Millimeter cloud radar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
MIRA36 cloud radar at Tito Scalo (Potenza, Italy).[1]
ARM Millimeter Cloud Radar (MMCR) operating at 35 GHz.

Millimeter-wave cloud radars, also denominated cloud radars, are radar systems designed to monitor clouds with operating frequencies between 24 and 110 GHz (Table 1). Accordingly, their wavelengths range from 1 mm to 1.11 cm, about ten times shorter than those used in conventional S band radars such as NEXRAD.


Table 1: Millimetre cloud radar operating bands.[edit]

Band name Frequency range [GHz] Wavelength range [mm]
Ka 24-40 7.5-11.1
W 75-100 2.7-4.0

The main purpose of these radars is the investigation of cloud properties and evolution. They typically operate at 35 GHz in the Ka band and at 94 GHz in the W band, where the atmospheric transmission is maximum. These frequencies correspond to wavelengths around 8 and 3 mm. Millimeter cloud radars have a high temporal and range resolution: temporal resolution is adjustable and typically ranges from 1 to 10 seconds, while the range resolution ranges from a few meters for cloud radars using frequency modulation of the transmitted signal (e.g. 4 m for the Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave (FMCW) 94 GHz cloud radar operating at UK Met Office), to several meters for magnetron based cloud radars (e.g. from 15 to 60 m for MIRA systems). The maximum detection range is between 14 and 20 km and the Doppler velocity resolution is of few cm/s. Most of the cloud radars are polarimetric, being able to measure the particles irregularity by means of the linear depolarization ratio (LDR). Usually they operate pointing to the zenith, but an increasing number of them have nowadays scanning units, that allow to retrieve additional information such as volume information when performing various Range Height Indicator (RHI) scans at different angles and at a relatively high speed, and vertical wind profiles, when performing Plan Position Indicator (PPI) at few degrees from the zenith.

Regarding the different cloud radars operating wavelengths, it must be taken into account that longer wavelengths are less attenuated by drizzle and rain, while shorter wavelengths are more sensitive to smaller particles. Accordingly, radar signals are less attenuated in Ka-band than in W-band, while W-band radars are able to detect smaller particles. Even though, the cloud radar beams are much less attenuated by cloud or precipitation particles than the lidar beam.

Cloud radars are used nowadays to determine cloud boundaries (e.g. cloud bases and tops) and to estimate clouds microphysical properties, such as particle size and mass content, which aids in understanding how clouds reflect, absorb and transform radiant energy passing though the atmosphere. They are also intensively used to investigate fog. Furthermore, cloud radars are being used for entomology studies for more than 40 years, since Ka and W-band radars detect almost exclusively insect targets on warm cloudless days,[2][3] and more recently are also used for the study of giant aerosols.[4][5]

Even though most cloud radar systems are ground-based, they can also be airborne and space-based. Examples of airborne systems are cloud radars installed on HALO (High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft) and Wyoming KingAir Research Aircraft. An example of spaceborne Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR) is operating in the CloudSAT satellite since 2006. The first spaceborne CPR with Doppler capability will be launched in 2016 within the Earth Clouds, Aerosols and Radiation Explorer (EarthCARE) mission.

Measuring with a radar: from IQ to spectra[edit]

Pulsed Radar systems are considered active instruments because they transmit in the atmosphere an electromagnetic wave and receive the signal reflected back from the atmosphere. In such radars, the antenna sends out the electromagnetic wave, and then collects the returned signal. Radars are composed of different hardware parts, each of which contains different elements. The figure on page 9 in Clothiaux et al. 1996[6] is showing such units.

The electromagnetic wave sent in the atmosphere is an EM wave of the form shown in figure on page 10 of.[6] Such wave is generated by an oscillator in the transmitter unit and then transferred through wave guides to the antenna, which radiates it in the atmosphere. The theory of propagating waves in rectangular shaped waveguides having a vertical axis of symmetry shows that by setting appropriate dimensions of the waveguide, the resulting electric field is propagating parallel to the interior space of the waveguide in the vertical direction, having a y sinusoidal in time component (transverse wave).

