Next Generation Air Transportation System

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) is an ongoing modernization project of the United States National Airspace System (NAS). The US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) began work on NextGen improvements in 2007 and plans to have all major components in place by 2025.[1][2]

The goals of the modernization include using new technologies and procedures to increase the safety, efficiency, capacity, access, flexibility, predictability, and resilience of the NAS while reducing the environmental impact of aviation.


The need for NextGen became apparent during the summer of 2000 when air travel was impeded by severe congestion and costly delays. Two years later, the Commission on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Industry recommended that a multi-agency task force develop an integrated plan to transform the U.S. air transportation system. In 2003, Congress enacted the Vision 100 – Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act, which established the Joint Planning and Development Office (JPDO) to create a unified vision of what the U.S. air transportation system should deliver for the next generation and beyond, to develop and coordinate long-term research plans, and to sponsor cross-agency mission research.

The result of the JPDO's efforts was the creation of the “Integrated National Plan for the Next Generation Air Transportation System” in 2004,[3] which defined high-level goals, objectives, and requirements to transform the air transportation system. In addition to the Department of Transportation and FAA, the plan involved other government agencies with responsibilities in air transportation services, including the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), National Weather Service, Department of Defense, and Transportation Security Administration.

The JPDO released the “Concept of Operations for the Next Generation Air Transportation System”[4] to the aviation stakeholder community in 2007. The concept of operations provided the overview of NextGen goals for 2025. Growth of the NextGen concept was an evolutionary, step-by-step process, and the JPDO document continued to be updated through 2011. The same year, the FAA published the first version of its expanded Operational Evolution Partnership,[5] which outlined the agency's path to NextGen through 2025.

The original integrated national plan included airport surface and passenger terminal operations and was known as a “curb-to-curb” solution. The concept of operations was intended to drive cross-agency research to validate the concepts and to eliminate ideas and alternatives that were not operationally feasible or beneficial. The FAA focused on the pieces of the air transportation system for which it was responsible – the “gate-to-gate” components. In 2011, the FAA published the report “NextGen Mid-Term Concept of Operations for the National Airspace System”. The FAA concept of operations was consistent with the JPDO's broad set of objectives, including maintaining safety and security, increasing capacity and efficiency, ensuring access to airspace and airports, and mitigating environmental impacts. The report identified several key transformational concepts as necessary to achieve NextGen goals and objectives, such as precision navigation and network-enabled information access, and the FAA has made progress on them.

Changes were underway in 2008 when the FAA started to move key parts of NextGen, such as Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast (ADS-B), from design to delivery. NextGen progress involved expanded research and development capability, participation by the aviation industry and international partners, and support by the White House and Congress (which are highlighted in this section).

The agency established a research and development facility, known as a testbed, at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, Florida, in 2008. In 2010, the FAA dedicated another testbed, the NextGen Integration and Evaluation Capability Laboratory at the William J. Hughes Technical Center in Atlantic City, New Jersey, for researchers to simulate and evaluate the effects of NextGen components on the NAS. The lab's capability grew in 2013 with a contract awarded to General Dynamics to provide engineering, software design and development, infrastructure, and administrative support.[6]

In 2008, the FAA signed agreements with Honeywell and ACSS to accelerate testing and installation of NextGen technology to detect and alert pilots of safety hazards on the airport surface.[7] NetJets also agreed to equip part of its fleet to test some programs in various areas of the United States.[8] By 2010, the FAA awarded Computer Support Services Inc. a $280 million contract to perform engineering work for NextGen, the first of six contracts that would be awarded under an umbrella portfolio contract. Boeing, General Dynamics, and ITT Corp. received FAA contracts worth up to $4.4 billion to conduct large-scale demonstrations to see how NextGen concepts, procedures, and technologies could be integrated into the current NAS. In 2012, the FAA selected Harris Corp., which then subcontracted Dataprobe, to develop the NAS Voice System and manage a $331 million Data Communications Integrated Services contract.[9][10]

Commercial airlines also became involved in NextGen. In 2011, the FAA signed an agreement with JetBlue to allow the carrier to fly select flights equipped with ADS-B, opening the airline to improved routing and giving the FAA NextGen data through real-time operational evaluations. United Airlines in 2013 announced plans to become the first carrier to equip a portion of its fleet with avionics necessary for Data Communications (Data Comm) under the FAA NextGen Data Comm avionics equipage program. The program was funded to equip 1,900 aircraft across the industry to ensure enough aircraft would participate in Data Comm.

To develop industry consensus for the FAA's midterm goals, the agency established a new task force carried out through RTCA in 2009.[11] The FAA wanted the task force to examine how industry could contribute to and benefit from the NextGen effort; accordingly, the agency released a plan in 2010 on how to implement recommendations.[12]

The NextGen Advisory Committee (NAC),[13] established in 2010 to address the task force recommendation to continue industry collaboration, is a federal advisory group comprising aviation stakeholders formed to provide advice on policy-level NextGen implementation issues facing the aviation community. The FAA and NAC in 2014 agreed on the NextGen Priorities Joint Implementation Plan to accelerate delivery of four core NextGen initiatives over three years to improve efficiency: optimizing airports with multiple runways (e.g. via simultaneous parallel landings with reduced separation), increasing the efficiency of surface operations, reconfiguring the navigation system from ground-based to primarily satellite-based, and improving communications between aircraft and the ground through a digital system.

The FAA seeks to ensure international air traffic management interoperability and system harmonization for improved safety and efficiency. In 2010, the FAA and the European Commission agreed to cooperate in 22 areas to help in joint research and development of NextGen and Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) projects. By 2012, the FAA and the A6 alliance of European air navigation service providers agreed to work toward an interoperable aviation system, and work together to deploy and implement NextGen and SESAR.

Executive Order 13479, Transformation of the National Air Transportation System,[14] signed in 2008 mandated the Secretary of Transportation to establish a NextGen support staff. The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012[15] included establishing deadlines for adopting existing NextGen navigation and surveillance technology and mandated development of precision navigational procedures at the nation's 35 busiest airports by 2015.

In 2010, the FAA's Aviation Safety organization released a work plan that identified how the safety staff would set NextGen standards and oversee safe implementation of new technologies, processes, and procedures. The FAA also issued a final rule mandating NextGen performance requirements for aircraft surveillance equipment. It requires aircraft operating in most controlled U.S. airspace to be equipped for ADS-B Out by January 1, 2020.


A Department of Transportation 30-year outlook report published in 2016, “Beyond Traffic: Trends and Choices 2045,” [16] estimated flight delays and congestion cost the U.S. economy more than $20 billion each year. In addition, the report predicts the total number of people flying on U.S. airlines will increase by 50 percent over the next two decades. If capacity is to keep pace with increased demand for services, changes are needed in the way services are provided.[17]

Civil air transportation contributes $1.8 trillion to the U.S. economy, supports nearly 11 million jobs, and makes up more than 5 percent of the U.S. gross domestic product.[18] NextGen is delivering benefits to continue to support U.S. aviation.[19] Air traffic controllers have better information to track and separate aircraft safely and efficiently. Pilots have more aeronautical, traffic, and weather information inside the cockpit. Airlines fly shorter, more direct routes to get passengers to their destinations more quickly while burning less fuel and producing fewer emissions.[20][21][22]

NextGen benefits aircraft operators, passengers, the government, and general public through enhanced safety, greater efficiency, and increased capacity. Monetized benefits comprise internal FAA cost savings, reduced passenger travel time, decreased aircraft operating costs, lower fuel consumption, fewer travel delays, avoided cancellations, additional flights, reduced carbon dioxide emissions, and reduced injuries, fatalities and aircraft losses and damages. NextGen systems also can increase controller and pilot productivity, such as with Data Communications.[23]

NextGen improvements are estimated to save 2.8 billion gallons of fuel through 2030 [24] and reduce carbon emissions by more than 650 million metric tons from 2020 to 2040.[25] Implemented changes accrued an estimated $2.7 billion in benefits from 2010 to 2016,[26] which increased to $7 billion in 2019.


As the NextGen concept formed, the FAA planned for implementation. The agency worked with industry to identify capabilities taking advantage of existing aircraft equipage.[27] This strategy enabled airspace users to realize early benefits while keeping NextGen on course to achieve its long-term goal of time-based air traffic management.

Next, the FAA started replacing its foundational infrastructure. Based on previous lessons learned, the agency determined the best way to upgrade its services was to begin with a new infrastructure that could accommodate state-of-the-art enabling technologies and advanced capabilities rather than adding one-off improvements to an aging infrastructure that couldn't accommodate broader transformation.

FAA modernization programs, such as En Route Automation Modernization (ERAM) and Terminal Automation Modernization and Replacement (TAMR), are foundational pieces upon which the FAA could build the NextGen vision. These programs support NextGen objectives with modern software architectures that serve as the platform for new capabilities for air traffic controllers and managers.

The FAA uses a widely accepted model for building large-scale automation systems. Program lifecycles are continuous with a planned schedule of technology refreshes. For example, the FAA finished installing the original hardware for ERAM in 2008, and completed software and program acceptance in 2015. In 2016, the agency updated the technology of all major system components that were becoming obsolete. This is a common approach to maintain the latest level of technology.

On top of the foundational systems, the FAA then identified key enabling systems that improve communication, information sharing, navigation, surveillance, traffic flow optimization, and weather systems.

Changes to the national airspace necessary to implement these individual concepts yield additional benefits. Integrating these systems is anticipated to transform the air traffic management system in an effort to keep pace with the growing needs of an increasingly diverse mix of air transportation system users without sacrificing safety.

Integration is necessary to achieve an FAA long-term goal of trajectory-based operations (TBO). TBO is a method of strategically planning and managing air traffic from airport to airport for optimal performance by using the aircraft's ability to fly precise paths; metering traffic flow using time instead of distance; and sharing information between pilots, flight dispatchers, and controllers and managers.[28]

With TBO, the FAA and operators will be able to tell with a great deal of accuracy where aircraft will be at any point in time along the way to its destination. This will provide improved knowledge of the estimated departure and arrival time at each navigational waypoint along the entire route of flight. These times will be shared between air and ground automation systems and used to improve assessments of how to balance demand and capacity, and minimize the impact of disruptions due to weather, or system or facility outages. NextGen benefits extend to all phases of flight operations.

Because NextGen is a complex, large-scale system of systems implemented over more than 18 years, its development and implementation can be difficult to follow. Systems are always in various stages of lifecycle management from research and development to technical refreshes. FAA planning reports are used to map the evolution from the legacy National Airspace System (NAS) to NextGen. To manage NextGen with short-term funding horizons, the FAA rolled out improvements in smaller increments with more program segments to ensure affordability.

