A landrace is a domesticated, locally adapted, often traditional variety of a species of animal or plant that has developed over time, through adaptation to its natural and cultural environment of agriculture and pastoralism, and due to isolation from other populations of the species. Landraces are distinct from cultivars and from standard breeds.
A significant proportion of farmers around the world grow landrace crops., and most plant landraces are associated with traditional agricultural systems. Landraces of many crops have probably been grown for millennia. Increasing reliance upon modern plant cultivars that are bred to be uniform has led to a reduction in biodiversity, because most of the genetic diversity of domesticated plant species lies in landraces and other traditionally used varieties. Some farmers using scientifically improved varieties also continue to raise landraces for agronomic reasons that include: better adaptation to the local environment, lower fertilizer requirements, lower cost, and better disease resistance. Cultural and market preferences for landraces include culinary uses and product attributes such as texture, color, or ease of use.
Plant landraces have been the subject of more academic research, and the majority of academic literature about landraces is focused on botany in agriculture, not animal husbandry. Animal landraces are distinct from ancestral wild species of modern animal stock, and are also distinct from separate species or subspecies derived from the same ancestor as modern domestic stock. Not all landraces derive from wild or ancient animal stock; in some cases, notably dogs and horses, domestic animals have escaped in sufficient numbers in an area to breed feral populations that form new landraces through evolutionary pressure.
There are differences between authoritative sources on the specific criteria which describe landraces, although there is broad consensus about the existence and utility of the classification. Individual criteria may be weighted differently depending on a given source's focus (e.g., governmental regulation, biological sciences, agribusiness, anthropology and culture, environmental conservation, pet -keeping and -breeding, etc.). Additionally, not all cultivars agreed to be landraces exhibit every characteristic of a landrace. General features that characterize a landrace may include:
- It is morphologically distinctive and identifiable (i.e., has particular and recognizable characteristics or properties), yet remains "dynamic".
- It is genetically adapted to, and has a reputation for being able to withstand, the conditions of the local environment, including climate, disease and pests, even cultural practices.
- It is not the product of formal (governmental, organizational, or private) breeding programs, and may lack systematic selection, development and improvement by breeders.
- It is maintained and fostered less deliberately than a standardized breed, with its genetic isolation principally a matter of geography acting upon whatever animals that happened to be brought by humans to a given area.
- It has a historical origin in a specific geographic area, will usually have its own local name(s), and will often be classified according to intended purpose.
- Where yield (e.g. of a grain or fruit crop) can be measured, a landrace will show high stability of yield, even under adverse conditions, but a moderate yield level, even under carefully managed conditions.
- At the level of genetic testing, its heredity will show a degree of integrity, but still some genetic heterogeneity (i.e. genetic diversity).
Landrace literally means 'country-breed' (German: Landrasse) and close cognates of it are found in various Germanic languages. The first known reference to the role of landraces as genetic resources was made in 1890 at an agriculture and forestry congress in Vienna, Austria. The term was first defined by Kurt von Rümker in 1908, and more clearly described in 1909 by U. J. Mansholt, who wrote that landraces have more stable characteristics and better resistance to adverse conditions, but have lower production capacity than cultivars, and are apt to change genetically when moved to another environment. H. Kiessling added in 1912 that a landrace is a mixture of phenotypic forms despite relative outward uniformity, and a great adaptability to its natural and human environment.
The word landrace entered non-academic English in the early 1930s, by way of the Danish Landrace pig, a particular breed of lop-eared swine. Many other languages do not use separate terms, like landrace and breed, but instead rely on extended description to convey such distinctions. Spanish is one such language.
Geneticist D. Phillip Sponenberg described animal breeds within these classes: the landrace, the standardized breed, modern "type" breeds, industrial strains, and feral populations. He describes landraces as an early stage of breed development, created by a combination of founder effect, isolation, and environmental pressures. Human selection for production goals is also typical of landraces.
