# Newmark-beta method

The Newmark-beta method is a method of numerical integration used to solve differential equations. It is widely used in numerical evaluation of the dynamic response of structures and solids such as in finite element analysis to model dynamic systems. The method is named after Nathan M. Newmark,[1] former Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Illinois, who developed it in 1959 for use in structural dynamics.

Using the extended mean value theorem, the Newmark-β method states that the first time derivative (velocity in the equation of motion) can be solved as,

${\displaystyle {\dot {u}}_{n+1}={\dot {u}}_{n}+\Delta t~{\ddot {u}}_{\gamma }\,}$

where

${\displaystyle {\ddot {u}}_{\gamma }=(1-\gamma ){\ddot {u}}_{n}+\gamma {\ddot {u}}_{n+1}~~~~0\leq \gamma \leq 1}$

therefore

${\displaystyle {\dot {u}}_{n+1}={\dot {u}}_{n}+(1-\gamma )\Delta t~{\ddot {u}}_{n}+\gamma \Delta t~{\ddot {u}}_{n+1}.}$

Because acceleration also varies with time, however, the extended mean value theorem must also be extended to the second time derivative to obtain the correct displacement. Thus,

${\displaystyle u_{n+1}=u_{n}+\Delta t~{\dot {u}}_{n}+{\begin{matrix}{\frac {1}{2}}\end{matrix}}\Delta t^{2}~{\ddot {u}}_{\beta }}$

where again

${\displaystyle {\ddot {u}}_{\beta }=(1-2\beta ){\ddot {u}}_{n}+2\beta {\ddot {u}}_{n+1}~~~~0\leq 2\beta \leq 1}$

Newmark showed that a reasonable value of ${\displaystyle \gamma }$ is 0.5, therefore the update rules are,

${\displaystyle {\dot {u}}_{n+1}={\dot {u}}_{n}+{\begin{matrix}{\frac {\Delta t}{2}}\end{matrix}}~({\ddot {u}}_{n}+{\ddot {u}}_{n+1})}$
${\displaystyle u_{n+1}=u_{n}+{\Delta }t~{\dot {u}}_{n}+{\begin{matrix}{\frac {1-2\beta }{2}}\end{matrix}}\Delta t^{2}{\ddot {u}}_{n}+\beta {\Delta }t^{2}{\ddot {u}}_{n+1}}$

Setting β to various values between 0 and 0.5 can give a wide range of results. Typically β = 1/4, which yields the constant average acceleration method, is used.

## References

1. ^ Newmark, N. M. (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 85 (EM3) 67-94.