# Magnetomotive force

In physics, the magnetomotive force (mmf) is a quantity appearing in the equation for the magnetic flux in a magnetic circuit, often called Ohm's law for magnetic circuits.[1] It is the property of certain substances or phenomena that give rise to magnetic fields:

${\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}=\Phi {\mathcal {R}},}$

where Φ is the magnetic flux and R is the reluctance of the circuit. It can be seen that the magnetomotive force plays a role in this equation analogous to the voltage V in Ohm's law: V = IR, since it is the cause of magnetic flux in a magnetic circuit:[2]

1. = NI
where N is the number of turns in the coil and I is the electric current through the circuit.
2. = ΦR
where Φ is the magnetic flux and R is the magnetic reluctance
3. = HL
where H is the magnetizing force (the strength of the magnetizing field) and L is the mean length of a solenoid or the circumference of a toroid

## Units

The SI unit of mmf is the ampere, the same as the unit of current (analogously the units of emf and voltage are both the volt). Informally, and frequently, this unit is stated as the ampere-turn to avoid confusion with current. This was the unit name in the MKS system. Occasionally, the cgs system unit of the gilbert may also be encountered.

## History

The term magnetomotive force was coined by Henry Augustus Rowland in 1880. Rowland intended this to indicate a direct analogy with electromotive force.[3] The idea of a magnetic analogy to electromotive force can be found much earlier in the work of Michael Faraday (1791-1867) and it is hinted at by James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879). However, Rowland coined the term and was the first to make explicit an Ohm's law for magnetic circuits in 1873.[4]

Ohm's law for magnetic circuits is sometimes referred to as Hopkinson's law rather than Rowland's law as some authors attribute the law to John Hopkinson instead of Rowland.[5] According to a review of magnetic circuit analysis methods this is an incorrect attribution originating from an 1885 paper by Hopkinson.[6] Furthermore, Hopkinson actually cites Rowland's 1873 paper in this work.[7]

## References

1. ^ Waygood, p. 137
2. ^ Smith, pp. 495-506
3. ^ Hon & Goldstein, pp. 638-639
• Rowland (1880), pp. 92, 97
4. ^ Thompson, p. viii
• Rowland (1873), p. 143
5. ^ See for instance
• Schmidt & Schitter, p. 340, or
• Waygood, p. 137
6. ^ Lambert et al., p. 2427
7. ^ Hopkinson, p. 455