Molten carbonate fuel cell
|This article or section may have been copied and pasted from http://energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/types-fuel-cells#molten ( · ), possibly in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please remedy this by editing this article to remove any non-free copyrighted content and attributing free content correctly, or flagging the content for deletion. Please be sure that the supposed source of the copyright violation is not itself a Wikipedia mirror. (December 2014)|
Molten carbonate fuel cells (MCFCs) are currently being developed for natural gas, biogas (produced as a result of anaerobic digestion or biomass gasification), and coal-based power plants for electrical utility, industrial, and military applications. MCFCs are high-temperature fuel cells that use an electrolyte composed of a molten carbonate salt mixture suspended in a porous, chemically inert ceramic matrix of beta-alumina solid electrolyte (BASE). Since they operate at extremely high temperatures of 650 °C (roughly 1,200 °F) and above, non-precious[dubious ] metals can be used as catalysts at the anode and cathode, reducing costs.
Improved efficiency is another reason MCFCs offer significant cost reductions over phosphoric acid fuel cells (PAFCs). Molten carbonate fuel cells can reach efficiencies approaching 60%, considerably higher than the 37–42% efficiencies of a phosphoric acid fuel cell plant. When the waste heat is captured and used, overall fuel efficiencies can be as high as 85%.
Unlike alkaline, phosphoric acid, and polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells, MCFCs don't require an external reformer to convert more energy-dense fuels to hydrogen. Due to the high temperatures at which MCFCs operate, these fuels are converted to hydrogen within the fuel cell itself by a process called internal reforming, which also reduces cost.
Molten carbonate fuel cells are not prone to poisoning by carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide — they can even use carbon oxides as fuel — making them more attractive for fueling with gases made from coal. Because they are more resistant to impurities than other fuel cell types, scientists believe that they could even be capable of internal reforming of coal, assuming they can be made resistant to impurities such as sulfur and particulates that result from converting coal, a dirtier fossil fuel source than many others, into hydrogen. Alternatively, because MCFCs require CO2 be delivered to the cathode along with the oxidizer, they can be used to electrochemically separate carbon dioxide from the flue gas of other fossil fuel power plants for sequestration.
The primary disadvantage of current MCFC technology is durability. The high temperatures at which these cells operate and the corrosive electrolyte used accelerate component breakdown and corrosion, decreasing cell life. Scientists are currently exploring corrosion-resistant materials for components as well as fuel cell designs that increase cell life without decreasing performance.
Molten carbonate FC's are a recently developed type of fuel cell that targets small and large energy distribution/generation systems since their power production is in the 0.3-300 MW range. The operating pressure is between 1-8 atm while the temperatures are between 600-700 oC. Due to the production of CO2 during reforming of the fossil fuel (methane, natural gas), MCFC’s are not a completely green technology, but are promising due to their reliability and efficiency (sufficient heat for co-generation with electricity). Current MCFC efficiencies range from 60-70%.
Due to the high operating temperatures of MCFC’s, the materials need to be very carefully selected to survive the conditions present within the cell. The following sections cover the various materials present in the fuel cell and recent developments in research.
The anode material typically consists of a porous (3-6 μm, 45-70% material porosity) Ni based alloy. Ni is alloyed with either Chromium or Aluminum in the 2-10% range. These alloying elements allow for formation of LiCrO2/LiAlO2 at the grain boundaries, which increases the materials' creep resistance and prevents sintering of the anode at the high operating temperatures of the fuel cell. Recent research has looked at using nano Ni and other Ni alloys to increase the performance and decrease the operating temperature of the fuel cell. A reduction in operating temperature would extend the lifetime of the fuel cell (i.e. decrease corrosion rate) and allow for use of cheaper component materials. At the same time, a decrease in temperature would decrease ionic conductivity of the electrolyte and thus, the anode materials need to compensate for this performance decline (e.g. by increasing power density). Other researchers have looked into enhancing creep resistance by using a Ni3Al alloy anode to reduce mass transport of Ni in the anode when in operation.
On the other side of the cell, the cathode material is composed of a porous Ni that is converted to a lithiated nickel oxide (lithium is intercalated within the NiO crystal structure). The pore size within the cathode is in the range of 7-15 μm with 60-70% of the material being porous. The primary issue with the cathode material is dissolution of NiO since it reacts with CO2 when the cathode is in contact with the carbonate electrolyte. This dissolution leads to precipitation of Ni metal in the electrolyte and since it is electrically conductive, the fuel cell can get short circuited. Therefore, current studies have looked into the addition of MgO to the NiO cathode to limit this dissolution. Magnesium oxide serves to reduce the solubility of Ni2+ in the cathode and decreases precipitation in the electrolyte. Alternatively, replacement of the conventional cathode material with a LiFeO2-LiCoO2-NiO alloy has shown promising performance results and almost completely avoids the problem of Ni dissolution of the cathode.
