Jurisprudence of concepts
||This article may be confusing or unclear to readers. (March 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
||This article needs attention from an expert in Law. (March 2015)|
The jurisprudence of concepts was the first sub-school of legal positivism, according to which, the written law must reflect concepts, when interpreted. Its main representatives were Ihering, Savigny and Puchta.
This school was, thus, the preceding trigger of the idea that law comes from a dogmatic source, imposition from man over man and not a natural consequence of other sciences or of metaphysical faith.
Among the main characters of the jurisprudence of concepts are:
- formalism, search of rights in written law
- search for justifying specific norm with basis from more generic ones.
So, according to this school, law should have prevailing sources based upon the legislative process, although needing to be proven by more inclusive ideas of a social sense.
- Jurisprudence of values
- Jurisprudence of interests
- Philosophy of law
- Legal positivism
- Legal naturalism
- Costa, Alexandre Araújo. "A Jurisprudência dos Conceitos". Arcos. Retrieved 17 December 2011.
- Pepino, Elsa Maria Lopes Ferreira; Graviorno, Gracimeri, Vieira Soeiro de Castro; Filgueira, Sofia Varejão. "A importância da Jurisprudência dos Conceitos para a Metodologia Jurídica" (PDF). Revista Depoimentos, da Faculdade de Direito de Vitória. Retrieved 17 December 2011.
- that means that the interpretation of the words stated in the law must be guided by the scientific concepts that these words represent.
- Rocha, Sérgio André (2009). "Evolução Histórica da Teoria Hermenêutica - do Formalismo do Século XVIII ao Pós-Positivismo". Retrieved 25 January 2012.
|This law-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|