List of video games notable for negative reception
|Part of a series on:|
Certain video games have gained an enduring negative reception, otherwise considered as "bad games", often related to issues such as low-quality or outdated graphics, having many glitches, or having poor controls. Such games are identified through overall low review scores including low aggregate scores on sites such as Metacritic, frequent appearances on "worst games of all time" lists from various publications, or otherwise carry this reputation in analysis by video game journalists or through popular YouTube personalities, such as James Rolfe of the webseries Angry Video Game Nerd.
The list is not comprehensive, but represents the most visible examples of games principally recognized for their enduring negative reception, or in the case of Final Fantasy XIV and No Man's Sky, at their original launch before they were reworked. The list mostly omits licensed tie-in games for movies or television shows, which are generally accepted by the industry as shovelware and not expected to have high production values as they are typically produced by non-AAA development studios. With certain exceptions, this list also omits controversial video games in which the negative reception for those games revolves around the controversies they started and is not related to the quality of the game itself, including those that were subject to review bombing by users for non-gameplay related issues. For similar reasons, the list omits indie games, which are developed by smaller teams that typically lack the ability for full quality control of their product, as well as mobile games, of which there are countless developers with the ability to self-publish on app stores and frequent copycats of more successful games driven by unpopular microtransactions.
Custer's Revenge (1982)
Custer's Revenge is an unlicensed Atari 2600 game made by Mystique in 1982, loosely based on 19th century American General George Armstrong Custer and the Battle of the Little Bighorn. In addition to being widely considered offensive due to its plot involving the apparent rape of a Native American woman, the game was also poorly-received for its quality. It was listed as the most shameful game of all time by GameSpy, as the third-worst game of all time by PC World, and GameTrailers and the ninth-worst game by Seanbaby in Electronic Gaming Monthly.
In 2008, the University of Calgary professor Tom Keenan cited "the hideous Custer's Revenge game", 26 years after its release, in an op-ed piece about current video game violence issues for the Calgary Herald. That same year, the game was credited by Australian PC Magazine as being one of the worst games ever made. In response to the game's criticism, the makers of the game elected to preview the game for women's and Native American groups, an act which some thought was a publicity stunt.
Pac-Man (Atari 2600) (1982)
Pac-Man, a port of the arcade game for the Atari 2600, was altered from the original in order to meet the Atari's limitations. Some of these changes included simplified graphics, a modified maze layout, and "flickering" ghosts—a result of the game rendering one ghost on screen per frame.
In 1998, Next Generation magazine called it the "worst coin-op conversion of all time" and attributed the mass dissatisfaction to its poor quality. In 2006, IGN's Craig Harris echoed similar statements and listed Pac-Man among his own list of the worst home console ports of arcade games. Another IGN editor, Levi Buchanan, described it as a "disastrous port", citing the color scheme and flickering ghosts.
In retrospect, critics often cite Atari's Pac-Man as a major factor in the drop of consumer confidence in the company, which led to the North American video game crash of 1983. Bill Loguidice and Matt Barton of Gamasutra stated that the game's poor quality damaged the company's reputation. Buchanan commented that it disappointed millions of fans and diminished confidence in Atari's games. Former Next Generation editor-in-chief Neil West attributes his longtime skepticism of Atari's quality to the disappointment he had from buying the game as a child. Calling the game the top video game disaster, Buchanan credits Pac-Man as a factor to the downfall of Atari and the industry in the 1980s. Author Steven Kent also attributes the game, along with Atari's E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, to severely damaging the company's reputation and profitability. Montfort and Bogost stated that the game's negative reception seeded mistrust in retailers, which was reinforced by later factors that culminated in the crash.
Poor critical reception made Pac-Man one of many decisions that led to Atari's report of a $536 million loss in 1983 and the division and sale of the company's Consumer Division in 1984. On December 7, 1982, Ray Kassar announced that Atari's revenue forecasts for 1982 were cut from a 50 percent increase over 1981 to a 15 percent increase. Following the announcement, Warner Communications' stock value dropped by around 35 percent—from $54 to $35—amounting to a loss of $1.3 billion in the company's market valuation. Atari attempted to regain its market share by licensing popular arcade games for its consoles. The revenue from selling these console games did not reverse Atari's decline and the company went further into debt.
E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982)
E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial for the Atari 2600 is based on Steven Spielberg's 1982 film of the same name, reputedly coded in just five weeks to be released in time for the 1982 holiday season. The game sold 1.5 million copies and came nowhere near Atari's expectations of five million units. A large number of the cartridges sold were sent back to the company because many consumers found the game to be unenjoyable. Truckloads of these cartridges were buried in a landfill in New Mexico after they failed to sell. E.T. is commonly cited as the catalyst for a crash of the video game industry in 1983, as Atari had hoped that brand loyalty would help keep consumers buying their games regardless of quality.
E.T. was listed as the worst game of all time by PC World in 2006, Electronic Gaming Monthly, and FHM magazine, and was ranked as the second-worst movie game on the "Top Ten Worst Movie Games" (first being Charlie's Angels) by GameTrailers. It was also ranked the second-worst game of all time by GameTrailers, first-worst went to Superman 64. Some considered it so bad that the title screen was the only good part of the game. In 2007, GamePro named E.T. one of the 52 most important games of all time due to its roles in the 1983 video game crash and the downfall of the seemingly unstoppable Atari. It is the only game to make the list for having a negative impact on the video game industry.
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1988)
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is a 1988 side-scrolling action video game developed by Advance Communications and published by Bandai for the Nintendo Entertainment System loosely based on Robert Louis Stevenson's novella Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. Gameplay alternates between the characters of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde based on the player's ability to either avoid or cause damage. While getting decent reviews when released, the game gained largely negative retrospective reviews, with reviewers criticizing bad graphics, confusing gameplay, and poor use of the characters and setting.
Darrell Monti of Nintendo Life called it one of the worst games he got for the NES. In 2004, Game Informer reviewed the game in their Retro Reviews section and gave it a 5 out of 10, ending the review by saying "Flawed on every fundamental level, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is possibly the most unplayable garbage available on the NES." In 2018, the German branch of Eurogamer placed the game at number 8 on their list of top ten worst games of the 1980s. The writers complain that nothing is explained to the player, and that some characters harm the players, but some do not. They called it a frustrating and confusing experience and said: "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde should be played by anyone who wants to learn more about good game design [ . . . ] because this title makes everything so perfectly wrong that you could almost think it was deliberately designed that way." The game was the first to be reviewed on the website Something Awful, gaining a score of −37 on a 0 to −50 scale, with −50 being the worst possible score. Brett Alan Weiss of AllGame declared that the "music and graphics are tolerable, but the controls are sluggish and the action is exceedingly dull, rendering Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde almost unplayable".
Friday the 13th (1989)
Friday the 13th, an adaptation of the popular horror movie franchise developed by Atlus and published by LJN for the Nintendo Entertainment System as part of its "aggressive" expansion into licensed video games, was retroactively criticized primarily for its "broken" and frustrating gameplay.
GamePro listed it as the 10th worst video game adaptation of a film, explaining that "From the start-up screen, Jason's hockey mask sitting alone in the dark, until a knife flies in from above to pierce the empty eye socket, Friday the 13th looks like it will live up to its gory namesake. Unfortunately, what follows is a repetitive music score and amazingly frustrating gameplay, courtesy of LJN."
Action 52 (1991)
Action 52 is an unlicensed multicart developed by Active Enterprises for the Nintendo Entertainment System (NES) in 1991. It contains 52 original games covering various genres, from shoot 'em ups to platformers. Action 52 is one of the most infamous NES games for a number of reasons. The game originally retailed for over US$199 (which equates to four dollars for each game). Many of its games also have poor controls and graphics, and are plagued by bizarre glitches and technical problems; some games are impossible to complete. Kill Screen described all the games as "shit", and Atari HQ called it "really, horribly, incredibly bad." The game frequently appears on lists compiling the worst games ever, and Atari HQ called it the worst game of all time. GameSpy named it the fifth most shameful game ever, summarizing it as an "endless parade of inept programming, repetitive design and outright stupidity." A drastically different version of the game was also developed by FarSight Studios for the Sega Genesis; Hardcore Gaming 101 wrote it was better than the NES version, but "that really isn't saying much."
Night Trap (1992)
Night Trap is an interactive movie video game originally published by Sega for the Sega CD in 1992. It was the first interactive movie released for the system, and had initially received mixed reviews. Critics praised its smooth video animation and humor, but disliked its shallow gameplay. The game became infamous after it was scrutinized during the 1993 United States Senate committee hearings on violence in video games, in which Senator Joe Lieberman claimed Night Trap featured gratuitous violence and promoted sexual aggression against women. The game was removed from store shelves in the United States' two largest toy store chains, Toys "R" Us and Kay-Bee Toys, after both received numerous complaints. After the controversy subsided, Night Trap was ported to multiple platforms, such as the 32X and 3DO. These ports were reviewed more harshly; critics felt the game had not aged well and considered its gameplay dull. Next Generation gave the 32X version a one-star rating and GameFan called it a "so-so game that got a lot more attention than it deserved." Retrospectively, Night Trap was ranked one of the worst video games of all time by Electronic Gaming Monthly, GamesRadar, and Computer Gaming World.
Philips CD-i Legend of Zelda releases (1993–1994)
Prior to the cancelled plans to release a CD-ROM add-on for the Super Nintendo Entertainment System, Nintendo granted Philips licenses to use some of their major characters in games for their Philips CD-i system. In addition to Hotel Mario, Philips released three games in The Legend of Zelda franchise: Link: The Faces of Evil; Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon (both 1993); and Zelda's Adventure (1994), all produced with limited involvement from Nintendo.
The first two games, Faces of Evil and Wand of Gamelon, were developed in tandem by Animation Magic (a Russo-American animation company), using the same game engine, and were released on the same day. Both are side-scrollers where the player has to fight enemies and collect treasure to access certain levels. When first released, the games received some positive reviews; however, critical re-assessment from the 2000s onward has been largely negative. The two games gained notoriety in that decade when attention was brought to their animated cutscenes, which were animated by a Russian studio; in the midst of a review of the Zelda cartoon, an IGN reviewer described the games as being "infamous" and Matthew Castle of Computer and Video Games considered the cutscenes to be "terrifying, rendering Link as a rubbery limbed freak with a face that swims all over his head".
Further criticism was brought to Zelda's Adventure, a third game developed instead by Viridis, which used a top-down approach, and shifted to a live-action visual style with digitized sprites instead of a cartoon look. According to Castle, "what [Zelda's Adventure] lacked in hideous toons it made up for with live-action FMV-visits from a beardy wizard (not a professional actor, but the game's music composer) whose shambolic preamble makes Knightmare look like The Lord of the Rings." It also suffered from poor gameplay, and a glitch preventing the game from playing both music and sound effects at the same time.
Beyond the cutscenes (which soon became popular internet memes alongside Hotel Mario), reviewers at GameTrailers have also ascribed modern negative criticism to "barely functional controls, lackluster gameplay, and numerous bugs". Danny Cowan of 1UP.com noted that Zelda fans "almost universally despise these games". The Wand of Gamelon was ranked the #6 worst video game of all time by Electronic Gaming Monthly and the #5 by GameTrailers.
Hotel Mario (1994)
Philips' deal with Nintendo for the three The Legend of Zelda games also gave them the rights to use characters from the Mario series. The company commissioned several games featuring Mario to be made for the CD-i; however, only one, Hotel Mario, was released. A puzzle game, Hotel Mario features animated cutscenes produced by the same Russian studio behind Link: The Faces of Evil and Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon. The game received primarily mixed reviews upon release; GamePro called the game fun to play, but believed it would bore players and would only appeal to core Mario fans.
Retrospective reviews of the game, however, have been negative, with the game facing criticism for unresponsive controls and the animation of closing doors. IGN, while claiming that Hotel Mario was better than the Zelda CD-i games, slammed the game for being "dull", stating that there was "no reason" for anyone to play it. GamesRadar referred to Hotel Mario as "craptastic" and named it the 48th worst game of all time, while The Guardian called Hotel Mario a "horrible attempt to cash in on the full-motion-video capabilities of the useless CD-i console". Eurogamer claimed the game to be "little more than a really rubbish version of Elevator Action". The game's cutscenes have been subject to much ridicule; IGN compared their quality to that of Microsoft Paint.
Plumbers Don't Wear Ties (1994)
Plumbers Don't Wear Ties was released in 1994 for the 3DO console, along with a limited number of copies for PC. It was advertised as being an interactive, full motion video game; however, besides an opening cutscene, the game's story is presented through static images. The game received negative attention focused on its "surreal" and "sexist" storyline, and poor voice acting. Uproxx's Dan Seitz compared Plumbers Don't Wear Ties to a "Skinemax" movie, and felt that its constant use of still images was the "single saddest attempt to simulate a dream sequence ever". IGN felt that Plumbers Don't Wear Ties was "a symbol for everything that was wrong" with the 3DO's looser licensing program in comparison to the other major consoles (which required publishers to pay a $3 fee per disc), noting that it helped to attract smaller studios whose games "served to strengthen the perception that 3DO's library was riddled with crap". PC Gamer dubbed Plumbers Don't Wear Ties a "shallow, hateful waste of a game, [that] may very well be responsible for having killed the 3DO, interactive fiction, and the whale", naming it #1 on its "Must NOT Buy" list in May 2007. The game has been also cited as one of the primary reasons for the commercial failure of the 3DO game system.
