Daniel 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Daniel 2
Songe Nabuchodonosor statue.jpg
Nebuchadnezzar's dream: the composite statue (France, 15th century)
Book Book of Daniel
Bible part Old Testament
Order in the Bible part 27
Category Ketuvim

Daniel 2 (the second chapter of the Book of Daniel) tells how Daniel interpreted a dream of Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon. The king saw a gigantic statue made of four metals, from its gold head to its feet of mingled iron and clay; as he watched, a stone "not cut by human hands" destroyed the statue and became a mountain filling the whole world. Daniel explained to the king that the statue represented four successive kingdoms beginning with Babylon, while the stone and mountain signified a kingdom established by God which would never be destroyed nor given to another people. (The dream and its interpretation are given in verses 31-45). Nebuchadnezzar then acknowledges the supremacy of Daniel's God and raises him to high office in Babylon.[1]

The book of which he is the hero divides into two parts, a set of tales in chapters 1–6, and the series of visions in chapters 7–12,[2] the tales no earlier than the Hellenistic period, and the visions from the Maccabean era (the mid-2nd century BCE).[3] Chapter 2 in its present form dates from no earlier than the first decades of the Seleucid empire (late 4th/early 3rd centuries BCE), but its roots may reach back to the fall of Babylon and the rise of the Persian Achaemenid empire.[4]

The overall theme of the Book of Daniel is God's sovereignty over history.[5] On the human level Daniel is set against the Babylonian magicians who fail to interpret the king's dream, but the cosmic conflict is between the god of Israel and the false Babylonian gods.[6] What counts is not Daniel's human gifts, nor his education in the arts of divination, but "Divine Wisdom" and the power that belongs to God alone, as Daniel indicates when he urges his companions to seek God's mercy for the interpretation of the king's dreams.[7]

Summary[edit]

In the second year of his reign Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon, is troubled by a dream. He summons his magicians and astrologers to interpret it, but demands that they first tell him what the dream was. They protest that no man can do such a thing, and Nebuchadnezzar orders that they all be executed. This decree also falls on Daniel, but he, through the agency of his God, is able to tell the king the dream. It was a dream of a great statue with a head of gold, arms and chest of silver, belly and thighs of bronze, legs of iron, and feet of mingled iron and clay. A great stone, not cut by human hands, fell on the feet of the statue and destroyed it, and the rock became a mountain that filled the whole world. Daniel then interprets the dream: it concerns four successive kingdoms, beginning with Nebuchadnezzar, which will be replaced by the everlasting kingdom of the God of heaven. Nebuchadnezzar affirms that Daniel's god is "the God of gods and Lord of kings and revealer of mysteries." He lavishes gifts on Daniel and makes him chief of all the wise men and ruler over the province of Babylon.[1]

Composition and structure[edit]

Book of Daniel[edit]

It is generally accepted that the Book of Daniel originated as a collection of folktales among the Jewish community in Babylon and Mesopotamia in the Persian and early Hellenistic periods (5th to 3rd centuries BCE), expanded in the Maccabean era (mid-2nd century) by the visions in chapters 7-12.[8] Modern scholarship agrees that Daniel is a legendary figure;[3] it is possible that this name was chosen for the hero of the book because of his reputation as a wise seer in Hebrew tradition.[9] The tales are in the voice of an anonymous narrator, except for chapter 4 which is in the form of a letter from king Nebuchadnezzar.[10] Chapters 2-7 are in Aramaic (after the first few lines of chapter 2 in Hebrew,) and are in the form of a chiasmus, a poetic structure in which the main point or message of a passage is placed in the centre and framed by further repetitions on either side:[11]

  • A. (2:4b-49) – A dream of four kingdoms replaced by a fifth
    • B. (3:1–30) – Daniel's three friends in the fiery furnace
      • C. (4:1–37) – Daniel interprets a dream for Nebuchadnezzar
      • C'. (5:1–31) – Daniel interprets the handwriting on the wall for Belshazzar
    • B'. (6:1–28) – Daniel in the lions' den
  • A'. (7:1–28) – A vision of four world kingdoms replaced by a fifth

