Non-profit technology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nonprofit technology is the deliberative use of technology by nonprofit organizations to maximize potential in numerous areas, primarily in supporting the organization mission and meeting reporting requirements to funders and regulators.

Types of technology do not differ between nonprofit and for profit organizations. Nonprofit technology is differentiated by specific strategies and purposes. Numerous nonprofit organizations approach technology with an emphasis on cost effectiveness due to limited budgets. Information technology in particular offers low-cost solutions for non profits to address administrative, service and marketing needs. Technology deployment grants nonprofits the opportunity to better allocate staff resources away from administrative tasks to focus on direct services provided by the organization.[1]

Definitional issues[edit]

Due to the topic's inherent breadth of reach and the constantly changing nature of technology in general, the sphere of nonprofit technology is somewhat difficult to define. Despite this, in order to provide a stable foundation upon which the remainder of this discussion can stand, it is necessary to engage in laying a groundwork of both baseline and integrated definitional constructs.

Nonprofit technology can be generally defined as any technological tool that assists a nonprofit organization by helping it to work with greater social impact in forwarding the overall organizational mission.[2] Technology is essential to effectively advancing and managing a nonprofit, playing an important role in the advertisement of goods and services offered, the communication of mission, and the recruitment of volunteers among other things.[3] From thoughtful utilization to enhance both internal and external organizational communication efforts, to increased ability to measure, evaluate, and more successfully track and engage specific initiatives, the use of technology within the nonprofit sector is wide-ranging.[4]

Technology use associated with nonprofits is not dedicated in nature, that is, technologies and specific uses of such technology by nonprofits cannot be linked solely to the nonprofit sector. Because of this, constructing a definition of nonprofit technology is based in large part on use.


Nonprofit organizations use computers, Internet and other networking technology for a number of tasks, including volunteer management and support, donor management, client tracking and support, project management, human resources (paid staff) management, financial accounting, program evaluation, research, marketing, activism and collaboration. Nonprofit organizations that engage in income-generation activities, such as ticket sales, may also use technology for these functions.

Some technology programs are created specifically for use by nonprofit organizations. For instance, there are more than 30 software packages designed for nonprofits to use to analyse donations,[5] manage volunteers.[6] There is software designed to help in the management of animal shelters,[7] software to help nonprofit manage pets, animal rescue, county code management[8] software to help nonprofit performing arts groups sell tickets and manage donors, software to manage sports clubs,[9] and on and on.

Nonprofit organizations also use both proprietary and open-source software, as well as various online tools (the World Wide Web, email, online social networking,[10] wikis, volunteer web blogs[11] micro-blogging, etc.), that are also used by for-profit businesses. Nonprofit groups may leverage web-based services in their media outreach, using online newswires such as Nonprofit to disseminate their press releases.[12]

Because of their limited budgets, nonprofit organizations may not be able to upgrade their hardware or software, buy computers or Internet tools, or provide technology training for staff to the degree of for-profit businesses. This means that, often, nonprofit organizations can be on the wrong side of the digital divide.

Benefits of technology[edit]

Implemented correctly, technology stands to benefit nonprofits in a variety of ways. One obvious benefit is the dissemination of information. Technological tools (e.g., computers and cellular telephones) and platforms (e.g., Facebook and Twitter) allow for the aggregation and wide-scale distribution of knowledge and information. To the extent that tools and platforms can be integrated, nonprofits may better serve themselves and their clients.

Krause and Quick discussed a melding of this sort in the area of "maternal health interventions".[13] By combining Facebook's social networking platform with SMS text messaging, the Women's Refugee Commission (WRC) was able to launch a new initiative, which it dubbed "Mama." Mama's mission is to bring clinical practitioners together in a virtual forum (i.e., their Facebook page) for purposes of information sharing and support. Given the remote locales of many maternal health workers, regular access to the Internet can prove difficult, if not impossible.[13] But with the help of SMS messaging, this problem becomes entirely manageable.

The Mama platform readily accepts text messages sent from anywhere in the world. These messages then appear, automatically, on the Mama Facebook page, allowing practitioners with more reliable access to the Internet a chance to appraise the situation and respond.[13] Once the Mama community arrives at a consensus, a text message is dispatched back to the original practitioner. Although this process is a bit deliberative, it is nonetheless instrumental in achieving beneficial outcomes for both the organization and the population it aims to serve.[13] Without an SMS-Facebook linkage, maternal health workers embedded deep within the field would effectively be cut off from both colleagues and information. Technology, it would seem, is aptly suited for bridging this spatial divide.

