Manoj-Babli honour killing case
The Manoj-Babli honour killing case was the honour killing of Indian newlyweds Manoj Banwala and Babli in June 2007 and the successive court case which historically convicted defendants for an honour killing. The killing was ordered by a khap panchayat (khap), a religious caste-based council among Jatts, in their Karora village in Kaithal district, Haryana.
The khap passed a decree prohibiting marriage against societal norms. Such caste-based councils are common in the inner regions of several Indian states, including Haryana, Punjab, western Uttar Pradesh, and parts of Rajasthan, and have been operating with government approval for years. In any event, the state government expressed no concern about the ruling of the khap panchayat.
The Khap panchayat's ruling was based on the assumption that Manoj and Babli belonged to the Banwala gotra, a Jat community, and were therefore considered to be siblings despite not being directly related and any union between them would be invalid and incestuous. Nevertheless the couple went ahead with their marriage, following which they were abducted and killed by Babli's relatives.
In March 2010 a Karnal district court sentenced the five perpetrators to be executed, the first time an Indian court had done so in an honour killing case. The khap head who ordered but did not take part in the killings received a life sentence, and the driver involved in the abduction a seven-year prison term. According to Home Minister P. Chidambaram, the UPA-led central government was to propose an amendment to the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in response to the deaths of Manoj and Babli, making honour killings a "distinct offense".
- 1 Background
- 2 Development of the relationship and subsequent marriage
- 3 Court appearance
- 4 Kidnapping and murder
- 5 Court judgement
- 6 Aftermath
- 7 Appeal
- 8 In popular culture
- 9 Bibliography
- 10 References
- 11 External links
Manoj's and Babli's families lived in Karoran Village, Kaithal. Manoj's mother, Chanderpati Berwal, had four children, of which Manoj was the eldest. Chanderpati was widowed at the age of 37, when Manoj was only 9. Manoj owned an electronics repair shop at Kaithal and was the only member of his family receiving income. Manoj's cousin, Narender, lived with the family and worked in Panchkula.
Babli's mother, Ompati, also had four children, including eldest son, Suresh, and Babli. Like Manoj, Suresh was the only earning member of the family. Babli was still studying in school. Ompati is a widow.[note 1]
Development of the relationship and subsequent marriage
In 2005, Manoj and Babli began to show interest in each other. Manoj was two years older than Babli. All residents of their Karora village belong to the same caste of Banwala, a Jat community, and marrying within the caste is considered a sacrilege. Chanderpati recalled, "We knew about Babli long before they decided to marry each other. She would call up often and I would sermonize to her about staying away from Manoj, fearing the fallout of such an alliance. They were, however, unconcerned and chatted for hours together. If I did walk into the room while they were talking, Manoj would quickly disconnect the phone and run off to avoid any questioning." She continued, "I even went to Babli's house and told her mother that Manoj and Babli were seeing each other. I asked her to dissuade Babli or quickly marry them before the word spread."
Two years later, on 5 April 2007, Chanderpati last saw Manoj. "He ate his food and left to sleep at the shop since he had a class XII compartment exam in English to take the next day. Unlike other days, next morning, he did not show up." The following day Babli's uncle arrived to speak with Manoj. According to Chanderpati, "He said he had come to recover some money that Manoj had borrowed, had tea and left when I told him that Manoj was away for an exam. We only discovered late in the evening that Babli, too, was missing and the two had run away." Manoj had eloped with Babli to Chandigarh and married her on 7 April at a Durga temple, their commitment to one another transcending their willingness to abide by the societal norms.
Furious with the marriage, Babli's family asked for intervention from the local khap panchayat, which annulled the marriage. The khap also announced a social boycott on Manoj's family. Anyone who kept ties with them would be fined ₨25,000. Ompati tried to persuade her family that Babli did nothing dishonorable and that she and Manoj would move back home soon.
On 26 April, Babli's family filed a First Information Report (FIR) against Manoj and his family for kidnapping Babli. On 15 June, Manoj went to court with Babli, testifying that they had married in conformity with the law and that he did not kidnap Babli. The judge ordered police protection for the two. Chandrapati did not attend the trial so that Babli's family would not be aware that Manoj and Babli were in town.