As discussed in more detail in breed, that term itself has several definitions from various scientific and animal husbandry perspectives. Some of those senses of breed relate to the concept of landraces. A Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) guideline defines landrace and landrace breed as "a breed that has largely developed through adaptation to the natural environment and traditional production system in which it has been raised." This is in contrast to its definition of standardized breed: "a breed of livestock that was developed according to a strict programme of genetic isolation and formal artificial selection to achieve a particular phenotype."
In various domestic species (including pigs, goats, sheep and geese) some standardized breeds include "Landrace" in their names, but do not meet widely used definitions of landraces. For example, the British Landrace pig is a standardized breed, derived from earlier breeds with "Landrace" names.
Farmers' variety, usually applied to local cultivars, or seen as intermediate between a landrace and a cultivar, may also include landraces when referring to plant varieties not subjected to formal breeding programs.
Autochthonous and allochthonous landraces
A landrace native to, or produced for a long time within the agricultural system in which it is found is referred to as an autochthonous landrace, while a more recently introduced one is termed an allochthonous landrace.
Within academic agronomy, the term autochthonous landrace is sometimes used with a more technical, productivity-related definition, synthesized by A. C. Zeven from previous definitions beginning with Mansholt's: "an autochthonous landrace is a variety with a high capacity to tolerate biotic and abiotic stress, resulting in a high yield stability and an intermediate yield level under a low input agricultural system."
The terms autochthonous and allochthonous are most often applied to plants, with animals more often being referred to as indigenous or native. Examples of references in sources to long-term local landraces of livestock include constructions such as "indigenous landraces of sheep", and "Leicester Longwool sheep were bred to the native landraces of the region". Some usage of autochthonous does occur in reference to livestock, e.g. "autochthonous races of cattle such as the Asturian mountain cattle – Ratina and Casina – and Tudanca cattle."
Biodiversity and conservation
A significant proportion of farmers around the world grow landrace crops. However, as industrialized agriculture spreads, cultivars, which are selectively bred for high yield, rapid growth, disease and drought resistance, and other commercial production values, are supplanting landraces, putting more and more of them at risk of extinction.
In 1927 at the International Agricultural Congress, organized by the predecessor of the FAO, an extensive discussion was held on the need to conserve landraces. A recommendation that members organize nation-by-nation landrace conservation did not succeed in leading to widespread conservation efforts.
Landraces are often free from many intellectual property and other regulatory encumbrances. However, in some jurisdictions, a focus on their production may result in missing out on some benefits afforded to producers of genetically selected and homogenous organisms, including breeders' rights legislation, easier availability of loans and other business services, even the right to share seed or stock with others, depending on how favorable the laws in the area are to high-yield agribusiness interests.
As Regine Andersen of the Fridtjof Nansen Institute (Norway) and the Farmers' Rights Project puts it, "Agricultural biodiversity is being eroded. This trend is putting at risk the ability of future generations to feed themselves. In order to reverse the trend, new policies must be implemented worldwide. The irony of the matter is that the poorest farmers are the stewards of genetic diversity." Protecting farmer interests and protecting biodiversity is at the heart of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (the "Plant Treaty" for short), under the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), though its concerns are not exclusively limited to landraces.
Landraces played a basic role in the development of the standardized breeds but are today threatened by the market success of the standardized breeds. In developing countries, landraces still play an important role, especially in traditional production systems. Specimens within an animal landrace tend to be genetically similar, though more diverse than members of a standardized or formal breed.
In situ and ex situ landrace conservation
- in situ where the landrace is grown and conserved by farmers on farms.
- ex situ where the landrace is conserved in an artificial environment such as a gene-bank, using controls such as laminated packets kept frozen at −18 °C (0 °F).
As the amount of agricultural land dedicated to growing landrace crops declines, such as in the example of wheat landraces in the Fertile Crescent, landraces can become extinct in cultivation. Therefore ex situ landrace conservation practices are considered a way to avoid losing the genetic diversity completely. Research published in 2020 suggested that existing ways of cataloging diversity within ex situ genebanks fall short of cataloging the appropriate information for landrace crops.