The expression of the electric field radiated at a distance far from the antenna is, adopting complex notation in spherical coordinate system :






where is the carrier frequency of the wave, is the time, is the speed of light, is the distance from the antenna, is the wavenumber and is the wavelength, while is the amplitude of the wave which depends on the power delivered to the antenna, on its characteristics and it is affected by the power losses in the waveguides. The function is a modulating function which is 1 when its argument is between 0 and , and 0 elsewhere. Therefore, such electromagnetic (EM) field is oscillating sinusoidally in time within the pulse width and is zero outside the pulse envelope, as shown in figure 3 on page 10 of.[6] This EM wave is sent to the atmosphere: every pulse is scattered by a volume of air filled with hydrometeors and comes back to the radar. The antenna collects the returned signal, which is then filtered to remove the high carrier frequency, amplified and then downconverted and digitized.

The scattered electric field collected by the antenna is a composite of discrete echoes from all the scatterers contained in the volume and can be written as:






where is the amplitude of the electric field scattered by the mth scatterer, is the position of the mth scatterer, is the carrier frequency and represents the shift in phase of the scattered wave in the direction of the radar due to the relative radial velocity of the target with respect to the radar, while and are respectively the phase shift upon scattering and the transmitter phase, which can be assumed constants ( can depend on time for meteorological targets like vibrating water drops and tumbling ice particles).[6]

As already mentioned, a weather signal is a composite of echoes coming from a very large number of hydrometeors.[7] Such echoes are received continuously at the radar antenna after a delay equal to the time taken by the wave to reach the target and come back to the radar. Since individual echoes are impossible to be resolved individually, we sample the signal coming from the atmosphere at given discrete time delays .

Such defines the range of the scatterers that contribute mostly to the sample of the signal. The number of distinct resolution volumes in space from which the radar collects information is equal to the number of samples that are collected by the radar between any two radar pulses.[8] The expression of the sampled received voltage is:






For every range gate ( ) and for every pulse cycle ( ), the so-called I and Q voltages are derived taking the real and imaginary part of the complex voltage given in (3):[6] Their expressions are:











Therefore, after such sampling of the received signal, a time serie of I/Q signals is associated to every range gate.

As radar transmits coherent pulses with a certain pulse repetition frequency (PRF), the doppler processing technique is applied. A Power spectrum can be calculated from a sequence of components in the following way. In every range gate the FFT algorithm is applied to the serie of IQ signals, where is the number of FFT points used in the FFT. The result of the FFT is a complex spectrum where is the Doppler frequency. The power spectra is then easily estimated by






Such spectra is the distribution of radial velocities of the targets in the volume analyzed weighted with the power of the signal.[9]

The Doppler spectra[edit]

Sketch of a Doppler spectrum. The spectral power is represented as a function of the Doppler velocity . The parameters and denote the minimum and the maximum velocities, at which , and is the velocity resolution.

Usually numerous targets are present in the sample volume of the radar. Each of the individual targets produces a frequency shift according to its radial velocity. Measuring the returned power in any interval of the frequency shift allows the detection of the Doppler spectrum. This is illustrated in the Figure on the right, where a sketch of the Doppler spectrum is shown. The frequency is already converted into velocity in the x axis.

From the Doppler spectrum the reflectivity can be calculated using the expression:






The integral of the spectral power is called the 0-moment of the Doppler spectrum, which equals the reflectivity . Further, the first moment (8) and the second moment (9) of the Doppler spectrum can be calculated:











Sketch of the Doppler width. It shows the relation between the Doppler width , depicted by the arrows, and the number of modes of the droplet size distribution.

The first moment of the Doppler spectrum is the mean Doppler velocity . It corresponds to the mean radial velocity in the sampled volume.

The second moment is called the Doppler width . It corresponds to the variance of the Doppler spectrum. The Doppler width basically is a measure of the width of the spectrum of the detected velocities. It can also be a measure of the number of modes the targets size distribution has. A mono-modal distribution gives a small spectral width. A distribution that has several modes yields a lager spectral width, as illustrated in Figure 5. The spectral width is also influenced by turbulent motion of the targets in the sample volume: the spectral width increases with increasing turbulence.

