|Part of a series on|
|Conventional magnetic circuits|
|Phasor magnetic circuits|
|Gyrator-capacitor model variables|
The gyrator–capacitor model is a lumped-element model for magnetic fields, similar to magnetic circuits, but based on using elements analogous to capacitors (see magnetic capacitance) rather than elements analogous to resistors (see magnetic reluctance) to represent the magnetic flux path. Windings are represented as gyrators, interfacing between the electrical circuit and the magnetic model.
The primary advantage of the gyrator–capacitor model compared to the magnetic reluctance model is that the model preserves the correct values of energy flow, storage and dissipation. The gyrator–capacitor model is an example of a group of analogies that preserve energy flow across energy domains by making power conjugate pairs of variables in the various domains analogous.
Magnetic effective resistance
Magnetic effective resistance (SI unit: Ω−1) is the real component of complex magnetic impedance. This causes a magnetic circuit to lose magnetic potential energy. Active power in a magnetic circuit equals the product of magnetic effective resistance and magnetic current squared .
The magnetic effective resistance on a complex plane appears as the side of the resistance triangle for magnetic circuit of an alternating current. The effective magnetic resistance is bounding with the effective magnetic conductance by the expression
where is the full magnetic impedance of a magnetic circuit.
In a magnetic circuit, magnetic inductance (inductive magnetic reactance) is the analogy to inductance in an electrical circuit. In the SI system, it is measured in units of -Ω−1. This model makes magnetomotive force (mmf) the analog of electromotive force in electrical circuits, and time rate of change of magnetic flux the analog of electric current.
For phasor analysis the magnetic inductive reactance is:
In the complex form it is a positive imaginary number:
The magnetic potential energy sustained by magnetic inductivity varies with the frequency of oscillations in electric fields. The average power in a given period is equal to zero. Due to its dependence on frequency, magnetic inductance is mainly observable in magnetic circuits which operate at VHF and/or UHF frequencies.
Magnetic impedance (SI unit: Ω−1) is the ratio of a sinusoidal magnetic tension to a sinusoidal magnetic current in a gyrator–capacitor model. Analogous to electrical impedance, magnetic impedance is likewise a complex variable.
Magnetic impedance is also called the full magnetic resistance. It is derived from:
The phase angle of the magnetic impedance is equal to:
Magnetic reactance is the parameter of a passive magnetic circuit or an element of the circuit, which is equal to the square root of the difference of squares of the magnetic complex impedance and magnetic effective resistance to a magnetic current, taken with the sign plus, if the magnetic current lags behind the magnetic tension in phase, and with the sign minus, if the magnetic current leads the magnetic tension in phase.
Magnetic reactance  is the component of magnetic complex impedance of the alternating current circuit, which produces the phase shift between a magnetic current and magnetic tension in the circuit. It is measured in units of and is denoted by (or ). It may be inductive or capacitive , where is the angular frequency of a magnetic current, is the magnetic inductivity of a circuit, is the magnetic capacitivity of a circuit. The magnetic reactance of an undeveloped circuit with the inductivity and the capacitivity, which are connected in series, is equal: . If , then the net reactance and resonance takes place in the circuit. In the general case . When an energy loss is absent (), . The angle of the phase shift in a magnetic circuit . On a complex plane, the magnetic reactance appears as the side of the resistance triangle for circuit of an alternating current.
Where: is the magnetic permeability, is the element cross-section, and is the element length.
Magnetic capacitivity is also equal to magnetic flux divided by the difference of magnetic potential across the element.
- is the difference of the magnetic potentials.
The notion of magnetic capacitivity is employed in the gyrator–capacitor model in a way analogous to capacitance in electrical circuits.
Magnetic complex impedance
Magnetic complex impedance is equal to the relationship of the complex effective or amplitude value of a sinusoidal magnetic tension on the passive magnetic circuit or its element, and accordingly the complex effective or amplitude value of a sinusoidal magnetic current in this circuit or in this element.
Magnetic complex impedance [1, 2] is measured in units –  and determined by the formula:
where is the relationship of the effective or amplitude value of a magnetic tension and accordingly of the effective or amplitude magnetic current is called full magnetic resistance (magnetic impedance). The full magnetic resistance (magnetic impedance) is equal to the modulus of the complex magnetic impedance. The argument of a complex magnetic impedance is equal to the difference of the phases of the magnetic tension and magnetic current . Complex magnetic impedance can be presented in following form:
where is the real part of the complex magnetic impedance, called the effective magnetic resistance; is the imaginary part of the complex magnetic impedance, called the reactive magnetic resistance. The full magnetic resistance (magnetic impedance) is equal
- D.C. Hamill (1993). "Lumped equivalent circuits of magnetic components: the gyrator-capacitor approach". IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 8 (2): 97–103. doi:10.1109/63.223957.
- Pohl, R. W. (1960). Elektrizitätslehre (in German). Berlin-Gottingen-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
- Küpfmüller K. Einführung in die theoretische Elektrotechnik, Springer-Verlag, 1959.
- Popov, V. P. (1985). The Principles of Theory of Circuits (in Russian). M.: Higher School.
- Arkadiew W. Eine Theorie des elektromagnetischen Feldes in den ferromagnetischen Metallen. – Phys. Zs., H. 14, No 19, 1913, S. 928-934.