Malinvestment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In Austrian business cycle theory, malinvestments are badly allocated business investments due to artificially low cost of credit and an unsustainable increase in money supply. Central banks are often blamed for causing malinvestments, such as the dot-com bubble and the United States housing bubble. Austrian economists such as the Swedish central bank's Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences laureate F. A. Hayek advocate the idea that malinvestment occurs due to the combination of fractional reserve banking and artificially low interest rates misleading relative price signals which eventually necessitate a corrective contraction – a boom followed by a bust.[1]

In the Austrian Business Cycle Theory and all its different frameworks, the actual definition of malinvestment is the same: an investment with high potential that becomes worthless.[2] However, it is important to note that a malinvestment only occurs if the investment becomes worthless due to increased interest rates.[3] The classification of a malinvestment is only when there is an increased amount of credit which causes it to become worthless. Many economists believe that malinvestments occur at different times and to certain companies. Åkerman and Dahmén who came up with the Åkerman-Dahmén theory, which is different than the Austrian Business Cycle Theory, believe that a malinvestment will occur during the "boom" to companies who cannot keep up with the interest rate growth.[4]

The concept dates back to at least 1867.[5] In 1940, Ludwig von Mises wrote, "The popularity of inflation and credit expansion, the ultimate source of the repeated attempts to render people prosperous by credit expansion, and thus the cause of the cyclical fluctuations of business, manifests itself clearly in the customary terminology. The boom is called good business, prosperity, and upswing. Its unavoidable aftermath, the readjustment of conditions to the real data of the market, is called crisis, slump, bad business, depression. People rebel against the insight that the disturbing element is to be seen in the malinvestment and the overconsumption of the boom period and that such an artificially induced boom is doomed. They are looking for the philosophers' stone to make it last."[6]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Larry J. Sechrest. "Explaining Malinvestment and Overinvestment" (pdf), October 2005, referenced 2010-07-01.
  2. ^ Holcombe, Randall G. (2016-04-11). "Malinvestment". The Review of Austrian Economics. 30 (2): 153–167. doi:10.1007/s11138-016-0343-2. ISSN 0889-3047.
  3. ^ Sechrest, Larry J. (2006). "Explaining Malinvestment and Overinvestment". Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. 9 No. 4: 27–38 – via EBSCOhost.
  4. ^ Erixon, Lennart (2010-06-07). "Development blocks, malinvestment and structural tensions – the Åkerman–Dahmén theory of the business cycle". Journal of Institutional Economics. 7 (1): 105–129. doi:10.1017/s1744137410000196 ISSN 1744-1374.
  5. ^ John Mills, Article read before the Manchester Statistical Society, December 11, 1867, on Credit Cycles and the Origin of Commercial Panics; As quoted in Financial crises and periods of industrial and commercial depression, Burton, T. E. (1931, first published 1902); see online version. New York and London: D. Appleton & Co; "Panics do not destroy capital; they merely reveal the extent to which it has been destroyed by its betrayal into hopelessly unproductive works."
  6. ^ Ludwig von Mises, Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, 1966 [1]