Northern Ireland Protocol
|Part of a series of articles on|
Glossary of terms
|EU portal · UK portal|
The Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland, commonly abbreviated to the Northern Ireland Protocol, is a protocol to the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement that governs the unique customs and immigration issues at the border in the island of Ireland between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the European Union, and on some aspects of trade in goods between Northern Ireland and the rest of the United Kingdom. Its terms were negotiated in 2019 and agreed and concluded in December 2020. Due to the thirty-year internecine conflict in Northern Ireland, the UK-Ireland border has had a special status since that conflict was ended by the Belfast Agreement/Good Friday Agreement of 1998. As part of the Northern Ireland Peace Process, the border has been largely invisible, without any physical barrier or custom checks on its many crossing points; this arrangement was made possible by both countries' common membership of both the EU's Single Market and Customs Union and of their Common Travel Area.
Upon the UK's withdrawal from the European Union, the border in Ireland became the only land border between the UK and EU. EU single market and UK internal market provisions require certain customs checks and trade controls at their external borders. The Northern Ireland Protocol is intended to protect the EU single market, while avoiding imposition of a 'hard border' that might incite a recurrence of conflict and destabilise the relative peace that has held since the end of the Troubles.
Under the Protocol, Northern Ireland is formally outside the EU single market, but EU free movement of goods rules and EU Customs Union rules still apply; this ensures there are no customs checks or controls between Northern Ireland and the rest of the island. In place of an Ireland/Northern Ireland land border, the protocol has created a de facto customs border down the Irish Sea for customs purposes, separating Northern Ireland from the island of Great Britain, to the disquiet of prominent Unionists.
The British and Irish Governments: (...)
Wishing to develop still further the unique relationship between their peoples and the close co-operation between their countries as friendly neighbours and as partners in the European Union;
Reaffirming their commitment to the principles of partnership, equality and mutual respect and to the protection of civil, political, social, economic and cultural rights in their respective jurisdictions;
Have agreed as follows:
British-Irish Agreement (appended to the Good Friday Agreement)
In 1921, the western and southern four-fifths of the island of Ireland seceded from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland as the Irish Free State (renamed in 1937 as 'Ireland' (Irish: Éire) and 'described' in 1948 as the Republic of Ireland). The north-eastern fifth, renamed Northern Ireland, remained by design part of the United Kingdom and the UK became the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The 'province' (as Northern Ireland is often known) had suffered sectarian tensions and at times outbreaks of serious violence between Unionists (who wish to remain part of the UK) that trace their origin to the Plantation of Ulster and Nationalists (who seek a united Ireland). The most recent of these, known as 'the Troubles', occurred during the period from the late 1960s to the late 1990s. One of its features was that the Republic of Ireland–United Kingdom border was heavily fortified and militarised. In 1998, the Belfast (or Good Friday) Agreement brought the conflict to an end and the border was demilitarised. Since both states were members of the European Union at the time and operate a Common Travel Area, there was no other border infrastructure.
In the Brexit referendum of 2016, nearly 56% of Northern Irish voters opted to remain in the EU, though the overall UK-wide vote was 52% to leave. A subsequent study suggests that leave was supported by a majority of unionists (66%), while remain was supported by a majority of nationalists (88%) and those who did not identify as unionist or nationalist (70%).
Following the Brexit referendum, the first May government decided that not only should the United Kingdom leave the European Union but also that it should leave the European Union Customs Union and the European Single Market. This meant that a customs and regulatory border would arise between the UK and the EU. Whilst the sea border between Great Britain and continental Europe was expected to present manageable challenges, the UK/EU border in Ireland was recognised as having rather more intractable issues. These were summarised in what became known as the Brexit Trilemma, because of three competing objectives: no hard border on the island; no customs border in the Irish Sea; and no British participation in the European Single Market and the European Union Customs Union. It is not possible to have all three.
No technology solution to address these issues has been designed yet or implemented anywhere in the world, let alone in such a unique and highly sensitive context as the Northern Ireland border.
Theresa May, 20 July 2018
The Protocol replaced the Irish backstop, the rejected first attempt to resolve the trilemma. The 'backstop' (also formally called the Northern Ireland Protocol) was an appendix to a draft Brexit withdrawal agreement developed by the May government and the European Commission in December 2017 and finalised in November 2018. This proposal provided for the UK as a whole to have a common customs territory with the EU until a solution was delivered that would avoid the need for evident customs controls at the UK/EU border in Ireland and also avoid any customs controls within the UK (between Northern Ireland and Great Britain). The 'backstop' element was that the arrangement would have continued to apply potentially indefinitely unless the UK and the EU were jointly to agree on a different arrangement for the border in Ireland.
The Irish government, Sinn Féin, the SDLP and the cross-community Alliance Party and Green Party supported the backstop proposal, whereas the DUP, UUP and TUV were opposed. By early 2019, the Westminster Parliament had voted three times against ratifying this version of Withdrawal Agreement and thus also rejected the backstop.
