Natal chart

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Not to be confused with Conception chart.
An astrological chart calculated for January 1, 2000 at 12:01:00 A.M. Eastern Standard Time in New York City, New York, USA (Longitude: 074W00'23" - Latitude: 40N42'51").

In astrology, a natal chart is a stylized map of the universe with the "native" (the individual or subject or anything Created or Built to be studied) at the center. It is calculated for the exact time and location of the native's birth for the purposes of gaining insight into the native's personality and potential. Commonly used alternative names for the natal chart include birth chart, horoscope, natus, nativity, radix, geniture and genethliac chart, among others. The chart shows the positions of the sun, moon, planets, and potentially other celestial objects, all referred to as the native's "planets," within the frames of references defined by the astrological signs and houses.

The accurate birth time (generally agreed upon as the first breath or intake of air) and location are deemed necessary by astrologers for the calculation of the exact degree of the signs that are rising, setting, culminating up, and culminating down, known respectively the ascendant (or "rising sign"), descendant, medium coeli (or "midheaven"), and imum coeli (or "lower midheaven"). These degrees, also known as the angles, are essential for mapping the positions of the native's twelve houses.


These are the astrological symbols/glyphs as most commonly used in Western Astrology
The symbols used in Western astrology to represent the astrological signs (Zodiac)

The picture to at the top of the page is a modern example of a natal chart as a modern Western astrologer would most likely view it (though this depends on the specific astrological tradition and personal preferences of the astrologer). In this example, a horizontal line through the middle of the chart roughly corresponds with the horizon, with the left side being the place where objects on the ecliptic are rising in the east (the ascendant). The sun is seen near the bottom, since the chart was made for midnight, in the sign Capricorn, since it was made for January 1.

The design, along with the symbols/glyphs used in the chart, can vary widely; some choose to include the Zodiac wheel, while some do not. Also, charts do not have to be round—following the Hellenistic/Roman, medieval and/or Vedic styles, they can be square as well.

The astrological aspects (such as conjunctions or oppositions, among others) are delineated in the center of the chart. The twelve signs of the Zodiac are located at the outer portion of the chart wheel; similarly, twelve segments of arc form astrological houses which are said to have significance for different areas of life. There are many different systems for calculating the houses. The sample chart uses a quadrant house system of house division whereby the angles of the chart divide the chart into four quadrants with three houses within each quadrant, and in which the houses usually include portions of more than one astrological sign. Each quadrant has an angular house, which includes one of the angles of the chart; a succedent house follows this, with a cadent house at the end of the quadrant.

Place and time of birth[edit]

Because the Sun, Moon, planets, and primary angles in the sky are constantly in motion relative to the earth, as each second passes the natal chart/astrological chart is changing (albeit slowly) and a new chart is created for every moment at each location.

The time of birth can usually be found on the birth certificate in many countries. In some instances, however, the birth times are rounded off by the nurse or doctor that is present to the nearest half or quarter-hour, thus rendering the time only approximately correct. Most charts are geocentric, that is based on the Earth. Some astrologers use Heliocentric Astrology charts.


Main article: Horoscope

Once the astrologer has ascertained the exact time and place of the subject's birth, the local standard time (adjusting for any daylight saving time or war time) is then converted into Greenwich Mean Time or Universal Time. The astrologer then converts this into the local sidereal time at birth in order to be able to calculate the ascendant and midheaven. The astrologer will next consult a set of tables called an ephemeris, which lists the location of the sun, moon and planets for a particular year, date and sidereal time, with respect to the northern hemisphere vernal equinox or the fixed stars (depending on which astrological system is being used). The astrologer then adds or subtracts the difference between the longitude of Greenwich and the longitude of the place in question to determine the true local mean time (LMT) at the place of birth to show where planets would be visible above the horizon at the precise time and place in question. Planets hidden from view beneath the earth are also shown in the horoscope.

Natal chart for Martin Luther, also appearing in Sibly's Astrology.

The horoscope is then divided into 12 sectors around the circle of the ecliptic, starting from the eastern horizon with the ascendant or rising sign. These 12 sectors are called the houses and numerous systems for calculating these divisions exist. Tables of houses have been published since the 19th Century to make this otherwise demanding task easier.