After the trial, Manoj and Babli, accompanied by a team of five police officers assigned to them for protection, left for Chandigarh. The police left them at Pipli and slipped away. Suspecting foul play, Manoj and Babli did not continue toward Chandigarh, instead boarding a bus for Karnal. According to a statement filed by Chanderpati, later that day, around 3:40 pm, she received a call from a Pipli telephone booth from Manoj, who said that the police had deserted them, and Babli's family members were trailing them, so they would try to take a bus to Delhi and call her back later. Babli asked for acceptance from Chanderpati, who replied affirmatively. That was the last time Manoj's family heard from the couple.
On 20 June, Chanderpati's complaint regarding the kidnapping was filed as an FIR at the Bhutana police station following media pressure on the police.
Kidnapping and murder
The couple's bus left for Delhi, but en route at 4:30 pm, Babli's relatives stopped the bus near Raipur Jatan village, about 20 kilometres (12 mi) from Pipli. They kidnapped the couple in a Scorpio SUV driven by Mandeep Singh. Kuldip Thekedar, a road contractor, witnessed the kidnapping and filed a complaint at the Butana police station in Karnal district, giving the licence plate number of the Scorpio. Later, Chanderpati ascribed the murder to the unauthorised withdrawal of the couple's security team ignoring the orders given by the district and sessions judge (DSJ) of Kaithal. Upon receiving no further news, Chanderpati's nephew, Narendra Singh traced the contractor, and after he was shown a photo of the couple, the contractor recognised the couple. The family then understood that Manoj and Babli were the victims of the kidnapping.
After the kidnapping, the couple were beaten. Babli's brother Suresh forced her to consume pesticide, while four other family members pushed Manoj to the ground, her uncle Rajinder pulling a noose around Manoj's neck and strangling him in front of Babli. They wrapped the bodies in gunny sacks and dumped them in Barwala Link Canal in Hisar district. On 23 June, nine days later, their mutilated bodies, hands and feet tied, were fished out of the canal by Kheri Chowki police. After autopsy, police preserved Manoj's shirt and Babli's anklet and cremated the bodies as unclaimed on 24 June. On 1 July the family identified them by the remnants of their clothing. The accused were subsequently arrested.
Police discovered a number of articles in the Scorpio used to kidnap the couple—parts of Babli's anklet, two buttons from Manoj's shirt, and torn photographs of the couple. Manoj's purse was found on one of the accused.
No Karnal lawyer would adopt the case, so Manoj's family had to find lawyers from Hisar. Later on Adv. Sunil Rana from karnal accepted the case, arguing on their behalf public prosecutor Sunil Rana and lawyers Lal Bahadur, Surat Singh, Cornel Omparkash, and Rakesh Manjhu from Hisar, Haryana. Bahadur argued that the couples' clothes recovered from the canal and photographs from the Scorpio established that day's happenings. Bahadur also cited the contractor's statement and the last phone call from Manoj, in which Manoj had related that Babli's relatives were trailing them. However, the contractor "turned hostile" and withdrew his statement.
Arguing for the defence was lawyer Jagmal Singh. He asserted that there was no evidence against the accused and that it was all contrived by the media, no evidence that the khap panchayat ever met to discuss the fate of the couple, and no evidence indicating that Manoj and Babli were dead. The cremated bodies recovered from the canal were never confirmed to be those of Manoj and Babli.
On 29 March 2010, after 33 months of 50 hearings[note 2] with 41 witnesses, the karnal District court found the accused guilty of murder, kidnapping, conspiracy, and destroying evidence under respective sections in the IPC.[note 3] The next day, 30 March, for the first time in Haryana state history, a death penalty verdict was announced in the double murder case for the five accused. All were related to Babli, and included her brother Suresh, cousins Gurdev and Satish, paternal uncle Rajender, and maternal uncle Baru Ram. The leader of the khap panchayat Ganga Raj (52), was given a life sentence for conspiracy, while the driver, Mandeep Singh, held guilty of kidnapping, was given a jail term of seven years. The court asked the Haryana government to provide a compensation of ₨100,000 to Chanderpati, who had filed the case. Ganga Raj was fined ₨16,000, and the other six convicts ₨6,000 each.
