Liturgical Movement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Liturgical Movement was a 19th-century and 20th-century movement of scholarship for the reform of worship. It began in the Catholic Church and spread to many other Christian churches including the Anglican Communion, Lutheran and some other Protestant churches.[1]


Background to the Mass of the Roman Rite[edit]

Developments in Belgium and Germany[edit]

At almost the same time, in Germany Abbot Ildefons Herwegen of Maria Laach convened a liturgical conference in Holy Week 1914 for lay people. Herwegen thereafter promoted research which resulted in a series of publications for clergy and lay people during and after World War I. One of the foremost German scholars was Odo Casel. Having begun by studying the Middle Ages, Casel looked at the origins of Christian liturgy in pagan cultic acts, understanding liturgy as a profound universal human act as well as a religious one. In his Ecclesia Orans (The Praying Church) (1918), Casel studied and interpreted the pagan mysteries of ancient Greece and Rome, discussing similarities and differences between them and the Christian mysteries. His conclusions were studied in various places, notably at Klosterneuburg in Austria, where the Augustinian canon Pius Parsch applied the principles in his church of St. Gertrude, which he took over in 1919. With laymen he worked out the relevance of the Bible to liturgy. Similar experiments were to take place in Leipzig during the Second World War.[2]

Second Vatican Council[edit]

Effect on church architecture[edit]

The Liturgical movement was influential in church design in France, Belgium Germany, Switzerland and the UK - where it was introduced in the 1950s. The New Churches Research Group was founded in 1957 in the UK to promote "a modern idiom appropriate to the ideas of the Liturgical Movement".[3] The NCRG was a group of Catholic and Anglican church architects and craftspeople who promoted liturgical reform of churches though publications such as The Tablet and Architects' Journal. The group was co-founded by Peter Hammond, Robert Maguire and Keith Murray (an ecclesiastical designer), and included architects Peter Gilbey, John Newton (Burles, Newton & Partners), Patrick Nuttgens, George Pace, Patrick Reyntiens (stained glass artist), Austin Winkley, Lance Wright, as well as Catholic priest and theologian Charles Davis.[4]

The Second Vatican Council saw the acceptance of many of the movement's ideas, resulting in a radical rethinking of design, expressing 'noble simplicity rather than sumptuous display'.[5] The turning points were the publication of Peter Hammond's Liturgy and Architecture, a critique of modern English church design, and the publication of Frederick Gibberd's design for the completion of Liverpool Metropolitan Cathedral.[6]

Reordering of churches[edit]

An example of reordering is St Joseph's church in Retford, which was designed by Ernest Bower Norris in modern Romanesque design, incorporating Art Deco elements. It opened in 1959 and in 1968 was re-ordered by Gerard Goalen to comply with the recommendations of Vatican II. During the re-order, Goalen commissioned a large Christus Resurrexit for the sanctuary wall by Steven Sykes.[7]

Building of new churches[edit]

The Catholic church became a major patron of modern architecture and art during the 1950s and 60s in the UK.[8] A group of modernist architects including Gillespie, Kidd & Coia, Gerard Goalen, Francis Pollen, Desmond Williams and Austin Winkley utilised contemporary design and construction methods to deliver the 'noble simplicity' instructed by Vatican II, literally to express the values of the Liturgical Movement in buildings.[9] Desmond Williams noted that his St Mary Dunstable church was "circular, with the object being to bring as many of the congregation near the altar, and proved very popular in attracting worshippers."[10] Maguire & Murray's St Paul's, Bow Common (1960) has not only been awarded Grade II* listed status[11] but was also voted best twentieth century church in the UK by the judges of the UK's Best Modern Churches competition (2013).[12]

Architects in this movement also collaborated with notable ceramic and glass artists such as Dom Charles Norris, Patrick Reyntiens and Steven Sykes.

Status of Modernist churches[edit]

Some of the churches built during this period are now being listed by Historic England in recognition of their outstanding modernist architecture and art. These include Goalen's Our Lady of Fatima, Harlow (Grade II listed, 1958),[13] St Mary Dunstable (Grade II listed, 1964),[14] Winkley's Church of St Margaret of Scotland, Twickenham (Grade II listed, 1969).[15]


The architecture of these churches was criticized by the architect Robert Maguire; he stated: "Gerard Goalen's T-shaped church of Our Lady of Fatima at Harlow, resplendent with its Buckfast Abbey glass. My only serious criticism of this – and it is serious – is that God's Holy People are divided, like All Gaul, into three parts."[16]

Return to traditional layouts[edit]

In the US, there has been a return to more traditional Catholic church layouts as a result of Pope Benedict's re-emphasising clerical distinctions. This has included revisiting pre-Liturgical Movement architecture in new construction and the renovation of modernist churches along traditionalist lines.[17] The traditional cruciform plan—which was largely absent from liturgical designs since Vatican II because of its fracturing effect on the assembly—has been incorporated into recent church buildings.[18]