The FAA has scheduled initial implementation of all major planned systems by 2025 but not the full integration necessary to provide the complete set of anticipated NextGen benefits. Beyond 2025, the FAA expects to accrue benefits through enterprise-level advanced applications, additional aircraft equipage, and full workforce adoption of a time-based air traffic management system.[29]

The FAA is using knowledge gained since 2011 when it published the NextGen Mid-Term Concept of Operations. Working closely with stakeholders, the FAA invested in research and pre-implementation work to determine the feasibility of advanced concepts and their associated benefits.[30] The aviation community understood that many, but not all, of the concepts would produce positive business cases once research and pre-implementation work was under way, and that some goals would be replaced by other concepts in an evolving aviation environment. The FAA refined the path that the NextGen planners envisioned with a few adjustments, eliminating some concepts that were high cost, high risk, or of low benefit based on research and industry feedback. The FAA is making progress in transforming the NAS.[31][32][33][34]

Six concepts that posed too high a technical risk, for instance those with no available technical solution, have been deferred beyond 2030. Some concepts that required more research to garner evidence of perceived operational benefits also have been deferred for implementation into the later segments of NextGen.[35]


NextGen is generally described as a shift from a ground-based system of air traffic control to a satellite-based system of air traffic management. It is not one technology, product, or goal. Rather, it encompasses many technologies, policies, and procedures, and changes are implemented after thorough safety testing. It is composed of many elements that provide benefits individually and collectively to transform the air transportation system.


Controller Pilot Data Link Communications, also known as Data Communications or just Data Comm, uses typed digital messages to supplement voice communications between air traffic controllers and pilots. The first part of the program for 55 airports, tower departure clearance services, finished in 2016 more than two years ahead of schedule. It is helping equipped aircraft take off sooner through messages quickly exchanged and clearly understood.

Unlike voice messages, Data Comm messages sent by controllers are delivered only to the intended aircraft, which eliminates the chance of another pilot acting on instructions for another aircraft with a similar call sign. It avoids the chance of misunderstood messages because of busy radio chatter or variations in the way people speak, and it can be a backup if a microphone malfunctions. It also preserves radio bandwidth when voice communication is necessary or preferred.[36]

Using Data Comm, tower air traffic controllers can send pilots of equipped aircraft departure clearance instructions to read, accept, and load into their flight management system with the push of a button. Messages also are sent to flight dispatchers, giving everyone a shared awareness for faster reactions to changing circumstances, such as approaching thunderstorms.

Data Comm saves aircraft time waiting to take off, particularly when routes change, which reduces fuel use and engine exhaust emissions. It lowers the chances of delays or cancellations when weather affects the flight route. Pilots and controllers also can spend more time on other critical tasks, which enhances safety.[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]

Based on Data Comm's success, air carriers requested and the FAA approved in 2017 seven more airports to receive tower services to be completed by 2019. The first of these completed was Joint Base Andrews in November 2017.[48] The final airport was Van Nuys, which was completed in August 2018.[49]

Data Comm is expected to provide even greater benefits to air carriers and passengers when it starts serving aircraft at cruising altitudes. More types of air traffic controller messages will be available, including the ability to reroute multiple aircraft. Initial Data Comm services for high-altitude flight started in November 2019 at the Kansas City and Indianapolis air route traffic control centers and are scheduled to be in place at all 20 centers across the country by 2021.[50]

Voice exchanges will always be part of air traffic control. In critical situations, they continue to be the primary form of controller-pilot interaction. For routine communications between pilots and controllers, Data Comm will increase efficiency and airspace capacity. Data Comm is expected to save operators more than $10 billion over the 30-year life cycle of the program and the FAA about $1 billion in future operating costs.[51]


Performance Based Navigation (PBN) is an instrument flight rules way of moving through airspace that varies depending equipage, navigational aids, and pilot training. Performance standards for certain airspace are conveyed to pilots through navigation specifications published by the FAA that identify the aircraft avionics and choice of ground- or satellite-based navigation aids that may be used to meet performance requirements.

PBN comprises area navigation (RNAV) and required navigation performance (RNP). With RNAV, equipped aircraft fly any desired path within the coverage of ground- or space-based navigation aids, within the capability of aircraft equipage, or both. RNP is an advanced form of RNAV. Aircraft must be equipped to monitor onboard navigation performance and alert pilots trained to use it if a requirement is unmet during an operation. Aircraft can operate safely near mountainous terrain or in congested airspace by using RNP procedures.

PBN primarily uses satellite-enabled technology and creates precise, repeatable, and predictable 3-D flight paths free from the constraints previously imposed by the physical locations of ground-based navigation infrastructure. A new route structure makes straighter paths possible for greater efficiency, and more routes can fit into the same airspace, which increases capacity. From 2009 to 2016, PBN procedures available nearly tripled at airports across the nation. As of June 2020, the FAA has published more than 9,600 PBN procedures and routes.[52][53][54] These consist of RNAV standard instrument departures, T-Routes (1,200 feet above the surface to 18,000 feet of altitude), Q-Routes (18,000–45,000 feet of altitude), RNAV standard terminal arrivals (STAR), RNAV (GPS) approaches, and RNP approaches.[55][56] Of the airports that publish instrument approach procedures, 96 percent publish PBN approach procedures and 31 percent use only PBN approach procedures.

RNAV STAR procedures can provide a continuous descent approach also known as an optimized profile descent from cruising altitude to save fuel and reduce emissions and noise.[57] The FAA has published many RNAV STAR procedures with this capability that enable aircraft to fly closer to the airport at a more fuel-efficient altitude before descending, which also saves fuel by eliminating level-offs.[58][59] These procedures can be flown when available and when pilots are able to use them.

Using the Wide Area Augmentation System, instrument-rated pilots now can land at airports where that was previously impossible using just GPS. At an airport where a ground-based Instrument Landing System (ILS) may be out of service, PBN approach procedures serve as a backup. The FAA will seldom, if ever, install a new ILS, opting instead for PBN approach procedures, which save money. The FAA is working to cut costs by reducing the amount of ground-based navigation infrastructure, which will remain as alternative in case of satellite service disruptions.[60]

In response to recommendations from the aviation community through RTCA's NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force, the FAA began integrating PBN procedures to improve air traffic flow for 11 metroplexes, which are metropolitan areas where crowded airspace serve the needs of multiple airports.[61] Through collaboration with the NextGen Advisory Committee, the FAA completed PBN work at Atlanta, Charlotte, Cleveland-Detroit,[62] Denver,[63] Houston,[64] Northern California, North Texas, Southern California, and Washington D.C. The remaining metroplexes scheduled to receive PBN changes are Las Vegas and South Central Florida.[65][66][67][68][69]

PBN procedures also reduced oceanic separation standards laterally and longitudinally from 100 nautical miles to 30 nm.[70] PBN improved lateral separation standards for approaches at airports with closely spaced parallel runways from 4,300 feet to 3,600 feet in 2013,[71] and an Equivalent Lateral Spacing Operations standard enabled through PBN gives extra flexibility at airports for additional departures.[72][73] A rule change in 2015 allows aircraft to safely and efficiently land at parallel runways without receiving directions from air traffic controllers monitoring them on radar.[74] The FAA implemented a national standard in 2016 for that capability, which is known as Established on RNP.[75]

The FAA aims for PBN to be used as a basis for daily operations throughout the National Airspace System, employing the appropriate procedure to meet the need. In some cases — as with metroplexes — this will include a highly structured, yet flexible, navigation pattern.[76][77]


Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast (ADS-B) is a technology that represents a major change in flight tracking. Aircraft flying in most controlled airspace were required to be equipped for ADS-B Out by January 1, 2020. Instead of using ground-based radar to receive aircraft position, speed, and direction every five to 12 seconds, aircraft equipped with newer GPS transponders determine this information and then automatically send it out every second to air traffic control. ADS-B is always on and requires no operator intervention. It depends on an accurate satellite signal for position data, enhances surveillance services, and continuously broadcasts aircraft position and other data to ground stations and aircraft equipped to receive ADS-B. Pilots and air traffic controllers can for the first time see the same real-time display of air traffic, which substantially improves situational awareness for improved safety.

The FAA completed installation of new ground radio infrastructure in 2014, and coverage is available in all 50 states, Guam, Puerto Rico, the Gulf of Mexico, and area off both coasts. Integration of ADS-B into en route and terminal automation platforms was completed in 2019.[78]

The FAA is evaluating space-based ADS-B surveillance services for oceanic airspace as part of a project called Advanced Surveillance Enhanced Procedural Separation.[79] Moving from the current system of ADS-B ground stations to radios hosted on satellites offers the potential for reduced separation standards.[80][81][82] Even with the capabilities offered by ADS-B through satellite technology, surveillance radar is still relevant and will be used as a supplement and ultimately as backup to ADS-B in the event of service disruption.[83]

ADS-B Out[edit]

With ADS-B Out, surveillance coverage increases because ground stations can be provided in locations where obstructions or physical limitations don't allow radar. Future intended time and position of aircraft will be more accurate for optimal flight and traffic flow. Airlines that fly routes over the Gulf of Mexico or offshore routes without radar coverage can use ADS-B to follow more-efficient routes and be diverted less often due to weather.[84]

At the nation's busiest airports, ADS-B Out is part of Airport Surface Detection Equipment–Model X at 35 sites and Airport Surface Surveillance Capability, which operates at eight sites. Controllers can track the surface movement of aircraft and airport ground vehicles, which helps reduce the risk of taxiway conflicts and runway incursions.[85]

Another ground-based surveillance system that uses ADS-B is Wide Area Multilateration (WAM), which can be installed in locations where radar is limited or can't be used. It is operational at many airports in the Colorado mountains and in Juneau, Alaska. It also is being used to help Charlotte fully transition to ADS-B.[86]

Because of the more frequent position update and coverage in areas without radar, ADS-B Out helps in performing life-saving search and rescue missions.[87][88]

ADS-B In[edit]

Operators who choose to equip their aircraft to receive ADS-B signals for ADS-B In can gain many other benefits.

ADS-B In brings several services at no cost to pilots, such as a display showing nearby aircraft and weather information.[89][90] For general aviation aircraft, ADS-B Traffic Awareness System offers a low-cost alerting capability to prevent aircraft collisions.[91] The more advanced Airborne Collision Avoidance System X will support access to closely spaced runways in almost all weather conditions, flight deck interval management, and separation similar to traditional visual operations with fewer nuisance alerts. The FAA expects ACAS X will replace the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System.[92][93][94][95]

In-Trail Procedures (ITP), reduces separation between aircraft during oceanic flights. ADS-B-equipped aircraft with ITP software can fly more often at more fuel-efficient or less-turbulent flight levels.[96] The FAA is developing interval management applications that use ADS-B In to sequence and space aircraft pairs. Interval management's precise spacing enables more-efficient flight paths in congested airspace and maximizes airspace and airport use.

The first ground-based phase became operational at the Albuquerque Air Route Traffic Control Center in 2014 and is being deployed to additional centers.[97] Advanced interval management uses ground and flight-deck capabilities and procedures and is expected to be operational after 2020.