The court also accused six police personnel of dereliction of duty and directed the SSP of Kaithal to take action against them. The personnel included head constable Jayender Singh, sub-inspector Jagbir Singh, and the members of the escort party provided to the couple. They claimed that the couple wanted them to leave. The SSP's statement was that "[i]t is correct that the deceased couple had given in writing not to take police security any further, but Jagbir Singh was well aware that there was a threat to their lives from the relatives of the girl." The report stated that Jayender informed Gurdev Singh of the location of the police and that of Manoj and Babli over his mobile phone. Jayender was dismissed from the police force, and both he and Jagbir were penalised by a cut of two increments.
In her verdict, district judge Vani Gopal Sharma stated, "This court has gone through sleepless nights and tried to put itself in the shoes of the offenders and think as to what might have prompted them to take such a step." "Khap panchayats have functioned contrary to the constitution, ridiculed it and have become a law unto themselves."
Bahadur was satisfied with the decision, "Out of seven accused, five have been given death sentences. This will send a strong message to the public that law is greater than the khap." However, he was disappointed that "the leader [Ganga Raj] got away with death penalty because he intentionally disappeared during the killing." Narendra said, "We will appeal in High Court for death penalty to the main accused, Ganga Raj. We respect the court's decision but he should be punished so that the instigators of the crime get the punishment. Also it is important that it is a very clear message so that no khap gives such directions, ever." Seema seconded Narendra's concerns, "We would have been happier if the main accused was also given the death sentence. The decision of the panchayat was not justified and people should not to be allowed to misuse their power. We have fought this battle alone when no one was supporting us." She requested more security for her family, "They tried to bribe us to withdraw the case then they threatened that they would kill us if we didn't withdraw the FIR. Even after the decision we're afraid of a backlash from the Khap Panchayat."
The case was the first resulting in the conviction of khap panchayats and the first capital punishment verdict in an honour killing case in India. The Indian media and legal experts hailed it as a "landmark judgement", a victory over these infamous assemblies, which acted for years with impunity as parallel judicial bodies. Also, few honour killing cases went to court, and this was the first case in which the groom's family in an honour killing filed the case. In a statement to the press, Home Minister Chidambaram slammed the khap panchayats, asking tersely, "Who are these khap panchayats? Who gave them the right to kill in the name of honour?"
Surat Singh, director of the Haryana Institute of Rural Development in Nilokheri, anticipated that the verdict will end the diktats of khap panchayats. The khaps had never worried before because their "political bosses refrained from acting against them. With this verdict, those who try to impose a medieval order on society will think twice". Political analyst Ranbir Singh agreed that the judgement will "act as a deterrent". Additional Advocate General Arun Walia hailed the decision: "before passing ruthless judgments, the members will surely take note of this decision".
The honour killing inspired Ajay Sinha to produce a film titled Khap—A Story of Honour Killing starring Om Puri, Yuvika Chaudhary, Govind Namdeo, Anuradha Patel, and Mohnish Behl, to raise awareness about the khap 's diktats. It will cost ₨25–30 million and was expected to enter theatres by late July 2010. Sinha claimed that the film is based on not one distinct killing but many. He considered the film "a protest against such traditions and practice". For research, Sinha had visited Haryana and spoken to khap members.
Days after the verdict, a The Times of India headline hailed Chanderpati, who struggled years for justice, as "Mother Courage" for having done "what even top politicians and bureaucrats have shied away from doing—taken on the dreaded khap panchayats." Chanderpati now lives with her two daughters and remaining son under the protection of two policemen. She withdrew her daughter Rekha from public school and sent Vinod to a school in another district. Chanderpati also reported threats from villagers, "The villagers have threatened to eliminate us. I am enemy number one and my son is a culprit. We've been told our ordeal can end if we withdraw the police case but we refused. So, the nightmare continues."
