Legality of bitcoin by country
The legal status of bitcoin varies substantially from country to country and is still undefined or changing in many of them. While some countries have explicitly allowed its use and trade, others have banned or restricted it. Likewise, various government agencies, departments, and courts have classified bitcoins differently. While this article provides the legal status of bitcoin, regulations and bans that apply to this cryptocurrency likely extend to similar systems as well.
- 1 List by country
- 2 Details by country
- 2.1 Australia
- 2.2 China
- 2.3 Czech Republic
- 2.4 Denmark
- 2.5 Ecuador
- 2.6 Estonia
- 2.7 European Union
- 2.8 Finland
- 2.9 France
- 2.10 G7
- 2.11 Germany
- 2.12 Hong Kong
- 2.13 Iceland
- 2.14 India
- 2.15 Indonesia
- 2.16 Israel
- 2.17 Japan
- 2.18 Jordan
- 2.19 Lithuania
- 2.20 Luxembourg
- 2.21 Malaysia
- 2.22 Norway
- 2.23 Philippines
- 2.24 Poland
- 2.25 Russia
- 2.26 Singapore
- 2.27 Slovenia
- 2.28 Slovakia
- 2.29 South Africa
- 2.30 South Korea
- 2.31 Sweden
- 2.32 Switzerland
- 2.33 Taiwan
- 2.34 Thailand
- 2.35 Turkey
- 2.36 United Kingdom
- 2.37 United States
- 3 Footnotes
- 4 References
List by country
|Argentina||Under the National Constitution of Argentina, bitcoins may be considered money but not legal currency.:Argentina|
|Australia||In December 2013, the governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia indicated in an interview about bitcoin that "There would be nothing to stop people in this country deciding to transact in some other currency in a shop if they wanted to. There’s no law against that, so we do have competing currencies."|
|Bangladesh||In September 2014, Bangladesh Bank said that "anybody caught using the virtual currency could be jailed under the country's strict anti-money laundering laws".|
|Belgium||The Minister of Finance indicated that government intervention with regard to the bitcoin system does not appear necessary at the present time.:Belgium|
|Bolivia||Banco Central de Bolivia issued a resolution banning bitcoin in 2014.|
|Brazil||Not regulated, according to communication of Brazilian Central Bank 25.306/2014.|
|Bulgaria||Bitcoin is regulated by law that discusses payment systems and payment services.|
|Canada||Bitcoin would seem to be classified pursuant to the current provisions of the PPSA(= The Personal Property Security Act) simply as an "intangible".
|Chile||There is no regulation on the use of bitcoins.:Chile|
|China (PRC)||While private parties can hold and trade bitcoins in China, regulation prohibits financial firms like banks from doing the same.:China|
|Colombia||The circular from 26 March 2014 by Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia states that the use of bitcoin is not regulated in Colombia.|
|Croatia||On 6 December 2013, the Croatian National Bank reportedly conducted a discussion on the circulation of digital currencies and concluded that the bitcoin is not illegal in Croatia.:Croatia|
|Czech Republic||Bitcoin trading does not require authorization by the Czech National Bank and the Czech National Bank cannot grant such an authorization.|
|Cyprus||The use of bitcoins is not regulated in Cyprus.:Cyprus|
|Denmark||Denmark’s Financial Supervisory Authority issued a statement declaring that bitcoin is not a currency and stating that it will not regulate its use.:Denmark|
|Ecuador||Ecuadorian government issued a ban on bitcoin and other digital currencies.|
|Estonia||In Estonia, the use of bitcoins is not regulated or otherwise controlled by the government.:Estonia|
|European Union||The European Union has passed no specific legislation relative to the status of the bitcoin as a currency.:European Union|
|Finland||The Finnish Tax Administration has issued instructions for the taxation of virtual currencies, including the bitcoin.:Finland|
|France||The French Ministry of Finance issued regulations on July 11, 2014 pertaining to the operation of virtual currency professionals, exchanges, and taxation.|
|G7||In 2013 the G7's Financial Action Task Force issued the following statement in guidelines which may be applicable to companies involved in transmitting bitcoin and other currencies, "Internet-based payment services that allow third party funding from anonymous sources may face an increased risk of [money laundering/terrorist financing]."|
|Germany||According to the communication on bitcoin issued by Federal Financial Supervisory Authority on 19 December 2013, bitcoins are legally binding financial instruments that fall into the category of units of account, in accordance with the first sentence of section 1(11) of the German Banking Act.:Germany|
|Greece||No specific legislation on bitcoins exists in Greece.:Greece|
|Hong Kong||On 8 January 2014, the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury addressed bitcoin in the Legislative Council stating that "Hong Kong at present has no legislation directly regulating bitcoins and other virtual currencies of [a] similar kind. However, our existing laws (such as the Organised and Serious Crimes Ordinance) provide sanctions against unlawful acts involving bitcoins, such as fraud or money laundering.":Hong Kong|
|Iceland||According to a 2014 opinion from the Central Bank of Iceland "there is no authorization to purchase foreign currency from financial institutions in Iceland or to transfer foreign currency across borders on the basis of transactions with virtual currency. For this reason alone, transactions with virtual currency are subject to restrictions in Iceland." This does not stop businesses in Iceland from mining bitcoins.|
|India||On 28 December 2013, the Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, K. C. Chakrabarty, made a statement that the Reserve Bank of India had no plans to regulate bitcoin.|
|Indonesia||On 6 February 2014, the Bank Indonesia issued a press release related to bitcoin stating "In view of the Act No. 7 Year 2012 concerning Currency and Act No. 23 Year 1999 which has been amended several times, the latest with Act No. 6 Year 2009, Bank Indonesia states that bitcoin and other virtual currency are not currency or legal payment instrument in Indonesia."|
|Ireland||The Central Bank of Ireland was quoted in the Assembly of Ireland as stating that it does not regulate bitcoins.:Ireland|
|Israel||As of 23 December 2013, Israel had not adopted any specific legislation regulating bitcoins.:Israel|
|Italy||Italy does not regulate bitcoin use by private individuals.:Italy|
|Japan||Japan officially recognizes bitcoin and digital currencies as money.|
|Jordan||The government of Jordan has issued a warning discouraging the use of bitcoin and other similar systems.|
|Kyrgyzstan||In a July, 2014, statement of the National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic made clear that "the use of 'virtual currency', bitcoins, in particular, as a means of payment in the Kyrgyz Republic will be a violation of the law of our state."|
|Lebanon||The government of Lebanon has issued a warning discouraging the use of bitcoin and other similar systems.|
|Lithuania||Bank of Lithuania released a warning on 31 January 2014 that bitcoin is not recognized as legal tender in Lithuania and that bitcoin users should be aware of high risks that come with the usage of it.|
|Luxembourg||The Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier has issued a communication in February 2014 acknowledging the status of currency to the bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. The first BitLicence was issued in October 2015, and the government is actively supporting this development.|
|Malaysia||No official statement regarding the Bank Negara Malaysia’s views of the bitcoin system was located.:Malaysia|
|Malta||Malta currently does not have any regulations specifically pertaining to bitcoins.:Malta|
|New Zealand||The Reserve Bank of New Zealand states: "Non-banks do not need our approval for schemes that involve the storage and/or transfer of value (such as ‘bitcoin’) – so long as they do not involve the issuance of physical circulating currency (notes and coins).":New Zealand|
|Netherlands||Virtual currencies such as bitcoins currently do not fall within the scope of the Act on Financial Supervision of the Netherlands.:Netherlands|
|Nicaragua||News reports indicate that bitcoins are being used in the country.:Nicaragua|
