In the 7th century, after the failure of Justinian I and the Second Council of Constantinople to mend the Chalcedonian schism and unify the empire by a single Christology, the emperor Heraclius attempted to solve the schism between the Orthodox Chalcedonian party and the monophysite non-Chalcedonian party, suggesting the compromise of monoenergism. This compromise adopted the Chalcedonian dyophysite belief that Christ the Incarnate Logos of God is of and in two natures, but tried to address monophysite misgivings by the view that Christ had one "energy" (energeia), a term whose definition was left deliberately vague. Monoenergism was accepted by the Patriarchs of Constantinople, Antioch and Alexandria, as well as by the Armenians and was not criticized by Pope Honorius I of Rome. However, the strong opposition of Patriarch Sophronius of Jerusalem won wide support. This led Heraclius to abandon the teaching in 638 and to attempt to enforce instead the doctrine of monothelitism, opposed most notably by Maximus the Confessor. This too failed to heal the schism and theologically unite the Empire.
- Meyendorff, John (1989). Imperial unity and Christian divisions: The Church 450-680 A.D. The Church in history. 2. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press. ISBN 978-0-88-141056-3.
- Hovorun, Cyril (2008). Will, Action and Freedom: Christological Controversies in the Seventh Century. Leiden-Boston: BRILL.
- Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Monothelitism and Monothelites". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
|This Christian theology article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|