Jump to content

Low-energy house

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
See caption
A thermogram compares the heat radiation of the windows and walls of two buildings: a sustainable, low-energy passive house (right) and a conventional house

A low-energy house is characterized by an energy-efficient design and technical features which enable it to provide high living standards and comfort with low energy consumption and carbon emissions. Traditional heating and active cooling systems are absent, or their use is secondary.[1][2] Low-energy buildings may be viewed as examples of sustainable architecture. Low-energy houses often have active and passive solar building design and components, which reduce the house's energy consumption and minimally impact the resident's lifestyle. Throughout the world, companies and non-profit organizations provide guidelines and issue certifications to guarantee the energy performance of buildings and their processes and materials. Certifications include passive house, BBC—Bâtiment Basse Consommation—Effinergie (France), zero-carbon house (UK), and Minergie (Switzerland).[3]

Buildings alone were responsible for 38% of all human Greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) as of 2008, with 20% attributed to residential buildings and 18% to commercial buildings.[4] According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), buildings is the sector which presents the most cost effective opportunities for GHG reductions.[5]


During the 1970s, research on low-energy buildings was done in Denmark, Sweden, Germany, Canada, and the United States. The implementation of standardized low-energy building concepts has developed differently in each country.[6]


In the late 1970s, the province of Saskatchewan contracted the Saskatchewan Research Council to design and build a passive solar house suitable for the extreme climate of the Canadian prairies, where winter temperatures can drop to negative 40 degrees Celsius (-40°F).[7] The project resulted in the construction of the Saskatchewan Conservation House in Regina in 1977 by a team led by engineer Harold Orr.[8] The project developed a heat recovery air exchanger (HRV), hot water recovery, and a blower-door apparatus to measure building air-tightness, techniques that became common in low-energy building in other parts of the world.[9] Orr would go on to apply many of those techniques to retro-fitting existing buildings to improve energy efficiency.[10][11]


Triggered in the 1970s by the first energy crisis and growing environmental awareness, energy conservation became increasingly important in Germany.[12] In 1977, the country's first energy-related building standard was enacted. The German Passivhaus Institute introduced the first certified passive house in 1990. The annual heating requirement was introduced as an important parameter by the third German Thermal Insulation Ordinance (1995). In 2013, however, there was no clear legal requirement for a low-energy building standard in Germany. According to Maria Panagiotidou and Robert J. Fuller, definitions, policies and construction activity of zero-energy buildings must be clear.[13] The European Union's Energy Performance Directive requires that beginning in 2021, only low-energy buildings may be built.[14]

United Kingdom[edit]

Changes to national policies have occurred since May 2015 in the UK. One of the most significant has been the withdrawal of the Code for Sustainable Homes (CfSH) as a system for assessing and encouraging improvements in the environmental design of dwellings.[15] This has abandoned the code's schematic which provided a framework of achievement levels and to which low-energy designers could aspire to meet or surpass. Although energy-conservation legislation still exists in the building regulations,[16] there is a lack of suitable standards exceeding basic regulations. As a result, the Passive House Standard may expand its influence and impact on energy-efficient houses.[17]

United States[edit]

Interest in low-energy buildings has increased in the United States, primarily due to rising energy prices, decreasing costs for onsite renewable-energy systems, and increasing concern about climate change. California requires all new residential construction to be zero net energy by 2020.[1]


Low-energy houses are broadly defined, but are generally known as houses with a lower energy demand than common buildings regulated by the national building code. The term "low-energy house" is used in some countries for a specific type of building.[18]

A low-energy house is a guideline rarely specified in actual values (heat load or space-heating minimum). A passive house is a standard, with specific recommendations to save heating energy.

At one end of the spectrum are buildings with an ultra-low space-heating requirement which require low levels of imported energy (even in winter), approaching an autonomous building. At the opposite end are buildings where few attempts are made to reduce their space-heating requirement and which use high levels of imported energy in winter. Although this may be balanced by high levels of renewable-energy generation throughout the year, it imposes greater demands on the national energy infrastructure during winter.

