MediaWiki talk:Titleblacklist

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following instructions were copied from mw:Extension:Title Blacklist.

The title blacklist is maintained as a system message MediaWiki:Titleblacklist.

This page consists of regular expressions, each on a separate line. For example:

Foo <autoconfirmed|noedit|errmsg=blacklisted-testpage> 
Bar #No one should create article about it

There is no need to use "^" at the beginning and "$" at the end; these are added automatically.

Each entry may also contain optional attributes, enclosed in <> and divided by |

  • autoconfirmed — only non-autoconfirmed users are unable to create/upload/move such pages
  • noedit — users are also unable to edit this article
  • casesensitive — don't ignore case when checking title for being blacklisted
  • errmsg — the name of the message that should be displayed instead of standard

When the action is blocked, one of the following messages is displayed together with the filter row (as $1): titleblacklist-forbidden-edit, titleblacklist-forbidden-move, titleblacklist-forbidden-new-account or titleblacklist-forbidden-upload. Generic filenames have their own custom error message, MediaWiki:Titleblacklist-custom-imagename.

There is also MediaWiki:Titlewhitelist and a global title blacklist.

Only administrators and template editors can override this list on all actions. Account creators can override this list on account creations only.

AEEK INKA F.C.[edit]

I'd like to request a move for the article AEEK INKA F.C. to be moved to AEEK SYN.KA F.C. due to the name change of the club.

Blacklisted usernames[edit]

I notice that there are a number of <newaccountonly> rules in the blacklist despite it now being supposedly being managed from Meta per phab:T38939. Is this incorrect, or can the local entries be removed and copied to Meta as appropriate? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:53, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

  • My understanding is that their presence here will have no effect, and judging by some recent accounts I've seen, that is true. I'd say bring them up at meta, though in some recent discussions the folks there have been hesitant to blacklist names of interest to one project only. Kind of a catch-22, that... CrowCaw 17:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Yeah, comparing [1] with [2] suggests that it is not effective. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:55, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
I've removed these entries. I'll ask about adding some of them on meta:Talk:Title blacklist; many of them are too broad for a global project, I think. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
If a group of naughty accounts are being created from enwiki and editing only here, then an entry in the local blacklist makes sense. Just like how accounts aren't globally locked when they vandalize on one wiki. When just used on enwiki-specific vandalism, this won't have any negative effects on SUL finalization. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 03:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
@Ajraddatz: I think the problem discussed above is that adding them here doesn't actually work - the accounts still get created. — xaosflux Talk 04:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
If the account creation process is happening here, then the local blacklist should prevent them from being made. If the master tries to bypass the local blacklist by creating from another project, then that would be enough reason to add the name to the global blacklist. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 05:10, 21 January 2018 (UTC) Oh no, I just didn't read through the whole bug. I didn't realize that the functionality had been completely switched off at the local level. Obviously at Meta we should take any such reasonable requests then. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 05:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Tweak "no 10 capitals without lowercase" regexp to ignore username when counting[edit]

See [3]. I believe the regexp responsible (I do not know which) should be changed from (...) to (^User:[^\/]*\/|^)(...). TigraanClick here to contact me 17:26, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Support As the person who experienced the problem. !dave 18:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Weird character spam[edit]

@Cyp: and @DoRD: - I added ①①④④②⑥⑤⑤① to the global list at meta:Title_blacklist, if someone wants to work up a better regex for this we can consolidate it there. — xaosflux Talk 18:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

@Xaosflux: Thanks. It seems to have stopped for now by itself. Maybe .*[①-⑨]{6}.* would catch future weird spam without too many false positives. Κσυπ Cyp   18:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
@Cyp: added at meta. — xaosflux Talk 19:09, 18 January 2018 (UTC)


Since people is trying to recreate Freshdesk article and drafts all of time, Freshdesk should be listed at title blacklist. 2A02:C7F:9659:4500:3DDD:F1F8:F91:7058 (talk) 15:29, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

That's unnecessary because Freshdesk was salted after it was last deleted. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Someone has created a draft version to get around the full create protection and it was listed for MfD. 2A02:C7F:9659:4500:3DDD:F1F8:F91:7058 (talk) 15:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Some people that works at Freshdesk has trying to get the page unsalted and nope. We now need to put Freshdesk into title blacklist because someone has created a draft version. 2A02:C7F:9659:4500:9158:3C4B:7629:188F (talk) 19:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
It now time to put Freshdesk into title blacklist now both mainspace and draft version is full create protected. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:E563:6FD1:3949:3B5F (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Prophet Daddy Hezekiah[edit]

You might need to do something around Daddy Hezekial as the author is running at as Prof and Prophet and will probably find other variants. KJP1 (talk) 16:50, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Blacklisted title effects?[edit]

I have TE rights, and so I could create Template:Ship/doc/fixed prefix: documentation. I got the warning that prefix: is blacklisted here, and that editing required TE rights.

I can work with that, but my question is: are there more drawbacks from this (apart from the fact that editing is limited)? I'd like to use the word "prefix", as in Ship prefix. Any advice? (move, continue, else)? FYI, when I moved a page into a "prefix:" pagename, I do not remember seeing that warning. Just to say: is there a leak? - DePiep (talk) 17:41, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Others can edit the page. The limitation is only on creation. It only applies to "prefix:" with a colon. It's aimed at users who click a red "You may create the page ..." link after doing a prefix search with "prefix:" in the search. But the search software has actually improved to no longer offer silly creation links for such searches. We may not need the blacklist entry now but I guess it's safer to keep it. PrimeHunter (talk) 17:53, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Green tickY thx - DePiep (talk) 22:14, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Add George Zink into title blacklist[edit]

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anika86p, lot of socks keeps on recreating it under other titles. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:1C30:1B8B:229F:3228 (talk) 17:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Why was a name blacklisted?[edit]

In general is there a way to find out why an article name was blacklisted? Kendall-K1 (talk) 20:30, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

IPA redirect[edit]

Can someone create:

Thanks, – Julia (talk) 01:11, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

 Done Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:39, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Prem Khan[edit]

Hey all, is there a way to prevent creation of articles about Prem Khan? This has been an ongoing issue for a few years. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Washim Rahman (and the related archive linked therein). Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

put .*prem.*khan.* in spam titles Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:40, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Great, thank you. Regex frightens me. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)