Mass spectrometry imaging

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) is a technique used in mass spectrometry to visualize the spatial distribution of molecules, as biomarkers, metabolites, peptides or proteins by their molecular masses. After collecting a mass spectrum at one spot, the sample is moved to reach another region, and so on, until the entire sample is scanned. By choosing a peak in the resulting spectra that corresponds to the compound of interest, the MS data is used to map its distribution across the sample. This results in pictures of the spatially resolved distribution of a compound pixel by pixel. Each data set contains a veritable gallery of pictures because any peak in each spectrum can be spatially mapped. Despite the fact that MSI has been generally considered a qualitative method, the signal generated by this technique is proportional to the relative abundance of the analyte. Therefore, quantification is possible, when its challenges are overcome. Although widely used traditional methodologies like radiochemistry and immunohistochemistry achieve the same goal as MSI, they are limited in their abilities to analyze multiple samples at once, and can prove to be lacking if researchers do not have prior knowledge of the samples being studied.[1] Most common ionization technologies in the field of MSI are DESI imaging, MALDI imaging and secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging (SIMS imaging).[2][3]

History[edit]

More than 50 years ago, IMS was introduced using secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) to study semiconductor surfaces by Castaing and Slodzian.[4] However, it was the pioneering work of Richard Caprioli and colleagues in the late 1990s, demostrating how matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) could be applied to visualize large biomolecules (as proteins and lipids) in cells and tissue to reveal the function of these molecules and how function is changed by diseases like cancer, which led to the widespread use of IMS. Nowadays, different ionization techniques have been used, including SIMS, MALDI and desorption electrospray ionization (DESI), as well as other technologies. Still, MALDI is the current dominant technology with regard to clinical and biological applications of MSI.[5]

Operation principle[edit]

The MSI is based on the spatial distribution of the sample. Therefore, the operation principle depends on the technique that is used to obtain the spatial information. The two techniques used in MSI are: microprobe and microscope.[6]

Microprobe[edit]

This technique is performed using a focused ionization beam to analyze a specific region of the sample by generating a mass spectrum. The mass spectrum is stored along with the spatial coordination where the measurement took place. Then, a new region is selected and analyzed by moving the sample or the ionization beam. This steps are repeated until the entire sample has been scanned. By coupling all individual mass spectra, a distribution map of intensities as a function of x and y locations can be plotted. As a result reconstructed molecular images of the sample are obtained.[6]

Microscope[edit]

In this technique, a 2D position-sensitive detector is used to measure the spatial origin of the ions generated at the sample surface by the ion optics of the instruments. The resolution of the spatial information will depend on the magnification of the microscope, the quality of the ions optics and the sensitivity of the detector. A new region still needs to be scanned, but the number of positions drastically reduces. The limitation of this mode is the finite depth of vision present with all microscopes.[6]

Ion source dependence[edit]

The ionization techniques available for IMS are suited to different applications. Some of the criteria for choosing the ionization method are the sample preparation requirement and the parameters of the measurement, as resolution, mass range and sensitivity. Based on that, the most common used ionization method are MALDI, SIMS AND DESI which are described below. Still, other minor techniques used are laser ablation electrospray ionization (LAESI) and laser-ablation-inductively coupled plasma (LA-ICP).

SIMS imaging[edit]

(A) Optical and (B–F) ion images of aggregation streams generated by 25 keV Bi3 TOF-SIMS analysis. (G) Optical and (H–L) ion images of aggregation streams generated by 40 keV C60 FTICR-SIMS analysis.[7]

Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) is used to analyze solid surfaces and thin films by sputtering the surface with a focused primary ion beam and collecting and analyzing ejected secondary ions. There are many different sources for a primary ion beam. However, the primary ion beam must contain ions that are at the higher end of the energy scale. Some common sources are: Cs+, O2+, O, Ar+ and Ga+.[8] SIMS imaging is performed in a manner similar to electron microscopy; the primary ion beam is emitted across the sample while secondary mass spectra are recorded.[9] SIMS proves to be advantageous in providing the highest image resolution but only over small area of samples.[10] More, this technique is widely regarded as one of the most sensitive forms of mass spectrometry as it can detect elements as small as 10−6-10−9.[11]