Daniel 2[edit]

Daniel 2 forms a chiasmus within the larger structure of Daniel 2-7:[12]

  • A. Introduction (v.1)
    • B. The king and his unwise courtiers (vv.2-12)
      • C. Daniel and Arioch (vv.13-16)
        • D. Daniel and his friends pray to God (vv.17-23)
      • C'. Daniel and Arioch (vv.24-25)
    • B'. The king and Daniel, the wise courtier (vv.26-47)
  • A'. Result (vv.48-49)

Chapter 1 and the first few lines of chapter 2 are in Hebrew, but in verse 4 the text says, in Hebrew, "Then the Chaldeans spoke to the king in Aramaic," and the book then continues in Aramaic until the end of chapter 7, where it switches back to Hebrew. No convincing explanation for this has been put forward.[13]

Chapter 2 in its present form dates from no earlier than the first decades of the Seleucid empire (late 4th/early 3rd centuries BCE), but its roots may reach back to the fall of Babylon and the rise of the Persian Achaemenid empire, and some scholars have speculated that the dream of four kingdoms was originally a dream of four kings, Nebuchadnezzar and his four successors.[4] The lack of linguistic continuity (the switch from Hebrew to Aramaic at verse 4), and of continuity with other parts of Daniel (e.g., the king needs an introduction to Daniel despite having interviewed him at the completion of his training in Daniel 1:18), as well as various instances of repetitiveness (see verses 28-30), are sometimes cited as evidence that later hands have edited the story, or as signs that the author was working from multiple sources.[14]

Genre and themes[edit]

Daniel interprets Nebuchadnezzar's Dream

Genre[edit]

The Book of Daniel is an apocalypse, a literary genre in which a heavenly reality is revealed to a human recipient; such works are characterized by visions, symbolism, an other-worldly mediator, an emphasis on cosmic events, angels and demons, and pseudonymity (false authorship).[15] Apocalypses were common from 300 BCE to 100 CE, not only among Jews and Christians, but Greeks, Romans, Persians and Egyptians.[16] Daniel, the book's hero, is a representative apocalyptic seer, the recipient of the divine revelation: has learned the wisdom of the Babylonian magicians and surpassed them, because his God is the true source of knowledge; he is one of the maskil, the wise, whose task is to teach righteousness.[16] The book is also an eschatology, meaning a divine revelation concerning the end of the present age, a moment in which God will intervene in history to usher in the final kingdom.[17]

Daniel 2 exhibits both these genres, but it is also made up numerous subgenres: a court tale, a dream report, a legend, an aretalogy, a doxology, and a midrash.[14] In folkloric terms it can be typifiied as a "court legend," a story set in the royal court, concerned with wonderful events and containing an edifying message.[18] The plot of such tales (another example is the story of Joseph and Pharaoh in Genesis 41) is as follows: a person of low status is called before a person of high status to answer a difficult question or to solve a riddle; the high-status person poses the problem but none present can solve; the person of low status solves it and is rewarded.[19]

Themes[edit]

The overall theme of the Book of Daniel is God's sovereignty over history,[5] and the theme of the tales in chapters 1-6 is that God is sovereign over all earthly kings.[20] In Daniel 2 these two merge, and the claim of God's sovereignty extends beyond the immediate story to take in all of history.[20] On the human level Daniel is set against the Babylonian magicians who fail to interpret the king's dream, but the cosmic conflict is between the god of Israel and the false Babylonian gods.[6] What counts is not Daniel's human gifts, nor his education in the arts of divination, but "Divine Wisdom" and the power that belongs to God alone, as Daniel indicates when he urges his companions to seek God's mercy for the interpretation of the king's dreams.[7]

Interpretation[edit]

Daniel intercedes with Arioch.

