Laziness

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For the computer science concept, see Lazy evaluation.

Laziness (also called indolence) is a disinclination to activity or exertion despite having the ability to act or exert oneself. It is often used as a pejorative; terms for a person seen to be lazy include couch potato, slacker, and bludger.

Despite Sigmund Freud's discussion of the pleasure principle, Leonard Carmichael notes that "laziness is not a word that appears in the table of contents of most technical books on psychology... It is a guilty secret of modern psychology that more is understood about the motivation of thirsty rats and hungry pecking pigeons as they press levers than about the way in which poets make themselves write poems or scientists force themselves into the laboratory when the good golfing days of spring arrive."[1] A 1931 survey found that high school students were more likely to attribute their failing performance to laziness, while teachers ranked "lack of ability" as the major cause, with laziness coming in second.[2] Laziness is not to be confused with avolition, a negative symptom of certain mental health issues such as depression, ADHD, sleep disorders, and schizophrenia.[3][4]

Psychology[edit]

Laziness is a habit rather than a mental health issue. It may reflect a lack of self-esteem, a lack of positive recognition by others, a lack of discipline stemming from low self-confidence, or a lack of interest in the activity or belief in its efficacy. [5] Laziness may manifest as procrastination or vacillation. Studies of motivation suggest that laziness may be caused by a decreased level of motivation, which in turn can be caused by over-stimulation or excessive impulses or distractions. These increase the release of dopamine, a neurotransmitter responsible for reward and pleasure. The more dopamine that is released, the greater intolerance one has for valuing and accepting productive and rewarding action.[6] This desensitization leads to dulling of the neural patterns and affects negatively the anterior insula of the brain responsible for risk perception.[7] ADHD Specialists say being engaging in multiple activities can cause behavioral problems such as attention/focus failure or perfectionism and subsequently pessimism. In these circumstances laziness can manifest as a negative coping mechanism (aversion), the desire to avoid certain situations in the hopes of countering certain experiences and preconceived ill results.[8] Lacanian thought says laziness is the "acting out" of archetypes from societal programming and negative child rearing practices. Boredom is sometimes conflated with laziness; one study shows that the average Briton is bored 6 hours a week.[9] Thomas Goetz, University of Konstanz, Germany, and John Eastwood, York University, Canada, concur that aversive states such as laziness can be equally adaptive for making change[10] and toxic if allowed to fester. An outlook found to be helpful in their studies is "being mindful and not looking for ways out of it, simultaneously to be also open to creative and active options if they should arise." They point out that a relentless engaging in activities without breaks can cause oscillations of failure,[11] which may result in mental health issues.[12] It has also been shown that laziness can render one with apathetic to reactant mental health issues such as anger, anxiety, freeloading,[13][14] indifference, substance abuse, and depression.

Related concepts[edit]

Economics[edit]

Economists have differing views of laziness. Frédéric Bastiat argues that idleness is the result of people focusing on the pleasant immediate effects of their actions rather than potentially negative long-term consequences. Others note that humans seem to have a tendency to seek after leisure. Hal Cranmer writes, "For all these arguments against laziness, it is amazing we work so hard to achieve it. Even those hard-working Puritans were willing to break their backs every day in exchange for an eternity of lying around on a cloud and playing the harp. Every industry is trying to do its part to give its customers more leisure time."[15] Ludwig von Mises writes, "The expenditure of labor is deemed painful. Not to work is considered a state of affairs more satisfactory than working. Leisure is, other things being equal, preferred to travail (work). People work only when they value the return of labor higher than the decrease in satisfaction brought about by the curtailment of leisure. To work involves disutility."[16]

Literary[edit]

Religion[edit]

Christianity[edit]

Main article: Sloth (deadly sin)

One of the Catholic seven deadly sins is sloth, which is often defined as spiritual and/or physical apathy or laziness. Sloth is discouraged in (Hebrews 6:12), 2 Thessalonians, and associated with wickedness in one of the parables of Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew (Matthew 25:26). In the Wisdom books of Proverbs and Ecclesiastes, it is stated that laziness can lead to poverty (Proverbs 10:4, Ecclesiastes 10:18).[17][18] According to Peter Binsfeld's Binsfeld's Classification of Demons, Belphegor is thought to be its chief demon.[19]

Islam[edit]

The Arabic term used in the Quran for laziness, inactivity and sluggishness is كَسَل (kasal).[20] The opposite of laziness is Jihad al-Nafs, i.e. the struggle against the self, against one’s own ego. Among the five pillars of Islam, praying five times a day and fasting during Ramaḍān are part of actions against laziness.