Multiplexed ion beam imaging (MIBI) is a SIMS method that uses metal isotope labeled antibodies to label compounds in biological samples.[12]

Developments within SIMS: Some chemical modifications have been made within SIMS to increase the efficiency of the process. There are currently two separate techniques being used to help increase the overall efficiency by increasing the sensitivity of SIMS measurements: matrix-enhanced SIMS (ME-SIMS) - This has the same sample preparation as MALDI does as this simulates the chemical ionization properties of MALDI. ME-SIMS does not sample nearly as much material. However, if the analyte being tested has a low mass value then it can produce a similar looking spectra to that of a MALDI spectra. ME-SIMS has been so effective that it has been able to detect low mass chemicals at sub cellular levels that was not possible prior to the development of the ME-SIMS technique.[3] The second technique being used is called sample metallization (Meta-SIMS) - This is the process of gold or silver addition to the sample. This forms a layer of gold or silver around the sample and it is normally no more than 1-3 nm thick. Using this technique has resulted in an increase of sensitivity for larger mass samples. The addition of the metallic layer also allows for the conversion of insulating samples to conducting samples, thus charge compensation within SIMS experiments is no longer required.[13]

MALDI imaging[edit]

Mouse kidney: (a) MALDI spectra from the tissue. (b) H&E stained tissue. N-glycans at m/z = 1996.7 (c) is located in the cortex and medulla while m/z = 2158.7 (d) is in the cortex, (e) An overlay image of these two masses, (f) untreated control tissue.[14]

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization can be used as a mass spectrometry imaging technique for relatively large molecules.[3] It has recently been shown that the most effective type of matrix to use is an ionic matrix for MALDI imaging of tissue. In this version of the technique the sample, typically a thin tissue section, is moved in two dimensions while the mass spectrum is recorded.[15] Although MALDI has the benefit of being able to record the spatial distribution of larger molecules, it comes at the cost of lower resolution than the SIMS technique. The limit for the lateral resolution for most of the modern instruments using MALDI is 20 m. MALDI experiments commonly use either an Nd:YAG (355 nm) or N2 (337 nm) laser for ionization.[3]

Pharmacodynamics and toxicodynamics in tissue have been studied by MALDI imaging.[16]

DESI imaging[edit]

Desorption electrospray Ionization is a less destructive technique, which couples simplicity and rapid analysis of the sample. The sample is sprayed with an electrically charged solvent mist at an angle that causes the ionization and desorption of various molecular species. Then, two-dimensional maps of the abundance of the selected ions in the surface of the sample in relation with the spatial distribution are generated.[17][10] This technique is applicable to solid, liquid, frozen and gaseous samples. Moreover, DESI allows analyzing a wide range of organic and biological compounds, as animal and plant tissues and cell culture samples, without complex sample preparation[5][10] Although, this technique has the poorest resolution among other, it can create high-quality image from a large area scan, as a whole body section scanning.[10]

Comparative between the ionization techniques[edit]

Comparison of typical parameters among IMS techniques[10]
Ionization Source Type of Ionization Analytes Spatial Resolution Mass Range
SIMS Ion gun Hard Elemental ions, small molecules, lipids <10 m 0-1000 Da
MALDI UV laser beam Soft Lipids, peptide, proteins 20 m 0-100 000 Da
DESI Solvent Spray Soft Small molecules, lipids, peptides 100 m 0-2000 Da

Combination of various IMS techniques and other imaging techniques[edit]

Combining various IMS techniques can be beneficial, since each particular technique has its own advantage. For example, when information regards both proteins and lipids are necessary in the same tissue section, performing DESI to analyze the lipid, followed by MALDI to obtain information about the peptide, and finalize applying a stain (haematoxylin and eosin) for medical diagnosis of the structural characteristic of the tissue.[10] On the other side of IMS with other imaging techniques, fluorescence staining with IMS and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with MRI can be highlighted. Fluorescence staining can give information of the appearance of some proteins present in any process inside a tissue, while IMS may give information about the molecular changes presented in that process. Combining both techniques, multimodal picture or even 3D images of the distribution of different molecules can be generated.[10] In contrast, MRI with IMS combines the continuous 3D representation of MRI image with detailed structural representation using molecular information from IMS. Even though, IMS itself can generate 3D images, the picture is just part of the reality due to the depth limitation in the analysis, while MRI provides, for example, detailed organ shape with additional anatomical information. This coupled technique can be beneficial for cancer precise diagnosis and neurosurgery.[10]