Preserving cereal landraces
Preservation efforts for cereal strains are ongoing including in situ and in online-searchable germplasm collections (seed banks), coordinated by Biodiversity International and the National Institute of Agricultural Botany (NIAB, UK). However, more may need to be done, because plant genetic variety, the source of crop health and seed quality, depends on a diversity of landraces and other traditionally used varieties. Efforts (as of 2008[update]) were mostly focused on Iberia, the Balkans, and European Russia, and dominated by species from mountainous areas. Despite their incompleteness, these efforts have been described as "crucial in preventing the extinction of many of these local ecotypes".
An agricultural study published in 2008 showed that landrace cereal crops began to decline in Europe in the 19th century such that cereal landraces "have largely fallen out of use" in Europe. Landrace cultivation in central and northwest Europe was almost eradicated by the early 20th century, due to economic pressure to grow improved, modern cultivars. While many in the region are already extinct, some have survived by being passed from generation to generation, and have also been revived by enthusiasts outside Europe to preserve European agriculture and food culture elsewhere. These survivals are usually for specific uses, such as thatch, and traditional European cuisine and craft beer brewing.
This section needs expansion with: links to articles on specific botanical landraces. You can help by adding to it. (August 2014)
Plant landrace development
The label landrace includes regional cultigens that are genetically heterogeneous, but with enough characteristics in common to permit their recognition as a group. These characteristics are used by farmers to manage diversity and purity within landraces.
In some cultures, development of new landraces is typically limited to members of specific social groups, such as women or shaman. Maintaining existing landraces, like developing new landraces, requires that farmers be able to identify crop-specific characteristics and that those characteristics are passed on to following generations.
Over time, the process of identifying the distinguishing characteristic or characteristics of a new landrace is reinforced by cultivation processes; for example, descendants of a plant that is notably drought tolerant may become iteratively more so through selective breeding as farmers regard it as better for dry areas and prioritize planting it in those locations. This is one way in which farming systems can develop a portfolio of landraces over time that have specific ecological niches and uses.
Although landraces are often discussed once they have become endemic to a particular geographical region, landraces have always been moved over long and short distances. Some landraces can adapt to various environments, while others only thrive within specific conditions. Self-fertilizing and vegetatively populated species adapt by changing the frequencies of phenotypes. Outbreeding crops absorb new genotypes through intentional and unintentional hybridization, or through mutation.
Cultivars developed from landraces
|Lakota squash||Cucurbita maxima||Nebraska||Developed from a squash landrace grown by Native Americans living along the Missouri Valley along with germplasm from Hubbard squash or a similar cultivar|
|Maruti[disambiguation needed]||Cajanus cajan|
Examples of plant landraces
|Khandahar Pendi||Abelmoschus esculentus||Afghanistan||Has green, red, pink, or white pods that have a variety of shapes and sizes.|
|Acorazado, Acorazonado, Queen of Malinalco, Reina de Malinalco||Physalis ixocarpa||Malinalco||The name translates as "heart shaped", reflecting morphology which has also been described as "pointed or torpedo shaped", which is unusual for a tomatillo. The tomatillos taste fruity and sweet.|
|Jumli Marshi||Nepal||A cold-tolerant and popular rice landrace grown in mountain ecosystems. An evolutionary plant breeding program was used to increase its resistance to blast disease while maintaining landrace diversity.|
|Berrettina di Lungavilla||Cucurbita maxima||Po river floodplain, Italy||From the Po floodplain in Northern Italy that nearly went extinct|
|Cappello da prete|
|Plato kuum, cmejen kuum, calabacita kuum, xplato, ’kuum||Likely Cucurbita moschata||Yucatán, Mexico||Squash with 'pepita menuda' (Spanish) meaning 'thin seeds' Known as the 'little sister' to Cucurbita moschata Xnuk kuum. Xplato (Mayan-Spanish) literally translates to flat plate. Used for making a sweet called calabaza melada.|
