New Orleans-class cruiser
|This article needs additional citations for verification. (December 2007)|
USS New Orleans (CA-32)
|Name:||New Orleans-class cruiser|
|Operators:||United States Navy|
|Preceded by:||Portland class|
|Succeeded by:||Wichita class|
|In commission:||15 February 1934 – 10 February 1947|
|Displacement:||9,950 long tons (10,110 t)|
|Length:||588 ft 2 in (179.27 m)|
|Beam:||61 ft 9 in (18.82 m)|
|Draft:||19 ft 5 in (5.92 m)|
|Propulsion:||4 × Parsons/Westinghouse geared turbines
8 × Babcock & Wilcox boilers
4 × screws
107,000 hp (79,800 kW)
|Speed:||32.7 knots (60.6 km/h; 37.6 mph)|
|Complement:||708 officers and enlisted|
5-inch barbettes (6.5-inch barbettes in CA 38)
The New Orleans class cruisers were a class of seven heavy cruisers built for the United States Navy (USN) in the 1930s. Originally called the Astoria-class cruiser, the class was renamed after Astoria was sunk and the surviving ships of the class underwent substantial reconstruction.
These ships participated in the heaviest surface battles of the Pacific War. Astoria, Quincy, and Vincennes were all sunk in the Battle of Savo Island, and three others were heavily damaged in subsequent battles in the Guadalcanal campaign. Only Tuscaloosa, the single ship of the class to spend most of World War II in the Atlantic, got through the war without being damaged. Collectively, ships of the class earned 64 battle stars.
The four surviving ships were laid up immediately after the end of the war, and sold for scrap in 1959.
The New Orleans class design was a test bed for innovations in cruiser design, which is why there were three distinct designs within this class.
- Design #1: New Orleans, Astoria, and Minneapolis.
- Design #2: Tuscaloosa and San Francisco.
- Design #3: Quincy and Vincennes.
This class was the direct ancestor for all subsequent USN gun cruisers. From them came the Brooklyn, Wichita, Cleveland, and the Baltimore class cruisers. While the Washington Naval Treaty was still being observed, new technology was implemented in the New Orleans class because the USN knew that if and when war came, they would need this knowledge to build ships (which were already in the planning stage) beyond the treaty limits. The USN came to the conclusion that no 10,000 ton cruiser could adequately perform the roles given.
Originally the USS Tuscaloosa (CA-37) was the lead ship of this class, but USS Astoria (CA-34), USS New Orleans (CA-32) and USS Minneapolis (CA-36), laid down as Portland-class ships, were reordered to the Tuscaloosa design in 1930; USS Portland (CA-33) and USS Indianapolis (CA-35) were being built in civilian rather than Navy yards and were completed as originally designed.
Three ships of the class (Astoria, Quincy, and Vincennes) were lost in the Battle of Savo Island in 1942. Immediately following the Guadalcanal Campaign the remaining ships of the class went through major overhauls in order to lessen top heaviness due to new electrical and radar systems (as well as more anti-aircraft weaponry) which was being added as technology advanced. In doing so, the ships took on a new appearance, most notably in the bridge area and became known as the New Orleans-class.
The four survivors were decommissioned shortly after the war ended, and scrapped in 1959–1961.
The seven ships of the New Orleans class were the penultimate US Navy cruisers, with the exception of the Wichita, to be built to the standards and limitations of the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922. Design of the new warships were begun in early 1929, based on the three preceding classes: The Pensacola, the Northampton and the Portland classes. All of the cruisers of the New Orleans class were outwardly similar but the displacement among these ships varied by some 600 tons. The Bureau of Construction and Repair authorized a contemporary 8 inches (200 mm) gun cruiser design of smaller size, but one which allocated considerably more tonnage towards protection. The New Orleans class was noteworthy for its protection. The hull was 12 feet (3.7 m) shorter than a Northampton, with a shorter armor belt that protected only the machinery and other internal spaces, allowing its thickness to be increased to 5 inches (130 mm). The machinery bulkheads were given 3.5 inches (89 mm) and the deck armor was strengthened to 2.5 inches (64 mm). For the first time in US cruisers, barbette and turret armor was sufficient to withstand 8-inch shellfire. The turrets were faced with 8 inches of armor, 2.75 inches (70 mm) on the sides and 1 inch (25 mm) on the roof. The barbettes were protected with 5 in of armor on all ships except the San Francisco, whose barbettes were fitted with 6.5 inches (170 mm) of armor.