Data processing[edit]

Standard data format for mass spectrometry imaging datasets[edit]

A useful data format for IMS is imML data format (imzML), because several imaging MS software tools support it. The advantage of this format is the flexibility to exchange data between different instruments and data analysis software.[18]

Software[edit]

There are many free software packages available for visualization and mining of imaging mass spectrometry data. Converters from Thermo Fisher format, Analyze format, GRD format and Bruker format to imzML format were developed by the Computis project. Some software modules are also available for viewing mass spectrometry images in imzML format: Biomap (Novartis, free), Datacube Explorer (AMOLF, free),[19] EasyMSI (CEA), Mirion (JLU), MSiReader (NCSU, free)[20] and SpectralAnalysis.[21]

For processing .imzML files with the free statistical and graphics language R, a collection of R scripts is available, which permits parallel-processing of large files on a local computer, a remote cluster or on the Amazon cloud.[22]

Another free statistical package for processing imzML and Analyze 7.5 data in R exists, Cardinal .[23]

SPUTNIK [24] is an R package containing various filters to remove peaks characterized by an uncorrelated spatial distribution with the sample location.

Applications[edit]

A remarkable ability of IMS is to find out the localization of biomolecules in tissues, even though there are no previous information about them. This feature has made IMS an unique tool for clinical research and pharmacological research. It provides information about biomolecular changes related with diseases by tracking proteins, lipids, and cell metabolism. For example, identifying biomakers by IMS can show detailed cancer diagnosis. In addition, low cost imaging for pharmaceuticals studies can be acquired, such as images of molecular signatures that would be indicative of treatment response for a specific drug.[25][26]

Advantages, challenges and limitations[edit]

The main advantage of MSI for studying the molecules location and distribution within the tissue is that this analysis can provide either greater selectivity, more information or more accuracy than others. Moreover, this tool requires less investment of time and resources for similar results.[17] The table below shows a comparison of advantages and disadvantages of some available techniques, including MSI, correlated with drug distribution analysis.[4]

Comparison of advantages and disadvantages of techniques assessing drug distribution[4]
Methodology Question answered Advantages Disadvantages
Autoradiography Where and how much radioactivity Very high spatial resolution; reliable quantitation Ex vivo; requires radio-labelled drug; does not distinguish drug from metabolites.
Inmunohistochemistry Where Short processing time; easy interpretation; inexpensive Ex vivo; requires antibodies, which vary in sensitivity and specificity; difficulties assigning; detection threshold; lack of standard scoring system
Fluorescence Where In vivo possible; reasonable cost Not quantitative; poor resolution; autofluorescent interference
Positron emission tomography (PET) Where, what and activity In vivo possible; good resolution; can be coupled to CT X-ray, gamma camera Expensive; short-lived isotopes; need cyclotron to produce isotopes
Coherent anti-Stokes

Raman scattering

microscopy (CARS)

Where and what Label-free; sub-cellular spatial resolution Not quantitative; poor selectivity; high background noise
Electrochemical atomic

force microscopy (AFM)

Where and what Label-free imaging; high resolution Not quantitative; poor reproducibility; high background
MSI Where and what Multiplex; label-free imaging; good spatial resolution Semi-quantitative; ion-suppression effects; complex analysis

References[edit]

