Madheshi people (Nepali: मधेशी) is a term used for several groups of people living in the Terai region of Nepal, literally meaning the people of Madhesh. It has also been used as a political pejorative term by the Pahari people of Nepal to refer to non-pahari people with a non-Nepali language as their mother tongue, regardless of their place of birth or residence.: 2 The term Madheshi became a widely recognised name for Nepali citizens with an Indian cultural background only after 1990. Madheshi people comprise various cultural groups such as Hindu caste groups, Muslims, Marwaris, Brahmin and Dalit caste groups, ethnic groups like Maithils, Bhojpuri, Awadhi and Bajjika speaking people and indigenous people of the Terai.: 68 Many of these groups share cultural traditions, educational and family ties with people living south of the international border in Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal.: 131 Tharu people and Pahari people living in the Terai do not consider themselves as Madheshi. In recent times, some politicians and journalists use the term for all Nepali citizens of the Terai.
The word madhesh is thought to be derived from the Sanskrit madhya desh (मध्य देश), literally the middle country, which refers to "the central region, the country lying between the Himalaya and the Vindhya mountains". However, in the context of Nepal, Madhesh refers to the region in the Nepal Terai located south of the Siwalik Hills.: 2
The term Madheshi people has been used for people of Indian ancestry residing in the Nepal Terai comprising various cultural groups such as Hindu caste groups, Muslims, Marwaris and indigenous people of the Terai.: 68 Madhesh has also been defined as the cultural and linguistic space existing as a basis for identity among the people of the Terai. Since the late 1940s, the term 'Madhes' was used by politicians in the Nepal Terai to differentiate between the interests of the people of the Terai and of the hills.
History of Indian immigration to the Nepal Terai
Indian migrants from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar settled foremost in the eastern Nepal Terai since the late 18th century, when the Shah rulers of Nepal encouraged deforestation and agricultural development of this region.
Since the late 18th century, the Shah rulers of Nepal encouraged people living in India to settle in the eastern Terai through a series of subsidies granted to new settlers. In the 1770s to 1780s, famine-stricken Bihari farmers migrated to the Nepal Terai following a severe flood of the Koshi River and subsequent drought. They converted forests to agricultural land. To promote the economic development of the Nepal Terai, people from the hills were invited to settle, but only a few moved to the Terai. Between the 1860s and 1951, people from India immigrated and settled in the region.: 62 Immigration of Indian farmers and labourers was particularly high during the rule of the Rana dynasty between 1846 and 1950. They settled foremost in the eastern Nepal Terai together with native Terai peoples. This increased immigration facilitated the expansion of cultivated land, which provided revenue for the state in the form of taxes by farmers, duties for felling and export of timber, and fees for the grazing of cattle on pastures during dry seasons. In the mid 19th century, Muslim people from the Awadh region were invited to settle in the far-western Nepal Terai, where they received large forested areas for conversion to agriculture. People of at least 21 Indian ethnic groups immigrated between 1933 and 1966.
In 1952, a Nepal Citizenship Act was passed that entitled all those immigrants to obtain Nepali citizenship who had stayed in the country for at least five years. The Citizenship Act of 1963 entitled immigrants to receive Nepali citizenship if they were able to read and write Nepali and engaged in business. In 1981, the Indian Ministry of Foreign Affairs estimated that about 3.2 million people of Indian origin lived in Nepal, of which about 2.4 million had received Nepali citizenship. In 2006, the Nepal Citizenship Act was amended to the effect that people born before 1990 and residing permanently in the country obtained the right to Nepali citizenship. About 2.3 million people received citizenship certificates.: 4 The Constitution of Nepal 2015 contains provisions for a Nepali citizenship by naturalisation, which can be acquired by:
- foreign women who are married to a Nepali man.
- children of a Nepali woman and a foreign man.
Demographics of the Nepal Terai
With 33,998.8 km2 (13,127.0 sq mi), the Nepal Terai constitutes 23.1% of Nepal's land area. As of 2001, about 48.5% of Nepal's population lived in the Terai, which had a population density of 330.78/km2 (856.7/sq mi), the highest in the country. As of June 2011, the Nepal Terai's human population totaled 13,318,705 people comprising more than 120 different ethnic groups and castes.
