This article's lead sectionmay be too short to adequately summarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article.(March 2023)
In mathematics, we can define norms for the elements of a vector space. When the vector space in question consists of matrices, these are called matrix norms.
What sets matrix norms apart from other vector norms is how they interact with multiplication, either among themselves or with vectors, which themselves may have other norms defined on them.
Given a field of either real or complex numbers, let be the K-vector space of matrices with rows and columns and entries in the field . A matrix norm is a norm on .
This article will always write such norms with double vertical bars (like so: ). Thus, the matrix norm is a function that must satisfy the following properties:[1][2]
For all scalars and matrices ,
(positive-valued)
(definite)
(absolutely homogeneous)
(sub-additive or satisfying the triangle inequality)
The only feature distinguishing matrices from rearranged vectors is multiplication. Matrix norms are particularly useful if they are also sub-multiplicative:[1][2][3]
Suppose a vector norm on and a vector norm on are given. Any matrix A induces a linear operator from to with respect to the standard basis, and one defines the corresponding induced norm or operator norm or subordinate norm on the space of all matrices as follows:
where denotes the supremum. This norm measures how much the mapping induced by can stretch vectors.
Depending on the vector norms , used, notation other than can be used for the operator norm.
If the p-norm for vectors () is used for both spaces and then the corresponding operator norm is:[2]
These induced norms are different from the "entry-wise"p-norms and the Schatten p-norms for matrices treated below, which are also usually denoted by
In the special cases of the induced matrix norms can be computed or estimated by
which is simply the maximum absolute column sum of the matrix;
which is simply the maximum absolute row sum of the matrix.
For example, for
we have that
In the special case of (the Euclidean norm or -norm for vectors), the induced matrix norm is the spectral norm. (The two values do not coincide in infinite dimensions — see Spectral radius for further discussion.) The spectral norm of a matrix is the largest singular value of (i.e., the square root of the largest eigenvalue of the matrix where denotes the conjugate transpose of ):[5]
where represents the largest singular value of matrix Also,
where is the Frobenius norm. Equality holds if and only if the matrix is a rank-one matrix or a zero matrix. This inequality can be derived from the fact that the trace of a matrix is equal to the sum of its eigenvalues.
Suppose is an operator norm on the space of square matrices
induced by vector norms and .
Then, the operator norm is a sub-multiplicative matrix norm:
Moreover, any such norm satisfies the inequality
(1)
for all positive integers r, where ρ(A) is the spectral radius of A. For symmetric or hermitianA, we have equality in (1) for the 2-norm, since in this case the 2-norm is precisely the spectral radius of A. For an arbitrary matrix, we may not have equality for any norm; a counterexample would be
which has vanishing spectral radius. In any case, for any matrix norm, we have the spectral radius formula:
Let be the columns of matrix . From the original definition, the matrix presents n data points in m-dimensional space. The norm[6] is the sum of the Euclidean norms of the columns of the matrix:
The norm as an error function is more robust, since the error for each data point (a column) is not squared. It is used in robust data analysis and sparse coding.
For p, q ≥ 1, the norm can be generalized to the norm as follows:
When p = q = 2 for the norm, it is called the Frobenius norm or the Hilbert–Schmidt norm, though the latter term is used more frequently in the context of operators on (possibly infinite-dimensional) Hilbert space. This norm can be defined in various ways:
where are the singular values of . Recall that the trace function returns the sum of diagonal entries of a square matrix.
The Frobenius norm is an extension of the Euclidean norm to and comes from the Frobenius inner product on the space of all matrices.
Frobenius norm is often easier to compute than induced norms, and has the useful property of being invariant under rotations (and unitary operations in general). That is, for any unitary matrix . This property follows from the cyclic nature of the trace ():
and analogously:
where we have used the unitary nature of (that is, ).
It also satisfies
and
where is the Frobenius inner product, and Re is the real part of a complex number (irrelevant for real matrices)
Note that in some literature (such as Communication complexity), an alternative definition of max-norm, also called the -norm, refers to the factorization norm:
The Schatten p-norms arise when applying the p-norm to the vector of singular values of a matrix.[2] If the singular values of the matrix are denoted by σi, then the Schatten p-norm is defined by
These norms again share the notation with the induced and entry-wise p-norms, but they are different.
All Schatten norms are sub-multiplicative. They are also unitarily invariant, which means that for all matrices and all unitary matrices and .
The most familiar cases are p = 1, 2, ∞. The case p = 2 yields the Frobenius norm, introduced before. The case p = ∞ yields the spectral norm, which is the operator norm induced by the vector 2-norm (see above). Finally, p = 1 yields the nuclear norm (also known as the trace norm, or the Ky Fan 'n'-norm[7]), defined as:
Another source of inspiration for matrix norms arises from considering a matrix as the adjacency matrix of a weighted, directed graph.[9] The so-called "cut norm" measures how close the associated graph is to being bipartite:
where A ∈ Km×n.[9][10][11] Equivalent definitions (up to a constant factor) impose the conditions 2|S| > n & 2|T| > m; S = T; or S ∩ T = ∅.[10]
The cut-norm is equivalent to the induced operator norm ‖·‖∞→1, which is itself equivalent to another norm, called the Grothendieck norm.[11]
To define the Grothendieck norm, first note that a linear operator K1 → K1 is just a scalar, and thus extends to a linear operator on any Kk → Kk. Moreover, given any choice of basis for Kn and Km, any linear operator Kn → Km extends to a linear operator (Kk)n → (Kk)m, by letting each matrix element on elements of Kk via scalar multiplication. The Grothendieck norm is the norm of that extended operator; in symbols:[11]
The Grothendieck norm depends on choice of basis (usually taken to be the standard basis) and k.
for some positive numbers r and s, for all matrices . In other words, all norms on are equivalent; they induce the same topology on . This is true because the vector space has the finite dimension.
Moreover, for every vector norm on , there exists a unique positive real number such that is a sub-multiplicative matrix norm for every .
A sub-multiplicative matrix norm is said to be minimal, if there exists no other sub-multiplicative matrix norm satisfying .
^Malek-Shahmirzadi, Massoud (1983). "A characterization of certain classes of matrix norms". Linear and Multilinear Algebra. 13 (2): 97–99. doi:10.1080/03081088308817508. ISSN0308-1087.
^Horn, Roger A. (2012). Matrix analysis. Johnson, Charles R. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 340–341. ISBN978-1-139-77600-4. OCLC817236655.
^Carl D. Meyer, Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra, §5.2, p.281, Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics, June 2000.
^Ding, Chris; Zhou, Ding; He, Xiaofeng; Zha, Hongyuan (June 2006). "R1-PCA: Rotational Invariant L1-norm Principal Component Analysis for Robust Subspace Factorization". Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning. ICML '06. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA: ACM. pp. 281–288. doi:10.1145/1143844.1143880. ISBN1-59593-383-2.
^Ciarlet, Philippe G. (1989). Introduction to numerical linear algebra and optimisation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. p. 57. ISBN0521327881.
^ abLovász László (2012). "The cut distance". Large Networks and Graph Limits. AMS Colloquium Publications. Vol. 60. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. pp. 127–131. ISBN978-0-8218-9085-1. Note that Lovász rescales ‖A‖□ to lie in [0, 1].