  1. ^ Monroe E, Annangudi S, Hatcher N, Gutstein H, Rubakhin S, Sweedler J (2008). "SIMS and MADLI MS Imaging of the spinal cord". Proteomics. 8 (18): 3746–3754. doi:10.1002/pmic.200800127. PMC 2706659. PMID 18712768.
  2. ^ Rohner T, Staab D, Stoeckli M (2005). "MALDI mass spectrometric imaging of biological tissue sections". Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 126 (1): 177–185. doi:10.1016/j.mad.2004.09.032. PMID 15610777.
  3. ^ a b c d McDonnell LA, Heeren RM (2007). "Imaging mass spectrometry". Mass Spectrometry Reviews. 26 (4): 606–43. Bibcode:2007MSRv...26..606M. doi:10.1002/mas.20124. hdl:1874/26394. PMID 17471576.
  4. ^ a b c Cobice, D F; Goodwin, R J A; Andren, P E; Nilsson, A; Mackay, C L; Andrew, R (2015-07-01). "Future technology insight: mass spectrometry imaging as a tool in drug research and development". British Journal of Pharmacology. 172 (13): 3266–3283. doi:10.1111/bph.13135. ISSN 1476-5381. PMC 4500365. PMID 25766375.
  5. ^ a b Addie, Ruben D.; Balluff, Benjamin; Bovée, Judith V. M. G.; Morreau, Hans; McDonnell, Liam A. (2015). "Current State and Future Challenges of Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Clinical Research". Analytical Chemistry. 87 (13): 6426–6433. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00416. PMID 25803124.
  6. ^ a b c McDonnell, Liam A.; Heeren, Ron M.A. (2007-07-01). "Imaging mass spectrometry". Mass Spectrometry Reviews. 26 (4): 606–643. Bibcode:2007MSRv...26..606M. doi:10.1002/mas.20124. hdl:1874/26394. ISSN 1098-2787. PMID 17471576.
  7. ^ DeBord J, Smith D, Anderton C, Heeren R, Paša-Tolić L, Gomer R, Fernandez-Lima F (2014). "Secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging of dictyostelium discoideum aggregation streams". PLoS ONE. 9 (6): e99319. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...999319D. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099319. PMC 4049834. PMID 24911189.
  8. ^ Amstalden Van Hove E, Smith D, Heeren R (2010). "A concise review of mass spectrometry imaging". Journal of Chromatography A. 1217 (25): 3946–3954. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2010.01.033. PMID 20223463.
  9. ^ Penner-Hahn, James E. (2013). "Chapter 2. Technologies for Detecting Metals in Single Cells. Section 2.1, Secondary Ion Mass Specctrometry". In Banci, Lucia (Ed.). Metallomics and the Cell. Metal Ions in Life Sciences. 12. Springer. pp. 15–40. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5561-1_2. ISBN 978-94-007-5560-4. PMID 23595669.electronic-book ISBN 978-94-007-5561-1 ISSN 1559-0836electronic-ISSN 1868-0402
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h Bodzon-Kulakowska, Anna; Suder, Piotr (2016-01-01). "Imaging mass spectrometry: Instrumentation, applications, and combination with other visualization techniques". Mass Spectrometry Reviews. 35 (1): 147–169. Bibcode:2016MSRv...35..147B. doi:10.1002/mas.21468. ISSN 1098-2787. PMID 25962625.
  11. ^ Chabala J, Soni K, Li J, Gavlirov K, Levi-Setti R (1995). "High resolution chemical imaging with scanning ion probe SIMS": 191–212.
  12. ^ Angelo, Michael; Bendall, Sean C; Finck, Rachel; Hale, Matthew B; Hitzman, Chuck; Borowsky, Alexander D; Levenson, Richard M; Lowe, John B; Liu, Scot D; Zhao, Shuchun; Natkunam, Yasodha; Nolan, Garry P (2014). "Multiplexed ion beam imaging of human breast tumors". Nature Medicine. 20 (4): 436–442. doi:10.1038/nm.3488. ISSN 1078-8956. PMC 4110905. PMID 24584119.
  13. ^ Delcorte A, Befahy S, Poleunis C, Troosters M, Bertrand P. "Improvements of metal adhesion to silicon films: a ToF-SIMS study".
  14. ^ Powers, Thomas W.; Neely, Benjamin A.; Shao, Yuan; Tang, Huiyuan; Troyer, Dean A.; Mehta, Anand S.; Haab, Brian B.; Drake, Richard R. (2014). "MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry Profiling of N-Glycans in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Clinical Tissue Blocks and Tissue Microarrays". PLoS ONE. 9 (9): e106255. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9j6255P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106255. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4153616. PMID 25184632.