Shaq Fu (1994)
Shaq Fu, a fighting game starring basketball player Shaquille O'Neal, received mixed reviews by critics upon its release, who praised the game's graphical style, smooth animations, and robust gameplay, but criticized the relevance of Shaq's presence in the game, along with its low difficulty and small character sprites. Allgame was similarly critical of the game, criticizing its "sluggish" controls, Shaq being nearly unrecognizable in his in-game sprites, and a "shallow" story mode with "cheesy" dialogue. Despite these mixed reviews, Shaq Fu has remained "collectively detested" by critics and gamers, and a website also exists, named "shaqfu.com," that is solely dedicated to the location and destruction of every copy of Shaq Fu.
Levi Buchanan of IGN argued that Shaq Fu had received ridicule from contemporary critics because of its connections to the phenomena surrounding O'Neal, explaining that "[his] ego had reached such critical mass that it developed its own gravitational pull. And when an ego gets that large, the people that fed the ego to begin with love to turn on it." Buchanan acknowledged some positive aspects of Shaq Fu, such as its graphics and animation, its non-linear story progression, and its "charming" simplicity in comparison to other major fighting game franchises such as Soul and Virtua Fighter, but that it had a "goofy" story and "awful" cast. A sequel, Shaq Fu: A Legend Reborn, was released on June 5, 2018.
Bubsy 3D (1996)
Bubsy 3D, a platform game in the Bubsy series for the PlayStation, was negatively received due to its disorienting camera, poor graphics, sluggish controls, and the titular character's voice clips. Upon release Sushi-X of Electronic Gaming Monthly declared it "my first coaster award", and remarked, "Pretend your controller is filled with mud—this is how Bubsy plays." GamesRadar named it as the video game equivalent to poorly-received films such as Plan 9 from Outer Space and Battlefield Earth. GameTrailers named it their eighth worst video game ever made and referenced it as a rip-off of Super Mario 64, which was released around the same time. Internet reviewer Seanbaby named it his 17th worst game of all time, criticizing its controls, the character's personality and the graphics.
Mortal Kombat Mythologies: Sub-Zero (1997)
Mortal Kombat Mythologies: Sub-Zero, a platform game spin-off of the Mortal Kombat franchise focusing on the main character Sub-Zero, was panned for its poor controls, outdated graphical appearance, and unforgiving gameplay. Its Nintendo 64 port received further criticism for its downgraded quality, including the removal of its full motion video cutscenes. The PlayStation and N64 versions hold aggregate scores on GameRankings of 53.20% and 44.84% respectively.
Mikel Reparaz of GamesRadar opined that while the concept of giving Sub-Zero a spin-off game was interesting based on his popularity, the game "ended up a terrible mess of ugly sprites, cheap deaths and a button you had to hit just to change the direction you were facing, and the less that's said about it, the better." Mortal Kombat Mythologies: Sub-Zero was listed among the worst Mortal Kombat games of all time by IGN.com, whose review noted the game's "dated" graphics, "stiff" character animations, and awkward controls with high input lag.
Midway Games had planned further Mythologies games featuring different characters, but the overwhelmingly negative reception resulted in their cancellation (although Mortal Kombat: Special Forces stemmed from a similar concept).
Based on the show Superman: The Animated Series, Titus Software's Superman for the Nintendo 64 (often referred to as Superman 64) has the player control Superman as he is challenged by his nemesis Lex Luthor to help save the people of Metropolis. Upon release, the game was critically panned for its unnecessary repetitiveness, difficult and confusing objectives, poor controls, numerous glitches that interfere with gameplay, and poor graphics. Notoriously, the game has an introductory ring maze sequence that the player is given no warning about, and has a time limit that leaves nearly no room for error. The ring maze section was exacerbated by the extremely short draw distances covered by distance fog, which is explained in-game as being an aspect of the virtual reality simulation of Metropolis the game is set in, but previously described as "Kryptonite fog" by developers. Titus was harshly criticized for the poor quality of the game. Titus stated that while they had grander plans for the game, "the licensor killed us", and the final game only represents about 10% of what they wanted to include.
Superman was listed as the worst game of all time by GameTrailers, the worst game on a Nintendo platform by Nintendo Power, and as the worst video game adaptation of a comic book by both GameSpy and GameDaily.
Mortal Kombat: Special Forces (2000)
Mortal Kombat: Special Forces is the second action game in the Mortal Kombat franchise released on the PlayStation in 2000 following Mortal Kombat Mythologies: Sub-Zero. However, like Mythologies, it has received negative reviews from critics and fans. It has an averaged review score of only 28/100 at Metacritic, including ratings of 2.1/10 from GameSpot and 3/10 from IGN.
Its sales were so low that Midway placed the series on hold in preparation for Mortal Kombat: Deadly Alliance (2002). Ed Boon stated: "The game had a pretty bumpy development ride and the game didn't turn out very good at all." In 2011, GamesRadar ranked it as the second most absurd Mortal Kombat offshoot (behind Mortal Kombat: Live Tour). In 2013, GamesRadar also ranked it as the 41st worst game made.
The Simpsons Wrestling (2001)
The Simpsons Wrestling is a fighting game based on the animated television series The Simpsons. The game was made for the PlayStation console, was developed by Big Ape Productions, published by Electronic Arts in Europe and Activision in North America and distributed by Fox Interactive. The Simpsons Wrestling received widespread negative reviews from critics; primary criticisms for the game were directed at its simplistic, unbalanced gameplay and bad graphics. It holds an aggregated score of 41.21% on GameRankings and 32/100 on Metacritic. IGN gave the game a 1 out of 10, and declared it "the most horrific demolition of a license ever".
Batman: Dark Tomorrow (2003)
Based on the DC Comics character Batman, Batman: Dark Tomorrow received very negative reviews from critics for its confusing gameplay, repetitive mission modes, awkward camera angles, and the lack of Kevin Conroy's and Mark Hamill's voices. The end of the game was also criticized because there is no direction to the "fulfilling ending" of the story besides using an outside game guide. GameSpot gave the game a score of 2.8 out of 10, while IGN gave it a score of 2.2 out of 10 for the Xbox version and 3.5 out of 10 for the GameCube version. GameRankings gave it a score of 24.06% for the Xbox version and 27.83% for the GameCube version; while Metacritic gave it a score of 25 out of 100 for the Xbox version and 29 out of 100 for the GameCube version. A PlayStation 2 version was planned, but was cancelled due to the game's poor reception. In 2015, GamesRadar named Dark Tomorrow the 18th worst game, claiming the game's camera "makes Epic Mickey's look like cinematography genius".
Tomb Raider: The Angel of Darkness (2003)
Although the graphics and original soundtrack were praised, Tomb Raider: The Angel of Darkness, the sixth instalment in the Tomb Raider series, acting as a direct sequel to Tomb Raider Chronicles and The Last Revelation, received mixed to negative reviews for its poor controls, awful gameplay, and various bugs. IGN's Douglas C. Perry praised its "compelling storyline" and "set of intriguing bit characters", however criticized the game stating that those aspects of the game "pale in comparison to 90% of the PlayStation 2's adventure or action-adventure games, and they actually hurt the rest of the game's best qualities", but that the new moves worked smoothly apart from the stealth actions. He also added multiple examples of good level design, smooth character models, surface textures and lightning, while feeling more mixed about Lara's unrealistic figure and hardened appearance.
Game Revolution's A. A. White stated that while the game's darker story was an improvement compared to its predecessors, it never "[managed] to build to a captivating crescendo", while the reviewer for GamesRadar called it "bountiful but confusing and ultimately of GCSE-standard creative writing." Eurogamer called the controls dated and the stealth mechanics and strength upgrade system unnecessary, while the GamesRadar reviewer cited both the gameplay and control layout as dated, citing the difficulty of effectively controlling Lara at multiple points in the game because of these issues. The camera was also criticized, with gaming outlets citing it as awkward to control and sometimes wayward or confusing during its scripted movements.
In 2010, GameTrailers placed the game 5th in their "Top 10 Worst Sequels" list. The Angel of Darkness caused multiple problems for the Tomb Raider franchise. Paramount Pictures faulted The Cradle of Life's lackluster box office performance on the poor critical reception the video game received from reviewers and fans. The head of Core Design, Jeremy Heath-Smith, resigned after the release of the game, and plans for a sequel called The Lost Dominion, part of a proposed trilogy created using the game's engine, were scrapped. Following the poor performance of both the game and the second movie, Eidos Interactive took the production of Tomb Raider games away from Core Design and assigned them to Crystal Dynamics, noted as the developers of the Legacy of Kain series starting with Legends.
Drake of the 99 Dragons (2003)
Drake of the 99 Dragons holds an aggregate score of 22 on Metacritic, ranking it as the second-worst game for the original Xbox. In 2009, the game was placed as the eleventh worst received game in the last 15 years by GamesRadar. GameSpot's Alex Navarro felt that the game was a "cacophony of terrible effects and voice acting"—noticing the re-use of stock sounds used in AOL Instant Messenger, and comparing the character's voice to a cross between a game show host and the "Moviefone guy". He also felt that due to the game's "disjointed" cutscenes and narration, the storyline was difficult to understand.
IGN's Aaron Boulding gave the game a 2.9 out of 10; while praising the game's unique visual appearance and presentation, along with the "bullet time" audio effects while slowing down time, he concluded that Drake of the 99 Dragons was "a good idea that went horribly astray and ended up disastrous" and that "there's no need to rent, purchase or entertain the thought of playing this one." GameSpot gave the game a lower score of 1.6, considering it "an out-and-out failure in every single discernable category."
Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing (2003)
Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing is a racing game developed and released by Stellar Stone, where the player competes in road races with trailer trucks. Big Rigs became infamous for being released in a pre-alpha state: it lacks any type of collision detection, allowing players to drive through other vehicles and obstacles, and has abnormal physics, including allowing players to drive up a vertical incline or accelerate to a maximum speed of up to 1.23×1037 miles per hour (1.98×1037 kilometres per hour; 5.8×1020 light-years per second) while driving in reverse, then coming to an immediate halt once the accelerator is released. There is no computer artificial intelligence, as computer-controlled vehicles do not move at all during the race, thus making the game impossible to lose. It also has a number of grammatical and typographic errors, most notably the message to the player on finishing a race, "YOU'RE WINNER !".
Big Rigs was listed as one of the worst games ever made by GameSpot and Computer and Video Games, and received the lowest possible scores from both. Additionally after declaring it the "worst game ever made" in a "Games You Should Never Buy" segment, X-Play's Morgan Webb refused to rate Big Rigs as their scale went from only 1 to 5. On aggregate reviews, it has the lowest aggregate score of any video game, with an 8/100 on Metacritic, and 3.83% on GameRankings. Big Rigs was also named #2 as the "Worst Video Game of the Decade". Despite (or possibly due to) the universally negative response by critics, Big Rigs still sold surprisingly well, albeit mostly from discount software bins and at a $5 price point; the actual figures were not released, but GameSpot estimated sales of almost 20,000 copies. Stellar Stone released a patch that addressed a few of the game's complaints, although most problems went unresolved. For example, while artificial intelligence was implemented for the opposing truck, it always stops short of the finish line due to the lack of a losing state being written in the code; as such, the game remains impossible to lose. Big Rigs was originally intended to be released with a game called Midnight Race Club: Supercharged! as a single, combined title. However, GameMill Publishing made the decision to split the project into two games early in production.
Lula 3D (2005)
The adult adventure game Lula 3D was criticized for its tedious gameplay, poor puzzle designs, low-quality graphics (including animations, an inconsistent frame rate, and re-use of character models), its voice acting, the quality of its English translation, and low-brow humor that was too childish for its target audience. On Metacritic, the game received an aggregate score of 28% from 14 reviews. In 2013, Polygon cited Lula 3D and other "low-brow" pornographic games as a factor in the mainstream video game industry's general non-acceptance of adult video games.
Jolt Online Gaming gave Lula 3D a 1.8 out of 10 for making "every mistake that can possibly be made by the designers of a 3D adventure", criticizing its poorly-implemented controls and camera, tedious gameplay involving "mooching around listening to Lula's terribly voiced and poorly translated descriptions of everything around you, while collecting everything you can lay your hands on", and voice actors compared to people auditioning to be a phone sex operator. In conclusion, Jolt felt that "if you like good games, Lula 3D isn't for you. If you like sexual humour, Lula 3D isn't for you. If you have no qualms about pulling yourself off at the sight of dreadfully rendered computer characters shagging, then you need to check yourself in at your local therapy centre."
Eurogamer gave Lula 3D a 2 out of 10, jokingly declaring that its low quality and immature humor (such as the "Bouncin' Boobs Technology" advertised on its packaging) made the game feel like it was developed by and intended for 12-year-old boys. PC Zone gave the game a 3.1 out of 10, believing that it was "oddly compelling", but "so inexorably, mindbogglingly ignorant of how either real games or real sex works that it spread-eagles itself a fair way into the 'so-bad-it's good' category."
Ninjabread Man (2005)
Ninjabread Man, a budget game released by Data Design Interactive and published by Conspiracy Entertainment, was criticized for its poor camera, controls, graphics, and its short length; critics noted that the game could be completed in half an hour. IGN gave Ninjabread Man a 1.5 out of 10, deriding the game for being a "broken mess" and having "just enough character design and gameplay to cover the bullet points on the back of the box", but felt that Ninjabread Man still had a "hilarious concept", and jokingly praised the game for having the best box art of any Wii game. Thunderbolt similarly gave Ninjabread Man a 1 out of 10, also noting that the premise itself had potential, but that the game itself did not have any "glimmer of innovation" and "couldn't be a more of a generic platformer if it tried."