|Norway||The Norwegian Tax Administration has issued a statement that bitcoins will be treated as capital property for tax-related purposes.:Norway|
|Pakistan||Currently there are no regulations in Pakistan. As per State Bank of Pakistan, bitcoin is unregulated until some bigger player wants to enter the market.|
|Philippines||On 6 March 2014, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) issued a statement on risks associated with bitcoin trading and usage. Bitcoin exchanges are not regulated by BSP at the moment.|
|Poland||The use of the bitcoin in Poland is not regulated by a legal act at present.:Poland|
|Portugal||The bitcoin has no specific legal framework in Portugal.:Portugal|
|Romania||As of March 2015, an official statement of the Romanian National Bank mentioned that "using digital currencies as payment has certain risks for the financial system".|
|Russia||As of January 2015, a bill explicitly banning bitcoins does not exist in Russia, although it appears a de facto ban is in place. CNBC reported that bitcoin was illegal in Russia in December, 2014, and various Russian authorities and organizations have spoken out or taken actions against bitcoin. In early 2015, Russia’s media regulator blocked several bitcoin-related websites, in 2015 a Russian state-owned media outlet reported that "The [Russian] Central Bank... said that bitcoin usage was illegal under Russian federal law," and in February 2014, the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office was quoted as saying, "Cyber currencies... including the most well-known, bitcoin, are money substitutes and cannot be used by individuals or legal entities."|
|Singapore||In December 2013, the Monetary Authority of Singapore reportedly stated that "[w]hether or not businesses accept bitcoins in exchange for their goods and services is a commercial decision in which MAS does not intervene.":Singapore|
|Slovakia||The National Bank of Slovakia (NBS), stated that bitcoin does not have the legal attributes of a currency, and therefore does not fall under national control.|
|Slovenia||On December 23, 2013, the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Slovenia issued a formal opinion about the status of the bitcoin and other virtual currencies in response to a request from the Tax Administration of the Republic of Slovenia. The opinion states that the bitcoin is not a monetary means under Slovenian law and not a financial instrument.:Slovenia|
|South Africa||In December of 2014 the Reserve Bank of South Africa issued a position paper on Virtual Currencies whereby it declared that virtual currency had ‘no legal status or regulatory framework’. |
|South Korea||While not illegal in the country, Korean authorities will prosecute illegal activity involving bitcoin and have indicted at least one individual for purchasing drugs with bitcoin.|
|Spain||Transactions in bitcoins are subject to the same laws as barter transactions.:Spain|
|Sweden||The Swedish Tax Agency has given a preliminary ruling on Value Added Tax (VAT) on bitcoins, stating that trade in bitcoins is not subject to Swedish VAT, but is instead subject to the Finansinspektionen (Financial Supervisory Authority) regulations and treated as a currency. The decision has been appealed by the Swedish Tax Authority.:Sweden|
|Switzerland||Bitcoin businesses in Switzerland are subject to anti-money laundering regulations and in some instances may need to obtain a banking license.|
|Taiwan||Bitcoin ATMs are banned here:Taiwan but bitcoins can be purchased at over 6000 convenience store kiosks.|
|Thailand||Bank of Thailand declared bitcoin illegal in 2013, but some bitcoin companies have been able to obtain business licenses. One startup denied a business license was reportedly told that "buying and selling bitcoins, using bitcoins to buy or sell goods and services, and transferring bitcoins in and out of Thailand were all currently illegal."
Update 2016 May,10: Bank of Thailand Suggests Bitcoin Not Illegal But Warns Against its Use.
|Turkey||No formal regulations on the bitcoin exist in Turkey.:Turkey|
|United Kingdom||The government of the United Kingdom has stated that the bitcoin is currently unregulated.:United Kingdom|
|United States||The U.S. Treasury classified bitcoin as a convertible decentralized virtual currency in 2013.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission, CFTC, classified bitcoin as a commodity in September 2015.
|Vietnam||Bitcoin is not lawfully approved and protected according to State Bank of Vietnam in February, 2014. Trading in bitcoin in Vietnam is still unrestricted and unregulated by law, and two largest bitcoin markets in Vietnam - VBTC and Bitcoin Vietnam are working without being restricted.|
Details by country
In December 2013, the governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) indicated in an interview about bitcoin legality stating, "There would be nothing to stop people in this country deciding to transact in some other currency in a shop if they wanted to. There’s no law against that, so we do have competing currencies."
While private parties can hold and trade bitcoins in China, regulation prohibits financial firms like banks from doing the same.:China On 5 December 2013, China Central Bank made its first step in regulating bitcoin by prohibiting financial institutions from handling bitcoin transactions. In a statement on the central bank’s website the People's Bank of China said financial institutions and payment companies cannot give pricing in, buy and sell bitcoin or insure bitcoin-linked products. On 16 December it was speculated that the People's Bank of China had issued a new ban on third-party payment processors from doing business with bitcoin exchanges, however a statement from BTC China suggests this isn't accurate, and rather payment processors had voluntarily withdrawn their services. On 1 April 2014 China Central Bank ordered commercial banks and payment companies to close bitcoin trading accounts in two weeks. Trading bitcoins by individuals is legal in China.
On 25 September 2013, Analytical department of Ministry of Finance of Czech Republic published legal guidance for buying and selling digital currencies. Transactions worth more than 1.000 EUR are considered "AML high-risk" in accordance to § 6 para. of Act No. 253/2008 Code. Transactions worth more than 15.000 EUR are considered "AML suspicious" in accordance to § 18 of Act No. 253/2008 Code.[note 1]
The Czech National Bank (CNB) stated on February 10, 2014:
- "The data in the bitcoin protocol do not have the character of receivables from another person, therefore they are neither cashless means of payment nor electronic money (§4 of ZPS - Czech Payment System Law) resp. funds in the sense of §2/1c ZPS. The purchase or sale of bitcoins for personal use is neither a payment service in the sense of §3/1 ZPS, nor a cashless trade with foreign currency (§2/1e ZPS). In the same vein, sending a transaction in the bitcoin protocol (e.g., sending a specific amount of bitcoins to another user) or 'management of a bitcoin account for another person' (when a different person manages bitcoins for their owner, typically using a 'virtual wallet' at an Internet page) does not represent a payment service in the sense of ZPS... Therefore, bitcoin trading does not require authorization by the CNB (and the CNB cannot grant such an authorization), and is not a subject of supervision."[note 2]
- "A purchase or sale of bitcoins does not induce the status of an obliged person in terms of AML regulations, but if an obliged person – a financial institution, real estate business, etc. – meets bitcoin trading, it should pay a special attention..."[note 3]
- "We conclude that an authorization for acceptance of bitcoins in payment for goods or services by CNB is not needed. But it is important to warn that in the Czech environment, a systematic denial of domestic banknotes and coins could carry out the attributes of a criminal act, threatening the circulation of domestic money."[note 4]
On 17 December 2013, Denmark's Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) has issued a statement that echoes EBA's warning. In addition, FSA says that doing business with bitcoin does not fall under its regulatory authority and therefore FSA does not currently prevent anyone from opening such businesses. FSA's chief legal adviser says that Denmark might consider amending existing financial legislation to cover virtual currencies.