Chanderpati has stated she intends to continue until Ganga Raj is sentenced to death: "Our fight has not ended here. We will not rest till he [Ganga Raj] also gets the death penalty." The khap panchayats remain defiant even after the verdict. "The verdict has done justice to my son's death, but it has not changed the way the village works," Chanderpati said. "I am fighting but my son died only because the girl's male relatives could kill their own sister. Families allow themselves to be instigated. As long as men can kill their own daughters, what change will there be?"
Vani Gopal Sharma
Judge Vani Gopal Sharma has supposedly been receiving threats since her verdict in the case. The High Court had directed adequate security to be provided to her, but later she again informed the High Court of the failure to increase security. She sought transfer to Panchkula, a city near Chandigarh. She requested this shortly after her verdict was denounced vehemently by the khap panchayats. The police chief of Karnal district, Rakesh Kumar Arya, claimed that Sharma did not complain about inadequate security. "There is no truth in reports that Karnal's Additional District Sessions Judge wants to move out of the district on account of inadequate security," he said. "I don't know whether any such request was made, but it looks unlikely."
A maha khap panchayat (grand caste council) representing 20[note 4] khap panchayats of Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan held a meeting on 13 April 2010, in Kurukshetra to challenge the court verdict and support those sentenced to death in the case. They planned to raise money for the families of the convicts to hire top lawyers for the appeal. Each family in Haryana that was part of a khap panchayat was to contribute ₨10. They also demanded that the Hindu Marriage Act be amended to ban same-gotra marriages.
Developments in honour killing law
After the court judgement, state authorities began to take on the khap panchayats, and consequently, many village sarpanches (village heads) supporting these councils were suspended. Top Jat leader and former minister Shamsher Singh Surjewala said, "The diktats and fatwas issued by so-called gotra khaps on breaking of marriages and other similar issues would lead to Talibanization of society as such decisions were illegal and against the constitution."
On 5 August 2010, in a Parliament session, Chidambaram proposed a bill that included "public stripping of women and externment of young couples from villages and any 'act which is humiliating will be punished with severity'" in the definition of honour killing and that would "make khap-dictated honour killings a distinct offence so that all those who participate in the decision are liable to attract the death sentence". He insinuated that the proposed law would place the "onus of proof on the accused". A July 2010 The Times of India article anticipated that the bill would not pass in the monsoon session of Parliament in the same year.
The accused appealed to the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Ganga Raj's appeal for parole was declined. On 13 May 2010, the court admitted the appeal of him and the other six convicts challenging the court's verdict. On 11 March, the Punjab and Haryana High Court commuted the death sentence awarded to four convicts – Babli's brother Suresh, uncles Rajender and Baru Ram and Gurdev in the Manoj-Babli honour killing case to life imprisonment. Ganga Raj, said to be the prime conspirator, and another convict Satish were acquitted. In an interview to Newsclick, Manoj's relatives – Seema and Chanderpati affirmed that they would challenge Ganga Raj's and Satish's acquittal in the Supreme Court.
In popular culture
The June 3, 2012, episode, Intolerance to Love of TV series, Satyamev Jayate, hosted by actor Aamir Khan, featured an interview with Manoj’s sister and mother Seema and Chandrapati Banwala. The episode discussed this incident along with other cases in the episode.
- Chander Suta Dogra (2013). Manoj and Babli: A Hate Story. Penguin Books Limited. ISBN 978-81-8475-702-6.
- Conflicting reports exist as to when Ompati's husband died. According to the judge of the case, Vani Gopal Sharma, her husband died two years before the murder. According to a quote from Ompati, her husband died of trauma after the murder. The Tribune reported that Ompati's husband had died when her "children were very young".
- Reports differed as to the number of hearings. Some said 50, while others said 76.
- Sections 302, 364, 120B, and 21.
- There were different reports of the number of khap panchayats comprising the maha khap panchayat. Some sources reported 20, while others recorded 36, and one even said 200.
- "All for 'honour'". Frontline 24 (14). 14–27 July 2007. Retrieved 8 April 2010.