Magazine protection was increased to 4 inches (100 mm). Magazine protection was further increased by placing them well below the waterline. Otherwise only an internal splinter belt and the armor deck protected the magazines. While this allowed an exceptional degree of armored protection for the vitals against shellfire, there was little protected hull volume, and the deep magazines were more exposed to underwater damage (The New Orleans learned this the hard way at the Battle of Tassafaronga). Protection represented approximately 15% of normal displacement as opposed to the only 5.6% in the Pensacolas and 6% in the Northampton and Portland classes. Unfortunately, fuel bunkerage had to be reduced, which resulted in a smaller operational range.
The main armament on the class centered on nine 8in/55 caliber Mark 14 guns (Mark 9 guns until replaced in WW2), mounted in triple turrets. The New Orleans was fitted with Mark 14 Mod 0 guns, the Minneapolis with the Mark 15 Mod 1 guns and the remaining ships of the class received Mark 12 Mod 0 guns. The turret face configurations were also different with the Mark 14 guns being housed in rounded face turrets and the Mark 12 and 15 guns in a flat faced turret. The 8in guns had a range of 31,700 yards (29,000 m) with a muzzle velocity of 2,800 feet per second (850 m/s). The armor piercing round weighed 260 pounds (120 kg) and could penetrate five inches of armor plating at 10,000 yards (9,000 m). Secondary armament for the class consisted of eight 5in/25 caliber dual purpose guns, which could be used against surface and aerial targets, as well as .50 caliber water-cooled machine guns to augment the 5in guns. When the US entered the war in December 1941, the New Orleans class and other "Treaty" cruisers were rushed into battle with little modification and lacking in air defense. The Japanese proved at Pearl Harbor that this war would be decided with air power. As soon as available, the quadruple 1.1in machine guns and the Swiss-designed 20 mm Oerlikon cannon (which would replace the .50 caliber guns) were fitted, as well as early radar units and fire control directors. As the war progressed, developments in radar abilities gave the Allies an increasingly decisive advantage over the enemy. Late 1942 saw the arrival of the Swedish 40 mm Bofors which was mounted in twin and quadruple mountings and would replace the quadruple 1.1-inch machine guns which proved ineffective. By late 1945, even after the removal of many non-essential items (half of their spotter planes as well as a crane and a catapult became non-essential due to advances in radar) the ships became dangerously over weight because of new weaponry and electrical and radar equipment. The threat from the air was so intense this condition had to be tolerated.