|Candy roaster||Cucurbita maxima|
|Nanticoke squash||Cucurbita maxima||Maryland and Delaware||Cultivated by the Nanticoke (or Kuskarawaok) people, one of the southernmost groups in the Algonquin language family, who lived in the area now known as Maryland and Delaware during the American colonial period when Cucurbita maxima arrived in North America. The wide diversity of the fruit reflects the genetic diversity of the landrace.|
|Seminole Pumpkin||Cucurbita moschata||Florida||A landrace originally cultivated by the Seminole people of what is now Florida. Naturalists recorded Seminole pumpkins hanging from trees in the 18th century.|
|Cacho de cabra||Capsicum anuum||Maule region of Chile||Considered to be the most popular in the region of Maule|
|Chileno negro||Capsicum baccatum||Maule region of Chile|
|Chimayó pepper||Chimayó, New Mexico||Considered the most well known of the New Mexico chile landraces|
|Santo Domingo Pueblo chili||Santo Domingo Pueblo||An early-maturing landrace from the pueblo that served as a headquarters for Spanish colonial missions as well as a key location of resistance against the Spanish settlers in the 1600s.|
|Coeur de bue tomato|
|San Marzano tomato|
Animal landrace development
Some standardized animal breeds originate from attempts to make landraces more consistent through selective breeding, and a landrace may become a more formal breed with the creation of a breed registry or publication of a breed standard. In such a case, one may think of the landrace as a "stage" in breed development. However, in other cases, formalizing a landrace may result in the genetic resource of a landrace being lost through crossbreeding.
While many landrace animals are associated with farming, other domestic animals have been put to use as modes of transportation, as companion animals, for sporting purposes, and for other non-farming uses, so their geographic distribution may differ. For example, horse landraces are less common because human use of them for transport has meant that they have moved with people more commonly and constantly than most other domestic animals, reducing the incidence of populations locally genetically isolated for extensive periods of time.
Examples of animal landraces
Many standardized breeds have rather recently (within a century or less) been derived from landraces. Examples, often called natural breeds, include Arabian Mau, Egyptian Mau, Korat, Kurilian Bobtail, Maine Coon, Manx, Norwegian Forest Cat, Siberian, and Siamese.
|Thai||Thailand||The ancestor of the Siamese cat breed, among many others.|
|Van cat||Turkey||The Van cat of modern-day Turkey is a landrace of symbolic and (disputed) cultural value to Turks, Armenians and Kurds.|
|Icelandic cattle||Iceland||As a population dating from the era of Icelandic settlement they are likely the oldest cattle landrace in Europe, owing to their genetic isolation for most of that time.|
|Yakutian cattle||Sakha Republic, Russian Federation||Noted as the northernmost cattle landrace, and the most genetically dissimilar to other cattle. This group of cattle may represent a fourth Aurochs domestication event (and a third event among Bos taurus–type aurochs) and may have diverged from the Near East group some 35,000 years ago. Yakutian cattle are the last remaining native Turano-Mongolian cattle breed in Siberia, and one of only a few pure Turano-Mongolian breeds remaining worldwide. Studies of autosomal DNA markers show a high genetic distinctiveness and point to a long-term genetic isolation from other breeds; geographic isolation beyond the normal northern limit of the species range can be assumed to be the cause.|
Dog landraces and the selectively bred dog breeds that follow breed standards vary widely depending on their origins and purpose. Landraces are distinguished from dog breeds which have breed standards, breed clubs and registries.
Landrace dogs have more variety in their appearance than do standardized dog breeds. An example of a dog landrace with a related standardized breed with a similar name is the collie. The Scotch Collie is a landrace, while the Rough Collie and the Border Collie are standardized breeds. They can be very different in appearance, though the Rough Collie in particular was developed from the Scotch Collie by inbreeding to fix certain highly desired traits. In contrast to the landrace, in the various standardized Collie breeds, purebred individuals closely match a breed-standard appearance but might have lost other useful characteristics and have developed undesirable traits linked to inbreeding.
