From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Reproduction of a koseki certificate printout

A koseki (戸籍) or family register[1][2] is a Japanese family registry; a registry of all matters. Japanese law requires all Japanese households (known as "ie") to report births, acknowledgements of paternity, adoptions, disruptions of adoptions, deaths, marriages and divorces of Japanese citizens to their local authority, which compiles such records encompassing all Japanese citizens within their jurisdiction. Marriages, adoptions and acknowledgements of paternity become legally effective only when such events are recorded in the koseki. Births and deaths become legally effective as they happen, but such events must be filed by family members.


There are two main types of koseki: the Comprehensive Koseki (戸籍謄本, koseki tōhon) and Selected Koseki (戸籍抄本, koseki shōhon). The Comprehensive Koseki is a record of all family members, with dates of deaths and births, marriages, etc. The Selected Koseki is the information for only one individual family member, with parents’ names, date and place of birth, and sex. A third, less commonly-used document is the Extended Koseki (戸籍の附票, koseki no fuhyō), supplementary family member attachment, such as relatives not part of the nuclear family who also reside in the home.[3][4]

A typical koseki has one page for the household's parents and their first two children: additional children are recorded on additional pages. Any changes to this information have to be sealed by an official registrar.

The following items are recorded in the koseki. (Law of Family Register, (戸籍法, kosekihō), article 13.)

  • family name and given name
  • date of birth
  • date of records and causes (marriage, death, adoption, etc.)
  • names of the father and the mother and the relation to them
  • name changes, but not the original name
  • if adopted, names of the adoptive father and mother
  • if married, whether the person is a husband or a wife
  • if transferred from another koseki, the former koseki
  • registered domicile (honseki-chi)


Introduced in the 6th century, the original population census in Japan was called the kōgo no nenjaku (庚午年籍) or the kōin no nenjaku (庚寅年籍). This census was introduced under the ritsuryō system of governance.[5] During the Bakufu, there were four major forms of population registration: the ninbetsuchō (人別帳) (Registry of Human Categories), the shūmon jinbetsu aratamechō (宗門人別改帳) (Religious Inquisition Registry) also called the shūmon aratamechō, the gonin gumichō (五人組帳) (Five Household Registry) and the kakochō (過去帳) (Death Registry). The shūmon jinbetsu aratamechō was created around 1670 and lasted almost 200 years. It combined social and religious registration, and data was renewed annually.[6] Several categories of outcasts were not registered at all under this system, or were registered in specific registers, for instance the burakumin.[7] The modern koseki, encompassing all of Japan's citizenry, appeared in 1872, immediately following the Meiji Restoration. This was the first time in history that all Japanese people were required to have family names as well as given names. Although all previous social categories were abolished and almost all Japanese people were recorded as heimin (commoners), some minorities became labelled as "new commoner" or "original eta" (shinheimin or motoeta),[7] and discrimination went on. Problems also happened at the edge of the national territory, for instance in the Ogasawara Islands.[7]

During the course of Japanese Empire, a number of reforms were carried out after 1910 to eliminate double standards in the koseki system. In general, though, residents of the Empire's colonies held external registries (gaichi koseki) (based on the preexisting Hoju) and Japanese held domestic registries (naichi koseki).[7]

In 2003, the "GID Law" was enacted, enabling people with "gender identity disorder" (GID) or gender dysphoria to change their gender on their koseki provided they meet certain conditions. Persons diagnosed with GID must seek an official diagnosis with letters of support from two independent psychiatrists to change their koseki gender.[8]

Privacy concerns[edit]

Information provided in koseki is detailed and sensitive and makes discrimination possible against such groups as burakumin or illegitimate children and unwed mothers, for example. As the burakumin liberation movement gained strength in postwar Japan some changes were made to family registries. In 1974 a notice that prohibited employers from asking prospective employees to show their family registry was released by the Ministry of Health and Welfare. In 1975 one's lineage name was deleted and in 1976 access to family registries was restricted. As of April 2007, anyone interested was eligible to get a copy of someone else's koseki. However, on May 1, 2008, a new law was implemented to limit the persons eligible for a copy to the persons whose names are recorded in a given koseki and those who need such a copy to exercise their due rights (debt collectors, executors of wills).[9][10] Anyone who is listed on a koseki, even if their name has been crossed off by reason of divorce and even if they are not a Japanese citizen, is eligible to get a copy of that koseki.[9] One can obtain a copy in person or by mail. Lawyers can also obtain copies of any koseki if a person listed is involved in legal proceedings.[11]


Only Japanese citizens have a Koseki.[12] If one parent is Japanese, then the child is eligible for Japanese citizenship, hence a Japanese passport. So, the Koseki doubles as a certificate of citizenship. Non-Japanese may be noted where required, such as being the spouse of a Japanese citizen[4] or the parent of a Japanese offspring; however, they are not listed in the same fashion as Japanese spouses or parents.[13]

Note that the koseki system is different from the jūminhyō residency registration, which holds current address information.

