|Died||July 29, 1956 (aged 83)|
|Awards||Goethe Medal for Art and Science (1932)|
|Aesthetics, anthropology, classical studies, eroticism, handwriting, intellectual history, metaphysics, philosophy of history, philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, poetry, psychology|
|Co-founder of||Munich Cosmic Circle|
|Fields||Theoretical psychology, characterology, chemistry|
|Thesis||Attempt at a Synthesis of Menthone (1901)|
|Doctoral advisor||Alfred Einhorn|
|Other academic advisors||Theodore Lipps|
Friedrich Konrad Eduard Wilhelm Ludwig Klages (10 December 1872 – 29 July 1956) was a German philosopher, psychologist, poet, writer, and lecturer, who was a two-time nominee for the Nobel Prize in Literature. In the Germanic world, he is considered one of the most important thinkers of the 20th century. He began his career as a research chemist according to his family's wishes, though soon returned to his passions for poetry, philosophy and classical studies. He held a post at the University of Munich, where in 1905 he founded the Psychodiagnostisches Seminar; the latter was forced to close in 1914 with the outbreak of World War I. In 1915, Klages moved to neutral Switzerland, where over the following decades much of his mature philosophical works were written. Klages died in 1956.
Klages was a central figure of characterological psychology and the Lebensphilosophie school of thought. Prominent elements of his philosophy include: the opposition between life-affirming Seele and life-denying Geist; reality as the on-going creation and interpretation of sensory images, rather than feelings; a biocentric ethics in response to modern ecological issues and militarism; an affirmation of eroticism in critique of both Christian patriarchy and the notion of the "sexual"; a theory of psychology focused on expression, including handwriting analysis; and a science of character aimed at reconciling the human ego to the divide it effectuates between living beings. Central to Klages' thought is a linguistic opposition to logocentrism, a term introduced by Klages to diagnose a fixation on language or words to the detriment of the things to which they refer. His formulation of this concept came to be of significant importance to semiotic studies of Western science and philosophy, namely within Derridean deconstruction. Klages is similarly seen as a forebear to critical theory, deep ecology, and existential phenomenology.
Klages' place in modern psychology has been likened to those of his contemporaries Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung. His philosophy was roundly attacked by Nazi leaders during the height of his career, though his proximity has since fallen to dispute. Though little of his literary output has historically been available in English, Klages' thought has exhibited sweeping influence on German developments in psychology, psychiatry, literature, and various other disciplines.
Klages was born on 10 December 1872, in Hannover, Germany, the son of Friedrich Ferdinand Louis Klages, a businessman and former military officer, and wife Marie Helene née Kolster. In 1878, his sister Helene Klages was born and the two shared a strong bond throughout their lives. In 1882, when Klages was nine years old, his mother died. The death is thought to have been the result of pneumonia. Klages had begun attending school at the Lyceum am Georgsplatz (later called the Kaiser-Wilhelm-und-Ratsgymnasium) in Hannover, when his aunt, Ida Kolster, soon came to live with them to help raise the children, in keeping with the dying mother's request. Klages' early education was marked by a traditional emphasis on the classics and humanities. He quickly developed a strong interest in both prose and poetry writing, as well as in Greek and Germanic antiquity. His relationship with his father was strained by the latter's strictness and will to discipline him. Nevertheless, attempts to forbid Klages from writing poetry were unsuccessful by both his teachers and parents.
Klages developed an intense childhood friendship with classmate Theodor Lessing, with whom he shared many passionate interests. Klages fought to maintain their friendship in spite of his father's anti-semitism. According to Lessing, "Ludwig's father did not view his son's fraternization with 'Juden' as acceptable." In 1891, Klages completed his Abitur-level schooling and continued to Leipzig University, where he began his studies in physics and chemisty. His father had instructed him to pursue a career in industrial chemistry. He took two semesters at Leipzig, during 1891–1892, then one semester at the Technische Hochschule Hannover (now the University of Hannover), during 1892–1893.
Klages moved to Munich in 1893, continuing his undergraduate degree at Munich University. The same year, he joined the Chemisches Institut, a laboratory founded at the University by Adolf von Baeyer in 1975. Alongside his studies, he engaged in the cultural scene in Schwabing, the Bohemian district of Munich. In 1894, Klages met poet and sculptor Hans Busse, who had recently founded the Institut für wissenschaftliche Graphologie (Institute for Scientific Graphology). Handwriting analysis, or graphology, was at that time a more reputable discipline than now; Busse was sought on occasion to give expert testimony in court cases, and his passion for the subject drew Klages to him. Others figures who entered Klages life at this time include psychiatrist Georg Meyer, poet Stefan George, classicist Alfred Schuler, and novelist Franziska zu Reventlow.
