Road to Emmaus appearance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Meeting at Emmaus)
Jump to: navigation, search
"Supper at Emmaus" redirects here. For other uses, see Supper at Emmaus (disambiguation).
Jesus and the two disciples On the Road to Emmaus, by Duccio, 1308-1311, Museo dell'Opera del Duomo, Siena.

The Road to Emmaus appearance is one of the early resurrection appearances of Jesus after his crucifixion and the discovery of the empty tomb.[1][2][3] Both the Meeting on the road to Emmaus and the subsequent Supper at Emmaus, depicting the meal that Jesus had with two disciples after the encounter on the road, have been popular subjects in art.

Biblical accounts[edit]

Altobello Melone - The Road to Emmaus

N. T. Wright considers the detailed narration of the Emmaus journey in Luke 24:13-35 as one of the best sketches of a biblical scene in the Gospel of Luke.[4] Jan Lambrecht, citing D.P. Moessner, writes: "the Emmaus story is one of Luke's 'most exquisite literary achievements'."[5] It describes the encounter on the road to Emmaus and the supper at Emmaus, and states that a disciple named Cleopas was walking towards Emmaus with another disciple when they met Jesus. They did not recognize him, and discussed their sadness at recent events with him. They persuaded him to come and eat with them, and in the meal event at Emmaus they recognized him.

Theme[edit]

Though it may be said that its main subject is proving the Resurrection by the appearance of Jesus, this narrative seems not saying anything about proving the event. R. W. L. Moberly suggests that "the story is best understood as an exposition of the hermeneutical issue of discernment, focussing specifically on the question, 'How does one discern the risen Christ?'"[6] Alfred McBride says that the Emmaus narrative concerns about "the evolution of the awareness of the two disciples, from despair over Christ's death to faith in his resurrection". Used to perceive Christian spiritual growth, this narrative considered as a model for a Christians' own journey to a deeper faith and as an instrument to help others do the same journey.[7]

Alleged parallels[edit]

The Gospel of Mark 16:12-13 has a similar account that describes the appearance of Jesus to two disciples while they were walking in the country, at about the same time in the Gospel narrative,[8] although it does not name the disciples or the destination as Emmaus:

Afterward Jesus appeared in a different form to two of them while they were walking in the country. These returned and reported it to the rest; but they did not believe them either.[9]

It has also been suggested the Ethiopian eunuch story (Acts 8:26-40) is an Emmaus narrative's "much discussed parallel", since there are some recognizable similarities between the two.[10] Jan Lambrecht says, "Each event culminates with a ritual, the breaking and distributing of bread at Emmaus and the baptism of the Ethiopian along the road. ... What remains as a common theme in both stories is the necessary hermeneutical connection between the Scriptures and the Jesus event. The Scriptures are to be interpreted in the light of 'the good news of Jesus' (Acts 8) and the Jesus events can only be understood in light of the Scriptures (Lk 24)."[11]

Unnamed disciple[edit]

There are many possible names for the disciple accompanying Cleopas according to a number of traditions. Some of them has been suggested: Simon/Symeon, according to several documents and manuscripts; Ammaon/Amaon, accoding to Saint Ambrose, which probably a spelling error for "Symeon"; Nathanael, according to Saint Epiphanius' Panarion; Nicodemus, according to the Arabic apocryphal Gospel of John; Luke the Evangelist, according to the Book of the Bee; Philip the Deacon; James, brother of Jesus; the daughter or the wife of "Cleopas", when he is considered the same person as Clopas.[12][13]

John Gillman, in a Festschrift to Jan Lambrecht, writes that "Luke's failure to identify Cleophas' companion by either name or gender may well be a strategy of inviting the reader to identify implicitly with that person, and thus to make the journey as Cleophas' companion."[14]

The journey to Emmaus[edit]

The two disciples were walking along the road, heading to Emmaus, deep in solemn and serious discussion, when Jesus met them. They could not recognize Jesus, and saw him as a stranger. In Homilies on the Gospels (Hom. 23), Saint Gregory the Great says:

They did not, in fact, have faith in him, yet they were talking about him. The Lord therefore appeared to them, but did not show them a face they could recognize. In this way the Lord enacted outwardly, before their physical eyes, what was going on in them inwardly, before the eyes of their hearts. For inwardly they simultaneously loved him and doubted him; therefore the Lord was outwardly present to them, and at the same time did not reveal his identity. Since they were speaking about him, he showed them his presence, but since they doubted him, he hid from them the appearance by which they could have recognized him.[15]

Jesus let them told about their anxieties and pains; he let them grieved and mourned by expressing the root causes. Jesus empathetically listened to them, who poured out their crises and doubts, and used scriptures so that they could better understand "suffering and glory".[16] During the journey to Emmaus, according to Alfred McBride, Jesus patiently guided the two disciples "from hopelessness to celebration"[7] and also intended to nourish the two disciples' faith to such an extent that they can see "his real presence in the breaking of the bread".[17]

From a pastoral perspective, John P. Mossi writes that meditating upon the "Emmaus Pilgrimage" may helps one when experiencing one's own "dark nights". During such course of action, according to Mossi, one should realizes that Jesus compassionately walks as a friend on one's own journey, empathetically listens one's sorrows and hesitations, and spends quality time accompanying one goes through the process of inner healing.[18]

"Stay with us"[edit]

Luke 24:28-29 states that Jesus stayed and had supper with the two disciples after the encounter on the road:

As they approached the village to which they were going, Jesus acted as if he were going farther. But they urged him strongly, "Stay with us, for it is nearly evening; the day is almost over." So he went in to stay with them.[19]

The two disciples showed their openness and caring to the unknown stranger, who is Jesus, by inviting him to stay with them, to join in meal and companionship. Jan Lambrecht argues that such attitudes made Jesus able to change them deeply: "By the offer of hospitality the Emmaus companions were able to transcend their self-concern, sadness, foolishness and slowness of heart, thus preparing them for the revelatory experience around the table where they were nourished."[20]

The meal at Emmaus[edit]

At first, Jesus appears to Cleopas and one other disciple, but "their eyes were holden" so that they could not recognize him. Later, "in the breaking of bread" (Luke 24:30), "their eyes were opened" and they recognized him (Luke 24:31). B. P. Robinson argues that this means that the recognition occurred in the course of the meal,[21] while Raymond Blacketer notes that "many, perhaps even most, commentators, ancient and modern and in-between, have seen the revelation of Jesus' identity in the breaking of bread as having some kind of eucharistic referent or implication."[22]

In his apostolic letter Mane nobiscum Domine, Saint John Paul II says that when the two disciples urged Jesus to stay with them, Jesus afterwards responded by giving them a way to stay in him, by entering into "a profound communion with Jesus" through the "Sacrament of the Eucharist" (cf. John 15:4). Soon after Jesus agreed their request to stay, according to the Pope, "Jesus' face would disappear, yet the Master would 'stay' with them, hidden in the 'breaking of the bread' which had opened their eyes to recognize him. ... When minds are enlightened and hearts are enkindled, signs begin to 'speak'."[23]

Return to Jerusalem[edit]

Luke 24:32 states that the two disciples' hearts were "burning" during their conversation with Jesus along the way to Emmaus, especially when he explained the Scriptures. They have gone through "a journey symbolizing their change of hearts from 'sad' to 'burning'", and they immediately returned to Jerusalem to share their experience with other fellows (Luke 24:33).[24]

Alfred McBride says that "enthusiasm flooded their whole being" when the two disciples have "encounter[ed] the Risen Christ" in the supper at Emmaus. They sensed a must to share their happiness and the good news with another so that they were willing to go through a long walk back to Jerusalem.[25] Saint John Paul II argues that the two disciples realized "the duty to be a missionary" after "entering into communion with Christ" at the meal event, relates it with the dismissal at the end of the Eucharistic Celebration.[23]

In art[edit]

Christ at Emmaus by Rembrandt, 1648, Louvre.