The National Assembly of Ecuador banned bitcoins including other decentralized digital/crypto currencies. Due to the establishment of a new state-run electronic money system. Ecuador's new project would be controlled by the government and tied directly to the local currency—the dollar. Users will be able to pay for select services and send money between individuals. This will begin in mid-February 2015. "Electronic money is designed to operate and support the monetary scheme of dollarization," economist Diego Martinez, a delegate of the President of the Republic to the Board of Regulation and Monetary and Financial Policy.
The Estonian Central bank refers to bitcoin as a "problematic scheme" and "Ponzi scheme". The Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit stated that every person who exchanges any amount of bitcoin requires a license and that every person who trades more than 1000 Euro per months needs to be met in person and a copy of id made and kept.
According to the European Central Bank, traditional financial sector regulation is not applicable to bitcoin because it does not involve traditional financial actors.:5 Others in the EU have stated, however, that existing rules can be extended to include bitcoin and bitcoin companies.
The European Central Bank classifies bitcoin as a convertible decentralized virtual currency.:6 In July 2014 the European Banking Authority advised European banks not to deal in virtual currencies such as bitcoin until a regulatory regime was in place.
In October 2015, the European Court of Justice ruled that bitcoin transactions are exempt from consumption tax similarly as traditional cash. According to judges, the tax shouldn’t be charged because bitcoins should be treated as a means of payment.
Ruling 034/2014 by the Finnish Central Board of Taxes (CBT) stated that commission fees charged on bitcoin purchases by an exchange market were, under the EU VAT Directive, banking services and therefore VAT exempt. This is because the court classified bitcoins as payment instruments - whereas most countries treat their use as an unregulated method for the exchange of goods, or even as a crime.
The French Ministry of Finance issued regulations on July 11, 2014 requiring:
1) Identity verification during the opening of, withdrawal from, or deposit to a virtual currency account.
2) Capital gains are taxable as business profits (BIC) or as non-commercial profits (BNC), depending on if the activity is undertaken habitually or not. Assets held in bitcoin must also be reported pertaining to the wealth tax (ISF).
3) Proposed ceiling on payments consistent with current rules for cash payments.
4) Conformance with regulations at the European Union level for bitcoin exchanges pertaining to identity verification of transaction participants and anti-money laundering.
In 2013 the G7's Financial Action Task Force issued the following statement in guidelines which may be applicable to companies involved in transmitting bitcoin and other currencies, "Internet-based payment services that allow third party funding from anonymous sources may face an increased risk of [money laundering/terrorist financing]." They concluded that this may "pose challenges to countries in [anti-money laundering/counter terrorist financing] regulation and supervision".
On 19 August 2013, the German Finance Ministry announced that bitcoin is now essentially a "unit of account" and can be used for the purpose of tax and trading in the country. It is not classified as a foreign currency or e–money but stands as "private money" which can be used in "multilateral clearing circles", according to the ministry.
On 16 November 2013, Norman Chan, the chief executive of Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) said that bitcoins is only a virtual commodity. He also decided that bitcoins will not be regulated by HKMA. However, the authority will be closely watching the usage of bitcoins locally and its development overseas.
The Icelandic Central Bank confirmed that "it is prohibited to engage in foreign exchange trading with the electronic currency bitcoin, according to the Icelandic Foreign Exchange Act".
In June 2013, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued a notice acknowledging that virtual currencies posed legal, regulatory and operational challenges. In August 2013, a spokesperson wrote in an email that bitcoin was under observation.
On 24 December 2013, the Reserve Bank of India issued an advisory to the Indian public to be cautious in buying or selling of virtual currencies, including bitcoin. Following the announcement bitcoin operators in the country began suspending operations.
The first raid in India was undertaken a couple of days later in Ahmedabad by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on the office of the website, buysellbit.co.in, that provided a platform to trade in this virtual currency. The preliminary investigations found it to be in violation of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA).
On 21 December 2013, Difi Ahmad, the executive director of communication at Bank Indonesia (BI) said that bitcoin is a potential payment method but could potentially be used in scams and money laundering operations. Since it is not regulated by banks, it has its associated risks. The central bank of Indonesia is currently studying bitcoin and they have no plans to issue regulations on it.
On 16 January 2014, Ronald Waas, deputy governor of Bank Indonesia said that bitcoin usage would break a number of laws including Undang-undang Bank Indonesia (Bank Indonesia Act), Undang-undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (Information and Electronic Transaction Act), and Undang-undang Mata Uang (Monetary Act). For example, Undang-undang Mata Uang states that Rupiah is the only legal tender in the country. He also strongly advised the public against using bitcoins because security of bitcoins transactions are not guaranteed. However, currently BI does not have detailed policies of regulating or banning bitcoins usage.
On 6 February 2014, Bank Indonesia is stating that bitcoin and other virtual currencies are not currencies or legal tender in Indonesia. The people are urged to exercise caution towards bitcoin and other virtual currencies. All risks regarding ownership or use of bitcoin are borne by the owner or user of bitcoin and other virtual currencies. In September 2014, deputy governor of BI discourage the public against using bitcoin as a payment method.
On February 19, 2014, the Bank of Israel issued a public service announcement detailing some of the risks associated with using bitcoin.
On August 11, 2014, the Bank of Israel announced the formation of an inter-bureau team exploring the bitcoin issue, including representatives of the Bank of Israel, Ministry of Finance, Israel Money Laundering and Terror Financing Prohibition Authority, Israel Tax Authority, Israel Securities Authority and more. As of March 2015, no official guidelines regarding bitcoin have been published.
The Israel Bar Association considers the virtual currency an appropriate form of payment for attorneys.
On 7 March 2014, the Japanese government, in response to a series of questions asked in the National Diet, made a cabinet decision on the legal treatment of bitcoins in the form of answers to the questions. The decision did not see bitcoin as currency nor bond under the current Banking Act and Financial Instruments and Exchange Law, prohibiting banks and securities companies from dealing in bitcoins. The decision also acknowledges that there are no laws to unconditionally prohibit individuals or legal entities from receiving bitcoins in exchange for goods or services. Taxes may be applicable to bitcoins.
The Central Bank of Jordan prohibits banks, currency exchanges, financial companies, and payment service companies from dealing in bitcoins or other digital currencies. While it warned the public of risks of bitcoins, and that they are not legal tender, bitcoins are still accepted by small businesses and merchants.
Bank of Lithuania released a warning on 31 January 2014 that bitcoin is not recognized as legal tender in Lithuania and that bitcoin users should be aware of high risks that come with the usage of it.
The Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) issued a communication in February 2014 stating the country's position regarding "virtual currencies": "virtual" currencies are considered as money, since they are accepted as a means of payment of goods and services by a sufficiently large group of people.
More specifically, they are scriptural money as opposed to cash in the form of banknotes and coins. The scriptural nature does not require a tangible writing, similarly to electronic documents or signatures that do not require paper. Virtual currencies may thus be electronic money, but not necessarily within the meaning of the European Directive 2009/110 which provides for a definition of electronic money limited to its own scope.
The issuing of virtual currencies is not regulated from a monetary point of view. On the other hand, the CSSF reminds that nobody can be established in Luxembourg to carry out an activity of the financial sector without an authorisation by the Minister of Finance and without being subject to the prudential supervision of the CSSF (Article 14 of the law of 5 April 1993 on the financial sector).