MCFC’s use a liquid electrolyte (molten carbonate) which consists of a sodium(Na) and potassium(K) carbonate. This electrolyte is supported by a ceramic (LiAlO2) matrix to contain the liquid between the electrodes. The high temperatures of the fuel cell is required to produce sufficient ionic conductivity of oxygen through this electrolyte. Common MCFC electrolytes contain 62% Li2CO3 and 38% K2CO3. A greater fraction of Li carbonate is used due to its higher ionic conductivity but is limited to 62% due to its lower gas solubility and ionic diffusivity of oxygen. In addition, Li2CO3 is a very corrosive electrolyte and this ratio of carbonates provides the lowest corrosion rate. Due to these issues, recent studies have delved into replacing the potassium carbonate with a sodium carbonate. A Li/Na electrolyte has shown to have better performance (higher conductivity) and improves the stability of the cathode when compared to a Li/K electrolyte (Li/K is more basic). In addition, scientists have also looked into modifying the matrix of the electrolyte to prevent issues such as phase changes (γ-LiAlO2 to α-LiAlO2) in the material during cell operation. The phase change accompanies a volume decrease in the electrolyte which leads to lower ionic conductivity. Through various studies, it has been found that an alumina doped α-LiAlO2 matrix would improve the phase stability while maintaining the fuel cell's performance.
MTU fuel cell
The German company MTU Friedrichshafen presented an MCFC at the Hannover Fair in 2006. The unit weighs 2 tonnes and can produce 240 kW of electric power from various gaseous fuels, including biogas. If fueled by fuels that contain carbon such as natural gas, the exhaust will contain CO2 but will be reduced by up to 50% compared to diesel engines running on marine bunker fuel. The exhaust temperature is 400 °C, hot enough to be used for many industrial processes. Another possibility is to make more electric power via a steam turbine. Depending on feed gas type, the electric efficiency is between 12% and 19%. A steam turbine can increase the efficiency by up to 24%. The unit can be used for cogeneration.
- "Types of Fuel Cells - Fuel Cell Energy". www.fuelcellenergy.com. Retrieved 2015-11-02.
- "NFCRC Tutorial: Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC)". www.nfcrc.uci.edu. Retrieved 2015-11-02.
- "Types of Fuel Cells | Department of Energy". energy.gov. Retrieved 2015-11-02.
- "High Temperature Fuel Cells" (PDF). University of Babylon. Retrieved 1 November 2015.
- Boden, Andreas (2007). "The anode and the electrolyte in the MCFC" (PDF). Diva Portal. Retrieved 1 November 2015.
- Nguyen, Hoang Viet Phuc; Othman, Mohd Roslee; Seo, Dongho; Yoon, Sung Pil; Ham, Hyung Chul; Nam, Suk Woo; Han, Jonghee; Kim, Jinsoo (2014-08-04). "Nano Ni layered anode for enhanced MCFC performance at reduced operating temperature". International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39 (23): 12285–12290. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.253.
- Kim, Yun-Sung; Lim, Jun-Heok; Chun, Hai-Soo (2006-01-01). "Creep mechanism of porous MCFC Ni anodes strengthened by Ni3Al". AIChE Journal 52 (1): 359–365. doi:10.1002/aic.10630. ISSN 1547-5905.
- Wijayasinghe, Athula (2004). "Development and Characterisation of Cathode Materials for the Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell" (PDF). Retrieved 2 November 2015.
- Antolini, Ermete. "The stability of molten carbonate fuel cell electrodes: A review of recent improvements". Applied Energy 88 (12): 4274–4293. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.07.009.
- Fang, Baizeng; Liu, Xinyu; Wang, Xindong; Duan, Shuzhen (1998-01-15). "The mechanism of surface modification of a MCFC anode". Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 441 (1–2): 65–68. doi:10.1016/S0022-0728(97)00202-7.
- Kulkarni, A.; Giddey, S. (2012-06-08). "Materials issues and recent developments in molten carbonate fuel cells". Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 16 (10): 3123–3146. doi:10.1007/s10008-012-1771-y. ISSN 1432-8488.
- MCFC emission
- LLNL: The Carbon/Air Fuel Cell Conversion of Coal-Derived Carbons[dead link]
- MTU 240kW fuel cell[dead link] presented on the Hannover Fair 2006
- Logan Energy Limited integrate, install and operate all fuel cell technologies
- [dead link] molten carbonate fuel cells distributed generation challenge
-  presentation to Fourth Annual Conference on Carbon Capture and Sequestration