Since the late 1940s, the term 'Madhes' was used by politicians in the Nepal Terai to differentiate between the interests of the people of the Terai and of the hills. At the time, Indian and Madheshi people needed a passport to travel to Kathmandu, a requirement in place until 1958. In the 1950s, the regional political party Nepal Terai Congress advocated more autonomy for the Terai, recognition of Hindi as a national language and increasing employment opportunities for Madheshi people. During 1961 to 1990, the Panchayat government enforced a policy of assimilating diverse cultural groups into a pan-Nepali identity. Legal directives made it an offense to address inequality and discrimination of ethnic groups. The complexities of ethnopolitical conflicts between immigrants, caste groups and indigenous groups living in the Terai were not addressed.
After the Panchayat regime was abolished following the People's Movement in spring 1990, disadvanted groups demanded a more equitable share of political resources such as admittance to civil service. Madheshi people are disadvantaged in regards to access to education; literacy rate among Madheshi people is lower than among other groups in Nepal, and lowest among Madheshi Dalits. They are also disappointed to have been excluded from participation in bureaucracy, Nepal Army and political parties in Nepal. Madheshi identity is largely based on the experience of being discriminated by the country's ruling elites.: 40
The Nepal Sadbhawana Party is the oldest Madheshi party, which started lobbying for socio-cultural, linguistic and political rights of Madheshi people in the 1990s. The discussions on rights and demands of Madheshi people increased after the end of the Nepalese Civil War, in particular among Madheshi intellectuals and political elites. The political parties Janatantrik Terai Mukti Morcha and Madhesi Jana Adhikar Forum advocated the idea of an autonomous Madhes province stretching all over the Terai and organised violent demonstrations in 2007 to enforce their demands. The United Democratic Madhesi Front formed by Madheshi organizations pressured the government to accept this concept of autonomy under the motto "One Madhes One Pradesh". Several ethnic and religious groups in the Terai opposed and resisted this policy under the leadership of Madheshi parties, foremost Tharu and Muslim people.
The Tharu people were initially comfortable with the Madheshi identity in the eastern part of the Terai as of 2007, but in the central part, they claim a distinct Tharu identity.: 2 In 2009, they disassociated themselves from being identified as Madheshi and demanded their own province.
Armed groups like Terai Army, Madhesi National Liberation Front, Terai Cobras and Madhesh Mukti Tigers pursued this aim of autonomy using violent means. Some members of these organisations were responsible for acts of terrorism including bombings and murders. The Alliance for Independent Madhesh also demands independence of the Terai.
Indian influence in Nepal Terai
After the Nepalese Constituent Assembly election, 2008, Indian politicians kept on trying to secure strategic interests in the Nepal Terai, such as over hydropower energy, development projects, business and trade. It has been alleged that by supporting the 2015 Nepal blockade, India tried to dominate Nepal's internal politics and foment the conflict in the Nepal Terai.
The culture of Madeshi people is complex and diverse. The Muslim and indigenous peoples speak their own languages and have distinct cultural traditions that differ from the Hindu caste groups. Latter comprise at least 43 distinct groups.: 143 Caste groups include Bania, Brahman, Dhobi, Kalawar, Kewat, Kshatriya, Kumhar, Kurmi, Kushwaha and Teli.: 9
Muslim people in the Terai constitute about 96% of all Muslims in the country. Their cultural traditions are interlinked with those of Muslim people in northern India; popular destinations for their ziyarat pilgrimage are the shrines of Ajmer Sharif Dargah and Ghazi Saiyyad Salar Masud in Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh, respectively. They are influenced by the hierarchy of the Hindu caste system, with the difference that it is not based on the principle of pollution and purity, but on occupation.
Both Muslim and Hindu Madheshi parents place more emphasis on the education of boys than of girls.: 144 Despite an increase of schools and primary education being compulsory and free of cost, more boys than girls are enrolled. Girls are expected to look after younger siblings and do household chores. Many rural Madheshi girls are married at an age of 14 to 16 years.