Enhanced air traffic control capabilities for closely spaced parallel runway approach operations also will be assisted by ADS-B In integrated with terminal automation systems. Research continues on using ADS-B for paired approaches to parallel runways, in which aircraft stay separated enough to avoid wake turbulence while also maintaining a precise relative position to ensure safe separation.[98]

Cockpit Display of Traffic Information Assisted Visual Separation is showing to enhance traffic situational awareness for air carriers. It allows the flight crew to continue a visual landing procedure using the electronic display to maintain separation if the pilot loses sight of traffic because of reduced visibility, which reduces time and distance flown.[99]

Although it can be used without it, a NASA-developed application called Traffic Aware Strategic Aircrew Requests (TASAR) could benefit from aircraft equipped with ADS-B In. TASAR suggests a new route or altitude change to save time or fuel, and ADS-B In can assist by enabling the software to determine what requests will likely be approved by air traffic control due to nearby traffic. A NASA study of Alaska Airlines flights projected that the airline would save more than 1 million gallons of fuel, more than 110,000 minutes of flight time, and $5.2 million annually.[100][101][102]


Air Traffic Control Computer Stations[edit]

En route automation drives display screens used by air traffic controllers to safely manage and separate aircraft at cruising altitudes. Terminal automation is for controllers to manage air traffic immediately around major airports. It is used for separating and sequencing of aircraft, conflict and terrain avoidance alerts, weather advisories, and radar vectoring for departing and arriving traffic.[103]

NextGen's En Route Automation Modernization (ERAM) platform replaced the legacy Host system for en route air traffic control in 2015.[104][105] En route controllers can now track as many as 1,900 aircraft at a time, up from the previous 1,100 limit. Coverage extends beyond facility boundaries, enabling controllers to handle traffic more efficiently. This coverage is possible because ERAM can process data from 64 radars versus 24.

For pilots, ERAM increases flexible routing around congestion, weather, and other restrictions. Real-time air traffic management and information sharing on flight restrictions improves airlines’ ability to plan flights with minimal changes. Reduced vectoring and increased radar coverage leads to smoother, faster, and more cost-efficient flights.

Trajectory modeling is more accurate, allowing maximum airspace use, better conflict detection and improved decision-making. Two functionally identical channels with dual redundancy eliminate a single point of failure. ERAM also provides a user-friendly interface with customizable displays. It revolutionizes controller training with a realistic, high-fidelity system that challenges developmental practices with complex approaches, maneuvers, and simulated pilot scenarios that are unavailable with Host.[106]

In 2016, the Terminal Automation Modernization and Replacement program's Standard Terminal Automation Replacement System (STARS) was deployed at the largest 11 terminal radar approach control (TRACON) facilities.[107] These facilities handle 80 percent of all traffic arriving and departing from U.S. airports with state-of-the-art technology and equipment.[108] The FAA plans to complete STARS installation at all 155 civilian TRACONs in 2020. STARS maintains safety while increasing cost-effectiveness at terminal facilities across the National Airspace System (NAS). It provides advanced functionalities for controllers, such as state-of-the-art flat-panel LED display and the ability to save controller workstation preferences. It also offers an easier-to-maintain infrastructure for technicians.

While not NextGen programs themselves, ERAM and STARS lay the foundation to enable critical NextGen capabilities in terminal and en route airspace.[109]

Traffic Flow Decision Support Systems[edit]

These FAA Decision Support Systems (DSS) are used by air traffic controllers to optimize traffic flow across the NAS and are central to the FAA's goal of trajectory-based operations:

  • Traffic Flow Management System (TFMS)
  • Time Based Flow Management (TBFM)
  • Terminal Flight Data Manager (TFDM)

TFMS is the primary automation system used by the Air Traffic Control System Command Center and nationwide traffic management units to regulate air traffic flow, manage throughput, and plan for future air traffic demand.[110] TFMS's 31 tools exchange information and support other DSS through System Wide Information Management (SWIM). The FAA deployed a TFMS software refresh to 82 sites in 2016 and completed a hardware refresh at those sites in 2018. The FAA continues to develop future concepts for TFMS modeling and predicting capabilities.[111]

TBFM is a system that allows traffic management units to schedule and optimize the arrival load for major airports. It is operational at 20 en route centers, 28 TRACONs, and 45 airport towers. Its tools, such as extended metering and integrated departure arrival capability, help controllers sequence traffic with time instead of distance. Performance Based Navigation route and procedure data help improve predicted arrival times. TBFM will lengthen its metering capability into terminal airspace with the terminal sequencing and spacing tool developed by NASA and delivered to the FAA in 2014.[112] Its first deployment is planned for 2021. The integrated departure arrival capability tool is scheduled to be available at the last of six sites in 2021.

TFDM is the NextGen surface management solution. The system delivers decision support capabilities on the airport ground by integrating flight, surface surveillance, and traffic management information using SWIM. TFDM tools consist of electronic flight strips, departure queue management, surface management, and surface situational awareness. In 2016, the FAA awarded Lockheed Martin a $344 million contract to develop and deploy the TFDM system. The FAA is completing early implementation of two TFDM elements, the Surface Visualization Tool and Advanced Electronic Flight Strips.[113][114] TFDM is set for initial operation at Phoenix in 2021, with 88 more sites to follow through 2028.[115] Implementation of electronic flight data and the integration of TBFM and TFMS through SWIM will enable TFDM to consolidate some previously independent systems.[116]

Advanced Technologies and Oceanic Procedures[edit]

Advanced Technologies and Oceanic Procedures (ATOP) replace existing oceanic air traffic control systems and procedures. It fully integrates flight and radar data processing, detects conflicts between aircraft, provides satellite data link communication and surveillance, eliminates paper flight strips, and automates manual processes.

ATOP fully modernizes oceanic air traffic control automation and allows flight operators to take further advantage of investments in cockpit digital communications. The FAA reduces intensive manual processes that limit controllers’ ability to safely handle airline requests for more efficient tracks or altitudes over long oceanic routes. The FAA can meet international commitments of reducing aircraft separation standards, which increase flight capacity and efficiency. ATOP is used at all three oceanic en route traffic control centers, which are in Anchorage, New York, and Oakland.[117][118]

Information Management[edit]

System Wide Information Management[edit]

The FAA traditionally shared critical information using a variety of technologies, including radio, telephone, Internet, and dedicated connections. However, the agency leveraged new information management technologies to improve information delivery and content.[119] In 2007, the FAA established the SWIM program to implement a set of information technology principles in the National Airspace System (NAS) and provide users with relevant and commonly understandable information.[120] SWIM facilitates NextGen's data-sharing requirements, serving as the digital data-sharing backbone. This platform offers a single point of access for more than 100 products, categorized into aeronautical, flight and traffic flow, and weather data. Producers can publish data once, and approved consumers can access needed information through a single connection, an improvement over the legacy way of connecting two systems with fixed network connections and custom point-to-point application-level data interfaces. The new format supports collaboration within domestic and international aviation communities.[121]

In 2015, the SWIM program completed its first segment, which established a common infrastructure and connection points at all en route traffic control centers. The program's second segment in 2016 established a service-oriented architecture — composed of producers, consumers, and a registry — and connected National Airspace System (NAS) programs, such as the Traffic Flow Management System, to provide large data sources for consumers. Several enhancements are being added, including improved security, and SWIM continues to add NAS air traffic management content providers and consumers.

As of 2019, 11 NAS programs and six external organizations produce data for 80 services sent via the SWIM network. More than 400 consumers are registered to access this data.[122] A cloud distribution system established in 2019 is expected to help further increase the number of users.[123] The revised setup of SWIM reduces costs, can increase operational efficiency, and opens the possibility of creating new services for the aviation community. Data sharing among pilots, flight operations personnel, controllers, and air traffic managers will be essential to achieving a NextGen objective of trajectory-based operations.[124]

Airlines and airports report using FAA data to improve operations. The most extensive use of SWIM data was supporting improved awareness of operating conditions and flight status, especially on the airport surface and in situations when aircraft transition from the control of one air traffic control center to another. The most dynamic use of real-time surveillance data outside the FAA may be providing flight-tracking services to the flying public and aviation businesses. Through web browsers and mobile apps, service subscribers can access current information about flight and airport status and delays.[125]

Aeronautical Mobile Airport Communication System[edit]

Transmission of information necessary to conduct efficient airport surface operations in the years ahead will be possible with the Aeronautical Mobile Airport Communication System (AeroMACS). The system uses wireless broadband technology that supports the increasing need for data communications and information sharing on the airport surface for fixed and mobile applications now and into the future.[126] Besides improved capacity, aging airport communications infrastructure requires more extensive and expensive monitoring, maintenance, repair, or replacement. Airport construction and unexpected equipment outages also require temporary communications alternatives, and AeroMACS also could serve as a backup. The system is currently being implemented under the FAA Airport Surface Surveillance Capability program.[127]


The FAA's NextGen Weather program provides aviation weather products that support air traffic management during weather events, helping improve aviation safety as well as minimizing passenger delays. The largest cause of NAS air traffic delays is weather, which was responsible for 69 percent of system-impacting delays of more than 15 minutes from 2008 to 2013.[128][129] With more accurate and timely weather predictions, airports and airlines could prevent as many as two-thirds of weather-related delays and cancellations.[130]

NextGen weather systems consist of the NextGen Weather Processor (NWP) and Common Support Services– Weather (CSS-Wx), both scheduled to be operational across the NAS in 2023. The NWP program will establish a common weather processing platform to replace the legacy FAA weather processor systems and supply new capabilities. The fully automated NWP will identify safety hazards around airports and in cruising altitude airspace. It will support strategic traffic flow management, including the translated weather information needed to predict route blockage and airspace capacity constraints up to eight hours in advance. NWP will use advanced algorithms to create current and predicted aviation-specific weather information with data from the FAA and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) radar and sensors, and NOAA forecast models. Part of the NWP, the Aviation Weather Display consolidates the current Weather and Radar Processor, Integrated Terminal Weather System, and the Corridor Integrated Weather System displays. The Aviation Weather Display will provide consistent weather information at a glance for en route and terminal controllers, and includes NWP and NOAA weather products.[131]

CSS-Wx will be the single producer of weather data, products, and imagery within the NAS, using standards-based weather dissemination via SWIM. It will consolidate and enable the decommissioning of legacy weather dissemination systems. It also offers NWP and NOAA weather products, and other weather sources for integration into air traffic decision support systems, improving the quality of traffic management decisions and enhancing controller productivity during severe weather. CSS-Wx information consumers will include air traffic controllers and managers, commercial and general aviation operators, and the flying public.[132]

The FAA's Weather Technology in the Cockpit team of researchers are experts on the pitfalls of how weather is displayed in general aviation cockpits.[133] Their main research goal is to encourage improvements in how meteorological information is shown in the cockpit so pilots can consistently and accurately interpret that information, understand its limitations and use it effectively to avoid bad weather.[134][135]

Multiple Runway Operations and Separation Management[edit]

Efficiency of multiple runway operations (MRO), particularly those that are closely spaced, has been limited by safety risks, including collisions and wake turbulence with nearby aircraft. MRO advancements improve access to closely spaced parallel runways to enable more departure and arrival operations during instrument meteorological conditions, which increase efficiency and capacity while reducing flight delays. MRO enables the use of simultaneous approaches in low-visibility conditions, decreases separation for approaches to runways with stricter spacing requirements, and reduces the effects of wake turbulence that leads to increased separation.[136][137]

Revised wake separation standards, known as wake recategorization or Wake Recat, were reduced at 14 terminal radar approach control facilities and 28 airports across the United States.[138][139] At Indianapolis, airlines save more than $2 million per year in operational costs with Wake Recat. At Philadelphia, airlines save about $800,000 per year.[140]

Phase 1 of wake recategorization replaced a weight-based standard with new size categories more optimally based on aircraft wake turbulence characteristics. Phase 1.5 refined Phase 1 with further reductions to separation.[141] Phase II defined pair-wise wake turbulence separation standards among 123 aircraft types that make up 99 percent of global operations at 32 U.S. airports. Air traffic control operations then can implement custom wake turbulence categories that are optimized to maximize the benefit for an airport fleet.