After graduating, Klages continued his work as a research chemist and began preparing his doctoral thesis under Alfred Einhorn. Klages' writings in both prose and poetry began appearing in Blätter für die Kunst, a journal publication owned by Stefan George, who himself had eagerly recognized Klages' talent. In 1896, Klages, Meyer, and Busse founded a new graphological institution, the Deutsche Graphologische Gesellschaft (German Graphological Society). Klages' childhood friendship with Theodor Lessing came to a bitter end in 1899. Both would later write about the depth of their relationship and influence on each other—though many aspects, such as the effect race had on their friendship, remain unclear.
In 1900, Klages received his doctorate in chemistry from the University of Munich; since chemistry had seven years earlier moved from the medical faculty, Klages received his qualification as a philosophy doctorate (PhD) rather than a medical doctorate (MD). Klage published his thesis Attempt at a Synthesis of Menthone in 1901.
In 1914 at the outbreak of war Klages moved to Switzerland and supported himself with his writing and income from lectures. He returned to Germany in the 1920s and in 1932 was awarded the Goethe medal for Art and Science. However, by 1936 he was under attack from Nazi authorities for lack of support and on his 70th birthday in 1942 was denounced by many newspapers in Germany. After the war he was honoured by the new government, particularly on his 80th birthday in 1952.
This section may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: it may be inaccurate, incomplete or in need of reorganization to comply with Wikipedia's layout guidelines. (September 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Klages' thought is often seen as the link between Friedrich Nietzsche and much of contemporary continental philosophy, with even Klages once regarding his as "the most plundered" body of work of the present age. Jürgen Habermas, who regarded Klages as well ahead of his time, describes his philosophy as "anti-spiritual" (German: geistfeindlichen). In this regard, Klages is also seen as a pioneering figure of critique against the Hegelian notion of spirit as adverse to the affirmation of life.
He created a complete theory of graphology and will be long associated with the concepts of form level, rhythm and bi-polar interpretation. Together with Friedrich Nietzsche and Henri Bergson he anticipated existential phenomenology. He also coined the term logocentrism in the 1920s.
As a philosopher, Klages took the Nietzschean premises of Lebensphilosophie "to their most extreme conclusions." He drew a distinction between life-affirming Seele (soul) and life-destroying Geist (spirit or intellect). Geist represented the forces of "modern, industrial, and intellectual rationalization", while Seele represented the possibility of overcoming "alienated intellectuality in favor of a new-found earthly rootedness." After his death, the German philosopher Jürgen Habermas urged that Klages' developments in the fields of anthropology and philosophy of language should not be left veiled behind his enigmatic metaphysics and apocalyptic philosophy of history. Habermas characterized Klages' thought in this regard as ahead of its time.
Klages influence was widespread and amongst his great admirers were contemporaries like Jewish thinker Walter Benjamin, philosopher Ernst Cassirer, philologist Walter F. Otto and novelist Hermann Hesse.
Relationships and sexuality
In uniting his philosophy and personal preferences, Klages generally opposed sexuality as a formal concept. Even during the heyday of sexual and bohemian rebellion, Herf writes, "Klages struck most observers as strikingly clean and honourable in erotic matters."
When Klages moved into a new Schwabing flat in 1895, he entered into an intense sexual relationship with his landlady's daughter, with the mother's approval; the daughter, whom Klages called 'Putti', was eleven years younger than him, and their relationship continued for almost two decades though remained only sexual in nature. During his years in Schwabing, Klages also became romantically involved with novelist Franziska zu Reventlow, which was further alluded to in her 1913 roman à clef Herrn Dames Aufzeichnungen. Both Stefan George and Alfred Schuler, with whom Klages closely associated, were openly homosexual men. Whilst some of Klages' outward statements on homosexuality may be seen as harsh, he maintained an intimate personal and academic admiration for Schuler all throughout his life.
