Kripke–Platek set theory with urelements
This article needs attention from an expert in logic, philosophy or mathematics.(March 2011)
The Kripke–Platek set theory with urelements (KPU) is an axiom system for set theory with urelements, based on the traditional (urelement-free) Kripke–Platek set theory. It is considerably weaker than the (relatively) familiar system ZFU. The purpose of allowing urelements is to allow large or high-complexity objects (such as the set of all reals) to be included in the theory's transitive models without disrupting the usual well-ordering and recursion-theoretic properties of the constructible universe; KP is so weak that this is hard to do by traditional means.
The usual way of stating the axioms presumes a two sorted first order language with a single binary relation symbol . Letters of the sort designate urelements, of which there may be none, whereas letters of the sort designate sets. The letters may denote both sets and urelements.
The letters for sets may appear on both sides of , while those for urelements may only appear on the left, i.e. the following are examples of valid expressions: , .
The statement of the axioms also requires reference to a certain collection of formulae called -formulae. The collection consists of those formulae that can be built using the constants, , , , , and bounded quantification. That is quantification of the form or where is given set.
The axioms of KPU are the universal closures of the following formulae:
- Foundation: This is an axiom schema where for every formula we have .
- Δ0-Separation: This is again an axiom schema, where for every -formula we have the following .
- -Collection: This is also an axiom schema, for every -formula we have .
- Set Existence:
Technically these are axioms that describe the partition of objects into sets and urelements.
- Barwise, Jon (1975), Admissible Sets and Structures, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 3-540-07451-1.
- Gostanian, Richard (1980), "Constructible Models of Subsystems of ZF", Journal of Symbolic Logic, 45: 237–250, doi:10.2307/2273185, JSTOR 2273185.