Attempted changes to the backstop concept
After becoming Prime Minister on 24 July 2019, Boris Johnson sought to remove the backstop; this was refused by the EU, who wanted a legally operational solution. On 2 October, Johnson presented a potential replacement for the 2018 Irish backstop, proposing that Northern Ireland stay aligned with the EU on product standards but remain in the UK customs territory. This would necessitate product checks between Great Britain and Northern Ireland, but no customs checks for goods expected to stay within the UK. For the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic, his proposal would entail customs checks between Northern Ireland and the Republic (potentially assisted by unspecified technology implemented distantly from the border) but no product and safety standard checks within the island of Ireland. This was rejected by the EU.
Protocol principle agreed
On 10 October 2019, Johnson and the Irish Taoiseach (Prime Minister) Leo Varadkar held "very positive and very promising" talks that led to a resumption in negotiations, and a week later, on 17 October, Johnson and Jean-Claude Juncker announced that they had reached agreement (subject to ratification) on a new Withdrawal Agreement which replaced the backstop with a new protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland.
In the formally negotiated Withdrawal Agreement, the 'Irish backstop' was removed, and replaced by this new protocol. The whole of the UK would leave the EU Customs Union as a single customs territory with Northern Ireland included in any future British trade agreements, but that Northern Ireland would adopt EU Single Market regulations on goods and thus remain an entry point into the EU Customs Union. Doing so would prevent a 'hard border' on the island of Ireland. The Protocol includes some protections for human rights and equality measures in its Article 2 and specific EU anti-discrimination measures are listed in Annex 1.
This new protocol has been dubbed by some as "Chequers for Northern Ireland", due to its similarity with the UK-wide Chequers future relationship plan proposed by Theresa May, which had previously been rejected by the EU and denounced by Johnson.
During the 2019 election campaign, a leaked HM Treasury analysis explained some of the implications of the protocol. The (undated) paper said the NI would be cut off from whole swathes of the UK Internal Market, would face shortages and prices rises in shops and would effectively be severed from the UK's economic union. Asked about the report at press conference, Prime Minister Johnston said "there wil be no checks on goods going from GB to NI, and from NI to GB".
Rather than being a fallback position as the backstop was intended to be, the protocol specifies the arrangements for Northern Ireland for at least the first four years beginning January 2021. Its status thereafter is subject to continued democratic consent in Northern Ireland to the continuance of Articles 5 to 10. Article 18 specifies that this is to be determined by a simple majority of members of the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Article 1: Protocol objectives
Article 1 of the protocol establishes that it is without prejudice to the provisions in the 1998 Good Friday (or Belfast) Agreement relating to the constitutional status of Northern Ireland and the consent principle. The 1998 Agreement specifies that Northern Ireland is part of the United Kingdom and that this position will not change without the consent of a majority in Northern Ireland voting in a referendum.
Article 2: Rights of individuals
Article 2 of the protocol provides that the UK's exit from the EU shall not cause any diminution in the rights, safeguards and equality of opportunity in the 1998 Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement. The provision also protects specific EU anti-discrimination measures found in Annex 1 to the protocol. In this Article, the UK also agrees to facilitate the work of the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission, the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland and the joint committee of the island's two human rights commissions.
Article 3: Common Travel Area
Article 3 recognises the right of the United Kingdom and Ireland to continue the Common Travel Area, their bilateral agreement on free movement of British and Irish citizens between their jurisdictions.
Articles 4 and 5: Customs territory, customs controls and movement of goods
Article 4 affirms that Northern Ireland is and remains part of the customs territory of the United Kingdom. Northern Ireland thus part of any future UK trade deals and nothing in the Protocol inhibits any agreement that allows exports from Northern Ireland on the same basis as those from Great Britain.
Article 5 deals with customs duties. No such duties apply to movement of goods (in either direction) between Northern Ireland and Great Britain unless the goods are intended (or at risk of) onward transfer to the Union. EU tariffs from third countries collected by the UK on behalf of the EU, would be levied on the goods going from Great Britain to Northern Ireland that are "at risk" of then being transported into and sold in the Republic of Ireland; if they ultimately aren't, then firms in Northern Ireland can claim rebates on goods where the UK had lower tariffs than the EU. The joint committee will decide which goods are deemed "at risk".
The effect of these articles is that there is a de jure customs border on the island of Ireland between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, but a de facto customs border down the Irish Sea.
Article 6: Protection of the UK internal market
Article 6 affirms that goods from Northern Ireland shall have unfettered access to the rest of the UK internal market. "The Joint Committee shall keep the application of this paragraph under constant review and shall adopt appropriate recommendations with a view to avoiding controls at the ports and airports of Northern Ireland to the extent possible."
Article 7 states that it is UK law that applies to goods offered for sale in Northern Ireland, except in respect of veterinary certificates or official labels for plant reproductive material.
Article 8: VAT and excise
Article 8 says that some provisions of the EU law on VAT and excise duties apply in Northern Ireland but are collected and retained by the UK.
Article 9: Single electricity market
Article 9 governs the wholesale electricity market that operates on the island of Ireland.
Article 10: State aid
Article 10 of the Protocol deals with state aid, popularly known as the level playing field provision (which is covered more generally in Article 93 of the overall Withdrawal Agreement). The provisions of various EU laws apply to the United Kingdom as a whole, including state support for the production of and trade in agricultural products in Northern Ireland, "in respect of measures which affect that trade between Northern Ireland and the Union which is subject to this Protocol".