Overview: dreams in the ancient world[edit]

In the ancient world, dreams, especially those of kings, were regarded as portents.[21] An inscription of the historic Babylonian king Nabonidus, for example, tells of a dream he had of his great predecessor Nebuchadnezzar, mentioning a young man who appeared in the dream to reassure him that it was not an evil portent.[22] Giant figures were frequent in ancient dream records, and parallels can be drawn from Greek (Hesiod's Works and Days), Latin (Ovid's Metamorphosis) and the Persian Bahman Yasht.[23]

The king's behaviour implies a distrust of his court dream-interpreters, and sets the scene for his later celebration of Daniel's God. [21] The secret of Nebuchadnezzar's dream is called a "mystery," a term found in the scrolls from Qumran indicating a secret that can be learned through divine wisdom; appropriately, Daniel receives the divine wisdom as a "vision of the night", a dream.[24] Daniel 2:20-23 emphasizes the Divine as a repository of wisdom and the controller of the destiny of kings; such hymns and prayers are typical of postexilic biblical narratives.[25] Finally Nebuchadnezzar prostrates himself before Daniel and commands that offerings and incense be offered to him, suggesting that he views Daniel as divine; nevertheless, although he acknowledges and respects the god of Daniel, he is not a convert.[26]

The four world kingdoms and the rock[edit]

Most scholars agree that the four world empires symbolised by the statue are Babylon (the head), the Medes (arms and shoulders), Persia (thighs and legs) and Seleucid Syria and Ptolemaic Egypt (the feet).[27] The concept of four successive world empires is drawn from Greek theories of mythological history, while the symbolism of the four metals is drawn from Persian writings.[28] The consensus among scholars is that the four beasts of chapter 7 symbolise the same four world empires.[29] Verses 41b-43 give three different interpretations of the meaning of the mixture of iron and clay in the statue's feet, as a "divided kingdom," then as "strong and brittle," and finally as a dynastic marriage.[18] The marriage might be to either of two between the Seleucids and the Ptolemies, the first in c.250 BCE and the second in 193.[30]

The following table shows the prophetic symbols and the empires they probably represent in the original historical context of the Daniel 2, compared with those in Daniel 7.

Chapter Historical Empires
Babylonian Empire Medean Empire Achaemenid Persian Empire Macedonian Empire
Daniel 2 Head of gold Chest and 2 arms of silver Belly and thighs of bronze 2 Legs of Iron (Empire of Alexander)
Feet of mixed iron and clay
(division of the empire among diadochi)
Daniel 7 Winged Lion Lopsided Bear 4 Headed/4 Winged
Leopard
Iron toothed beast
w/Little Horn

The symbolic significance of the stone which destroys the statue and becomes a mountain evokes biblical imagery of God as the "rock" of Israel, Zion as a mountain rising above all others, and God's glory filling the whole world. Images from the Book of Isaiah seem to be especially favoured. Whether the author was conscious of it or not, the image of the shattered statue blown away in the wind like chaff from the threshing floor brings to mind Isaiah 41:14-15 where Israel is a threshing sled that turns mountains into chaff, and the rock itself reflects the address to the Judean exiles in Isaiah 51:1, "look to the rock from which you were hewn."[31]

Modern Christian millennialism[edit]

William Miller, advocate of Adventist millennialism.

Christian historicism is a method of interpretation in Christian eschatology which associates bible prophecy with actual historical events and identifies symbolic beings with historical persons or societies, resulting in a progressive and continuous fulfillment of prophecy.

The following table lists biblical scholars from the 1st to the 19th centuries who used the Historicist methodology to interpret the vision.

The table link above supports the fact that most commentators throughout Christian history consider Rome to be the 4th kingdom, as far back as Jerome [38] and as recently as the NASB Study Bible[39].

The fourth kingdom being Rome is in agreement with Sir Isaac Newton who spent many years of his life studying the bible and comparing prophecies to history especially the prophecies of Daniel, "Wikisource link to Part I Chap IV". Observations upon the Prophecies of Daniel. Wikisource. .