The ancient landrace dogs of the Fertile Crescent that led to the Saluki breed excels in running down game across open tracts of hot desert, but conformation-bred individuals of the breed are not necessarily able to chase and catch desert hares.
|Carolina Dog or Yellow dog||Developed from dogs originally from Asia this landrace has been the basis of the Carolina Dog standardized breed.|
|Scotch Collie||Scotland||The Rough Collie was bred from the Scotch Collie landrace.|
|St. John's water dog||Newfoundland, Canada||Served as the foundational stock for a number of purpose-bred dogs, such as the Labrador Retriever, Chesapeake Bay Retriever, Cape Shore Water Dog, and Newfoundland.|
Some standardized breeds that are derived from landraces include the Dutch Landrace, Swedish Landrace and Finnish Landrace goats. The Danish Landrace is a modern mix of three different breeds, one of which was a "Landrace"-named breed.
|British primitive goat||British Isles||Dates to the Neolithic era and possibly has existed as feral herds continuously since that time.|
|Icelandic goat||Iceland||Can be dated to the Icelandic Age of Settlement and the population is presumed to have been genetically isolated for nearly the entirety of that time period|
|Spanish goat||Spain||This landrace survives in larger numbers in the American South as the "brush goat" or "scrub goat", among other names than in Spain.|
|Shetland sheep||Shetland Isles, Scotland|
|Spælsau sheep||Norway||Dates to the Iron Age|
|Welsh mountain sheep||Wales|
This section needs expansion with: donkeys. You can help by adding to it. (August 2014)
The wild progenitor of the domestic horse is extinct. It is rare for landraces among domestic horses to remain isolated, due to human use of horses for transportation, thus causing horses to move from one local population to another.
The heavy 'draft' type of domestic horse, developed in Europe, has differentiated into many separate landraces or breeds. Examples of horse landraces also include insular poulations in Greece and Indonesia, and, on a broader scale, New World populations derived from the founder stock of Colonial Spanish horse.
|Shetland sheep||Shetland Isles, Scotland|
|Spælsau sheep||Norway||Dates to the Iron Age|
|Welsh mountain sheep||Wales|
This section needs expansion with: More examples. You can help by adding to it. (August 2014)
The standardized swine breeds named "Landrace" are often not actually landraces or derived from landraces. The Danish Landrace pig breed, pedigreed in 1896 from an actual local landrace, is the principal ancestor of the American Landrace (1930s). In this way, the Swedish Landrace is derived from the Danish and from other Scandinavian breeds, as is the British Landrace breed.
|Baudin pig||Kangaroo Island, South Australia||Once a feral landrace, it is now extinct in the wild.|
|Mulefoot pig||The Mulefoot pig originated as a landrace, but has been standardized since the early 1900s.|
|Swedish flower hen||Sweden|
|Danish landrace duck||Denmark||The modern Danish landrace duck is noted to be somewhat inbred.|
|Swedish Blue duck||Sweden||A modern breed of the same name is derived from the landrace.|
Many standardized goose breeds named "Landrace", e.g. the Twente Landrace goose, are not actually true landraces, but may be derived from them.
|Danish landrace goose||Denmark|
|Pilgrim goose||New England||This landrace is associated with the Mayflower Pilgrims of Plymouth Colony, and has also been standardised as a formal breed since 1939. It is thought to descend from western European stock dating of the 17th century.|
|Gotland rabbit||Gotland||This landrace is subject to conservation efforts.|
|Mellerud rabbit||Sweden||This landrace is subject to conservation efforts.|
- Deynze, Allen Van; Zamora, Pablo; Delaux, Pierre-Marc; Heitmann, Cristobal; Jayaraman, Dhileepkumar; Rajasekar, Shanmugam; Graham, Danielle; Maeda, Junko; Gibson, Donald; Schwartz, Kevin D.; Berry, Alison M.; Bhatnagar, Srijak; Jospin, Guillaume; Darling, Aaron; Jeannotte, Richard (2018-08-07). "Nitrogen fixation in a landrace of maize is supported by a mucilage-associated diazotrophic microbiota". PLOS Biology. 16 (8): e2006352. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006352. ISSN 1545-7885. PMC 6080747. PMID 30086128.
- Sponenberg, D. Phillip (May 18, 2000). "Genetic Resources and Their Conservation". In Bowling, Ann T.; Ruvinsky, Anatoly (eds.). The Genetics of the Horse. Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK: CABI Publishing. pp. 392–393. ISBN 978-0-85199-429-1. Retrieved September 28, 2014.
- Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. "Reviewing the Roles of Animal Genetic Resources and Options for Their Conservation" (PDF). In Vivo Conservation of Animal Genetic Resources. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines. UN Food and Agriculture Organization. pp. 4–5. ISSN 1810-0708.
- Jones, Huw; Lister, Diane L.; Bower, Mim A.; Leigh, Fiona J.; Smith, Lydia M.; Jones, Martin K. (August 2008). "Approaches and Constraints of Using Existing Landrace Material to Understand Agricultural Spread in Prehistory". Plant Genetic Resources. 6 (2): 98–112. doi:10.1017/S1479262108993138. S2CID 86662605. Archived from the original on 2008-05-14. Retrieved August 6, 2014. The copy at this URL is missing the author information but provides full text otherwise; that information is available in this official online abstract.
- Camacho Villa, Taina Carolina; Maxted, Nigel; Scholten, Maria; Ford-Lloyd, Brian (December 2005). "Defining and Identifying Crop Landraces". Plant Genetic Resources. 3 (3): 373–384. doi:10.1079/PGR200591. S2CID 5234510.
- Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. "Glossary of Selected Terms" (PDF). In Vivo Conservation of Animal Genetic Resources. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines. UN Food and Agriculture Organization. pp. xv–xx. ISSN 1810-0708.
- Zeven, A. C. (1998). "Landraces: A Review of Definitions and classifications". Euphytica. 104 (2): 127–139. doi:10.1023/A:1018683119237. S2CID 20631394. Abstract and first two pages are available for free access.
- Breton Olson, Meryl; Morris, Katlyn S.; Méndez, V. Ernesto (2012). "Cultivation of Maize Landraces by Small-scale Shade Coffee Farmers in Western El Salvador" (PDF). Agricultural Systems (111): 63–74.
- Andersen, Regine (April 2010). "An Issue of Survival". Development & Cooperation. Internationale Weiterbildung und Entwicklung. Archived from the original on 2011-09-27. Retrieved August 6, 2014.
- "Irish Landraces". Waterford, Ireland: National Biodiversity Data Centre. 2012. Archived from the original on 2014-01-02. Retrieved August 7, 2014.
- Harlan, J. R. (1975). Crops and Man. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America.[page needed]
- Friis-Hansen, Esbern; Sthapit, Bhuwon, eds. (2000). Participatory Approaches to the Conservation and Use of Plant Genetic Resources. Rome, Italy: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. p. 199. ISBN 978-92-9043-444-3.
- Harlan, Jack R. (1971). "Agricultural Origins: Centers and Noncenters: Agriculture May Originate in Discrete Centers or Evolve Over Vast Areas Without Definable Centers". Science. 174 (4008): 468–474. doi:10.1126/science.174.4008.468. JSTOR 1733521. PMID 17745730. S2CID 24239918.
- "Landrace". Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random House. 2014. Retrieved August 5, 2014. Based on the Random House Dictionary.
- Sponenberg, D. Phillip; Bixby, Donald E. (2007). Managing Breeds for a Secure Future: Strategies for Breeders and Breed Associations. Pittsboro, North Carolina: American Livestock Breeds Conservancy. pp. 8–10. ISBN 9781887316071.
- "The British Landrace: Breed History". BritishPigs.org.uk. Trumpington, Cambridgeshire, UK: British Pig Association. 2014. Retrieved 30 September 2014.
- Ramanandan, P. (1997). "Pigeonpea: Genetic Resources". In Nene, Y.L. (ed.). The Pigeonpea. Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK: CAB International (CABI). pp. 89–116.
- "Section B. Landraces: B.1. Introduction" (PDF). Resource Book for the Preparation of National Plans for Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives and Landraces. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2014. Retrieved August 6, 2014.[permanent dead link]
- Ramsay, K.; Smuts, M.; Els, H. C. (2000). "Adding Value to South African Landrace Breeds Conservation through Utilisation" (PDF). Animal Genetic Resources Information. 27 (27): 9–15. doi:10.1017/S1014233900001243.[permanent dead link]
- Simmons, Paula; Ekarius, Carol (2009) . ""Charollais"". Storey's Guide to Raising Sheep (New ed.). Storey Publishing. ISBN 9781603423908.