The expressions to calculate the Kurtosis and the Skewness are coming out of mathematical statistics several formulations are used. Some of them can be found in the quoted literature in Kurtosis section.

Doppler velocity[edit]

Mean Doppler velocity can be seen as the mean frequency of a power spectrum (Doppler velocity) of the backscattered power.

Given the mean Doppler velocity (mean frequency of the power spectrum) of the measured volume along the line of sight - the radial velocity. For vertical measurements, the Doppler velocities is the sum of terminal velocity of particles, caused by gravity force, and air motions within the measured volume. Terminal velocity contains the information about microphysical properties of cloud particles. In order to obtain the terminal velocity from the cloud-radar observations, the influence of air motions that shift the spectrum have to be removed from the Doppler spectra, improving in this way the microphysics representativity. An approach to correct this shift is given by Kollias et al.,[10] improving the accuracy of the relation between the corrected Doppler velocity and the particle fall velocities.

Doppler width[edit]

The Doppler width, or Doppler spectrum width, is the standard deviation of the spectrum. Accordingly, small values stand for narrow spectra, while higher spectrum width corresponds to a bigger spreading of the hydrometeors over the velocity domain (frequency domain). Reasons for a higher width could be bi- or multiple-modal spectra. This means that the measured volume contains more than one hydrometeor population, which leads to two or more modes in the Doppler spectrum because of the different terminal velocities. A rapid change in Doppler width in combination with the mean Doppler velocity can also be used to separate two hydrometeor population.[11][12]

Since the air motion in the atmosphere affects the Doppler width, this parameter provides information about turbulence within the measured volume. Up- and downdrafts slow down the terminal fall velocities and can decrease or increase the Doppler width. If the measurements are not done pointing to the zenith, the horizontal wind component influences the width as well. The knowledge of the actual wind components in the atmosphere can be used to correct the Doppler spectrum, so that the retrieved microphysical parameters can be improved and the uncertainties decreased.[10]


The skewness parameter of the Doppler spectrum describes the asymmetry of the spectrum with respect to a symmetric Gaussian distribution.







This parameter relates the location of the spectrum peak in respect to the mean spectrum value. Therefore, a positive skewness value indicates that the peak is located to the left with respect to the mean. A negative skewed spectrum has its peak on the right side with respect to the spectrum mean. A value around zero indicates a symmetric spectrum. In this way, the shape of a Doppler gives information on changes of cloud microphysics or of dynamical changes within the measured volume. The higher the elevation of the radar is, the higher are the dynamical influences on this parameter. Because wind shears lead to a broadening of the Doppler spectrum width, they can lead to rapid changes in skewness as well. To be able to relate the change in skewness of the Doppler spectrum, the Doppler width should be cross-checked as well.

If the radar measurements are done vertically, the skewness of the Doppler spectrum gives information about measured cloud microphysics. The horizontal wind within the measured volumes cause only a shift of the whole spectrum within the Doppler domain. This means that the spectrum is shifted along the Doppler velocity axis but it did not influence the broadening of the spectra. So the changes in skewness give information about:[10]

  • if the minority of the hydrometeors is falling faster or slower as the mean Doppler velocity
  • if the Doppler spectrum is dominated by small hydrometeors (slower than the mean) or bigger particles (faster than the mean Doppler velocity)
  • the shape of the size distribution of the measured hydrometeors
  • changes over height or time can be related to a change in the cloud microphysics


The kurtosis of the Doppler spectrum is an asymmetry parameter too. It describes the steepness of the spectrum curve.







So it gives the peakedness (width of peak) of the given spectrum. Therefore, kurtosis can give information about the spectrum tail weight or lack of shoulders, helping to describe the spectrum shape better.