Churches of the Lutheran tradition[edit]

The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, the largest Lutheran body in the United States, has also revived a greater appreciation of the liturgy and its ancient origins. Its clergy and congregations have adopted many traditional liturgical symbols, such as the sign of the cross, incense, and the full chasuble, which have become more common than in years past. While some freedom in style is exercised by individual congregations, the overall style of the aspects of liturgical worship – including vestments, altar adornments, and a general return of many formal practices – has become closer to the styles of the Roman Catholic and Anglican traditions.[19]

Anglican Communion[edit]

By the 20th century, the Church of England had made quite radical ceremonial and ritual changes, most of them incorporating revival of medieval Christian practice.[20]

The English Missal, published first in 1912, was a conflation of the Eucharistic rite in the 1662 prayer book and the Latin prayers of the Roman Missal, including the rubrics indicating the posture and manual acts. It was a recognition of practices which had been widespread for many years. The changes were the subject of controversy, opposition, hostility, and legal action.[21]

The revision effort that produced the failed 1928 proposed prayer book was based on medieval models, owing little to the researches or practices of continental scholars.[22] In the United States, William Palmer Ladd, who had visited a number of the European centers of Catholic scholarship and reform, introduced many of the ideas of the movement at the Berkeley Divinity School in New Haven. Ladd wrote a series of magazine columns (published as a book after his death titled Prayer Book Interleaves) that introduced much of the newer agenda to the Episcopal Church. While this American version of the movement had broad church roots, in England it was a new generation of scholars and clergy associated with the Catholic revival who led the next phase of discussion. With the publication in 1935 of Gabriel Hebert's Liturgy and Society, a debate in England began about the relationship between worship and the world as well as about the importance of eucharistic celebration and participation. Hebert, a Kelham Father, interpreted the liturgy on wider social principles, rejecting, for example the idea of the eucharistic fast as being impractical. Its members wished for more frequent communion, not merely attendance at Mass; they wanted to relate the eucharist to the world of ordinary life. Through its influence, the offertory was restored, though not without protracted controversy.[22][23][24]

Influence and criticisms[edit]

Horton M. Davies, a professor at Princeton University, states: "What is fascinating about (the liturgical) movement is that it has enabled Protestant churches to recover in part the Catholic liturgical heritage, while the Catholics seem to have appropriated the Protestant valuation of preaching, of shared worship in the vernacular tongue, and the importance of laity as the people of God."[25]

See also[edit]


Concepts and movements[edit]


  1. ^ Gassmann, Günther; Oldenburg, Mark W. (10 October 2011). Historical Dictionary of Lutheranism. Scarecrow Press. p. 236. ISBN 978-0-8108-7482-4.
  2. ^ Ernest Benjamin Koenker, The Liturgical Renaissance in the Roman Catholic Church (1954), p. 10
  3. ^ "CHURCH OF ST MARGARET OF SCOTLAND". Historic England.
  4. ^ Robert Proctor (2014). Building the Modern Church: Roman Catholic Church Architecture in Britain, 1955 to 1975. Routledge.
  5. ^ "CHURCH OF ST MARGARET OF SCOTLAND". Historic England.
  6. ^ The Architectural History Practice Limited for English Heritage (July 2014). "Twentieth-Century Roman Catholic Church Architecture in England, A Characterisation Study" (PDF).
  7. ^ "Retford – St Joseph". Taking Stock: Catholic Churches of England and Wales.
  8. ^ RW Proctor (2014). Building the Modern Church: Roman Catholic Church Architecture in Britain, 1955 to 1975.
  9. ^ "19th- and 20th-Century Roman Catholic Churches - Introductions to Heritage Assets". Historic England.
  10. ^ "Roman Catholic Church of St Mary, Dunstable designed by Desmond Williams OBE is listed at Grade II". EWA.
  11. ^ "Church Of St Paul". Historic England.
  12. ^ "Best Modern Churches winners announced". Twentieth Century Societey.
  13. ^ "CHURCH OF OUR LADY OF FATIMA". Historic England.
  14. ^ "Roman Catholic Church of St Mary". Historic England.
  15. ^ "CHURCH OF ST MARGARET OF SCOTLAND". Historic England.
  16. ^ Maguire, Robert (January 2002). "CHURCH DESIGN SINCE 1950" (PDF). Ecclesiology Today (23): 8.
  17. ^ Peter Feuerherd (13 April 2017). "New clericalism is imposing old ways on modern church architecture". National Catholic Reporter.
  18. ^ Michael E. DeSanctis (28 May 2012). "Upon This Foundation: Are new church designs taking us backward?". America, The Jesuit Review.
  19. ^ [1] Archived June 4, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
  20. ^ Contemporary commentators, such as Benjamin Jowett, saw the changes as indicative of Romantic and aesthetic influences (and 'revolting to the reverent mind'), but the models were Roman Catholic. Judith Pinnington, "Rubric and Spirit: a diagnostic reading of Tractarian Worship", in Essays Catholic and Radical, ed. Kenneth Leech and Rowan Williams (Bowerdean 1983) p. 98f; see also Valerie Pitt: "The Oxford Movement: a case of Cultural Distortion?", in Essays Catholic and Radical,, p. 205ff.
  21. ^ Chadwick, Owen The Victorian Church; vol. 2; Carpenter, S. C. Church and People (SPCK 1933); pp.212ff.
  22. ^ a b Gray, Donald, Earth and Altar, (Canterbury Press 1986); p. 196
  23. ^ Buchanan, Colin. The End of the Offertory (Grove Books)
  24. ^ Arguile, Roger. The Offering of the People (Jubilee, 1989)
  25. ^ O.C. Jr., Edwards. A History of Preaching. Abingdon Press. p. 746. ISBN 9780687038640. In the subtitle for the fifth volume of his history of Worship and Theology in England, Horton Davies refers to the twentieth century as the 'ecumenical century.' Nowhere is that more obvious than in attitudes toward Christian worship. As Davies said: 'What is fascinating about (the liturgical) movement is that it has enabled Protestant churches to recover in part the Catholic liturgical heritage, while the Catholics seem to have appropriated the Protestant valuation of preaching, of shared worship in the vernacular tongue, and the importance of laity as the people of God.'