National standards[edit]

The term "low-energy houses" may refer to national building standards.[19] These standards sometimes seek to limit the energy used for space heating, which is the largest energy consumer in many climate zones. Other energy uses may also be regulated. The history of passive solar building design provides an international view of one form of low-energy-building development and standards.


Standards for low-energy buildings in Europe have proceeded differently in each country, and there is no common certification or legislation for low-energy buildings valid in all EU member states. As a movement towards reducing energy use and emissions, a common legislation concerning buildings’ energy performance, the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) was published in 2002 and became effective in January 2003.[20]


In NS 3700, the draft official standard, low-energy buildings are defined. About the buildings' energy performance, two alternatives for rating their primary energy use are under discussion:

  • A limit on a building's annual CO2 emissions, calculated by multiplying the annual supplied energy by a CO2 factor
  • A percentage of its heating demand must be met with renewable energy.


Low-energy houses are defined in the National Building Regulation Building Regulations 08, and are divided into two classes. They are regulated in the regulations' chapter 7.2.4: Low-energy.


Low-energy houses certified by RAL-GZ 965 have 30 percent less heat losses than regulated in the EnEV, a national building code. Other criteria affect insulation, air tightness and ventilation. Low-energy buildings may be certified by RAL-GZ 965 for planning or construction.[18]


Low-energy buildings may receive the Minergie certification, a "quality label for new and refurbished buildings". The Minergie standard requires that buildings do not exceed 75 percent of average building energy consumption and fossil-fuel consumption must not exceed 50 percent of the average.[21]

North America[edit]

The European Union directive has clarified low-energy houses in Europe, and a large portion of the discussions on zero-energy building in North America derives from the U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).[22]

The Energy Star program is the largest certifier of low-energy homes and consumer products in the U.S. Although certified Energy Star homes use at least 15 percent less energy than standard new homes built in accordance with the International Residential Code, they typically achieve a 20- to 30-percent savings.[23] The United States Department of Energy introduced a program in 2008 to distribute zero-energy housing across the country.[24]

Canadian builders may use a range of standards, labels, and certification programs to demonstrate a high level of energy performance in a given project. These include:

In British Columbia the above programs align with the BC Energy Step Code, a provincial regulation to incentivize (or require) a level of energy efficiency in new construction beyond the base building code. The code was designed as a technical road map to help the province reach its target of all new net-zero-energy-ready buildings by 2032.

Obstacles and issues[edit]

Energy efficient housing affects indoor air quality. Airtight houses will trap pollutants inside them, whether produced indoors or outdoors, and lead to an increase in human exposure and potential health issues.[29][30]

Energy-efficient design often relies on new technologies and techniques. These may create technical obstacles in addition to social, cultural, and economic non-technical obstacles.[17]

Buildings designed for good energy efficiency do not always live up to the design goals; various reasons lead to this performance gap.


Low-energy building design is considered important to encourage resource efficiency and reduce global climate change associated with the burning of fossil fuels. Design involves two general strategies: minimizing the need for energy use in buildings (especially for heating and cooling) through energy-efficient measures (EEMs) and adopting renewable energy and other technologies (RETs) to meet remaining energy needs. EEMs include building envelopes, internal conditions, and building-services systems; RETs include photovoltaic or building-integrated photovoltaic, wind turbines, solar thermal (solar water heaters), heat pumps, and district heating and cooling. Impacts include life-cycle costs, environmental impacts, and climate-change and social-policy issues.[31] The best low-energy designs offer occupants a better environment and more stable, controlled thermal comfort in addition to reduced energy costs.

GHG emissions associated with buildings construction are mainly coming from:

  1. Materials manufacturing (e.g., concrete)
  2. Materials transport
  3. Demolition wastes transport
  4. Demolition wastes treatment

The construction, renovation, and deconstruction of a typical building is on average responsible for the emissions of 1,000–1,500 kg CO2e/m2 (around 500 kg CO2e/m2 for construction only).

