(Cif.) H.C. Evans, Stalpers, Samson & Benny, (1978)
Crinipellis roreri (Cif.) H.C. Evans, (2002)
Moniliophthora roreri is a basidiomycete fungus that causes frosty pod rot disease, one of the most serious problems for cacao (Theobroma cacao— the source of chocolate) production in Latin America. This disease and together with witches’ broom disease (caused by M. perniciosa) and black pod rot (caused by Phytophthora sp.) constitute the cacao disease trilogy. It causes serious losses in southwestern parts of South America; spores are dry and powdery and are spread easily by water movement, wind, or movement of pods; disease spread is highest during periods of high rainfall.
Originally, M. roreri was described as an anamorphic ascomycete, Monilia roreri Cif., due to the absence of a recognizable fruiting body or a sexual stage and other similarities to species of Monilia. Later on it was noticed that the septa of the pathogen contained dolipores and septal pore caps, which are features of basidiomycete fungi. Consequently Monilia roreri was reclassified and given its current name, Moniliophthora roreri (Cif.) H.C. Evans, Stalpers, Samson & Benny. More recently, it was shown that M. roreri and the causal agent of witches’ broom of cacao, M. perniciosa, are sister species within the Marasmiaceae family of mushrooms.
The main hosts of M. roreri are plants in the Malvaceae that belong to the genus Theobroma, such as T. cacao, T. gileri, T. bicolor, and T. grandiflorum, as well as plants in the closely related genus Herrania. In contrast, the sister species M. perniciosa has a much broader host range, including hosts in the Solanaceae, Malpighiaceae, and Bignoniaceae.
Infection process and symptomatology
M. roreri is a hemibiotrophic fungus that forms swollen irregularly shaped intercellular mycelia. The infection process starts when conidia of M. roreri land on the surface of the pods. Then they germinate and penetrate the pod directly through the epidermis, causing internal damage in the early stages of the disease. External symptoms like dark spots on the surface of pods can be seen only after 40 to 80 days post infection; thus infected pods during the early stages appear asymptomatic, which is one factor that has led to the unwitting movement of infected pods by humans. One week after the appearance of dark lesions, the characteristic white powder of the disease appears on the surface of infected pods. The powdery appearance is due to the presence of millions of conidia that can reach up to 44 million per square centimeter with a mature infected pod capable of producing more than seven billion spores.
Frosty pod rot is an interesting disease because its causal agent, M. roreri, belongs to a mushroom-forming family, but it has never been observed to produce a mushroom or other type of sexual fruiting structure. Therefore, no evidence of a sexual stage has been found in this fungus thus far.
History of the disease
The first verified report of frosty pod rot is from Ecuador in 1895; some years later in the region of Quevedo, Ecuador in 1918, the most famous outbreak in the history of the disease was reported, causing abandonment of most of the cacao plantations over a period of three years. However, an earlier disease in Colombia may have also been caused by M. roreri. In 1817 in the region of Santander, Colombia, a disease with symptomology that matches that of frosty pod rot was reported; therefore, many researchers believe the first known report of frosty pod rot of cacao was in Colombia around one century before the famous outbreak in Ecuador.
Before the 1950s, M. roreri was confined to Ecuador, Colombia, and western Venezuela. However, during the last 50 years, the disease has spread southward into Peru (in 1988), and northward into all cacao-growing areas of Central America (Costa Rica, 1978; Nicaragua, 1979; Honduras, 1997; Guatemala, 2002; Belize, 2004 and Mexico, 2005), in many cases resulting in abandonment of the entire plantation by farmers. The presence of the disease was confirmed in El Salvador and Bolivia in 2009 and 2012, respectively, where the fungus probable arrived some years before. This invasive behavior of the disease represents a threat to cacao growers from Brazil and also to areas outside of Latin America where the majority of the world cocoa is currently produced.