Cost reductions and efficiency improvements may also encourage nonprofits to adopt new digital and information technologies. According to Luksetich et al., administrative expenses are particularly bothersome for nonprofits and their stakeholders.[14] To the extent, then, that technology can be viewed as a long-term administrative cost-saver, it becomes increasingly likely that nonprofits will become adopters of information technology. Hamann and Bezboruah advanced this premise in a recent study, noting that nonprofits may have greater incentive to deploy technology for the accomplishment of administrative tasks as opposed to provision-of-care tasks.[15]

A final and largely unquantifiable benefit of nonprofit technology is the degree to which these tools can and do save lives. Mama, in particular, has developed a "Lives Saved Counter" to allow members to document each time they save a "woman's, girl's, or newborn's life".[13] The Counter is significant because it acknowledges both individual achievement and evidence-based best practices. Moreover, it stands as a constant reminder and celebration of life, contrasting markedly with the conventional practices in this field, which tend to document only the deaths of mothers.[13]

Social media[edit]

The use of social media by nonprofits should follow a stewardship model that includes acts of reciprocity, responsibility, and accountability in an effort to nurture nonprofit relationships and place supporters at the forefront.[16] Referencing organizational partners and supporters is one way in which these ideals can be expressed through social media use.[16] Furthermore, listing the nonprofits specific use of donations and volunteers as well as posting the names of board members and mission statement can cover the responsibility and accountability components.[16]

And although most social media sites provide free services, for social media to be most effective, organizations must provide on-going interactional experiences for users, which requires additional man-hours.[16] It is estimated that for a mid-size nonprofit with revenue between $1 and $5 million annually, having a social media presence will cost, on average, $11 thousand annually to attain an adequate level of interaction.[17] Examples of such interactional components for a nonprofit website might include: downloadable video, RSS feeds, chat rooms, polls or surveys, linked publications and always, contact information.[16]

In a poll conducted with mid-sized nonprofit organizations, 51 percent reported that between one and five hours were spent weekly attending to social media.[17] Additionally, as the nonprofits social media presence grew, more hours were required to sustain the same level of interaction. Yet, these same nonprofit respondents, that had been using social media for at least 12 months, reported less than stellar results for attracting new donors or volunteers, which had been one of the main motivations for establishing a social media presence.[17] Therefore, if a nonprofit organization is insistent on an established social media presence, it is advised to continue direct channels of communication such as direct mailings which still outperforms email and social media marketing.[17]

Practitioners/sources of training and support[edit]

Whereas a for-profit business may have the budget to hire a full-time staff member or part-time consultant to help with computer and Internet technology use, nonprofit organizations usually have fewer financial resources and, therefore, may not be able to hire a full-time staff person to manage and support technology use. While there are nonprofits that can afford to pay staff devoted to managing and supporting the nonprofits technology needs, many of those who support nonprofits in their technology use are staff members who have different primary roles (called accidental techies) and volunteers.

Those providing support to nonprofit organizations regarding their use of computers, the Internet and networking technologies are sometimes known as eRiders or circuit riders, or more broadly as NTAPs (Nonprofit Technology Assistance Providers).

A membership association for people volunteering or working for pay to support nonprofit technology is NTEN: The Nonprofit Technology Enterprise Network.

Sources of hardware and software[edit]

A variety of organizations support NPOs' acquisition of technology, either hardware or software.

Certain NPOs (for example Free Geek or Nonprofit Technology Resources) support local NPOs with discounted refurbished personal computers.

In the United States and Canada, a web-based membership association that provides non-profit organizations with discounts on products and services, including technology providers, is the Non-Profit Purchasing Group.

For developing areas or nations, technology may be available from organizations mentioned in Computer technology for developing areas.

Best practices/guiding principles for effective adoption[edit]

A number of contributing factors have effected non-profits' ability to adopt information technology in recent history. Cutbacks in public sector services, decreases in government spending, increased scrutiny on the public sector, increased competition and increased financial transparency are all issues facing non-profit organizations today.[18] Due to these issues, it has become increasingly important for non-profits to be aware of best practices and potential pitfalls when adopting effective IT practices in the public sector.