Strategies adopted by low-carbon buildings to reduce GHG emissions during construction include:

  1. Reduce quantity of materials used
  2. Select materials with low emissions factors associated (e.g., recycled materials)
  3. Select materials suppliers as close as possible to the construction.
  4. Divert demolition wastes to recycling instead of landfills or incineration

Energy efficiency[edit]

Reduction of energy consumption is more environmentally and financially advantageous than increasing onsite production to reach a low-energy goal. The less a home consumes, the smaller renewable-energy system it requires to reach net zero. Energy efficiency should always be the primary design strategy of a low-energy house.[1]


Passive solar design and landscaping[edit]

Passive solar building design and energy-efficient landscaping support the low-energy house in conservation and can integrate it into a neighborhood and environment. Following passive solar building techniques, where buildings are compact in shape to reduce surface area and principal windows oriented towards the equator (south in the Northern Hemisphere and north in the Southern Hemisphere) maximizes passive solar gain. However, solar gain (especially in temperate climates) is secondary to minimizing the overall house-energy requirements. In hot temperatures, excess heat can create uncomfortable indoor conditions. Passive alternatives to air-conditioning systems, such as temperature-dependent venting, have been shown to be effective in regions with cooling needs.[32] Other techniques to reduce excess solar heat include brise-soleils, trees, attached pergolas with vines, vertical gardens, and green roofs.

Although low-energy houses can be constructed from dense or lightweight materials, internal thermal mass is normally incorporated to reduce summer peak temperatures, maintain stable winter temperatures, and prevent possible overheating in spring or autumn before the higher sun angle "shades" midday wall exposure and window penetration. Exterior wall color (when the surface allows choice) reflection or absorption depends on the predominant year-round outdoor temperature. The use of deciduous trees and wall trellised (or self-attaching) vines can assist in temperate climates.

Lighting and electrical appliances[edit]

To minimize total primary energy consumption, passive and active daylighting are the first daytime solutions to employ. For low-light days, non-daylight spaces and nighttime, sustainable lighting design with low-energy sources (such as standard-voltage compact fluorescent lamps and solid-state lighting with LED lamps, OLEDs and polymer light-emitting diodes and low-voltage incandescent light bulbs, compact metal halide, xenon and halogen lamps) can be used.

Solar-powered exterior security and landscape lighting, with solar cells on each fixture or connecting to a central solar panel, are available for gardens and outdoor needs. Low-voltage systems can be used for more controlled (or independent) illumination, using less electricity than conventional fixtures and lamps. Timers, motion detection and daylighting operation sensors further reduce energy consumption and light pollution.

