Lisztomania (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Lisztomania movie poster.jpg
Promotional poster for Lisztomania
Directed byKen Russell
Produced byRoy Baird
David Puttnam
Written byKen Russell
StarringRoger Daltrey
Sara Kestelman
Paul Nicholas
Ringo Starr
Rick Wakeman
Music byRick Wakeman
Franz Liszt
Richard Wagner
CinematographyPeter Suschitzky
Edited byStuart Baird
Distributed byWarner Bros. Pictures
Release date
10 October 1975
Running time
103 minutes
CountryUnited Kingdom
Budget£1.2 million[1] [2]

Lisztomania is a 1975 musical film written and directed by Ken Russell about the nineteenth century composer Franz Liszt. The screenplay is derived, in part, from a "kiss-and-tell" book, Nélida by Marie d'Agoult (1848), about her affair with Liszt.

Depicting the flamboyant Liszt as the first classical pop star, Lisztomania features contemporary rock star Roger Daltrey (of The Who) as Franz Liszt. The film was released the same year as Tommy, which also starred Daltrey and was directed by Russell. Rick Wakeman, from the progressive rock band Yes, composed the Lisztomania soundtrack, which included synthesiser arrangements of works by Liszt and Wagner. He also appears in the film as the Nordic god of thunder, Thor. Daltrey and Russell wrote the lyrics for the soundtrack, and Daltrey provided vocals. Of the other rock celebrities appearing in the film, Ringo Starr, drummer of The Beatles, appears as the Pope.

The term "Lisztomania" was coined by the German romantic literary figure Heinrich Heine to describe the massive public response to Liszt's virtuosic piano performances. At these performances, there were allegedly screaming women, and the audience was sometimes limited to standing room only.

This film was first to use the new Dolby Stereo sound system.

Plot summary[edit]

Rather than presenting a straightforward narrative, the film tells of Liszt's life through a series of surrealistic episodes blending fact and fantasy, and full of anachronistic elements. At the start of the film, Liszt is caught in bed with Marie d'Agoult by her husband the Count d'Agoult. The Count challenges Liszt to a fight with sabres but Marie begs the count to let her share Liszt's fate. The Count then orders his staff to trap Liszt and Marie into the body of a piano, nailing it shut, and then leaving it on railroad tracks.

This 19th century steam engine on the Bluebell Railway was featured in the film

The scene is then shown to be a flashback triggered by the camera flash of photographers backstage before one of Liszt's concerts. Richard Wagner appears and Liszt introduces him to his circle of colleagues including Gioachino Rossini, Hector Berlioz, Frédéric Chopin, and Hans von Bülow. Liszt then pays Wagner to allow him to perform a variation on a theme from Rienzi. At the concert, Wagner is put off by Liszt's crowd-pleasing showmanship at the expense of serious musicianship, which includes adding the melody of Chopsticks to his Rienzi variation. However the crowd, consisting entirely of young screaming girls, go wild at Liszt's performance, storming the stage. Liszt uses von Bülow to proposition potentially wealthy females in the audience during his performance. One of them is Princess Carolyn, who relays to Liszt her address in Russia.

The next scene shows Marie's and Liszt's domestic life plagued by jealousy over his constant touring and his infidelities. At this point they have three children, the oldest being Cosima. Domestic life has also strained Liszt's creativity. Liszt prepares to depart to St. Petersburg to play for the Tsar. Marie threatens to abandon him if he decides to go. Liszt then suggests to Cosima that he would sell his soul to the Devil to be able to compose brilliant music again. As Liszt is leaving, Cosima consoles him that she will pray to God every day so that Liszt will meet the Devil and be able to sell his soul to him.

In Russia, Liszt meets Princess Carolyn at her court. She begins to seduce him, offering him the ability to compose the brilliant music he wanted in exchange for total control of his life. In one of the most ostentatious scenes of the movie, Liszt then experiences a hallucination where the women of Princess Carolyn's court assail him but then become seduced by his music which strokes his libido and gives him a 10-foot erection. Carolyn sinisterly observes from afar as the women celebrate his giant erection with a chorus line. The women then drag Liszt and his erection to a guillotine in which Carolyn reveals that the bargain for Liszt's newfound musical prolificity is the forfeiture of his libertinism.