Phases 1 and 1.5 were implemented at 31 airports. Consolidated wake turbulence (CWT) aims to use the best set of separation standards derived from these phases. The FAA plans to convert legacy standards from the two phases into CWT standards. When completed, CWT will be in effect at 107 airports.[142]

The FAA continues to evaluate procedures at airports with closely spaced runways.[143] After determining that lateral runway separation can be reduced safely, the FAA revised the separation standard from 4,300 feet to 3,600 feet for independent arrivals in August 2013. For independent runways, aircraft can approach without having to maintain a staggered diagonal separation required by dependent operations. Further revisions to closely spaced parallel operations were included in the November 2015 update to FAA Order 7110.65, Air Traffic Control.

The new procedures reduce lateral separation requirements to as close as 3,900 feet for triple independent approaches, and 3,000 feet for offset dual independent approaches without requiring high-update-rate radar or Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast. For dual dependent approaches, the runway spacing requirement remains 2,500 feet, but the diagonal spacing is reduced from 1.5 nautical mile (nm) to 1 nm.

FAA Order 7110.308C identifies specific airports — Boston, Cleveland, Memphis, Newark, Philadelphia, Seattle, San Francisco, and St. Louis — with runways spaced less than 2,500 feet apart that can reduce staggered spacing between aircraft on parallel approaches from 1.5 nm to 1 nm.[144]

The Converging Runway Display Aid is an automation tool used by air traffic controllers to manage the sequence of arrival flows on converging or intersecting runways.[145] It is operational at Boston, Chicago O’Hare, Denver, Las Vegas, Memphis, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Newark, Phoenix, and Philadelphia, and enhances an airport's effective throughput under certain conditions.[146]

A separation efficiency tool called Automated Terminal Proximity Alert was first implemented at Minneapolis-St. Paul in May 2011 and now is deployed at 14 terminal radar approach control facilities across the country. It better informs air traffic controllers of gaps so they can tell pilots to adjust their speed or direct them on a shorter path the runway. During its first year of use, the number of go-arounds declined by 23 percent for flights headed to Minneapolis-St. Paul. Excess flight time due to a go-around decreased by 19 percent.[147][148]

Improved Approaches and Low-Visibility Operations[edit]

The FAA supports several optional capabilities for operators who need to access an airport when the cloud ceiling is less than 200 feet above the runway or visibility is less than a half mile. They help to achieve NextGen goals of safely increasing access, efficiency, and throughput at many airports when low visibility is the limiting factor.

Expanded Low Visibility Operations is a low-cost infrastructure program to reduce minimum ceilings and runway visual range through a combination of ground equipment and navigation procedures. Most ELVO improvements result from FAA Order 8400.13.[149] [150]

Head-up displays (HUD) were approved to use on a precision approach to lower minimum decision heights to land. Use of a qualified HUD when flying to a suitable Instrument Landing System facility will reduce the required runway visual range visibility for approach.

The FAA allows the use of an enhanced flight vision system (EFVS) instead of natural vision to conduct an instrument landing procedure in low-visibility conditions.[151][152] EFVS uses sensor technologies to provide a clear, real-time virtual image to the pilot of the view outside the aircraft, regardless of the cloud cover and visibility conditions. Pilots can identify required visual references that would be impossible without it. It provides access that otherwise would be denied because of low visibility. A synthetic vision guidance system combines flight guidance display technology with high-precision position assurance monitors to provide a continuous and correct depiction of the external scene and runway. It can assist a pilot's transition to natural vision references. A project also is under way to enable taxiing at airports in low-visibility conditions.

Another NextGen project is the Ground Based Augmentation System Landing System (GBAS). It uses GPS to support all precision-approach categories. Newark and Houston operate non-federal GBAS systems approved for operations to as low as 200 feet above the runway.[153]

After a reduction of minimum visual runway range requirements, an FAA assessment showed airport access during low-visibility conditions improved in two ways: almost 6 percent fewer periods of time with no access and 17 percent more flights could land.[154]

Initial tailored arrivals are available for certain aircraft flying into San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Miami. These arrivals are planned, fixed routes for aircraft approaching these airports from oceanic airspace that are communicated via a data link from the air traffic controller. They limit vectoring and minimize the time the aircraft spends maintaining level flight during descent, which reduces fuel consumption, aircraft exhaust emissions, and time in flight. These differ from Performance Based Navigation's optimized profile descents because they are tailored to the characteristics of a limited number of aircraft types equipped with the Future Air Navigation System.[155][156][157]

Airport Mapping[edit]

The FAA Office of Airports Geographic Information System (GIS) program provides data to manage aeronautical information and NextGen implementation.[158] GIS identifies the geographic location and characteristics of natural or constructed features or boundaries on the earth's surface. The airport data is used to develop and implement obstruction analyses, more accurate Notices to Airmen and flight deck airport moving map functionality, and Performance Based Navigation procedures, including Wide Area Augmentation System/Localizer Performance with Vertical Guidance approaches.[159]

Energy and Environment[edit]

The FAA's environmental vision is to develop and operate a system that protects the environment while allowing for sustained aviation growth. The FAA Office of Environment and Energy Research and Development is working to reduce air and water pollution, carbon dioxide emissions that may affect climate, and noise that can disturb residents near airports. Airframe and aircraft engine technology, alternative fuels, air traffic management modernization and operational improvements, improved scientific knowledge and integrated modeling, and policies, environmental standards, and market-based measures will contribute toward meeting almost all of these goals. Noise and emissions will be the main environmental problems on National Airspace System capacity and flexibility unless they are effectively managed and mitigated.[160]

An FAA study conducted in 2015 showed that since 1975, the number of people flying in the United States increased from about 200 million to an estimated 800 million, yet the number of people exposed to significant aircraft noise had dropped from about 7 million to nearly 340,000.[161] Even with this decrease, community concern regarding aircraft noise is climbing. The FAA aims to minimize the impact of noise on residential areas without compromising safety. The agency's goal was to reduce the number of people around airports exposed to a day-night average aircraft sound level of 65 decibels to less than 300,000 by 2018.[162] One way the agency planned to achieve that is by adopting a new noise standard for certain newly certificated subsonic jet airplanes and subsonic transport category large airplanes.[163][164]

A survey, the largest of its kind, about aircraft noise exposure and its effects on communities around airports was completed in 2016.[165] The FAA will use those results and other research under way to re-evaluate criteria to define significance under the National Environmental Policy Act and federal land use guidelines. In addition, the FAA has researched other impact areas, such as sleep disturbance, cardiovascular health, and children's learning.[166] The FAA also is examining the potential noise impacts of new entrants, such as unmanned aircraft systems, civil supersonic aircraft, and commercial space vehicles.[167]

The Continuous Lower Energy, Emissions, and Noise (CLEEN) program is a public-private partnership under NextGen to accelerate development and commercial deployment of more-efficient technologies and sustainable alternative fuels.[168] The first five-year agreement with manufacturers produced jet engine, wing, and aerodynamic technologies; automation and flight management systems; fuels; and materials from 2010 to 2015. One result of this effort is General Electric's Twin Annular Pre-mixing Swirler II Combustor, which reduces nitrogen oxide emissions by more than 60 percent compared to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) nitrogen oxide standard adopted in 2004. A second five-year agreement started in 2015 aims to lower cumulative noise levels, reduce fuel consumption, cut nitrogen oxide emissions, and speed commercialization of alternative jet fuels.[169]

Since 2009, ATSM International approved five ways of producing alternative jet fuel that requires no modification to aircraft or engines, and more are being developed, tested, and evaluated.[170] [171]The FAA's efforts helped United Airlines use an alternative jet fuel made from hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids for its daily operations at Los Angeles starting in 2016.[172]

About 167,000 general aviation aircraft use leaded aviation gasoline, the only remaining transportation fuel in the United States that contains lead. For general aviation pilots flying piston engine aircraft, the FAA and Piston Aviation Fuels Initiative are researching an acceptable unleaded fuel alternative.[173][174]

The FAA uses the Aviation Environmental Design Tool to assess the environmental impact of federal actions at airports as well as on air traffic, airspace, and aviation procedures, and along with other federal agencies and Transport Canada, funds the Aviation Sustainability Center, which is contributing to developing international aviation emission and noise standards. In 2016, the United States and 22 countries reached an agreement on a first-ever global aircraft carbon dioxide standard to encourage more fuel-efficient technologies to be integrated into aircraft designs.[175] In 2020, the ICAO council adopted a new environmental measure of non-volatile particulate matter emissions.[176] It replaces the 1970s-era “smoke number” — a figure that describes the visibility of emissions — with a much more accurate measure of emissions particles.


The FAA's safety program is guided by its Safety Management System — an agency-wide approach that directs the management of NextGen initiatives. NextGen capabilities’ benefits must maintain safe operations in the National Airspace System (NAS), and the FAA has many processes to ensure that flying remains safe.[177][178]

The interconnected nature of NextGen presents complicated safety challenges that call for an integrated approach to safety risk management. Integrated safety risk management explores safety risk from a NAS enterprise framework to identify potential safety gaps inherent in NextGen capabilities. It identifies safety issues by assessing risk across organizational, system, and program boundaries, and relies on FAA-wide collaboration to capture the most relevant safety information to assist in decision-making.

Aviation watchdogs once measured safety by the number of accidents. Commercial aviation accidents eventually became so rare that the FAA began to measure potential precursors to accidents. Loss of a safe margin of separation between aircraft became the risk measure that the FAA tracked and reported. Proximity is a valid indicator, but is an incomplete picture and provides no insight into accidents’ causal factors. System Safety Management is a NextGen portfolio of initiatives to develop and implement policies, processes, and analytical tools that the FAA and industry will use to ensure the safety of the NAS. The goal is to be certain that changes introduced with NextGen capabilities maintain or enhance safety while delivering capacity and efficiency benefits to NAS users.