Economic impact of the disease
In Colombia, specifically in the Santander region, average annual losses are of 40% of dry cacao equivalent to US$33 million due to the disease. In Ecuador, during the 1918 outbreak, cacao exportation was reduced from 46,000 to 37,700 tons due to frosty pod rot. In Peru, around 16,500 ha of cacao were abandoned mostly as a result of frosty pod rot, with a final result that Peru went from being an exporter of chocolate to a net importer. In Mexico, in the state of Tabasco, the first report of the disease was in April 2005, and by 2007, frosty pod rot had invaded all cacao areas of the state, becoming the major limiting factor to cacao production there, as well as in Nicaragua and Honduras.
- Fulton, RH (1989). "The Cacao Disease Trilogy : Black Pod , Monilia Pod Rot , and Witches' Broom". Plant Disease. 73: 601–603. doi:10.1094/pd-73-0601.
- Ciferri, R.; Parodi, E. (1933). "Descrizione del fungo che causa la "Moniliasi" del cacao.". Phytopathologische Zeitschrift. 5: 539–542.
- Evans, HC; Satlpers, JA; Samson, RA; Benny, GL (1978). "On the taxonomy of Monilia roreri, an iomportant pathogen of Theobroma cacao in South America.". Canadian Journal of Botany. 56: 2528–2532. doi:10.1139/b78-305.
- Aime, M.C.; Phillips-Mora, W. (2005). "The causal agents of witches' and frosty pod rot of cacao (chocolate, Theobroma cacao) form a new lineage of Marasmiaceae". Mycologia. 97 (5): 1012–1022. doi:10.3852/mycologia.97.5.1012. PMID 16596953.
- Evans, HC (1986). "A reassessment of Moniliophthora (Monilia) pod rot of cocoa.". Cocoa Growers' Bulletin. 37: 34–43.
- Meinhardt, Lyndel; Rincones, J; Bailey, B; Aime, MC; Griffith, GW; Zhang, D; Pereira, G (2008). "Moniliophthora perniciosa, the causal agent of witches' broom disease of cacao: what's new from this old foe?". Molecular Plant Pathology. 9 (5): 577–588. doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00496.x.
- Griffith, GW; Nicholson, J; Nenninger, A; Birch, RN; Hedger, JN (2003). "Witches' broom and frosty pods: two major pathogens of cacao". New Zealand Journal of Botany. 41: 423–435. doi:10.1080/0028825x.2003.9512860.
- Suárez, C (1971). Estudio del mecanismo de penetración y del proceso de infección de Monilia roreri Cif. Par. en frutos de cacao (Theobroma cacao). Guayaquil, Ecuador: Universidad de Guayaquil. p. 54p.
- Campuzano, H (1971). Proceedings of the Eighth International Cocoa Research Conference, 1981, Cartagena, Colombia. Cartagena, Colombia: Cocoa Producer’s Alliance. pp. 425–428.
- Phillips-Mora, Wilbert (2003). Origin, Biogeography, Genetic Diversity and Taxonomic Afﬁnities of the Cacao Fungus Moniliophthora roreri as determined using Molecular, Phytopathological and Morpho-Physiological Evidence. Reading, UK: The University of Reading.
- Phillips-Mora, Wilbert; Aime, M. C.; Wilkinson, M. J. (2007). "Biodiversity and biogeography of the cacao (Theobroma cacao) pathogen Moniliophthora roreri in tropical America". Plant Pathology. 56: 911–922. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2007.01646.x.
- Phillips-Mora, Wilbert; Arciniegas-Leal, A.; Mata-Quiros, A.; Motamayor-Arias, J.C. (2013). "Catalogue of cacao clones selected by CATIE for commercial plantings; CATIE Technical series. Technical manual #105/". 1: 68.
- Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. "FAOSTAT".
- Krauss, U; Soberanis, W (2001). "Rehabilitation of diseased cacao fields in Peru through shade regulation and timing of biocontrol measures". Agroforestry Systems. 53: 179–184.
- Phillips-Mora, W; Coutiño, A; Ortiz, C; López, A; Hernández, J; Aime, MC (2006). "First report of Moniliophthora roreri causing frosty pod rot (moniliasis disease) of cocoa in México". Plant Pathology. 55 (4): 584. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2006.01418.x.
- Ramirez-Gonzalez, S.I. (2008). "Moniliasis a challenge to achieve the sustainability of cacao in Mexico". Technol. Marcha. 21: 97–110.