"But it has been the more received opinion that it is the Roman monarchy that is here intended, because it was in the time of that monarchy, and when it was at its height, that the kingdom of Christ was set up in the world by the preaching of the everlasting gospel. The Roman kingdom was strong as iron (v. 40), witness the prevalency of that kingdom against all that contended with it for many ages. That kingdom broke in pieces the Grecian empire and afterwards quite destroyed the nation of the Jews. Towards the latter end of the Roman monarchy it grew very weak, and branched into ten kingdoms, which were as the toes of these feet. Some of these were weak as clay, others strong as iron, v. 42. Endeavours were used to unite and cement them for the strengthening of the empire, but in vain: They shall not cleave one to another, v. 43."[40]

Daniel "2:40 And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron: forasmuch as iron breaketh in pieces and subdueth all [things]: and as iron that breaketh all these, shall it break in u pieces and bruise. (u) That is, the Roman empire will subdue all these others, which after Alexander were divided into the Macedonians, Grecians, Syrians, and Egyptians."[41]

“The arms of the republic, sometimes vanquished in battle, always victorious in war, advanced with rapid steps to the Euphrates, the Danube, the Rhine, and the Ocean; and the images of gold, or silver, or brass, that might serve to represent the nations and their kings, were successively broken by the iron monarchy of Rome.”[42].

Adventist interpretations[edit]

Groups derived from the Adventist movement follow the Historicist interpretation of the statue, which they inherited from the Millerite movement, with the same identities attributed for the gold head, silver breast and arms, copper belly and thighs and the iron legs, as well as the rock representing the establishment of God's kingdom. However, specific interpretations about the feet and toes, in reference to more recent governments, vary among denominations.

Seventh-day Adventists interpret the non-durable iron and clay mixture as the many short-lived attempts throughout European history to form a large empire such as the Holy Roman Empire, Napoleonic France, Nazi Germany, The European Union. Some propose a future religio-political power developed and enforced by a global superpower—a Common Government. The lateral symmetry of the image from the thighs downward is taken to represent the permanent cultural and religious division between West and East.

Chapter Parallel sequence of prophetic elements as understood by SDA Historicists[43][44]
Past Present Future
Daniel 2 Head
Gold
(Babylon)
Chest & 2 arms
Silver
(Media-Persia)
Belly and thighs
Bronze
(Greece)
2 Legs
Iron
(Western Roman Empire &
Eastern Roman Empire)
Feet
Clay & Iron
(Frankish & Holy Roman Empires,
Ottoman Empire)
Toes
Clay & Iron
(Respective successors)
Rock
God's unending kingdom
left to no other people

In Jehovah's Witnesses' interpretation, the feet partly of iron and partly of clay represent the Anglo-American world power. They associate the feet with the Anglo-American world power: the special relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom. The mixture of iron-and-clay are said to represent traditional authoritarian rule uneasily coexisting with democratic rule and political fragmentation in the 'last days'. In particular, the clay is said to represent the common people having a say in how they are ruled during this time.[45][46]

Chapter Jehovah's Witnesses' interpretation
Past Present Future
Daniel 2 Head
Gold
(Babylon)
Chest & arms
Silver
(Media-Persia)
Belly and thighs
Bronze
(Greece)
Legs
Iron
(Roman Empire)
Feet & Toes
Clay & Iron
(Anglo-America; authoritarian and
democratic fragmentation)
Rock
God's unending kingdom
left to no other people

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon)[edit]

The story in Daniel 2 has significant meaning to members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, who believe that the true church was restored to the earth in the "latter days" through a modern prophet, Joseph Smith, in 1830. Like other Christians, the LDS church believes that the "stone cut out of the mountain without hands" is God's kingdom on the Earth, but unlike other Christians, they believe that it has already been established rather than at a future date.