Data Design Interactive was further criticized by both Eurogamer and IGN for releasing several other games, including Anubis II, Myth Makers: Trixie in Toyland and Rock 'n' Roll Adventures, that shared the same overall engine, gameplay, and soundtrack as Ninjabread Man, but with different settings and characters. This, in turn, caused the games to exhibit exactly the same issues as Ninjabread Man. IGN felt that the games were "shovelware at a science" and representative of a bulk, quantity-over-quality approach to video game development. However, IGN still felt that Ninjabread Man had more "appealing" thematics out of the three. Eurogamer gave all four games, including Ninjabread Man, a 1 out of 10, concluding that the games were "dross of the highest order. Rip offs at budget price. We deserve more than this. I've heard people perking up at Ninjabread Man because of its punny name. Don't be fooled."
On Metacritic, Ninjabread Man has an aggregate score of 20 out of 100 from six critic reviews.
Bomberman: Act Zero (2006)
A reimagining of the Bomberman series, Bomberman: Act Zero received negative reception from critics for its long loading times, bad collision detection, forgettable soundtrack, use of the same textures and graphics for every stage, tedious and repetitive gameplay, lack of a save feature, unbalanced A.I. and the series' unwelcome shift to a darker and more futuristic setting. The "First-Person Bomberman" mode was criticized for its bad camera angles and the fact that it is played in a third-person perspective. It holds an average score of 34 from Metacritic. Yahoo! Games' Mike Smith felt that the designers did not understand what made Bomberman great. He criticized its "generic, gritty brushed-metal-and-armor heroes". GamePro's Patrick Shaw felt that it should not be used to introduce players to the series, while fans of the games should skip it. Cracked.com named the game among their "6 Most Baffling Video Game Spinoffs" in 2013, commenting that the developers "took everything fun about Bomberman and made it crazy and depressing."
Sonic the Hedgehog (2006)
Produced to celebrate the franchise's 15th anniversary and relaunch the brand for the next generation, Sonic the Hedgehog was released in late 2006 for the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 and received a very negative response from critics and casual gamers alike for its sensitive controls, poor camera angles, numerous glitches, poor storyline riddled with plot holes, voice acting, extremely lengthy loading times, and level design. However, its visuals and audio were praised. IGN stated that "it offers a few good ideas, and a handful of exciting moments, but none of this helps the game recover from a catastrophic loss in control", while GameSpot lamented the gameplay, the number of glitches, camera problems and the supporting cast, stating "only the most blindly reverent Sonic the Hedgehog fan could possibly squeeze any enjoyment out of Sega's latest adventure". GameTrailers criticized the story as well, by saying that "you might actually be better off reading internet fan fiction." The game was ultimately listed as part of its "Top Ten Disappointments of the Decade" list.
The game has a Metacritic average of 46% for the Xbox 360 version and a similar score of 43% for the PlayStation 3 version. In 2015, GamesRadar named Sonic the Hedgehog the 43rd worst game of all time, noting its "terrible" camera and "downright creepy" story.
GameTrailers and GamesRadar considered Sonic the Hedgehog one of the most disappointing games of 2006. GamesTM singled out the game when it ranked the Sonic franchise at the top of their list of "Video Game Franchises That Lost Their Way". The A.V. Club, Kotaku, Game Informer, and USgamer called the game the worst in the Sonic series, and the staff of GamesRadar named it among the worst video games of all time. The game remains popular for "Let's Play" walkthroughs, with players showing off its glitches. The official Sonic Twitter account also mocks the game. The failure of Sonic the Hedgehog led to the direction of the series being rethought. The next main Sonic game, 2008's Unleashed, ignored the gritty and realistic tone of its predecessor. With Unleashed's sequel Sonic Colors (2010), The A.V. Club wrote, "the series rediscovered its strength for whimsical tales with light tones."
Leisure Suit Larry: Box Office Bust (2009)
Leisure Suit Larry: Box Office Bust, the eighth installment in the Leisure Suit Larry adult-oriented adventure game franchise, was developed by Team17, and published by Codemasters—who acquired the franchise's intellectual property from Activision Blizzard. Box Office Bust was criticized for its poor gameplay and dated graphics, incoherent story, audio and technical issues, voice acting, and poor attempts at adult humor. On Metacritic, the game's PC version holds an aggregate score of 20/100 from 17 critic reviews; its PlayStation 3 port scored lower, with 17/100 based on 11 critic reviews.
IGN declared Box Office Bust to be "frustratingly unpolished, devoid of any kind of wit or charm, and packed with tiring, at times infuriating challenges", also featuring "uncomfortably unfunny dialogue spewed from the lips of entirely unlikable characters". In conclusion, it was explained that "the lowest rating numbers here at IGN are reserved for games with nearly no redeeming qualities or interesting ideas, with next to nothing enjoyable to offer players, and which under no circumstances should be purchased by anyone. Leisure Suit Larry: Box Office Bust is, without a doubt, one of those games."
ScrewAttack, Giant Bomb, and Australian television show Good Game named Leisure Suit Larry: Box Office Bust the worst game of 2009. Al Lowe, creator of Leisure Suit Larry, publicly thanked VU Games on his website for keeping him away from what he called "the latest disaster".
Stalin vs. Martians (2009)
Stalin vs. Martians is a parody real-time strategy video game developed by Black Wing Foundation, Dreamlore and N-Game, released on April 29, 2009. Described as "trashy and over-the-top" by its creators, the game mocks World War II strategy games and utilizes Pythonesque humor. The developers state that Stalin vs. Martians is "obviously a parody, which sometimes gets close to being a satire" and is "halfway to becoming a trash icon of gaming industry for years". In some interviews the lead designer of the game compares Stalin vs. Martians to the Troma films.
Stalin vs. Martians received scathing reviews from critics. It has an average score of 23.41% on GameRankings as well as 25% on Metacritic. GameSpot named it 2009's "Flat-Out Worst Game", awarding it a rating of 1.5/10 and calling it "perhaps the worst RTS game ever created." IGN, which rated the game a 2/10, noted the game's total lack of any RTS-related elements and asked whether it was 'made in 1994 and sealed into a vault until 2009' given how dated the visuals looked. Resolution, awarding the game 35%, warned readers not to purchase the game, but conceded that it is occasionally "incredibly amusing".
Rogue Warrior (2009)
Rogue Warrior was initially developed by Zombie Studios under the title Rogue Warrior: Black Razor: it would have been an Unreal Engine 3-based game with drop-in four-player cooperative play, and 24-player competitive multiplayer using randomly generated maps based on a unique tiling system. However, its publisher Bethesda Softworks was unsatisfied with the direction Zombie Studios was taking with the game; among other issues, citing the lack of emphasis on the personality of its protagonist Richard Marcinko. Bethesda rebooted the project with Rebellion Developments taking over development. The game was re-built from the ground up, scrapping Zombie Studios' work.
Upon its release, Rogue Warrior was panned by critics for its poor controls, frequent use of profanity, short length, very limited multiplayer, and broken combat techniques. GameSpot's Kevin VanOrd awarded Rogue Warrior a 2.0 out of 10, calling it "an absolute rip-off" and finding that Richard Marcinko "doesn't just drop an F-bomb—he drops an entire nuclear warhead of repulsive language." IGN's Jeff Hayes stated that "players should stay far away from this title at all costs" and rated it a 1.4 out of 10, criticizing its "laughable and barely existent" plot. Eurogamer's Richard Leadbetter called it "the worst game I've played on [PlayStation 3 or Xbox 360] for a long, long time."
In 2019, PC Gamer listed Rogue Warrior as being among "the worst PC games of all time", considering it "truly one of the worst first-person shooters in living memory", and akin to "one of those straight-to-video action movies you'd see on a DVD rack in a garage, but somehow dumber."
Final Fantasy XIV (2010)
Final Fantasy XIV is a massive multiplayer online role-playing game (MMORPG) in Square Enix's Final Fantasy series, developed as a spiritual successor to Final Fantasy XI. The game was released for Microsoft Windows on September 30, 2010, with plans for a PlayStation 3 port. However, the initial release of the game was met with poor reviews, with critics describing grind-heavy gameplay, poor controls, and a confusing user interface. The game holds a Metacritic score of 49/100. According to Naoki Yoshida, who took on overseeing the game's remake, the original version of Final Fantasy XIV suffered in production as there had been too much focus on the graphics quality, and little understanding of the fundamentals of a good MMORPG with the expectation that problems could be fixed with updates and patches later.
Shortly after release, then-CEO of Square Enix Yoichi Wada issued an official apology for the quality of the game at the 2011 Tokyo Game Show in December 2011, saying that "the Final Fantasy brand [had] been greatly damaged". The PlayStation 3 port was cancelled, and Square Enix eventually shut off the game's servers on November 11, 2012, as to remake the game from scratch into Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn. Yoshida stated that they felt it was necessary to rebuild the game from the ground up to regain the trust that they lost from fans of the series for the original game, and not strictly as a business decision. The new version was released in August 2013, and was received more positively, with an 83/100 score for the PC version on Metacritic. As of July 2019, the game continues to be supported with expansions and new content for players.
Power Gig: Rise of the SixString (2010)
Released in a market that had already been saturated by rock music-oriented music video games simulating guitar and drums, Power Gig: Rise of the SixString—developed by Seven45 Studios, a subsidiary of mass-market instrument manufacturer First Act—attempted to differentiate itself from competitors such as the Rock Band and Guitar Hero franchises by shipping with an actual electric guitar that could be used in-game, rather than a simplified plastic analog (although existing guitar and drum controllers designed for the franchises could still be used with the game). As opposed to an electronic drum set with physical pads, the game offered an "AirStrike" drum controller, which utilized motion sensors placed on the ground.
Upon its release, Power Gig received negative reviews from critics. The game's guitar was considered low-quality—not performing well as either a controller or standalone instrument, while the AirStrike drum controller was criticized for its poor hit detection, a reliance on proprietary, sensor-equipped drum sticks, and the lack of physical feedback contradicting the game's promoted focus on realism. The gameplay of Power Gig was criticized for being nearly identical to its competitors, even with its dedicated guitar (which only enabled the addition of basic, two-note power chords to songs), and for making little effort in providing any education on the instrument's fundamentals (in contrast to the similar "Pro Guitar" modes of its launch competitor Rock Band 3). Griffin McElroy of Joystiq pointed out that, ironically, despite "[centering] itself around a peripheral which is a real guitar", Power Gig "[settled] for using a new toy to manipulate an old game—but still manages to categorically fail at both." The game was also criticized for its storyline—which IGN declared to be "laughably bad", the exclusion of bass guitar modes, and poor-quality graphics and character animations.
Postal III (2011)
Development of Postal III was subcontracted by Running with Scissors to the Russian video game publisher Akella, who hired the developer Trashmasters. They did not have the resources to develop the game to the design that the series' creators intended and thought they were able to deliver. The game ultimately received poor reviews from critics, scoring an average review score on Metacritic of 24/100. Running with Scissors pulled Postal III from its own online store, calling it an "unfinished mess" and recommending earlier installments of the franchise instead.
PC Gamer gave Postal III a 21/100, joking that "suck and blow" were "two things that Postal III will continue to do for some hours", criticizing its lack of an open world design like Postal 2, poor AI, and poor attempts at being offensive (drawing comparisons to the quality of Uwe Boll's film adaptation). IGN felt that the game's technical and gameplay issues (including long loading times) were more offensive than the game's content, and criticized the lack of variety or openness in its missions. However, the game's humor, wide variety of weapons (despite most of the unique weapons not being as useful in-game as their conventional counterparts), and relatively better graphical quality than Postal 2 were regarded as positive aspects, but not enough to save the game from a 5.5/10 rating. Game Informer gave the game a 1/10, criticizing its "barely cobbled-together series of mostly linear levels", lazily using self-awareness to point out bugs that should have been fixed before release (such as a warning that an escort would "frustratingly disappear" if left behind), and concluding that there was "nothing redeeming about Postal III's frustrating, buggy gameplay." In 2013, Computer and Video Games deemed it one of the 12 worst video games of all time.
FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction (2011)
FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction is a sequel of the FlatOut series, a racing series originally developed by Bugbear Entertainment that features realistic destruction of cars and track obstacles. After releasing FlatOut 2, Bugbear had been tapped by Bandai Namco to develop Ridge Racer Unbounded, and for the third FlatOut game, publisher Strategy First gave development duties to Team6 Game Studios. While Team6 had done numerous racing games prior, their approach to FlatOut 3 significantly changed from how Bugbear approached the title, and FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction was universally panned by critics and fans alike.
The game received generally unfavorable reviews according to the review aggregation website Metacritic. with a score of 23/100. FlatOut 3 is one of the two games Edge has ever given a score of one out of ten to in its history (the other being Kabuki Warriors). Eurogamer also gave it a one out of ten score and criticised all aspects of the game, especially the controls and the AI. It also lamented the fall from grace of the FlatOut series as a whole and summed up the review by saying, "You could go mad trying to rationalise Flatout 3. It is not bad in the way that a game like Boiling Point is bad, where things coalesce into a kind of awful greatness. This is a tacky and technically incompetent production with no redeeming features whatsoever, devoid of fun and an insult to the name it bears. Flatout once burned bright, but now is gone – and if there is a driving hell, this is surely it." GamesMaster also gave the game one out of ten and said, "Some games are so bad they're good (for a laugh, at least). FlatOut 3 is just plain bad." GameSpot gave the game its highest score by giving it five out of ten, praising the Demolition mode and the wide range of game modes, but like in other reviews the AI, controls and the bad collision detection were criticised.
