Congestion pricing in New York City
Congestion pricing in New York City is a proposed traffic congestion fee for vehicles traveling into or within the Manhattan central business district of New York City. The congestion pricing charge was first proposed in 2007 as part of New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg's plan to improve the city's future environmental sustainability while planning for population growth, entitled PlaNYC 2030: A Greener, Greater New York.
If Bloomberg's plan had been approved and implemented, it would have been the first such fee scheme enacted in the United States. However, the proposal did not succeed, as it was never put to a vote in the New York State Assembly. Since then, there have been several similar proposals.
In the early 1970s, the office of New York City Mayor John Lindsay experimented with limiting and banning private cars in downtown Manhattan following federal pressure to improve city air quality. His original proposal, to ban noncommercial midday traffic in the financial district, was reduced to a parking ban at the request of business executives. The parking ban, announced in September 1970, affected a triangular 50-block area below Fulton Street and upset truckers and merchants. A later transportation commissioner said that the plans were fashionable and unfeasible due to unexamined commerce relationships and lack of preemptive buy-in from merchants. Lindsay's future proposals were restricted in scale.
In 1970, the government enacted new federal air pollution regulations. Since New York City was in violation of these new regulations, it was given until 1975 to be compliant; this was later pushed back to 1977 after the state was given a 2-year delay in implementing the standards. Mayor Lindsay and the federal Environmental Protection Agency developed a plan to collect tolls on twelve free bridges across the Harlem and East Rivers, banning midtown parking, and significantly reducing the number of parking spaces south of 59th Street. They also proposed to retrofit air filtering devices on cars entering New York City's main business districts. The successive mayor, Abraham Beame, refused to implement the plan, even after federal order in 1975, but environmentalists received a court order in 1976 to proceed with implementation. Yet as the federal legislature forbade the bridge tolls and taxi restrictions went into effect, the parking ban remained the most controversial and consequential aspect of the act, and its forced implementation was poorly executed. In April 1977, Beame's administration released a report that opposed the addition of tolls, a proposal that future Mayor Michael Bloomberg's congestion pricing plan would address thirty years later. The report supported a bill in the New York State Legislature that, if passed, would permanently ban tolls on the East River bridges. Although such a plan would generate revenue for the city, the administration concluded that tolling the free crossings would cause congestion and pollution without enticing drivers to use public transportation. The state departments of environment and transportation concurred with Beame's position, and in a May 1977 report, recommended that tolls not be enacted, despite the fact that the pollution standards had yet to be met.
Mayor Ed Koch too explored possibilities for a ban on private cars in 1979, only permitting mass transit, delivery, and emergency vehicles. The city's transportation commissioner said that limited bans on two streets in midtown Manhattan had been successful. The next year, Koch's office sought to ban single-occupancy cars from the East River bridges during weekday morning rush hour, but the State Supreme Court ruled that the City did not have that authority. Other actions, such as bicycle and bus lanes, reduction in parking spaces, and automobile inspections, were left in place. In 1981, the national administration deemed New York City in compliance with the federal air pollution regulations after a decade of noncompliance. Carbon monoxide levels decreased over the decade with improvements in car emissions. The number of cars inbound to Manhattan continued to rise and vehicle exhaust remained the top source of pollution in New York City.