Article 11: Other areas of North-South cooperation
Article 11 states that the "Protocol shall be implemented and applied so as to maintain the necessary conditions for continued North-South cooperation" in a variety of areas.
Article 12: Implementation, application, supervision and enforcement
Article 12 affirms that the UK is "responsible for implementing and applying the provisions of Union law made applicable by this Protocol to and in the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland" and that EU representatives have the right to be present when it does so. The Article requires both sides to exchange information on a monthly basis.
This article also states that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has jurisdiction over interpretation of applicable EU laws (those listed in Article 19).
Article 13: Common provisions
This article is primarily concerned with interpretation of terms. As the protocol provides for application of EU-law in many areas there is a role for the European Court of Justice with regards to procedures in case of non-compliance as well as the possibility and requirement for UK courts to ask for preliminary rulings on the application of EU law and related parts of the protocol.
Articles 14 and 15: Specialised Committee and joint consultative working group
These articles cover bodies established to ensure effective operation of the protocol.
Article 16: Safeguards
Article 16 states that "if the application of this Protocol leads to serious economic, societal or environmental difficulties that are liable to persist, or to diversion of trade, the Union or the United Kingdom may unilaterally take appropriate safeguard measures. Such safeguard measures shall be restricted with regard to their scope and duration to what is strictly necessary in order to remedy the situation. Priority shall be given to such measures as will least disturb the functioning of this Protocol."
Article 17: Protection of financial interests
This article states that the parties will work against fraud.
Article 18: Democratic consent in Northern Ireland
Article 18 of the Protocol defines a mechanism by which members of the Northern Ireland Assembly can declare their consent to the continued operation of the Protocol or bring to an end Articles 5–10, as determined by simple majority of those voting. The first consent vote is scheduled for December 2024. If members vote against continuing with these arrangements, then there will be a two-year period for the UK and EU to agree to new arrangements, with recommendations made by a joint UK-EU committee. If the Assembly supports the continuance of Articles 5–10 with a majority vote, the provisions will continue for a further four years before another vote is taken; if the Assembly supports their operation on a cross-community basis, the articles will continue for eight years.
Article 19: Annexes
Annexes 1 to 7 form an integral part of this Protocol. Annexes 1 to 5 list the EU laws referenced in the earlier Articles. Annex 6 and 7 give the procedures referenced in Articles 10 and 16.
Political reaction to implementation
Unionist reaction to the Protocol was uniformly negative. In October 2020, the de facto border between Great Britain and Northern Ireland bore criticism from Lord Empey, the Ulster Unionist Party’s chief negotiator during the Good Friday Agreement and former Stormont minister. He described a border on the Irish Sea as "the most significant change that has taken place since partition" and that "Northern Ireland's centre of gravity could gradually move in a Dublin/Brussels direction. This cannot be without constitutional consequences." In February 2021, (then) DUP leader Arlene Foster objected to its implicit 'red line down the Irish Sea', contrary to the Prime Minister Johnson's assurances.
Anger over the protocol has contributed to rising tensions in the Unionist community which led to street violence in the Sandy Row district of Belfast on 2 April 2021. Up to 300 people were involved in disorder, 15 police officers were injured and there were 8 arrests. Eight prominent unionists who negotiated the 1998 Good Friday Agreement,[a] including David Trimble, called in May 2021 for the suspension of the Northern Ireland Protocol.
In summer 2021, the Loyalist Communities Council which represents many of the Loyalist paramilitary groups that were active during the troubles, cited the Protocol as justifying their withdrawal from the Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement, under which many of their members secured early release from prison. The Council subsequently announced politicians from the Republic were no longer welcome in Northern Ireland. This has been perceived as an escalation of threat and potential return to violence by these groups.
In September 2021, new DUP leader Sir Jeffery Donaldson declared that the DUP ministers would no longer participate in North-South ministerial councils with Ministers from the Irish government, that they would not enforce any action in their departments to implement Irish Sea border checks and, unless a long term solution was found to remove the Irish sea border, the DUP would quit the Northern Irish Executive which in turn would collapse the entire administration. Later that month, the more moderate Ulster Unionist Party put forward compromise proposals to change the protocol to better protect Northern Ireland's place in the UK Internal Market. This would include a new offence of knowingly exporting goods intended for the UK Internal Market to the EU Single Market. The proposal was immediately rejected by the DUP and TUV. At the end of the month, the four Unionist parties (DUP, PUP, TUV and UUP) released a joint declaration affirming their "opposition to the Northern Ireland Protocol, its mechanisms and structures" and reaffirmed their "unalterable position that the protocol must be rejected and replaced by arrangements which fully respect Northern Ireland's position as a constituent and integral part of the United Kingdom." However the parties declined to form an electoral pact that might maximise the number of anti-protocol MLAs to vote on continuance of the protocol as provided for in Article 18.
In January 2021, Northern Ireland-born former Labour MP and Brexit campaigner Kate Hoey criticised the British government for erecting a trade border "down the Irish Sea" – in other words, between the islands of Ireland and Great Britain. She stated that in order to prevent a 'hard border' on the island of Ireland, customs and other controls have instead been imposed on goods travelling from Great Britain to Northern Ireland; and that Northern Ireland remains for many purposes in the EU Single Market and Customs Union, subject to a regulatory regime into which it has no input.