The War Z (2012)
The War Z, an open world multiplayer survival horror game, was publicly released as a "foundation release" in December 2012. The game received negative reception from various publications for its poor gameplay experience, and for its use of microtransactions for purchasing items and reviving characters without waiting four hours, despite the game not being a freemium "free-to-play" game. GameSpy gave The War Z a half-star out of five and considered it "a bad game that deserves all the controversy it's drawn", criticizing the broken state of the game and its use of microtransactions, but complimenting its overall atmosphere and far draw distance. IGN gave the game a 3.0 out of 10, citing that "the high spawn rate of weapons, as well as fear of hackers, makes the majority of player interaction in The War Z overly punishing and one-dimensional", and further criticized its missing features, the ability to lose purchased items, and its lack of a balance between ranged and melee weaponry.
Its developer, Hammerpoint Interactive, was also accused of false advertising by players; since the game's promotional material on Steam at the time highlighted certain features that were not yet present in the game, such as multiple large game worlds varying in size (only one was available), a skill point-based leveling system (which was not yet implemented), servers supporting up to 100 players (that were actually capped at 50), and private servers. Despite this information being corrected to consider them "upcoming" features, the flood of criticism prompted Valve to pull the game from sale on Steam and offer refunds, stating that the game was accidentally made available for purchase prematurely. In an interview with PC Gamer, executive producer Sergey Titov (who was also listed as a producer for Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing) claimed that its servers were temporarily capped at 50 due to player feedback, and that its marketing team had misinterpreted information about the current state of the game. Due to its similar themes, gameplay, and title, some also felt that The War Z was a clone of the popular ARMA 2: Operation Arrowhead mod DayZ (of which a standalone version was in development); on June 20, 2013, Hammerpoint announced that the game would be renamed Infestation: Survivor Stories, "primarily as a result of some confusion and trademark issues with a similarly titled property" (a statement which also factored in a conflict with the film World War Z).
SimCity, developed by Maxis and Electronic Arts (EA), was aimed to augment the normally single-player city-building game with online features that would allow players' cities to interact with one other, building a software platform rather than a single game. The game was released in March 2013, but there was no offline mode, and the servers for online connectivity were over capacity, requiring players to wait upwards of thirty minutes to play for several weeks following launch. EA and Maxis eventually resolved server issues by expanding capacity and disabling certain "non-critical" features. Users also found that promised improvements to the artificial intelligence were not present, and that the available land for city building was much more restrictive than previous iterations. Users were further critical when it was found that the game could be run in an offline mode using special debugging commands, to which Maxis responded saying that they opted against an offline mode as "it didn't fit with our vision". By October 2013, EA and Maxis discussed the possibility of adding an offline mode, and a year after release, the game was updated to support this.
The game received lukewarm reviews from critics, with an aggregate score of 64/100 from Metacritic, but was hit hard with many negative user reviews. The initial server issues created enough negative user reviews at retailer Amazon.com that the retailer temporarily halted sales of the game for a few days. While some users that purchased retail editions of the game were able to get refunds, those that had purchased it digitally through EA's Origin service could not get refunds, and instead EA offered users a choice of one free game from eight offerings as to make up for the server issues. EA was named as the "Worst Company in America" in a 2013 Consumerist user-voted poll, with the debacle over SimCity's service launch as part of the reason some voted this way.
As a result of the poor reception to the game, Electronic Arts shuttered Maxis' main Emeryville, California studio by 2015, transferring Maxis' other franchises like The Sims to other EA studios. Separately, Colossal Order, a studio under Paradox Interactive, had been wanting to make a city simulator for some time, but Paradox had been hesitant of SimCity's influence on the market. Following the failure of SimCity, Paradox greenlit Colossal Order's Cities: Skylines, which was released in 2015. By contrast, Cities: Skylines was critically acclaimed and commercially successful, with some outlets considering the game to have succeeded SimCity as the game most representative of the genre.
Aliens: Colonial Marines (2013)
Aliens: Colonial Marines, a first-person shooter developed by Gearbox Software and set in the universe of the Alien franchise, was criticized at launch for containing bugs, poorly-implemented A.I., unbalanced gameplay, low-quality graphics, and a poorly-implemented co-op mode. A couple of said issues have since been adjusted or fixed to a certain degree. The game's story also drew criticism for its lack of a consistent continuity with the Alien films, despite claims from the developers that the events of the game were supposed to be canon to the film series.
Particular criticism was directed towards discrepancies in the game's quality between pre-release builds demonstrated at events and in promotional materials—the former purporting to feature "actual gameplay", and the final product, including lower graphics quality, missing levels, and other regressions. Shortly after the game's release and the discovery of these regressions, Gearbox CEO Randy Pitchford acknowledged the issues and stated that the studio would look into them. It was reported that, as is common practice, the demo was optimized for high-end PC hardware, and that after the game was returned from its subcontractor TimeGate Studios to Gearbox, the studio made changes to optimize the game's performance for consoles.
In April 2013, a class action lawsuit was filed against Gearbox Software and the game's publisher, Sega. The suit argued that these differences, along with a press embargo on publishing reviews of the final product until its release date, deceived those who pre-ordered the game based on the pre-release promotional materials, amounting to false advertising. In September 2014, Sega agreed to pay a tentative settlement of $1.25 million.
In July 2018, a mod developer reviewing the game's code found that a typo in its configuration files resulted in the poor artificial intelligence shown by the game's enemies observed at its original release; manually correcting the error led to the enemies having more consistent behavior with press material as well as the Aliens from the film franchise.
Ride to Hell: Retribution (2013)
Announced in 2008 as a Grand Theft Auto-styled game set during the late 1960s, the eventual release of Ride to Hell: Retribution in June 2013 was universally panned by critics. In particular, Ride to Hell was criticized for its largely broken gameplay, poorly-implemented controls, poor voice acting and writing, its negative portrayal of women, and for dropping the originally announced open-world format in favor of a linear structure. Daniel Starkey of GameSpot considered Ride to Hell: Retribution to be "painfully insubstantial" and broken all-around, criticizing its plot for showing a "pathetic, out-of-touch approach to sex, violence, and masculinity", and believing that its developers were showing a lack of respect towards players due to the game's abysmal quality. Describing it as the newest candidate for "Worst Game of All Time", Starkey gave Ride to Hell a 1.0 out of 10, making it only the second game (behind Big Rigs) to receive GameSpot's lowest possible rating. EGM described Ride to Hell as being "a linear, insultingly underdeveloped mess" with "endlessly clunky gameplay" and numerous bugs and glitches, concluding that "other games may have offered less content for more money or come up shorter in specific, individual areas, but I don't think there's ever been a game that does so many things so universally poorly", giving the game 0.5 out of 10. In his annual "Top and Bottom 5" awards, Ben "Yahtzee" Croshaw of Zero Punctuation laid out his bottom 5 (in which Ride to Hell was not included) before moving into a coda in which he explained, "I was hesitant to place it even on a worst games list, 'cos it's not a game, it's congealed failure. I speak no hyperbole when I say that releasing every box with no disc inside would have been less of a mistake. So for one time only, I grant the Zero Punctuation Lifetime Achievement Award for Total Abhorrence to Ride to Hell: Retribution, which it will hold indefinitely until a worse game comes along."
The game has a Metacritic score of 19 out of 100, based on 14 reviews of the Xbox 360 version. It is the third lowest scoring game on the Xbox 360, and the lowest scoring retail Xbox 360 game. It received a 13 out of 100 score from Metacritic for the PS3 version, making it the lowest-scoring PS3 game.
Double Dragon II: Wander of the Dragons (2013)
Double Dragon II: Wander of the Dragons is a 3D beat 'em up game loosely based on the arcade version of Double Dragon II: The Revenge, developed by Korean game studio GRAVITY and published by Barunson Creative Co. Ltd. The title was first announced in 2011, but was shelved for release for two years. It was eventually released on April 5, 2013 as a digital download for the Xbox 360 via the Xbox Live Arcade service. It received extremely negative reviews, holding a score of 15.83% on GameRankings (making it the third-worst reviewed game on the site only behind Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing and Ride to Hell: Retribution) and a score of 17 on Metacritic, indicating "overwhelming dislike". GamesRadar ranked it as the 42nd worst game ever made, comparing it unfavorably to the previous Double Dragon Neon. Metro gave it a 1/10 score and called it the "worst game ever".
Dungeon Keeper (2014)
Dungeon Keeper is a freemium MMO strategy video game developed by Mythic Entertainment and published by Electronic Arts for the iOS and Android platforms. It was intended to serve as a reboot of the Dungeon Keeper series directed and designed by Peter Molyneux. The game was heavily panned due to its monetization practices. For example, critics condemned the time the Gem Veins take to dig, which forces players to either wait for varying amounts of time or purchase Gems with real money, practices that were not present in the original Dungeon Keeper games. The Metacritic score for the iOS version is a 42/100. IGN rewarded the game a 3/10, Eurogamer rewarded the game a 1/10, and Metro rewarded the game a 0/10. The game was deemed "unplayable" by some critics. Molyneux criticized the game's monetization implementations as well, describing them as "ridiculous".
The criticisms of the game were exacerbated when Electronic Arts was accused of censoring user ratings lower than five stars by making those players email them instead the next month. The British Advertising Standards Authority soon ruled that Electronic Arts' advertising of the "free" nature of the game misled customers, ordered the creation of fine print explaining the in-app purchases, and banned the original adverts.
Sonic Boom: Rise of Lyric (2014)
Sonic Boom: Rise of Lyric is a 2014 spin-off from the Sonic the Hedgehog franchise developed by Big Red Button Entertainment—a studio co-founded by Naughty Dog alumni E. Daniel Arey and Bob Rafei—and published by Sega for the Wii U. The game was released alongside a tie-in game for the Nintendo 3DS developed by Sanzaru Games known as Sonic Boom: Shattered Crystal. Although both games received generally negative reviews from critics, Rise of Lyric has been heavily derided for its numerous bugs and glitches, poor graphics and level design, over-simplistic gameplay, and bad writing. On Metacritic, the game holds an aggregate score of 32 from 28 critic reviews.
Don Saas of GameSpot noted that "through a combination of unwieldy controls, a broken camera system, and a total lack of responsiveness, the platforming and exploration elements of Rise of Lyric are totally unworkable." Metro GameCentral considered Rise of Lyric to be "definitely the worst game of 2014", citing "a terrible camera, awful controls, unspeakably dull combat, insipid level design, ugly character art, broken graphics, serious bugs, and the terrible feeling that Sega hates both you and Sonic." Both Metro and Nintendo World Report referred to it as potentially the worst Sonic game of all time.
Both games were commercial failures. In February 2015, Sega announced that Rise of Lyric and Shattered Crystal had moved 490,000 units combined, making them the worst-selling games in the history of the franchise. Sanzaru Games has developed another 3DS title known as Sonic Boom: Fire and Ice, which was released in 2016 to mixed reviews, although it was considered an improvement over Rise of Lyric and Shattered Crystal.
Alone in the Dark: Illumination (2015)
The sixth installment in the Alone in the Dark franchise was published by Atari in 2015 centering around a team of four cooperative characters investigating a mysterious figure in a haunted house. Alone in the Dark: Illumination received universally negative reviews. It received an aggregated score of 19% on GameRankings based on 5 reviews and 19/100 on Metacritic based on 12 reviews plus ranked as the worst game of 2015. Jim Sterling stated that Illumination was "ugly in every sense of the word, not just visually – though it is about as attractive as an anus in an eye socket", while criticizing its cooperative play and the mechanic of using light sources to defeat enemies.
Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5 (2015)
A revival of the Tony Hawk's franchise developed by Robomodo, Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5 was panned for its poor quality, especially in comparison to its predecessors, with reviews citing various performance issues, environmental clipping, and physics issues. The game's environments were criticized for their poor aesthetics, unmemorable level themes, small size, dull challenge tasks, and for not containing as many hidden secrets as those in previous Tony Hawk games. Before the game was released, the licensing deal between Activison and Tony Hawk was set to expire. As a result, the game was hastily developed within a few months and released unfinished with little promotion. The nature of the game's online modes were criticized for providing little incentive to players and exacerbating the game's performance issues.
IGN gave the game a 3.5 out of 10, concluding that "Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5's rare moments of nostalgic joy are drowned out by its abundance of poorly thought out levels, control problems, bugs, and its glaring lack of attitude. It boggles the mind that a $60 game in 2015 can be riddled with so many technical issues." Giving Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5 a 3 out of 10, GameSpot argued that "within THPS5 lies a basic skating game that's difficult to enjoy, because you have to jump over numerous hoops and ignore a plethora of obvious issues to find the smallest amount of fun." Polygon named Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5 one of the worst games of 2015, stating that it was "so broken, so garish and so grim that reformed Tony Hawk lovers rue the day they first laid eyes on the franchise. Sometimes, it's better to leave what's past in the past."
Umbrella Corps (2016)
Umbrella Corps is a tactical shooter spinoff of the Resident Evil franchise released for the PlayStation 4 and PC, and has been panned for its poor gameplay mechanics. IGN's Brian Albert rated the game 3.8 out of 10: "[The] balance is absurd, controls are clumsy, and it fails to pull anything meaningful from the Resident Evil universe". Peter Brown of GameSpot rated it 3/10: "Umbrella Corps is a forgettable game dominated by bland action and half-baked mechanics." Zach Furniss of Destructoid lambasted the game as "a broken sludgy mess that fails in just about every way." Game Rant's John Jacques wrote in his review, "The game doesn't know what it wants to be, and as a result, this is another lackluster spinoff from Capcom—one we're eager to forget." Ben Reeves of Game Informer commented, "Thanks to all of its flaws, Umbrella Corps feels like a grotesque online oddity that everyone should just ignore—which everyone is already doing." Cade Onder of GameZone labeled the game "the worst entry in the Resident Evil franchise since 6," citing its "clumsy and even confusing" gameplay. Russ Frushtick of Polygon remarked that "the controls feel like you're walking on ice skates. It's abysmal." In 2017, The Telegraph's Olivia White rated it the worst game in the Resident Evil series, while PC Gamer ranked it the second-worst game in the franchise for its "straight up broken" controls, which they deemed "unforgivable". Umbrella Corps holds a rating of 38 out of 100 on Metacritic, based on 55 reviews.