Bloomberg's 2008 proposal
On December 12, 2006, Mayor Bloomberg announced his goals for long-term sustainability through the year 2030. On April 22, 2007 (Earth Day), PlaNYC 2030 was unveiled. Along with transportation initiatives, the plan outlined steps to clean up brownfields, create affordable housing, utilize open spaces, provide cleaner and more reliable and efficient energy sources, improve water quality and infrastructure, achieve cleaner air quality, and address climate change issues. The transportation initiatives support greater use of mass transit through various improvements and additions to transit infrastructure and services. In addition, the initiatives also include increased use of cycling, expanded ferry services, increased traffic violation enforcement, and installations of Muni Meters and an intelligent transportation system. Of the 16 proposed transportation initiatives in PlaNYC, the congestion pricing program is the only component that has to be approved by the New York State Legislature with financial support from the State;:33, 150 the remainder is within New York City's or its regional jurisdiction and is to be funded by a new Sustainable Mobility and Regional Transportation Financing Authority,:163 which would also take in revenue from the congestion fees, estimated at $380 million.:150
New York City applied to be part of the United States Department of Transportation's Urban Partnership Program, which would allocate money to cities that were willing to fight urban traffic congestion through tolling programs, express bus services or bus rapid transit, telecommuting, or technologies designed for the purpose. In June 2007, U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters said that out of the nine finalist cities applying for the program, New York City was the farthest along in its traffic reduction planning and the city was eligible for up to $500 million for funding the congestion pricing plan. Since the final funding decision would be announced in August, Peters wrote in a letter to Governor Eliot Spitzer that if state approval was not met by July 16, "it is unlikely that New York City would be selected."  Although a commitment was not established by that date, on July 19, the State legislature approved the creation of a 17-member commission that will study different plans to reduce traffic in the city, including congestion pricing. Signed by Spitzer on July 27, the bill authorized New York to apply for at least $200 million in federal funds.
On August 14, 2007, the U.S. Department of Transportation awarded from the Urban Partnership program $354 million to New York City. It was the largest of the five grants awarded to cities, which included San Francisco, King County, Washington (Seattle), the Minneapolis area, and Miami. Only $10.4 million is allocated for launching the congestion pricing program and $2 million for research. The rest of the grant will fund transportation infrastructure and services: $213.6 million to improve and build new bus depots, $112.7 million to develop bus rapid transit routes, and $15.8 million for expanded ferry services. The idea of congestion pricing was endorsed by Spitzer, Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno, and other New York City politicians, such as City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer, and Representative Joseph Crowley of Queens and the Bronx, as well as the U.S. Department of Transportation. Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and other politicians expressed skepticism about the plan, raising several questions about its viability, its environmental effects on neighborhoods bordering the congestion zone, the lack of state control in Bloomberg's proposal, and the imposition of a regressive tax on some commuters.
Bloomberg's proposal cited comparable congestion pricing in London, Singapore and Stockholm.:142 New York City's was to be a three-year pilot program, at the end of which the City and State would decide if the program should be made permanent.:150 Upon final legislative approval, the program could be put into effect within 18 months.
The proposed congestion pricing zone was defined as the island of Manhattan, bordered by the East and Hudson Rivers south of 60th Street. The northern border of the congestion zone was originally slated to be 86th Street, but this changed after the commission's recommendation released on January 10, 2008. Exempted roadways within the zone include the FDR Drive, New York Route 9A (West Side Highway and Henry Hudson Parkway included), the Battery Park Underpass, and the East River bridges (Queensboro Bridge, Williamsburg Bridge, Manhattan Bridge and Brooklyn Bridge) and their approaches. A free route from the East River bridges to the FDR Drive and from the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels to Route 9A would be designated.:143–144 Drivers who use toll crossings to or from the zone (e.g. Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel and Queens-Midtown Tunnel) would be charged the difference between the toll and the congestion charge.
The charge would apply on weekdays from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Proposed fees would be $8 for cars and commercial vehicles and $21 for trucks entering from outside the zone. Transit buses, emergency vehicles, taxis and for-hire vehicles, and vehicles with disabled parking plates would not be charged the fee. Taxi and livery trips that begin, end or touch the zone would have a $1 surcharge. Vehicles would be charged only once per day.:143–144
Operations for monitoring vehicles within the congestion zone will be barrier-free and includes E-ZPass transponders and a license plate recognition system that involves cameras. The system for monitoring congestion pricing will be made separate from existing red-light camera systems. Drivers would be able to pay by a debit from their E-ZPass account or a debit from a pre-paid non-EZPass account linked to the vehicle's license plate number. For drivers without traffic payment accounts, they would have 48 hours to pay via phone, the Internet, text messaging, or cash transactions at participating retailers.:143–144
The Campaign for New York's Future supported congestion pricing throughout the political discussion. They argued that the plan would reduce road congestion, shorten commutes, reduce air pollution, and raise funds for long-term mass transit upgrades. The Tri-State Transportation Campaign, a member of the Campaign for New York's Future, released an analysis of Census data showing that the vast majority (approximately 93–99%) of workers in the MTA service area, and in individual legislative districts, did not drive to work in Manhattan. TSTC stated that the data showed that congestion pricing was progressive policy.