Reaction of nationalist and cross-community parties
The main nationalist parties, Sinn Féin and the SDLP, and the Greens, have expressed support for the Protocol and called for its 'rigorous implementation'. Alliance Party leader and Stormont Justice Minister Naomi Long said there was a need for "pragmatic solutions" to protocol matters rather than for "people to escalate this into a constitutional crisis".
In September 2020, the British government drew up legislation that would give ministers the power to define what state aid needs to be reported to the EU and what products that are at risk of being brought into Ireland from Northern Ireland, which it defended as clarifying ambiguity in the protocol. Before publication Ursula von der Leyen said that this could break international law and in answer to a question in the House of Commons the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland Brandon Lewis said that the government's planned Internal Market Bill would "break international law" in a "specific and limited way", by introducing new powers to circumvent certain treaty obligations to the EU as set out in the withdrawal agreement. The draft provision led to the resignation of a senior Government lawyer and the Advocate General for Scotland.
These clauses were criticised by Sinn Féin  and Taoiseach Micheál Martin said "trust has been eroded". In October, the European Commission started an infringement procedure, and in December the EU-UK Joint Committee reached an agreement on practical aspects which allowed the UK Government to remove the controversial clauses before the bill became law.
Public views on the Protocol
An opinion poll ('Testing the Temperature') commissioned by Queen's University Belfast and carried out 24–28 March 2021, asked if the Protocol is on balance ‘a good thing’ for Northern Ireland. 44% of those questioned disagreed, 43% agreed and 9% had a neutral opinion.
Queen's University repeated their March poll between 11–14 June 2021. 48% (+4%) of those polled thought that the Protocol was on balance bad for Northern Ireland and 43% (=) thought it was on balance good. When asked if the Protocol was an 'appropriate means for managing the effects of Brexit on Northern Ireland', the response split with 47% agreeing and 47% disagreeing.
In October 2021 Queen's University published a third edition of their Testing the Temperature report. In the third report the percentage of respondents who believe the Protocol provides an appropriate means of managing the effects of Brexit has increased to 53% (42% disagreeing), while 52% believe that on balance the Protocol is a good thing for Northern Ireland (41% disagreeing). Respondents see negative features of the Protocol with 59% believing it has impacted negatively on political stability.
A survey of 1000 participants in October 2021 by Social Market Research for the University of Liverpool found the protocol to be the fourth most significant issue for respondents with about 10% putting it as their first or second concern; 55% (v 24%) found the EU's compromise proposals acceptable (as did a majority of DUP voters).
Plans before Brexit
According to the UK's implementation plan (July 2020), a system for checks on goods crossing from Great Britain to Northern Ireland will need three types of electronic paperwork, as detailed in an eleven-page document.
On 17 December 2020, the Joint Committee (led by Gove and Šefčovič) agreed a set of documents to give practical effect to the agreement.
Border control posts
To operate the terms of the protocol, the United Kingdom must provide border control posts at Northern Ireland's ports: actual provision of these facilities is the responsibility of Northern Ireland's Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA). Temporary buildings were put in place for 1 January 2021, but in February 2021, the responsible Northern Ireland minister, Gordon Lyons (DUP), ordered officials to stop work on new permanent facilities and to stop recruiting staff for them.
Despite an instruction by the UK Environment Secretary (George Eustice), DAERA Minister Edwin Poots (DUP) (who had taken over the portfolio from Gordon Lyons) continued to resist doing so. In April 2021, the permanent secretary of the DAERA told a Committee of the Northern Ireland Assembly on 15 April 2021 that the permanent border control posts were not expected to be built before 2023, subject to the agreement of the Northern Ireland Executive. He added that the 'business case' would not be ready before October 2021, despite the fact that contractors had already been engaged. Northern Ireland's Chief Veterinary Officer told the committee meeting that only a quarter of the checks required on goods entering the single market were being carried out at the temporary posts.
In its half yearly financial report 26 August 2021, Irish Continental Group, which operates ferries between Great Britain and the Republic of Ireland, expressed concern at the lack of implementation of checks on goods arriving into Northern Ireland from Great Britain, as required under the protocol. The company said that the continued absence of these checks (on goods destined for the Republic of Ireland) is causing a distortion in the level playing field, since goods that arrive directly into Republic of Ireland ports from Great Britain are checked on arrival.
The agreement provided for a delay of three months (ending 31 March 2021) to allow retailers, wholesales and logistics operations time to adjust to the new arrangements for goods movements from Great Britain to Northern Ireland.
The UK government asked through the Joint Committee structures for an extension of two years on these checks, claiming to anticipate severe difficulties with food supply in Northern Ireland. On 3 March 2021, the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland informed the UK Parliament of the Government's intention to instead unilaterally extend the grace period post-Brexit checks for a shorter six-month period. Following this announcement, the EU threatened legal action claiming the action was outside the Protocol process and was the second time the UK had sought to breach international law in relation to the Northern Ireland Protocol, an action backed by Simon Coveney, the Irish Minister for Foreign Affairs. On 9 April 2021 Bloomberg claimed that the EU is set to postpone the threatened legal action against the United Kingdom as a result of tensions in Northern Ireland. The EU announced 27 July 2021 that it was pausing its legal action against the United Kingdom to "buy time and space to consider the changes to the protocol sought by the UK".
