Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial
|Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial|
|Narrated by||Jay O. Sanders|
|Country of origin||United States|
|Original language(s)||English (U.S.)|
|Running time||1 hour, 53 minutes|
|Production company(s)||Vulcan Productions
Big Table Film Company
|Distributor||PBS Distribution for the science show NOVA|
Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial is a documentary on the case of Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District—which concentrated on the question of whether or not intelligent design could be viewed as science and taught in school science class. It first aired on PBS stations nationwide, on November 13, 2007, with many reruns, and features interviews with the judge, witnesses, and lawyers as well as re-enacted scenes using the official transcript of the trial.
Judgment Day was produced by WGBH's NOVA and Vulcan Productions in association with the Big Table Film Company. The senior executive producer was Paula S. Apsell, the executive producer was Richard Hutton, and the producers were Joseph McMaster, Gary Johnstone, and Vanessa Tovell. The senior producer was Susanne Simpson. Johnstone and McMaster served as directors, and McMaster was the writer.
In April 2008 the documentary won a Peabody Award. It won the 2008 Science Journalism Award presented by the American Association for the Advancement of Science to honor excellence in science reporting.
When the school board in Dover, Pennsylvania votes to require science teachers to read a statement touting intelligent design as a scientific alternative to Darwin's Theory of Evolution parents sue the district, leading to a trial in which the judge must decide if intelligent design is merely a new name for creationism, already banned in public schools as being religious in nature.
The documentary was received positively by many scientific organizations. It was praised by Nature, and described as accurate by the National Center for Science Education. Variety magazine also gave the documentary a positive review, and said it was one of the year's most important television projects, that "should be shown not just in every U.S. high school but in houses of worship as well."
In contrast, creationists and intelligent design supporters have criticized the documentary. The Discovery Institute produced a website critical of the broadcast, while Answers in Genesis argued the evidence for evolution presented by scientists in Judgment Day was fallacious. The Institute for Creation Research (ICR) also claimed the film was not balanced.
- Dean, Cornelia (11 November 2007). "Battlefield Report From the Evolution War". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-11-17.
- Lowry, Brian (2007-11-12). "Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial". Recently Reviewed. Variety. Retrieved 2008-07-20.
- 67th Annual Peabody Awards, May 2008.
- "AAAS Announces Winners of the 2008 AAAS Science Journalism Awards". American Association for the Advancement of Science. November 12, 2008. Retrieved 2008-04-06.
- "Television: Dover trial documentary screens". Nature. 8 November 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-17.
- "Judgment Day Accurate, NCSE Reports". National Center for Science Education. 13 November 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-17.
- "Judgment Day praised in Nature". National Center for Science Education. 2007-11-08. Retrieved 2008-07-20.
- "Darwin's Failed Predictions". JudgingPBS.com. Discovery Institute. Retrieved 2008-07-20.
- PBS, Darwin and Dover: an Interview with Phillip Johnson, Intelligent Design the Future podcast, November 12, 2007
- Looy, Mark (2007-11-14). "Is it over after Dover?". Answers in Genesis. Retrieved 2008-07-20.
- David A. DeWitt, PhD (2007-11-16). "Biased Judgment: Comments on NOVA TV's Judgment Day and its analysis of the Dover ID Trial". Answers in Genesis. Retrieved 2008-07-20.
- Christine Dao. "PBS' "Judgment Day" Is a Misjudgment". Institute for Creation Research. Retrieved 2008-07-20.
- "Topic too hot for WKNO: Show on intelligent design didn't air here". Commercial Appeal. 15 November 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-17.