The next scene shows Liszt in Dresden during the May Uprising, conflicted about not supporting his friends in the revolt and spending all his time isolated to compose music (it is also heavily implied that Marie and his two youngest children have been killed). Wagner, now a political criminal on the lam, reappears and asks Liszt for money so that he can escape the country with his family. As Liszt tends Wagner's wounds, Wagner secretly drugs Liszt, who passes out. Wagner then reveals himself to be a vampire with a mission to write music that will inspire a new German nationalism. He then proceeds to suck Liszt's blood and compose on the piano. Before departing, Wagner leaves him his latest political pamphlet, a Superman comic (a play on Friedrich Nietzsche's Superman).

Liszt and Carolyn travel to the Vatican to get married after the Pope agrees to grant her a divorce from her husband. The wedding is ultimately voided by the intervention of her husband and the Tsar. Furious at the Pope's political impotence, Carolyn threatens to write an anthology on her disagreements with the Church (Causes intérieures de la faiblesse extérieure de l'Église en 1870). Liszt then proposes that he will join the Church as an abbot.

Liszt's life as an abbot is shown to be disobedient as he is caught in bed with a woman. The Pope then explains that Wagner has seduced Cosima as his wife and has begun to lead a devilish cult organised around his music. He tasks Liszt with travelling to Wagner's castle to exorcise him and return him to the Christian faith or else Liszt will be excommunicated and his music banned.

Liszt travels to Wagner's castle, where he observes a secret ritual portraying a devilish Jew raping several blonde-haired Germanic nymphs. Wagner then appears with Cosima, dressed in Superman outfits, and sings how "the flowering youth of Germany was raped by 'the beast'" and that a "new messiah" will soon arrive to drive out the beast. At the conclusion of the song, Cosima marches the audience, composed entirely of children, out with a Nazi salute as they chant that they "will be the master race".

Liszt confronts Wagner, who is unaware of what Liszt has seen, and inquires about his ambitions. Wagner confesses that he has been building a mechanical Viking Siegfried to rid the country of Jews. When Wagner awakens Siegfried with his music, the creature turns out to be crass and slow-witted. Liszt sneaks holy water into Wagner's drink but the water has no effect. Wagner then reveals himself to Liszt as a vampire and threatens to steal his music so that Wagner's Viking can live. Liszt rushes to the piano and plays music, exorcising Wagner and bringing him to near death. Cosima, witnessing Wagner's moribund state, imprisons Liszt and then resurrects Wagner in a Nazi ceremony as a Frankenstein-Hitler wielding a machine-gun guitar. Trapped, Liszt observes as Cosima leads the Wagner-Hitler to gun down the town's Jews, after which she kills Liszt by stabbing a needle through the heart of a voodoo doll made in his likeness.

In Heaven, Liszt is reunited with the women he has romanced in his life and Cosima, though it is never explained how she got there after killing Liszt, who regret their behaviour towards him and each other and finally live in harmony. In the final episode, Liszt and the women decide to fly down to Earth in a spaceship to destroy Wagner-Hitler who has now ravaged Berlin in a fiery machine-gun frenzy. Once Wagner-Hitler is destroyed, Liszt sings that he has found "peace at last".



David Puttnam's company Goodtimes planned to make a series of six films about composers, all to be directed by Ken Russell. Subjects were to include Franz Liszt, George Gershwin, Berlioz and Vaughan Williams; the first one was Mahler (1974) which had been a minor success. In July 1974 Russell said he wanted Al Pacino to play Gershwin and Mick Jagger to play Liszt because Liszt had been "the first pop star".[3]

Puttnam says he wanted to follow it with a biopic of Gershwin starring Al Pacino but claims Russell had just made Tommy and wanted to make a film about Liszt with Roger Daltrey.[4] Russell wrote he had written films about both Liszt and Gershwin—the latter was called The Gershwin Dream and it was Puttnam who chose Liszt; Russell say this was "probably" because Russell wanted to play Liszt.[5]

In October 1974 Russell announced Roger Daltrey would play Liszt.[6] "Liszt's music is just like modern day rock," said Daltrey in November. "He was a lot like me... he had this religious thing like me but he still went lusting after women."[7] "Roger is a natural, brilliant performer," said Russell. "He acts as he sings and the results are magical. He also has a curious quality of innocence which is why he was a perfect Tommy and why he is the only person to play Liszt."[8]