Both the encounter on the road and the ensuing supper have been depicted in art, but the supper has received more attention. Medieval art tends to show a moment before Jesus is recognized; Christ wears a large floppy hat to help explain the initial lack of recognition by the disciples. This is often a large pilgrim's hat with badges or, rarely, a Jewish hat. However, the depiction of the supper has been a more popular theme, at least since the Renaissance, showing Jesus eating with the disciples. Often the moment of recognition is shown.

Rembrandt's 1648 depiction of the Supper builds on the etching that he did six years earlier, in which the disciple on the left had risen, hands clasped in prayer. In both depictions, the disciples are startled and in awe but not in fear. The servant is oblivious to the theophanic moment taking place during the supper.[26]

Caravaggio's painting in London and his painting in Milan were six years apart, and both imitate natural color very well, but both were criticized for lack of decorum. Caravaggio depicted Jesus without a beard, and the London painting shows fruits on the table that are out of season. Moreover, the inn keeper is shown serving with a hat.[27]

Some other artists who have portrayed the Supper are Jacopo Bassano, Pontormo, Vittore Carpaccio, Philippe de Champaigne, Albrecht Dürer, Benedetto Gennari, Jacob Jordaens, Marco Marziale, Pedro Orrente, Tintoretto, Titian, Velázquez, and Paolo Veronese. The supper was also the subject of one of Han van Meegeren's most successful Vermeer forgeries.

In literary art, the Emmaus theme is treated as early as the 12th century by Durham poet Laurentius in a semidramatic Latin poem.[28]

Gallery of art[edit]

In music[edit]

The gospel was the prescribed reading for Easter Monday in Lutheran Leipzig at Bach's time. He composed several church cantatas for the occasion, including the chorale cantata Bleib bei uns, denn es will Abend werden, BWV 6, in 1725.

Josef Rheinberger composed in 1855 a motet Abendlied on a verse from the gospel narration, "Bleib bei uns" (Bide with us).

Jungian Perspective[edit]

Carl Jung regarded the road to Emmaus appearance as an instance of the mythological theme of the magical traveling companion that still appears spontaneously in dreams today.[29]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Craddock 1991, p. 284
  2. ^ Phillips 2005, pp. 297-230
  3. ^ Luke 24
  4. ^ Wright 2004, p. 292
  5. ^ Lambrecht 2002, p. 179
  6. ^ Moberly 2000, p. 46
  7. ^ a b McBride 1992, p. 210
  8. ^ The Catholic Comparative New Testament 2006, p. 589
  9. ^ Mark 16:12-13 (NIV)
  10. ^ Lambrecht 2002, p. 169
  11. ^ Lambrecht 2002, p. 170
  12. ^ Metzger 1980, pp. 40-41
  13. ^ Thiede 2006, pp. 94-96
  14. ^ Lambrecht 2002, p. 184
  15. ^ Gregory I, p. 55
  16. ^ Wicks 2000, p. 154
  17. ^ McBride 1992, p. 132
  18. ^ Wicks 2000, pp. 154-155
  19. ^ Luke 24:28-29 (NIV)
  20. ^ Lambrecht 2002, p. 185
  21. ^ Robinson 1984, p. 484
  22. ^ Blacketer 2003, p. 323
  23. ^ a b John Paul II (7 October 2004). "Mane nobiscum Domine". Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 
  24. ^ Lambrecht 2002, p. 183
  25. ^ McBride 1992, p. 214
  26. ^ Durham 2004, p. 144
  27. ^ Apostolos-Cappadona 1995, p. 64
  28. ^ Kindermann 1968, pp. 79-100
  29. ^ Jung, C.G. (1968), Psychology and Alchemy, Collected Works, Volume 12, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-01831-6 page ??

References[edit]