Improved risk analysis processes and new safety intelligence tools help safety analysts go beyond examining past accident data to detecting risk and implementing mitigation strategies for accident prevention. FAA resources such as the Hazard Identification, Risk Management, and Tracking tool; Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing program;[179][180] and Airport Surface Anomaly Investigation Capability tool provide the platform for improvements to the safety performance measurement infrastructure. They are part of the System Safety Management Transformation project that will enable safety analyses to determine how NAS-wide operational improvements will affect safety and evaluate potential safety risk mitigations.[181]

The Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST), composed of air carriers, manufacturers, industry associations regulators, labor unions, and air traffic controllers, helped reduce the fatality risk for commercial aviation in the United States by 83 percent from 1998 to 2007. With the help of these new initiatives, the team's latest goal is to lower the U.S. commercial fatality risk another 50 percent by 2025 from the 2010 rate. The CAST plan comprises 96 enhancements aimed at improving safety across a wide variety of operations.[182][183]

Stakeholder Collaboration[edit]

NextGen modernization is a team effort that involves the FAA workforce and industry, interagency, and international partnerships. The FAA continues to strengthen relationships with its workforce and labor union partners to ensure that everyone has the skills necessary to run the future National Airspace System (NAS).[184][185] Training will evolve to make sure that the NAS workforce understands — and takes ownership of — the changing operational concepts and their effects on how services are provided. Recurrent air traffic control training will need to evolve from a focus on automation manipulation to one that ensures all participants in the NAS understand the changing operational concepts and their implications for how services are provided. The process requires the engagement and ownership of the entire aviation workforce, including pilots, controllers, inspectors, regulators, flight safety professionals, engineers, technicians, and program managers. The FAA is focused on ensuring that its labor force will have the leadership, technical, and functional skills to safely and productively transition and manage the needs of the future NAS. This transformation includes leadership development, skills identification and development, and attracting talent.[186][187]

Through the NextGen Advisory Committee (NAC), the FAA and industry have collaborated to identify and deliver the capabilities that matter most to customers.[188] The FAA formed the NAC in 2010 to work with industry stakeholders, set priorities, and deliver benefits. Led by airline executives and others from the aviation community with an intimate understanding of shared challenges and opportunities, the NAC conducts its business in public so that deliberations and findings are transparent.

In 2014, the NAC developed a joint three-year implementation plan for delivering new capabilities with near-term benefits to airports across the country. The process of developing and monitoring this plan provided all parties with a better understanding about planning decisions and has bolstered trust and cooperation among all parties. This collaborative plan, delivered to Congress in October 2014 and updated annually since then, outlined milestones for delivering benefits in a one- to three-year timeframe. The high-readiness capabilities are improvements in Performance Based Navigation, Data Communications, surface operations, and improved multiple runway operations, and at the end of fiscal year 2017, the FAA had completed 157 commitments in these areas.[189][190][191][192] A fifth focus area, Northeast Corridor, was established in 2017 to improve operations in the busy airspace between Washington, D.C. and Boston. Commitments for all focus areas are found in the 2019-2021 joint implementation plan.[193] From January 2019 through March 2020, the FAA completed 87 out of 88 commitments.[194]

The FAA established the Interagency Planning Office (IPO) in May 2014 to coordinate actions across the federal government. The IPO leads interagency and international collaboration to resolve complicated challenges critical to NextGen. Its employees leverage stakeholder expertise to identify, research, coordinate, and prioritize shared actions and to bring together the appropriate resources to advance NextGen. The FAA works with the Department of Transportation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, and Department of Commerce.[195][196][197] Aviation cybersecurity, unmanned aircraft systems, and NextGen weather are some of the focus areas.

Engaging with the international aviation community through partnerships and regulatory harmonization is the foundation of the FAA's global leadership initiative.[198] The NextGen International Office, a division within the IPO, focuses on coordinating and sharing information with global partners.[199][200] Its ultimate goal is to support smooth interoperability and harmonization and to provide a mechanism to make air traffic management systems safer and more efficient for air navigation service providers and airspace users. The FAA has international agreements with the European Union, Japan, and Singapore for joint research and development of future air traffic systems. The NextGen International Office also participates with the U.S. Trade Development Agency and Department of Commerce on their agreements with China, Brazil, and Indonesia.


While NextGen programs have demonstrated improvements, several ongoing and potential issues will affect implementation. In many cases, foundational systems are installed on aircraft as well as on the ground. The interoperability of air and ground systems, along with the need to synchronize equipage and other industry investments with FAA programs, has been a primary challenge to date. Standards, regulations, and procedures have to be developed. Program execution planning has to look at cost, schedule, and technical performance. Stakeholder buy-in in areas such as equipage and using new capabilities must be ongoing, and all involved — industry, federal agencies, government partners, and Congress — must be on the same path ahead.[201]


Industry and the FAA need to invest to make progress, and the FAA needs adequate and stable funding. Government shutdowns, furloughs, sequestration, and the lack of a long-term reauthorization make planning and executing modernization efforts more difficult.[202][203] The stop-and-go approach of the annual appropriations process hurts long-term planning. A large, complex federal government agency and an unpredictable appropriations process will, at best, only deliver sporadic and incremental change.[204] The FAA is on or ahead of schedule with some of the most critical programs, including Data Communications, System Wide Information Management and the ground portion of Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast, but to remain on schedule, future NextGen budgets need support through the appropriations process.[205]

NextGen total cost estimates have not increased markedly since Fiscal Year 2004. The FAA's 2016 business case estimate projected the agency's estimated cost through 2030 at $20.6 billion — $2.6 billion more than it projected in 2012 and within the range of the Joint Planning and Development Office’s 2007 estimate of $15 billion–$22 billion.[206]

Using standard budget categories, the projected costs consist of: capital expenditures from the agency's facilities and equipment budget of $16 billion, research and other expenditures in the agency's research and development budget line of $1.5 billion, and operations expenses of $3.1 billion. Of the total, $5.8 billion has already been invested as of 2014. The investment from 2015 to 2030 is projected to be $14.8 billion. The total equipage cost estimate for commercial aircraft from 2015 to 2030 is $4.9 billion, a decrease of $500 million as reported in the 2014 Business Case for NextGen. The equipage cost estimate for general aviation aircraft — jet, turboprop, and piston engine — through 2030 remains constant at $8.9 billion.[207]

To manage NextGen with short-term funding horizons, the FAA rolled out improvements in smaller increments with more program segments to ensure affordability. The Department of Transportation Inspector General has concerns with the FAA's practice of dividing its programs into multiple segments, and funding each segment for a set timeframe or number of milestones because it may mask the final costs.[208]


To encourage equipage, the FAA uses a combination of rules where needed, such as with Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast (ADS-B), and incentives where beneficial, for example with Data Communications (Data Comm), to achieve equipage levels that support the business case for the system under acquisition.

Fewer than 26,000 general aviation aircraft were equipped with ADS-B in July 2017, but as many as 160,000 needed it installed by January 1, 2020, to fly in certain airspace.[209] According to July 2017 FAA data, 1,229 out of nearly 7,000 commercial aircraft and 25,662 of 160,000 general aviation aircraft have purchased and installed ADS-B avionics.[210][211][212] As of August 1, 2020, more than 130,000 U.S. aircraft were properly equipped for ADS-B.[213] Through an FAA incentive and industry investment, the Data Comm program exceeded its goal of 1,900 domestic air carrier aircraft equipped by 2019. As of October 2019, an estimated 7,800 aircraft were equipped.

To achieve the full benefits of trajectory-based operations, users must equip with the required avionics, including Performance Based Navigation, Data Comm, and ADS-B In, and industry agrees on the value of equipping despite the difficulties.[214] The FAA and NextGen Advisory Committee partnered to create a minimum capability list that covers communications, navigation, surveillance, and resiliency. The list serves as a guide of recommended minimum aircraft capabilities and associated equipage needed to derive the maximum benefit from NextGen investments and operational improvements.[215]


Implementing trajectory-based operations will require cultural changes among air traffic controllers and industry. Training and other human factors changes will be necessary for air traffic controllers, pilots, traffic flow managers, and dispatchers.[216] Industry will need to work closely with the FAA as the agency moves to this new model. To maximize throughput, airlines and others have to agree that throughput and predictability are the primary metrics the FAA will use to judge the system's effectiveness. This could be different from, or even in some cases counter to, the traditional flight efficiency metrics used by airlines including reduced delay, reduced track miles, and reduced fuel burn.[217]

Operational integration[edit]

Operational integration of all air-ground capabilities is needed to achieve the full benefits of NextGen. Due to the integrated nature of NextGen, many of its component systems are mutually dependent on one or more other systems. The FAA implements systems through segments that the stakeholder community agrees are useful and that balance costs and benefits. The FAA will have delivered initial implementation of all major planned systems by 2025 but not the full integration necessary to provide all anticipated NextGen benefits.[218][219]

New entrants[edit]

The demand for access to airspace by unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and commercial spacecraft is evolving, and the FAA must accommodate changing needs.[220] The FAA is pursuing ways to safely and efficiently integrate these new entrants into the National Airspace System (NAS) with minimal impact on other NAS users. This involves determining the required automation support, as well as the surveillance, communication, and navigation capabilities that account for the unique performance characteristics of UAS, and space launch and re-entry vehicles. Many NextGen technologies are expected to facilitate this integration.[221]

Environmental impacts[edit]

Communities around airports are concerned about increased environmental problems, particularly noise. Nextgen has created a "rail" or concentrated path of flights in cities across the United States. The new paths often reduce the number of people exposed to noise, but those who get noise receive it far more consistently. [222] [223] Congress set up a coalition to study the noise issues.[224] A Government Accountability Office report on environmental impacts at airports indicated that the changes in flight paths that will accompany NextGen efforts would affect some communities that were previously unaffected or minimally affected by aircraft noise and expose them to increased noise levels.[225] These levels could trigger the need for environmental reviews, as well as raise community concerns. The report found that addressing environmental impacts can delay the implementation of operational changes, and indicated that a systematic approach to addressing these impacts and the resulting community concerns may help reduce such delays.

Through its environment and energy strategy, the FAA is maturing new aircraft technologies, removing the barriers to sustainable alternative jet fuels, developing new operational procedures, advancing analytical capabilities, and implementing policies, standards, and measures to reduce noise and emissions, and improve energy efficiency.