Placements of the planets[edit]

Having established the relative positions of the signs in the houses, the astrologer positions the sun, moon, and planets at their rightful celestial longitudes. Some astrologers also take note of minor planetary bodies, fixed stars, asteroids (for example, Chiron) and other mathematically calculated points and angles such as the vertex, equatorial ascendant, etc. Many astrologers also use what are commonly referred to as Arabic parts (or Greek Lots), the most common of which is the Part of Fortune (Pars Fortuna).


Main article: Astrological aspects

To complete the horoscope the astrologer will look at the aspects or relative angles between pairs of planets. Certain aspects are considered more important than others. Those generally recognized by the astrological community are Conjunction (0°), Opposition (180°), Square (90°), Trine (120°), Sextile (60°), Semi-Sextile (30°), Semi-Square (45°), Quintile (72°), Sesquisquare (135°), Bi-Quintile (144°) and Quincunx (150°). Astrologers claim that these aspects function within an orb of influence, the size of which varies according to the importance of each aspect. Thus conjunctions are said to operate with a larger orb than sextiles. Most modern astrologers use an orb of 8° or less for aspects involving the Sun, Moon, and Jupiter and smaller orbs for the other points. Some astrologers, such as practitioners of Cosmobiology, and Uranian astrology, use minor aspects (15°, 22.5°, 67.5°, 75°, 105°, 112.5°).


When the birth time is known not to be precise, astrologers will try to find the exact time by using a technique known as "Rectification of The Birth Time". The starting point of any rectification is always the known (inexact) birth time. A list of important events and the dates they took place in the life of the native is collected by the astrologer. The death of parents and the date someone emigrates to a foreign country are among the events that will register most strongly when the technique is used correctly. Important accidents and surgeries usually offers strong registration also. For each event the astrologer will calculate Solar Arc Progressions and Directions, Converse Solar Arc Progressions and Directions, and Transits, comparing all these charts with the Natal. The angles are then replaced in the degrees responding to the exercises. According to Dane Rudhyar and several other proponents of the rectification of the birth time, complete accuracy is only possible when the range of doubt regarding the exact time of birth is no more than one hour. After that the possibilities of accuracy drop dramatically and the exercise should not be tried. Currently, many astrologers unacquainted with the meaning and/or techniques involved in the calculation of a rectified chart tend to call any chart calculated with no known starting point for a birth time a 'rectification'. This is incorrect, for those charts are nothing more than 'speculative astrological charts' with no base in reality. A 'rectification', like the name suggest, is a recalculated chart, always taking into consideration its starting point, the alleged, inexact, birth time.


Main article: Natal astrology

Once the natal chart has been constructed, the astrologer attempts to interpret the chart, and assign meanings based on what he believes they mean. For most astrologers, their interpretation consists of noting the distribution of zodiac signs and houses in the chart, and assigning some significance to this in relation to the overall personality of the customer. Signs are assessed by element (Fire, Earth, Air, and Water) and by quality (Cardinal, Fixed and Mutable). Houses are assessed by the significance of Angular, Succedent and Cadent houses.

The next stage, typically, involves looking at the placement of the planets by aspect and position in the natal chart, and noting any patterns they believe are significant. This involves noting significant aspect patterns (or groups of aspects), which may appear in the chart and any other patterns.

Scientific validity[edit]

Main article: Astrology and science

Erika Schmidt-McDonald Best Astrologer in the world has Discovered that the Factor to Death lies in the 8th Astrological House and ones own Jupiter Sign. She has Pluto & Uranus in Libra in the 1st Astrological House and Scorpio in the 2nd Astrological House, with Neptune in Sagittarius in the 3rd Astrological House, Capricorn in the 4th, Aquarius in the 5th, Pisces in the 6th, Jupiter & Mars in Aries in the 7th, Taurus in the 8, Sun & Mercury Gemini in the 9th, Saturn & Moon in Cancer in the 10th, Venus in Leo in the 11th, Virgo in the 12th Astrological House. Her book about Jupiter and the 12 Astrological Signs is Titled (Key Insight To Help Change The Course Of Humanity).