Other criticisms[edit]

The koseki simultaneously fills the function of birth certificates, death certificates, marriage licenses, and the census in other countries. It is based on family rather than each individual. For married couples, only one family name may appear on the koseki, which means that one person has to abandon his or her family name when he or she marries. Usually it is the woman.[7] On December 15, 2015, the Nikkei Asian Review reported that Japan's Supreme Court upheld a legal provision forcing married couples to use the same surname. Plaintiffs had argued that the legal provision amounts to "de facto discrimination against women."

Another concern is where children are not registered on the Koseki. The onus is on the parents to register the child however there have been cases where this has not happened. [14]

Another complaint, notably raised by Debito Arudou, is that a non-Japanese parent cannot be registered on the same koseki that holds their children's information. Prima facie, the only parental relationship established by the koseki is that with the Japanese parent - enabling them full control over the children within Japan, even where they are not the custodial parent in the other parent's jurisdiction.[15]

Imperial family[edit]

Cover of the Register of Imperial Lineage

Members of the Imperial Household of Japan are registered not in a koseki but in a Register of Imperial Lineage (皇統譜, kotofu) instead, according to Article 26 of the Imperial House Law.[16]

Family registries in other nations[edit]

A similar registration system exists within the public administration structures of all East Asian states influenced by the ancient Chinese system of government. The local pronunciations of the name of the household register varies, but all are derived from the same Chinese characters as that for koseki (in traditional Chinese: 戶籍). These states include People's Republic of China (hukou), Republic of China (Taiwan) (hukou), Vietnam (Hộ khẩu), and North Korea (hoju, hojeok, hojok). In South Korea, the hoju system was abolished in 2008.


In September 2010, the Japanese government completed research into 230,000 "missing" persons age 100 years old or more. Some journalists claimed koseki is an antiquated system that enabled younger family members to receive the pensions of deceased elderly relatives.[17][18]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ "戸籍法" [Family Register Act]. Act No. 224 of December 22, 1947.
  2. ^ "Japan's Family Registry System". U.S. Embassy and Consulate in Japan. Retrieved February 9, 2021.
  3. ^ "List of Public Certificates" (PDF). Numazu City Council. Retrieved 2021-07-01.
  4. ^ a b Fujiwara City Council. 戸籍の附票の写し [Copy of the Koseki Family Register Supplement]. Retrieved July 1, 2021
  5. ^ Chapman, D. (2008), Sealing Japanese identity, Critical Asian Studies, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 423 - 443.
  6. ^ Smith, Thomas (1977), Nakahara: Family Farming and Population in a Japanese Village, 1717-1830, Stanford University Press, pp. 15–16, ISBN 9780804766692
  7. ^ a b c d e David Chapman, Geographies of Self and Other: Mapping Japan through the Koseki, in The Asia-Pacific Journal Vol 9, Issue 29 No 2, July 18, 2011
  8. ^ Abe, Teruo "Gender identity disorder", Juntendo Medical Journal, Vol. 52, No. 1 (20060331) p. 55–61
  9. ^ a b Law on Family Registry, Article 10, 戸籍法第10条
  10. ^ Law on Family Registry, Article 10-2, 戸籍法第10条の2
  11. ^ Law on Family Registry, Article 10-2 Paragraph 3, 戸籍法第10条の2第3項
  12. ^ "Japanese Passport Application/Renewal". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. Retrieved 2020-08-28.
  13. ^ "THE JUUMINHYOU MONDAI" Archived 2013-05-28 at the Wayback Machine "as a foreigner, you are put down on your spouse's koseki not as a married couple, under the heading "wife" or "husband" like any Japanese, but as a "remark" (bikou, in kanji: 備考) on the form."
  14. ^ Ninomiya, Shūhei (2018-02-18). "Japan's Archaic Civil Code and the Plight of the Unregistered". Retrieved 2021-07-01.
  15. ^ Arudō, Debito, 1965- (2015). Embedded racism : Japan's visible minorities and racial discrimination. Lanham. ISBN 978-1-4985-1390-6. OCLC 921240377.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  16. ^ "The Imperial House Law".
  17. ^ The Independent
  18. ^ Washington Post

External links[edit]