If a Doppler spectrum would be exactly normal distributed its kurtosis would be 3. If in general the kurtosis is positive the spectrum is called leptokurtic, or leptokurtotic. Most known distribution shapes would be those that follow a normal distributed spectra shape. It can be assumed that the Doppler spectrum is dominated by one single particle population that leads to a strong and narrow peak. If the spectrum has a negative kurtosis it is called platykurtic, or platykurtotic. The shape of such a spectrum has a has lower, wider peak around the mean and thinner tails. Examples of such shapes can be find in the kurtosis wiki entry.

The Doppler radar kurtosis analysis started quite recently, so there are still few scientific publications dealing with this parameter. An example can be find in Kollias et al.,[13] where kurtosis is used to interpret Doppler spectra and to understand the microphysical changes that it represents.

Polarimetric measurements in cloud radars[edit]

Polarimetric methods are considered to be a powerful tool in the remote sensing of the atmosphere, and particularly in radar observations of clouds and precipitation. Polarimetric techniques have been well developed for operational use in weather radar networks such as American NEXRAD and European OPERA,[14] and, currently, are being implemented in ground based and airborne[15] cloud radars. These techniques enable advanced clutter filtering, discrimination between meteorological and non-meteorological targets, and classification of atmospheric scatterers.[9] Another potential of polarimetric measurements of cloud radars is the estimation of ice crystals habit[16] that is one of the main problems in remote observations of mixed-phase clouds.[17] The assumed shape of ice crystals is considered to be the main source of errors in size and number concentration retrievals based on vertical combined lidar and radar observations.[18] Furthermore, in the existing numerical weather prediction models the assumed shape defines the depositional growth rate of ice particles and the area-mass-terminal velocity relations of ice crystals. Thus, ice habit can lead to significant uncertainties.[19]

A number of different polarimetric configurations were evaluated in theoretical and experimental studies[20][21][22] and are explained below.

Most of the existing pulse cloud radars operate in the LDR-mode.[9][23] In this mode, a radar transmits a horizontally polarized radiation and receives horizontal and vertical components of the scattered radiation in co-polarized and cross-polarized channels, respectively. The ratio of the power in the cross-polarized channel over the power in the co-polarized channel, named as linear depolarization ratio, is the polarimetric variable obtained by cloud radars of this type. Often cloud radars have two receiving units,[9] which allows simultaneous measurements of the orthogonal components of the received signal. Some cloud radars have only one receiving unit[23] and measure the orthogonal components consequently, with pulse-to-pulse switching of the receiving channel. Many of operational cloud radars with LDR-mode are pointed vertically[9][23] together with other remote sensing instruments in order to retrieve microphysical properties of cloud particles. LDR, measured by vertically pointed cloud radar, is used for the detection of the melting layer (also denominated as bright band) and clutter filtering.[9] The application of LDR-mode for the shape classification in scanning cloud radars is limited by its high sensitivity to the orientation of scatterers.[24]

Some cloud radars operate in the SLDR-mode, that is a modification of traditional LDR-mode.[16] In this mode the antenna system of the radar is rotated by 45°, i.e. the transmitted signal has +45° or -45° polarization. In contrast to LDR-mode, SLDR-mode is less sensitive to the particles orientation and, therefore, it is used in cloud radars for the classification of ice crystals. It should be noted that determination of ice crystals’ habit by ground based cloud radars requires elevation scanning and is based on analysis of the angular changes of the polarimetric variables. Evaluation of SLDR with in-situ observations showed the possibility to discriminate between rounded graupel, dendrite crystals, and aggregated ice particles.[16]

Polarization-agile cloud radars[25][26] use pulse-to-pulse switching between horizontal and vertical polarization state of the transmitted wave. In addition to LDR, such systems are able to measure differential reflectivity (ZDR) and correlation coefficient (ρHV). The combined analysis of LDR, ZDR, and ρHV can be used not only for classification of ice particle habit but also for characterization of their orientations.[27]

CDR-mode cloud radars transmit a circularly polarized wave and receive co-polarized and cross-polarized components.[28] The output polarimetric variable is the so-called circular depolarization ratio (CDR), and it is calculated as the ratio of cross-polarized power over the co-polarized power. In comparison with LDR, CDR is not affected by particles aligned in polarization plane,[24] e.g. insects or ice crystals in electrified atmospheric conditions.[29]

