# Minimal surface

(Redirected from Minimal surfaces)
A helicoid minimal surface formed by a soap film on a helical frame

In mathematics, a minimal surface is a surface that locally minimizes its area. This is equivalent to (see definitions below) having a mean curvature of zero.

The term "minimal surface" is used because these surfaces originally arose as surfaces that minimized total surface area subject to some constraint. Physical models of area-minimizing minimal surfaces can be made by dipping a wire frame into a soap solution, forming a soap film, which is a minimal surface whose boundary is the wire frame. However the term is used for more general surfaces that may self-intersect or do not have constraints. For a given constraint there may also exist several minimal surfaces with different areas (for example, see minimal surface of revolution): the standard definitions only relate to a local optimum, not a global optimum.

## Definitions

Saddle tower minimal surface. While any small change of the surface increases its area, there exist other surfaces with the same boundary with smaller total area.

Minimal surfaces can be defined in several equivalent ways in R3. The fact that they are equivalent serves to demonstrate how minimal surface theory lies at the crossroads of several mathematical disciplines, especially differential geometry, calculus of variations, potential theory, complex analysis and mathematical physics.[1]

Local least area definition: A surface MR3 is minimal if and only if every point pM has a neighbourhood with least-area relative to its boundary.

Note that this property is local: there might exist other surfaces that minimize area better with the same global boundary.

Variational definition: A surface MR3 is minimal if and only if it is a critical point of the area functional for all compactly supported variations.

This definition makes minimal surfaces a 2-dimensional analogue to geodesics.

Soap film definition: A surface MR3 is minimal if and only if every point pM has a neighbourhood Dp which is equal to the unique idealized soap film with boundary ∂Dp

By the Young–Laplace equation the curvature of a soap film is proportional to the difference in pressure between the sides: if it is zero, the membrane has zero mean curvature. Note that spherical bubbles are not minimal surfaces as per this definition: while they minimize total area subject to a constraint on internal volume, they have a positive pressure.

Minimal surface curvature planes. On a minimal surface the curvature along the principal curvature planes are equal and opposite at every point. This makes the mean curvature zero.
Mean curvature definition: A surface MR3 is minimal if and only if its mean curvature vanishes identically.

A direct implication of this definition is that every point on the surface is a saddle point with equal and opposite principal curvatures.

Differential equation definition: A surface MR3 is minimal if and only if it can be locally expressed as the graph of a solution of
${\displaystyle (1+u_{x}^{2})u_{yy}-2u_{x}u_{y}u_{xy}+(1+u_{y}^{2})u_{xx}=0}$

The partial differential equation in this definition was originally found in 1762 by Lagrange,[2] and Jean Baptiste Meusnier discovered in 1776 that it implied a vanishing mean curvature.[3]

Energy definition: A conformal immersion X: MR3 is minimal if and only if it is a critical point of the Dirichlet energy for all compactly supported variations, or equivalently if any point pM has a neighbourhood with least energy relative to its boundary.

This definition ties minimal surfaces to harmonic functions and potential theory.

Harmonic definition: If X = (x1, x2, x3): MR3 is an isometric immersion of a Riemann surface into 3-space, then X is said to be minimal whenever xi is a harmonic function on M for each i.

A direct implication of this definition and the maximum principle for harmonic functions is that there are no compact complete minimal surfaces in R3.

Gauss map definition: A surface MR3 is minimal if and only if its stereographically projected Gauss map g: MC ∪ {∞} is meromorphic with respect to the underlying Riemann surface structure, and M is not a piece of a sphere.

This definition uses that the mean curvature is half of the trace of the shape operator, which is linked to the derivatives of the Gauss map. If the projected Gauss map obeys the Cauchy–Riemann equations then either the trace vanishes or every point of M is umbilic, in which case it is a piece of a sphere.

Mean curvature flow definition: Minimal surfaces are the critical points for the mean curvature flow.[4]

The local least area and variational definitions allow extending minimal surfaces to other Riemannian manifolds than R3.

## History

Minimal surface theory originates with Lagrange who in 1762 considered the variational problem of finding the surface z = z(x, y) of least area stretched across a given closed contour. He derived the Euler–Lagrange equation for the solution

${\displaystyle {\frac {d}{dx}}\left({\frac {z_{x}}{\sqrt {1+z_{x}^{2}+z_{y}^{2}}}}\right)+{\frac {d}{dy}}\left({\frac {z_{y}}{\sqrt {1+z_{x}^{2}+z_{y}^{2}}}}\right)=0}$

He did not succeed in finding any solution beyond the plane. In 1776 Jean Baptiste Marie Meusnier discovered that the helicoid and catenoid satisfy the equation, and that the differential expression corresponds to twice the mean curvature of the surface, concluding that surfaces with zero mean curvature are area-minimizing.