Therefore, the potential interested persons who would like to establish themselves in Luxembourg in order to carry out an activity of the financial sector (as, for instance, the issuing of means of payments in the form of virtual or other currencies, the provision of payment services using virtual or other currencies, the creation of a market (platform) to trade virtual or other currencies) shall define their business purpose and their activity in a sufficiently concrete and precise manner to allow the CSSF to determine for which status they need to receive the ministerial authorisation.
The CSSF encouraged these individuals to contact its officials about facilitating digital currency-related commerce in the country, and suggested it will operate on a case-by-case basis with its regulatory decisions.
The first Luxembourg "BitLicence" has been granted on 12 October 2015 to SnapSwap. The CSSF explained in May 2015 that a few companies were in the process of acquiring a similar licences, further adding it was possible to get "Your licence within six months".
On 4 November 2013, Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) met with local bitcoin proponents to learn more about the currency but did not comment at the time. BNM issued a statement on 6 January 2014 that bitcoin is not recognised as a legal tender in Malaysia. The central bank will not regulate bitcoin operations at the moment and users should aware of the risks associated with bitcoin usage.
The Norwegian Tax Administration stated in December 2013 that they don't define bitcoin as money but regard it as an asset. Profits are subjected to wealth tax. In business, use of bitcoin falls under the sales tax regulation.
On 6 March 2014, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) issued a statement on risks associated with bitcoin trading and usage. Bitcoin exchanges are not regulated by BSP at the moment. BSP will be monitoring the possibility of bitcoin usage in money laundering and other illegal purposes.
Szymon Woźniak of the Ministry of Finance made an official announcement on the legality of bitcoin on 18 December 2013 at a conference at the Warsaw School of Economics stating that the Ministry of Finance does not consider bitcoin illegal and does not want to hinder its development. He clarified that while not illegal, bitcoin cannot be considered legal tender, and, in the light of the directives of the European Union, it is neither electronic money. As of January 27, 2015 several banks have closed accounts of clients trading bitcoin, and indicated "presumption of criminal offense" as the cause, with "criminal offense" presumably being "cryptocurrency trade".
CNBC reported that bitcoin was illegal in Russia in 2014, as did the European Parliament.:Russia Various Russian authorities and organizations have spoken out or taken actions against bitcoin. In early 2015, Russia’s media regulator blocked several bitcoin-related websites, and a Russian state-owned media outlet reported that according to "the [Russian] Central Bank... bitcoin usage [is] illegal under Russian federal law," and in February 2014, the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office was quoted as saying, "Cyber currencies... including the most well-known, bitcoin, are money substitutes and cannot be used by individuals or legal entities." In 2014 the Bank of Russia issued a statement on bitcoin usage in which it was characterized as money substitute banned in Russia. In February 2014, Russia's Prosecutor General's Office claimed that bitcoin is a money substitute and "cannot be used by individuals or legal entities". In September 2014, Deputy Finance Minister Aleksey Moiseev announced that a law will be passed by Spring 2015. In July 2016, Deputy Finance Minister Aleksey Moiseev announced that the new law will define bitcoin as a foreign currency. Russians will be able to buy bitcoins and use them abroad. He is also expected that the new law will pass by the end of 2016.
On September 22, 2013, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) warned users of the risks associated with using bitcoin stating "If bitcoin ceases to operate, there may not be an identifiable party responsible for refunding their monies or for them to seek recourse" and in December 2013 stated "Whether or not businesses accept bitcoins in exchange for their goods and services is a commercial decision in which MAS does not intervene" In January 2014, the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore issued a series of tax guidelines according to which bitcoin transactions may be treated as a barter exchange if it is used as a payment method for real goods and services. Businesses that deal with bitcoin currency exchanges will be taxed based on their bitcoin sales.
On December 23, 2013 the Slovenian Ministry of Finance made an announcement  stating that bitcoin is neither a currency nor an asset. There is no capital gains tax chargeable on bitcoin, however bitcoin mining is taxed and businesses selling goods/services in bitcoin are also taxed.
The National Bank of Slovakia (NBS), stated that bitcoin does not have the legal attributes of a currency, and therefore does not fall under national control.[note 5] European legislation, including the Slovak law, does not define the activities associated with virtual currency. Such activities are not regulated and supervised by the National Bank of Slovakia or the European Central Bank. At the same time NBS points out that any legal person or natural person in the Slovak Republic shall not issue any notes or any other coins. Unlawful manufacturing of banknotes and coins and putting them into circulation is punishable by law. In this context, NBS points out that virtual currencies have not a physical counterpart in the form of legal tender and participation in such a scheme (virtual currency) is at your own risk. Exchanges or purchases of virtual currencies represent the business risk of investors and investors' money are not protected. For any compensation or losses caused by such exchanges or purchases there is no legal entitlement.
The South Africa Reserve Bank Position Paper on Virtual Currencies issued on 3 December 2014 came to 3 conclusions:
1. The Bank does not oversee, supervise or regulate the Virtual Currency (VC) landscape, systems or intermediaries for effectiveness, soundness, integrity or robustness. Consequently, any and all activities related to the acquisition, trading or use of VCs (particularly Decentralized Convertible Virtual Currencies - DCVCs) are performed at the end-user‟s sole and independent risk and have no recourse to the Bank.
2. Given the current landscape and information currently available, the Bank contends that VCs pose no significant risk to financial stability, price stability or the National Payment System. However, end-users, whether individuals or businesses that accept VCs and businesses involved in the VCs ecosystem, are cautioned that any activities performed or undertaken with VCs are at their sole and independent risk.
3. In line with the Bank‟s position that regulation should follow innovation, the Bank continues monitoring developments in this regard and reserves the right to change its position should the landscape warrant regulatory intervention.
There are no laws in South Korea regulating the use of bitcoin at present.:South Korea On December 12, 2013, the president of the Bank of Korea recommended at a press conference that bitcoin be regulated in the future.
The Swedish jurisdiction is in general quite favorable for bitcoin businesses and users as compared to other countries within the EU and the rest of the world. The governmental regulatory and supervisory body Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (Finansinspektionen) have legitimized the fast growing industry by publicly proclaiming bitcoin and other digital currencies as a means of payment. For certain businesses interacting with fiat (mainly exchanges) the current regulation dictates that an application for approval/license must be filed and all the AML/CTF and KYC regulations applicable to more traditional financial service providers must be followed.
On 5 December 2013 a proposal was put forth by 45 members of the Swiss Parliament for digital sustainability (Pardigli), that calls on the Swiss government to evaluate the opportunities for utilization of bitcoin by the country’s financial sector. It also seeks clarification on the bitcoin’s legal standing with respect to VAT, securities and anti-money laundering laws.
In response to the parliament postulates, the Swiss Federal Council issued a report on virtual currencies in June 2014. The report states that since virtual currencies are not in a legal vacuum, the Federal Council has concluded that there is no need for legislative measures to be taken at the moment.
While bitcoin itself is not illegal here, approvals for bitcoin ATMs have been refused.:Taiwan
On 6 December 2013, Perng Fai-nan said that bitcoin is only used in certain communities. Besides, he also opined that the value of bitcoin is a bubble and is highly volatile. Therefore, he advised the public against the speculation of bitcoins to prevent making a loss during the process. The central bank is closely watching the development of bitcoin and plan to impose regulations in the future.