Regarding noise, the FAA has renewed its focus to provide information to the community and solicit aviation user and citizen input when developing procedures. This helps the FAA ensure that proposed airspace and route adjustments consider aviation system safety and efficiency as well as community impact.[226][227]

The FAA has traditionally followed the National Environmental Protection Act process when designing and implementing procedures. However, in recent years, more community involvement is necessary, especially when flight paths are being changed due to Performance Based Navigation implementations. The FAA has increased its public engagement efforts to educate communities about how the agency develops procedures and measures noise, and to listen to residents’ concerns. The FAA has been working closely with airports, airlines, and community officials to determine how the agency can best balance the FAA's pursuit of safer, more efficient flight paths with the needs of nearby communities.[228][229] This new approach to community involvement does not guarantee outcomes that satisfy everyone. However, decisions that take community input into consideration are more likely to reflect the collective public interest, receive broader community acceptance, and experience fewer implementation and post-implementation problems.[230]


As the agency transitions to NextGen, the FAA faces cybersecurity challenges in at least three areas: protecting air traffic control information systems, protecting aircraft avionics that operate and guide aircraft, and clarifying cybersecurity roles and responsibilities among multiple FAA offices.[231] The FAA's Interagency Planning Office (IPO) is involved in the Interagency Core Cyber Team (ICCT) led jointly by the FAA, Department of Defense, and Department of Homeland Security to promote collaboration and federal government leadership in aviation cybersecurity. It applies partner agencies’ cybersecurity expertise, technologies, and tools for shared benefit, and identifies and assesses cybersecurity vulnerabilities in aviation and ways to mitigate them. The IPO also established two ICCT sub-teams — Cyber Exercises and Cyber R&D — to ensure interagency cybersecurity exercises and research yield the greatest benefits.[232] Cyber Guard exercises highlight the shortcomings in cybersecurity guidance and policy. To address these deficits, the ICCT and IPO co-sponsored a survey of cyber guidance, policy, regulations, authorities, and more with the Department of Defense.[233]


The FAA has taken steps to protect its workforce from and limit exposure to the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19, including the use of maximum telework. Because implementation cannot entirely be accomplished remotely, the pandemic has slowed the progress of NextGen.[234]



In May 2017, U.S. Department of Transportation Inspector General Calvin Scovel told Congress that although NextGen has made progress, full implementation of all capabilities and the realization of benefits remains years away.[235][236][237] Of the 156 milestones FAA reported as completed through March 2017, most were attributed to the implementation of wake recategorization and Data Communications (Data Comm) at airport towers. Significant work remains to deploy new Performance Based Navigation (PBN) procedures to capture airspace efficiencies and boost arrival rates, develop surface technologies to enhance capacity on crowded runways and taxiways, and install Data Comm in high-altitude airspace.[238][239]

To continue progress toward major program milestones, the FAA will need to resolve key risk areas that will materially affect the delivery, capabilities, and benefits of modernization priorities. Recognizing these risks with its priority areas, the FAA adjusted its plans and established a three-year rolling implementation plan that will be updated at the beginning of each fiscal year to focus on high-benefit, high-readiness capabilities. The FAA and industry have also agreed on ways to increase communication on these issues.[240]


Another concern is that the FAA's business case does not communicate the range of uncertainty or complex factors associated with NextGen implementation to Congress, aviation stakeholders, or the traveling public, which limits the agency's ability to set realistic expectations for NextGen benefits. The FAA is continuing to work with industry to assess potential benefits from NextGen technologies and the steps required to realize them.[241]

The National Research Council's 2015 “Review of the Next Generation Air Transportation System” report found that the effort emphasizes modernizing aging equipment and systems — a shift from its original vision that is not clear to all stakeholders.[242]


In a report from Lou E. Dixon, principal assistant inspector general for auditing and evaluation, the FAA's major acquisitions since the creation of the Air Traffic Organization continue to experience performance issues. Six programs experienced cost increases totaling $692 million and schedule delays averaging 25 months. The FAA's implementation of this approach has led to unclear and inconsistent reporting on overall program costs, schedules, and benefits. Notwithstanding reforms, several underlying and systemic issues — including overambitious plans, shifting requirements, software development problems, ineffective contract and program management, and unreliable cost and schedule estimates — affect the FAA's ability to introduce new technologies and capabilities that are critical to transitioning to NextGen.[243][244]

During a meeting with air carrier CEOs shortly after taking office, President Donald Trump claimed that the Obama administration spent more than $7 billion to upgrade the system and “totally failed.” However, FAA Administrator Michael Huerta said in a speech that NextGen has already provided $2.7 billion in benefits, and is on track to provide more than $157 billion more by 2030. Huerta also acknowledged that government procurement requirements have slowed the NextGen rollout.[245][246][247]

System architecture[edit]

Nevertheless, modernization is critical, requiring ongoing support. The National Research Council's 2015 “Review of the Next Generation Air Transportation System” report explains that NextGen needs an explicit system architecture — in addition to its existing enterprise architecture — to guide its development, manage risk, and cope with change. To create this architecture, FAA should build an architecture community and also strengthen its work force in several technical fields. The report also examines the incorporation of cybersecurity, unmanned aircraft systems, and human factors into the NextGen architecture. Finally, the report considers NextGen's anticipated costs and benefits, noting that airlines are not motivated to spend money on NextGen because they receive few direct benefits and face schedule uncertainty.[248]


More precise PBN can reduce fuel burn, emissions, and noise exposure for a majority of communities, but the concentration of flight tracks also can increase noise exposure for people who live directly under those flight paths.[249][250][251][252][253] A feature of the NextGen program is GPS-based waypoints, which result in consolidated flight paths for planes. The result of this change is that many localities experience increases in air traffic over previously quiet areas. Complaints have risen with the added traffic and multiple municipalities already have filed suit, with more considering such a move. Many metropolitan airports have been affected, such as Baltimore, Boston, Charlotte, Los Angeles, Phoenix, San Diego, and Washington, D.C.[254][255][256][257][258][259][260][261] Navigation changes have angered residents living with increased noise, and they are pushing back on the FAA.[262] [263][264][265] Some community members believe efforts to reduce noise over homes should have been predicted before NextGen navigation changes went into effect, and that the decisions were a complete failure on the part FAA and its administrator, Michael Huerta.[266]

A committee tasked with recommending ways to reduce airplane noise in California voted in favor of a new flight path similar to one in place before a March 2015 change by the FAA. It would improve and not eliminate NextGen modifications.[267] Some flight patterns were not changed in the Washington, D.C., area after the FAA received community feedback, although changes brought by NextGen were still considered a problem and won't alter the amount of noise in the area.[268]


A May 2017 letter from staff of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure to members of the same committee sent before a meeting to discuss air traffic control privatization noted a 35-year legacy of failed air traffic control modernization management, including NextGen. The letter said the FAA initially described NextGen as fundamentally transforming how air traffic would be managed. In 2015, however, the National Research Council noted that NextGen, as currently executed, was not broadly transformational and that it is a set of programs to implement a suite of incremental changes to the National Airspace System (NAS).[269][270]

Criticism of NextGen has led to a renewed push to reform air traffic control, supported by the Trump Administration, that would move this function from the government to a not-for-profit, independent entity managed by a professional board of directors.[271] It is an effort to improve the pace of NAS modernization, and is supported by Airlines for America, the industry trade organization for the leading U.S. airlines. However, it is resisted by the general aviation community because it may increase their costs of operation.[272][273]


 This article incorporates public domain material from the Federal Aviation Administration document: "Fact Sheet".

