there's no .SVG yet for Florida State Road 366. - Aerobird ^{Target locked - Fox One!} 23:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you liked it. :-) Yeah, the B-70 shouldn't have been cancelled (insert not-at-all-NPOV rant about MacNamara here). As for the Dragonfly, it's included as part of the Cessna T-37 article. - Aerobird ^{Target locked - Fox One!} 14:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Commonwealth Cup Va.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Commonwealth Cup Va.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New NRHP Collaboration Division

Hey, saw you were a participant in the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject. I thought I would let you know that there is a new Collaboration Division up for the project. The goal of the division is to select an article or articles for improvement to Good article standard or higher. There is a simple nomination process, which you can check out on the division subpage, to make sure each candidate for collaboration has enough interested editors. This is a good way to get a lot of articles to a quality status quickly. Please consider participating. More details can be seen at the division subpage. IvoShandor 11:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Doak_Campbell_Stadium_Diagram.png

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Doak_Campbell_Stadium_Diagram.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz Saalfeld (Talk) 15:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wawasee

I just wanted to thank you for your fine work on Lake Wawasee history. I am a relative new comer to the Lake. I found it 3 years ago after buying a pontoon boat. Though I can't afford to live on the lake I enjoy the history. I knew it had a rich history but never knew the details until I read the article. Thank you again! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.93.44.78 (talk) 12:09, 12 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Battle Natural Bridge Flag.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Battle Natural Bridge Flag.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:53, 19 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 00:53, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Florida Photographic Collection (FPC) images

Here's what happended: The FPC used a dubious copyright notice that made it sound like the FPC owned the copyright to the image. They don't necessarily. It was discussed here:Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_May_6#Template:Flphoto. I unfortunately had to agree with the reasoning to delete all of the images. I lost about 50 images. Royalbroil 14:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:BK Rootbeer.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:BK Rootbeer.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 20:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Calusa02.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Calusa02.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Florida State Combo Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Florida State Combo Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Arvah Hopkins01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Arvah Hopkins01.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Battle Natural Bridge Flag.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Battle Natural Bridge Flag.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:56, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Bannerman Plantation 1976 rc14084.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bannerman Plantation 1976 rc14084.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Bannerman Plantation 1947 rc18299.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bannerman Plantation 1947 rc18299.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bethlehem Missionary Baptist Church rc04430.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bethlehem Missionary Baptist Church rc04430.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:37, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Chaires High School2 rc05541.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Chaires High School2 rc05541.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Carrabelle Tallahassee Georgia Railroad rc12343.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carrabelle Tallahassee Georgia Railroad rc12343.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:56, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Carrabelle Tallahassee Georgia Railroad c00012.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carrabelle Tallahassee Georgia Railroad c00012.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:56, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Carrabelle Tallahassee Georgia Railroad 1894 rc07203.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carrabelle Tallahassee Georgia Railroad 1894 rc07203.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:56, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Carrabele Tallahassee Georgia Railroad n038653.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carrabele Tallahassee Georgia Railroad n038653.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dale Mabry Field pr13624.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dale Mabry Field pr13624.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:43, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dale Mabry Field pr13614.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dale Mabry Field pr13614.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:43, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dale Mabry Field n044871.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dale Mabry Field n044871.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:43, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]