Spencer Kimball explained in 1976, "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was restored in 1830. ...This is the kingdom, set up by the god of heaven, that would never be destroyed nor superseded, and the stone cut out of the mountain without hands that would become a great mountain and would fill the whole earth." Kimball agreed with the view of most Christians that the third kingdom represented that of Alexander the Great, the fourth represented the Roman Empire, and the feet of iron and clay represented a group of European nations, which were the great political powers at the time the Latter Day Saint movement was founded.[47][48]

Dead sea scrolls[edit]

The following Dead sea scrolls, discovered in the Judean desert, contain some passages in Daniel 2:[49][50][51]

  • 1QDana (2:2-6)[51]
  • 4QDana (2:9-11, 19-49)[51]

According to Eugene Ulrich, these two are the only Dead Sea Scrolls documents to contain the biblical text of Daniel 2.[52]

References[edit]

Citations[edit]

  1. ^ a b Seow 2003, p. 31-33.
  2. ^ Collins 2002, p. 2.
  3. ^ a b Collins 1984, p. 28.
  4. ^ a b Newsom & Breed 2014, p. 63-64.
  5. ^ a b Levine 2010, p. 1234.
  6. ^ a b Hill 2009, pp. 57–58.
  7. ^ a b Seow 2003, p. 37.
  8. ^ Collins 1984, p. 29,34-35.
  9. ^ Redditt 2009, pp. 176-177,180.
  10. ^ Wesselius 2002, p. 295.
  11. ^ Redditt 2009, p. 177.
  12. ^ Mangano 2001, p. 179.
  13. ^ Towner 1993, p. 150.
  14. ^ a b Hill 2009, p. 57.
  15. ^ Crawford 2000, p. 73.
  16. ^ a b Davies 2006, p. 397-406.
  17. ^ Carroll 2000, p. 420-421.
  18. ^ a b Collins 1984, p. 49.
  19. ^ Collins 1984, p. 49-50.
  20. ^ a b Newsom & Breed 2014, p. 63.
  21. ^ a b Levine 2010, p. 1235-1236, footnote 2.1-13.
  22. ^ Newsom & Breed 2014, p. 66-67.
  23. ^ Levine 2010, p. 1237-1238, footnote 2.31-35.
  24. ^ Levine 2010, p. 1236, footnote 2.14-19.
  25. ^ Levine 2010, p. 1237, footnote 2.20-23.
  26. ^ Levine 2010, p. 1238-1239, footnote 2.36-47.
  27. ^ Towner 1984, p. 34-36.
  28. ^ Niskanen 2004, p. 27,31.
  29. ^ Matthews & Moyer 2012, p. 260,269.
  30. ^ Collins 1984, p. 51.
  31. ^ Newsom & Breed 2014, p. 77.
  32. ^ After table in Froom 1950, pp. 456–7
  33. ^ After table in Froom 1950, pp. 894–5
  34. ^ After table in Froom 1948, pp. 528–9
  35. ^ After table in Froom 1948, pp. 784–5
  36. ^ After table in Froom 1946, pp. 252–3
  37. ^ After table in Froom 1946, pp. 744–5
  38. ^ Daniel 2:40 St. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel (1958). pp. 15-157, Translated by Gleason L. Archer
  39. ^ Daniel 2, 1971. Reuben A. Olson et al., New American Standard Bible. La Habra, California: Foundation Press Publications, publisher for the Lockman Foundation, 1971.
  40. ^ 1706, Matthew Henry's six volume Complete Commentary
  41. ^ 1560, Geneva Study Bible
  42. ^ Edward Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (1776-1788
  43. ^ Smith, U., 1944, Daniel and Revelation, Southern Publishing Association, Nashvill, TN
  44. ^ Anderson, A., 1975, Pacific PRess Pub. Assoc., Unfolding Daniel's Prophecies, Mountain View, CA
  45. ^ Insight on the Scriptures. 1. Watch Tower Society. p. 578. 
  46. ^ "How This World Will Come to an End". The Watchtower. September 15, 2012. 
  47. ^ The Stone Cut Without Hands, Spencer Kimball, Ensign, May 1976
  48. ^ Daniel Among the Babylonians Archived January 6, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.
  49. ^ VanderKam & Flint 2013, p. 423
  50. ^ New Light on the Book of Daniel from the Dead Sea Scrolls - Gerhard Hasel PhD. Associates for Biblical Research - Jul 31, 2012
  51. ^ a b c Dead sea scrolls - Daniel
  52. ^ Ulrich 2010, p. ix, 756-759.

Bibliography[edit]