No Man's Sky (2016)
No Man's Sky was announced in 2013 as a space exploration game that features over 18 quintillion planets in its virtual universe each with their own set of flora and fauna, all formed in-game through procedural generation. The game, developed by a small team from Hello Games, quickly gained significant attention and media hype across the gaming media due to its expansive goals, which was boosted further when Sony announced it would help to publish the game for the PlayStation 4 alongside a Microsoft Windows version. Sean Murray, a co-founder of Hello Games and the lead developer for No Man's Sky, gave numerous interviews over the following years during development, explaining features they had planned for the game including multiplayer.
Just prior to No Man's Sky's August 2016 release, early-released copies revealed that some of the expected gameplay features did not appear present in the game, and were still missing following a day-zero patch. Specifically, there appeared to be no multiplayer, and other features demonstrated in promotional videos and Murray's interviews were absent. Atop this, players found the game lacked a quality of procedural uniqueness (in that there was little overall variation in the planets relative to the scale of the game), and the gameplay elements necessary to explore were tedious. Though Murray had tried to set expectations prior to release, the game received a wide range of reviews and generally negative reviews from players. Negative player reception was compounded by the apparent lack of communication from Hello Games towards these issues, with the team only reporting on bug fixes and performance improvements that they released. Murray later admitted that their initial silence post-release had come about due to drastically underestimating the player size they had to support at the start. Hello Games has since released several major updates to the game to incorporate some of these missing features, including multiplayer modes, as well as other significant additions which have been met with praise, bringing the game to a state that they had expected prior to its launch and grown beyond that. The game is considered a key reminder of what to avoid in marketing a game, with many commentators discussing the proper means to generate interest in games "in a post-No Man's Sky world".
Star Wars Battlefront II (2017)
Star Wars Battlefront II, primarily an online multiplayer shooter, was developed by EA DICE as a sequel to the 2015 game. One element that EA had sought to change was how microtransactions would be handled; the first game offered additional characters and settings through downloadable content, but EA found that this segmented the player community between those who had purchased the additional content and those who had not.
Instead, EA opted to use loot box mechanics (called Star Crates in-game) believing this would help maintain its player community; players could earn Star Crates, containing a random collection of in-game items distributed by rarity, over time by playing the game, but could also spend real-world funds to acquire these. While such loot crates were an established mechanism in video games, the approach used by Battlefront II during its pre-launch beta period was found to be problematic to players. Star Crates not only contained gameplay altering elements, thus seen as "pay-to-win", but also was the fastest way to unlock the more popular Star Wars universe characters rather than grinding them through hours of gameplay. Players and some journalists were vocal about these concerns, which was coupled with general negative attention drawn to loot box mechanics in 2017 from other video games. Just prior to the game's planned launch in November 2017, Disney (who owned the rights to Star Wars) contacted EA over the situation, leading EA to disable any of the microtransaction processes indefinitely until they could work out a solution. The new system was put in place by March 2018, addressing both key concerns.
While Battlefront II received mixed reviews from critics, the negative perception of the game by the player base troubled EA's stockholders, and within a week of its November 2017 release, EA's stock market value dropped by US$3 billion, attributed to the Battlefront II loot box backlash. In its Q4 2017 quarterly financials, EA stated that Battlefront II had missed their sales expectation by at least 10%, which EA's CEO Blake Jorgensen attributed to the player base reaction to how EA had implemented and handled the loot box issue. The attention generated by Battlefront II's loot crates also drew worldwide government and industry responses in late 2017 and beyond to evaluate whether loot box mechanics in video games were a form of gambling particularly to minors and the potential need for regulations.
Fallout 76 (2018)
Fallout 76 is an online action role-playing game in the Fallout series. Developed by Bethesda Game Studios, Fallout 76 represented the studio's first foray for a fully online game, as well as the first time multiplayer is included in a Fallout game developed by Bethesda Studios. Fallout 76's Metacritic scores across PC, PlayStation 4, and Xbox One platforms have an average of about 51/100, with user reviews being far more critical of the game.
The game shipped with a large number of bugs and glitches, and Bethesda's early patches to fix these were large and at times, reintroduced bugs that had previously been fixed. Other complaints from players focused on the expensive pricing of in-game cosmetics, as well as introducing items that gave gameplay advantages which could similarly be bought with real money. Additionally, there was criticism for Bethesda's attitude towards players using mods, regardless of whether their intentions were harmful or not, as well as the game's lack of sufficient anti-cheat protection due to large-scale examples of hacking. Like No Man's Sky, Bethesda had not been as communicative of its efforts to improve the game following release, leading to further consternation within the player base.
The choice to include a premium subscription service in October 2019 was met with criticism as players had expected some of the exclusive features to have been provided for free. The service was also hampered by bugs upon release, including one that deleted all items from the Scrapbox, an item "Fallout 1st" players receive that allows unlimited storage of building materials. Bethesda has since addressed those bugs and gave any players thought to be affected by the Scrapbox bug free in-game materials as an apology.
Several promotional facets of Fallout 76 failed to meet original expectations. As part of the game's premium physical content, the promotional canvas bag and an alcoholic beverage bottle were found to not match the original product descriptions as shipped, while thousands of Fallout-themed helmets were recalled due to containing dangerous levels of mold.
By 2020, Bethesda's work to improve the game has garnered more positive praise from its users. On its release to Steam in April of that year, its users worked to fight a review bomb by posting positive reviews and experiences of the game since release.
Warcraft III: Reforged (2020)
Warcraft III: Reforged is a remastered edition of the 2002 real-time strategy video game Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos and its expansion Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne, and was developed and published by Blizzard Entertainment and released on January 28, 2020. The game was released as an update to the existing Warcraft III product on Battle.net: purchasing the Reforged update provided new character models and other improved graphic features, but most other engine changes were patched over the original Warcraft III for all owners of this product. Although the game received mixed reviews from critics, upon launch, the game received negative reviews from fans for its instability and missing features that had been in Warcraft III originally such as leaderboards and clan support, and promised features such as remade cut scenes which were advertised as part of the game's marketing. Those that had not purchased Reforged were also upset at losing original features with the forced update. The game was "overwhelmingly disliked" according to user reviews on review aggregator Metacritic and received the lowest user score of any game on the site. Blizzard offered a no-questions-asked refund policy for users disappointed with the updates and promised that they would work to address player issues.
- List of commercial failures in video gaming
- List of best-selling video games
- List of video games considered the best
- List of video games notable for development hell
- List of controversial video games
- Scott-Jones, Richard (March 22, 2017). Rare adult adventure game, Plumbers Don't Wear Ties, is unearthed to everyone's regret. PCGamesN. Retrieved March 22, 2017.
- Cassidy, William. "Top Ten Shameful Games". GameSpy.com. IGN Entertainment. Archived from the original on April 16, 2009. Retrieved September 17, 2014.
- Townsend, Emru (October 23, 2006). "The 10 Worst Games of All Time". PCWorld. Retrieved May 23, 2017.
- "Top 10 Best and Worst Games of All Time". GameTrailers Archive. November 17, 2006.
- "EGM's Crapstravaganza: The 20 Worst Games of All Time". Retrieved May 23, 2017 – via Seanbaby.com.
- "Teaching kids to kill". Canada.com. Retrieved November 17, 2013.
- "Violent video games – the worst of the worst". News. PC & Tech Authority. April 10, 2008. Retrieved November 17, 2013.
- Wise, Deborah (1982). "Video-pornography games cause protest". InfoWorld (November 8): 1,7.
- "What the hell happened?". Next Generation. Imagine Media. April 1998. p. 47.
- Harris, Craig (June 27, 2006). "Top 10 Tuesday: Worst Coin-op Conversions". IGN. Retrieved July 15, 2009.
- Buchanan, Levi (August 26, 2008). "Top 10 Best-Selling Atari 2600 Games". IGN. Retrieved July 15, 2009.
- Barton, Matt; Loguidice, Bill (February 28, 2008). "A History of Gaming Platforms: Atari 2600 Video Computer System/VCS". Gamasutra. Retrieved July 15, 2009.
- Buchanan, Levi (August 26, 2008). "Top 10 Best-Selling Atari 2600 Games". IGN. Retrieved July 15, 2009.
- Buchanan, Levi (November 26, 2008). "Top 10 Videogame Turkeys". IGN. Retrieved July 15, 2009.
- Kent, Steven (2001). "The Fall". The Ultimate History of Video Games. Three Rivers Press. pp. 237–239. ISBN 0-7615-3643-4.
- Montfort, Nick; Bogost, Ian (2009). "Pac-Man". Racing the Beam: The Atari Video Computer System. MIT Press. pp. 66–79. ISBN 978-0-262-01257-7.
- Staff. "Five Million E.T. Pieces". Snopes.com. Retrieved October 9, 2009.
- Staff (December 2004). "This Month in Gaming History". Game Informer. No. 140. GameStop. p. 202.
- Taylor, Alexander L.; Thompson, Dick; Washburn, Susanne (December 20, 1982). "Pac-Man Finally Meets His Match". Time. Time Inc. Retrieved September 30, 2009.
- "Five Million E.T. Pieces". Snopes. February 2, 2007. Retrieved February 12, 2009.
- "The 30 defining moments in gaming". Edge Online. Next-Gen.biz. August 13, 2007. Archived from the original on December 16, 2007. Retrieved January 31, 2008.
- Hilliard, Kyle (April 26, 2014). "E.T. Atari Cartridge Landfill Excavation Uncovers Fabled Cache". Game Informer. Retrieved April 26, 2014.
- Wayback Machine
- Parish, Jeremy. "The Most Important Games Ever Made: #13: E.T." 1UP.com. Archived from the original on July 7, 2012. Retrieved July 1, 2006.
- Fatt, Boba (March 1, 2009). "Feature : The 52 Most Important Video Games of All Time [International] - from GamePro.com". Archived from the original on March 1, 2009. Retrieved May 23, 2017.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
- Seanbaby. "Seanbaby.com – EGM's Crapstravaganza: The 20 Worst Games of All Time". Archived from the original on September 11, 2013. Retrieved May 23, 2017.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
- "The Video Game Revolution: Best and Worst Games of All Time". PBS. Retrieved May 23, 2017.
- "Gametrailers.com – GT Countdown – Top Ten Worst Movie Games". Archived from the original on March 22, 2009. Retrieved May 24, 2017.
- Fragmaster. "Game of the Week: E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial". Classic Gaming. GameSpy. Archived from the original on January 9, 2014. Retrieved June 29, 2006.
- "Features: Staff NES Stories – Nintendo Life". Nintendo Life. September 27, 2018. Retrieved May 21, 2019.
- "Retro Review: Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde". Game Informer. May 2004.
- Eurogamer-Team (August 16, 2018). "Katastrophen-Gaming: Die 10 schlechtesten Spiele der 80er". Eurogamer.de (in German). Retrieved May 21, 2019.
- "Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde". Something Awful. October 22, 2013. Retrieved May 21, 2019.
- Weiss, Brett Alan. "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde – Review – allgame". Allgame. Archived from the original on November 16, 2014.
- Steinbock, Dan (1995). Triumph and erosion in the American media and entertainment industries (1. publ. ed.). Westport, Conn. [u.a.]: Quorum Books. ISBN 9780899309149.
- "10 to 1: The Worst Movie Games Ever". GamePro. July 2, 2004. Archived from the original on May 24, 2010. Retrieved May 22, 2015.
- "Action 52". Hardcore Gaming 101. Summer 2008. Retrieved June 16, 2018.
- Cassidy, William (December 31, 2002). "Top Ten Shameful Games". GameSpy. Archived from the original on March 24, 2010. Retrieved June 16, 2018.
- "I'm Not Kidding This Game is S**t". Kill Screen. Retrieved June 16, 2018.
- "Action 52". Atari HQ. Retrieved June 16, 2018.
- "Night Trap". Sega Force (18): 64–66. June 1993.
- "Night Trap". Mean Machines Sega (7): 60–63. April 1993.
- "Video Game Violence". C-SPAN.org. Archived from the original on May 8, 2017. Retrieved May 7, 2017.
- "Major Stores Pull Night Trap". GamePro (56). IDG. March 1994. p. 184.
- "32X Ratings: Night Trap". Next Generation. No. 5. May 1995. p. 91.
- "Night Trap". GameFan. Vol. 2 no. 3. February 1994. pp. 19, 110.
- "EGM's Crapstravaganza: The 20 Worst Games of All Time (#12: Night Trap)". Seanbaby.com. Archived from the original on June 5, 2002. Retrieved July 21, 2017.
- "The 100 worst games of all time". GamesRadar. May 1, 2015. Archived from the original on July 2, 2014. Retrieved May 5, 2015.
- Staff (November 1996). "150 Best (and 50 Worst) Games of All Time" (PDF). Computer Gaming World. No. 148. p. 88. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 11, 2013. Retrieved July 11, 2017.
- "The Legend of Zelda Retrospective Zelda Retrospective Part 3". GameTrailers Archive. October 22, 2006. Retrieved April 7, 2008 – via YouTube.