Several other entities, including the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), the Partnership for New York City, and the New York League of Conservation Voters, supported the proposed congestion pricing. The MTA, in particular, would benefit from the proposal; its accelerated Capital Plan for 2008–2013 details transit investments that revenue from congestion pricing would pay for. These include 44 subway station rehabilitations, increased bus service, new Select Bus Service bus rapid transit in all 5 boroughs, $40 million for suburban park and ride facilities, Metro-North and LIRR station rehabilitations, third track work, East Side Access, Second Avenue Subway, and Fulton Center.
An August 2007 Quinnipiac University poll found that New York City voters opposed the plan 57% to 36%. Most of the opposition came from the outer boroughs, which with the exception of the Bronx would lose their toll-free access under the plan. On the other hand, 58% of voters would support the plan if the funds were used toward improving mass transit. A subsequent poll in March 2008 found that New York City voters supported Congestion Pricing by a margin of 67 percent to 27 percent if the money were used for mass transit improvements, and statewide voters supported the plan 60% to 30%, although the majority of New Yorkers were unaware that a $1 taxi surcharge was included in the plan. Then-presidential candidate Barack Obama, scores of city and state legislators, and community leaders openly expressed support for the plan.
New York State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver opposed the plan, citing several issues. Since motorists would want to avoid the congestion pricing zone, he claimed they would choose to park in neighborhoods just outside the pricing zone, in turn creating massive traffic jams and add more traffic and pollution to those neighborhoods. Silver also stated that because the plan would reduce traffic in Manhattan's central business district but not necessarily elsewhere, neighborhoods with high asthma rates such as Harlem, the South Bronx, and Bedford-Stuyvesant would not benefit. The installation of cameras for tracking purposes might have raised civil liberties concerns. Silver stopped short of opposing the entire plan, and said he would continue to work toward an agreement. Other opponents argued that the pricing could become a tax on middle- and lower-class residents, since those citizens would be affected the most financially. At the same time, higher-income commuters would not be turned off by paying the charges; thus the fee would not do much to discourage traffic into the congestion area.
In response to many of these issues, Bloomberg argued that a significant percentage of commuters would switch to public transportation, and most likely for all of their commute; thus cars would be taken off the road outside the Central Business District as well as within it. John Gallagher, a Bloomberg spokesman, also said that "toll shopping", a tendency for drivers to seek toll-free routes, will end as all commuters who go to the congestion zone will have to pay tolls.
On July 9, 2007 Assemblyman Richard Brodsky issued a report that called the proposal thoughtful and bold, but expressing skepticism on points including financial fairness and environmental impact. It mentioned as insufficiently studied alternatives (though it did not recommend any of them):
- Better traffic enforcement
- Time-of day pricing on mass transit
- Taxes on gasoline, payroll, commuter, or stock transfer
- Fees on City parking permits
Keep NYC Congestion Tax Free, a coalition of about 80 civic, business and labor organizations and businesses throughout the New York metropolitan area, proposed non-intrusive, low-cost traffic mitigation measures with some half billion dollars or more in incidental revenues as an alternative to the city's congestion pricing scheme that it argued would also qualify for the federal grant. It also recommended revenue measures that would raise nearly $1.8 billion to mass transit projects to induce less driving through better transit service.