- Sengupta, Nandita (4 April 2010). "'Marriage, murder, judgment, it was all wrong'". The Times of India (The Times Group). Retrieved 8 April 2010.
- Hodge, Amanda (3 April 2010). "India at odds as caste culture turns to killing". The Australian. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- Sharma, Vibha (28 March 2010). "Who gave khaps the right to kill: PC". Tribune Company (The Tribune). Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- Singh, Gajinder (31 March 2010). "Death for honour killings". Calcutta, India: The Telegraph. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- "Should honour killing be dealt as murder?". The Times of India. 10 July 2010. Retrieved 8 September 2010.
- Joshi, Vishal (27 March 2010). "Haryana village boycotts honour killing victim's family, again". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
- "Haryana court convicts 7 for honour killing". The Free Library (Mail Today). 26 March 2010. Retrieved 9 April 2010.
- "6 convicted in Haryana honour killing case". IANS (The Times of India). 25 March 2010. Retrieved 28 April 2010.[dead link]
- Chhabra, Arvind (1 April 2010). "Honourable justice". Indian Times. Retrieved 29 April 2010.
- Siwach, Sukhbir; Manoj Dhaka (1 April 2010). "Judge calls for new law to deal with honour killings". The Times Group (The Times of India). Retrieved 27 May 2010.
- Lohumi, Bhanu P. (25 March 2010). "6 of girl's kin held guilty". Tribune Company (Karnal: The Tribune). Retrieved 3 May 2010.
- "Victim's kin unhappy with sentence". The Pioneer (CMYK Printech Ltd.). 31 March 2010. Retrieved 29 April 2010.[dead link]
- Gayatri, Geetanjali (28 March 2010). "Now, slain boy's mother faces life threat". Tribune Company. The Tribune. Retrieved 7 September 2010.
- "Karnal honour killing: Death sentence for 5, life for 1". NDTV Convergence Limited. 30 March 2010. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- Gahlot, Mandakini (29 March 2010). "Six to be sentenced today for 'honour killing'". The Indian Express. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- Gayatri, Geetanjali (30 March 2010). "A love story with a full stop". Tribune Company (Kaithal: The Tribune). Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- Gupta, Yoginder; Satish Seth (2 July 2007). "Honour killing rocks state, again". Chandigarh: The Tribune. Retrieved 9 April 2010.
- Bhatia, Ramaninder K. (3 July 2007). "Villagers defend 'honour killing'". The Times Group (The Times of India). Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- Siwach, Sukhbir (31 March 2010). "Five to hang for khap death diktat". The Times Group (The Times of India). Retrieved 9 April 2010.
- Sen, Antara Dev (3 April 2010). "Feudal justice for a feudal crime". The Deccan Chronicle. Retrieved 10 April 2010.[dead link]
- "Death verdict for 5 in Karnal honour killing". Hindustan Times. 13 April 2010. Retrieved 29 April 2010.[dead link]
- "5 Get Death Sentence in Haryana Honour Killing Case Karnal". Outlook. 30 March 2010. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- "Court castigates police role". Tribune Company (Karnal: The Tribune). 31 March 2010. Retrieved 30 April 2010.
- Lohumi, Bhanu P. (30 March 2010). "Police drove them to death". Tribune Company (The Tribune). Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- "Honour killing: Notice to Haryana CS". The Times Group (The Times of India). 11 August 2007. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- Siwach, Sukhbir (2 April 2010). "Brutality of honour killing shocks court". The Times Group (The Times of India). Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- "Court defers sentencing in Karnal honour killing till Tuesday". Press Trust of India (PTI). 29 March 2010. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- Bhanu P., Lohumi (28 March 2010). "Haryana khap killings: Sentence today". Tribune Company (The Tribune). Retrieved 7 September 2010.
- Siwach, Sukhbir (26 March 2010). "Khap leader convicted for 'honour killing'". The Times of India. Retrieved 8 September 2010.
- Gayatri, Geetanjali; Bhanu P. Lohumi (31 March 2010). "They are both alive, claims the defence". Tribune Company (The Tribune). Retrieved 7 June 2010.