- "Picos de Europa". UNESCO.org. United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). April 2014.
- Ramirez-Villegas, Julian; Khoury, Colin K.; Achicanoy, Harold A.; Mendez, Andres C.; Diaz, Maria Victoria; Sosa, Chrystian C.; Debouck, Daniel G.; Kehel, Zakaria; Guarino, Luigi (2020). "A gap analysis modelling framework to prioritize collecting for ex situ conservation of crop landraces". Diversity and Distributions. 26 (6): 730–742. doi:10.1111/ddi.13046. ISSN 1366-9516. JSTOR 26914952. S2CID 216486179.
- Andreani, L.; Camerini, G.; Delogu, C.; Fibiani, M.; Lo Scalzo, R.; Manelli, E. (2022-03-01). "How to save a landrace from extinction: the example of a winter squash landrace (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne) in Northern Italy (Lungavilla-Pavia)". Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 69 (3): 1163–1178. doi:10.1007/s10722-021-01294-2. ISSN 1573-5109. S2CID 244432667.
- Bonjean, Alain P.; Angus, William J., eds. (2001). The World Wheat Book: A History of Wheat Breeding. Vol. 1. Paris, France: Lavoisier/Intercept. ISBN 978-1898298724.[page needed]
- Gibson, Richard W. (2009). "A Review of Perceptual Distinctiveness in Landraces Including an Analysis of How Its Roles Have Been Overlooked in Plant Breeding for Low-Input Farming Systems". Economic Botany. 63 (3): 242–255. doi:10.1007/s12231-009-9086-3. ISSN 0013-0001. JSTOR 27807238. S2CID 41869355.
- Coyne, Dermot; Reiser, J. M.; Sutton, Lisa; Graham, Alice (1995-01-01). "'Lakota' Winter Squash, A Cultivar Derived from Native American Sources in Nebraska". Agronomy & Horticulture - Faculty Publications.
- Dwivedi, Sangam; Goldman, Irwin; Ortiz, Rodomiro (August 2019). "Pursuing the Potential of Heirloom Cultivars to Improve Adaptation, Nutritional, and Culinary Features of Food Crops". Agronomy. 9 (8): 441. doi:10.3390/agronomy9080441. ISSN 2073-4395.
- Roach, Margaret (2022-01-13). "Where Adventurous Gardeners Buy Their Seeds". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2022-12-26.
- "The Queen of Tomatillos: Reina de Malinalco". Masa Americana. 2022-07-25. Retrieved 2022-12-26.
- Joshi, B. K.; Ayer, D. K.; Gauchan, D.; Jarvis, D. (2020-10-13). "Concept and rationale of evolutionary plant breeding and its status in Nepal". Journal of Agriculture and Forestry University: 1–11. doi:10.3126/jafu.v4i1.47023. ISSN 2594-3146. S2CID 231832089.
- Lope-Alzina, Diana Gabriela (March 2007). "Gendered production spaces and crop varietal selection: Case study in Yucatán, Mexico: Gendered production spaces and varietal selection, Yucatán". Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography. 28 (1): 21–38. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9493.2006.00274.x.
- Castetter, Edward F. (1930). "Species Crosses in the Genus Cucurbita". American Journal of Botany. 17 (1): 41–57. doi:10.2307/2446379. ISSN 0002-9122. JSTOR 2446379.
- "Seminole Pumpkin". ECHOcommunity. Retrieved 2022-12-26.
- Muñoz-Concha, Diego; Quiñones, Ximena; Hernández, Juan Pablo; Romero, Sebastián (October 2020). "Chili Pepper Landrace Survival and Family Farmers in Central Chile". Agronomy. 10 (10): 1541. doi:10.3390/agronomy10101541. ISSN 2073-4395.