- "Feature: History Lesson: Zelda CD-i – CVG US". March 25, 2014. Archived from the original on March 25, 2014. Retrieved October 11, 2018.
- Rice, Chris, ed. NEWS: ZELDA CDi EXCLUSIVE. SNES Force. Issue 1. Pg.7. July 1993.
- CD TESTS: Link The Faces of Evil. Joystick. No.44. Pg.192. December 1993.
- Drucker, Michael S. (September 30, 2005). "The Legend of Zelda: The Complete Animated Series – DVD Review at IGN". IGN. Retrieved May 14, 2010.
- Cowan, Danny (April 25, 2006). "CDi: The Ugly Duckling". 1UP.com. Archived from the original on July 20, 2012. Retrieved April 7, 2008.
- The Legendarily Awful CD-i ‘Zelda’ Games Redone In 3-D Is Trippy Required Viewing — UPROXX
- "EGM's Crapstravaganza: The 20 Worst Games of All Time". Seanbaby.com. Archived from the original on January 16, 2013. Retrieved August 21, 2009.
- 8 Mario Games Released On Non-Nintendo Platforms - IGN
- Lawrence of Arcadia (September 1994). "ProReview: CD-i". GamePro. Vol. 62 no. 9. IDG Communications. p. 108.
- "The Other Mario Games, Vol. 3". IGN. Retrieved October 18, 2016.
- Reparaz, Mikel. "The 10 worst game intros of all time". GamesRadar. Retrieved October 18, 2016.
- "The 100 worst games of all time". GamesRadar. Retrieved October 18, 2016.
- "The 30 worst video games ofall time- Part 1". The Guardian. Retrieved October 18, 2016.
- Whitehead, Dan (March 9, 2007). "The History of Mario". Eurogamer. Retrieved June 21, 2008.
- "Thought lost forever, one of the worst PC games ever has been found". PC Gamer. Retrieved August 18, 2017.
- Seitz, Dan (July 18, 2010). ""Plumbers Don't Wear Ties": Gaming's First (and Only) Surrealist Softcore Adventure". Uproxx. Archived from the original on February 14, 2012. Retrieved November 12, 2011.
- "Die, 16-bit, Die! The mad dash to crush gaming's greatest generation". IGN. Retrieved September 6, 2012.
- "PC Gamer's Must NOT Buy". PC Gamer. Retrieved September 6, 2012.
- "In Defense of Shaq Fu". IGN.com. Retrieved September 17, 2014.
- "Shaq Fu: What Did Critics Say Back in 1994?". DefunctGames.com. Retrieved September 17, 2014.
- "Shaq Fu review". Allgame. All Media Network. Retrieved September 17, 2014.
- "Crowdfunding's latest celebrity success: Shaq". CNBC.com. Retrieved September 17, 2014.
- "Shaq Fu: A Legend Reborn launches June 5". Gematsu.com. Retrieved December 13, 2018.
- "Review Crew: Bubsy 3D". Electronic Gaming Monthly. No. 89. Ziff Davis. December 1996. p. 88.
- Goulter, Tom. "Gaming's would-be innovators". GamesRader. Future US, Inc. Retrieved April 7, 2011.
- "Top Ten Best and Worst Games of All Time". GameTrailers. November 17, 2006. Retrieved April 7, 2011.
- Seanbaby. "EGM's Crapstravaganza: The 20 Worst Games of All Time". Archived from the original on June 6, 2002. Retrieved April 7, 2011.
- "Mortal Kombat Mythologies: Sub Zero Review". Game Revolution. Retrieved May 22, 2015.
- "Mortal Kombat Mythologies: Sub Zero". IGN.com. October 1, 1997. Retrieved September 25, 2012.
- Gerstmann, Jeff (February 3, 1998). "Mortal Kombat Mythologies: Sub Zero Review". GameSpot. Archived from the original on June 29, 2013. Retrieved June 29, 2013.
- "Review Crew: MK Myth.: Sub-Zero". Electronic Gaming Monthly. No. 103. Ziff Davis. February 1998. p. 105.
While I somewhat enjoyed the PlayStation version, I detested the N64 mockery. The cool cut scenes are completely missing, replaced by static screens that look like Super NES rejects. ... It has nothing that made the PlayStation version work for me. The sound and music aren't nearly as crisp and moving on the N64.
- Casamassina, Matt (December 8, 1997). "Mortal Kombat Mythologies: Sub-Zero". IGN. Retrieved April 27, 2020.
- "Mortal Kombat Mythologies: Sub-Zero for PlayStation". GameRankings. Retrieved May 22, 2015.
- "Mortal Kombat Mythologies: Sub-Zero for Nintendo 64 – GameRankings". GameRankings. Retrieved May 22, 2015.
- Reparaz, Mikel (April 13, 2011). "The evolution of Scorpion and Sub-Zero". GamesRadar.
- Hatfield, Daemon (March 29, 2011). "The Best (And Worst) Mortal Kombat Games".
- Hatfield, Daemon (May 5, 2011). "The History of Mortal Kombat".
- Fielder, Joe (May 31, 1999). "Superman Review, Superman Nintendo 64 Review - GameSpot.com". Archived from the original on May 25, 2011. Retrieved May 23, 2017.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
- "Superman". IGN. June 2, 1999. Retrieved May 23, 2017.
- "Superman Review". Game Revolution. July 1, 1999. Retrieved May 23, 2017.
- "The 30 worst video games of all time – part two". The Guardian. October 16, 2015. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
- "Top 5 Worst Games Ever". Nintendo Power. No. 196. 2005.
- "Comics to Consoles: Part II – When Good Comics Go Bad – Page 1". GameSpy. Retrieved May 23, 2017.
- "Top 25 Worst Comic Book Video Games Gallery and Images – GameDaily". Archived from the original on March 11, 2009. Retrieved May 23, 2017.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
- "The Convoluted, Blood-Spattered History of Mortal Kombat (Infographic)". GameFront. April 15, 2011. Archived from the original on April 23, 2016. Retrieved February 6, 2014.
- "Mortal Kombat: Special Forces for PlayStation Reviews". Metacritic. Retrieved February 6, 2014.
- Walk, Gary (November 17, 2008). "Interview: Ed Boon on the Ups and Downs of the Mortal Kombat Franchise". GameDaily. Retrieved September 20, 2009.
- Chris Antista, The Top 7… Most absurd Mortal Kombat offshoots, GamesRadar, April 12, 2011.
- "The 50 worst games of all time". GamesRadar. April 15, 2013. Retrieved December 5, 2013.
- "The Simpsons Wrestling". GameRankings. Retrieved January 19, 2015.
- "The Simpsons Wrestling". Metacritic. Retrieved January 19, 2015.
- "Simpsons Wrestling". IGN. Retrieved January 19, 2015.
- Tracy, Tim (April 2, 2003). "Batman: Dark Tomorrow Review". GameSpot. Retrieved November 22, 2013.
- Goldstein, Hilary (March 24, 2003). "Batman: Dark Tomorrow Review". IGN. Retrieved November 22, 2013.
- Lewis, Cory D. (March 25, 2003). "Batman: Dark Tomorrow (GC)". IGN. Retrieved November 22, 2013.
- "Batman: Dark Tomorrow for Xbox". GameRankings. Retrieved November 22, 2013.
- "Batman: Dark Tomorrow for GameCube". GameRankings. Retrieved November 22, 2013.
- "Batman: Dark Tomorrow Critic Reviews for Xbox". Metacritic. Retrieved November 22, 2013.
- "Batman: Dark Tomorrow Critic Reviews for GameCube". Metacritic. Retrieved November 22, 2013.
- "Batman: Dark Tomorrow (PlayStation 2)". ign.com. Retrieved February 17, 2017.
- "The 100 worst games of all time (page 9)". GamesRadar. Archived from the original on February 23, 2017. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
- Reed, Kristan (June 25, 2003). "Tomb Raider: Angel of Darkness Review • Reviews • PlayStation 2". Eurogamer. Retrieved July 6, 2012.
- White, A. A. (July 1, 2003). "Tomb Raider: Angel of Darkness Review". Game Revolution. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
- Perry, Douglas C. (June 24, 2003). "Tomb Raider: The Angel of Darkness – PlayStation 2 Review at IGN". IGN. Retrieved July 6, 2012.
- Perry, Douglas C. (June 10, 2003). "Tomb Raider: Angel of Darkness Review – PC Review at IGN". IGN. Retrieved July 6, 2012.
- Reparaz, Mikel. "The 10 worst game intros of all time". GamesRadar. Retrieved October 5, 2008.
- Kasavin, Greg (June 20, 2003). "Tomb Raider: The Angel of Darkness PS2 Review". GameSpot.com. Retrieved July 6, 2012.
- "Top 10 Worst Sequels". GameTrailers Archive. December 13, 2010. Retrieved November 4, 2015.
- Susman, Gary (July 29, 2003). "Blame Game". EW.com. Retrieved July 6, 2012.
- Marshall, Rick (March 9, 2013). "History of Tomb Raider: Blowing the dust off 17 years of Lara Croft". Digital Trends. Retrieved November 11, 2013.
- Fox, Fennec (July 15, 2003). "Tomb Raider Co-Creator Steps Down". GamePro.com. Archived from the original on January 23, 2008. Retrieved July 1, 2009.
- The Complete Official Guide to Tomb Raider Legend. Piggyback Interactive. May 1, 2006. p. 179. ISBN 1-903511-81-X.
- "Lara leaves UK". BBC News. July 31, 2003. Retrieved January 6, 2013.
- Staff (November 2003). "The Next Tomb Raider". PlayStation Magazine. US Imagine Publishing (77): 57–60.
- "Drake of the 99 Dragons Critic Reviews for Xbox". Metacritic. Retrieved March 17, 2013.
- Charlie Barratt (July 28, 2009). "The 15 worst-reviewed games of the past 15 years". GamesRadar.
- "Drake of the 99 Dragons Review". GameSpot. Retrieved September 10, 2014.
- "Drake: Interesting premise and style are totally betrayed by shoddy control and design". IGN.com. Retrieved September 10, 2014.
- Navarro, Alex (November 20, 2003). "Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing Review, Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing PC Review - GameSpot.com". Archived from the original on November 5, 2011. Retrieved May 23, 2017.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
- "The 12 worst games of all time". Computer and Video Games. Future PLC.
- Satterfield, Shane (March 23, 2004). "Games You Should Never Buy". G4TV. X-Play. Archived from the original on April 6, 2005. Retrieved May 31, 2009.
- "Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing for PC". Metacritic. Retrieved March 21, 2011.
- "Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing". GameRankings. Retrieved March 21, 2011."All-Time Worst". Gamerankings.com. Retrieved March 21, 2011.
- "SAGY Awards 2009 Worst Game of the Decade Winner | ScrewAttack – Metal Gear Ben Finale LATER TODAY!". ScrewAttack. Archived from the original on February 27, 2010. Retrieved May 14, 2010.
- "Best of 2004 – GameSpot". Archived from the original on March 19, 2013. Retrieved May 23, 2017.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
- "Big Rigs:Over the Road Racing v1.0 Patch". GameSpot. January 15, 2004. Archived from the original on June 9, 2009. Retrieved May 31, 2009.
- "Q and A with Sergey Titov, CEO of TS Group". yourewinner.com. September 21, 2008. Archived from the original on February 1, 2014.
- "Review: Lula 3D (PC)". Jolt Online Gaming. Archived from the original on February 18, 2008. Retrieved December 21, 2013.
- "Lula 3D: A bunch of arse that should be left on the top shelf". PC Zone. Retrieved December 20, 2013.
- "Lula 3D review". Eurogamer. Retrieved December 20, 2013.
- "Lula 3D (pc) reviews". Metacritic. Archived from the original on July 6, 2008. Retrieved January 31, 2011.
- "A history of (muted) violence". Polygon. Vox Media. Retrieved March 22, 2014.
- Bozon, Mark (January 8, 2008). "Ninjabread Man Review". IGN. Archived from the original on March 29, 2010. Retrieved July 15, 2010.
- Morton, Philip (January 6, 2008). "Ninjabread Man Wii review". Thunderbolt. Retrieved July 15, 2010.
- "Popcorn Arcade Roundup: Salty, not sweet". Eurogamer. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
- "Myth Makers: Trixie in Toyland Review". IGN. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
- "Ninjabread Man – Wii". Metacritic. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
- "Bomberman: Act Zero". Metacritic. Retrieved December 20, 2013.
- Smith, Matt (August 29, 2006). "Bomberman: Act Zero". Yahoo! Games. Archived from the original on January 6, 2010. Retrieved May 9, 2014.
- Shaw, Patrick (September 14, 2006). "Review : Bomberman Act: Zero". GamePro. Archived from the original on June 7, 2011. Retrieved September 16, 2009.
- Snipes, Chris (January 2, 2013). "The 6 Most Baffling Video Game Spinoffs". Cracked.com. Retrieved February 7, 2016.
- "Sonic the Hedgehog – Xbox 360". IGN Australia. March 15, 2007. Retrieved March 11, 2013.
- "Sonic the Hedgehog Review". GameSpot Australia. November 30, 2006. Archived from the original on February 16, 2013. Retrieved March 11, 2013.
- "GT Countdown Video – Top 10 Disappointments of the Decade". GameTrailers Archive. Retrieved March 11, 2013.
- "Sonic the Hedgehog for Xbox 360 Reviews". Metacritic. November 14, 2006. Retrieved March 11, 2013.
- "Sonic the Hedgehog for PlayStation 3 Reviews". Metacritic. January 30, 2007. Retrieved March 11, 2013.
- "The 100 Worst Video Games of All Time (page 6)". GamesRadar+. Archived from the original on February 2, 2017. Retrieved January 26, 2017.