Home appliances meeting independent energy-efficiency testing and receiving Ecolabel certification marks for reduced electrical and natural-gas consumption and product-manufacturing carbon emission labels are preferred for low-energy houses. Energy Star and EKOenergy are other certification marks.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b c Thomas, Walter D.; Duffy, John J. (2013-12-01). "Energy performance of net-zero and near net-zero energy homes in New England". Energy and Buildings. 67: 551–558. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.047. ISSN 0378-7788.
  2. ^ Weißenberger, Markus; Jensch, Werner; Lang, Werner (2014-06-01). "The convergence of life cycle assessment and nearly zero-energy buildings: The case of Germany". Energy and Buildings. 76: 551–557. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.03.028. ISSN 0378-7788.
  3. ^ "International Passive House Association | Criteria". passivehouse-international.org. Retrieved 2019-04-07.
  4. ^ U.S. EPA. 2008. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gases Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2006, p. ES8.
  5. ^ IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007 Synthesis Report, p. 59.
  6. ^ "European Embedding of Passive Houses" (PDF). pibp.pl. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
  7. ^ Huck, Nichole (2015-08-05). "'Passive home' movement a success in Germany, but not in Saskatchewan where it started". CBC News. Archived from the original on 2017-01-02. Retrieved 2023-10-08.
  8. ^ Orr, Harold (2020-10-05). "The principal designer of the house that inspired the global Passivhaus movement reflects on the project that started it all". EcoHome. Retrieved 2023-10-08.
  9. ^ Procter, Don (2017-11-29). "Passive house on the prairie, the Saskatchewan Conservation House". Journal of Commerce. Retrieved 2023-10-08.
  10. ^ Holladay, Martin (2009-08-14). "The History of the Chainsaw Retrofit". Green Building Advisor. Archived from the original on 2018-10-16. Retrieved 2023-10-08.
  11. ^ Henry, Mike (2013-08-09). "Harold Orr's Superinsulated Retrofits". The Sustainable Home. Archived from the original on 2017-03-11. Retrieved 2023-10-08.
  12. ^ "Basiswissen Bauphysik" (PDF). newbooks-services.de. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
  13. ^ Panagiotidou, Maria; Fuller, Robert J. (2013-11-01). "Progress in ZEBs—A review of definitions, policies and construction activity". Energy Policy. 62: 196–206. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.099. ISSN 0301-4215.
  14. ^ "32010L0031 - Richtlinie (EU) 31/2010". jurion.de. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
  15. ^ "2010 to 2015 government policy: energy efficiency in buildings". GOV.UK. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
  16. ^ "Conservation of fuel and power: Approved Document L". GOV.UK. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
  17. ^ a b Pitts, Adrian (February 2017). "Passive House and Low Energy Buildings: Barriers and Opportunities for Future Development within UK Practice". Sustainability. 9 (2): 272. doi:10.3390/su9020272.
  18. ^ a b "Low-energy buildings in Europe – standards, criteria and consequences". lup.lub.lu.se. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
  19. ^ Raad Z. Homod, (2014) 'Assessment regarding energy saving and decoupling for different AHU (air handling unit) and control strategies in the hot-humid climatic region of Iraq' Energy, 74 (2014) 762-774
  20. ^ European Commission, "DIRECTIVE 2002/91/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings", Official Journal of the European Communities, 2003
  21. ^ "Minergie Schweiz". Retrieved 2018-12-10.
  22. ^ Cole, Raymond J.; Fedoruk, Laura (2015). "Shifting from net-zero to net-positive energy buildings". Building Research & Information. 43: 111–120. doi:10.1080/09613218.2014.950452. S2CID 108636555.
  23. ^ "Features of ENERGY STAR Qualified New Homes." - EnergyStar.gov, Retrieved 7 March 2008.
  24. ^ "About Builders Challenge." Archived 2011-09-03 at the Wayback Machine - March 2008. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved 7 March 2008.
  25. ^ "Net Zero Home Labelling Program". Retrieved May 18, 2019.
  26. ^ "About Our Programs". Built Green Canada. Retrieved May 18, 2019.
  27. ^ "Energy Star Certified Homes". Natural Resources Canada. 2011-03-15. Retrieved May 18, 2019.
  28. ^ "Canadian Passive House Institute". Retrieved May 18, 2019.
  29. ^ Niculita-Hirzel, Hélène (March 16, 2022). "Latest Trends in Pollutant Accumulations at Threatening Levels in Energy-Efficient Residential Buildings with and without Mechanical Ventilation: A Review". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19 (6): 3538. doi:10.3390/ijerph19063538. ISSN 1660-4601. PMC 8951331. PMID 35329223.
  30. ^ UK Health Security Agency (2024) [1 September 2012]. "Chapter 5: Impact of climate change policies on indoor environmental quality and health in UK housing". Health Effects of Climate Change (HECC) in the UK: 2023 report (published 15 January 2024).
  31. ^ Li, Danny H.W.; Yang, Liu; Lam, Joseph C. (2013-06-01). "Zero energy buildings and sustainable development implications – A review". Energy. 54: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.070. ISSN 0360-5442.
  32. ^ Reda, F., Tuominen, P., Hedman, Å., Ibrahim, M.G.E.: "Low-energy residential buildings in New Borg El Arab: Simulation and survey based energy assessment". Energy and Buildings, Volume 93, 15 April 2015, pp. 65-82.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]