On 31 December 2013, Financial Supervisory Commission (Republic of China) (FSC) and CBC issued a joint statement which warns against the use of bitcoins. It is stated that bitcoins remains highly volatile, highly speculative, and is not entitled to legal claims or guarantee of conversion.
On 5 January 2014, FSC chairman Tseng Ming-chung stated that FSC will not allow the installation of bitcoin ATM in Taiwan because bitcoin is not a currency and it should not be accepted by individuals and banks as payment.
However, despite this, three of the four major convenience store chains in Taiwan make available bitcoin purchases through their kiosk systems, and the largest chain now allows bitcoin to be used for purchases.
In 2013, the Thai monetary authority, the Bank of Thailand, "issued a preliminary ruling that using bitcoins as described was illegal." A bitcoin startup denied a business license was reportedly told that "buying and selling bitcoins, using bitcoins to buy or sell goods and services, and transferring bitcoins in and out of Thailand were all currently illegal."
Bitcoin is treated as 'private money'. When bitcoin is exchanged for sterling or for foreign currencies, such as euro or dollar, no VAT will be due on the value of the bitcoins themselves. However, in all instances, VAT will be due in the normal way from suppliers of any goods or services sold in exchange for bitcoin or other similar cryptocurrency. Profits and losses on cryptocurrencies are subject to capital gains tax.
The U.S. Treasury classified bitcoin as a convertible decentralized virtual currency in 2013. A Magistrate Judge of a Texas U.S. District Court classified bitcoin as a currency. A June 2014 U.S. government auction of almost 30,000 bitcoins, which the U.S. Marshals Service seized in October 2013 from Silk Road, was said to increase legitimacy of the currency.
The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) recommended in May 2013, that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) formulate a tax guidance for bitcoin businesses. End of March 2014, in time for 2013 tax filing, the IRS issued a guidance that it considered virtual currency as property for federal taxation and that "an individual who 'mines' virtual currency as a trade or business [is] subject to self-employment tax".
In November 2013, the United States Senate held a committee hearing titled "Beyond Silk Road: Potential Risks, Threats and Promises of Virtual Currencies" to discuss virtual currencies. At this hearing, held by senator Tom Carper, bitcoin and other currencies were received generally positively, in that bitcoin was a "legal means of exchange" and that "online payment systems, both centralized and decentralized, offer legitimate financial services" per US officials Peter Kadzik and Mythili Raman.
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) deadlocked in November 2013 on whether to allow bitcoin in political campaigns with three Democrat members voting nay, three Republicans voting yea. Political bitcoin pioneers New Hampshire House member Mark Warden and Southern California politician Michael B. Glenn independently from each other accepted bitcoin in their campaigns, and paved the way for others to follow suit. In May 2014, the FEC issued draft guidance to U.S. politicians who want to receive bitcoin donations. It declined to declare bitcoins currency, stating they fit into its "anything of value" definition.
In May 2014, Brett Stapper, co-founder of Falcon Global Capital, registered to lobby members of Congress and federal agencies on issues related to bitcoin.
In January 2014, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) focused on whether bitcoin-denominated stock exchanges were illegal, and inquired into unregistered securities offerings of the gambling site SatoshiDice and FeedZeBirds. In May it warned investors that "both fraudsters and promoters of high-risk investment schemes may target bitcoin users". The SEC charged and settled with the former owner of SatoshiDice and FeedZeBirds in June 2014 for selling unregistered securities. In October 2014, former SEC Chair Arthur Levitt joined BitPay, a bitcoin payment processor, and Vaurum, a bitcoin exchange for institutional investors in advisory roles.
The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) stated in March 2014 it considered regulation of digital currencies after TeraExchange announced to launch a swap. TeraExchange constructed an index for the value of bitcoin from six different exchanges. The dollar value of a given bitcoin amount is locked in the swap. The CFTC approved the financial product in September 2014, satisfied it "could not easily be manipulated". There may be significant legal issues around security interests in bitcoin under the Uniform Commercial Code.[vague]
In June 2014 California Assemblyman Roger Dickinson (D–Sacramento) submitted draft legislation (Assembly Bill 129) to legalize bitcoin and other forms of alternative and digital currency. After the GAO had called for increased oversight of bitcoin, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau warned consumers of bitcoin being risky.
As of May 2015[update], New York state is the only state with a final bitcoin rule, commonly referred to as a BitLicense. In March 2014, the New York State Department of Financial Services led by superintendent Benjamin Lawsky had officially invited bitcoin exchanges to apply with them, and in July 2014 it published draft regulations for virtual currency businesses. Businesses would have to provide transaction receipts, disclosures about risks, policies to handle customer complaints, maintain a cybersecurity program, hire a compliance officer and verify details about their customers to follow anti-money-laundering rules, per FinCEN.
- Translated from: Podle § 6 odst. 1 AML zákona je za podezřelý obchod třeba považovat „obchod uskutečněný za okolností vyvolávajících podezření ze snahy o legalizaci výnosů z trestné činnosti nebo podezření, že v obchodu užité prostředky jsou určeny k financování terorismu“. FAÚ proto vyzývá všechny povinné osoby, aby v souvislosti s nákupem/prodejem jakékoli digitální měny, jako je například Bitcoin, byla jako velmi riziková k posouzení a k rozhodnutí o dalších opatřeních podle okolností každá platba nad hodnotu 1.000 EUR a vždy jako podezřelý obchod postupem podle § 18 AML zákona oznámena transakce nad hodnotu 15.000 EUR.
- Translated from: Data evidovaná v protokolu bitcoin... nemají charakter pohledávky držitele bitcoinů za jinou osobou, nejsou to tedy bezhotovostní peněžní prostředky ani elektronické peníze (§ 4 ZPS), resp. peněžní prostředky ve smyslu ustanovení § 2 odst. 1 písm. c) ZPS. Nákup či prodej bitcoinů na vlastní účet nepředstavuje žádnou z platebních služeb podle § 3 odst. 1 ZPS ani bezhotovostní obchod s cizí měnou [§ 2 odst. 1 písm. e) ZPS]. Stejně tak nepředstavuje žádnou platební službu ve smyslu ZPS provedení transakce v rámci protokolu bitcoin (např. zaslání určitého množství bitcoinů jinému uživateli protokolu) ani "vedení účtu v bitcoinech" (kdy za vlastníka bitcoinů spravuje jeho bitcoiny, typicky v rámci "virtuální peněženky" na internetové stránce, jiná osoba)... Obchodování s bitcoiny proto nevyžaduje povolení ČNB (takové povolení ČNB ani nemůže udělit) a nepodléhá dohledu ČNB.
- Translated from: Samotný nákup a prodej bitcoinů statut povinné osoby nezakládá, ale pokud se některá povinná osoba – finanční instituce, obchodník s nemovitostmi či kulturními památkami, provozovatel loterie aj. – v rámci své podnikatelské činnosti setká s obchody s bitcoiny, měla by jim věnovat zvýšenou pozornost...
- Translated from: Závěrem dodáváme, že povolení ČNB není potřebné ani k přijímání úhrad zboží a služeb prostřednictvím bitcoinů. Je však třeba upozornit, že soustavné odmítání tuzemských bankovek a mincí by mohlo naplnit znaky skutkové podstaty trestného činu ohrožování oběhu tuzemských peněz.