In December 1974 Mayfair announced they signed a deal to distribute five films made by Russell and Goodtimes started with one on Liszt.[9]

In February 1975 Russell said Marty Feldman was to play Wagner.[10] The same month the title was changed from Liszt to Lisztomania.[11]


Puttnam said "The problem was he [Russell] never finished his screenplay and, frankly, he just seemed to go off his rocker."[12] Russell said he was most intrigued by Liszt's relationship with Wagner but Puttnam "was more at home at a pop concert than in the concert hall. He threw out my first script for being too straight and urged me to write another emphasising the pop element."[13]

Press materials claimed Russell's script was 57 pages.[14]

Russell later wrote that "I was playing Trilby to his [Puttnam's] Svengali".[15] He claims it was Puttnam who suggested Ringo Starr play a support role, got Richard Wakeman to do the music and suggested Russell go anamorphic.[16]

Daltrey said he found the part difficult because he had no lines in Tommy and could not play the piano.[17]

Puttnam said "the film was rocketing over budget and every time I got back from raising money, the budget had gone up again. I did my best but it was a nightmare, impossible to keep up with."[18]

Sandy Lieberson of Goodtimes said Russell "went off the deep end" forcing Lieberson and Puttnam to put their own money into the film.[19]

"The film's going to be like Tom Jones riding in Blazing Saddles," said Russell.[8]



Roger Ebert gave the film three out of four stars and called it "a berserk exercise of demented genius, and on that level (I want to make my praise explicit) it functions and sometimes even works. Most people will probably despise it."[20] Richard Eder of The New York Times wrote that for the first half-hour the film is "manic and extremely funny. Then it relapses into a noisy bit of pretentiousness in the manner of its predecessor, Tommy full of flashing lights, satin spacesuits, chrome-lucite furniture and mock agony."[21] Gene Siskel of the Chicago Tribune gave the film one star out of four and wrote that "Russell fills the screen with enough outlandish sexual imagery to render one's senses numb. The film's publicists would have you believe Lisztomania is outrageous; on the contrary, it's just boring."[22] Kevin Thomas of the Los Angeles Times called it "a buoyant, consistently coherent and imaginative film that is alternately—and sometimes simultaneously—outrageous, hilarious and poignant."[23] Gary Arnold of The Washington Post wrote that "it becomes painfully evident that Russell, the Great Vulgarian of contemporary filmmaking, should have quit while he was ahead, sort of. A boudoir-farce approach to the life and legend of Liszt would have been trivial-minded, but harmlessly trivial-minded compared to the collection of obscene fantasies and gassy profundities Russell resorts to after his muse runs out of comic ideas."[24] Pauline Kael wrote, "In a couple of sequences, it erupts successfully with a wholehearted, comic-strip craziness, but for all his lashing himself into a slapstick fury, the director Ken Russell can't seem to pull the elements of film making together."[25]

The German reviewer Hans-Christoph Blumenberg [de], reviewing the film for Die Zeit summed up the film as follows:

With Russell, who had succeeded in producing an artist portrait of bizarre precision with Mahler, Lisztomania is only a tiring litany of cabaret numbers, which, by means of anachronisms, pseudo-critical analogies, and daring casting choices (for example, Ringo Starr as a pope) gains conviction. ... In Lisztomania, an exorbitantly vicious berserker drifts at the ruins of his talent, loses himself in an abundance of highly disparate incidents, which nevertheless only ends in shrill monotony."[26]

Another German reviewer, Hans J. Wulff devoted a six-page article to the film, and commented:

The films break with the tradition of biographical narration and stage music and music culture in a wild collage in which heterogeneous material is brought together. Lisztomania is among the most widely known of Russell's films, at the same time most complex and still most irritating. ... The fascination of Lisztomania is the method. The entire [Western] cultural history is the material with which Russell designs his montage, indifferent whether it is high or trivial culture. Much cultural knowledge, though highly controlled, is the theme of the film, giving it expression and vividness."[27]

Leonard Maltin's home video guide gave the film one and a half stars out of four,[28] while the Golden Movie Retriever said "WOOF!"[29]