The European Parliament, which had yet to ratify the EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement, postponed making a decision pending a resolution to the proposed infringement. It was announced 28 April 2021 that the agreement had been ratified.
Northern Ireland's Agriculture Minister Edwin Poots announced 1 June 2021 a unilateral delay to the introduction of checks on pets moving from Great Britain to Northern Ireland. Checks were to be introduced on 1 July 2021 under the terms of the Protocol but are now delayed until 'at least' October.
Unilateral extensions of the grace period
Under the terms of the Protocol, chilled meat products from Great Britain such as sausages were due to be banned from Northern Ireland after 1 July 2021. On 17 June 2021 the British Government requested an extenson of the grace period on chilled meats until 30 September. The EU agreed to the three month extension 30 June 2021.
The UK government unilaterally announced an indefinite extension of all grace periods 6 September 2021 to allow time for further discussions. The European Commission issued a statement that it 'took note' of the UK announcement, but did not threaten any legal action.
Attempts to renegotiate
This section appears to be slanted towards recent events. (October 2021)
On 4 October 2021, the UK government issued a veiled threat to ditch the Northern Ireland protocol warning it "cannot wait for ever" for the EU to respond to its demands to rewrite the Protocol. The Brexit minister, David Frost warned the EU that it must come back with 'ambitious' proposals to renegotiate the protocol. On 7 October, the EU responded, urging the UK to drop the "political rhetoric", saying that they the bloc would make "far-reaching proposals" to break the impasse. The main point of contention for the UK is the European Court of Justice’s (ECJ) responsibility to adjudicate on disputes that arise from interpretation of EU law (where the protocol applies them to Northern Ireland). In a speech at the British Embassy in Lisbon on 12 October, in advance of publication of the Commission's latest proposals, Frost declared his view that the Protocol was "not working", was "shredding the Good Friday Agreement", and was becoming "the biggest source of mistrust between us". On the same day, the Irish Times described the sides as "at loggerheads". On 6 November 2021, The Independent reported that talks between Frost and Šefčovič had ended "in deadlock" and that the European Commission had warned of "serious consequences" for the UK should it trigger Article 16. Talks are scheduled to resume on 8 November for a fourth week.
Article 16 of the protocol is a safeguard clause within the Northern Ireland Protocol that allows either party to take unilateral "strictly necessary" measures if applying the protocol "leads to serious economic, societal or environmental difficulties that are liable to persist, or to diversion of trade". The other party can then take "strictly necessary" proportionate rebalancing measures. Article 16 says that priority should be given to measures and rebalancing measures that 'least disturb the functioning' of the Protocol. There is further elaboration of this article 16 in Annex 7 of the Northern Ireland Protocol. This annex says that these unilateral measures may (except for exceptional circumstances) only be applied one month or more after notifying the other party about them.
Imports from Great Britain
Northern Ireland currently[when?] gets a large proportion of its food and other imports from Great Britain and there have been complaints that strict application of the restrictions under the Northern Ireland Protocol either already have created artificial shortages in Northern Ireland or that they have the potential for creating greater shortages in the future.
On 13 January 2021 British Prime Minister Boris Johnson first suggested the possibility of invoking Article 16 of the Protocol when answering a question in Parliament from a DUP MP, and promised to invoke Article 16 in answer to another DUP MP on 3 February to "ensure that there is no barrier down the Irish Sea".
COVID-19 vaccinations from the EU
In January 2021, the Von der Leyen Commission was in a dispute with AstraZeneca on the contractual details of the latter's COVID-19 vaccine and whether it was providing its "best efforts" to supply the EU with its product. On 29 January, the Commission published an export transparency mechanism to gain oversight of the movement of vaccines. This included reference to the possible use of Article 16 in introducing export controls, to prevent supplies of vaccine intended for the Republic of Ireland moving to Britain via Northern Ireland. This move was criticised in Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, and the UK, with Northern Ireland's first minister Arlene Foster calling it "an absolutely incredible act of hostility". The Commission reversed its proposal a few hours later. The Spanish foreign minister said the [proposed] use of Article 16 was an "accident" and "mishap" that had been resolved.
In June 2021, the High Court of Northern Ireland in Belfast ruled against an application (In re Jim Allister and others (EU Exit)) brought by several Unionist and pro-Brexit politicians to have the Protocol declared unlawful on several grounds, including it being in conflict with the Acts of Union 1800 and thus unconstitutional. The Court ruled that, while the Protocol does indeed run counter to the free trade provisions of the Acts (Article VI), the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 also has constitutional effect and by implication had repealed that aspect of the Acts of Union. The High Court also rejected arguments based on the Northern Ireland Act, the European Convention on Human Rights and European Union law. Likewise, the same court rejected a challenge to the Regulations which provided that the consent mechanism in the Protocol was not to be subject to the cross-community voting rules in the Assembly. In November 2021, not content with the decision of the High Court, the applicants appealed.
