Maillé affair

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Éoliennes de l'Érable, a wind turbine company, made a request in court to obtain Dr Maillé's data.

The Maillé affair concerns a court ordinance obtained by a private company to force scientist Marie-Ève Maillé to give access to data exposing the identity of her research participants. The researcher documented the conflicts that arose in a municipality of Québec in the context of a windfarm project. Dr. Maillé, adjunct professor at Université du Québec à Montréal, refused to comply to the ordinance because it contravened the ethical duty of preserving the privacy of research data. The ordinance was retracted in May 2017.

Sequence of events[edit]

After a call for bids by Hydro-Québec in 2005, a wind farm project was presented by the Enerfín company for the regional county municipality (RCM) of l'Érable. Eventually, the company received the contract for the project. Enerfín is a subsidiary of Elecnor, a Spanish S.A. company.[1] In 2008, Enerfín created the subsidiary Éoliennes de l'Érable to develop the project.[2]

The wind farm project divided the citizens of l'Érable.[3] In the report presented to the Bureau d'audiences publiques sur l'environnement, a deterioration of social climate was noted, based on several essays submitted by citizens.[4] Despite the tensions, the project was authorized and the wind farm construction started in 2011. It has been in activity since 2013.

In 2010, Marie-Ève Maillé interviewed residents of the RCM of l'Érable in the context of her research. Back then, she was a PhD candidate in communication at UQÀM. Her thesis was about information diffusion surrounding the wind farm project and the social division that resulted from the controversial project.[5] In this context, she interviewed 93 residents, of which 74 were opposed to the project and 14 were supporters. As a researcher, she was committed to protect the privacy of their personal data. This commitment is part of a consent form signed by her and each participant. She obtained her PhD in 2012.

In November 2012, some residents filed a request for a class-action lawsuit against Éoliennes de l'Érable, complaining about inconvenience caused by the construction and operation of the wind farm.[6] The request was accepted in 2014 by the Quebec Superior Court.[7] In 2015, the residents involved in the class action asked Dr Maillé to act as an expert witness in the lawsuit. She accepted.

The lawyers of Éoliennes de l'Érable then made a request to obtain the records of the interviews conducted by Maillé for her PhD, as well as the names of the people interviewed, in order to prepare the company's defense. In January 2016, Judge Marc St-Pierre accepted the request and ordered Maillé to transmit the data and private information about her research participants to the company's lawyers.[8] However, as is it generally the case in academic research, the participants' privacy was a condition to their participation in the research project. In order to avoid being forced to divulge her data, she withdrew her participation as an expert witness in the lawsuit. Despite her withdrawal, in March 2016, Dr Maillé received a formal notice from the court ordering her to submit her data within five days. She asked Judge St-Pierre to review his judgement. If maintained, the researcher would either have to break the confidentiality agreement she made with her research participants, or expose herself to a lawsuit for contempt of court.

On May 17, 2017, Marie-Ève Maillé appeared at Victoriaville courthouse. Assisted by lawyers from UQÀM, the Fonds de recherche du Québec and the Canadian Association of University Teachers, she asked Judge St-Pierre to review his judgement. The confidentiality engagement between the researcher and the research participants was put forward, as well as the Wigmore criteria. The new ruling was released on May 31, in favour of the researcher. Judge St-Pierre retracted his preceding judgement, which forced Dr Maillé to disclose her raw research data.[9]

Reactions in the scientific community[edit]

Realizing the importance of the stakes in this situation, several scientists publicly gave their support to Dr Maillé. In August 2016, Québec's chief scientist Rémi Quirion said Maillé's research would never have been funded without the guarantee that the participants would remain anonymous.[10] The same day, the director of the Panel on Responsible Conduct of Research, Susan V. Zimmerman emphasized that it is the researcher's duty to guarantee confidentiality on the information they obtain. On November 3, the Canadian Association of University Teachers says it was concerned by the ordinance forcing Dr Maillé to reveal the identity of the participants to her research.[11] The day after, a letter co-signed by over 200 researchers from institutions in Québec was published. For the authors, the confidentiality of participants' data is an "inescapable aspect of academic research involving humans".[12] They wrote that "the future of scientific inquiry and citizen confidence in academic research rely on this issue". Some days later, vice-rector for research, discovery, creation and innovation of Université de Montréal reiterated the importance of respecting research participants' private lives, which is a "key element of ethics of research involving human participants".[13] At Université du Québec à Rimouski, researchers emphasized that failing to protect information obtained in a research context may "deter citizen response to researchers requests and questions as well as restricting access to first hand data essential to a fine understanding of social realities".[14]