- Sharma, Nitish (30 March 2010). "Manoj-Bubbly murder case sentence today". The Pioneer (CMYK Printech Ltd.). Retrieved 28 May 2010.[dead link]
- Sharma, Nitish (31 March 2010). "Court cracks down on medieval system of justice". The Pioneer (CMYK Printech Ltd.). Retrieved 2 June 2010.[dead link]
- Lohumi, Bhanu P. (31 March 2010). "5 get death for 'honour killing': First capital punishment for such crime in Haryana". The Tribune. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- Sabharwal, Vijay (5 April 2010). "Men kill to protect honour, kin bear brunt". The Times of India (The Times Group). Retrieved 28 April 2010.
- "5 get death penalty in honour killing case". CNN-IBN. 31 March 2010. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- Sara, Sally (31 March 2010). "Five to be executed for honour killings". ABC News Australia. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- "Death penalty in India 'honour killings' case". BBC News Online. 30 March 2010. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- "Five 'honour killers' get death". Hindustan Times (Karnal: HT Media Limited). 30 March 2010. Retrieved 9 April 2010.
- "Karnal court to deliver verdict against Khap Panchayat killers". ZeeNews.com (Haryana: Press Trust of India). Retrieved 28 April 2010.
- "5 get death in Karnal honour killing case". Rediff.com (Rediff News Bureau). 30 March 2010. Retrieved 28 April 2010.
- "Death penalty for 5 involved in honour killing in Haryana". Chennai, India: The Hindu. 30 March 2010. Retrieved 28 April 2010.
- Siwach, Sukhbir (25 July 2007). "Honour over love: Over 100 killed every yr". The Times of India (The Times Group). Retrieved 28 April 2010.
- Sharma, Swati (7 June 2008). "Cops held guilty of failing in duty". Chandigarh: The Tribune. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- "India sentences five men to death for 'honour killings'". London: The Daily Telegraph. 31 March 2010. Retrieved 28 April 2010.
- "A Matter of Honour". Calcutta, India: The Telegraph. 28 April 2010. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- "A disgrace to the village". The Economist. 15 April 2010. Retrieved 20 May 2010.
- Lakshmi, Rama (25 May 2010). "5 sentenced to death in honor killing of Indian couple from same clan". The Washington Post. Retrieved 7 June 2010.
- "Indian 'honour killing' men face death". The Sydney Morning Herald (Fairfax Media). 31 March 2010. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- "Home Minister slams kangaroo courts". Times Now. 28 March 2010. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- "Verdict a deterrent for 'Taliban-style courts'". The Pioneer. 31 March 2010. Retrieved 16 September 2010.[dead link]
- "'Khap should be made tax-free'". The Indian Express. 3 September 2010. Retrieved 9 September 2010.
- Shah, Kunal M. (5 June 2010). "Ajai Sinha all set for 'Khap'". The Times of India (The Times Group). Retrieved 9 September 2010.
- Bhirani, Radhika (5 June 2010). "Ajay Sinha to bring honour killing issue on celluloid". Indo-Asian News Service (Thaindian News). Retrieved 9 September 2010.
- Sharma, Raj Kumar (15 July 2010). "Bollywood Lines Up Films Based on Honour Killings". Outlook. Retrieved 9 September 2010.
- Bhatia, Ramaninder K.; Sukhbir Siwach (1 April 2010). "Mother courage: She took on khaps to avenge son, bahu". The Times of India (The Times Group). Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- Sharma, Vrinda (2 April 2010). "Villages still in trauma after 'honour-killing' verdict". Chennai, India: The Hindu. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- "Honour killing: Groom's family wants death for all convicted". IANS (Thaindian News). 30 March 2010. Retrieved 7 June 2010.