Measurement example[edit]

As the cloud radars sample the atmosphere, they measure the backscatter signal produced by different hydrometeor types (cloud droplets, drizzle, rain drops, ice particles, snow, etc.) and non-hydrometeorological targets. All these targets have different vertical velocities and shapes, and therefore the Doppler spectra and LDR can be used to distinguish between targets. In the figure below, an example of the MIRA-36 cloud radar measurements in Potenza is shown, where using the information given by the different parameters, an identification of targets can be done:

  • Liquid water clouds produce a signature in the reflectivity but not in the LDR, since the liquid droplets are almost spherical.
  • Ice clouds are characterized by relatively high LDR signals due to their irregular shapes.
  • Insects produce high LDR values and are usually within the Convective Boundary Layer (CBL), where up- and downdrafts are observed continuously.
  • The melting layer can be identified by an enhancement of the LDR, which is caused by irregular ice particles coated by liquid water during the phase transition.
  • Rain is characterized by high reflectivity values, high falling velocities and a broadening of the spectra.
  • Liquid layers within mixed-phase clouds can be detected by slightly higher peak width values, in accordance to the higher turbulence within.
Measurements performed by a MIRA-36 system in Tito Scalo, Potenza (Italy) on 2nd December 2014: (a) equivalent reflectivity, (b) Linear Depolarization Ratio, (c) Doppler velocity, where negative values indicate movement towards the radar, and (d) peak width.

Cloud radar systems[edit]

Cloud radar instruments involved in ACTRIS[30][31][32] and NOAA[33] projects.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) designed the Scanning ARM Cloud Radar (SACR) to monitor clouds overhead at various testing sites of the U.S. Department of Energy's atmospheric radiation measurement program. The radars operate continuously at these sites in Oklahoma, Alaska and the tropical western Pacific Ocean, and are designed to function for at least ten years with minimal manned attention. The SACR s operate at a frequency of 35 and 94 GHz, being designated as KaSACR and WSACR respectively.

Since the late 2000s, a meteorological 35.5 GHz Ka-band commercial cloud radar (MIRA-36) designed by METEK GmbH in collaboration with the Institute for Radio Astronomy, Kharkov (Ukraine) is in the market. Nowadays, there are eleven systems monitoring the cloud properties continuously in different sites, most of them in Europe. Cloudnet, a network of stations for the continuous evaluation of cloud and aerosol profiles in operational NWP models, assimilates their data, as well as data acquired by other instruments in the various sites with this purpose.

Outside of these networks, some research sites are also operating cloud radars. For example, at the Chilbolton Observatory (UK), two mm-wavelength radars are operating continuously at 3.2 and 9 mm for the study of insects migrations, while a 35 GHz cloud radar is operating in Cabauw (the Netherlands).

Table 2: Cloud radar systems involved in ACTRIS[30][31][32] and NOAA projects.[33][edit]

