National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism
The National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) is a research and education center at the University of Maryland, College Park focused on the scientific study of the causes and consequences of terrorism in the United States and around the world. It maintains the Global Terrorism Database, which includes over 125,000 terrorist attacks which it describes as the "most comprehensive unclassified data base on terrorist events in the world."
START was launched in 2005 as one of the Centers of Excellence supported by the Department of Homeland Security in the United States. Since its launch, it has been under the directorship of Gary LaFree, a professor of criminology at the University of Maryland, College Park. START received a 3-year $12 million initial grant from the Department of Homeland Security in 2005 and the grant was renewed by DHS in 2008. It launched its undergraduate Terrorism Studies Minor in 2007 and its graduate certificate in 2010.
START has developed an undergraduate Global Terrorism Minor program, one of the options in the University of Maryland's Global Studies Minor program (other options include the International Development and Conflict Management minor, the International Engineering minor, the Global Poverty minor, and the Global Engineering minor). It also offers an online Gradual Certificate in Terrorism Analysis Program.
START offers a number of datasets related to terrorism. The most important of these is the Global Terrorism Database, a database of over 113,000 terrorist attacks from 1970 till 2015, excluding the year 1993 (as of July 2016). START also hosts the MIPT Terrorism Knowledge Base, now known as the Terrorist Organization Profiles, but does not actively maintain or take responsibility for the data.
Social Media Use during Disasters
Social Media Use during Disasters is a research project that was conducted from July 2012 to October 2013, and it is one of the major contributions by the START research center to the risk communication field. Sites such as Facebook and Twitter are used to collect and distribute information quickly and easily. Because of this function of social media, it is being used as a tool to communicate about disasters. “Given the growing importance of social media as a disaster communication tool, it is vital to understand how individuals use, behave, and interpret information on social media sites to better inform policy, guidance, and operations and to ensure that emergency managers, first responders, and policy makers can best optimize how they use these tools.”. A random sample of 2,015 U.S. residents participated in this study. The participants were asked to imagine that a disaster involving multiple terrorist attacks was unfolding. The participants were then presented with information from both local and national sources about the disaster through Facebook posts and tweets. Participants were then asked to complete a questionnaire assessing their responses to the information. The study found that the source of the information impacted its perceived credibility. However, the source alone did not influence participants’ likelihood of taking recommended action. The study also showed that after participants were exposed to the information they were more likely to communicate that information through interpersonal channels rather than through organizational media channels. Finally, the study also showed that demographics such as gender and age affected how participants responded to the information.
Training in Risk and Crisis Communication
Training in Risk and Crisis Communication (TRACC) is another major contribution by START to the risk communication field. TRACC is a curriculum presented by the START research center for the benefit of organizations. TRACC is separated into 3 modules that aim to train organizations on how to properly communicate crisis information before, during, and after the crisis situation. “TRACC is a unique curriculum that is research-based and covers the entire life-cycle of a crisis including preparation, response and recovery." 
Organizational Dimensions of Risk Communication during Homeland Security Crises
The START research center also completed a project titled Organizational Dimensions of Risk Communication during Homeland Security Crises. This project focuses on risk communication at the organizational level by “exploring how communications within and among organizations affect risk management and risk communication about bioterrorism."  This project aims to improve communication about bioterrorism between organizations and their public. For this study, researchers focused on the anthrax attacks of 2001. The researchers conducted over 50 interviews with local people who were in positions with agency such as law enforcement officers, elected officials, and health professionals. Researchers asked the participants to describe how decisions were made in their organizations and how information was communicated from their organizations. Forms of written communication such as electronic correspondence and reports were also analyzed. This study produced 5 major findings. The first is “Organizations faced both technical and social uncertainties."  These uncertainties included that the authorities in the situation were unclear, and these uncertainties negatively affected risk communication. The second major finding of this study is “Organizational networks were essential for risk communication to the public and workers."  This means that successful risk communication depends on how effective the communication process is between agencies. The third major finding is “Relationships among local professional first responders and public health agencies were often constructive."  Informal methods of communication between law enforcement officers and health professionals help facilitate communication to the public. The fourth major finding is, “Communication problems resulted from lack of communication triage."  This means that organizations did not prioritize their many audiences or their channels for reaching those audiences. The fifth and final major finding is, “The concept of elite panic needs further conceptualizing and research."  Researchers noticed the concept of elite panic during the interview analysis process. This concept needs to be better understood to improve crisis communication.
- "About START". National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), University of Maryland, College Park. Retrieved June 12, 2014.
- "Overview of the GTD". Global Terrorism Database. Retrieved June 12, 2014.
- "DHS Centers of Excellence Network". Retrieved June 12, 2014.
- "Global Terrorism Minor Program". National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. Retrieved June 12, 2014.
- "Global Studies Program". University of Maryland, College Park. Retrieved June 12, 2014.
- "Graduate Certificate (online)". National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. Retrieved June 12, 2014.
- "Data and Tools". National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. Retrieved June 12, 2014.
- "Terrorist Organization Profiles". National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. Retrieved June 12, 2014.
- Liu, B. (2013). Social Media Use During Disasters [Abstract]. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism
- Liu, B., Petrun, E., & Izsak, K. (2013). Training in Risk and Crisis Communication [Abstract]. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism
- Chess, C. (2009). Organizational Dimensions of Risk Communication during Homeland Security Crisis [Abstract]. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism
- "National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (tag)". Huffington Post. Retrieved June 12, 2014.
- Shane, Scott (April 16, 2013). "Bombings End Decade of Strikingly Few Successful Terrorism Attacks in U.S.". New York Times. Retrieved June 12, 2014.
- Ackerman, Spencer (April 30, 2014). "Global terrorism rose 43% in 2013 despite al-Qaida splintering, US reports". The Guardian. Retrieved June 12, 2014.
- Chinni, Dante (April 19, 2013). "Politics Counts: Terror Fears and Polls". Retrieved June 12, 2014.