Madheshi people speak Bengali, Maithili, Bhojpuri, Urdu and Hindi languages.: 9  The National Population and Housing Census of 2011 knows of 123 languages spoken in all of Nepal and lists:
- 3,092,530 Maithili speaking people (11.7% of Nepal's total population), of which 3,004,245 lived in the Terai;
- 1,584,958 Bhojpuri speaking people (5.98%), of which 1,542,333 lived in the Terai;
- 1,529,875 Tharu speaking people (5.77%), including 1,479,129 in the Terai;
- 793,418 Bajjika speaking people (2.99%), including 791,737 in the Terai;
- 691,546 speak Urdu (2.61%), including 671,851 in the Terai.
The following religions are practised in the Terai according to the National Population and Housing Census of 2011:
- Hinduism with 11,308,620 followers
- Islam with 1,105,533 followers
- Buddhism with 472,469 followers
- Kirat with 190,458 followers
- Christianity with 137,723 followers
- Prakriti with 63,747 followers
- Jainism with 2,169 followers
- Bon with 1,379 followers, less than 900 followers of the Baháʼí Faith and less than 500 Sikhs.
Muslim Madheshis practise the traditional nikah marriage, which is recognised by law. The largest and oldest madrasa is located in Krishnanagar. Mawlawis teaching Quran and Hadith at madrasas in the Terai are either from India, or were trained in India and Saudi Arabia. Many Muslim Madheshis practise endogamy.
In 1989, a study on food consumption patterns was conducted with 108 people in a village in Chitwan district. Results of this study showed that the people consumed seven food items on average. Rice constituted almost half of their daily food intake, supplemented by vegetables, potatoes, milk and dairy products. Less frequently they consumed meat, fish, eggs and fruit. About 13.7% of the total food intake of men was alcohol, whereas females consumed far less alcohol. Fruit commonly grown in the Terai include mango, lychee, papaya, guava, banana and jackfruit.
- International Crisis Group (2007). Nepal's Troubled Terai Region (PDF). Asia Report N°136. Kathmandu, Brussels: International Crisis Group.
- Adhikari, K. P. & Gellner, D. N. (2016). "New Identity Politics and the 2012 Collapse of Nepal's Constituent Assembly: When the dominant becomes 'other'". Modern Asian Studies. 50 (6): 2009–2040. doi:10.1017/S0026749X15000438. S2CID 146986746.
- Gellner, D. N. (2019). "Masters of hybridity: how activists reconstructed Nepali society". Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 25 (2): 265–284. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.13025.
- Savada, A. M. (1991). "Caste and Ethnicity". Nepal and Bhutan : country studies. Washington, D.C.: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. pp. 74–81.
- Whelpton, J. (1997). "Political Identity in Nepal: State, Nation and Community". In Gellner, D. N.; Pfaff-Czarnecka, J.; Whelpton, J. (eds.). Nationalism and ethnicity in a Hindu kingdom: The politics of culture in contemporary Nepal. London, New York: Routledge. pp. 39–78. ISBN 9789057020896.
- Gellner, D. N. (2007). "Caste, Ethnicity and Inequality in Nepal". Economic and Political Weekly. 42 (20): 1823–1828. JSTOR 4419601.
- Dahal, D. R. (2008). "The 'Madhesi' People: Issues and Challenges of Democracy in the Nepal Terai". In Gellner, D.; Hachhethu, K. (eds.). Local Democracy in South Asia: Microprocesses of democratization in Nepal and its neighbours. New Delhi, Los Angeles, London, Singapore: Sage Publications. pp. 128–149. ISBN 9788132100164.
- Kabir 2013, p. 10.
- Dixit, K. M. (2017). "Who is the Madhesi subaltern?". Nepali Times. Kathmandu.
- Hachhethu 2007, p. 4.
- Kabir 2013, p. 11.
- Apte, V. S. (1957–1959). "मध्य madhya". Revised and enlarged edition of Prin. V. S. Apte's The practical Sanskrit-English dictionary. Poona: Prasad Prakashan.