Location Band Frequency [GHz] Wavelength [mm] Type Location
ARM Mobile Facility 1 Ka 35 8.6 Ka-SACR Mobile
ARM Mobile Facility 1 W 94 3.2 W-SACR Mobile
ARM Mobile Facility 2 Ka 35 8.6 Ka-SACR Mobile
Chilbolton, UK Ka 35 9 Copernicus 51°8′40.53″N 1°26′19.60″W / 51.1445917°N 1.4387778°W / 51.1445917; -1.4387778
Chilbolton, UK W 94 3.2 Galileo 51°8′40.53″N 1°26′19.60″W / 51.1445917°N 1.4387778°W / 51.1445917; -1.4387778
Cleveland, Ohio, USA Ka 35.5 8.6 MIRA36 41°24′55.82″N 81°51′42.45″W / 41.4155056°N 81.8617917°W / 41.4155056; -81.8617917
Galway, Ireland Ka 35.5 8.6 MIRA36 53°16′42.79″N 9°3′37.86″W / 53.2785528°N 9.0605167°W / 53.2785528; -9.0605167
Hamburg, Germany Ka 35.5 8.6 MIRA36 53°33′56.40″N 9°58′30.27″E / 53.5656667°N 9.9750750°E / 53.5656667; 9.9750750
Iqaluit, Canada Ka 35.5 8.6 MIRA36 63°44′55″N 68°31′11″W / 63.74861°N 68.51972°W / 63.74861; -68.51972
Juelich, Germany Ka 35.5 8.6 MIRA36 50°54′19.02″N 6°24′17.38″E / 50.9052833°N 6.4048278°E / 50.9052833; 6.4048278
Kalsruhe, Germany Ka 35.5 8.6 MIRA36 49°0′42.91″N 8°25′1.13″E / 49.0119194°N 8.4169806°E / 49.0119194; 8.4169806
Leipzig, Germany Ka 35.5 8.6 MIRA36 51°21′8.19″N 12°26′2.90″E / 51.3522750°N 12.4341389°E / 51.3522750; 12.4341389
Lindenberg, Germany Ka 35.5 8.6 MIRA36 47°35′11.49″N 9°53′22.52″E / 47.5865250°N 9.8895889°E / 47.5865250; 9.8895889
Munich, Germany Ka 35.5 8.6 MIRA36 48°9′3.35″N 11°34′47.83″E / 48.1509306°N 11.5799528°E / 48.1509306; 11.5799528
North Slope of Alaska, Barrow, Alaska, USA Ka 35 8.6 Ka-SACR 71°19′23.73″N 156°36′56.70″W / 71.3232583°N 156.6157500°W / 71.3232583; -156.6157500
North Slope of Alaska, Barrow, Alaska, USA W 94 3.2 W-SACR 71°19′23.73″N 156°36′56.70″W / 71.3232583°N 156.6157500°W / 71.3232583; -156.6157500
Palaiseau, France W 95 3.16 BASTA 48°42′46.8″N 2°12′32.4″E / 48.713000°N 2.209000°E / 48.713000; 2.209000
Potenza, Italy Ka 35.5 8.6 MIRA36 40°36′15.93″N 15°43′12.03″E / 40.6044250°N 15.7200083°E / 40.6044250; 15.7200083
Sodankyla, Finland Ka 35.5 8.6 MIRA36 67°24′57.59″N 26°35′20.30″E / 67.4159972°N 26.5889722°E / 67.4159972; 26.5889722
Southern Great Plains, Oklahoma, USA Ka 35 8.6 Ka-SACR 36°36′18.0″N 97°29′6.0″W / 36.605000°N 97.485000°W / 36.605000; -97.485000
Southern Great Plains, Oklahoma, USA W 94 3.2 W-SACR 36°36′18.0″N 97°29′6.0″W / 36.605000°N 97.485000°W / 36.605000; -97.485000
Tropical Western Pacific-Darwin, Australia Ka 35 8.6 Ka-SACR 12°25′28.56″S 130°53′29.75″E / 12.4246000°S 130.8915972°E / -12.4246000; 130.8915972
Tropical Western Pacific-Manus, Papua New Guinea Ka 35 8.6 Ka-SACR 2°3′39.64″S 147°25′31.43″E / 2.0610111°S 147.4253972°E / -2.0610111; 147.4253972
Zugspitze, Germany Ka 35.5 8.6 MIRA36 47°25′16.00″N 10°59′7.00″E / 47.4211111°N 10.9852778°E / 47.4211111; 10.9852778

See also[edit]


