|This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2014)|
|This page has been copied to Wiktionary. Is it still needed in Wikipedia?
Because this article has content useful to Wikipedia's sister project Wiktionary, it has been transwikied there, and its dictionary counterpart can be found at either Wiktionary:Transwiki:Least count, Wiktionary:Least count, or Wiktionary:least count.
In metrology, the least count of a measuring instrument is the smallest change in the measured quantity that can be resolved on the instrument's scale. The least count is related to the precision of an instrument; an instrument that can measure smaller changes in a value relative to another instrument, has a smaller "least count" value and so is more precise. Any measurement made by the instrument can be considered repeatable to no less than the resolution of the least count. The least count of an instrument is inversely proportional to the precision of the instrument.
For example, a sundial may only have scale marks representing the hours of daylight; it would have a least count of one hour. A stopwatch used to time a race might resolve down to a hundredth of a second, its least count. The stopwatch is more precise at measuring time intervals than the sundial because it has more "counts" (scale intervals) in each hour of elapsed time.
Least count uncertainty is one of the sources of experimental error in measurements.
Least count error
The smallest value that can be measured by the measuring instrument is called its least count. Measured values are good only up to this value. The least count error is the error associated with the resolution of the instrument.
If we use a metre scale for measurement of length, it may have graduations at 1 mm division scale spacing or interval. A Vernier scale on caliper may have a least count of 0.1& nbsp;mm while a micrometer may have least count of 0.01
The least count error occurs with both systematic and random errors. Instruments of higher precision can reduce the least count error. By repeating the observations and taking the arithmetic mean of the result, the mean value would be very close to the true value of the measured quantity.fgs
- William Woolsey Johnson The Theory of Errors and Method of Least Squares,Press of I. Friedenwald, 1890; page 1