By expanding Lagrange's equation to

${\displaystyle (1+z_{x}^{2})z_{yy}-2z_{x}z_{y}z_{xy}+(1+z_{y}^{2})z_{xx}=0}$

Gaspard Monge and Legendre in 1795 derived representation formulas for the solution surfaces. While these were successfully used by Heinrich Scherk in 1830 to derive his surfaces, they were generally regarded as practically unusable. Catalan proved in 1842/43 that the helicoid is the only ruled minimal surface.

Progress had been fairly slow until the middle of the century, when the Björling problem was solved using complex methods. The "first golden age" of minimal surfaces began. Schwarz found the solution of the Plateau problem for a regular quadrilateral in 1865 and for a general quadrilateral in 1867 (allowing the construction of his periodic surface families) using complex methods. Weierstrass and Enneper developed more useful representation formulas, firmly linking minimal surfaces to complex analysis and harmonic functions. Other important contributions came from Beltrami, Bonnet, Darboux, Lie, Riemann, Serret and Weingarten.

Between 1925 and 1950 minimal surface theory revived, now mainly aimed at nonparametric minimal surfaces. The complete solution of the Plateau problem by Jesse Douglas and Tibor Radó was a major milestone. Bernstein's problem and Robert Osserman's work on complete minimal surfaces of finite total curvature were also important.

Another revival began in the 1980s. One cause was the discovery in 1982 by Celso Costa of a surface that disproved the conjecture that the plane, the catenoid, and the helicoid are the only complete embedded minimal surfaces in R3 of finite topological type. This not only stimulated new work on using the old parametric methods, but also demonstrated the importance of computer graphics to visualise the studied surfaces and numerical methods to solve the "period problem" (when using the conjugate surface method to determine surface patches that can be assembled into a larger symmetric surface, certain parameters need to be numerically matched to produce an embedded surface). Another cause was the verification by H. Karcher that the triply periodic minimal surfaces originally described empirically by Alan Schoen in 1970 actually exist. This has led to a rich menagerie of surface families and methods of deriving new surfaces from old, for example by adding handles or distorting them.

Currently the theory of minimal surfaces has diversified to minimal submanifolds in other ambient geometries, becoming relevant to mathematical physics (e.g. the positive mass conjecture, the Penrose conjecture) and three-manifold geometry (e.g. the Smith conjecture, the Poincaré conjecture, the Thurston Geometrization Conjecture).

## Examples

Classical examples of minimal surfaces include:

• the plane, which is a trivial case
• catenoids: minimal surfaces made by rotating a catenary once around its directrix
• helicoids: A surface swept out by a line rotating with uniform velocity around an axis perpendicular to the line and simultaneously moving along the axis with uniform velocity

Surfaces from the 19th century golden age include:

Modern surfaces include:

## Generalisations and links to other fields

Minimal surfaces can be defined in other manifolds than R3, such as hyperbolic space, higher-dimensional spaces or Riemannian manifolds.

The definition of minimal surfaces can be generalized/extended to cover constant-mean-curvature surfaces: surfaces with a constant mean curvature, which need not equal zero.

In discrete differential geometry discrete minimal surfaces are studied: simplicial complexes of triangles that minimize their area under small perturbations of their vertex positions.[5] Such discretizations are often used to approximate minimal surfaces numerically, even if no closed form expressions are known.

Brownian motion on a minimal surface leads to probabilistic proofs of several theorems on minimal surfaces.[6]

Minimal surfaces have become an area of intense scientific study, especially in the areas of molecular engineering and materials science, due to their anticipated applications in self-assembly of complex materials.

Minimal surfaces play a role in general relativity. The apparent horizon (marginally outer trapped surface) is a minimal hypersurface, linking the theory of black holes to minimal surfaces and the Plateau problem.[7][8]

Minimal surfaces are part of the generative design toolbox used by modern designers. In architecture there has been much interest in tensile structures, which are closely related to minimal surfaces. A famous example is the Olympiapark in Münich by Frei Otto, inspired by soap surfaces.

In the art world, minimal surfaces have been extensively explored in the sculpture of Robert Engman (1927– ), Robert Longhurst (1949– ), and Charles O. Perry (1929–2011), among others.