Religion and political views
Klages, like Friedrich Nietzsche, was critical of Christianity as well as what they both saw as its roots in Judaism. Some of his earlier statements on Judaism in this regard may be seen as only veiled attacks on Christianity, drawing further similarities to Nietzsche and Voltaire. "On one level, it is possible to see in Klages a call for a return to polytheism or pantheism, inasmuch [as] there are significant affinities between his outlook and the cosmogony of the ancient Greeks, who saw each individual part of the world in pantheist and pagan terms", writes contemporary scholar Bishop; he concludes however, that Klages' religious views in this regard "must remain an open question". Other sources, such as by Josephson-Storm, have more overtly regarded Klages as a neo-pagan.
Klages has largely been identified as apolitical, with resemblances to deep ecology in his bioethical stance, feminism in his rejection of Christian patriarchy, and pacifism in his staunch anti-war position on German involvement in World Wars I and II. Despite his opposition to fascist militarism, among the most common charges against Klages is the misconception that he sympathised with Nazism. Attempts have been made to dismiss Klages on these grounds for his inclusion of anti-semitic remarks, while under the rule of the Third Reich, in the foreword to a 1940 publication of the late Alfred Schuler's Nachlass. Klages is also sometimes placed among thinkers of the Conservative Revolution. Klages was however, as Bishop states, "not a fundamentally anti-semitic thinker, not a right-wing philosopher, and not a Nazi." Earlier publishings by scholars Lebovic, Stauth, and Turner regard Klages as antisemitic. Likewise, historian Josephson-Storm states "As an American Jew who lost extended family in the Shoah, I personally find this the most disgusting and odious part of Klages’s oeuvre." Bishop further states that such views on Klages can be traced back to polemical interpretations fowarded by Ernst Bloch and Georg Lukács, and later embraced by the European New Right. Addressing the issue of anti-semitism, Klages wrote:
I have never endorsed the claim that the Nazi big-wigs belonged to a superior race. However, I must also add that I have consistently refused to accept the claim of another such race as the chosen people. The arrogance is identical in both cases, but with this important distinction: after waging war against mankind for more than three thousand years, Judaism has finally achieved total victory over all nations of the earth.
Klages wrote 14 books and 60 articles (1910–1948), and co-edited the journals Berichte (1897–1898) and its successor Graphologische Monatshefte until 1908.
Translated works in English
- — (1922). Of Cosmogonic Eros [Vom kosmogonischen Eros]. Translated by Kuhn, Mav. Theion Publishing (published 2019). ISBN 978-3-9820-6540-3.
- — (1926). The Science of Character [Grundlagen der Charakterkunde]. Translated by Johnston, Walter H. (translated from the 5th & 6th ed.). London: Unwin Brothers (published 2018).
- — (n.d.). The Biocentric Worldview: Selected Essays and Aphorisms. Translated by Pryce, Joseph D. Arktos Media (published 2013). ISBN 978-1-9071-6661-7.
- — (n.d.). Cosmogonic Reflections: Selected Aphorisms. Translated by Pryce, Joseph D. Arktos Media (published 2015). ISBN 978-1-9105-2441-1.
Selected works in German
- Die Grundlagen der Charakterkunde (1926)
- Vom kosmogonischen Eros (1921)
- Der Geist als Widersacher der Seele (1929–32)
- Lebovic 2013, p. 9.
- Pryce 2013, § Works of maturity.
- Bishop 2017, p. 3.
- Bishop 2017, p. 6; Stauth & Turner 1992, p. 48.
- Lebovic 2013, p. 24.
- Bishop 2017, p. 24.
- Bishop 2017, p. 78.
- Josephson-Storm 2017, pp. 214–215.
- Lebovic 2013, p. 87; Wolin 2004, p. 154.
- Josephson-Storm 2017, pp. 214–215; Lebovic 2013, p. 75.
- White 1967; Britannica n.d.: "Ludwig Klages, (born Dec. 10, 1872, Hannover, Ger.—died July 29, 1956, Kilchberg, near Zürich, Switz.), German psychologist and philosopher, distinguished in the field of characterology."; "Nomination Database: Ludwig Klages". NobelPrize.org. Nobel Media AB. Retrieved 2017-04-19.
- L'Agora 2014.
- Bishop 2017, pp. 3, 7, 16; Lebovic 2013, p. 24; Stauth & Turner 1992, p. 48; Britannica n.d.: "Educated in chemistry, physics, and philosophy at the University of Munich, where he also taught".
- Josephson-Storm 2017, p. 213.
- Josephson-Storm 2017.
- Lebovic 2013, p. 119.