  1. ^ 2016 Update to The Business Case for the Next Generation Air Transportation System based on the Future of the NAS Report
  2. ^ "Future of the NAS" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-21.
  3. ^ "Integrated National Plan for the Next Generation Air Transportation System" (PDF).
  4. ^ "Concept of Operations for the Next Generation Air Transportation System" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-10-12.
  5. ^ "Operational Evolution Partnership" (PDF).
  6. ^ "General Dynamics Awarded $12 Million to Support Federal Aviation Administration System Engineering 2020 Program".
  7. ^ "FAA Signs Contract with Honeywell, ACSS".
  8. ^ "FAA Partners With NetJets on Implementing NextGen Technologies".
  9. ^ "Harris Corporation Awarded $331 Million Contract by FAA for Data Communications Integrated Services Program".
  10. ^ "Harris Corporation Awarded $291 Million Contract to Provide Federal Aviation Administration's New National Air Traffic Control Communications System".
  11. ^ "NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force Report Sept. 9, 2009" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-08-12.
  12. ^ "FAA Response to Recommendations of the RTCA NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-08-24.
  13. ^ "RTCA NextGen Advisory Committee".
  14. ^ "Executive Order 13479—Transformation of the National Air Transportation System".
  15. ^ "FAA Modernization and Reform Act (P.L. 112-095) Reports and Plans". Archived from the original on 2014-08-11.
  16. ^ "Beyond Traffic: 2045 Final Report".
  17. ^ "Future of the NAS" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-21.
  18. ^ "The Economic Impact of Civil Aviation on the U.S. Economy January 2020" (PDF). January 1, 2020.
  19. ^ "Operational Performance Assessment September 2015" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-04-29.
  20. ^ "Five Ways NextGen is Reducing Flight Times".
  21. ^ "New Aviation System Will Make Air Travel More Efficient".
  22. ^ "The Benefits of the Next Generation Air Transportation System".
  23. ^ "2016 Update to The Business Case for the Next Generation Air Transportation System based on the Future of the NAS Report" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-08-04.
  24. ^ "2016 Update to The Business Case for the Next Generation Air Transportation System based on the Future of the NAS Report" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-08-04.
  25. ^ "NextGen Update: 2017 Environment and Energy". Archived from the original on 2015-03-13.
  26. ^ "2016 Update to The Business Case for the Next Generation Air Transportation System based on the Future of the NAS Report" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-08-04.
  27. ^ "RTCA NextGen Advisory Committee".
  28. ^ "TBO Vision 2025 Storyboard". October 4, 2018.
  29. ^ "Future of the NAS" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-21.
  30. ^ "Future of the NAS" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-21.
  31. ^ "FAA Declares Steady Progress on NextGen ATC Modernization".
  32. ^ "FAA's NextGen Making Progress, Airline Pilots Union Asserts".
  33. ^ "FAA Ready to Review US Air Traffic Modernization".
  34. ^ "DataComm, ERAM, ADS-B: Huerta Touts NextGen Milestones".
  35. ^ "Future of the NAS" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-21.
  36. ^ "NextGen Data Comm Facilitates Digital DCL".
  37. ^ "LAX unveils Data Comm aircraft texting system designed to reduce flight delays".
  38. ^ "New Data Comm system reduces wait time on SLC runways".
  39. ^ "Pilots, air traffic controllers shifting to text messaging". Archived from the original on 2018-01-19.
  40. ^ "Pilots to start texting at O'Hare, Midway — but it's not what you think".
  41. ^ ""FAA shows off new air-traffic communications at Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport"".
  42. ^ "NYC flights benefiting from new text-based tech, FAA says".
  43. ^ "Pilot text messages are saving you from flight delays".
  44. ^ "FAA Accelerates Data Communications Roll Out to ATC Towers".
  45. ^ "Less chat, more action for airlines, flight controllers".
  46. ^ "A Demo On How Data Comm Is Going to Make Flying Better".
  47. ^ "New direct digital link between tower and cockpit will speed planes on their way".
  48. ^ "NextGen Update 2017 Data Communications". Archived from the original on 2015-03-13.
  49. ^ "Data Comm In the Operation". August 31, 2018. Archived from the original on 2018-09-08.
  50. ^ "Delayed Delivery of En-route CPDLC Messages Fixed, FAA Says". Avionics International. November 13, 2019.
  51. ^ "NextGen Update 2017 Data Communications". Archived from the original on 2015-03-13.
  52. ^ "NextGen Update 2017 Performance Based Navigation". Archived from the original on 2015-03-13.
  53. ^ "PBN NAS Navigation Strategy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-20.
  54. ^ "Instrument Flight Procedures (IFP) Inventory Summary". Federal Aviation Administration. December 11, 2019.
  55. ^ "NextGen Update 2017 Performance Based Navigation". Archived from the original on 2015-03-13.
  56. ^ "PBN NAS Navigation Strategy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-20.
  57. ^ "Planes Are Finally Making Logical Descents Onto American Runways".
  58. ^ "New Analysis Shows Big Benefits at Minneapolis International Airport". Archived from the original on 2017-06-28.
  59. ^ "Changes to Houston's Airspace Bring Millions in Benefits to Local Airports". Archived from the original on 2016-02-01.
  60. ^ "NextGen Update 2017 Performance Based Navigation". Archived from the original on 2015-03-13.
  61. ^ "Optimization of Airspace and Procedures in the Metroplex". Archived from the original on 2014-04-15.
  62. ^ "FAA Makes Airspace Changes for Cleveland/Detroit Metroplex Project". September 5, 2018. Archived from the original on 2018-09-11.
  63. ^ "FAA to Implement Denver Metroplex Project This Week". Federal Aviation Administration. March 25, 2020.
  64. ^ "NextGen Procedures Go Live in Houston Metroplex".
  65. ^ "Performance Based Navigation In the Operation Today". May 7, 2018. Archived from the original on 2018-09-11.
  66. ^ "NextGen Update 2017 Performance Based Navigation". Archived from the original on 2015-03-13.
  67. ^ "Optimization of Airspace and Procedures in the Metroplex". Archived from the original on 2014-04-15.
  68. ^ "FAA Will Move Ahead With Southern California Metroplex Redesign".
  69. ^ "FAA Seeks Feedback on Denver Metroplex Project, Plans Workshops".
  70. ^ "PBN NAS Navigation Strategy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-20.
  71. ^ "NextGen Airports". Archived from the original on 2017-05-02.
  72. ^ "PBN NAS Navigation Strategy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-20.
  73. ^ "Ten Degrees of Separation in Atlanta". Archived from the original on 2014-04-10.
  74. ^ "Aircraft Fly More Efficiently More Often With EoR at Denver". Archived from the original on 2017-04-30.
  75. ^ "NextGen Priorities - Performance Based Navigation". 2019-03-01.
  76. ^ "Future of the NAS" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-21.
  77. ^ "FAA Lays Out 15-Year Plans for PBN NAS Navigation Strategy".
  78. ^ "FAA Successfully Completes Final ADS-B Milestone". FAA News and Updates. October 7, 2019.
  79. ^ "FAA Takes Steps Toward Space-Based ADS-B To Track Aircraft". Aviation Week. December 12, 2019.
  80. ^ "FAA and Aireon Announce Space-Based ADS-B Flight Test Success".
  81. ^ "FAA, Nav Canada and Aireon Test Space-based ADS-B".
  82. ^ "FAA and Aireon announce next-gen ADS-B test success".
  83. ^ "Global Advance Of ADS-B". Archived from the original on 2016-09-26.
  84. ^ "NextGen Update 2017 Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast". Archived from the original on 2015-03-13.
  85. ^ "NextGen Airports". Archived from the original on 2017-05-02.
  86. ^ "ADS-B Wide Area Multilateration". Archived from the original on 2017-05-04.
  87. ^ "Equip ADS-B Benefits". Federal Aviation Administration. October 31, 2019.
  88. ^ "ADS-B: Saving the day". 2020-01-09. Retrieved 2020-08-21.
  89. ^ "Owners Praise ADS-B Traffic, Weather".
  90. ^ "The Cost of ADS-B Compliance: You're Looking at it Wrong".
  91. ^ "ADS-B Traffic Awareness System". Archived from the original on 2017-05-02.
  92. ^ "Better Collision Avoidance with NextGen". Archived from the original on 2014-04-02.
  93. ^ "ACAS X: The reinvention of ACAS II/TCAS II cloaks major advances in a familiar interface and enables rapid upgrades".
  94. ^ "ACSS Among Teams Advancing Collision Avoidance for Unmanned Aircraft".
  95. ^ "ACAS X - SKYbrary Aviation Safety". Retrieved 2020-08-24.
  96. ^ "In-Trail Procedures: Saving Fuel and Boosting Pilots' Situational Awareness in Oceanic Airspace". Archived from the original on 2017-01-22.
  97. ^ "ADS-B Interval Management Applications". Archived from the original on 2017-04-30.
  98. ^ "Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast Operator Investments". Archived from the original on 2017-05-05.
  99. ^ "Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI) Assisted Visual Separation (CAVS) Benefits Analysis Report" (PDF). Federal Aviation Administration. May 4, 2016.
  100. ^ "NASA To Equip Alaska Airlines With ADS-B In Tool". Archived from the original on 2016-11-02.
  101. ^ "Alaska Airlines Could Save $5 Million Annually with New Data Management Installation".
  102. ^ "NASA-developed technology aims to save commercial airlines fuel, time".
  103. ^ "Terminal Automation Modernization and Replacement". Archived from the original on 2009-07-14.
  104. ^ "FAA Declares New En Route Automation System Is Operational".
  105. ^ "NextGen Enters Critical Era".
  106. ^ "En Route Automation Modernization". Archived from the original on 2009-07-14.
  107. ^ "Paying It Forward".
  108. ^ "Cutting-Edge Tools for Air Traffic Controllers". Archived from the original on 2017-05-02.
  109. ^ "NextGen Update 2017 Automation". Archived from the original on 2017-04-30.
  110. ^ "Traffic Flow Management System".
  111. ^ "NextGen Update 2017 Decision Support Systems". Archived from the original on 2015-03-13.
  112. ^ "NASA Delivers New Air Traffic Spacing Tool to FAA".
  113. ^ "Phoenix Air Traffic Controllers look to the future with NextGen Technology". Archived from the original on 2015-05-06.
  114. ^ "NextGen Opens a Window to Airports". Archived from the original on 2015-08-14.
  115. ^ "Daily Memo: COVID-19 Slows The Progress Of FAA's NextGen Program". Aviation Week. August 7, 2020.
  116. ^ "NextGen Update 2017 Decision Support Systems". Archived from the original on 2015-03-13.
  117. ^ "Advanced Technologies and Oceanic Procedures". Archived from the original on 2009-07-14.
  118. ^ "Ocean Flying Becoming a Breeze with NextGen". Archived from the original on 2014-02-22.
  119. ^ "NextGen Operational Performance Assessment September 2015" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-04-29.
  120. ^ "SWIM program overview". Archived from the original on 2015-03-05.
  121. ^ "Evaluating Future Global SWIM Implementation".
  122. ^ "How NextGen Works". Retrieved 2020-08-24.
  123. ^ "Connecting System Wide Information Management (SWIM) to the Cloud". Connected Aviation Today. February 21, 2019.
  124. ^ "NextGen Update: 2017 System Wide Information Management". Archived from the original on 2015-03-13.
  125. ^ "NextGen Operational Performance Assessment September 2015" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-04-29.
  126. ^ "WIMAX Forum".
  127. ^ "What to Expect at the 2017 AEEC/AMC Conference".
  128. ^ "NextGen Weather". Archived from the original on 2014-12-30.
  129. ^ "FAQ: Weather Delay". Retrieved 2020-08-24.
  130. ^ "The pain of rain that's mainly on the planes".
  131. ^ "NextGen Weather Processor (NWP)". Retrieved 2020-08-24.
  132. ^ "Common Support Services - Weather (CSS-Wx)". Retrieved 2020-08-24.
  133. ^ "Weather Technology in the Cockpit". Retrieved 2020-08-24.
  134. ^ "FAA Teams Working to Improve Quality of Available Weather Information to Pilots". Archived from the original on 2018-01-20.
  135. ^ "The FAA's Weather Technology in the Cockpit Program - An Overview and Discussion of Challenges Ahead".
  136. ^ "NextGen Priorities Joint Implementation Plan Executive Report Rolling Plan 2017-2019" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-01-28.