- Translated from: ...bitcoin nespĺňa atribúty meny v právnom zmysle (jeho platnosť na určitom území nie je mocensky ustanovená, právny poriadok neupravuje jej obeh ani ochranu), zastávame názor, že ho nie je možné označovať za menu.
- "Regulation of Bitcoin in Selected Jurisdictions". loc.gov. The Law Library of Congress, Global Legal Research Center. 2014. Retrieved 25 February 2015.
- Hartge-Hazelman, Bianca (December 13, 2013). "Glenn Stevens says Bitcoins show promise, but so did tulips". JHT. The Australian Financial Review. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
- AFP (15 Sep 2014). "Why Bangladesh will jail Bitcoin traders". telegraph.co.uk. The Telegraph. Retrieved 23 February 2015.
- "Resolución 044/2014" (PDF) (in Spanish). Retrieved 2014-06-20.
- Cuthbertson, Anthony (20 June 2014). "Cryptocurrency Round-Up: Bolivian Bitcoin Ban, iOS Apps & Dogecoin at McDonald's". ibtimes.co.uk. International Business Times. Retrieved 23 February 2015.
- "Busca de Normativos". www3.bcb.gov.br. Retrieved 2016-09-11.
- "Закон за платежните услуги и платежните системи". loc.gov. Държавен вестник. 2015. Retrieved 28 July 2015.
- Canada: Can You Take A Security Interest In Bitcoin?,Mondaq,May 14.2014.Wednewday 4:10PM EST,Ms M. Sandra Appel(A security Agreement for Bitcoin: Is it Possible?)
- Rubenfeld, Samuel (23 June 2014). "Canada Enacts Bitcoin Regulations". Risk and Compliance Journal. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 24 February 2015.
- Szczepański, Marcin (November 2014). "Bitcoin: Market, economics and regulation" (PDF). European Parliamentary Research Service. Annex B: Bitcoin regulation or plans therefor in selected countries. Members' Research Service. p. 9. Retrieved 18 February 2015.
- "Riesgos de las operaciones realizadas con "Monedas Virtuales"". Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia. 26 March 2014. Retrieved 20 October 2015.
- "Obchodování s bitcoiny" (PDF). Czech National Bank. Retrieved 19 March 2015.
- Cuthbertson, Anthony (1 September 2014). "Ecuador Reveals National Digital Currency Plans Following Bitcoin Ban". ibtimes.co.uk. International Business Times. Retrieved 23 February 2015.
- "Réguler les monnaies virtuelles" (PDF). Ministre des Finances. Retrieved 6 June 2016.
- "Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach: Prepaid Cards, Mobile Payments and Internet-based Payment Services" (PDF). Guidance for a risk-based approach. Paris: Financial Action Task Force (FATF). June 2013. p. 47. Retrieved 6 March 2014.
- "Significant risk attached to use of virtual currency". cb.is. The Central Bank of Iceland. 19 March 2014. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
- Fidel Martinez and Rob Wile (23 September 2014). "U.S. hesitation is chasing Bitcoin to Europe". Retrieved 8 January 2015.
- Nathaniel Popper (21 December 2013). "Into the Bitcoin Mines". Deal Book New York Times. New Yotk Times Company. Retrieved 9 December 2014.
- "No move to regulate Bitcoins: RBI". The Times of India. 29 December 2013. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
- Jacobs, Peter (6 February 2014). "Statement of Bank Indonesia Related To Bitcoin and Other Virtual Currency". Press Releases. Bank of Indonesia. Retrieved 20 October 2015.
- Bitconnect.co. "Japan Officially Recognizes Bitcoin and Digital Currencies as Money - Bitconnect".
- Knutsen, Elise (24 Feb 2014). "Despite warnings, Bitcoin gains toehold in region". dailystar.com.lb. The Daily Star. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
[In February of 2014] the Central Bank of Jordan issued a warning against the currency, becoming the second government in the region to do so after Lebanon.
- "Warning of the National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic on the spread and use of the "virtual currency", in particular, bitcoins (bitcoin)". nbkr.kg. National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic. 18 July 2014. Retrieved 23 February 2015.
- "Lietuvos bankas apsisprendė dėl bitkoinų". vz.lt. 31 January 2014. Retrieved 31 January 2014.
- "Communique virtual currencies" (PDF). Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
- Rizzo, Pete. "Luxembourg Opens Dialogue with Bitcoin Businesses in New Statement". Regulation. CoinDesk. Retrieved 19 October 2015.
- "SnapSwap granted first bitLicense in Europe". SnapSwap. Retrieved 19 October 2015.
- Rizzo, Pete (12 October 2015). "Scorechain Raises $570k for European Bitcoin Compliance Solution". Companies. CoinDesk. Retrieved 19 October 2015.
- "Legality of bitcoin in Pakistan". 20 November 2015.
- "Warning Advisory on Virtual Currencies". Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas. 6 March 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- "Banca Naţională a României". www.bnr.ro. Retrieved 2016-02-03.
- "Russian media watchdog blocks Bitcoin sites". rt.com. RT/Russia Today (Autonomous Nonprofit Organization "TV-Novosti"). 13 January 2015. Retrieved 23 February 2015.
- Clinch, Matt (17 Dec 2014). "Russians move into bitcoin as ruble tanks". cnbc.com. CNBC. Retrieved 23 February 2015.
A cryptocurrency exchange based in Bulgaria, called BTC-e, is known in the industry as being the most Russian-friendly despite bitcoin being made illegal in Russia.
- Baczynska, Gabriela (9 February 2014). "Russian authorities say Bitcoin illegal". reuters.com. Thompson Reuters. Retrieved 25 February 2015.
- "Niekoľko úvah k virtuálnej mene bitcoin" (PDF). Slovak National Bank. Retrieved 24 March 2015.
- "Position Paper on Virtual Currencies" (PDF). South African Reserve Bank.
- Russell, Jon (10 December 2013). "Korea becomes the latest Asian country to reject Bitcoin as a legitimate currency". thenextweb.com. The Next Web. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
- "Korean-American caught buying illegal drugs with Bitcoin". The Korea Herald. Herald Corporation. 17 March 2014. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
- "Fact sheet Status: Bitcoins" (PDF). finma.ch/. FINMA: Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority. 25 June 2014. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
The use of bitcoins as a means of paying for goods and services in Switzerland is not regulated
- Reynolds, Sam. "BITCOIN NOW FOR SALE AT TAIWAN'S FAMILY MART". vrworld.com. VR World Media Hong Kong Ltd. Retrieved 9 July 2015.
- Horwitz, Josh (Oct 28, 2014). "Now you can buy bitcoin along with your snacks and sodas in 3,000 Taiwanese convenience stores". techinasia.com. Tech in Asia. Retrieved 8 July 2015.
Sound complicated? It is. ... As you can see, it’s best suited for folks who have already passed Bitcoin 101.
- Sangwongwanich, Pathom (18 Aug 2014). "Bitcoin firm licensed to trade in baht". bangkokpost.com. Bangkok Post. Retrieved 24 February 2015.
Another bitcoin trading company has emerged as a legally registered entity in Thailand... despite doubts over the legality of the virtual currency.