If we do have creativity in the UK we can solve the SPS. A Swiss deal would solve it overnight – but this is not good enough for the UK.
- Kenneth Clarke proposal for a EU/UK customs union, which would have avoided the need for any NI border. The Government defeated the proposal with DUP support
- 2021 Northern Ireland riots
- Common Veterinary Area, which enables free trade in animals and animal products between Switzerland and the EU
- "AGREEMENT on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community". Official Journal of the European Union. Document 12020W/TXT (L 29/7). 31 January 2020.
- "Brexit: What is in Boris Johnson's new deal with the EU?". BBC News. 21 October 2019. Retrieved 2 January 2020.
- "Brexit: EU and UK reach deal but DUP refuses support". BBC News. 17 October 2019. Retrieved 2 January 2020.
- Parker, George; Brunsden, Jim (11 October 2019). "How Boris Johnson moved to break the Brexit deadlock". Financial Times. Retrieved 2 January 2020.
- "Good Friday Agreement negotiators call for NI Protocol suspension". BBC News. 7 May 2021.
- The Good Friday Agreement – Department of Foreign Affairs, Government of Ireland
- Garry, John. "The EU referendum Vote in Northern Ireland: Implications for our understanding of citizens' political views and behaviour" (PDF). KESS. Retrieved 10 July 2021.
- Springford, John (7 March 2018). "Theresa May's Irish trilemma". Centre for European Reform. Retrieved 17 June 2019.
- "Theresa May says EU must 'evolve' its Brexit position". BBC News. 20 July 2018. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
- Brexit draft agreement: What has been agreed on Northern Ireland to avoid a hard border – Belfast Telegraph, 14 November 2018.
- European Commission – Fact Sheet: Protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland – European Commission, 14 November 2018.
- "Varadkar: Removing backstop 'is effectively no deal'". BBC News. 15 June 2019. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
- "Joint statement from the pro-Remain parties in the NI Assembly". Alliance.
- McCormack, Jayne (25 November 2018). "Brexit: DUP's Nigel Dodds says Brexit deal 'worse than no deal'". BBC News. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
- Ferguson, Amanda (9 March 2019). "Ulster Unionist Party leader says NI will not be EU 'dowry' for Brexit delivery". The Irish Times. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
- McCormack, Jayne (16 March 2019). "Jim Allister: Northern Ireland not the 'plaything' of EU". BBC News. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
- Rankin, Jennifer; Elgot, Jessica (20 August 2019). "EU rejects Boris Johnson request to remove backstop". The Guardian. Retrieved 2 January 2020.
- "Brexit: What is Boris Johnson's plan to avoid a hard Irish border?". BBC News. 2 October 2019.
- Boffey, Daniel; Rankin, Jennifer (7 October 2019). "Revealed: the EU's point-by-point rejection of Johnson's Brexit plan". The Guardian. Retrieved 2 January 2020.
- "Boris Johnson and Leo Varadkar say they 'see pathway' to Brexit deal". The Guardian. London. 10 October 2019. Retrieved 10 October 2019.
- "Brexit: Boris Johnson and Leo Varadkar 'can see pathway to a deal'". BBC News. 10 October 2019. Retrieved 23 December 2019.
- O'Carroll, Lisa (17 October 2019). "How is Boris Johnson's Brexit deal different from Theresa May's?". The Guardian.
- "Brexit: EU and UK reach deal but DUP refuses support". BBC News. 17 October 2019. Retrieved 23 December 2019.
- "Three key changes that underpin the new Brexit deal". CityAM. 17 October 2019.
- HM Treasury (n.d.). "NI Protocol: Unfettered access to the UKIM" (PDF) – via politico.eu.
- "This could be the most significant leaked document of the campaign". Sky News.
- "What do leaked Treasury documents tell us about checks on goods crossing the Irish Sea?". 6 December 2019.
- "The Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland Contents. Chapter 11: Implementation, application, supervision and enforcement, and other provisions (Articles 12, 13, 16, 17 and 19)". British Parliament. Retrieved 31 December 2020.
- Sargeant, Jess (1 March 2021). "Northern Ireland protocol: consent mechanism". Institute for Government. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
- McBride, Sam (14 October 2020). "Lord Empey: Irish Sea border biggest constitutional change since partition in 1921". www.newsletter.co.uk. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
- Kane, Alex (1 June 2020). "Alex Kane: Irish Sea 'border' looks set to stay". The Irish Times. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
- Hope, Christopher (3 February 2021). "Potatoes and tractors banned from Northern Ireland if they have British soil on them, says Arlene Foster". The Telegraph.
- "Appeal for calm after Belfast street violence". RTE News. 3 April 2021. Retrieved 3 April 2021.
- "Loyalist group withdraws support for Good Friday Agreement". BBC News. 4 March 2021.
- Hewitt, Ralph (18 June 2021). "You're not welcome here, loyalist umbrella body tells Irish officials". Belfast Telegraph.
- "NI Protocol: DUP could quit from Stormont 'within weeks'". BBC News. 9 September 2021.
- "Ulster Unionist party". politics.co.uk. Retrieved 3 October 2021.
- Cousins, Graeme (8 September 2021). "UUP 'solutions' to Northern Ireland Brexit Protocol criticised by DUP and TUV". News Letter.