- Dey, Anindo (1 April 2010). "Caste panchayats vow to continue tradition". The Times of India (The Times Group). Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- "Mother invites ire of other khaps". The Times of India (The Times Group). 2 April 2010. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- Sharma, Vrinda (2 April 2010). "Villages still in trauma after 'honour-killing' verdict". Chennai, India: The Hindu. Archived from the original on 6 April 2010. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- Sengupta, Nandita (4 April 2010). "'What real change, if men still kill their daughters?'". The Times of India (The Times Group). Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- "Vani Gopal Sharma seeks transfer; fears for her life after honour killing verdict". Tribune Company (The Tribune). 15 April 2010. Retrieved 20 May 2010.
- "Facing khap ire, Haryana judge seeks transfer". The Times of India (The Times Group). 17 April 2010. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- "Karnal judge seeks transfer 'for safety'". The Pioneer (CMYK Printech Ltd.). 16 April 2010. Retrieved 20 May 2010.[dead link]
- Bharadwaj, Ajay (17 April 2010). "Judge who awarded death to honour killers seeks transfer". DNA India (Diligent Media Corporation Ltd.). Retrieved 20 May 2010.
- Malik, Saurabh; Manish Sirhindi (6 April 2010). "SP, DC in dock over security to judge". Tribune Company (The Tribune). Retrieved 20 May 2010.
- "Threatened Karnal judge requests for transfer". Times Now. 18 April 2010. Retrieved 20 May 2010.
- "Divisions among Khap leaders, another meeting called May 23". khabrein.info. 13 April 2010. Retrieved 14 June 2010.
- "India caste councils back men over 'honour killings'". BBC News. 13 April 2010. Retrieved 14 June 2010.
- "Will Khap defy the constitution?". The Times of India (The Times Group). 13 April 2010. Retrieved 14 June 2010.
- Overdorf, Jason (5 May 2010). "India: Incest, or star-crossed love? A north Indian caste wants laws changed to match honor-killing codes". GlobalPost. Retrieved 14 June 2010.
- "Amend Hindu Marriage Act, demand Khaps". The Indian Express. 14 April 2010. Retrieved 14 June 2010.
- Chowdhary, Vikram (13 April 2010). "Khap panchayats meet in Haryana, remain defiant". NDTV. Retrieved 14 June 2010.
- "Khaps collect money for honour killers' kin". DNA India (Diligent Media Corporation Ltd.). 12 April 2010. Retrieved 14 June 2010.
- "Khap panchayats threaten MPs, Delhi blockade". CNN-IBN. 24 May 2010. Retrieved 14 June 2010.
- "Honour killings a shame on India: Chidambaram". Indo-Asian News Service (Thaindian News). 28 July 2009. Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- Siwach, Sukhbir (30 March 2010). "Law tightens noose around khaps". The Times of India (The Times Group). Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- Ahmad, Faraz (5 August 2010). "Law on honour killings soon: PC". Tribune Company (The Tribune). Retrieved 16 September 2010.
- Siwach, Sukhbir (24 August 2010). "Haryana against honour killing law". The Times of India (The Times Group). Retrieved 4 April 2010.
- "Honour killing: HC admits appeal against guilty verdict". Chandigarh: The Indian Express. 14 May 2010. Retrieved 20 May 2010.
- "HC Admits Appeal of 7 Convicts in Double Murder Case". Outlook. 13 May 2010. Retrieved 20 May 2010.
- "Honour killing: Convicts' appeal admitted". Tribune Company (The Tribune). 13 May 2010. Retrieved 20 May 2010.
- "Death sentence commuted in Manoj-Babli case". New Delhi: The Hindu. 12 March 2011. Retrieved 21 March 2011.
- "Dashing hopes, Emboldening khaps – The High Court verdict on the Manoj Babli case". New Delhi: Newsclick. 18 March 2011. Retrieved 21 March 2011.
- "Review: Satyamev Jayate Ep 5 touches draconian tradition of honour killings". DNA India. Jun 4, 2012. Retrieved 2013-08-17.
- "Satyamev Jayate speaks up for lovers!". The Times of India. Jun 4, 2012. Retrieved 2013-08-17.
- "Skeletons in the closet". Hindustan Times. August 3, 2013. Retrieved 2013-08-17.
- "Honour Bound". Indian Express. Aug 6, 2013. Retrieved 2013-08-17.