- Mishra, R. (2007). "Sectional President's Address: Ethnicity and National Unification: The Madheshis of Nepal". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 67: 802–833. JSTOR 44148000.
- Singh, C. P. (2011). "Origin and Development of Madheshi Movement in Nepal". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 72 (Part II): 1047–1053. JSTOR 44145716.
- Miklian 2009, p. 3.
- Dahal, D. R. (1983). "Economic development through indigenous means: A case of Indian migration in the Nepal Terai" (PDF). Contribution to Nepalese Studies. 11 (1): 1–20.
- Gaige, F. H. (1975). "Migration into the Tarai". Regionalism and National Unity in Nepal (Second ed.). Delhi: Vikas Publishing House. pp. 58–86.
- Guneratne, A. (2002). "The Tharu and the Tarai". Many tongues, one people: the making of Tharu identity in Nepal. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. pp. 20–61. ISBN 0801487285.
- Ansari, H. (1981). "Muslims in Nepal". Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. 2 (3): 138–158. doi:10.1080/02666958108715821.
- Dastider, M. (2000). "Muslims of Nepal's Terai". Economic and Political Weekly. 35 (10): 766–769. JSTOR 4408986.
- Jain, P. C. (1982). "Indians abroad: a current population estimate". Economic and Political Weekly. 17 (8): 299–304. JSTOR 4370703.
- Kabir 2012, p. 14.
- Pathak, B. & Uprety, D. (2009). Tarai-Madhes searching for identity based security (PDF). Kathmandu: Conflict Study Center.
- Shrestha, S. & Mulmi, S. (2016). Legal Analysis of Citizenship Law of Nepal. A Comparative Study of the Nepal Citizenship Act, 2006 with the Constitution, Precedents, International Human Rights Obligation and Best Practices. Publication No. 190 (PDF). Kathmandu: Forum for Women, Law & Development.
- Bhuju, U. R.; Shakya, P. R.; Basnet, T. B. & Shrestha, S. (2007). Nepal Biodiversity Resource Book. Protected Areas, Ramsar Sites, and World Heritage Sites. Kathmandu: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Ministry of Environment, Science and Technology, in cooperation with United Nations Environment Programme, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. ISBN 978-92-9115-033-5.
- Central Bureau of Statistics (2012). National Population and Housing Census 2011 (PDF). Kathmandu: Government of Nepal.
- Kabir 2012, p. 7.
- Bhattachan, K. (2013). "Ethnopolitics and ethnodevelopment". In Lawoti, M.; Hangen, S. (eds.). Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in Nepal: identities and mobilization after 1990. Oxon, New York: Routledge. pp. 35–57. ISBN 9780415780971.
- Krämer, K.-H. (2007). "How representative is the Nepali State?". In Gellner, D. (ed.). Resistance and the State: Nepalese experiences. New York: Berghahn Books. pp. 179–198. ISBN 9788187358084.
- Kabir 2013, pp. 13–14.
- Hachhethu 2007, pp. 9–10; Kabir 2013, p. 19
- Yadav, R. (2010). "On Being Madhesi". Himalaya, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies. 29 (1): 65–68.
- Jha, K. (2017). "Tarai and Madhes". The Madhesi Upsurge and the Contested Idea of Nepal. Springer Briefs in Anthropology. Singapore: Springer. pp. 38–41. ISBN 978-981-10-2926-4.
- Kabir 2012, p. 8.
- Hangen, S. (2007). Creating a "New Nepal": the ethnic dimension. Washington: East-West Center. ISBN 9781932728620.
- Nayak, N. (2011). "The Madhesi Movement in Nepal: Implications for India". Strategic Analysis. 35 (4): 640–660. doi:10.1080/09700161.2011.576099. S2CID 154365607.
- Kabir 2012, p. 12; Miklian 2009, p. 5
- Kabir 2012, p. 20.
- Pandey, K. (2017). "Politicising ethnicity: Tharu contestation of Madheshi identity in Nepal's Tarai". The South Asianist. 5 (1): 304–322.
