Page extended-protected


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Namecoin Logo
Original author(s)Vincent Durham
Initial release18 April 2011 (11 years ago) (2011-04-18)[1]
Latest release0.21.0[2] / 29 January 2021 (15 months ago) (2021-01-29)
Code repository
Development statusActive
Project fork ofBitcoin
Ledger start17 April 2011 (11 years ago) (2011-04-17)[5]
Timestamping schemeProof-of-work (merged mining)[3]
Hash functionSHA-256
Block time10 minutes[4]
Supply limit21,000,000[4]

Namecoin (Symbol: or NMC) is a cryptocurrency originally forked from bitcoin software. It is based on the code of bitcoin and uses the same proof-of-work algorithm. Like bitcoin, it is limited to 21 million coins.[4]

Namecoin can store data within its own blockchain transaction database. The original proposal for Namecoin called for Namecoin to insert data into bitcoin's blockchain directly. Anticipating scaling difficulties with this approach, a shared proof-of-work (POW) system was proposed to secure new cryptocurrencies with different use cases.

Namecoin's flagship use case is the censorship-resistant top level domain .bit, which is functionally similar to .com or .net domains but is independent of ICANN, the main governing body for domain names.[6]


A peer-to-peer network similar to bitcoin's handles Namecoin's transactions, balances and issuance through SHA256, proof-of-work scheme (they are issued when a small enough hash value is found, at which point a block is created; the process of finding these hashes and creating blocks is called mining). The issuing rate forms a geometric series, and the rate halves every 210,000 blocks, roughly every four years, reaching a final total of 21 million NMC.


Each Namecoin record consists of a key and a value which can be up to 520 bytes in size. Each key is actually a path, with the namespace preceding the name of the record. The key d/example signifies a record stored in the DNS namespace d with the name example and corresponds to the record for the example.bit website. The content of d/example is expected to conform to the DNS namespace specification.

The current fee for a record is 0.01 NMC and records expire after 36000 blocks (~200 days) unless updated or renewed. Namecoins used to purchase records are marked as used and destroyed, as giving the fee to miners would enable larger miners to register names at a significant discount.[7]


.bit is a top-level domain that was created outside the most commonly used Domain Name System (DNS) of the Internet, and is not sanctioned by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). The .bit domain is served via Namecoin infrastructure, which acts as an alternative, decentralized domain name system.

Proposed potential uses for Namecoin besides domain name registration include notary/timestamp systems.[8]


In September 2010, a discussion was started in the BitcoinTalk forum about a hypothetical system called BitDNS and generalizing bitcoin. Gavin Andresen and Satoshi Nakamoto joined the discussion in the BitcoinTalk forum and supported the idea of BitDNS, and a reward for implementing BitDNS was announced on the forum in December 2010.

On block 19200 Namecoin activated the merged mining upgrade to allow mining of Bitcoin and Namecoin simultaneously, instead of having to choose between one or the other; this fixed the issue of miners jumping from one blockchain to another when the profitability becomes favorable in the former.[3]

Two years later, in June 2013, NameID was launched.[9] NameID allows to associate profile information with identities on the Namecoin blockchain, and an OpenID provider to allow logging into existing websites with Namecoin identities. The main site itself is accompanied by an open protocol for password-less authentication with Namecoin identities, a corresponding free-software implementation and a supporting extension for Firefox.

In October 2013, Michael Gronager, main developer of libcoin, found a security issue in the Namecoin protocol, which allowed modifying foreign names. It was successfully fixed in a short timeframe and was never exploited, except for bitcoin.bit as a proof-of-concept.[10][citation needed]

Namecoin was also mentioned by ICANN in a public report as the most well-known example of distributing control and privacy in DNS.[11]

A 2015 study found that of the 120,000 domain names registered on Namecoin, only 28 were in use.[12]

In December 2018, a proposal was tabled on the OpenNIC mailing list to drop support for Namecoin .bit domains.[13], citing Spamhaus' (and by extension other antivirus software) blocking of several of their servers owing to spread of malware from some .bit domains, as well as concerns about potential child pornography. The vote did not reach a consensus.[14]

In the same month, OpenNIC was advised to drop support for .bit namespace owing to security concerns of Namecoin and PRISM Break developers.[15]

In July 2019, OpenNIC again voted on dropping the .bit namespace, citing "numerous problems with support of NameCoin domains" and recent animosity between the two projects. The vote passed.[16] Namecoin developer Jeremy Rand welcomed the move, thanking OpenNIC and describing it as the "right decision".[17][18][19]

See also


  1. ^ "[announce] Namecoin - a distributed naming system based on Bitcoin".
  2. ^ "Releases - namecoin/namecoin-core" – via GitHub.
  3. ^ a b "Merged Mining: Analysis of Effects and Implications". Retrieved 2018-12-24.
  4. ^ a b c Loibl, Andreas (2014-08-01). "Namecoin" (PDF).
  5. ^ "Block #0".
  6. ^ Dourado, Eli (2014-02-05). "Can Namecoin Obsolete ICANN (and More)?". Theumlaut.
  7. ^ "Namecoin FAQ". Archived from the original on 2014-10-09.
  8. ^ Kirk, Jeremy (2013-05-24). "Could the Bitcoin network be used as an ultrasecure notary service?". Techworld.
  9. ^ Kraft, Daniel (2013-07-25). "NameID - Use namecoin id/ to log into OpenID sites". Namecoin Forum.
  10. ^ bitcoin.bit name operation is in tx-id 2f034f2499c136a2c5a922ca4be65c1292815c753bbb100a2a26d5ad532c3919
  11. ^ "The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Identifier Technology Innovation Report" (PDF). ICANN. 2014-05-15. Retrieved 2021-10-17.
  12. ^ Kalodner, H. A., Carlsten, M., Ellenbogen, P., Bonneau, J., & Narayanan, A. (2015, June). "An Empirical Study of Namecoin and Lessons for Decentralized Namespace Design". In WEIS.
  13. ^ "Should we have a vote on .bit ?". opennic-discuss.
  14. ^ "Vote to keep or drop peering with NameCoin". opennic-discuss.
  15. ^ "Drop OpenNIC (!2073) · Merge Requests · PRISM Break / PRISM Break". GitLab. Retrieved 2021-01-23.
  16. ^ "Should OpenNIC drop support for NameCoin [OpenNIC Wiki]". Retrieved 2021-01-23.
  17. ^ "OpenNIC does the right thing: listens to security concerns and shuts down its centralized Namecoin inproxy".
  18. ^ "Namecoin : l'intégrité, mais à quel prix?". ZDNet France (in French). 2019-08-01. Retrieved 2021-11-27.
  19. ^ "What is Namecoin's relationship to OpenNIC?".

External links