Vote on proposal
On January 31, 2008, the New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission approved a plan for congestion pricing, which was passed by a vote of 13 to 2. Some changes over Mayor Bloomberg's original proposal were introduced, such as reducing the congestion zone, no charges for vehicles which stay within the zone, and a discount for low-emission trucks. The commission estimated that revenues from the congestion charge will generate $491 million a year, which would be committed to improve and expand the region's mass transit. The proposal was approved by the New York City Council on March 31, 2008 by a vote of 30 to 20. The only "No" votes came from Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island. Brooklyn and Queens strongly opposed the bill in the City Council, voting against it by a margin of nearly two to one; both boroughs, which are located on Long Island, become geographically isolated without access to free bridges as Manhattan and the Bronx block their access to the mainland.
Another alternative considered by the commission, and promoted by Assemblyman Richard Brodsky, was to restrict access into the congestion zone one day a week based on the last digits of the license plates. This sort of road space rationing system is currently practiced in two of the world's Top 10 megacities, São Paulo and Mexico City. Bloomberg's plan was endorsed by the then new Governor David Paterson, whose support was considered key to approving the bill in Albany.
The deadline to approve the plan by the State Assembly was April 7, 2008, for the city to be eligible to receive US$354 million in federal assistance for traffic congestion relief and mass transit improvements. On April 7, 2008, after a closed-door meeting, the Democratic Conference of the State Assembly decided not to vote on the proposal, "...the opposition was so overwhelming,...that he would not hold an open vote of the full Assembly," Sheldon Silver, the Assembly Speaker said. Afterwards, the USDOT announced that they will seek to allocate those funds to relief traffic congestion in other cities. Shortly thereafter, most of the federal grant that was to have gone to New York City was awarded to Chicago for bus-only lanes and more buses, and Los Angeles for high-occupancy toll lanes.
Coincidentally, by July 2008, gasoline prices of over $4.00 a gallon caused a dramatic 5 percent drop in vehicle trips into lower Manhattan, realizing goals that Bloomberg had envisioned for his congestion pricing scheme. This finding vindicated the plan's premise that higher driving costs would in fact reduce congestion, while at the same time rendering the plan unnecessary, at least while fuel prices stayed high.
Move NY, a 2015 proposal by former Traffic Commissioner Sam Schwartz, incorporates congestion pricing for central Manhattan and creates incentives to travel around, rather than through, Manhattan, such as tolling the East River bridges and reducing the tolls on outer bridges such as the Throggs Neck. The borough president of Queens, Melinda Katz, opposed the proposal.
As complaints about the city subway's delays and disrepair reached a fever pitch in summer 2017 under state governor Andrew Cuomo, he drafted a congestion pricing proposal with lessons from Bloomberg's handling of the State Legislature. Despite having earlier doubted such a plan's viability, Cuomo described congestion pricing as "an idea whose time has come". London and Stockholm had implemented the concept successfully. Cuomo's plan is expected to differ significantly from Bloomberg's proposal. Its primary intent is to raise funds for city transit and reduce street gridlock, while balancing suburban commuter considerations. The New York Times reflected that Bloomberg's 2008 proposal, which would have raised $500 million annually, could have rectified infrastructure issues and emergency repair schedule affecting the subway in 2017. The plan could be implemented through open road tolling, which records E-ZPass transponders and license plates without forcing the vehicles to slow down significantly, thus increasing vehicle throughput. This would coincide with MTA Bridges and Tunnels' ongoing project to convert all of its crossings from a tollbooth-based system to an open road tolling system. This was in contrast to the circumstances during Bloomberg's tenure, when open road tolling was not widely used yet. As with the Bloomberg proposal, Queens politicians still opposed Cuomo's proposal because it would potentially add tolls to the remaining free crossings over the East River.