- Hachhethu 2007, p. 5; Miklian 2009, p. 15
- "Nepal Timeline Year 2004". South Asia Terrorism Portal. 2004. Retrieved 17 April 2017.
- Press Trust of India (2016). "Nepal: Madhesis protest outside British embassy against 1816 treaty". Indian Express. Retrieved 17 April 2017.
- "Alliance for Independent Madhesh (AIM)". Alliance for Independent Madhesh. Retrieved 17 April 2017.
- Gellner, D. (2014). "The 2013 Elections in Nepal". Asian Affairs. 45 (2): 243–261. doi:10.1080/03068374.2014.909627.
- Ojha, H. (2015). "The India-Nepal Crisis". The Diplomat.
- Mahato, R. (2016). "The endless transition". Nepali Times. Kathmandu.
- Whelpton, J. (2005). "Peoples and migrations". A History of Nepal. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 8–15. ISBN 978-0-521-80470-7.
- Sijapati, M. A. (2011). "Fragmentarey parts. Competing traditions, new identity". Islamic Revival in Nepal: Religion and a New Nation. London, New York: Routledge. pp. 25–29. ISBN 9781136701344.
- Thapa, S. (1995). "Caste Hierarchy: The inter-Ethnic Stratification in the Muslim society of Nepal". Tribhuvan University Journal. XVII: 78–87.
- Gupta, A. K. (2019). "Significance of Girl Education: Parents' Perception from Rural Madhesh of Nepal". Journal of Management and Development Studies. 29: 61–68.
- Dastider, M. (2007). Understanding Nepal: Muslims in a plural society. New Delhi: Har-Anand Publications. ISBN 978-81-241-1271-7.
- Sijapati, M.A. (2011). "Muslims in Nepal: The Local and Global Dimensions of a Changing Religious Minority" (PDF). Religion Compass. 5 (11): 656–665. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8171.2011.00314.x.
- Khalid, S. (2016). "Nepal's ethnic Madhesis fight for dignity and equality". Aljazeera.
- Thapa, S. (2000). "Ethnic Variation of Nepal's Muslim Minority" (PDF). ISIM Newsletter. 6: 18.
- Sijapati, M. A. (2012). "Mawdudi's Islamic Revivalist Ideology and the Islami Sangh Nepal". Studies in Nepali History and Society. 17 (1): 41–61.
- Ohno, Y.; Hirai, K.; Sato, N.; Ito, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Tamura, T. & Shrestha, M. P. (1997). "Food consumption patterns and nutrient intake among Nepalese living in the southern rural Terai region". Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition (6): 251–255.
- Sharma, K. C. (2001). "Crop diversification in Nepal" (PDF). In Papademetriou, M. K.; Dent, F. J. (eds.). Crop Diversification in the Asia-Pacific Region. RAP publication 81. Bangkok: FAO. pp. 81–94.
- Miklian, J. (2009). Nepal's Terai: Constructing an Ethnic Conflict. South Asia Briefing Paper #1 (PDF). Oslo: International Peace Research Institute. ISBN 978-82-7288-309-5.CS1 maint: ignored ISBN errors (link)
- Hachhethu, K. (2007). "Madheshi nationalism and restructuring the Nepali state". International Seminar on Constitutionalism and Diversity in Nepal. Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu: Centre for Nepal and Asian Studies. pp. 1–12. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.694.9316.
- Kabir, H. (2013). Education, Nationalism, and Conflict in Plural Society in Nepal: Terai Region in the Post-Maoist Context. Discussion Paper Series. Volume 19. Hiroshima: Hiroshima University Partnership Project for Peace Building and Capacity Development.
|volume=has extra text (help)
- Kabir, H. (2012). The rise of new regional political force in Madhes and its consequence in post-conflict Nepal. Discussion Paper Series. Volume 15. Hiroshima: Hiroshima University Partnership Project for Peace Building and Capacity Development.
|volume=has extra text (help)
- "Madhesh: Positive progress for Madesh in Nepal". Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization. 2019.
- "UN: Nepal blockade puts millions of children at risk". BBC News. 2015. Retrieved 25 December 2015.