- Watts, Jake Maxwell (31 July 2013). "Thailand's Bitcoin ban is not quite what it seems". Quartz. Atlantic Media. Retrieved 2 June 2015.
- "Bank of Thailand Says Bitcoin 'Not Illegal' But Warns Against its Use". CoinDesk. 2014-03-18. Retrieved 2016-05-10.
- "Statement of Jennifer Shasky Calvery, Director Financial Crimes Enforcement Network United States Department of the Treasury Before the United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Subcommittee on National Security and International Trade and Finance Subcommittee on Economic Policy". fincen.gov. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. 19 November 2013. Retrieved 1 June 2014.
- "Press release on bitcoins and other virtual currencies". SBV. State Bank of Vietnam. 28 February 2014. Retrieved 28 November 2015.
- Han, Esher (21 August 2014). "Australian Tax Office decides bitcoins are assets, not currency". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 20 August 2015.
- "Tax treatment of crypto-currencies in Australia – specifically bitcoin". Australian Taxation Office (ATO). August 20, 2014. Retrieved October 12, 2014. and "Bitcoin for businesses". Australian Government. Retrieved October 12, 2014.
- "Tax treatment of crypto-currencies in Australia – specifically bitcoin". Australian Taxation Office (ATO). August 20, 2014. Retrieved October 12, 2014.
- "Bitcoin for businesses". Australian Government. Retrieved October 12, 2014.
- "China Bans Financial Companies From Bitcoin Transactions". Bloomberg. 5 December 2013. Retrieved 16 December 2013.
- "Bitcoin's Outlook In China Is Not Looking So Good Right Now". Business Insider. 16 December 2013. Retrieved 16 December 2013.
- "China Bitcoin Exchange CEO: We're Not Giving Up Yet". 19 December 2013. Retrieved 19 December 2013.
- Chao Deng; Lingling Wei (1 April 2014). "China Cracks Down on Bitcoin". WSJ.com. Dow Jones & Company. Retrieved 8 November 2014.
- Kelion, Leo (18 December 2013). "Bitcoin sinks after China restricts yuan exchanges". Technology. BBC. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
- "Metodický pokyn o přístupu povinných osob k digitálním měnám". MFCR. 25 September 2013. Retrieved 16 October 2015.
- "Advarsel mod virtuelle valutaer" [Warning against virtual currencies] (in Danish). Financial Supervisory Authority. December 17, 2013. Archived from the original on December 17, 2013.
- Schwartzkopff, Frances. "Bitcoins Spark Regulatory Crackdown as Denmark Drafts Rules". Retrieved 24 December 2013.
- Martínez Vinueza, Diego; Rivera, Patrícío. "DBCE-0360-2013" (PDF). Banco Central del Ecuador. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
- Ummelas, Ott; Seputyte, Milda (31 January 2014). "Bitcoin 'Ponzi' Concern Sparks Warning From Estonia Bank". BloombergBusiness. Bloomberg. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
- Rahapesu andmebüroo juht Aivar Paul bitcoinidega seonduvast, politsei.ee
- European Central Bank (October 2012). Virtual Currency Schemes (PDF). Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank. ISBN 978-92-899-0862-7. Retrieved 5 March 2014.
- "EBA Opinion on 'virtual currencies" (pdf). European Banking Authority. 4 July 2014. p. 46. Retrieved 8 July 2014.
- "Bitcoin currency exchange not liable for VAT taxes: top EU court". Reuters. 22 October 2015. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
- Bodoni, Stephanie; Thomson, Amy (22 October 2015). "EU's Top Court Rules That Bitcoin Exchange Is Tax-Free". BloombergBusiness. Bloomberg. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
- Joe Stanley-Smith (14 November 2014). "Finland recognises Bitcoin services as VAT exempt". International Tax Review. Retrieved 15 November 2014.
- Clinch, Matt (19 August 2013). "Bitcoin recognized by Germany as 'private money'". CNBC. Retrieved 18 January 2014.
- "比特币不受金管局监管 (Bitcoin is not regulated by HKMA)". Ta Kung Pao. 16 November 2013. Retrieved 18 January 2014.
- "Höftin stöðva viðskipti með Bitcoin (Controls suspend trading in bitcoin)". mbl.is (in Icelandic). Morgunblaðsins. 19 December 2013. Retrieved 19 December 2013.
- "RBI red flags 'virtual currency'". The Times of India. June 28, 2013. Retrieved September 15, 2014.
- "Reserve Bank of India won't regulate virtual currency Bitcoin, yet". The Economic Times. 14 August 2013. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
- "RBI cautions users of Virtual Currencies against Risks". Reserve Bank of India. December 24, 2013. Retrieved September 15, 2014.
- "Reserve Bank warns against Bitcoin use". The Hindu. 24 December 2013. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
- "Bitcoin operators shut shop in India amid RBI warning". The Economic Times. 27 December 2013. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
- "First time in the country, ED raids a Bitcoin seller in Ahmedabad". DNA India. 27 December 2013. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
- "'RBI neither regulates nor supports bitcoins'". The Hindu Business Line. 28 December 2013. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
- Baskoro, FM (21 December 2013). "Bitcoin Finds Itty-Bitty Market in Indonesia". Jakarta Globe. Retrieved 18 January 2014.
- Ryan, Huang (20 January 2014). "Indonesia warns against Bitcoin usage - The central bank said the digital currency was not covered under any regulations, and highlighted the risks involved in transaction security". ZDNet. Archived from the original on 17 September 2015. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
- "BI: Pemakaian bitcoin melanggar Undang-undang! (BI: Bitcoin usage violates the law!)". KONTAN. 16 January 2014. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
- "Pernyataan Bank Indonesia Terkait Bitcoin dan Virtual Currency Lainnya (Bank Indonesia statement on bitcoin and other virtual currencies)". Bank Indonesia. 6 February 2014. Retrieved 7 February 2014.
- "BI Minta Publik Mewaspadai Transaksi Bitcoin (BI requested the public to be careful of Bitcoin transactions)". Tempo (Indonesian magazine). 5 September 2014. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
- "בנק ישראל - הודעות לעיתונות - הודעה לציבור בדבר סיכונים אפשריים הטמונים במטבעות וירטואליים מבוזרים (דוגמת ביטקוין)".
- "בנק ישראל - הודעות לעיתונות - צוות בין-משרדי בנושא מטבעות וירטואליים מבוזרים".
- "Government considers taxing Bitcoin profits". 12 September 2013. Retrieved 26 December 2013.
- "The First Governmental View: Bitcoin is not Currency (in Japanese)". Nikkei Inc. 7 March 2014.
- "Japan eyes treating bitcoins the same as real money". Nikkei Asian Review. The Nikkei. 24 February 2016. Retrieved 28 April 2016.
- Obeidat, Omar (22 February 2014). "Central bank warns against using bitcoin". The Jordan Times.
- Labro, Thierry (22 May 2015). "Monnaies virtuelles: un agrément en six mois". Luxemburger Post. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
- "Bank Negara's Officially Unofficial Statement on Bitcoin is No Statement". Betanomics.asia. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
- "Statement on Bitcoin". Bank Negara Malaysia. 6 January 2014. Retrieved 2 March 2014.
- Fuad, Madiha (6 January 2014). "BNM warns on Bitcoin risks". The Edge (Malaysia). Retrieved 11 January 2014.