Lisztomania currently holds a 50% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on ten reviews.[30]

Russell later said "he got off on the wrong foot" with the film which "called for a bigger budget than we had so the film doesn't work as well as I wanted it to. The symbolism moreover is a bit too relentless and the fantasy sequences tend to submerge the reality of the characters. I think I had exhausted the vein of biographies of composers at the time."[31]

Box office[edit]

The film was a box office flop and ended the plans for Goodtimes to make more films with Russell.[32]


  1. ^ Alexander Walker, National Heroes: British Cinema in the Seventies and Eighties, Harrap, 1985 p. 83
  2. ^ Yule p 51
  3. ^ "Personalities Plus," Robin Adams Sloan. Chicago Tribune 21 July 1974: g9.
  4. ^ Yule p 49–51
  5. ^ Russell p 166
  6. ^ Julie: "Cover-up A 'Mistake'," The Washington Post 16 Oct 1974: B2.
  7. ^ "Daltrey's Baptism of Fire in Ken Russell's 'Tommy'," Lewis, Fiona. Los Angeles Times 17 Nov 1974: p34.
  8. ^ a b "The Rock Star Who Plays Franz Liszt: The Rock Star Who Plays Franz Liszt," By WILLIAM HALL. New York Times 18 May 1975: D1.
  9. ^ "Tribute Scheduled for Dorothy Arzner," Murphy, Mary. Los Angeles Times (1923–1995); Los Angeles, Calif. 27 Dec 1974: f19.
  10. ^ "Movies: Ken Russell Hums a Few Bars Flatley, Guy." Los Angeles Times 16 Feb 1975: z24.
  11. ^ "The Pop Life: Name Is White, but Sound Is Black," New York Times 28 Feb 1975: 15.
  12. ^ Yule p 51
  13. ^ Russell p 166
  14. ^ Ken Russell: "He's Got a Little Liszt," Los Angeles Times (1923–1995); Los Angeles, Calif. 24 Oct 1975: f14.
  15. ^ Russell p 167
  16. ^ Russell p 167
  17. ^ "FROM 'TOMMY' TO LISZT: Film Career a Surprise to Daltry Film Career a Surprise to Roger Daltry," Hunt, Dennis. Los Angeles Times 12 Aug 1975: e1.
  18. ^ Yule p 51
  19. ^ Yule p 51
  20. ^ Ebert, Roger (28 October 1975). "Lisztomania". Retrieved 18 December 2018.
  21. ^ Eder, Richard (11 October 1975). "Screen: 'Lisztomania'". The New York Times. 23.
  22. ^ Siskel, Gene (30 October 1975). "'Lisztomania': A lot of garish imagery by a former filmmaker". Chicago Tribune. Section 3, p. 4.
  23. ^ Thomas, Kevin (17 October 1975). "'Lisztomania': Opera Fantasy". Los Angeles Times. Part IV, p. 13.
  24. ^ Arnold, Gary (24 October 1975). "A Lewd Liszt To a Rock Beat". The Washington Post. B10.
  25. ^ Pauline Kael, 5001 Nights at the Movies, Henry Holt and Company, 1983, p. 330
  26. ^ Hans C. Blumenberg in Die Zeit, 4 June 1976: "Filmtips", accessed 6 September 2011 (translated from German Wikipedia)
  27. ^ Hans J. Wulff in Kieler Beiträge zur Filmmusikforschung, 1/2008, pp. 165 ff.: "Lisztomania", accessed 6 September 2011 (translated from German Wikipedia)
  28. ^ Leonard Maltin, Movie and Video Guide, 2003, New York, Plume, 2002
  29. ^ Martin Connors and Jim Craddock, editors, Video Hound’s Golden Movie Retriever, Detroit: Visible Ink Press, 1998
  30. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2 December 2017. Retrieved 21 August 2017.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  31. ^ FACT, FANTASY, AND THE FILMS OF KEN RUSSELL: AN INTERVIEW Phillips, Gene D. Journal of Popular Film; Washington, D.C. Vol. 5, Iss. 3, (Jan 1, 1976): 200.
  32. ^ Yule p 52


  • Yule, Andrew (1989). Fast fade : David Puttnam, Columbia Pictures, and the battle for Hollywood. Delacorte Press.

External links[edit]