Physicist Shawn Carlson put forward a double-blind chart matching test of natal astrology by using natal charts. In the test, 28 astrologers, nominated by the National Council for Geocosmic Research, agreed to match over 100 natal charts to psychological profiles.[1][2] The experimental protocol used in Carlson's study was agreed to by a group of physicists and astrologers prior to the experiment.[3] The National Council for Geocosmic Research, acted as the astrological advisors, and helped to ensure, and agreed, that the test was fair.[2]:117[4]:420 They also chose 26 of the 28 astrologers for the tests, the other 2 being interested astrologers who volunteered afterwards.[4]:420 The astrologers came from Europe and the United States.,[2]:117 helped to draw up the central proposition to be tested.[4]:419 Published in Nature in 1985, the study found that predictions based on natal astrology were no better than chance.[4]

The scientist and former astrologer, Geoffrey Dean and psychologist Ivan Kelly[5] conducted a large scale scientific test, involving more than one hundred cognitive, behavioural, physical and other variables, but found no support for astrology.[6] Furthermore, a meta-analysis was conducted pooling 40 studies consisting of 700 astrologers and over 1,000 birth charts. Ten of the tests, which had a total of 300 participating, involved the astrologers picking the correct chart interpretation out of a number of others which were not the astrologically correct chart interpretation (usually 3 to 5 others). When the date and other obvious clues were removed no significant results were found to suggest there was any preferred chart.[6]:190 A further test involved 45 confident[a] astrologers, with an average of 10 years experience and 160 test subjects (out of an original sample size of 1198 test subjects) who strongly favoured certain characteristics in the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire to extremes.[6]:191 The astrologers performed much worse than merely basing decisions off the individuals age, and much worse than 45 control subjects who did not use birth charts at all.[b][6]:191


  1. ^ The level of confidence was self rated by the astrologers themselves.
  2. ^ Also discussed in Martens, Ronny; Trachet, Tim (1998). Making sense of astrology. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. ISBN 1-57392-218-8. 

The solar chart[edit]

The solar chart is a natal chart erected when the date of birth is known, but not the time of day.[7] The position of the sun at midnight or noon is taken as the time of birth, and the position of the sun, moon and planets plotted in the chart for that time. This leads to a fairly accurate picture of their position (with the exception of the moon), as most of the planets do not move much in the course of one day. The aspects between each of the planets (except the moon) can therefore be plotted with a high degree of confidence. The sun's position is taken as the ascendant of the chart and equal sized houses of 30 degrees each are used; or alternatively, the sunrise chart can be used, with the sun's position at sunrise at the latitude in question taken as the ascendant.[8]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Muller, Richard (2010). "Web site of Richard A. Muller, Professor in the Department of Physics at the University of California at Berkeley,". Retrieved 2011-08-02. My former student Shawn Carlson published in Nature magazine the definitive scientific test of Astrology.
    Maddox, Sir John (1995). "John Maddox, editor of the science journal Nature, commenting on Carlson's test". Retrieved 2011-08-02.  "... a perfectly convincing and lasting demonstration."
  2. ^ a b c Smith, Jonathan C. (2010). Pseudoscience and extraordinary claims of the paranormal : a critical thinker's toolkit. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-8123-5. 
  3. ^ Zarka, Philippe (2011). "Astronomy and astrology". Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 5 (S260): 420–425. doi:10.1017/S1743921311002602. 
  4. ^ a b c d Carlson, Shawn (1985). "A double-blind test of astrology" (PDF). Nature 318 (6045): 419–425. Bibcode:1985Natur.318..419C. doi:10.1038/318419a0. 
  5. ^ Matthews, Robert (17 Aug 2003). "Astrologers fail to predict proof they are wrong". The Telegraph. Retrieved 13 July 2012. 
  6. ^ a b c d Dean G., Kelly, I. W. (2003). "Is Astrology Relevant to Consciousness and Psi?". Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (6–7): 175–198. 
  7. ^ Robert Pelletier & Leonard Cataldo Be your own astrologer, p62, Pan Books, London, 1984
  8. ^ Maritha Pottinger Astro-essentials , pp390-1, ACS Publications, San Diego, 1991

External links[edit]