- "GamesRadar's Anti-awards 2006". GamesRadar. Future Publishing. January 17, 2017. p. 17. Archived from the original on September 17, 2016. Retrieved March 22, 2017.
- "Top 10 Disappointments of the Decade". GameTrailers. May 19, 2016. Archived from the original on April 7, 2017. Retrieved September 22, 2017.
- "10 Videogame Franchies that Lost their Way". GamesTM. No. 90. Imagine Publishing. November 2009. pp. 156–7.
- Lee, Patrick (June 23, 2016). "The best, worst, and weirdest games from 25 years of Sonic The Hedgehog". The A.V. Club. The Onion. Archived from the original on January 17, 2017. Retrieved May 31, 2017.
- Fahey, Mike (November 15, 2016). "Ten Years Ago Sonic The Hedgehog Was At Its Worst". Kotaku Australia. Gawker Media. Archived from the original on November 17, 2016. Retrieved March 18, 2017.
- Reiner, Andrew (March 12, 2017). "Super Replay – The Worst Sonic The Hedgehog Ever". Game Informer. GameStop. Archived from the original on March 13, 2017. Retrieved March 13, 2017.
- USgamer Team (August 18, 2017). "Gotta Go Fast: Ranking All of The Sonic The Hedgehog Games". USgamer. Gamer Network. Archived from the original on August 21, 2017. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
- "The 100 worst games of all time". GamesRadar. Future Publishing. December 2, 2015. Archived from the original on February 2, 2017. Retrieved May 31, 2017.
- Onyett, Charles (May 12, 2009). "Leisure Suit Larry: Box Office Bust Review". IGN. Retrieved June 16, 2010.
- "Leisure Suit Larry: Box Office Bust for PC". Metacritic. Retrieved March 21, 2011.
- "Leisure Suit Larry: Box Office Bust for Playstation 3". Metacritic. Retrieved March 21, 2011.
- Farmhouse (April 20, 2010). "Leisure Suit Lary (Box Office Bust) makes me throw up!". ScrewAttack.com. Archived from the original on July 21, 2011. Retrieved March 21, 2011.
- Giantbomb Staff (December 29, 2009). "Giant Bomb's Game of the Year 2009, Day Three". Giant Bomb. Retrieved November 14, 2012.
- "GG Awards 2009: Worst Game". Good Game. December 14, 2009. Retrieved March 21, 2011.
- "Leisure Suit Larry: Box Office Bust". allowe.com. Retrieved June 16, 2010.
- "IGN: Stalin vs. Martians Announced".
- "Paradox Interactive press release". Archived from the original on September 21, 2009. Retrieved March 20, 2009.
- Phill Cameron. "Gamasutra – Interview: All Hail Stalinator! Inside Stalin Vs. Martians".
- Stegerwald, Kyle (May 18, 2009). "2404 – PC Gaming – Stalin vs. Martians Interview". Archived from the original on July 3, 2010. Retrieved May 24, 2017.
- "Stalin vs. Martians Review". Gamespot. Archived from the original on October 11, 2012.
- "Stalin Vs. Martians Review". IGN.
- "Stalin vs. Martians – Resolution Magazine". Archived from the original on June 4, 2009. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
- Ogden, Gavin (October 30, 2006). "Bethesda creates new first-person shooter". Computer and Video Games. Retrieved July 20, 2009.
- Crecente, Brian (April 27, 2009). "Rogue Warrior Carpet F-Bombs With Rourke". Kotaku. Retrieved December 31, 2012.
- VanOrd, Kevin (December 4, 2009). "Rogue Warrior Review". GameSpot. Archived from the original on June 22, 2012. Retrieved December 31, 2012.
- Hayes, Jeff (December 4, 2009). "Rogue Warrior Review". IGN. Retrieved December 31, 2012.
- Leadbetter, Richard (December 4, 2009). "Rogue Warrior Review". Eurogamer. Retrieved December 31, 2012.
- Kelly, Andy; Senior, Tom (June 25, 2019). "22 of the worst PC games of all time". PC Gamer. Retrieved April 8, 2020.
- Senior, Tom (October 18, 2010). "Final Fantasy XIV review". PC Gamer. Archived from the original on August 10, 2015. Retrieved October 20, 2010.
- Manion, Rory (October 11, 2010). "Final Fantasy XIV Review". GameSpy. Archived from the original on December 7, 2014. Retrieved October 20, 2010.
- "Final Fantasy XIV Online for PC". Metacritic. Archived from the original on June 7, 2015. Retrieved July 5, 2012.
- Nutt, Christian (April 18, 2014). "Understanding the successful relaunch of Final Fantasy XIV". Gamasutra. Retrieved August 5, 2019.
- Gantayat, Anoop (September 27, 2011). "Square Enix CEO: Final Fantasy XIV Damaged FF Brand". Andriasang. Archived from the original on December 25, 2012. Retrieved December 1, 2013.
- "Final Fantasy XIV Online: A Realm Reborn for PC Reviews". Metacritic. Retrieved September 12, 2013.
- Messner, Steven (July 23, 2019). "FINAL FANTASY 14: SHADOWBRINGERS REVIEW". PC Gamer. Retrieved August 5, 2019.
- Ackerman, Dan (March 9, 2010). "Power Gig, a music game with real guitars". CNET. Retrieved April 22, 2010.
- Murph, Darren (March 9, 2010). "Seven45 Studios talks Power Gig details, we go hands-on with its six string guitar peripheral". Engadget. Retrieved April 20, 2010.
- Kuchera, Ben (June 8, 2010). "Power Gig rhythm game debuts drumless drums... wait, what?". Ars Technica. Retrieved June 8, 2010.
- McElroy, Griffin (October 29, 2010). "Power Gig: Rise of the SixString review: God took rock 'n' roll from you". Joystiq. Retrieved November 3, 2010.
- "PowerGig: Rise of the SixString Review". Giant Bomb. Retrieved April 8, 2020.
- Bratcher, Eric (November 9, 2010). "Power Gig: Rise of the SixString review". GamesRadar. Retrieved November 17, 2010.
- DeVries, Jack (October 28, 2010). "IGN: Power Gig: Rise of the SixString Review". IGN. Retrieved November 3, 2010.
- "Power Gig: Rise of the SixString (Xbox360: 2010)". Metacritic. Retrieved November 3, 2010.
- "Giant Bomb's Game of the Year 2010: Day Six". Giant Bomb. Whiskey Media. Archived from the original on October 14, 2012. Retrieved September 13, 2014.
- "Vince Desi von Running with Scissors im Interview". RebelGamer.de (in German). January 20, 2012. Retrieved February 4, 2012.
- "Postal III". Metacritic. Retrieved January 9, 2012.
- "POSTAL III has been removed from our store". Running wish Scissors. Archived from the original on June 29, 2013. Retrieved February 8, 2013.
- "Postal 3 review". PC Gamer. Retrieved February 8, 2013.
- "Postal III Review". IGN. Retrieved February 8, 2013.
- "Postal III Review: Offensive For All The Wrong Reasons". Game Informer. Retrieved February 8, 2013.
- "FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction for PC Reviews". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. Retrieved September 5, 2015.
- Edge Staff (February 2012). "FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction review". Edge. Future Publishing (237).
- Stanton, Rich (January 5, 2012). "Flatout 3: Chaos & Destruction Review". Eurogamer. Gamer Network. Retrieved September 5, 2015.
- "FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction". GamesMaster: 102. March 2012.
- Meunier, Nathan (December 22, 2011). "FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction Review". GameSpot. CBS Interactive. Retrieved September 5, 2015.
- Pearson, Craig. "The War Z Review". GameSpy. Retrieved January 14, 2013.
- "The War Z Review". IGN. Retrieved January 14, 2013.
- Stapleton, Dan (December 18, 2012). "A Shocking Interview With The War Z Developer On False Steam Store Claims". GameSpy. Retrieved December 19, 2012.
- "The War Z interview: Sergey Titov responds to backlash, sale removal from Steam". PC Gamer. Retrieved January 14, 2013.
- Yin-Poole, Wesley (December 19, 2012). "The War Z dev apologises to gamers who "misread" Steam page, hits out at "extreme DayZ fanboys"". Eurogamer. Retrieved December 19, 2012.
- "The War Z renamed as Infestation: Survivor Stories – is still rubbish". PC Gamer. Retrieved June 20, 2013.
- Sarkar, Samit (May 20, 2016). "SimCity 2013's creative director explains what went right and what went so, so wrong". Polygon. Retrieved July 5, 2017.
- Ingraham, Nathan (March 7, 2013). "EA disabling 'non-critical' features and adding more servers to address ongoing 'SimCity' connection issues". The Verge. Retrieved July 5, 2017.
- Staff (March 7, 2013). "SimCity launch crippled by server issues". Polygon. Retrieved July 5, 2017.
- Totilo, Stephan (March 15, 2013). "SimCity Boss Says They 'Rejected' Any Offline Mode, Clarifies Server Use". Kotaku. Retrieved July 5, 2017.
- Lejacq, Yannick (October 4, 2013). "Offline mode for 'SimCity' being explored by EA, Maxis". NBC News. Retrieved July 5, 2017.
- Yin-Poole, Wesley (March 18, 2014). "SimCity can now be played offline". Eurogamer. Retrieved July 5, 2017.
- "SimCity for PC". Metacritic. Retrieved July 5, 2017.
- McWhertor, Michael (March 7, 2013). "SimCity no longer being sold by Amazon, warns about server issues". Polygon. Retrieved July 5, 2017.
- McWhertor, Michael (March 8, 2013). "EA giving free game to SimCity players, hopes to fix launch issues by this weekend". Polygon. Retrieved July 5, 2017.
- McWhertor, Michael (April 5, 2013). "EA's Peter Moore vows to 'do better' in response to 'worst company in America' poll". Polygon. Retrieved July 5, 2017.
- Sarkar, Samit (March 4, 2015). "EA shuts down Maxis Emeryville, studio behind SimCity". Polygon. Retrieved July 5, 2017.
- Dean, Paul. "Cities: Skyline is out to satisfy where SimCity couldn't". Eurogamer. Retrieved April 20, 2015.
- Dingman, Hayden. "Cities: Skylines is more like SimCity than SimCity". PC World. Archived from the original on January 22, 2017. Retrieved April 20, 2015.
- Maiberg, Emanuel (March 17, 2015). "The 'SimCity' Empire Has Fallen and 'Skylines' Is Picking Up the Pieces". Vice. Retrieved July 5, 2017.
- "Cities: Skylines Review – Modern City Building Made Easy – Reviews – The Escapist". The Escapist.
- Phil Hornshaw (February 16, 2013). "All the Ways Aliens: Colonial Marines Breaks the 'Aliens' Story". GameFront. Retrieved April 4, 2013.
- Mike Sharkey (February 20, 2013). "How Aliens: Colonial Marines Seriously Screws Up Alien Lore". GameSpy. Retrieved April 4, 2013.
- Justice, Brandon (February 12, 2013). "EGM Review Aliens: Colonial Marines". EGMNOW.com. Archived from the original on February 13, 2013. Retrieved February 13, 2013.
- VanOrd, Kevin (February 12, 2013). "Aliens: Colonial Marines Review". GameSpot. CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on February 15, 2013. Retrieved February 12, 2013.
- Schreier, Jason (February 25, 2013). "From Dream To Disaster: The Story Of Aliens: Colonial Marines". Kotaku. Retrieved April 23, 2013.
- Matulef, Jeffrey (February 19, 2013). "Aliens: Colonial Marines' demo looked much prettier than the final game". Eurogamer. Eurogamer Network. Retrieved February 22, 2013.
- "Sega blames Gearbox for mismanaging Aliens: Colonial Marines marketing". Polygon. Retrieved May 22, 2015.
- "Gearbox and Sega falsely advertised Aliens: Colonial Marines with press demos, according to lawsuit (update)". Polygon. Retrieved May 22, 2015.
- "Sega to tentatively pay out $1.25M in Aliens suit while Gearbox fights on". Polygon. Retrieved May 22, 2015.
- Wawro, Alex (July 13, 2018). "Colonial Marines modder finds big AI fix by changing one letter of code". Gamasutra. Retrieved July 13, 2018.
- "Ride to Hell: Retribution Review". GameSpot. June 24, 2013. Retrieved July 18, 2013.
- "EGM Review: Ride to Hell: Retribution". EGMNow. Retrieved August 19, 2013.
- "Ride to Hell: Retribution for Xbox 360 Reviews". Metacritic. June 25, 2013. Retrieved August 8, 2013.
- "Highest and Lowest Scoring Games – Page 18". Metacritic. Retrieved July 18, 2013.
- "Reviews and News Articles – GameRankings". www.gamerankings.com. Retrieved September 4, 2019.
- "Double Dragon II: Wander of the Dragons". Metacritic. Retrieved September 4, 2019.
- "Double Dragon II: Wander Of The Dragons review – worst game ever". Metro. April 15, 2013. Retrieved September 4, 2019.
- Dan Whitehead (February 5, 2014). "Dungeon Keeper review". Eurogamer. Retrieved December 4, 2016.
- David Jenkins (February 4, 2014). "Dungeon Keeper review – microtransaction hell". Metro. Retrieved December 4, 2016.
- Jim Sterling (February 2, 2014). "Dungeon Keeper Mobile Review – Wallet Reaper". The Escapist. Retrieved December 4, 2016.
- "Dungeon Keeper for iOS review". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. Retrieved December 10, 2016.
- Leif Johnson (February 11, 2014). "Dungeon Keeper iPad and iPhone Review". IGN. Retrieved December 4, 2016.
