In probability theory and statistics, the moment-generating function of a real-valued random variable is an alternative specification of its probability distribution. Thus, it provides the basis of an alternative route to analytical results compared with working directly with probability density functions or cumulative distribution functions. There are particularly simple results for the moment-generating functions of distributions defined by the weighted sums of random variables. Note, however, that not all random variables have moment-generating functions.
In addition to real-valued distributions (univariate distributions), moment-generating functions can be defined for vector- or matrix-valued random variables, and can even be extended to more general cases.
The moment-generating function of a real-valued distribution does not always exist, unlike the characteristic function. There are relations between the behavior of the moment-generating function of a distribution and properties of the distribution, such as the existence of moments.
always exists and is equal to 1.
A key problem with moment-generating functions is that moments and the moment-generating function may not exist, as the integrals need not converge absolutely. By contrast, the characteristic function or Fourier transform always exists (because it is the integral of a bounded function on a space of finite measure), and for some purposes may be used instead.
More generally, where T, an n-dimensional random vector, and t a fixed vector, one uses instead of tX:
The reason for defining this function is that it can be used to find all the moments of the distribution. The series expansion of etX is:
where mn is the nth moment.
Differentiating MX(t) i times with respect to t and setting t = 0 we hence obtain the ith moment about the origin, mi; see Calculations of moments below.
If X is a continuous random variable, the following relation between its moment generating function MX(t) and the two-sided Laplace transform of its probability density function fX(x) holds:
as the PDF's two-sided Laplace transform is given as
and the moment generating function's definition expands to
This is consistent with the characteristic function of X being a Wick rotation of MX(t) when the moment generating function exists, as the characteristic function of a continuous random variable X is the Fourier transform of its probability density function fX(x), and in general when a function f(x) is of exponential order, the Fourier transform of f is a Wick rotation of its two-sided Laplace transform in the region of convergence. See the relation of the Fourier and Laplace transforms for further information.
Here are some examples of the moment generating function and the characteristic function for comparison. It can be seen that the characteristic function is a Wick rotation of the moment generating function MX(t) when the latter exists.
|Distribution||Moment-generating function MX(t)||Characteristic function φ(t)|
|Binomial B(n, p)|
|Uniform (continuous) U(a, b)|
|Uniform (discrete) U(a, b)|
|Normal N(μ, σ2)|
|Gamma Γ(k, θ)||;|
|Multivariate normal N(μ, Σ)|
|Laplace L(μ, b)|
|Negative Binomial NB(r, p)|
|Cauchy Cauchy(μ, θ)||Does not exist|
The moment-generating function is the expectation of a function of the random variable, it can be written as:
- For a discrete probability mass function,
- For a continuous probability density function,
- In the general case: , using the Riemann–Stieltjes integral, and where F is the cumulative distribution function.
where mn is the nth moment.
Linear combination of independent random variables
If , where the Xi are independent random variables and the ai are constants, then the probability density function for Sn is the convolution of the probability density functions of each of the Xi, and the moment-generating function for Sn is given by
Vector-valued random variables
where t is a vector and is the dot product.
Moment generating functions are positive and log-convex, with M(0) = 1.
An important property of the moment-generating function is that if two distributions have the same moment-generating function, then they are identical at almost all points. That is, if for all values of t,
for all values of x (or equivalently X and Y have the same distribution). This statement is not equivalent to the statement "if two distributions have the same moments, then they are identical at all points." This is because in some cases, the moments exist and yet the moment-generating function does not, because the limit
may not exist. The lognormal distribution is an example of when this occurs.
Calculations of moments
Here n must be a nonnegative integer.
Jensen's inequality provides a simple lower bound on the moment-generating function:
where is the mean of X.
Hoeffding's lemma provides a bound on the moment-generating function in the case of a zero-mean, bounded random variable.
When all moments are non-negative, the moment generating function gives a simple, useful bound on the moments:
Take for example the standard normal , then and so we get that , which is tight up to a factor .
Relation to other functions
Related to the moment-generating function are a number of other transforms that are common in probability theory:
- Characteristic function
- The characteristic function is related to the moment-generating function via the characteristic function is the moment-generating function of iX or the moment generating function of X evaluated on the imaginary axis. This function can also be viewed as the Fourier transform of the probability density function, which can therefore be deduced from it by inverse Fourier transform.
- Cumulant-generating function
- The cumulant-generating function is defined as the logarithm of the moment-generating function; some instead define the cumulant-generating function as the logarithm of the characteristic function, while others call this latter the second cumulant-generating function.
- Probability-generating function
- The probability-generating function is defined as This immediately implies that
This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. (February 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)