- White 1967: "His most important work was directed toward the formulation of a science of character that would reestablish the undifferentiated union of the life forms that had been ruptured by the emergence of ego in the human species."
- Beyler 2015: "Alongside characterology and graphology, Klages's most prominent philosophical theme was the rejection of technical rationality and intellectualized concepts. In other words, opposition to “logocentrism,” a term he coined."; Collins 2014.
- Josephson-Storm 2017, p. 221; Lebovic 2013, p. 87.
- Josephson-Storm 2017, pp. 20, 209; Stauth & Turner 1992.
- Bishop 2017; L'Agora 2014.
- Bishop 2017, p. 32: "Difficult, because one of the most commonly heard charges made against Klages is that he sympathized with the National Socialists. As we shall see, however, nothing could be further from the truth."; Pryce 2013, § National Socialist Germany, World War II, and their aftermath; Schlicht 2020.
- Bishop 2017, pp. i–xxiii, 91.
- Bishop 2017, p. 1.
- Bishop 2017, pp. 1–2.
- Bishop 2017, p. 2.
- Bishop 2017, p. 3; Lebovic 2013, p. 23.
- Bishop 2017, pp. 2–3; Pryce 2013, § The early years.
- Pryce 2013, § The early years.
- Bishop 2017, p. 3; Lebovic 2013, p. 24.
- Bishop 2017, p. 3; Pryce 2013, § The early years.
- Bishop 2017, p. 5.
- Bishop 2017, pp. 5, 13; Pryce 2013, § The early years.
- Kotowski 2000, p. 7.
- Bishop 2017, p. 3; Lebovic 2013, p. 25; White 1967.
- Bishop 2017, p. xvii.
- Der Spiegel 1966.
- Bishop 2017, p. 51; Josephson-Storm 2017.
- Josephson-Storm 2017, pp. 214, 221–222.
- Aschheim 1992, pp. 80–81.
- Bishop 2017, p. 93.
- Lebovic 2013, p. 94.
- Bishop 2017, pp. 3–4; Lebovic 2013, p. 60.
- Lebovic 2013, p. 60.
- Bishop 2017, p. 4; Pryce 2013, § The early years.
- Lebovic 2013, pp. 45, 88.
- Lebovic 2013; Pryce 2013, § The early years.
- Bishop 2017, pp. 24, 35.
- Bishop 2017, p. 102.
- Josephson-Storm 2017, p. 20.
- Josephson-Storm 2017; Pryce 2013, § Works of maturity.
- Bishop 2017, p. 32: "Difficult, because one of the most commonly heard charges made against Klages is that he sympathized with the National Socialists. As we shall see, however, nothing could be further from the truth."
- Bishop 2017, p. 35.
- Lebovic 2013.
- Bishop 2017, p. xix.
- Lebovic 2013; Stauth & Turner 1992.
- Josephson-Storm 2017, p. 225.
- Bishop 2017, pp. xviii–xix.
- Schroder 1966, § 1350.
- Aschheim, Steven E. (1992). The Nietzsche Legacy in Germany, 1890–1990. University of California Press. ISBN 0520085558.
- Beyler, Richard H. (2015). "Review: The Philosophy of Life and Death: Ludwig Klages and the Rise of a Nazi Biopolitics by Nitzan Lebovic". The American Historical Review. 120 (3): 1135–1136. doi:10.1093/ahr/120.3.1135.
- Bishop, Paul (2017). Ludwig Klages and the Philosophy of Life: A Vitalist Toolkit. Routledge. ISBN 9781138697157.
- Eller, Cynthia (2000). The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory: Why An Invented Past Will Not Give Women a Future. Beacon Press. ISBN 978-0-8070-6792-5.
- Furness, Raymond (1978). The Twentieth Century 1890–1945. London: Croom Helm. ISBN 006492310X.
- Josephson-Storm, Jason (2017). The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226403533.
- Kotowski, Elke-Vera (2000). Feindliche Dioskuren: Theodor Lessing und Ludwig Klages, das Scheitern einer Jugendfreundschaft (1885–1899) (in German). Berlin: Jüdische Verlagsanstalt. ISBN 978-3-93465-8097.
- Lebovic, Nitzan (2013). The Philosophy of Life and Death: Ludwig Klages and the Rise of a Nazi Biopolitics. Palgrave Studies in Cultural and Intellectual History. AIAA. ISBN 978-1137342058.
