Minoritized language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In sociolinguistics, a minoritized language is a language that is marginalized, persecuted or banned.[1] Language minoritization stems from the desire of large nations to establish a common language for commerce and government, or to establish homogeneity for ideological reasons.[2][3] Minoritized languages are typically restricted to a smaller range of domains than dominant languages, and frequently one-way bilingualism develops when speakers of minoritized languages learn the dominant language, but not vice versa. Speakers of minoritized languages face various consequences, including reduced educational achievement and language shift in favor of the dominant language.

Minority vs. minoritized[edit]

A minoritized language differs from a minority language, which means a language used by a small number of speakers,[1] or alternately to a language with lesser numerical or political power in a given context.[3] There are cases in which a language is minoritized while being spoken by a majority of the population, such as some indigenous languages during the colonization of Africa, when colonial languages were favored.[4] Spanish is minoritized in the United States but the dominant language in Latin America, where indigenous languages are minoritized.[5][6] The term "minoritized" is sometimes used in preference to "minority" because it draws attention to the power differential between languages.[3]

"Western language ideology"[edit]

Nancy Dorian, Kathryn A. Davis, and Prem Phyak have argued that there is a "Western language ideology" which applies social Darwinism to linguistics. This ideology allegedly idealizes monolingualism, denies the benefits of multilingualism, and disdains non-standard language varieties. Because such non-standard varieties are labeled deficient, a hierarchy of languages is created.[a] Some authors have drawn a connection between anti-immigration sentiment, especially anti-German sentiment, and English-only education in the US.[10]

In Europe, the process of minoritization, for example of the Celtic languages in Britain and minority languages in France, was connected to the emergence of nationalist movements calling for the establishment of monolingual, monocultural nation-states in the nineteenth century. The process of minoritization then led to language shift towards English and French.[11]

Characteristics of minoritization[edit]

The defining characteristic of minoritization is the existence of a power imbalance between it and the dominant language. One sign that a language is minoritized is if its speakers develop one-way bilingualism—they learn the dominant language, but speakers of the dominant language do not learn the minoritized language. Another frequent symptom of minoritization is the restriction of the language to a limited range of domains. A language excluded from use in government and formal education might only be used at home and social situations. Because of the above, speakers of the minoritized language became a subset of speakers of the dominant language;[12] for instance, all speakers of Scottish Gaelic are also speakers of English, but most English speakers in Scotland do not speak Gaelic.[13] In contrast, speakers of a dominant language can carry out all functions of daily life using their native language.[12]

Speakers of the dominant language typically use the greater prestige of the dominant language to prevent speakers of the minoritized language from changing the situation to one more favorable to the minoritized language. They use "amnesia" and "normalization" to confuse the reality with what should be, and therefore legitimize the situation in which some languages are minoritized. For example, many "liberal" criticisms of language planning for minoritized language communities assert that intervention in favor of minoritized languages is equivalent to the policies that caused the language to become minoritized in the first place, such as linguistic legislation, elitism, exclusion of minoritized languages from formal education, and even forced population transfer.[12]

Consequences[edit]

In Engaged Language Policy and Practices, the authors cite three studies that have shown that students' academic achievement suffers if policies are implemented that minoritize their native language. Nancy Dorian has argued that the "Western language ideology" favoring monolingualism has fostered an "ideology of contempt" for minoritized languages.[10] The process of minoritization can lead to language shift in favor of the dominant language.[11]

Examples[edit]

  • In Spain, minority languages such as Catalan, Galician, and Basque were persecuted during the dictatorship of Francisco Franco, due to a desire to eradicate them. The persecution was somewhat counterproductive, because it actually raised their prestige in Catalonia, Galicia, and the Basque country respectively.[14]
  • In Russia, speakers of Ös and Tofa, were, respectively, ridiculed for or banned from speaking the language.[15]
  • The Guarani language of Paraguay, although spoken by a majority of nationals, is seen as a clear example of minoritized language, due to the socioeconomic and political prevalence of Spanish. Organisations such as Yvy Marãe'ỹ are advocating against this trend.[16]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ The prevailing view among contemporary linguists is that regardless of perceptions that a dialect or language is "better" or "worse" than its counterparts, when dialects and languages are assessed "on purely linguistic grounds, all languages—and all dialects—have equal merit".[7][8][9]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Planificación lingüística de la lengua de los signos español (LSE). Pág 63
  2. ^ Hornsby, Michael (2012). "The End of Minority Languages? Europe's Regional Languages in Perspective" (PDF). Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe. 11: 88–116 – via ECMI.
  3. ^ a b c Spolsky, Bernard; Hult, Francis M. (2010). The Handbook of Educational Linguistics. John Wiley & Sons. p. 266. ISBN 9781444331042.
  4. ^ Anna Aguilar-Amat Castillo, Mohammed Pathé Sidibé, Joan Vilarnau Dalmaula. Terminología del parentesco en lengua fulfulde: un intento de sistematización. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.
  5. ^

    La utilización del español como instrumento habitual de comunicación y, por tanto, su importancia social, dependen en gran medida del uso que de esta lengua haga la población hispana y, en este sentido, se observa un desplazamiento masivo hacia el inglés a partir del establecimiento permanente en los Estados Unidos.

  6. ^ "Indigenous Languages of South America". aboutworldlanguages.com. Retrieved 23 August 2018.
  7. ^ Fox, Margalit (12 September 1999). "The Way We Live Now: 9-12-99: On Language; Dialects". The New York Times. Retrieved 23 March 2009.
  8. ^ O'Grady, William; Archibald, John; Aronoff, Mark; Rees-Miller, Janie (2001). Contemporary Linguistics. Boston: Bedford St. Martin's. p. 7. ISBN 9780312247386.
  9. ^ Fasold, Ralph W.; Connor-Linton, Jeff (2006). An Introduction to Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 387. ISBN 978-0-521-84768-1.
  10. ^ a b Davis, Kathryn A.; Phyak, Prem (2016). Engaged Language Policy and Practices. Taylor & Francis. p. 19. ISBN 9781317442493.
  11. ^ a b Hinton, Leanne; Huss, Leena; Roche, Gerald (2018). The Routledge Handbook of Language Revitalization. Routledge. ISBN 9781317200857.
  12. ^ a b c Calaforra, Guillem. "Lengua y poder en las situaciones de minorización lingüística" (PDF) (in Spanish). Universidad Jagellónica (Cracovia).
  13. ^ MacAulay, Donald (1992). The Celtic Languages. Cambridge University Press. p. 141. ISBN 978-0521231275.
  14. ^ Lozano, Irene (28 November 2005). "Lenguas en guerra" [Languages in War] (in Spanish). Aulaintercultural. Archived from the original on 12 October 2008. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
  15. ^ Harrison, David K. (2008). When Languages Die. Oxford University Press. pp. 20–21. ISBN 978-0195372069.
  16. ^ "International Seminar on Translation, Terminology and Minoritized Languages" (PDF). Municipality of San Lorenzo, Paraguay. 30 May 2018.(in Spanish)