Nigel Bridge, Baron Bridge of Harwich
||This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. (April 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
|The Right Honourable
Baron Bridge of Harwich
|Lord of Appeal in Ordinary|
|Lord Justice of Appeal|
|Born||26 February 1917|
|Died||20 November 2007(aged 90)|
|Children||1 son; 2 daughter|
Nigel Cyprian Bridge, Baron Bridge of Harwich, PC (26 February 1917 – 20 November 2007) was one of the leading British barristers and judges of the late 20th Century. He served as a Lord of Appeal in Ordinary, writing the opinion in famous cases such as The Queen v. Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame and Caparo v. Dickman. He is also notable for having been the also judge presiding over the Birmingham Six Trial.
|This section does not cite any sources. (December 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
Bridge's father was Commander Cyprian Dunscomb Charles Bridge of the Royal Navy. His mother was the daughter of a cotton manufacturer from Lancashire. His parents separated shortly after his birth. He followed his elder brother, Antony, to Marlborough College, winning a scholarship. His brother was later a painter before becoming a Church of England priest and latterly Dean of Guildford Cathedral. Bridge left Marlborough aged 17, and spent time in Europe, where he learned French and German.
He worked as a journalist on regional newspapers in Lancashire, and wrote an unpublished novel. He volunteered to join the Fleet Air Arm before the Second World War broke out, but was rejected as being colour blind. He was conscripted into the British Army in 1940, serving in the King's Royal Rifle Corps and GHQ Liaison Regiment, reaching the rank of Captain before being demobilised in 1946.
He married Margaret Swinbank, daughter of Leonard Heseltine Swinbank in 1944. They had two daughters and one son. His wife died in 2006.
|This section needs additional citations for verification. (November 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
Bridge was called to the Bar at Inner Temple in 1947, having achieved the first place in that year's bar exams. He became a pupil of Martin Jukes, and later practised as a Barrister-at-Law at 3 Temple Gardens from 1950, in the chambers headed by Lord Widgery, undertaking mainly personal injury work, but also town and country planning and local government law. He was made a Bencher at Inner Temple in 1964. He was later Reader in 1986 and Treasurer in 1986.
From 1964 to 1968, he was Junior Counsel to the Treasury (Common Law) (also known as "Treasury Devil"), as a sure route to the bench. He became a High Court Judge in 1968, joining the Queen's Bench Division, and was knighted. He was Presiding Judge of the Western Circuit from 1972-74.
Bridge was the presiding judge at the trial of the Birmingham six, who were accused of bombings in Birmingham in November 1974. In his last case before he joined the Court of Appeal, his summing up was criticised as being biased against the defendants, with him saying that there was "the clearest and most overwhelming evidence I have ever heard in a case of murder". The defendants served 16 years in prison before the convictions were quashed by the Court of Appeal in 1991 due to new evidence emerging - principally, that the defendants had been beaten by the police to secure their confessions (similar claims having been dismissed by Bridge at the original trial). Lord Lane, Lord Chief Justice, hearing the case on appeal, remarked that the reason the conviction succeeded at first instance was because the police "lied".
He became a Lord Justice of Appeal in 1975, and became a Privy Counsellor. He was a member of the Security Commission from 1977 and 1985, serving as chairman between 1982 and 1985, in which capacity he published a report into the vetting of staff at Buckingham Palace.
He became a Lord of Appeal in Ordinary in 1980, and was created a life peer with the title Baron Bridge of Harwich, of Harwich, in the County of Essex. He was the only Law Lord without a university degree. He was mooted as a successor to Lord Widgery as Lord Chief Justice in 1979, and to Lord Denning as Master of the Rolls in 1982, but did not secure either position. He joined Lord Oliver of Aylmerton in dissenting from the majority decision in the Spycatcher case in 1987. He criticised the government's case to prevent publication of the contents of Peter Wright's book as "ridiculous". He supported the majority decision in the Gillick case on medical consent in 1985, and in the McLoughlin v O'Brian case on recovery of damages for nervous shock.
|This section does not cite any sources. (May 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
His retirement from the bench in 1992 was compulsory, having reached the age of 75. He studied mathematical sciences in his retirement, partly to show that he retained his cognitive abilities, and obtained a Bachelor of Science degree from the Open University in 2003, aged 86.
- R v McIlkenney (1975)
- Spycatcher case (1987)
- McLoughlin v O'Brian  1 AC 410
- Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority  AC 1074
- Caparo Industries Plc. v Dickman  2 AC 605
- R v Secretary of State for Transport ex parte Factortame Ltd (No 2)  2 AC 85
- Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire  AC 310
- Murphy v Brentwood DC  AC 398
- Abbey National Building Society v Cann  1 AC 56
- Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset  1 AC 107
- Tools, Kevin (25 February 1990). "NYT, "When British Justice Failed"". New York Times. NYT. Retrieved 8 March 2017.
- Bridge, N.C (1982). Baron of Harwich. Report of an inquiry by the Right Honourable Lord Bridge of Harwich into the appointment as The Queen's Police Officer, and the activities of, Commander Trestrail; to determine whether security was breached or put at risk, and advise whether in consequence any change in security arrangements is necessary or desirable. HC59 (November). London: HMSO.