Appearance and performance
Outwardly, the New Orleans ships had a distinctive appearance and were considered very good looking vessels,though the 1942–43 refits of the surviving ships changed the appearance substantially. The forward superstructure had the bridge wings cut back, and all of the large size windows were plated in with just a few port holes taking their place. The open bridge above the wheel house was enlarged by 100 percent by extending it forward. In addition several gun tubs were created for the 40mm Bofors mounts both around the main mast, and aft. The forecastle deck extended back to the second funnel and the main superstructure was constructed without the ungainly tripod mast seen on the previous cruisers. The bow was a raked type, similar to those of British cruisers. The two funnels were situated closer together with a large search light tower in between. Aircraft handling facilities were moved further aft and a larger second conning station erected above the hangar. A single mainmast was erected there, between two huge pedestal cranes which handled both spotter planes and small craft. The main 8-inch turrets, although armored, were actually smaller with a more effective angular faceplate. By enlarging the forecastle deck, the secondary battery of 5-inch guns were mounted closer together, facilitating a more efficient ammunition delivery. Power was provided by eight Babcock and Wilcox high-pressure steam boilers that produced 107,000 hp (79,800 kW) for the four Westinghouse gearing steam turbines. The turbines were shafted to four screws, giving this class a rated speed of 33 knots (61 km/h). The cruisers' range – using 3,269 long tons (3,321 t) of bunker oil – was approximately 14,000 nautical miles (26,000 km) at 10 knots (19 km/h) or 5,280 nautical miles (9,780 km) at 20 knots (37 km/h). Their range could be extended by refueling from a tanker or another ship fitted to transfer oil while underway. The New Orleans cruisers performed peacetime exercises well with no serious shortcomings being found. While many changes were implemented to improve their performance and especially their protection, the 10,000 ton limit of the Washington Naval Treaty was not exceeded. The new cruisers were considered successful in their own right but could not be considered equal to some foreign contemporaries, which were often considerably larger.
Ships in class
|Ship Name||Hull No.||Builder||Commission–
|New Orleans||CA-32||New York Navy Yard||15 February 1934 – 10 February 1947|
|Astoria||CA-34||Puget Sound Naval Shipyard||28 April 1934 – Sunk, Battle of Savo Island 9 August 1942|
|Minneapolis||CA-36||Philadelphia Navy Yard||19 May 1934 – 10 February 1947|
|Tuscaloosa||CA-37||New York Shipbuilding Corporation, Camden, New Jersey||17 August 1934 – 13 February 1946|
|San Francisco||CA-38||Mare Island Navy Yard||10 February 1934 – 10 February 1946|
|Quincy||CA-39||Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Fore River Shipyard, Quincy, Massachusetts||9 June 1936 – Sunk, Battle of Savo Island 9 August 1942|
|Vincennes||CA-44||Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Fore River Shipyard, Quincy, Massachusetts||24 February 1937 – Sunk, Battle of Savo Island 9 August 1942|
World War II
For almost four years, the ships of the New Orleans class were assigned to the most urgent of front line duties, and thus, became involved in more than their share of deadly action. The Astoria, Quincy and Vincennes were quickly sunk in the Battle of Savo Island, 8 – 9 Aug 1942. Although three of their number were lost, the ships proved to be well designed. The New Orleans, Minneapolis and San Francisco were also seriously damaged in early war engagements in the Pacific. These engagements included the Naval Battle of Guadalcanal, in which the San Francisco engaged enemy ships at point blank range, and the Battle of Tassafaronga where the Minneapolis and the New Orleans took heavy damage and losses from Long-Lance torpedoes. Damage control work and skillful seamanship kept these ships afloat to continue to fight through the end of the war.
New Orleans class cruisers were found at every major naval skirmish of World War II in the Pacific despite the fact there were only four of the seven units remaining after the first year of war. They were some of the most used and hardest fought ships of the US Navy during the war. Three ships of this class were among the most decorated US ships of World War II. The San Francisco earned 17 Battle Stars and a Presidential Unit Citation, the New Orleans earned 17 Battle Stars, and the Minneapolis earned 17 Battle Stars as well. As a class, they earned a total of 64 Battle Stars and a Presidential Unit Citation.
- Fahey 1941 p. 9
- Wiper, Steve (2000). New Orleans Class Cruisers. Tucson, Az: Classic Warships Publishing. p. 58.
- Brown, Herbert C. (2001). Hell at Tassafaronga. Kearney, NE: Morris Publishing. p. 199.
- Wiper, Steve (2000). New Orleans Class Cruisers. Tucson, Az: Classic Warships Publishing. p. 58.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to New Orleans class cruiser.|
- Global Security.org – New Orleans class cruiser
- Global Security.org – New Orleans class cruiser specifications