Buddhism[edit]

Main article: Kausīdya

In Buddhism, the term kausīdya is commonly translated as "laziness" or "spiritual sloth". Kausīdya is defined as clinging to unwholesome activities such as lying down and stretching out, procrastinating, and not being enthusiastic about or engaging in virtuous activity.

Societal patterns[edit]

From 1909 to 1915, the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission for the Eradication of Hookworm Disease sought to eradicate hookworm infestation from 11 southern U.S. states. Hookworms were popularly known as "the germ of laziness" because they produced listlessness and weakness in the people they infested. Hookworms infested 40 percent of southerners and were identified in the North as the cause of the South's alleged backwardness.[21]

It was alleged[by whom?] that indolence was the reason for backward conditions in Indonesia, such as the failure to implement Green Revolution agricultural methods. But a counter-argument is that the Indonesians, living very precariously, sought to play it safe by not risking a failed crop, given that not all experiments introduced by outsiders had been successful.[22]

Animals[edit]

It is common for animals (even those like hummingbirds that have high energy needs) to forage for food until satiated, and then spend most of their time doing nothing, or at least nothing in particular. They seek to "satisfice" their needs rather than obtaining an optimal diet or habitat. Even diurnal animals, which have a limited amount of daylight in which to accomplish their tasks, follow this pattern. Social activity comes in a distant third to eating and resting for foraging animals. When more time must be spent foraging, animals are more likely to sacrifice time spent on aggressive behavior than time spent resting. Extremely efficient predators have more free time and thus often appear more lazy than relatively inept predators that have little free time.[23] Beetles likewise seem to forage lazily due to a lack of foraging competitors.[24] On the other hand, some animals, such as pigeons and rats, seem to prefer to respond for food rather than eat equally available "free food" in some conditions.[25]

In media[edit]

Literature[edit]

Films and TV Shows[edit]

  • The Big Lebowski, an iconic 1998 film featuring "The Dude", an unemployed slacker with a laid-back approach to life that inspired the religion Dudeism
  • Juan Tamad (literally Lazy John), a Philippine folklore character.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Leonard Carmichael (Apr 1954), Laziness and the Scholarly Life 78 (4), The Scientific Monthly, pp. 208–213, JSTOR 21392 
  2. ^ Harry Howard Gilbert (Jan 1931), High-School Students' Opinions on Reasons for Failure in High-School Subjects 23 (1), The Journal of Educational Research, pp. 46–49, JSTOR 27525294 
  3. ^ "NIMH · Schizophrenia". nih.gov. 
  4. ^ http://guilfordjournals.com/doi/abs/10.1521/adhd.10.1.6.20567?journalCode=adhd==Religious views==
  5. ^ https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/evolution-the-self/200806/laziness-fact-or-fiction
  6. ^ Wemesfelder, F.
  7. ^ http://www.livescience.com/20026-brain-dopamine-worker-slacker.html
  8. ^ Peter, University of Calgary
  9. ^ triviala.com
  10. ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilUaGnloq_8
  11. ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meiU6TxysCg
  12. ^ Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 38
  13. ^ http://drphil.com/articles/article/325/
  14. ^ http://drphil.com/articles/article/285
  15. ^ Cranmer, Hal (April 5, 2002), In Defense of Laziness, Ludwig von Mises Institute 
  16. ^ von Mises, Ludwig (1949), "Action Within the World", Human Action 
  17. ^ Top 7 Bible Verses About Laziness
  18. ^ http://www.openbible.info/topics/laziness
  19. ^ Defoe, Daniel (2003). The Political History of the Devil. New York: AMS Press. p. 338. ISBN 0-404-63544-X. 
  20. ^ http://corpus.quran.com/qurandictionary.jsp?q=ksl
  21. ^ Ronald L. Numbers (Jan 15, 1982), Review: The War against Hookworm 215 (4530), Science, New Series, pp. 280–281, JSTOR 1688243 
  22. ^ Karen A. Laidlaw and Ronald E. Seavoy (March 1979), The "Ethic of Indolence": Another View 10 (1), Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 190–193, JSTOR 20070277 
  23. ^ Joan M. Herbers (1981), Time Resources and Laziness in Animals 49 (2), Oecologia, pp. 252–262, JSTOR 4216378 
  24. ^ Bernd Heinrich and Elizabeth Mcclain (Mar–Apr 1986), "Laziness" and Hypothermia as a Foraging Strategy in Flower Scarabs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) 59 (2), Physiological Zoology, pp. 273–282, JSTOR 30156041 
  25. ^ Elkan R. Gamzu, David R. Williams, Barry Schwartz, Robert L. Welker, Gary Hansen, Larry A. Engberg and David R. Thomas (Jul 27, 1973), Pitfalls of Organismic Concepts: "Learned Laziness"? 181 (4097), Science, New Series, pp. 367–369, JSTOR 1736630 

External links[edit]