Further reading[edit]

  • Bouyer, Louis (1955), Liturgical Piety, University of Notre Dame Press
  • Bouyer, Louis (2015), The Memoirs of Louis Bouyer: From Youth and Conversion to Vatican II, the Liturgical Reform, and After, Angelico Press, ISBN 978-1621381426
  • Chiron, Yves (2018), Annibale Bugnini: Reformer of the Liturgy, Angelico Press, ISBN 978-1621384113
  • Chupungco, Anscar J (1997), Handbook for Liturgical Studies: Introduction to the Liturgy, Liturgical Press.
  • Crichton, J D (1996), Lights in the Darkness: Fore-runners of the Liturgical Movement, Columba Press, ISBN 1856071529..
  • Dobszay, László (2003), The Bugnini-Liturgy and the Reform of the Reform, Church Music Association of America, ISBN 978-1607437246
  • Giampietro, Nicola (2010), The Development of the Liturgical Reform: As Seen by Cardinal Ferdinando Antonelli from 1948 to 1970, Roman Catholic Books, ISBN 978-1934888124
  • Grillo, Andrea (2013), Beyond Pius V: Conflicting Interpretations of the Liturgical Reform, Liturgical Press, ISBN 0814663028.
  • Guardini, Romano (1998), The Spirit of the Liturgy, Crossroad Publishing Company
  • Hayes, David (2009), In a Great and Noble Tradition: The Autobiography of Dom Prosper Gueranger (1805-1875), Founder of the Solesmes Congregation of Benedictine Monks and Nuns, Gracewing Publishing
  • Hebert, A G (1935), Liturgy and Society, Faber
  • Irwin, Kevin W (2014), What We Have Done, What We Have Failed to Do: Assessing the Liturgical Reforms of Vatican II, Paulist Press
  • Kocik, Thomas M (2016), Singing His Song: A Short Introduction to the Liturgical Movement, Chorabooks
  • Koenker, Ernest Benjamin (1951), Objectives and Achievements of the Liturgical Movement in the Roman Catholic Church since World War II, Church History 20, no 2
  • Koenker, Ernest Benjamin (1954), The Liturgical Renaissance in the Roman Catholic Church, University of Chicago Press
  • Marx, Paul (1957), Virgil Michel and the Liturgical Movement, Liturgical Press
  • Pecklers, Keith F (1998), The Unread Vision: The Liturgical Movement in the United States of America 1926-1955, Liturgical Press, ISBN 0814624502
  • Puglisi, James F (2005), Liturgical Renewal as a Way to Christian Unity, Pueblo Publishing Co, ISBN 081466203X
  • Reid, Alcuin (2004), The Organic Development of the Liturgy: The Principles of Liturgical Reform and Their Relation to the Twentieth Century Liturgical Movement Prior to the Second Vatican Council, St Michael's Abbey Press, ISBN 0907077439
  • Robinson, Jonathan (2005), The Mass and Modernity: Walking to Heaven Backward, Ignatius Press, ISBN 1586170694
  • Turner, Paul (2015), Whose Mass Is It?: Why People Care So Much about the Catholic Liturgy, Liturgical Press