  137. ^ "NextGen Priorities - Multiple Runway Operations". Archived from the original on 2014-10-30.
  138. ^ "NextGen Operational Performance Assessment September 2015" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-04-29.
  139. ^ "NextGen Update: 2017 NextGen Advisory Committee". Archived from the original on 2015-03-13.
  140. ^ "NextGen Priorities Joint Implementation Plan Executive Report Rolling Plan 2017-2019" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-01-28.
  141. ^ "NextGen Priorities Joint Implementation Plan 2017-2019" (PDF). September 23, 2016.
  142. ^ "NextGen Advisory Committee NextGen Priorities Joint Implementation Plan 2019-2021" (PDF). June 25, 2019.
  143. ^ "NextGen Airports". Archived from the original on 2017-05-02.
  144. ^ "NextGen Airports". Archived from the original on 2018-05-18.
  145. ^ "Performance Reporting – Capabilities". Retrieved 2020-08-24.
  146. ^ "'Ghost planes' display aid at O'Hare helping safety, capacity problems".
  147. ^ "NextGen Tool Helps Aircraft Stay the Course". Archived from the original on 2014-04-10.
  148. ^ "Wake re-categorization begins at Louisville".
  149. ^ "Improved Approaches and Low-Visibility Operations". Retrieved 2020-09-02.
  150. ^ "Performance Reporting – Capabilities". Retrieved 2020-09-02.
  151. ^ "New FAA Rules Let Technology Replace Natural Vision". Archived from the original on 2017-01-11.
  152. ^ "FAA Expands Enhanced Vision Capabilities".
  153. ^ "NextGen Operator Investments". Archived from the original on 2017-05-02.
  154. ^ "NextGen Operational Performance Assessment September 2015" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-04-29.
  155. ^ "2016 Update to The Business Case for the Next Generation Air Transportation System based on the Future of the NAS Report" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-08-04.
  156. ^ "The Benefits of the Next Generation Air Transportation System".
  157. ^ "Tailored Arrivals: Idling Down to the Final Approach".
  158. ^ "Esri Solution Helps Airports Meet New FAA Rules".
  159. ^ "Airports GIS and Electronic Airport Layout Plan (eALP)". Archived from the original on 2011-07-11.
  160. ^ "Aviation Environmental and Energy Policy Statement" (PDF). July 2012.
  161. ^ "New Quieter Aircraft". Federal Aviation Administration. October 13, 2017.
  162. ^ "What's All The Noise About Airport Noise" (PDF). February 5, 2015.
  163. ^ "NextGen Update: 2017 Environment and Energy". Archived from the original on 2015-03-13.
  164. ^ "Stage 5 Airplane Noise Standards". Federal Register. October 4, 2017.
  165. ^ "FAA To Re-Evaluate Method for Measuring Effects of Aircraft Noise". Federal Aviation Administration. May 7, 2015.
  166. ^ "Research Review of Selected Aviation Noise Issues by Federal Interagency Committee on Aviation Noise" (PDF). April 2018.
  167. ^ "Supersonic Aircraft Notice of Proposed Rulemaking". Federal Aviation Administration. March 30, 2020.
  168. ^ "Continuous Lower Energy, Emissions, and Noise Program". Archived from the original on 2011-11-01.
  169. ^ "Fact Sheet – Continuous Lower Energy, Emissions, and Noise II (CLEEN II Program)". Archived from the original on 2017-01-31.
  170. ^ "Aircraft Engine, Airframe, and Fuel Technology". Archived from the original on 2017-05-05.
  171. ^ "New Alternative Jet Fuel Approved". Retrieved 2020-08-21.
  172. ^ "United Airlines is flying on biofuels. Here's why that's a really big deal".
  173. ^ "NextGen Update 2017 Fuel Technology". Archived from the original on 2015-03-13.
  174. ^ "FAA Issues Update on Unleaded Avgas Research". AOPA. July 10, 2019.
  175. ^ "Statement by FAA Administrator Michael Huerta on Global Carbon Emissions Standards Agreement". Federal Aviation Administration. February 8, 2016.
  176. ^ "ICAO Council adopts important environmental standard". ICAO. March 13, 2020.
  177. ^ "NextGen portfolio System Safety Management". Archived from the original on 2017-05-02.
  178. ^ "NextGen Update 2017 Safety". Archived from the original on 2015-03-12.
  179. ^ "How the FAA and Airlines Sleuth for Safety". Archived from the original on 2015-03-27.
  180. ^ "Fact Sheet – Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing Program". Archived from the original on 2015-02-21.
  181. ^ "NextGen Portfolio - System Safety Management". Archived from the original on 2017-05-02.
  182. ^ "NextGen Update 2017 Safety". Archived from the original on 2015-03-12.
  183. ^ "Fact Sheet – Commercial Aviation Safety Team". Archived from the original on 2015-03-31.
  184. ^ "NextGen Update 2017 Workforce Engagement". Archived from the original on 2015-03-13.
  185. ^ "NATCA Praises Collaborative Relationship With FAA, Progress on NextGen".
  186. ^ "Future of the NAS" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-21.
  187. ^ "NextGen Update 2017 Workforce Engagement". Archived from the original on 2015-03-13.
  188. ^ "NextGen Committee Recommends Modernization Priorities".
  189. ^ "The Four New Priorities of NextGen".
  190. ^ "A missed opportunity for the aviation community".
  191. ^ "NextGen expands digital communications between pilots, tower".
  192. ^ "Airspace Integration Takes More Than Tech".
  193. ^ "NextGen Advisory Committee NextGen Priorities Joint Implementation Plan CY2019-2021" (PDF). Federal Aviation Administration. June 2019.
  194. ^ "NextGen Advisory Committee NextGen Priorities Joint Implementation Plan CY2019-2021 Update" (PDF). Federal Aviation Administration. August 2020.
  195. ^ "Charlotte airport to get new system to reduce tarmac wait times next year".
  196. ^ "NASA, FAA collaboration spawns TSAS tool".
  197. ^ "Multifunction Phase Array Radar (MPAR)".
  198. ^ "RTCA 2015: Global Harmonization Through Industry Collaboration".
  199. ^ "FAA Administrator Focuses on the Caribbean".
  200. ^ "FAA and Brazil Strengthen Aviation Partnership".
  201. ^ "2017 Chief NextGen Officer report" (PDF).
  202. ^ "Collaboration Is Woven Into Our Fabric". Archived from the original on 2017-06-27.
  203. ^ "FAA Shutdown Already Delaying Data Comm Transition to En Route Airspace". Avionics International. January 4, 2019.
  204. ^ "Smarter Skies FAQ".
  205. ^ "Story of NextGen". Missing or empty |url= (help)
  206. ^ "GAO report Nov. 17, 2016".
  207. ^ "2016 Update to The Business Case for the Next Generation Air Transportation System based on the Future of the NAS Report" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-08-04.
  208. ^ "Total Costs, Schedules, and Benefits of FAA's NextGen Transformational Programs Remain Uncertain".
  209. ^ "FAA Speech at Sun 'N Fun". Archived from the original on 2017-04-27.
  210. ^ "New Report Outlines Avionics Equipage Issues for NextGen".
  211. ^ "FAA faces 'programmatic challenges' with NextGen".
  212. ^ "Can private air traffic control fix flying?".
  213. ^ "ADS-B Current Equipage Levels". Federal Aviation Administration. August 1, 2020.
  214. ^ "NAC Updates on Latest Benefits, Challenges for NextGen Program".
  215. ^ "Minimum Capability List to Achieve Optimal NextGen Benefits" (PDF). Federal Aviation Administration. May 2020.
  216. ^ "Air traffic control system desperately needs update, not upheaval".
  217. ^ "2017 Chief NextGen Officer report" (PDF).
  218. ^ "Story of NextGen". Missing or empty |url= (help)
  219. ^ "2017 Chief NextGen Officer report" (PDF).
  220. ^ "America's Plan to Somehow Make Drones Not Ruin the Skies".
  221. ^ "Future of the NAS" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-21.
  222. ^ "NextGen Nextgen and Noise Pollution the FAAs Carte Blanche to Send Planes Screaming Over Our Houses". Archived from the original on 2019-08-18. Retrieved 2019-08-18.
  223. ^ "New flight paths lead to airplane noise complaints across US". AP NEWS. Retrieved 2020-08-21.
  224. ^ "National Quiet Skies Coalition". Archived from the original on 2019-08-18. Retrieved 2019-08-18.
  225. ^ "Aviation and the Environment: Systematically Addressing Environmental Impacts and Community Concerns Can Help Airports Reduce Project Delays".
  226. ^ "FAA plans major study of U.S. airport noise".
  227. ^ "Aircraft Noise Issues". Archived from the original on 2012-01-10.
  228. ^ "PBN NAS Navigation Strategy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-20.
  229. ^ "ATCA Conference Keynote Address". Archived from the original on 2016-11-01.
  230. ^ "PBN NAS Navigation Strategy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-20.
  231. ^ "Air Traffic Control: FAA Needs a More Comprehensive Approach to Address Cybersecurity As Agency Transitions to NextGen".
  232. ^ "NextGen Update Interagency Planning Agency". Archived from the original on 2017-11-07.
  233. ^ "Cyber Guard 2016 Seeks to Manage Complexity in Invisible Domain".
  234. ^ "Daily Memo: COVID-19 Slows The Progress Of FAA's NextGen Program". Aviation Week. August 7, 2020.
  235. ^ "Inspector General Slams FAA Deployment of NextGen".
  236. ^ "Air Traffic Control Newsletter #138".
  237. ^ "Total Costs, Schedules, and Benefits of FAA's NextGen Transformational Programs Remain Uncertain".
  238. ^ "GOP continues push to privatize air traffic control".
  239. ^ "Why Trump's plan to privatize air traffic control could end up costing more".
  240. ^ "Observations on FAA's Efforts To Implement Reforms and Modernize the National Airspace System".
  241. ^ "U.S. Department of Transportation letter to Rep. Bill Shuster and Rep. Frank LoBiondo on NextGen benefits projections" (PDF).
  242. ^ "A Review of the Next Generation Air Transportation System: Implications and Importance of System Architecture" (PDF).
  243. ^ "Inspector General Report Shows FAA Is Failing and Why a Non-Profit Should Manage Air Traffic Control".
  244. ^ "FAA Reforms Have Not Achieved Expected Cost, Efficiency, and Modernization Outcomes".
  245. ^ "Trump loves his rural base, but will they lose under his plan to privatize FAA?".
  246. ^ "FAA head defends air traffic improvements which Trump called 'out of whack'".
  247. ^ "No price tag, end date for FAA's air traffic control plan". Archived from the original on 2017-09-07.
  248. ^ "FAA Should 'Reset Expectations' for Next Generation Air Transportation System".
  249. ^ "NextGen Noise: RNP's concentrated IMPACT may justify substantive change in FAA policies under a proper study".
  250. ^ "FAA facing backlash over noise issues created by PBN flight paths". Archived from the original on 2016-10-21.
  251. ^ "Advances in airport technology mean sleepless nights for some".
  252. ^ "A Closer Look at How FAA is 'Tone-Deaf' on NextGen Noise Impacts".
  253. ^ "Implications of Administration Environmental Requirements for NextGen" (PDF).
  254. ^ "Residents near BWI angry about increased jet traffic and noise, want FAA to act".
  255. ^ "City update on airplane noise".
  256. ^ "Could airport noise be coming to your neighborhood? Charlotte flight paths may change".
  257. ^ "Is Massive Jetliner Noise Coming to Unsuspecting L.A.?".
  258. ^ "Privatizing Air Traffic: How Will It Fly In Queens?".
  259. ^ "New law may offer hope to residents plagued by aircraft noise".
  260. ^ "Residents, officials lobbying against FAA flight path proposal".
  261. ^ "The intolerable level of airline noise post-NextGen".
  262. ^ "FAA to Face NextGen Lawsuit in Phoenix". Aviation Today. 2015-06-03. Retrieved 2020-08-20.
  263. ^ Zipkin, Amy (2019-11-18). "GPS for Air Travel Came With Big Downsides: Noise, Then Lawsuits". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-08-20.
  264. ^ "Airport noise complainers' sound and fury signify nothing to the FAA". The Washington Post. November 27, 2018.
  265. ^
  266. ^ "Residents, city officials gear up to fight increased airplane noise". Palo Alto Online. October 24, 2014.
  267. ^ "FAA committee: Scrap existing flight path".
  268. ^ "FAA drops plan to change flight patterns in region".
  269. ^ "Committee Hearing on "The Need to Reform FAA and Air Traffic Control to Build a 21st Century Aviation System for America"" (PDF).
  270. ^ "Latest Inspector General Report Underscores Need for Air Traffic Control Reform".
  271. ^ "President Donald J. Trump's Principles for Reforming the U.S. Air Traffic Control System".
  272. ^ "Citizens For On Time Flights".
  273. ^ "So What's the Deal With Air Traffic Control Reform?".

External links[edit]