  1. ^
  2. ^ Clothiaux, E.; Ackerman, T.; Mace, G.; Moran, K.; Marchand, R.; Miller, M.; Martner, B. (2000). "Objective determination of cloud heights and radar reflectivities using a combination of active remote sensors at the arm cart sites". J. Appl. Meteor. 39: 645–665. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<0645:ODOCHA>2.0.CO;2. 
  3. ^ Khandwalla, A.; Majurec, N.; Sekelsky, S.; Williams, C.; Gage, K. (2002). "Characterization of radar boundary layer data collected during the 2001 multi-frequency radar iop" (PDF). Proceedings of the 12th ARM Science Team Meeting. 
  4. ^ Marzano, F.; Barbieri, S.; Vulpiani, G.; Rose, W. (2006). "Volcanic cloud retrieval by ground-based microwave weather radar" (PDF). IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. 44 (11): 3235–3246. doi:10.1109/tgrs.2006.879116. [permanent dead link]
  5. ^ Madonna, F.; Amodeo, A.; D'Amico, G.; Pappalardo, G. (2013). "A study on the use of radar and lidar for characterizing ultragiant aerosol". Geophys. Res. 118. doi:10.1002/jgrd.50789. 
  6. ^ a b c d e Clothiaux, E .E.; Ackerman, T. P.; Babb, D. M. (1996). Ground-based remote sensing of cloud properties using millimeter-wave radar. In: Radiation and Water in the Climate System. Springer. pp. 323–366. ISBN 978-3-662-03289-3. 
  7. ^ Doviak, R. J.; Zrnic, D. S. (1993). Doppler Radar & Weather Observations. Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-221420-X. 
  8. ^ Doviak, R. J.; Zrnic, D. S.; Sirmans, D. S. (1979). "Doppler weather radar". Proceedings of the IEEE. 67 (11): 1522–1553. doi:10.1109/PROC.1979.11511. 
  9. ^ a b c d e f Görsdorf, U.; Lehmann, V.; Bauer-Pfundstein, M.; Peters, G.; Vavriv, D.; Vinogradov, V.; Volkov, V. (2015). "A 35 ghz polarimetric doppler radar for long term observations of cloud parameters-description of system and data processing". Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. 32: 675–690. doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00066.1. 
  10. ^ a b c Kollias, P.; Szyrmer, W.; Rémillard, J.; Luke, E. (2011). "Cloud radar doppler spectra in drizzling stratiform clouds: 2. observations and microphysical modeling of drizzle evolution". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 116 (13). doi:10.1029/2010JD015238. 
  11. ^ Shupe, M. D.; Kollias, P.; Matrosov, S. Y.; Schneider, T. L. (2004). "Deriving mixed-phase cloud properties from doppler radar spectra". Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. 21 (4): 660–670. doi:10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<0660:dmcpfd>;2. 
  12. ^ Shupe, M. D.; Uttal, T.; Matrosov, S. Y. (2005). "Arctic cloud microphysics retrievals from surface-based remote sensors at sheba". Journal of Applied Meteorology. 44 (10): 1544–1562. doi:10.1175/JAM2297.1. 
  13. ^ a b c Kollias, P.; Rémillard, J.; Luke, E.; Szyrmer, W. (2011). "Cloud radar doppler spectra in drizzling stratiform clouds: 1. forward modeling and remote sensing applications". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 116 (D13). doi:10.1029/2010JD015237. 
  14. ^ Huuskonen, A.; Saltikoff, E.; Holleman, I. (2013). "The operational weather radar network in europe". Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 95: 897–907. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00216.1. 
  15. ^ Mech, M.; Orlandi, E.; Crewell, S.; Ament, F.; Hirsch, L.; Hagen, M.; Peters, G.; Stevens, B. (2014). "HAMP: the microwave package on the High Altitude and LOng range research aircraft (HALO)". Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 7 (12): 4539– 4553. doi:10.5194/amt-7-4539-2014. 
  16. ^ a b c Matrosov, S. Y.; Mace, G. G.; Merchand, R.; Shupe, M. D.; Hallar, A. G.; McCubbin, I. B. (2012). "Observations of ice crystal habits with a scanning polarimetric wband radar at slant linear depolarization ratio mode". J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 29: 989–1008. doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00131.1. 