- Halliday, Gillian (28 September 2021). "Unionist leaders sign declaration in fresh bid opposing NI protocol". Belfast Telegraph.
- Hoey, Kate (13 January 2021). "The Tories have betrayed Northern Ireland with their Brexit deal". Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 29 June 2021.
- "Brexit: No 10 must honour NI protocol, say Remain parties". BBC. 13 January 2021. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
- "UK plan to undermine withdrawal treaty puts Brexit talks at risk". Financial Times. 6 September 2020.
- Elgot, Jessica; O'Carroll, Lisa; Rankin, Jennifer (7 September 2020). "Brexit: Boris Johnson to override EU withdrawal agreement". The Guardian. Retrieved 8 September 2020.
- Boffey, Daniel; Elgot, Jessica; Stewart, Heather (7 September 2020). "Leaked EU cables reveal growing mistrust of UK in Brexit talks". The Guardian. Retrieved 8 September 2020.
- Elgot, Jessica; O'Carroll, Lisa (7 September 2020). "Downing Street defends Brexit plans for Northern Ireland". The Guardian. Retrieved 8 September 2020.
- Boffey, Daniel; Rankin, Jennifer (7 September 2020). "Von der Leyen warns UK against breaking international law over Brexit deal". The Guardian. Retrieved 11 April 2021.
- "Northern Ireland Secretary admits new bill will 'break international law'". BBC News. 8 September 2020. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
- O'Carroll, Lisa (8 September 2020). "Government admits new Brexit bill 'will break international law'". The Guardian.
- "Lord Keen: Senior law officer quits over Brexit bill row'". BBC. 16 September 2020.
- "A step forward or using Northern Ireland as a pawn: Parties divided over Boris Johnson's proposals to break EU deal". belfasttelegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 2 October 2020.
- "'Trust has been eroded' over UK's Brexit plan – Martin". rte.ie. Raidió Teilifís Éireann. 10 September 2020.
- von der Leyen, Ursula (1 October 2020). "Press statement by President von der Leyen on the implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement between the EU and the UK" (Press release). Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved 2 October 2020.
- Šefčovič, Maroš; Gove, Michael (1 October 2020). "Joint statement by the co-chairs of the EU-UK Joint Committee" (Press release). Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved 8 December 2020.
- O'Toole, Emer (8 December 2020). "Brexit: Tories remove law-breaking clauses from Internal Market Bill in U-turn". The National. Retrieved 9 December 2020.
- "Testing The Temperature 1. What do voters in Northern Ireland think about the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland?". Queen's University Belfast. 21 April 2021.
- "Opinion poll finds 49% in NI would vote to stay in UK". Belfast Telegraph. 21 April 2021.
- "Poll: 59% in Northern Ireland fear summer of violence over Brexit Irish Sea border". BBC News. 14 May 2021.
- "Testing The Temperature 2. What do voters in Northern Ireland think about the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland?". Queen's University Belfast. 30 June 2021.
- "Testing The Temperature 3. What do voters in Northern Ireland think about the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland?". Queen's University Belfast. October 2021.
- The Ireland/Northern Ireland Protocol: Consensus or Conflict? (PDF). Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences (Report). The University of Liverpool. 5 November 2021. cited in Mooney, John (5 November 2021). "EU protocol proposals backed by Northern Ireland voters". The Times. London.
- Lisa O'Carroll (2 July 2020). "First details emerge of system for checks on goods crossing Irish Sea". The Guardian. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
- "ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS". Official Journal of the European Union. European Commission. 17 December 2020.
The documents include amendments to the original agreement (No 3/2020); determination of "goods not at risk" of entering the EU (includes temporary easements) (No 4/2020); maximum state support and "level playing field" (No 5/2020); practical working arrangements for EU inspectors at ports and airports (No 6/2020); and establishment of an arbitration panel for dispute resolution (No 7/2020).
- "NI sea border: Border control posts must progress 'without delay'". BBC News. 13 April 2021.
- John Campbell (27 February 2021). "Brexit: DUP agriculture minister orders Brexit check construction halt". BBC News.
- "Brexit: Irish Sea border posts 'delayed by two years'". BBC News. 15 April 2021.
- "Permanent facilities for Brexit checks at NI ports will not be ready 'until 2023'". RTE News. 15 April 2021.
- "ICG continues to see Covid impact on ferries business". RTE News. 26 August 2021.
- Daniel Boffey and Rory Carroll (3 March 2021). "Brussels says plan to extend Brexit grace period breaks international law". The Guardian. Retrieved 4 March 2021.
- Clarke, Vivienne (4 March 2021). "EU forced to take legal action as UK 'cannot be trusted' on protocol, says Coveney". The Irish Times. Retrieved 4 March 2021.
- "EU to Delay Brexit Legal Action Amid Northern Ireland Violence". Bloomberg. 9 April 2021.
- "EU pauses legal action against UK over Northern Ireland Protocol". RTE News. 27 July 2021.
- Daniel Boffey and Rory Carroll (4 March 2021). "EU postpones setting date for ratifying Brexit trade deal". The Guardian. Retrieved 4 March 2021.