- Saleha Mohsin (13 December 2013) Bitcoins Fail Currency Test in Scandinavia’s Richest Nation Bloomberg. Retrieved 13 December 2013
- "MinFin: Bitcoin nie jest nielegalny". Puls Biznesu. 18 December 2013. Retrieved 18 December 2013.
- "Banks closed current accounts for Bitcoin trade" (in Polish). bankier.pl. 27 January 2015. Retrieved 28 January 2015.
- Об использовании при совершении сделок "виртуальных валют", в частности, Биткойн (in Russian). Bank of Russia. 27 January 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
- Hamburger, Ellis (February 9, 2014). "Russia bans Bitcoin use". The Verge. Retrieved February 10, 2014.
- "'You can play with you bitcoins, but you can't pay with them': Russia may ban cryptocurrencies by 2015". Russia Today. September 12, 2014.
- "ru:Биткоины переезжают за границу". ru:Российская Газета. July 18, 2016.
- Irene Tham (2013-09-22). "Bitcoin users beware: MAS | AsiaOne Business". Business.asiaone.com. Retrieved 2013-12-27.
- Terence Lee (2013-12-23). "Singapore government decides not to interfere with Bitcoin". Techinasia.com. Retrieved 2013-12-27.
- Tay, Liz (9 January 2014). "Singaporean Tax Authorities Have Issued Guidance On Bitcoin-Related Sales And Earnings". Business Insider (Australia). Retrieved 11 January 2014.
- "Davčna obravnava poslovanja z virtualno valuto po ZDoh-2 in ZDDPO-2 | Davčna uprava RS" (in Slovenian). Durs.gov.si. 2013-12-23. Retrieved 2013-12-27.
- "Position Paper on Virtual Currencies" (PDF). South African Reserve Bank.
- "한은 "정부 비트코인 규제 만들어라"" [Bank of Korea:"Government Needs to Make Bitcoin Regulation"]. HANKOOKI. December 27, 2013. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
- "Swiss Parliament: Rechtssicherheit für Bitcoin schaffen". Parlament.ch. Retrieved 2013-12-27.
- "Swiss Parliament: Bitcoin and AML". Parlament.ch. Retrieved 2014-04-16.
- "Federal Council report on virtual currencies in response to the Schwaab (13.3687) and Weibel (13.4070) postulates" (PDF). Federal Council (Switzerland). Swiss Confederation. 25 June 2014. Retrieved 28 November 2014.
- 悅嬌, 黃 (6 December 2013). "台灣不瘋比特幣 央行未擬設限 呼籲別炒作 (Taiwan is not crazy about bitcoin. The central bank does not regulate it but the public is advised not to speculate on it)". China Times. Retrieved 18 January 2014.
- Crystal, Hsu (31 December 2013). "Regulators warn against using bitcoins". Taipei Times. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
- Shu, Catherine (5 January 2014). "Taiwan's Government Says No To Bitcoin ATMs". TechCrunch. Retrieved 18 January 2014.
- "FSC vows to keep hands off bitcoin management". Taipei Times. 19 November 2015.
- "FamilyMart Now Accpets BitoEX's Bitcoin Wallet to Buy Goods". Medium.com. 26 October 2015.
- "Press release" (PDF) (Press release). Turkish Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency. 25 November 2013.
- "Tax treatment of activities involving Bitcoin and other similar cryptocurrencies". HM Revenue & Customs.
- SEC v. Trendon T. Shavers and Bitcoin Savings and Trust, 416 (E.D. Tex. 2013).
- Alex Hern (1 July 2014). "Silk Road's legacy 30,000 bitcoin sold at auction to mystery buyers". The Guardian. Retrieved 31 October 2014.
- US Government Accountability Office (May 2013). "Virtual Economies and currencies: Additional IRS guidance could reduce tax compliance risks". GAO Report GAO-13-516. Report to the Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate. Retrieved 6 March 2014.
- IRS (25 March 2014). "IRS Virtual Currency Guidance" (PDF). Notice 2014-21. IRS. Retrieved 30 March 2014.
- Rushe, Dominic (18 November 2013). "Bitcoin hits $700 high as Senate stages hearing on virtual currency". The Guardian. Retrieved 24 November 2013.
- Raskin, Max (18 November 2013). "U.S. Agencies to Say Bitcoins Offer Legitimate Benefits". Bloomberg. Retrieved 24 November 2013.
- Lee, Timothy (23 November 2013). "For Bitcoin, a successful charm offensive on the Hill". Washington Post. Retrieved 24 November 2013.
- Gillum, Jack (2013-04-03). "FEC: Donors can't use bitcoins for contributions". Bigstory.ap.org. Retrieved 2013-12-27.
- "Donate to the campaign | Mark Warden — State Rep". Markwarden.com. Retrieved 9 November 2014.
- Foxhall, Emily (20 December 2013). "Bitcoin donations welcome, Newport Beach City Council candidate says". latimes.com. Retrieved 27 December 2013.
- Goodman, Lee E. (8 May 2014). "FEC Advisory Opinion 2014-02" (PDF). Federal Election Commission. Retrieved 8 May 2014.
- Levinthal, Dave (8 May 2014). "What the FEC's Bitcoin ruling means". Center for Public Integrity. Retrieved 8 May 2014.
- Hattem, Julian (23 May 2014). "Bitcoin gets a lobbyist". The Hill. Retrieved 27 May 2014.
- Dougherty, Carter (20 March 2014). "Gambling Website's Bitcoin-Denominated Stock Draws SEC Inquiry". Bloomberg BusinessWeek.com. Bloomberg LP. Retrieved 13 June 2014.
- "Investor Alert: Bitcoin and Other Virtual Currency-Related Investments". Investor.gov. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Retrieved 13 May 2014.
- "Press Release SEC Charges Bitcoin Entrepreneur With Offering Unregistered Securities". SEC.gov. 3 June 2014. Retrieved 13 June 2014.
- Michael J. Casey (28 October 2014). "Ex-SEC Chairman Levitt to Advise Two Bitcoin Companies". WSJ. Retrieved 27 December 2014.
- Miedema, Douwe (11 March 2014). "U.S. swaps watchdog says considering bitcoin regulation". Reuters.com. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
- Douwe Miedema (12 September 2014). "Bitcoin gets boost as U.S. watchdog approves first swap". Chicago Tribune. Reuters. Retrieved 19 January 2015.
- Cowan, Miles. "Uniform Commercial Code and Bitcoin". We Use Coins. Retrieved 27 November 2014.
- Cosco, Joey (25 June 2014). "Bitcoin Is Actually Illegal In California, But That Could Change Soon". Business Insider. Retrieved 26 June 2014.
- "Bill Text - AB-129 Lawful money.". leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. Retrieved 2016-01-31.
- Peter Schroeder (11 August 2014). "CFPB warns consumers about bitcoin 'Wild West'". The Hill. News Communications, Inc. Retrieved 27 August 2014.
- Nathaniel Popper (7 May 2015). "Bitcoin Exchange Receives First License in New York State". The New York Times. Retrieved 11 May 2015.
- "In the Matter of Virtual Currency Exchanges" (PDF). Public Order. New York State Department of Financial Services. 11 March 2014. Retrieved 30 March 2014.
- Vigna, Paul (17 July 2014). "NY Financial Regulator Releases Draft of 'Bitlicense' for Bitcoin Businesses". WSJ. Dow Jones & Company.