- James Vincent (February 10, 2014). "Dungeon Keeper mobile remake deemed 'unplayable' due to in-app purchases". Independent. Retrieved December 5, 2016.
- Mark Ward (February 7, 2014). "EA faces criticism over mobile Dungeon Keeper game". BBC. Retrieved December 4, 2016.
- Emanuel Maiberg (February 8, 2014). "Peter Molyneux on free-to-play Dungeon Keeper: "This is ridiculous"". GameSpot. Retrieved December 4, 2016.
- Luke Villapaz (February 10, 2014). "'Dungeon Keeper' Review Controversy: EA Responds To Accusation Of Rating Manipulation In Google Play Store". International Business Times. Retrieved December 5, 2016.
- Mike Rose (July 2, 2014). "UK regulatory body rules that free-to-play Dungeon Keeper isn't really free". Gamasutra. Retrieved December 5, 2016.
- "ASA Ruling on Electronic Arts Ltd". Advertising Standards Authority. Retrieved December 5, 2016.
- Sam Machkovech (July 2, 2014). "British regulator: EA "misled" by calling Dungeon Keeper free-to-play". Ars Technica. Retrieved December 5, 2016.
- Wesley Yin-Poole (July 2, 2014). "UK watchdog bans Dungeon Keeper ad, accuses EA of "misleading" customers". Eurogamer. Retrieved December 5, 2016.
- "Former Naughty Dogs Found Big Red Button". Edge. Retrieved December 4, 2014.
- Saas, Don (November 14, 2014). "Sonic boo". GameSpot. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
- David Jenkins (November 25, 2014). "Sonic Boom: Rise Of Lyric review – fall of a hedgehog". Metro. Retrieved November 25, 2014.
- "Sonic Boom: Rise of Lyric". Metacritic. Retrieved December 4, 2014.
- "Sonic Boom: Rise of Lyric Review – Review". Nintendo World Report.
- Copeland, Wesley (February 12, 2015). "Sonic Boom is the Worst-Selling Sonic Title in History". IGN.com. Retrieved February 12, 2015.
- "Alone in the Dark: Illumination for PC". GameRankings. Retrieved March 27, 2019.
- "Alone in the Dark: Illumination for PC Reviews". Metacritic. Retrieved July 13, 2015.
- "The 10 Worst Video Games of 2015". Metacritic. Retrieved December 21, 2015.
- Jim Sterling. "Alone in the Dark: Illumination Review". Archived from the original on June 15, 2015.
- Maiberg, Emanuel (September 30, 2015). "SkaterGate: Did Activision Rush Tony Hawk Pro Skater 5' for Legal Reasons?". Vice. Retrieved December 30, 2017.
- Tamburro, Paul (September 30, 2015). "Activision May Have Left Tony Hawk's Pro Skater to Die Because its License Expires in 2015". CraveOnline. Retrieved December 30, 2017.
- "Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5 review: Pop-shove it in the garbage". IGN.com. IGN Entertainment. Retrieved October 9, 2015.
- "Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5 review". GameSpot. CBS Interactive. Retrieved October 9, 2015.
- Frank, Allegra (December 30, 2015). "The worst video games of 2015". Polygon. Vox Media. Retrieved February 7, 2016.
- Albert, Brian (June 24, 2016). "Umbrella Corps Review". IGN. Retrieved January 25, 2017.
- Brown, Peter (June 21, 2016). "Umbrella Corps Review". GameSpot. Retrieved April 7, 2017.
- Furniss, Zach (June 25, 2016). "Review: Umbrella Corps". Destructoid. Retrieved April 7, 2016.
- Jacques, John (July 2016). "Umbrella Corps Review". Game Rant. Retrieved April 7, 2017.
- Reeves, Ben (July 6, 2016). "Undead on Arrival—Umbrella Corps—PlayStation 4". Game Informer. Retrieved April 7, 2017.
- Onder, Cade (June 25, 2016). "Review: Umbrella Corps is the worst entry in the Resident Evil franchise since 6". GameZone. Retrieved April 7, 2017.
- Frushtick, Russ (June 23, 2016). "Umbrella Corps review". Polygon. Retrieved April 7, 2017.
- White, Olivia (January 20, 2017). "Resident Evil rated – The best (and worst) games of the famous horror series". The Telegraph. Retrieved April 7, 2017.
- "The Resident Evil games ranked from worst to best". PC Gamer. March 9, 2017. Retrieved April 7, 2017.
- "Umbrella Corps". Metacritic. Retrieved January 26, 2017.
- Signal, Jesse (October 6, 2016). "The lesson of 'No Man's Sky': Don't believe the hype". Boston Globe. Retrieved October 9, 2016.
- Frank, Allegra (August 10, 2016). "No Man's Sky players travel the exact same planet without ever crossing paths". Polygon. Retrieved August 11, 2016.
- Hillier, Brenna (August 12, 2016). "No Man's Sky reviews: is this the most divisive game of 2016?". VG247. Retrieved August 18, 2016.
- Saed, Sharif (October 10, 2016). "No Man's Sky is now of the lowest-rated games on Steam". VG247. Retrieved October 10, 2016.
- Mackovech, Sam (March 3, 2017). "No Man's Sky creator describes issues with launch, crashes, money". Ars Technica. Retrieved March 3, 2017.
- Webster, Andrew (August 18, 2017). "IT'S A GREAT TIME TO JUMP BACK INTO NO MAN'S SKY". The Verge. Retrieved August 18, 2017.
- Muncy, Julie (August 15, 2017). "ONE YEAR LATER, NO MAN'S SKY—AND ITS EVOLUTION—IS WORTH EXPLORING". Wired. Retrieved August 17, 2017.
- Phillips, Tom (March 31, 2017). "Ken Levine's next game will be "more challenging" than BioShock". Eurogamer. Retrieved March 31, 2017.
- Seppala, Timothy (October 11, 2016). "'Cuphead' and its deal with the devil pushed into 2017". Engadget. Retrieved March 31, 2017.
- Guarino, Ben (September 16, 2016). "The Most Hyped Board Game of 2016 Earned It". Inverse. Retrieved March 31, 2017.
- Lane, Rick (September 18, 2016). "Looking back at Spore in a post-No Man's Sky world". Eurogamer. Retrieved March 31, 2017.
- Byford, Sam; Gartenberg, Chaim (November 14, 2017). "EA's Star Wars Battlefront II backtrack shows the limitations of loot boxes". The Verge. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
- Dingman, Hayden (October 10, 2017). "How loot boxes are turning full-priced PC games into pay-to-win games of chance". PC World. Retrieved October 10, 2017.
- Purchase, Robert (October 9, 2017). "Star Wars Battlefront 2 has a loot crate problem". Eurogamer. Retrieved October 10, 2017.
- Fahey, Rob (October 13, 2017). "Thinking outside the loot box". GamesIndustry.biz. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
- Hood, Vic (October 12, 2017). "Are loot boxes gambling?". Eurogamer. Retrieved October 12, 2017.
- Ore, Jonathan (October 29, 2017). "Loot box brouhaha: Are video games becoming too much like gambling?". CBC. Retrieved October 30, 2017.
- Hoggins, Tom (November 17, 2017). "Star Wars Battlefront 2 loot box furore could mark a turning point for the games industry". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
- Needleman, Sarah; Fritz, Ben (November 17, 2017). "Electronic Arts Pulls Microtransactions From 'Star Wars Battlefront II' After Fan Backlash". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
- Crecente, Brian (March 16, 2018). "'Star Wars Battlefront II' Loot Box Overhaul Detailed". Glixel. Retrieved March 16, 2018.
- Sarkar, Samit (January 30, 2018). "Star Wars Battlefront 2 sales miss targets, EA blames loot crate controversy". Polygon. Retrieved January 30, 2018.
- Kim, Tae (November 28, 2017). "EA's day of reckoning is here after 'Star Wars' game uproar, $3 billion in stock value wiped out". CNBC. Retrieved November 28, 2017.
- Crecente, Brian (February 14, 2018). "U.S. Senator Calls on ESRB to Review Ratings Process in Light of Loot Boxes". Glixel. Retrieved February 14, 2018.
- Fogel, Stefanie (February 27, 2018). "U.S. Senator 'Still Concerned' About Loot Boxes Following ESRB Letter". Glixel. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
- Bailey, Jason (April 24, 2018). "A Video Game 'Loot Box' Offers Coveted Rewards, but Is It Gambling?". The New York Times. Retrieved April 25, 2018.
- Bailey, Kat (November 11, 2018). "Fallout 76's Reception Has Been Worse Than Anyone Could Have Imagined. Can Bethesda Right the Ship?". USGamer. Retrieved December 21, 2018.
- Gach, Ethan. "Bug-Riddled Update Shows Why Fallout 76 Needs A Public Test Server". Kotaku.
- Gach, Ethan. "Fallout 76 Players Throw Up Their Hands At The Return Of Heavy Bobby Pins". Kotaku. Retrieved February 1, 2019.
- Sirani, Jordan. "FALLOUT 76 TEMPORARILY TAKEN OFFLINE AFTER PATCH REINTRODUCES OLD BUGS". IGN. Retrieved February 1, 2019.
- Yin-Poole, Wesley. "Fallout 76 players say the Atom shop prices are getting out of hand". Eurogamer. Retrieved January 8, 2019.
- Hernandez, Patricia. "Fallout 76 players say big new patch is a mess". Polygon. Retrieved October 25, 2019.
- Gach, Ethan. "Bug-Riddled Update Shows Why Fallout 76 Needs A Public Test Server". Kotaku. Retrieved October 25, 2019.
- Marshall, Cass. "Fallout 76 fans are furious over the newest cash shop items". Polygon. Retrieved October 25, 2019.
- Webb, Kevin. "It's insulting': Players barred for cheating in 'Fallout 76' are being told to write an essay to reclaim their account". Business Insider. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
- Gach, Ethan. "Fallout 76 Players Are Punishing People They Suspect Of Duplicating Rare Items". Kotaku. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
- Galitski, Kirk. "Fallout 76 Data Miner Banned Despite Efforts To Help Bethesda". The Gamer. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
- Marshall, Cass. "Fallout 76 getting new PvP mode, player vending, but the economy is broken". Polygon.
- Marshall, Cass. "Fallout 76 players are taking vigilante action against in-game dupers". Polygon.
- Gach, Ethan. "Hackers Find Way To Add NPCs To Fallout 76". Kotaku. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
- Gach, Ethan. "Bethesda Patches Fallout 76 Cheat After Hacker Uses It To Steal Players' Items". Kotaku. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
- Bailey, Kat (November 26, 2018). "Fallout 76 Should be a Cautionary Tale for Publishers". USGamer. Retrieved December 21, 2018.
- Yin-Poole, Wesley. "Fallout 76 gets a £12-a-month subscription called Fallout 1st". Eurogamer. Retrieved October 24, 2019.
- Skrebels, Joe. "Fallout 76 Now Has a $100-a-Year Subscription Service, Fallout 1st". IGN. Retrieved October 24, 2019.
- Tassi, Paul. "'Fallout 76' Now Has A Premium Monthly Subscription Fee, No Seriously". Forbes. Retrieved October 24, 2019.
- Totilo, Stephen. "Bethesda Is Now Selling $100 Annual Subscriptions For Exclusive Fallout 76 Features". Kotaku. Retrieved October 24, 2019.
- Tassi, Paul. "Fallout 76's Premium Private Servers Are Not Private, Its Scrap Box Is Deleting Scrap". Forbes. Retrieved November 5, 2019.
- Plunkett, Luke. "Fallout 76's Paid Subscription Service Has Not Had A Good Launch". Kotaku. Retrieved November 5, 2019.
- Good, Owen. "Players say Fallout 76's subscription service is busted, Bethesda responds". Polygon. Retrieved November 5, 2019.
- Gamer. "Bethesda will grant those that lost scrap to Scrapbox glitch "a wide variety of scrap items"". Games Today. Retrieved January 24, 2020.
- Ramee, Jordan. "Bethesda Clarifies Fallout 76's Private Server Issues, Acknowledges Some Players Are Losing Items". Forbes. Retrieved January 24, 2020.
- Kent, Emma (December 4, 2018). "Bethesda to finally deliver canvas bags following Fallout 76 fan fury". Eurogamer. Retrieved December 21, 2018.
- Ruppert, Liana. "'Fallout 76' Fans Are Upset That Bethesda's $80 'Fallout' Rum Bottles Are Made of Plastic". Comic Book. Retrieved January 9, 2019.
- Hall, Charlie. "Fallout 76 wearable helmet recalled because of dangerous mold". Polygon.
- Alexander, Julia. "A collectible Fallout 76 helmet was recalled due to dangerous levels of mold". The Verge. Vox Media.
- Marshall, Cass (April 16, 2020). "Fallout 76 fans are ignoring review bombs, laying out the welcome mat". Polygon. Retrieved April 17, 2020.
- Beckhelling, Imogen (April 16, 2020). "Steam users tried to review bomb Fallout 76, but some of its fans are having none of it". Rock Paper Shotgun. Retrieved April 17, 2020.
- Saed, Sharif (January 30, 2020). "Warcraft 3: Reforged is not making its owners, or players of the original happy". VG247. Retrieved February 1, 2020.
- Robinson, Andy (February 1, 2020). "Warcraft 3: Reforged is now the worst user scored game ever on Metacritic". VideoGamesChronicle. Retrieved February 1, 2020.
- Yin-Poole, Wesley (February 7, 2020). "Blizzard begins Warcraft 3: Reforged's road to recovery with 2GB patch". Eurogamer. Retrieved February 10, 2020.