- "Brexit: European Parliament backs UK trade deal". BBC News. 28 April 2021.
- "Brexit: Checks on pets travelling from GB to NI delayed". BBC News. 1 June 2021.
- "Sausage war: EU to 'assess' UK request for chilled meats to be traded with the North until October". The Journal.ie. 17 June 2021.
- "Brexit: EU postpones ban on British meat sales in NI". BBC News. 30 June 2021.
- "The NI Protocol: London's latest unilateral move, and Brussels' muted response". RTE News. 6 September 2021.
- "David Frost issues veiled threat to ditch Northern Ireland protocol". The Guardian. 4 October 2021. Retrieved 4 October 2021.
- "EU urges UK to drop rhetoric in Northern Ireland Brexit row". The Guardian. 7 October 2021.
- Yorke, Harry; Barnes, Joe; Crisp, James (11 October 2021). "Lord Frost: EU at risk of making 'historic misjudgment' over protocol concessions". The Telegraph.
- Neilan, Catherine (12 October 2021). "Northern Ireland Protocol is not working and has to change, Lord Frost warns". The Telegraph.
- Leahy, Pat; Staunton, Denis; O’Leary, Naomi; Carswell, Simon (12 October 2021). "London and Brussels at loggerheads over ECJ role in protocol". The Irish Times. Dublin.
- Woodcock, Andrew (6 November 2021). "EU warns of 'serious consequences' for UK in Northern Ireland Brexit trade row". The Independent. London.
- O'Carroll, Lisa (7 November 2021). "EU could shelve Brexit trade deal if UK triggers article 16, Irish minister warns". The Guardian. Retrieved 7 November 2021.
- "Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community" (PDF). Government of the United Kingdom. 19 October 2019. p. 326.
Clause 1 Article 16: "If the application of this Protocol leads to serious economic, societal or environmental difficulties that are liable to persist, or to diversion of trade, the Union or the United Kingdom may unilaterally take appropriate safeguard measures
- "EU's article 16 blunder has focused minds on Northern Ireland". The Guardian. 4 February 2021.
- "UK demands waiver on Northern Ireland Brexit checks to 2023". politico. 3 February 2021.
- "Watch: We will have 'no hesitation' in triggering Article 16 if necessary, says Boris Johnson". Belfast Telegraph.
- Moore, Aoife (3 February 2021). "Tensions rise in North after Johnson threatens to invoke Article 16". Irish Examiner.
- Blenkinsop, Philip (29 January 2021). "AstraZeneca contract includes UK as 'best effort' base for output to EU". Reuters.
- Bannerman, David Campbell (31 January 2021). "The EU's vaccine blunder has exposed major flaws in the Northern Ireland protocol". The Telegraph.
- Foster, Arlene (3 February 2021). "Sticking plasters will not fix the fundamental flaws in the Northern Ireland Protocol". The Telegraph.
- "EU vaccine export row: Bloc backtracks on controls for NI". BBC: News. 30 January 2021. Retrieved 30 January 2021.
- Lisa O'Carroll (29 January 2021). "'Welcome news': relief as EU backtracks on NI Covid vaccine move". The Guardian.
- "Summary of Judgment – In re Jim Allister and others (EU Exit)", NI Judiciary, 30 June 2021, retrieved 30 June 2021
- Campbell, John (30 June 2021). "Brexit: NI Protocol is lawful, High Court rules". BBC News. Retrieved 1 July 2021.
- "Allister (James Hugh) et al's Application and In the matter of the Protocol  NIQB 64". Judiciary NI.
- Campbell, John (29 November 2021). "Brexit: Court of Appeal hears challenge to NI Protocol". BBC Northern Ireland.
- O'Carroll, Lisa; Boffey, Daniel (14 September 2021). "Britain to delay some post-Brexit border controls due to Covid crisis". The Guardian. Retrieved 14 September 2021.
- "PROTOCOL ON IRELAND/NORTHERN IRELAND". Official Journal of the European Union. Document 12020W/TXT (L 29/7). 31 January 2020. (Shortcut to "Protocols" section of overall "Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community")
- "Border Control Posts". apha.defra.gov.uk. Animal and Plant Health Agency. Archived from the original on 19 April 2021.
A Border Control Post is an inspection post designated and approved in line with EU legislation for carrying out checks on animals and animal products arriving from third countries at a European Union border. These checks are carried out to protect animal and public health, and animal welfare.
- "Guidance: Placing manufactured goods on the market in Northern Ireland". Government of the United Kingdom. 31 December 2020.
- "EU Withdrawal Agreement and the Ireland/Northern Ireland Protocol" (PDF). Ulster Unionist Party. September 2021. Retrieved 10 September 2021. (UUP's "proposed alternatives")
- "Is the Court of Justice of the EU the supreme court for all Protocol issues?". FactCheckNI. 22 October 2021. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
- "Brexit: What has the European Court of Justice got to do with the NI Protocol?". BBC Northern Ireland. 12 October 2021.
- Howse, Robert L. (New York University School of Law) (8 November 2021), "This is not an exit": The Article 16 Safeguards in the Ireland/Northern Ireland Protocol, Brexit Institute Working Paper Series, No 14/2021, SSRN/Elsevier, retrieved 10 November 2021