  17. ^ Shupe, M. D.; Daniel, J. S.; de Boer, G.; Eloranta, E. W.; Kollias, P.; Long, C. N.; Luke, E. P.; Turner, D. D.; Verlinde, J. (2008). "A focus on mixed-phase clouds". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 89: 383–405. doi:10.1002/met.289. 
  18. ^ de Boer, Gijs; Eloranta, Edwin W.; Shupe, Matthew D. (2009). "Arctic Mixed-Phase Stratiform Cloud Properties from Multiple Years of Surface-Based Measurements at Two High-Latitude Locations". Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 66 (9): 2874–2887. doi:10.1175/2009JAS3029.1. 
  19. ^ Bouniol, Dominique; Protat, Alain; Delanoë, Julien; Pelon, Jacques; Piriou, Jean-Marcel; Bouyssel, François; Tompkins, Adrian M.; Wilson, Damian R.; Morille, Yohann; Haeffelin, Martial; O’Connor, Ewan J.; Hogan, Robin J.; Illingworth, Anthony J.; Donovan, David P.; Baltink, Henk-Klein (2010). "Using Continuous Ground-Based Radar and Lidar Measurements for Evaluating the Representation of Clouds in Four Operational Models". Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. 49 (9): 1971–1991. doi:10.1175/2010JAMC2333.1. 
  20. ^ Matrosov, S. Y. (July 1991). "Prospects for the measurement of ice cloud particle shape and orientation with elliptically polarized radar signals". Radio Science. 26 (4): 847–856. doi:10.1029/91RS00965. 
  21. ^ Matrosov, S. Y.; Kropfli, R. A. (October 1993). "Cirrus Cloud Studies with Elliptically Polarized Ka-band Radar Signals: A Suggested Approach". Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. 10 (5): 684–692. doi:10.1175/1520-0426(1993)010<0684:CCSWEP>2.0.CO;2. 
  22. ^ Reinking, Roger F.; Matrosov, Sergey Y.; Kropfli, Robert A.; Bartram, Bruce W. (March 2002). "Evaluation of a 45° Slant Quasi-Linear Radar Polarization State for Distinguishing Drizzle Droplets, Pristine Ice Crystals, and Less Regular Ice Particles". Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. 19 (3): 296–321. doi:10.1175/1520-0426-19.3.296. 
  23. ^ a b c Bharadwaj, Nitin; Nelson, Dan; Lindenmaier, Iosif; Johnson, Karen. "Instrument : Ka ARM Zenith Radar (KAZR)". ARM Climate Research Facility. Retrieved 29 May 2015. 
  24. ^ a b Matrosov, Sergey Y. (1991). "Theoretical Study of Radar Polarization Parameters Obtained from Cirrus Clouds". Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 48 (8): 1062–1070. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<1062:TSORPP>2.0.CO;2. 
  25. ^ Pazmany, A.; McIntosh, R.; Kelly, R.; Vali, G. (1994). "An airborne 95 ghz dual-polarized radar for cloud studies". IEEE Trans. on Geosci. Rem. Sens. 32: 731–739. doi:10.1109/36.298002. 
  26. ^ Galloway, J.; Pazmany, A.; Mead, J.; McIntosh, R. E.; Leon, D.; French, J.; Kelly, R.; Vali, G. (February 1997). "Detection of Ice Hydrometeor Alignment Using an Airborne W-band Polarimetric Radar". Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. 14 (1): 3–12. doi:10.1175/1520-0426(1997)014<0003:DOIHAU>2.0.CO;2. 
  27. ^ Ryzhkov, A. V. (2001). "Interpretation of polarimetric radar covariance matrix for meteorological scatterers: Theoretical analysis". Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. 18: 315–328. doi:10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<0315:ioprcm>;2. 
  28. ^ Martner, B. E.; Moran, K. P. (2001). "Using cloud radar polarization measurements to evaluate stratus cloud and insect echoes". Journal of Geophysical Research. 106: 4891– 4897. doi:10.1029/2000jd900623. 
  29. ^ Galletti, M.; Huang, D.; Kollias, P. (2014). "Zenith/nadir pointing mm-wave radars: Linear or circular polarization?". IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 52: 628–639. doi:10.1109/tgrs.2013.2243155. 
  30. ^ a b
  31. ^ a b
  32. ^ a b
  33. ^ a b

External links[edit]