Bloomberg's successor, Bill de Blasio, concurrently proposed a tax on wealthy residents to fund the subway, though a similar tax for universal prekindergarten had previously failed in the state legislature. He also clarified that he opposed Cuomo's plan because his Pre-K tax would be more effective in raising money. De Blasio's opposition came as some of his supporters in the 2017 mayoral election announced support for the plan, including the Working Families Party and Union Local 32BJ. Later in August 2017, it was clarified that de Blasio did not oppose congestion pricing specifically, and that his office was to look at any congestion pricing proposal by Cuomo's administration.
- London congestion charge
- Manchester congestion charge
- Milan Ecopass
- Road pricing
- Road space rationing
- San Francisco congestion pricing
- Singapore Area Licensing Scheme
- Singapore's ERP
- Stockholm congestion tax
- Smothers, Ronald (July 17, 1979). "Koch Considers Car Bans to cut Burning of Fuel". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
- Burks, Edward C. (September 10, 1970). "Lower Manhattan Parking Ban Is Ordered to Ease Congestion". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
- Within, Richard (1973-04-15). "SHIFT ON EMISSION MAY COST DRIVERS". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2017-08-29.
- Dembart, Lee (June 16, 1977). "Broad Parking Ban in Manhattan Begins as Mayor Yields to Ruling". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
- Weisman, Steven R. (August 6, 1977). "Beame, U.S. Reach an ‘Understanding’ on a Parking Ban". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
- Dembart, Lee (June 18, 1977). "Confusion on No‐Parking Ban". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
- Ranzal, Edward (1977-04-30). "Study Opposes Harlem and East River Bridge Tolls". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2017-08-28.
- Newman, Andy (2007-06-09). "Outside Manhattan, Many Oppose Congestion Plan". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- "The Case for Tolls". The New York Times. 1975-10-07. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2017-08-28.
- Treaster, Joseph B. (1977-05-04). "Despite U.S. Order, 2 State Units Oppose East River Bridge Tolls". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2017-08-28.
- Sulzberger, Jr., A. O. (September 15, 1981). "City Drops Proposal to Charge Bridge Tolls". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
- "MAYOR BLOOMBERG DELIVERS SUSTAINABILITY CHALLENGES AND GOALS FOR NEW YORK CITY THROUGH 2030" (Press release). New York City Mayor's Office. 2006-12-12. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- "MAYOR BLOOMBERG PRESENTS PLANYC: A GREENER, GREATER NEW YORK" (Press release). New York City Mayor's Office. 2007-04-22. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- "New York City Mobility Needs Assessment: 2007–2030" (PDF). PlaNYC 2030. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- Hakim, Danny; Rivera, Ray (2007-06-08). "City Traffic Pricing Wins U.S. and Spitzer’s Favor". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- United States Department of Transportation. "Urban Partnership Agreements". National Strategy to Reduce Congestion. Retrieved 2007-08-20.
- Arden, Patrick (2007-06-25). "Fight not over for traffic fee". Metro New York. Retrieved 2007-06-25.
- Hakim, Danny (2007-07-19). "Deal Is at Hand on Congestion Pricing". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-07-19.
- Schuster, Karla (2007-07-27). "New York lawmakers OK congestion pricing study". Newsday. Retrieved 2007-08-20.
- "U.S. Secretary of Transportation Names Five Communities to Receive Funding to Help Fight Traffic Congestion" (Press release). United States Department of Transportation. 2007-08-14. Retrieved 2007-08-20.
- Neuman, William (2007-08-15). "New York to Get U.S. Traffic Aid, but With Catch". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-08-20.
- Givens, Ann; James T. Madore (2007-08-15). "City gets federal grant to explore traffic plan". Newsday. Retrieved 2007-08-20.
- Confessore, Nicholas (2007-06-09). "In Legislators' Scrutiny, Traffic Proposal Faces Hard Questioning". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-06-14.