  15. ^ Chaurand P, Norris JL, Cornett DS, Mobley JA, Caprioli RM (2006). "New developments in profiling and imaging of proteins from tissue sections by MALDI mass spectrometry". J. Proteome Res. 5 (11): 2889–900. doi:10.1021/pr060346u. PMID 17081040.
  16. ^ Patel, Ekta (1 January 2015). "MALDI-MS imaging for the study of tissue pharmacodynamics and toxicodynamics". Bioanalysis. 7 (1): 91–101. doi:10.4155/bio.14.280. PMID 25558938.
  17. ^ a b Nilsson, Anna; Goodwin, Richard J. A.; Shariatgorji, Mohammadreza; Vallianatou, Theodosia; Webborn, Peter J. H.; Andrén, Per E. (2015-02-03). "Mass Spectrometry Imaging in Drug Development". Analytical Chemistry. 87 (3): 1437–1455. doi:10.1021/ac504734s. ISSN 0003-2700. PMID 25526173.
  18. ^ A. Römpp; T. Schramm; A. Hester; I. Klinkert; J.P. Both; R.M.A. Heeren; M. Stoeckli; B. Spengler (2011). "Chapter imzML: Imaging Mass Spectrometry Markup Language: A Common Data Format for Mass Spectrometry Imaging in Data Mining in Proteomics: From Standards to Applications". Methods in Molecular Biology, Humana Press, New York. 696. pp. 205–224.
  19. ^ Klinkert, I.; Chughtai, K.; Ellis, S. R.; Heeren, R. M. A. (2014). "Methods for Full Resolution Data Exploration and Visualization for Large 2D and 3D Mass Spectrometry Imaging Datasets". International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 362: 40–47. Bibcode:2014IJMSp.362...40K. doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2013.12.012.
  20. ^ Robichaud, G.; Garrard, K. P.; Barry, J. A.; Muddiman, D. C. (2013). "MSiReader: An Open-Source Interface to View and Analyze High Resolving Power MS Imaging Files on Matlab Platform". Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 24 (5): 718–721. Bibcode:2013JASMS..24..718R. doi:10.1007/s13361-013-0607-z. PMC 3693088. PMID 23536269.
  21. ^ Race, A. M.; Palmer, A. D.; Dexter, A.; Steven, R. T.; Styles, I. B.; Bunch, J. (2016). "SpectralAnalysis: software for the masses". Analytical Chemistry. 88 (19): 9451–9458. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01643. PMID 27558772.
  22. ^ Gamboa-Becerra, Roberto; Ramírez-Chávez, Enrique; Molina-Torres, Jorge; Winkler, Robert (2015-07-01). "MSI.R scripts reveal volatile and semi-volatile features in low-temperature plasma mass spectrometry imaging (LTP-MSI) of chilli (Capsicum annuum)". Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 407 (19): 5673–5684. doi:10.1007/s00216-015-8744-9. PMID 26007697.
  23. ^ Bemis, Kyle D.; Harry, April; Eberlin, Livia S.; Ferreira, Christina; van de Ven, Stephanie M.; Mallick, Parag; Stolowitz, Mark; Vitek, Olga (2015-03-15). "Cardinal: an R package for statistical analysis of mass spectrometry-based imaging experiments". Bioinformatics. 31 (14): 2418–2420. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv146. PMC 4495298. PMID 25777525.
  24. ^ Inglese, Paolo; Correia, Gonçalo; Takats, Zoltan; Nicholson, Jeremy K.; Glen, Robert C. (2018). "SPUTNIK: An R package for filtering of spatially related peaks in mass spectrometry imaging data". Bioinformatics. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty622. PMID 30010780.
  25. ^ Addie, Ruben D.; Balluff, Benjamin; Bovée, Judith V. M. G.; Morreau, Hans; McDonnell, Liam A. (2015-07-07). "Current State and Future Challenges of Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Clinical Research". Analytical Chemistry. 87 (13): 6426–6433. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00416. ISSN 0003-2700. PMID 25803124.
  26. ^ Aichler, Michaela; Walch, Axel (April 2015). "MALDI Imaging mass spectrometry: current frontiers and perspectives in pathology research and practice". Laboratory Investigation. 95 (4): 422–431. doi:10.1038/labinvest.2014.156. ISSN 1530-0307. PMID 25621874.