- "The Landrace Chiles of Northern New Mexico". New Mexico State University. Retrieved 2022-12-26.
- Baldina, Svetlana; Picarella, Maurizio E.; Troise, Antonio D.; Pucci, Anna; Ruggieri, Valentino; Ferracane, Rosalia; Barone, Amalia; Fogliano, Vincenzo; Mazzucato, Andrea (2016). "Metabolite Profiling of Italian Tomato Landraces with Different Fruit Types". Frontiers in Plant Science. 7: 664. doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00664. ISSN 1664-462X. PMC 4872001. PMID 27242865.
- "Florida Cracker and Pineywoods Cattle". Hobby Farms. 2012. Retrieved May 25, 2012.
- Tapio, Ilma; Tapio, Miika; Li, Meng-Hua; Popov, Ruslan; Ivanova, Zoya; Kantanen, Juha (13 July 2010). "Estimation of relatedness among non-pedigreed Yakutian cryo-bank bulls using molecular data: implications for conservation and breed management". Genetics Selection Evolution. 42 (1): 28. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-42-28. PMC 2909159. PMID 20626845.
- Kantanen, J.; Edwards, C. J.; Bradley, D. G.; Viinalass, H.; Thessler, S.; Ivanova, Z.; Kiselyova, T.; Ćinkulov, M.; Popov, R.; Stojanović, S.; Ammosov, I.; Vilkki, J. (2009). "Maternal and paternal genealogy of Eurasian taurine cattle (Bos taurus)". Heredity. Nature Portfolio (The Genetics Society). 103 (5): 404–415. doi:10.1038/hdy.2009.68. PMID 19603063.
- Hideyuki Mannen; et al. (August 2004). "Independent mitochondrial origin and historical genetic differentiation in North Eastern Asian cattle" (PDF). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 32 (2): 539–544. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2004.01.010. PMID 15223036. Retrieved 8 July 2013.
- Juha Kantanen (30 December 2009): ″Article of the month – The Yakutian cattle: A cow of the permafrost.″ Archived 2020-03-10 at the Wayback Machine GlobalDiv Newsletter, 2009, issue no. 12, pp. 3–6. 1 picture. Retrieved 30 June 2013.
- genomic-resources ENAC (14 August 2012): ″Success case study – Yakutian Cattle in the land of permafrost.″ 1 picture. Retrieved 30 June 2013.
- Lord, Kathryn; Coppinger, Lorna; Coppinger, Raymond (2013). Grandin, Temple; Deesing, Mark J. (eds.). Differences in the Behavior of Landraces and Breeds of Dogs. Genetics and the Behavior of Domestic Animals (2nd ed.). Academic Press. pp. 195–235. ISBN 9780124055087. Retrieved August 13, 2014.
- Dohner, Jan (December 6, 2013). "Choosing a Livestock Guard Dog Breed, Part Two". Mother Earth News. Archived from the original on 2014-08-14. Retrieved August 13, 2014.
- Ward, Andy. "Landrace vs. Purebred Scotch Collies". Old-Time Farm Shepherd: Dedicated to Bringing Back the Old Scotch Collie of Yesterday. Old-time Scotch Collie Association.
- Van Asch, Barbara; Zhang, Ai-bing; Oskarsson, Mattias; Klütsch, Cornelya; Amorim, António; Savolainen, Peter (May 10, 2012). "MtDNA Analysis Confirms Early Pre‐Columbian Origins of Native American Dogs". KTH Publication Database DiVA. Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Retrieved July 10, 2013.
- Bonnie Lou Hendricks (1995), International encyclopedia of horse breeds, University of Oklahoma Press, ISBN 978-0-8061-2753-8, retrieved 2009-04-20
- "Den danske landand [The Danish landrace duck]" (in Danish). Foreningen gamle danske husdyrracer. Retrieved 21 April 2015.
- Nabhan, Gary Paul (April 2008). Renewing America's Food Traditions: Saving and Savoring the Continent's Most Endangered Foods. White River Junction, Vermont: Chelsea Green. ISBN 9781933392899. Retrieved 7 August 2014.