- Rivera, Ray (2007-06-11). "Queens Leader Supports Bloomberg's Traffic Plan". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- Nissan, Rita (2007-06-11). "Assembly Speaker Silver Not Sold on Congestion Pricing Plan". NY1. Archived from the original on 2008-04-12. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- Hakim, Danny (2007-06-12). "Silver Challenges Health Benefits Promised in Manhattan Toll Plan". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- "PlaNYC 2030: A Greener, Greater New York (Transportation)" (PDF). PlaNYC 2030. Retrieved 2007-06-14., p. 88
- "Interim Report for Public Comment" (Press release). NYSDOT. 2008-01-10. Archived from the original on 2012-12-14. Retrieved 2008-02-02.
- "A Deal, of Sorts, on Congestion Pricing". The New York Times. 2007-07-19. Retrieved 2017-08-28.
- "MTA Transit Improvements". edf.org. Regional Plan Association.
- Tri-State Transportation Campaign. "New Data Proves Congestion Pricing is Progressive Policy," accessed April 2, 2009
- "ga3.org". ga3.org.
- "MTA Capital Program 2008–2013" (PDF). Metropolitan Transportation Authority. February 1, 2008. pp. 142–145.
- "New York City Support For Congestion Pricing Slips, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Voters Call Federal Fund Promise Meddling". Quinnipiac University Poll. August 30, 2007. Retrieved 2017-08-23.
- "Kelly Tops List For New York City Mayor, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Voters Back Congestion Pricing, If Funds Go To Transit". Quinnipiac University Poll. 2008-03-13. Retrieved 2017-08-23.
- Schuster, Karla and James T. Madore (2007-06-12). "Silver hits brakes over city traffic plan". Newsday. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- Dobnik, Verena (2007-06-12). "NYC Lawmakers Hold Hearing on ‘Congestion Pricing’ Traffic Plan". Brooklyn Daily Eagle. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- Brodsky's Congestion Specifics, in New York's Premier Alternative Newspaper. Archived 2007-10-08 at the Wayback Machine.
- "CONGESTION TAX SCHEME MADE WORSE" (PDF).
- William Neuman (2008-02-01). "State Commission Approves a Plan for Congestion Pricing". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-03-01.
- "Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission Recommends Congestion Pricing Plan for New York City". Green Car Congress. 2008-01-31. Retrieved 2008-03-01.
- Diane Cardwell (2008-04-01). "City Council Approves Fee to Drive Below 60th". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-04-01.
- Nicholas Confessore (2008-04-08). "$8 Traffic Fee for Manhattan Gets Nowhere". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-04-08.
- William Neuman (2008-01-25). "Traffic Panel Members Expecto to Endorse Fees on Cars". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-03-01.
- Diane Cardwell (2008-03-22). "Paterson Supports Congestion Pricing". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-03-23.
- Ken Belson (2008-03-16). "Importing a Decongestant for Midtown Streets". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-03-18.
- Nicholas Confessore (2008-04-07). "Congestion Pricing Plan Is Dead, Assembly Speaker Says". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-04-07.
- Chicago gets congestion pricing money, accessed May 28, 2008
- (LAC)MTA votes for tolls on some carpool lanes by 2010, accessed May 28, 2008 Archived May 5, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.
- Neuman, William (2008-07-03). "Politics Failed, but Fuel Prices Cut Congestion". The New York Times. Retrieved 2010-05-20.
- Renn, Aaron M. (June 1, 2016). "When New York City tried to ban cars – the extraordinary story of 'Gridlock Sam'". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077.
- Santora, Marc (August 13, 2017). "Cuomo Calls Manhattan Traffic Plan an Idea ‘Whose Time Has Come’". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
- Marc Santora (2017-08-25). "Open-Road Tolls Could Pave the Way for Manhattan Congestion Pricing". NYTimes.com. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2017-08-25.
- Barone, Vincent (August 28, 2017). "Free East River bridges should stay that way: Queens pols". am New York. Retrieved 2017-08-28.
- Goodman, J. David (2017-08-21). "Mayor de Blasio Says He ‘Does Not Believe’ in Congestion Pricing". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2017-08-23.
- Mamelak, Kayla (August 2017). "Congestion pricing in NYC causes mixed reviews". Fox News. Retrieved 2017-08-28.