Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises
Emblem of India.svg
Ministry overview
Ministry executives
  • Anant Geete, Minister of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises[1]
  • Babul Supriyo, Minister of State for Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises
Websitedhi.nic.in

The Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises is a executive agency of the Government of India that administers 48 central public sector enterprises (PSEs) and assists them in their effort to improve capacity utilization and increase profitability, generate resources and re-orient strategies to become more competitive. The ministry serves as an interface between PSEs and other agencies for long-term policy formulation. The ministry also encourages the restructuring of PSEs to make their operations competitive and viable on a long-term and sustainable basis.

As of July 2016, the Honorable Minister is Anant Geete,[2] and the Honorable Minister of State is Babul Supriyo.

Public sector enterprises[edit]

As of 2017, the ministry is responsible for the following public sector enterprises:[3]

Andrew Yule and Company Ltd. andrewyule.com
Bharat Bhari Udyog Nigam (BBUNL) bbunl.com
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL) bhel.com
Bharat Pumps & Compressors bharatpumps.co.in
Bridge and Roof Company (India) bridgeroof.co.in
Cement Corporation of India (CCI) cementcorporation.co.in
Engineering Projects (India) engineeringprojects.com
Heavy Engineering Corporation (HEC) hecltd.com
Hindustan Newsprint Ltd. (HNL) hnlonline.com
Hindustan Paper Corporation hindpaper.in
Hindustan Salts Ltd. (HSL) indiasalt.com
Instrumentation Limited, Kota (ILK) ilkota.in
Nagaland Pulp & Paper Co. (NPPC) nppc.in
NEPA (India) nepamills.co.in
Richardson & Cruddas (R&C) richardsononcruddas.com
Scooters India Ltd. (SIL) scootersindia.com

Department of Public Enterprises[edit]

The Department of Public Enterprises acts as a nodal agency for all Public Sector Enterprises and assists in policy formulation pertaining to the role of PSEs in the economy by laying down policy guidelines on performance improvement and evaluation, financial accounting, personnel management and in related areas. It also collects, evaluates, and maintains information on several areas in respect of PSEs. The Department has five constituent Divisions, viz; the Financial Policy Division, the Management Policy Division, the MOU Division, the Administration & Coordination Division and Permanent Machinery of Arbitration.

Role of DPE in issuing guidelines / directives to CPSEs[edit]

The role of DPE in issuing guidelines/directives is clearly defined in Report no.-2 of 2013[4] of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India[5] on Compliance Audit of General Purpose Financial Reports of central public sector enterprises.

The directions/instructions are given to CPSEs through presidential directives as well as guidelines issued by administrative ministries or DPE.

Presidential directives are issued by the administrative ministries to the concerned CPSEs whenever the situation warrants and are mandatory. For the purpose of maintaining uniformity, such Directives are to be issued in consultation with the DPE if these relate to single CPSE and with the concurrence of the DPE if these are applicable to more than one CPSE.

Guidelines[6] can be issued either by the Administrative Ministries or the DPE case-by-case and are advisory in nature. The Board of Directors of the CPSEs has the discretion not to adopt these guidelines for reasons to be recorded in writing. The Board Resolution on the subject giving the reasons therein is to be forwarded both to the Administrative Ministry concerned as well as to the DPE.

In the above-mentioned report no-2 of 2013 it is also mentioned that though the DPE guidelines are advisory. For good corporate governance, there should be an appropriate mechanism to enforce accountability of the Administrative Ministries and CPSEs to the compliance to DPE guidelines. An Audit review of the institutional arrangement DPE has in place to ensure compliance with its guidelines revealed that:

  • DPE did not maintain the database as to which CPSE's boards adopted its guidelines.
  • DPE did not have a mechanism to ensure compliance with all its guidelines.
  • DPE did not write to CPSEs for recovery of irregular payments pointed out by an audit.

DPE guidelines on personnel policies[edit]

Different categories of guidelines on personnel policies[7] are: (a) Creation Of Posts And Categorization (b) Composition Of Board Of Directors (c) Service Matters (d) Immediate Absorption-Deputation (e) Annual Performance Appraisal (f) Conduct, Discipline & Appeal Rules (g) Vigilance Policies (h) Reservation Policies (i) Report Of The Committee To Review The Format Of Annual Performance Report (APR) And Procedure For Writing APR

Salient feature DPE Guidelines on Annual Performance Appraisal[edit]

Format - Weightage of Personal Attributes (Competencies, Values, and Potentials) are to be rationalized to 25% for all executives including the chief executive. Balance 75% for MOU/Targets. This is as per "Report Of The Committee To Review The Format Of Annual Performance Report (APR) And Procedure For Writing APR"

Timely completion - Performance Appraisal Process has to be completed before distribution of Performance Related Pay(PRP) as per DPE OM no 2(68) /11-DPE(WC) dated 31.12.2012.

Appeal - representations can be made against the adverse entries in Performance Appraisal Report. Any deviation of Performance Appraisal score can be appealed. Reference: DPE OM No. 5(1)/2000-GM Dated the 28.05.2009 and Supreme Court of India, Dev Dutt vs Union Of India & Ors on 12.05. 2008

Last date of appeal - Last date of appeal has to be mentioned in the Final PMS scorecard while communicating the score by reporting officer.

Time limit of Appeal - 6 weeks to appeal and 6 weeks to be readdressed.

Disposal of representation against APAR score in a Quasi-judicial Manner[edit]

As per DOPT (Department of Personnel & Training), OM No. 21011/1/2005-Estt.(A)(Part.III) dated 31.01.2014

The representations against the remarks or for up gradation of final grading in the APAR (Annual Performance Appraisal Reports) be considered by the competent authority objectively in a quasi-judicial manner on the basis of material placed before it. It provides that the competent authority shall take into account the contentions of the officer who has represented against the particular remarks/ grading in the APAR and also take the views from the reporting and reviewing officer.

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Department of Heavy Industry, Ministry of Heavy Industries & Public Enterprises, Government of India". dhi.nic.in.
  2. ^ "List of Council of ministers in Modi Cabinet". 27 May 2014 – via www.thehindu.com.
  3. ^ "Links to the websites of Central Public Sector Enterprises under Department of Heavy Industry". Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises. Archived from the original on 21 May 2012. Retrieved 3 May 2012.
  4. ^ Report no.-2 of 2013[permanent dead link]
  5. ^ Comptroller and Auditor General of India
  6. ^ Guidelines
  7. ^ [1]

External links[edit]