- Lindenfeld, David F.; Marchand, Suzanne L. (2004). Germany at the Fin de Siècle: Culture, Politics, and Ideas. Louisiana State University Press. ISBN 0807129798.
- Noll, Richard (1997). The Jung Cult: Origins of a Charismatic Movement. Touchstone. ISBN 0684834235.
- Pryce, Joseph D. (2013). "The Biocentric Metaphysics of Ludwig Klages". The Biocentric Worldview: Selected Essays and Aphorisms. By Klages, Ludwig. Translated by Pryce, Joseph D. Arktos Media. ISBN 978-1-9071-6661-7.
- Schlicht, Laurens (2020). "Graphology in Germany in the 1920s and 1930s". NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin. 28 (2): 149–179. doi:10.1007/s00048-020-00246-8. PMID 32333033.
- Schroder, Hans Eggert (1966). Ludwig Klages, Die Geschichte Seines Lebens (in German) (published 1992). ISBN 978-3-41600-8501.
- Stauth, Georg; Turner, Bryan S. (1992). "Ludwig Klages (1872-1956) and the Origins of Critical Theory". Theory Culture Society. 9 (45): 45–63. doi:10.1177/026327692009003003. S2CID 143602617.
- White, Hayden V. (1967). "Klages, Ludwig". Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 5 (2nd ed.). Macmillan Library Reference (published 2005). pp. 77–78.
- Wolin, Richard (2004). The Seduction of Unreason: The Intellectual Romance with Fascism from Nietzsche to Postmodernism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691114644.
- "logocentrism". Collins English Dictionary (Complete and Unabridged, 12th ed.). HarperCollins Publishers. 2014. Retrieved September 26, 2020 – via TheFreeDictionary.com.
- "Ludwig Klages". Encyclopædia Britannica. n.d. Retrieved September 27, 2020 – via Britannica.com.
- "Klages, Ludwig". Encyclopédie de L'Agora (in French). 2014.
- "Klages: Gewalten des Untergangs". Der Spiegel (in German) (37/1966). 5 September 1966.
- Alksnis, Gunnar (1970). Ludwig Klages and His Attack on Rationalism. Kansas State University. (republished as Chthonic Gnosis: Ludwig Klages and his Quest for the Pandaemonic All. Theion Publishing. 2015.)
- Falter, Reinhard (2003). Ludwig Klages. Lebensphilosophie als Zivilisationskritik (in German). Munich: Telesma. ISBN 978-3-8330-0678-4.
- Furness, Raymond (2000). "Ludwig Klages". Zarathustra's Children: A Study of a Lost Generation of German Writers. Rochester, NY: Camden House. pp. 99–124. ISBN 1-57113-057-8.
- Grossheim, Michael (1993). Ludwig Klages und die Phaenomenologie (in German). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH.
- Lebovic, Nitzan (2006). "The Terror and Beauty of Lebensphilosophie: Ludwig Klages, Walter Benjamin, and Alfred Bauemler". South Central Review. The Johns Hopkins University Press. 23 (1): 23–39. doi:10.1353/scr.2006.0009. JSTOR 40039911. S2CID 170637814.
- Lewin, James (1931). Geist und Seele: Ludwig Klages' Philosophie (in German). Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.
- Schneider, Tobias (2001). Ideological Trench Warfare: Ludwig Klages and National Socialism from 1933–1938. Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte.
- Tuppini, Tommaso (2003). Ludwig Klages: L'immagine e la questione della distanza (in Italian). Milano: Franco Angeli.
- Ardic, Chiara Gianni (2016). La Fuga degli Dèi: Mito, matriarcato e immagine in Ludwig Klages (in Italian). Milano: Jouvence.
|Wikiquote has quotations related to: Ludwig Klages|
- Online text: The Science of Character. Translated by Johnston, Walter H.
- Online text: The Biocentric Worldview: Selected Essays and Aphorisms. Translated by Pryce, Joseph D.
- Pryce, Joseph D. (August 26, 2010). "Ludwig Klages on Judaism, Christianity and Paganism". Occidental Observer.
- Alksnis, Gunnar. Chthonic Gnosis: Ludwig Klages and his Quest for the Pandaemonic All at Theion Publishing
- Klages, Ludwig. Of Cosmogonic Eros at Theion Publishing
- Newspaper clippings about Ludwig Klages in the 20th Century Press Archives of the ZBW