Planning has become one of the most important practices for the successful strategic utilization of information technology.[19] A 2003 study found that 79 percent of organizations in 2003 (up from 55 percent in 2000) had some sort of "strategic plan" specifically for the use of the Internet, tending to be "medium-sized charities with medium income and larger Web budgets, as well as those that set their sites up earlier and update them more frequently."[20] Among the most important practices in IT planning are budgeting, training and staffing. A 2007 study from the Public Administration Review shows that the majority of nonprofits budget for purchasing and upgrading hardware (57 percent) and software (58 percent), as well as computer maintenance (63 percent), but only 36 percent budget for computer-related training. However, these planning methods receive only 9 percent of the budget after personnel costs are removed, which is of particular importance because 56 percent of nonprofits report that less than 2 percent is available for these essential IT activities. The amount set aside for training varies considerablydepending on overall budgets, making training a luxury for lower-budget organizations.[21]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Jaskyte, Kristina (2012). "Exploring Potential for Information Technology Innovation in Nonprofit Organizations". Journal of Technology in Human Services. 30 (2): 118–127. doi:10.1080/15228835.2012.695564. S2CID 143613156.
  2. ^ "About NTEN: The Nonprofit Technology Network | NTEN". Archived from the original on 2013-12-05. Retrieved 2013-12-01.
  3. ^ Managing non profit IT [dead link]
  4. ^ "Technology | National Council of Nonprofits". Archived from the original on 2013-12-03. Retrieved 2013-12-01.
  5. ^ "Donor management and analytics". Sydney. Archived from the original on July 25, 2012.
  6. ^ Cravens, Jayne (March 16, 2009). "Listing of Volunteer Management Software". Austin: Coyote Communications.
  7. ^ "Animal Shelter Manager". rawsontetley. March 29, 2009.
  8. ^ "County Pet Animal Shelter Manager". Waltair Park, Vizag Shelter Care. October 22, 2016.
  9. ^ "Sports Club Manager". Norkfolk, United Kingdom. March 29, 2009.
  10. ^ "DonorDrive Overview". June 22, 2009.
  11. ^ "Alabama Charity's Blog".
  12. ^ "Make Me Media Savvy: The Art of Working With the Press
  13. ^ a b c d e f Krause, Sandra; Diana Quick (2011). "Using Technology to Help Save Mothers and Babies". Forced Migration Review. 38: 16–17.
  14. ^ Luksetich, W.; M. E. Edwards; T. M. Carroll (2000). "Organizational form and nursing home behavior". Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 29 (2): 255–279. CiteSeerX doi:10.1177/0899764000292003. S2CID 145068143.
  15. ^ Hamann, D. J.; Bezboruah, K. C. (2013). "Utilization of technology by long-term care providers: Comparisons between for-profit and nonprofit institutions". Journal of Aging & Health. 25 (4): 535–544. doi:10.1177/0898264313480238. PMID 23509114. S2CID 20302505.
  16. ^ a b c d e Waters, Richard D.; Kristen LeBlanc Feneley (25 June 2013). "Virtual stewardship in the age of new media: have nonprofit organizations' moved beyond Web 1.0 strategies?". International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing. 18 (3): 216–230. doi:10.1002/nvsm.1469.
  17. ^ a b c d Ogden, Timothy N.; Laura Starita (November 2009). "About us". Philanthropy Action: 1–21.
  18. ^ Adams , Carolyn T. , and Felice D. Perlmutter, 1995. Leadership in Hard Times: Are Nonprofits Well Served? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 24 ( 3 ): 253 – 62
  19. ^ Buhalis , Dimitrios . 1998 . Strategic Use of Information Technologies in the Tourism Industry. Tourism Management 19 ( 5 ): 409 – 21
  20. ^ Spigelman , Ariel , and Elisha Evans . 2004 . Virtual Promise — From Rhetoric to Reality: A Report on Charities' Use of the Internet between 2000 – 2004 London: nfpSynergy
  21. ^ Hackler, Darrene; Saxton, Gregory D. Public Administration Review. May2007, Vol. 67 Issue 3, p474-487. 14p. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00730.x. , Database: Political Science Complete

External links[edit]

  • TechSoup: Technology product donations, data services, and access to technical support for charities, NGOs, and nonprofits
  • Nonprofit Technology Network (NTEN): membership association for those interested in nonprofit technology
  • Idealware: Reviews and resources to help nonprofits choose software
  • TechChange: Courses and learning resources on technology and social change topics