On November 28, 2016, UQÀM filed a voluntary intervention to the court, collectively with the Fonds québécois de la recherche sur la nature et les technologies, the Fonds de recherche du Québec en santé and the Fonds de recherche du Québec Société et culture.[15] By doing so, they showed their support for Dr Maillé in her request to have the ordinance annulled.

The still-ongoing story has also been taken up by the Canadian Civil Liberties Association[16] and by Science.[17]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Some history". Enerfín. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
  2. ^ "Historique du projet". Éoliennes de l'Érable. Archived from the original on December 20, 2016. Retrieved December 13, 2016.
  3. ^ Municipalité Régionale de Comté de L’Érable (2009). Mémoire sur le projet d'aménagement du parc éolien de l'Érable (PDF) (Report). p. 57. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 19, 2018. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
  4. ^ Bureau d'audiences publiques sur l'environnement (2010). Rapport d'enquête et d'audience publique sur le projet d'aménagement d'un parc éolien dans la MRC de l'Érable (PDF) (Report). Government of Québec. p. 147. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 6, 2018. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
  5. ^ Maillé, Marie-Ève (2012). Information, confiance et cohésion sociale dans un conflit environnemental lié à un projet de parc éolien au Québec (PDF) (PhD). Université du Québec à Montréal.
  6. ^ Jean Rivard & Yvon Bourque v. Éoliennes de l'Érable, s.e.c. (Cour Supérieure du Québec 29 October 2012), Text.
  7. ^ Proulx, Geneviève (10 November 2014). "L'entreprise Éoliennes de l'Érable visée par un recours collectif". Radio-Canada. Radio-Canada. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
  8. ^ Jean Rivard & Yvon Bourque v. Éoliennes de l'Érable, s.e.c. (Cour Supérieure du Québec 13 January 2016), Text.
  9. ^ Jean Rivard et Yvon Bourque c. Éoliennes de l'Érable S.E.C. (defenderess), Marie-Ève Maillé (applicant), Fonds de recherche du Québec Nature et technologie, Fonds de recherche du Québec Santé, Fonds de recherche du Québec Société et culture, Université du Québec à Montréal et Association canadienne des professeures et professeurs d'université (intervenants) (Cour Supérieure du Québec 31 May 2017), Text.
  10. ^ Bergeron, Ulysse (31 October 2016). "Une chercheuse forcée par la justice de révéler l'identité de ses sources". Radio-Canada. Radio-Canada. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
  11. ^ "CAUT urges defence of research confidentiality at UQAM". Canadian Association of University Teachers. Canadian Association of University Teachers. 2 November 2016. Archived from the original on 1 January 2017. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
  12. ^ Pouliot, Chantal; et al. (3 November 2016). "L'affaire Maillé, ou l'avenir de la confidentialité dans la recherche scientifique". Le Devoir (in French). Retrieved December 18, 2016.
  13. ^ Sauvé, Mathieu-Robert (8 November 2016). "Ne touchez pas à la confidentialité en recherche!". Université de Montréal. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
  14. ^ "Des fondements de la pratique scientifique mis en cause". Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire sur le développement régional, de l'Est du Québec. Facebook. 17 November 2016. Retrieved December 17, 2016.
  15. ^ Jean Rivard & Yvon Bourque (Cour Supérieure du Québec 18 November 2016), Text.
  16. ^ Drouin, Elena (4 November 2016). "Issue of Protection of Academic Sources Raised in Recent Quebec Court Order". Canadian Civil Liberties Association. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
  17. ^ Kondro, Wayne (22 November 2016). "Canadian researcher in legal battle to keep her interviews confidential". Science. AAAS. Retrieved December 18, 2016.

See also[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maillé_affair&oldid=1215028933"